← Back to Acts 13 · Full Acts 13 study page
How the consensus for Acts 13 was built
Every step of the working, exactly as it ran. Nothing here is hand-edited: the translations came from this app’s database, each tradition’s reading was generated in isolated calls that do not see one another (isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses), and the consensus was synthesized from those readings alone.
- Model:
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)
- Generated:
- Oct 21, 2026, 1:26 AM UTC
- Method:
- claim-audited, source-language-based, family-weighted
Step 1Read the passage in every public-domain translation
7 translations, fed to every step. The AI-generated NCB is never a source.
WEB · World English Bible
KJV · King James Version
ASV · American Standard Version
YLT · Young's Literal Translation
Darby · Darby Translation
Webster · Webster Bible
DRC · Douay-Rheims (Challoner)
Step 2Each eligible tradition reads the chapter — 12 voting profiles across 3 families
Isolated AI-generated profiles that do not see one another. Genre-aware, and honest about thin material.
Ancient Communions · The undivided-church and pre-Reformation episcopal traditions.
Catholicaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Roman Catholic tradition drawing on both Latin AND Eastern Catholic sources — and actually showing the Eastern dimension, not merely promising it: Scripture within Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium (the Catechism, the Latin Fathers, Augustine, Aquinas and the scholastics, the councils) together with the Eastern Catholic churches in communion with Rome and the Greek and Syriac Fathers they share. Sacramental and typological reading. Distinguish teaching shared across the whole Catholic communion from emphases specific to the Latin or to the Eastern Catholic churches.
Immediate meaning — In the cosmopolitan church of Antioch, while the leaders are engaged in worship and fasting, the Holy Spirit directs them to set apart Barnabas and Saul for a specific mission. After laying hands on them, the community sends them forth. On Cyprus, Saul (now called Paul) encounters Elymas, a Jewish sorcerer who opposes the Gospel; filled with the Spirit, Paul strikes Elymas temporarily blind, leading the Roman proconsul to faith. Traveling on to Antioch of Pisidia, Paul delivers his first major recorded sermon in the synagogue. He traces the history of Israel from the Exodus to King David, climaxing in the arrival of Jesus as the promised Davidic Savior. Paul proclaims that Jesus' resurrection, which escaped the bodily decay experienced by David, fulfills the prophecies of the Psalms. When the Jewish leaders reject the message out of jealousy, Paul and Barnabas boldly turn to the Gentiles, bringing joy to the nations and fulfilling the vocation to be a 'light to the ends of the earth,' before facing persecution and moving on to Iconium.
Reception — The Catholic communion, across both its Latin and Eastern traditions, reads the opening of Acts 13 as a foundational text for ecclesiology, liturgy, and the Sacrament of Holy Orders. The Greek term for 'ministering' in verse 2 (*leitourgounton*) is universally recognized by the Fathers as denoting the Eucharistic liturgy. St. John Chrysostom emphasizes that it is precisely during this communal liturgical action and fasting that the Holy Spirit speaks and acts, a teaching preserved vividly in the Eastern Catholic understanding of the Divine Liturgy as the perpetual upper room. Furthermore, the 'laying on of hands' (verse 3) is received dogmatically as the apostolic transmission of the Sacrament of Holy Orders (in the East, *cheirotonia*). The Council of Trent points to such apostolic actions as the visible, scriptural sign of the sacrament that confers grace for ministry. Paul’s sermon in Pisidian Antioch provides a major Christological synthesis. St. Bede the Venerable notes how Paul utilizes Psalms 2 and 16 to prove that the incorruptibility of Christ's resurrected body is the definitive fulfillment of the Davidic covenant. The juxtaposition of David, who 'saw corruption,' with Christ, who did not, underscores the transition from the old dispensation to the new creation. Finally, verse 48 ('as many as were ordained to eternal life believed') has served as a central locus for Catholic reflection on grace. St. Thomas Aquinas marshals this verse to defend the doctrine of predestination, asserting that the act of saving faith is the temporal effect of God's eternal decree to give grace, a teaching the Magisterium holds in tension with the inviolable reality of human free will.
Application — The Church explicitly applies the pattern of Acts 13:2-3 to her sacramental life. The ancient practice of Ember Days in the Latin Church—seasons of fasting and prayer uniquely associated with the ordination of clergy—is a direct imitation of the Antioch community's fasting before laying hands on Paul and Barnabas. In both East and West, fasting remains a required preparation for the reception of Holy Orders. Missiologically, Paul's approach of preaching 'to the Jew first' remains a paradigm for recognizing the historical primacy of Israel's election, while his turning to the Gentiles (verses 46-47) animates the Church's universal missionary mandate. The apostolic act of 'shaking off the dust' (verse 51) is applied in Catholic spiritual theology not as an act of vindictive anger, but as a prophetic sign of detachment and a solemn warning of the spiritual consequences of obstinately refusing the Gospel.
Authorities named:John Chrysostom — Homilies on the Acts of the Apostles · Council of Trent — Decree on the Sacrament of Order · Bede the Venerable — Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles · Thomas Aquinas — Summa Theologiae
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The community's 'ministering' refers to the Eucharistic liturgy, during which th
- ✓ The laying on of hands accompanied by fasting and prayer is the transmission of
- ✓ The incorruptible resurrection of Christ fulfills the Davidic promises in Psalms
- ✓ The grace of faith in those who believe is the temporal effect of God's eternal
- ✓ The Church models her practice of fasting and prayer prior to the ordination of
Eastern Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Eastern Orthodox tradition: Scripture within Holy Tradition and the consensus of the Fathers (patristic consensus). Emphases on theosis, the liturgy, the Septuagint text, apophatic mystery over precise definition, and the seven Ecumenical Councils.
Immediate meaning — In Antioch, during a time of communal worship and fasting, the Holy Spirit directs the church to set apart Barnabas and Saul for missionary work. They are commissioned with the laying on of hands and travel to Cyprus, where Paul blinds the sorcerer Elymas, leading the proconsul to faith. In Pisidian Antioch, Paul preaches a synagogue sermon that recounts Israel's history, culminating in the declaration that Jesus fulfills the Davidic promises through His resurrection from the dead, a resurrection that definitively overcomes bodily corruption. When the Jewish leaders reject this message, Paul and Barnabas turn to the Gentiles, resulting in widespread belief among those disposed to eternal life, despite ensuing persecution.
Reception — Eastern Orthodox reception of Acts 13 places a strong emphasis on the liturgical, sacramental, and synergistic elements of the text. Verse 2 is highly significant: the Greek text states they were 'ministering' (leitourgounton) to the Lord. The Orthodox tradition points to this as apostolic evidence for the Divine Liturgy, emphasizing that the Holy Spirit speaks and directs the Church precisely within the matrix of corporate liturgical worship and ascetic fasting. Verse 3 is recognized as an early instance of sacramental ordination (cheirotonia) or commissioning via the laying on of hands, establishing apostolic succession. In Paul's sermon, the reliance on the Septuagint text of the Psalms to argue that Christ saw no 'corruption' (diaphthoran, verses 34-37) is central to the Orthodox understanding of salvation as victory over death and the incorruptibility of Christ's deified human nature. Finally, regarding verse 48 ('as many as were ordained to eternal life believed'), the tradition, articulated by John Chrysostom, vigorously rejects fatalistic predestination. Instead, it reads 'ordained' (tetagmenoi) through the lens of synergy, understanding it to mean those who had 'disposed' or 'arrayed' themselves toward eternal life through their free cooperation with divine grace.
Application — In Orthodox application, this chapter provides foundational apologetics for the necessity of liturgical worship and the discipline of fasting, demonstrating that asceticism and the Liturgy are the environments in which the Holy Spirit operates. The text is read corporately during the post-Paschal (Easter) season, as the Book of Acts is read continuously from Pascha to Pentecost, illustrating the power of the Resurrected Christ animating the early Church. Verse 2 is frequently cited in liturgical theology to underscore that mission and evangelism flow directly from the Eucharistic gathering.
Authorities named:John Chrysostom — Homilies on the Acts of the Apostles
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The use of the Greek word 'leitourgounton' signifies that the early church was e
- ✓ The fasting and laying on of hands by the Antiochian church represent sacramenta
- ✓ The use of the Septuagint to emphasize that Christ's body did not see 'corruptio
- ✓ The phrase 'ordained to eternal life' is interpreted synergistically, denoting t
- ✓ The chapter is utilized in the lectionary during the Paschal season to demonstra
Oriental Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Oriental Orthodox tradition (Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac): Scripture within the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils and the miaphysite Fathers (Athanasius, Cyril of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch). Deeply liturgical, ascetic, and typological reading; some of these churches hold wider canons.
Immediate meaning — The chapter recounts the church of Antioch engaging in communal worship and fasting (vv. 1-2), during which the Holy Spirit sets apart Barnabas and Saul. They are commissioned with prayer and the laying on of hands (v. 3). Their mission encounters spiritual opposition in Cyprus (vv. 6-11), leading to the blinding of Elymas. In Pisidian Antioch, Paul preaches a synagogue sermon summarizing Israel's history (vv. 17-22) and identifying Jesus as the promised Davidic Savior (v. 23). Paul testifies to Christ's unjust death and vindicating resurrection (vv. 27-30), interpreting the resurrection through the Psalms as the fulfillment of the incorruptible promise to David (vv. 33-37). The rejection of this message by many in the synagogue prompts the apostles to turn definitively to the Gentiles (vv. 46-47).
Reception — In the Oriental Orthodox tradition, this chapter is foundational for both ecclesial asceticism and Christology. The Greek word for 'ministering' in verse 2 is received liturgically as the celebration of the Eucharist, inextricably linking the Divine Liturgy, ascetic fasting, and the operations of the Holy Spirit. Christologically, Paul's sermon provides key proof-texts for the miaphysite Fathers. Paul's application of Psalm 2:7 ('Today I have begotten thee') in verse 33 was defended by Cyril of Alexandria. Cyril insisted that this 'begetting' refers to the bodily resurrection and the public manifestation of Christ's glory, not a secondary or adoptive sonship, thereby safeguarding the single incarnate nature of the Word. Furthermore, Paul's declaration that Christ 'saw no corruption' (v. 37) became a central text during the sixth-century controversy over the corruptibility of Christ's body. Severus of Antioch argued from this apostolic witness that the Word freely assumed a genuinely passible, mortal human body that suffered true death. However, by virtue of the hypostatic union, that body was preserved from decomposition (decay) in the tomb. This reading maintained the orthodox balance, firmly rejecting the aphthartodocetism of Julian of Halicarnassus, who claimed the body was naturally incorruptible from the moment of the incarnation.
Application — Verses 2 and 3 provide the primary scriptural mandate for the 'Apostles' Fast' (known as Tsome Hawaryat in the Ethiopian tradition and Som al-Rusul in the Coptic). The tradition dictates that just as the apostles fasted before embarking on their evangelistic mission, the Church observes a period of fasting immediately following the feast of Pentecost. Liturgically, the laying on of hands (v. 3) serves as the paradigm for the sacrament of Holy Orders, emphasizing that ordination must be accompanied by prayer and fasting. Additionally, reading from the Acts of the Apostles (the Praxis) is a mandatory component of the Coptic and Syriac Divine Liturgies.
Authorities named:Cyril of Alexandria — That Christ is One · Severus of Antioch — Against Julian · Abu'l-Barakat ibn Kabar — The Lamp of Darkness
claim-level audit (6 checks)
- ✓ The church in Antioch engaged in communal worship and fasting, leading the Holy
- ✓ Paul's synagogue sermon identifies Jesus as the fulfillment of God's promises to
- ✓ The citation 'Today I have begotten thee' refers to the bodily resurrection and
- ✓ The fact that Christ 'saw no corruption' demonstrates that while His body was na
- ✓ The fasting of the apostles before their mission is the scriptural foundation fo
- ✓ The laying on of hands with prayer and fasting serves as the scriptural paradigm
Reformation Traditions · The magisterial churches of the sixteenth-century Reformation.
Anglican / Episcopalaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Anglican tradition (including the Episcopal Church): Scripture read with tradition and reason (Hooker); the Book of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles; a comprehensiveness spanning evangelical, anglo-catholic, and broad/progressive readings — name that spectrum where the passage has been read across it.
Immediate meaning — The chapter details the commissioning of Paul and Barnabas by the diverse church at Antioch, their first missionary journey to Cyprus, and Paul's inaugural recorded sermon in Pisidian Antioch. The narrative moves from the Holy Spirit's direction in fasting and laying on of hands to a confrontation with a sorcerer (Elymas), before focusing heavily on Paul's synagogue address. Paul recounts Israel's history, culminating in God's promise to David, and proclaims that Jesus' resurrection fulfills this promise. The sermon ends with a stark declaration of justification by faith and a warning against unbelief, leading to a rupture where Paul and Barnabas turn their mission to the Gentiles amidst Jewish opposition.
Reception — Anglican reception of Acts 13 emphasizes its ecclesiological models, soteriological declarations, and missiological scope, reflecting the comprehensiveness of the tradition. Ecclesiologically, the commissioning of Paul and Barnabas (vv. 2-3) is foundational for the Anglican understanding of holy orders. Richard Hooker points to this passage to argue that even when an inward call is directly from the Holy Spirit, the Church requires an outward, orderly commission through the laying on of hands by proper authorities. Broad and progressive streams within the tradition increasingly highlight the multi-ethnic list of prophets and teachers at Antioch (v. 1)—including Simeon Niger and Lucius of Cyrene—as a paradigm for an inclusive, catholic church leadership. Soteriologically, the chapter hosts internal Anglican debates over justification and predestination. Evangelical Anglicans read Paul's declaration that believers are 'justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses' (vv. 38-39) as a definitive locus for Article XI of the Thirty-Nine Articles (Of the Justification of Man), closely aligning with John Stott's emphasis on the distinctively Pauline gospel. Furthermore, verse 48 ('as many as were ordained to eternal life believed') historically served as a prooftext for Reformed elements in the early English Church (reflecting Article XVII, Of Predestination and Election). However, Caroline Divines, most notably Henry Hammond, famously re-exegeted this verse to mean 'disposed' or 'set in order' for eternal life, moving the tradition away from strict Calvinist double-predestination toward a theology that balances grace with human response.
Application — In application, Acts 13 profoundly shapes the liturgical life of the Book of Common Prayer. The Antioch church's practice of fasting and praying before commissioning ministers (vv. 2-3) is the direct scriptural basis for the Ember Days—four seasonal periods set apart for prayer and fasting on behalf of those preparing for ordination. Additionally, the pattern of synagogue worship depicted in verse 15 (the reading of the law and prophets followed by exhortation) is traditionally seen as a biblical mirror for the synaxis of the Daily Office (Morning and Evening Prayer). In the lectionary, Paul's extensive preaching on the resurrection and the fulfillment of the Davidic promises (vv. 30-37) is a staple of Eastertide, while the missionary pivot to the Gentiles (vv. 46-47) is frequently utilized in Epiphany liturgies to celebrate the universal light of Christ.
Authorities named:Richard Hooker — Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity · Henry Hammond — A Paraphrase and Annotations upon all the Books of the New Testament · John Stott — The Message of Acts · The Book of Common Prayer — The Ordinal / Prayers and Thanksgivings
claim-level audit (6 checks)
- ✓ The diverse list of leaders in the Antioch church serves as a biblical model for
- ✓ The outward commissioning through the laying on of hands validates the necessity
- ✓ Paul's declaration that believers are justified from all things apart from the l
- ✓ The Greek word translated 'ordained' in verse 48 is historically interpreted by
- ✓ The practice of fasting and praying before commissioning is the scriptural found
- ✓ The pattern of reading scripture followed by exhortation reflects the structure
Lutheranaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Lutheran tradition (the Book of Concord): the law–gospel distinction, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura held with the ecumenical creeds, the theology of the cross, and sacramental realism.
Immediate meaning — The narrative of Acts 13 records the commissioning of Barnabas and Saul by the Holy Spirit, their initial missionary work in Cyprus, and Paul's major sermon in the synagogue at Pisidian Antioch. Paul's address rehearses Israel's history, identifies Jesus as the promised Davidic Savior, and interprets His death and resurrection as the fulfillment of scriptural prophecy. The theological climax of the sermon lies in verses 38-39, where Paul declares the forgiveness of sins through Jesus and asserts that everyone who believes is justified from all things from which the Law of Moses could not justify them. The chapter concludes with the varied responses of the audience, the apostolic turn to the Gentiles, and the assertion that those ordained to eternal life believed, culminating in the disciples being filled with joy and the Holy Spirit despite persecution.
Reception — In the Lutheran tradition, Acts 13 is a paramount text for defining the core doctrine of justification by faith alone and the proper distinction between law and gospel. Philipp Melanchthon, in the Apology of the Augsburg Confession, heavily relies on Acts 13:38-39 as irrefutable scriptural proof that the Law of Moses cannot justify the sinner before God. Melanchthon argues that Paul sets up a direct dialectic between the impotence of the law and the efficacy of the gospel, showing that justification is synonymous with the forgiveness of sins and is received purely by faith in Christ. Furthermore, the Formula of Concord appeals to verse 48 ('as many as were ordained to eternal life believed') to articulate the Lutheran understanding of election. The confessors utilize this verse to demonstrate that saving faith is not a product of human free will or cooperation, but flows entirely from God's gracious, eternal predestination in Christ, which is made manifest through the external preaching of the Gospel.
Application — Lutherans apply Acts 13 primarily to the theology of preaching, emphasizing that the public proclamation of the Word must mirror Paul's sermon by sharply distinguishing the law, which exposes sin and human inability, from the gospel, which delivers the forgiveness of sins and justification. Pastors are instructed to point congregants to the objective promise of Christ crucified and risen, trusting that the Holy Spirit actively works faith through this proclaimed Word. Additionally, the narrative provides pastoral comfort regarding election and the cross: despite the rejection and persecution the apostles face from those who thrust the Word away, the Church is assured that the Word accomplishes its purpose. Believers are pointed to verse 48 to find deep assurance that their faith rests securely in God's eternal ordination to life, freeing them to live in the joy of the Holy Spirit (v. 52).
Authorities named:Philipp Melanchthon — Apology of the Augsburg Confession · Martin Chemnitz, Jakob Andreae, et al. — Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ Paul's sermon structurally culminates in a stark contrast between the inability
- ✓ Acts 13:38-39 serves as a foundational prooftext for justification by faith alon
- ✓ Belief in the gospel is the direct consequence of being ordained to eternal life
- ✓ Preaching must actively deliver the forgiveness of sins and point hearers to Chr
Reformed / Presbyterianaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Reformed tradition (Calvin; the Westminster Standards; the Heidelberg and Belgic confessions): the sovereignty of God and covenant theology, a redemptive-historical reading of Scripture, and the regulative principle.
Immediate meaning — The narrative describes the commissioning of Paul and Barnabas from the church at Antioch, their initial ministry in Cyprus, and Paul's paradigmatic synagogue sermon in Pisidian Antioch. Led by the Holy Spirit, the Antioch leaders fast, pray, and lay hands on the missionaries (vv. 2-3). In Pisidia, Paul's sermon traces God's sovereign orchestration of Israel's history—from the exodus to David—culminating in the advent, death, and resurrection of Jesus. Paul concludes by declaring that remission of sins and justification are available through Jesus, uniquely accomplishing what the law of Moses could not (vv. 38-39). Upon Jewish rejection, the apostles turn to the Gentiles, and the narrative explicitly notes that 'as many as were ordained to eternal life believed' (v. 48).
Reception — Reformed theology heavily emphasizes Acts 13 as a foundational text for unconditional election, forensic justification, and Presbyterian polity. Verse 48 is a cardinal proof-text for the Reformed doctrine of predestination. The Synod of Dort and the Westminster Confession of Faith cite 'as many as were ordained to eternal life believed' to demonstrate that saving faith is the fruit and consequence of God's eternal decree of election, not its cause. John Calvin similarly argues from this verse that election cannot be based on foreseen faith, because the text deliberately makes belief the result of being 'ordained' to life. Verses 38-39 form a critical locus for the Reformed understanding of justification by faith alone. Calvin notes that Paul contrasts the perfect righteousness found in Christ with the impotence of the Mosaic law, establishing that justification is a forensic declaration of pardon and right standing before God. The Westminster Confession uses these verses to assert that justification is entirely apart from the works of the law. Additionally, verses 2-3 inform Reformed ecclesiology. The fasting, praying, and laying on of hands by the prophets and teachers at Antioch is read as the normative pattern for ordination. Calvin and later Presbyterian theologians point to this as evidence that even those uniquely and inwardly called by the Holy Spirit (like Paul) must be formally recognized and set apart by the visible church's officers. Finally, Paul's sermon (vv. 16-41) exemplifies redemptive-historical preaching, a hallmark of Reformed covenant theology. Paul does not present Jesus as a novel rupture but as the fulfillment of the one covenant of grace, applying the 'sure mercies of David' (v. 34) directly to Christ's resurrection.
Application — The Reformed tradition applies this chapter to assure believers that their salvation rests securely in God's eternal decree rather than their own fickle will. In evangelism and missions, verse 48 is wielded as a profound comfort; ministers preach the gospel freely to all, trusting that God's sovereign election guarantees the success of the word among the nations. Ecclesiastically, the chapter shapes the liturgy of ordination, requiring solemn prayer, fasting, and the laying on of hands by the presbytery. Homiletically, Paul's sermon models the requirement that all Scripture be preached as pointing to Christ's fulfillment of the covenant promises.
Authorities named:John Calvin — Institutes of the Christian Religion · Synod of Dort — Canons of Dort · Westminster Assembly — Westminster Confession of Faith · John Calvin — Commentary upon the Acts of the Apostles
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The laying on of hands in Antioch establishes the normative Presbyterian pattern
- ✓ Justification is a forensic declaration of remission of sins that the law of Mos
- ✓ Saving faith is the direct result of God's prior, unconditional ordination to et
- ✓ The history of Israel and the Davidic promises find their unified fulfillment in
- ✓ God's sovereign election is the basis for confidence in missions, guaranteeing t
Free-Church & Revival Traditions · Believers'-church, revival, and restorationist movements.
Baptistaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Baptist tradition (e.g. the 1689 Second London Confession, the Baptist Faith & Message — note the range): believers' baptism, congregational polity, liberty of conscience, a memorial reading of the ordinances, and strong emphasis on personal conversion and biblical authority.
Immediate meaning — Acts 13 marks a pivotal transition in the early church, beginning with the congregation at Antioch fasting, praying, and sending out Barnabas and Saul under the Holy Spirit's direction (Acts 13:1-3). The narrative follows their missionary journey to Cyprus, where Paul confronts Elymas the sorcerer, and then to Pisidian Antioch. There, Paul delivers a major synagogue sermon recounting God's redemptive history with Israel, culminating in the death and resurrection of Jesus. He proclaims that forgiveness of sins and justification are found in Christ alone, apart from the law of Moses (Acts 13:38-39). The chapter concludes with the Gentiles receiving the gospel joyfully (Acts 13:48), while Jewish opposition forces the missionaries to move on, leaving the new disciples filled with joy (Acts 13:50-52).
Reception — Baptist tradition has heavily utilized Acts 13 for its ecclesiology, missiology, and soteriology. Verses 1-3 are foundational for Baptist congregational polity. John L. Dagg, in his 'Manual of Church Order', points to the Antioch church as demonstrating that a local, autonomous congregation possesses the authority to ordain and commission missionaries without recourse to a higher bishopric or centralized hierarchy. The acts of fasting, prayer, and laying on of hands are viewed as the local church's recognition of the Holy Spirit's internal call. Theologically, Paul's sermon provides crucial texts for Baptist soteriology. The 'Second London Baptist Confession' relies on verses 38-39 to articulate the doctrine of justification by faith alone, emphasizing that Christ provides full remission of sins which the Law of Moses could not secure. Furthermore, verse 48 ('as many as were ordained to eternal life believed') has been a central text in Baptist debates over election. Particular (Calvinistic) Baptists, such as John Gill in his 'Exposition of the Old and New Testaments', interpret this verse as an explicit defense of unconditional election, arguing that saving faith is the consequent fruit of God's sovereign predestination. In contrast, General Baptists have historically read the verse as referring to a disposition of the heart or God's foreknowledge, reflecting the tradition's internal diversity on the mechanics of personal conversion.
Application — In application, Baptists view Acts 13 as a perpetual mandate for local church missions. Congregations are taught to actively identify, validate, and send out missionaries from their own membership, supporting them with prayer and fasting. Paul's sermon models the expected pattern for Baptist preaching: expository, historically grounded, Christ-centered, and concluding with a direct appeal for personal faith and conversion. Additionally, the chapter prepares believers to expect both joyful reception by the elect and fierce opposition, instructing them to persist in evangelism with boldness and reliance on the Holy Spirit.
Authorities named:John L. Dagg — Manual of Church Order · Second London Baptist Confession — 1689 Confession · John Gill — Exposition of the Old and New Testaments
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The local church at Antioch demonstrates congregational authority to commission
- ✓ Christ provides full remission of sins and justification by faith, accomplishing
- ✓ The phrase 'ordained to eternal life' is interpreted by Calvinistic Baptists as
- ✓ Acts 13 establishes a permanent model for local congregations to actively send a
- ✓ Paul's synagogue sermon serves as a model for Christ-centered preaching that con
Methodist / Wesleyan / Holinessaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Wesleyan-Holiness tradition: prevenient grace and free response, sanctification and entire sanctification / Christian perfection, the Wesleyan quadrilateral (Scripture primary, with tradition, reason, and experience), and warm-hearted practical piety.
Immediate meaning — Acts 13 marks a pivotal narrative transition in the early church. The chapter opens in Antioch, where the Holy Spirit directs the church to separate Paul and Barnabas for missionary work. They travel to Cyprus, overcoming the opposition of the sorcerer Elymas through a demonstration of spiritual power, and proceed to Antioch in Pisidia. There, Paul delivers a major synagogue sermon, recounting Israel's history, pointing to Jesus as the promised Davidic Savior, and declaring that justification and forgiveness of sins come through faith in Him, not the Law of Moses. When the Jewish leaders reject the message out of jealousy, Paul and Barnabas turn to the Gentiles, many of whom believe. Despite subsequent persecution and expulsion, the chapter concludes with the disciples filled with joy and the Holy Spirit.
Reception — The Wesleyan reception of Acts 13 focuses heavily on two theological loci: the doctrine of justification by faith and the defense of prevenient grace against Calvinist interpretations of predestination. John Wesley frequently appealed to verses 38-39 as a foundational definition of justification, emphasizing that it consists in the forgiveness of sins and is received entirely by faith, distinct from the works of the Mosaic law. However, the most contested verse in the chapter for the Arminian-Wesleyan tradition is verse 48, which states that 'as many as were ordained to eternal life believed.' Historically, Reformed theologians used this text to support unconditional election. In stark contrast, John Wesley and later Adam Clarke argued vigorously that the Greek word 'tetagmenoi' (translated 'ordained' or 'appointed') should be understood as 'disposed.' In the Wesleyan reading, these Gentiles had yielded to God's prevenient grace, placing themselves in a disposition to receive the Gospel, rather than being the subjects of an absolute eternal decree that excluded others.
Application — In application, the Wesleyan-Holiness tradition draws on Acts 13 as a model for both global missions and warm-hearted practical piety. The Antioch church's posture of fasting, praying, and listening to the Holy Spirit (verses 2-3) is frequently cited as the normative pattern for discerning God's call to ministry and evangelism. Furthermore, the disciples' response to persecution—shaking off the dust and being 'filled with joy and with the Holy Spirit' (verse 52)—is preached as the hallmark of Christian perfection and experiential religion. Wesleyans pray for this same continuous filling of the Spirit, believing that true holiness produces an abiding joy that external circumstances, even severe persecution, cannot extinguish.
Authorities named:John Wesley — Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament · Adam Clarke — Commentary on the Bible · John Wesley — Sermon: Justification by Faith
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ Justification is defined primarily as the forgiveness of sins, which is obtained
- ✓ The Gentiles who 'were appointed to eternal life' believed because they were act
- ✓ The church must rely on fasting, prayer, and the direct guidance of the Holy Spi
- ✓ True experiential religion is evidenced by being filled with joy and the Holy Sp
Anabaptist / Mennoniteaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Anabaptist tradition (Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite): a Jesus-centered reading with the Sermon on the Mount as normative, believers' baptism, nonviolence and nonresistance, simple living, communal discernment, and the church as a visible community distinct from worldly power.
Immediate meaning — Acts 13 recounts the commissioning of Barnabas and Saul by the Antioch congregation, prompted by the Holy Spirit during a time of fasting and worship (13:1-3). The narrative follows their mission to Cyprus, where Paul pronounces divine blindness upon the sorcerer Elymas, leading the Roman proconsul to faith (13:4-12). Traveling to Pisidian Antioch, Paul preaches a sweeping summary of Israel's history, culminating in Jesus's crucifixion and resurrection, and declares that justification comes through Christ rather than the law of Moses (13:13-41). Although initially well-received, the message provokes jealousy among the synagogue leaders, prompting Paul and Barnabas to turn to the Gentiles (13:42-49). When persecution is incited against them, the apostles do not retaliate but shake the dust off their feet and move on to Iconium, filled with joy and the Holy Spirit (13:50-52).
Reception — In the Anabaptist and Mennonite tradition, Acts 13 is highly regarded as a blueprint for the 'believers' church' and its missional identity. The opening verses establish Antioch as a paradigm of a localized, voluntary community operating independently of centralized ecclesiastical or state power. The presence of diverse 'prophets and teachers' (13:1) is read as an endorsement of shared, plural leadership rather than a rigid hierarchy. The congregation's practice of fasting, praying, and communal discernment (13:2-3) exemplifies the tradition's belief that the Holy Spirit directs the church through the gathered body, not solely through institutional or top-down channels. Furthermore, the apostles’ response to violent expulsion (13:50-51) profoundly informs the Anabaptist theology of nonresistance and the nature of the true, suffering church. Rather than taking up arms, appealing to secular magistrates, or responding with coercive force, Paul and Barnabas obey Christ’s injunction to shake the dust from their feet. This act of nonviolent withdrawal, coupled with spiritual joy (13:52), is heralded by early Anabaptist leaders as the definitive Christian response to persecution.
Application — Contemporary Anabaptist communities apply the Antioch model by emphasizing the local congregation as the primary locus for mission and discernment. Decisions regarding the calling and commissioning of church workers are approached corporately, often accompanied by periods of fasting and prayer, ensuring that the selection is recognized by the whole body as the Spirit's leading. The narrative also shapes the tradition's pastoral approach to rejection and hostility: believers are exhorted to maintain a nonviolent posture, releasing bitterness or the desire for retaliation, and trusting that the word of the Lord spreads through faithful, vulnerable witness rather than forceful imposition.
Authorities named:John Howard Yoder — The Priestly Kingdom · Menno Simons — Foundation of Christian Doctrine
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ The church at Antioch serves as a foundational paradigm for communal discernment
- ✓ The diverse list of prophets and teachers models a plurality of shared leadershi
- ✓ Paul and Barnabas shaking the dust off their feet is read as a model of nonviole
- ✓ Congregations apply the text by using fasting and corporate prayer to discern th
Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal tradition (Assemblies of God, Church of God, and kindred bodies): the present continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine healing, and expectancy of God's present action, read within Nicene Trinitarian faith. Do NOT attribute Word-of-Faith / prosperity or later neo-charismatic distinctives to classical Pentecostalism generally.
Immediate meaning — Acts 13 narrates the commissioning of the first major missionary journey from the church in Antioch. The chapter opens with prophets and teachers worshiping and fasting, during which the Holy Spirit directly speaks, commanding the separation of Barnabas and Saul for a specific work. After fasting, praying, and laying on of hands, they are sent out by the Spirit. On Cyprus, they face spiritual opposition from Elymas, a Jewish sorcerer. Paul, filled with the Holy Spirit, miraculously strikes Elymas with temporary blindness, a display of power that leads the local proconsul to believe. Moving to Pisidian Antioch, Paul preaches a sermon connecting Israel's history to the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus, declaring that justification comes through Him alone. When the Jewish leaders reject the message, Paul and Barnabas pivot to the Gentiles, who receive the word with gladness. The chapter concludes with the missionaries being expelled from the region, but leaving behind new disciples who are filled with joy and the Holy Spirit.
Reception — Classical Pentecostals read Acts 13 as a foundational paradigm for Spirit-directed missiology, spiritual warfare, and charismatic ecclesiology. First, the phrase 'the Holy Spirit said' (v. 2) is historically and theologically vital to the tradition. Read within a Nicene Trinitarian framework, Pentecostals affirm the Holy Spirit as a fully divine, personal agent who actively governs the church. Stanley Horton notes that this text demonstrates the Spirit's personal agency, often manifesting through vocal gifts like prophecy in the context of corporate worship. The Antioch church models a charismatic community where human strategy is entirely subordinate to the prophetic direction of the Spirit. Second, the confrontation with Elymas (vv. 8-11) is classically understood as a 'power encounter.' French Arrington interprets this narrative to show that the spread of the Gospel inherently involves conflict with demonic and occult forces. Paul's pronouncement of blindness is not viewed as personal vindictiveness, but as a prophetic, Spirit-empowered judgment that tangibly demonstrates the supremacy of God's power, ultimately leading to conversion (v. 12). Third, the terminology of being 'filled with the Holy Spirit' (vv. 9, 52) supports the Pentecostal understanding of the Spirit's ongoing, dynamic work. Roger Stronstad highlights that Paul's filling in verse 9 is a sudden, momentary empowerment for a specific prophetic action, demonstrating that the Spirit's filling is a repeatable experience for service, distinct from an initial event. Likewise, the disciples' filling in verse 52 underscores the affective, experiential reality of the Spirit's presence, providing supernatural joy even amidst severe persecution.
Application — Pentecostal congregations apply this chapter by actively cultivating environments of worship, prayer, and fasting with the explicit expectation of hearing the Holy Spirit's voice regarding ministry callings and strategic direction. The practice of laying hands on missionaries and ministers is maintained as a vital moment of spiritual impartation and commissioning. In evangelistic efforts, particularly in contexts where animism or occult practices are prevalent, believers are taught to expect and pray for the power of the Holy Spirit to overcome spiritual opposition, trusting that God still uses signs and wonders to confirm the preaching of the Gospel. Furthermore, believers are continuously exhorted to seek fresh fillings of the Holy Spirit to sustain joy and boldness in the face of cultural hostility or persecution.
Authorities named:Stanley Horton — What the Bible Says About the Holy Spirit · French Arrington — The Acts of the Apostles · Roger Stronstad — The Charismatic Theology of St. Luke
claim-level audit (8 checks)
- ✓ The Holy Spirit speaks directly to the Antioch church, commanding the separation
- ✓ Paul, filled with the Holy Spirit, strikes Elymas the sorcerer with temporary bl
- ✓ The new disciples in Pisidian Antioch are filled with joy and the Holy Spirit de
- ✓ The Holy Spirit is a divine, personal agent who actively governs the church thro
- ✓ Missionary work involves power encounters where the Holy Spirit's authority tang
- ✓ Being filled with the Holy Spirit is a dynamic, repeatable experience for specif
- ✓ Congregations should practice corporate worship and fasting with the expectation
- ✓ Believers are encouraged to rely on the Holy Spirit's power to confront spiritua
Seventh-day Adventistaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Seventh-day Adventist tradition: the seventh-day Sabbath, the great-controversy theme, conditional immortality, sanctuary theology, and a historicist reading of prophecy.
Immediate meaning — Acts 13 recounts the formal commissioning of Paul and Barnabas by the Holy Spirit at Syrian Antioch and their subsequent missionary journey. They travel first to Cyprus, where Paul strikes Elymas the sorcerer blind, leading the proconsul to believe. They then proceed to Antioch of Pisidia. In the synagogue on the Sabbath, Paul delivers a sermon recounting Israel's history, the fulfillment of Davidic promises in Jesus, His crucifixion, and His resurrection. When the Jewish leaders reject the message of justification, the Gentiles eagerly request to hear the word on the following Sabbath. A massive citywide gathering on the next Sabbath provokes intense Jewish opposition, prompting Paul and Barnabas to officially turn their mission to the Gentiles before being expelled from the region.
Reception — Seventh-day Adventist reception of Acts 13 heavily centers on its implications for Sabbath continuity and the state of the dead. Regarding the Sabbath, Adventists view verses 14, 42, and 44 as definitive evidence that the apostolic church maintained the seventh-day Sabbath and knew nothing of Sunday sacredness. A characteristic Adventist argument emphasizes that when the Gentiles asked to hear the gospel (v. 42), Paul did not invite them to a Sunday service the very next day; instead, the entire city waited a full week to gather on the 'next Sabbath' (v. 44). Ellen G. White highlights these verses to demonstrate that the apostles continually honored the seventh-day Sabbath, utilizing it as the primary time for evangelizing both Jews and Gentiles. Furthermore, Paul’s statement that David 'fell asleep, was laid with his fathers, and saw corruption' (v. 36) is a standard prooftext for the Adventist doctrine of conditional immortality (often called soul sleep). Against the view of an immortal soul that immediately goes to heaven at death, Adventist apologetics uses this verse to affirm that the dead are entirely unconscious. They rest in the grave ('sleeping' and experiencing physical decay) until the future bodily resurrection, drawing a sharp contrast between the mortal David and the resurrected Christ, who alone 'saw no corruption' (v. 37).
Application — In Adventist practice, Acts 13 is utilized extensively for Sabbath apologetics, reassuring believers that their observance of the seventh-day Sabbath is authentically apostolic rather than a Jewish relic. The chapter also shapes pastoral care surrounding death, grounding the believer's hope solely in the bodily resurrection at Christ's return, rather than in an immaterial afterlife. Additionally, the narrative of Paul and Barnabas facing fierce opposition from Elymas and the envious religious leaders is read through the lens of the 'great controversy' theme, emboldening modern Adventist evangelists to expect and endure hostility while boldly offering the gospel to all nations.
Authorities named:Ellen G. White — The Acts of the Apostles · General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists — Seventh-day Adventists Answer Questions on Doctrine
claim-level audit (3 checks)
- ✓ The Gentile request to hear Paul on the next Sabbath, and the subsequent citywid
- ✓ Paul's description of David falling asleep and seeing corruption confirms that t
- ✓ The apostles' use of the synagogue gatherings shows that the seventh-day Sabbath
Restorationist / Churches of Christaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Restoration Movement tradition (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches — formally non-creedal): restore New Testament Christianity, 'speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent,' reading by direct command, apostolic example, and necessary inference; baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; the weekly Lord's Supper.
Immediate meaning — Acts 13 marks a pivotal narrative shift from the Jerusalem-centered Jewish mission to the Gentile mission led by Paul. The chapter begins with the church at Antioch, where prophets and teachers, guided by the Holy Spirit, fast, pray, and lay hands on Barnabas and Saul to send them out for a specific work. The narrative follows their journey to Cyprus, where Saul (now called Paul) confronts Elymas the sorcerer, resulting in the conversion of the Roman proconsul. The missionary band then travels to Antioch of Pisidia. Invited to speak in the synagogue, Paul delivers a major sermon summarizing Israelite history, connecting the Davidic promises to Jesus, proving Jesus' messiahship through the historical fact of His resurrection, and offering justification and the remission of sins. When faced with Jewish opposition and jealousy on the following Sabbath, Paul and Barnabas boldly announce their turn to the Gentiles, resulting in widespread Gentile belief and subsequent persecution that forces the missionaries to move on to Iconium.
Reception — In the Restoration Movement, Acts 13 is a crucial text for ecclesiology and soteriology, particularly read through the lens of apostolic example. Verses 1-3 are foundational for the tradition's understanding of missionary work and church autonomy. J.W. McGarvey and other early leaders argued that this passage establishes the local congregation as the sole authorized agency for sending out evangelists, a point of severe contention during the 19th-century controversies over creating extraneous missionary societies. Furthermore, the laying on of hands here is not interpreted as an 'ordination' conferring clerical authority—since Paul was already an apostle—but as a commendation to a specific localized work. Paul's synagogue sermon (vv. 16-41) is championed as a paradigmatic example of apostolic preaching: it relies on historical evidence and fulfilled prophecy rather than emotional appeal, culminating in the offer of 'remission of sins' (v. 38). While baptism is not explicitly commanded in this sermon, the tradition harmonizes the offer of pardon here with the consistent 'plan of salvation' revealed in Acts 2:38. Finally, verse 48 has been a major apologetic battleground against Calvinism. Where English translations say 'as many as were ordained to eternal life believed,' Restorationist scholars, rejecting unconditional predestination, have vehemently argued from the Greek verb 'tassō' that it means 'disposed' or 'determined.' Moses Lard and McGarvey contended that these Gentiles had set themselves in order or were inwardly disposed toward eternal life by their receptivity to the preached word, preserving human free will in salvation.
Application — Churches of Christ apply this chapter by modeling their evangelistic efforts on the Antioch church, often sending out missionaries directly from the local congregation with fasting, prayer, and the laying on of hands. Preachers are instructed to follow Paul's apostolic example by delivering reasoned, scripture-heavy sermons that present the historical facts of the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ as the basis for faith. The tradition also applies verse 48 by confidently preaching the gospel as a genuinely open invitation, assuring hearers that their eternal destiny is not locked by a prior divine decree, but hinges on their own willingness to be 'disposed' to the truth and obey the gospel.
Authorities named:J.W. McGarvey — New Commentary on Acts of Apostles · J.W. McGarvey — New Commentary on Acts of Apostles · Moses E. Lard — Lard's Quarterly
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ The actions of the Antioch congregation serve as an apostolic example establishi
- ✓ Paul's sermon provides a model for evangelistic preaching that relies on histori
- ✓ The phrase 'ordained to eternal life' is understood to mean that the individuals
- ✓ Congregations today should utilize prayer, fasting, and the laying on of hands w
Step 3Non-voting panels and comparative appendix
These inform the notes and the rendering, and are reported here, but they are never counted in the vote.
Academic textual-historical analysisaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Academic textual-historical analysis: philology and the original-language text, textual criticism, ancient Near Eastern (and, for the NT, Greco-Roman) context, literary genre and form, composition and dating debates, and reception history. Describe scholarly positions and their evidence without confessional commitment. This panel informs the textual notes and the rendering; it is never a church vote.
Immediate meaning — In its immediate literary and historical context, Acts 13 marks a pivotal structural shift in Hellenistic historiography, moving the narrative focus from Peter and the Jerusalem church to Paul and the Antioch-based mission. The chapter is framed as an itinerary, beginning with a list of diverse leaders in Antioch, including Manaen, a companion of Herod Antipas. The narrative follows Paul and Barnabas to Cyprus, where the encounter with the Jewish 'magian' Bar-Jesus (Elymas) and the Roman proconsul Sergius Paulus serves as an apologetic motif demonstrating the superiority of the Spirit over magic, and introducing the shift from the Hebrew name 'Saul' to the Roman 'Paul' (v. 9). The central piece is Paul's synagogue homily in Pisidian Antioch (vv. 16-41). Structured as a Hellenistic Jewish sermon, it recounts Israel's history (vv. 17-22), announces Jesus as the Davidic fulfillment (vv. 23-25), narrates his unjust death and vindicating resurrection (vv. 26-31), provides scriptural proofs from the Septuagint (Psalms 2 and 16, Isaiah 55), and concludes with an offer of forgiveness and a warning. The subsequent Jewish rejection and Gentile reception (vv. 46-48) provides the theological rationale for the Gentile mission, citing Isaiah 49:6.
Reception — Critical scholarship approaches Acts 13 primarily through the lenses of source criticism, historiography, and Pauline theology. Martin Dibelius analyzed the speech at Pisidian Antioch not as a verbatim transcript but as a Lukan composition designed to provide a programmatic summary of Paul's preaching to diaspora Jews, paralleling Peter's Pentecost speech. A major locus of debate is the use of 'justified' (dikaioō) in verse 39. Scholars like Ernst Haenchen and Hans Conzelmann argue that this verse represents a 'Lukanized' version of Paul's theology, reducing justification to the forgiveness of sins the Mosaic Law could not cover, which contrasts with the historical Paul's more radical forensic theology. Conversely, historians like Colin J. Hemer highlight Luke's precise use of contemporary administrative titles, such as correctly identifying Sergius Paulus as a 'proconsul' (anthypatos) in a senatorial province, which anchors the narrative in first-century Greco-Roman administrative realities. Text-critical analysis focuses on several variants, such as verse 18, where manuscripts divide between etropophorēsen ('put up with their manners', supported by P74, Sinaiticus, Vaticanus) and etrophophorēsen ('carried as a nurse', supported by Alexandrinus), as noted by Bruce M. Metzger.
Application — In academic application, Acts 13 serves as a foundational text for studying Luke's historiographical methodology and his theological agenda regarding salvation history. Scholars utilize the chapter to analyze the social dynamics of the first-century diaspora synagogue, particularly the role of 'God-fearers' (sebomenoi, vv. 43, 50) as a bridge for the Christian message into the Gentile world. Methodologically, the chapter is applied to trace the development of early Christian apologetics, the author's sophisticated integration of the Septuagint to construct Christological proofs, and the historical reconstruction of the Pauline mission's interaction with both Jewish institutions and Roman provincial authorities.
Authorities named:Martin Dibelius — Studies in the Acts of the Apostles · Ernst Haenchen — The Acts of the Apostles · Hans Conzelmann — Acts of the Apostles · Colin J. Hemer — The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History · Bruce M. Metzger — A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament
claim-level audit (7 checks)
- ✓ The chapter marks a narrative shift in Luke's historiography from Peter and Jeru
- ✓ The transition from the name Saul to the Roman cognomen Paul coincides with his
- ✓ The speech at Pisidian Antioch is analyzed as a Lukan composition providing a pr
- ✓ Scholars debate whether the justification language in verse 39 reflects genuine
- ✓ The author demonstrates historical precision by using the correct administrative
- ✓ Textual variants in verse 18 divide the manuscript tradition between 'put up wit
- ✓ The text is methodologically applied to study the social role of 'God-fearers' i
Jewish interpretationaudit ✓
Lens given to the model:Jewish interpretation of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible books only; do not treat the New Testament as Scripture, and address it only historically if at all). Distinguish rabbinic (Talmud, Midrash), medieval (Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and the classical mefarshim), and modern (including critical and denominational) voices rather than presenting one uniform Jewish position. This panel informs, and is reported, but never a Christian church vote.
Immediate meaning — Because Acts is a New Testament text, Jewish tradition does not regard it as Scripture. Instead, Jewish scholars and historians approach Acts 13 as a valuable, albeit rhetorically shaped, historical window into first-century diaspora Judaism. The narrative records recognizable early synagogue customs in Pisidian Antioch: the community gathers on the Sabbath, reads sequentially from the Law (Torah) and the Prophets (Haftarah), and the leaders invite capable visitors to offer a word of exhortation (vv. 14-15). The text also highlights the presence of 'God-fearers' (vv. 16, 26, 43, 50)—Gentiles who attached themselves to Jewish communities and monotheistic worship without undergoing full formal conversion. Additionally, the encounter with Bar-Jesus, a Jewish magus in Cyprus (v. 6), aligns with external historical evidence of Jewish involvement in esoteric practices in the Greco-Roman world.
Reception — In Jewish reception, Acts 13 is read critically as an artifact of the early 'parting of the ways.' Modern Jewish commentators note that Paul's speech (vv. 16-41) is a classic example of a Hellenistic Jewish homily (derashah). It surveys biblical history—the Exodus, the wilderness, the conquest, and King David—and employs standard midrashic techniques, stringing together proof-texts from Psalms and the Prophets to argue a messianic point. However, Jewish readers strongly critique the narrative framework surrounding the speech. The assertion that the Jews of Jerusalem 'knew him not, nor the voices of the prophets which are read every sabbath' (v. 27), followed by the diaspora Jews being 'filled with envy' and blaspheming (v. 45), is identified as Lukan apologetic and anti-Jewish polemic. This framing serves a supersessionist agenda, explaining the shift of the Jesus movement away from the Jewish people and toward the Gentile world (vv. 46-47).
Application — Acts 13 has no canonical, liturgical, or devotional application in Judaism. Because it falls outside the Tanakh, it is utilized exclusively as an academic and historical source. Jewish historians study the chapter to reconstruct the social realities of the Roman-era diaspora, the mechanics of early synagogal liturgy, and the theological divergence that led to the separation of early Christianity from its Jewish matrix.
Authorities named:Amy-Jill Levine and Marc Zvi Brettler (eds.) — The Jewish Annotated New Testament · Shaye J.D. Cohen — From the Maccabees to the Mishnah
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ The text provides historical evidence for first-century diaspora synagogue pract
- ✓ The term 'God-fearers' points to the historical reality of Gentiles attached to
- ✓ Paul's speech utilizes Jewish midrashic and homiletical techniques to recount Is
- ✓ The narrative's depiction of Jewish jealousy and rejection reflects the author's
Comparative appendix — outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster (Latter-day Saint, Jehovah's Witnesses)
Latter-day Saint
Lens given to the model:Latter-day Saint reading (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints): the Bible read alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, with living prophets and continuing revelation, and the Joseph Smith Translation where relevant. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Immediate meaning — In its immediate narrative context, Acts 13 describes the functioning of the early Christian church in Antioch, highlighting the roles of prophets and teachers. The Holy Ghost directs the separation of Barnabas and Saul for missionary work, which is solemnized by fasting, prayer, and the laying on of hands. The chapter follows their journey to Cyprus, where Paul dramatically blinds the false prophet Elymas through the power of the Holy Ghost, and then to Pisidian Antioch. There, Paul delivers a major synagogue sermon linking Israelite history to the resurrection of Jesus, emphasizing justification through Christ rather than the Law of Moses. Upon being rejected by Jewish leaders, Paul and Barnabas turn their ministry to the Gentiles and ritualistically shake the dust off their feet as a testimony against their persecutors.
Reception — Latter-day Saint reception of Acts 13 centers heavily on priesthood authority, the mechanics of divine calling, and the preservation of moral agency. Verses 2-3 are read as foundational texts for the doctrine of being 'set apart.' Latter-day Saint theology distinguishes between holding priesthood office and being authorized for a specific calling; Barnabas and Saul already held authority, but the laying on of hands in Antioch specifically set them apart for their missionary jurisdiction. This passage is frequently cited alongside the Fifth Article of Faith to demonstrate that administrative order—revelation ('the Holy Ghost said') followed by physical ordination ('laid their hands on them')—has always governed Christ's church. Verse 48 presents a theological challenge to the tradition's strong emphasis on free will, as standard translations read 'as many as were ordained to eternal life believed,' which implies predestination. The Joseph Smith Translation (JST) resolves this by inverting the phrase: 'as many as believed were ordained unto eternal life.' This reading subordinates ordination to individual agency and faith. Finally, the shaking off of dust in verse 51 is received not merely as a cultural idiom of frustration, but as a formal priesthood ordinance of judgment against those who willfully reject the gospel message, a concept explicitly reinforced in the Doctrine and Covenants.
Application — The pattern of Acts 13:2-3 dictates the exact administrative procedure for Latter-day Saint church callings today. Whether a person is called to be a local teacher or a global missionary, they are formally 'set apart' by the laying on of hands by an authorized priesthood leader, often accompanied by fasting and prayer. The JST reading of verse 48 is applied to teach that God's foreordination is contingent upon individual faithfulness and belief rather than an arbitrary decree. The practice of shaking off the dust of the feet (verse 51) is recognized as a valid apostolic and missionary ordinance, though modern application is strictly regulated and practically reserved for extreme, Spirit-directed circumstances rather than everyday missionary rejection.
Authorities named:Joseph Smith — Articles of Faith · Joseph Smith — Joseph Smith Translation (JST) · Bruce R. McConkie — Doctrinal New Testament Commentary
Jehovah's Witnesses
Lens given to the model:Jehovah's Witness reading (Watch Tower Society): attention to the divine name, God's Kingdom as a real government, conditional immortality, and a non-Trinitarian Christology. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Immediate meaning — The narrative details the beginning of Paul's first missionary tour, initiated by the direction of the holy spirit at the Antioch congregation. Barnabas and Saul travel to Cyprus, where they encounter demonic opposition from Elymas but successfully preach to the proconsul Sergius Paulus. Moving into Asia Minor, Paul delivers a major discourse in the synagogue at Antioch of Pisidia. He connects the history of Israel to the arrival, death, and resurrection of Jesus the Messiah. When the Jewish leaders reject the message out of jealousy, Paul and Barnabas boldly pivot their preaching to the non-Jewish nations, resulting in many Gentiles accepting the truth.
Reception — The Watch Tower Society reads this chapter heavily through the lens of non-Trinitarian theology, human free will, and the restoration of the divine name. In Acts 13:2, where the text says 'the Holy Spirit said,' Jehovah's Witnesses reject the idea of a literal third person of a Trinity speaking. Instead, they understand this as God's impersonal active force operating upon or communicating through the human prophets mentioned in verse 1. A hallmark of the New World Translation (NWT) is the restoration of the name 'Jehovah' in the Christian Greek Scriptures; in this chapter, 'Lord' (Kyrios) is rendered 'Jehovah' in several places (including verses 2, 10, 11, 12, 44, 47, 48, and 49) where the context points to God or quotes the Hebrew Scriptures. The tradition also places immense theological weight on Acts 13:48. Rejecting Calvinistic predestination, the NWT translates the verse to say 'all those who were rightly disposed for everlasting life became believers.' This rendering shifts the focus from divine pre-determinism to the individual's heart condition and exercise of free will. Additionally, Watch Tower chronology addresses the 'four hundred and fifty years' in verse 20 by favoring manuscript variants that apply this period to the time preceding the judges (from the choice of the patriarchs to the dividing of the land), thus harmonizing the timeline with Hebrew Bible chronologies regarding the Exodus.
Application — Jehovah's Witnesses use Acts 13 as a primary blueprint for their global evangelism. Paul and Barnabas are viewed as prototypical missionaries and traveling overseers, entirely devoted to expanding the Kingdom preaching work. Their boldness in the face of the false prophet Elymas is cited as an example of how modern Witnesses should stand firm against apostates and false religion. The concept of searching for those 'rightly disposed for everlasting life' (verse 48) drives their house-to-house ministry, teaching publishers to patiently look for honest-hearted individuals while recognizing that not everyone will accept the message. When facing intense opposition or rejection, Witnesses apply verse 51, 'shaking the dust off their feet,' which is interpreted as a command to peacefully move on to the next territory without holding personal resentment, leaving the unresponsive individuals to God's judgment.
Authorities named:Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — "Bearing Thorough Witness" About God's Kingdom · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · New World Bible Translation Committee — New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (Appendix)
Step 4Establish the original-language basis
The rendering is built from the source text, not from the English majority.
Textual basis — Public-domain Greek New Testament
Divine names — Kyrios (Lord), Theos (God)
- v18: ἐτροποφόρησεν (bore their manners / put up with them) vs. ἐτροφοφόρησεν (carried them as a nurse).
- v20: The Greek places 'ὡς ἔτεσιν τετρακοσίοις καὶ πεντήκοντα' (about 450 years) before 'ἔδωκεν κριτὰς' (he gave judges), locating the 450 years in the prior period. Some traditions (e.g., Textus Receptus) shift this phrase after 'after these things', making it the duration of the judges.
- v23: ἤγαγεν (brought) vs. ἤγειρεν (raised).
- v26: ἡμῖν (to us) vs. ὑμῖν (to you).
- v33: τοῖς τέκνοις αὐτῶν ἡμῖν (to their children, to us) vs. τοῖς τέκνοις αὐτῶν (to their children) vs. τοῖς τέκνοις ἡμῶν (to our children).
- v42: Ἐξιόντων δὲ αὐτῶν ἐκ τῆς συναγωγῆς τῶν Ἰουδαίων (As they were going out of the synagogue of the Jews) vs. TR's Ἐξιόντων δὲ ἐκ τῆς συναγωγῆς τῶν Ἰουδαίων (As the Jews went out of the synagogue).
- v44: τὸν λόγον τοῦ κυρίου (the word of the Lord) vs. τὸν λόγον τοῦ θεοῦ (the word of God).
- v1: Repetition/Polysyndeton: 'τε... καὶ... τε... καὶ' connecting the names.
- v2: Particle: 'δή' (now/then/indeed) in 'ἀφορίσατε δή'.
- v3: Repetition: Aorist participles joined by 'καὶ' ('νηστεύσαντες καὶ προσευξάμενοι καὶ ἐπιθέντες').
- v4: Definite-article pattern: 'τοῦ ἁγίου τοῦ πνεύματος' (the Spirit the Holy).
- v6: String of appositive nouns: 'ἄνδρα τινὰ μάγον ψευδοπροφήτην Ἰουδαῖον' (a certain man, a magus, a false prophet, a Jew).
- v8: Cognate framework: 'διαστρέψαι' (to pervert/turn aside), setting up the cognate participle in verse 10.
- v9: Definite-article wordplay: 'ὁ καὶ Παῦλος' (the [one] also [called] Paul).
- v10: Interjection: 'ὦ' (O); Repetition: 'πάσης ... πάσης ... πάσης' (all deceit ... all mischief ... all righteousness); Cognate repetition: 'διαστρέφων' (perverting, echoing v. 8).
- v11: Interjection/particle: 'καὶ νῦν ἰδοὺ' (and now behold).
- v13: Definite-article idiom: 'οἱ περὶ τὸν Παῦλον' (the [ones] around Paul).
- v14: Number shift: 'τῇ ἡμέρᾳ τῶν σαββάτων' (the day of the sabbaths - plural).
- v15: Formulaic address: 'ἄνδρες ἀδελφοί' (men brothers); Cognate pattern: 'λόγος ... λέγετε' (word ... speak/say).
- v16: Formulaic address: 'ἄνδρες Ἰσραηλῖται' (men Israelites).
- v21: Number echo: 'ἔτη τεσσεράκοντα' (forty years), structurally recalling the 40 years of v. 18.
- v22: Number shift: 'τὰ θελήματά μου' (my wills - plural).
- v24: Idiom: 'πρὸ προσώπου τῆς εἰσόδου αὐτοῦ' (before the face of his entrance).
- v25: Interjection: 'ἰδοὺ' (behold).
- v26: Formulaic address: 'Ἄνδρες ἀδελφοί' (Men brothers).
- v27: Definite-article bracketing: 'τὰς φωνὰς τῶν προφητῶν τὰς κατὰ πᾶν σάββατον ἀναγινωσκομένας'.
- v29: Definite-article grouping: 'πάντα τὰ περὶ αὐτοῦ γεγραμμένα' (all the things having been written concerning him).
- v30: Number shift: 'ἐκ νεκρῶν' (from dead [ones] - plural).
- v32: Definite-article bracketing: 'τὴν πρὸς τοὺς πατέρας ἐπαγγελίαν γενομένην' (the to the fathers promise having been made).
- v33: Pronoun chiasm: 'υἱός μου εἶ σύ, ἐγὼ σήμερον γεγέννηκά σε' (Son of me are you, I today have begotten you).
- v34: Repetition: 'διαφθοράν' (corruption) - first of four occurrences defining the argument; Definite-article bracketing: 'τὰ ὅσια Δαυὶδ τὰ πιστά'.
- v35: Repetition: 'διαφθοράν' (corruption).
- v36: Repetition: 'διαφθοράν' (corruption).
- v37: Repetition: 'διαφθοράν' (corruption).
- v38: Formulaic address: 'ἄνδρες ἀδελφοί' (men brothers).
- v39: Cognate verb sequence: 'δικαιωθῆναι ... δικαιοῦται' (to be justified ... is justified).
- v41: Interjection/imperative: 'ἴδετε' (behold/see); Figura etymologica: 'ἔργον ἐργάζομαι' (work a work).
- v42: Idiomatic phrasing: 'εἰς τὸ μεταξὺ σάββατον' (into the between/next sabbath).
- v45: Cognate repetition/polyptoton: 'ἀντέλεγον ... ἀντιλέγοντες' (spoke against ... speaking against).
- v46: Interjection: 'ἰδοὺ' (behold).
- v47: Idiomatic phrasing: 'ἕως ἐσχάτου τῆς γῆς' (unto the last/end of the earth).
- v50: Definite-article grouping: 'τὰς σεβομένας γυναῖκας καὶ τὰς εὐσχήμονας'.
Step 5Compare the translations, verse by verse
Each difference classified: textual · lexical · grammatical · interpretive · stylistic (the last only where it changes meaning).
- interpretivev1 spelling and phrasing for identifying the person — “who” (WEB, DARBY) vs “and Simeon that was” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “Symeon” (ASV) vs “who is” (YLT) vs “Simon who” (DRC)
- grammaticalv2 finite verb vs progressive participle for ministering — “As they ministered to” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “And were ministering” (DARBY, DRC) vs “served” (WEB) vs “And” (ASV) vs “and in their ministering” (YLT)
- grammaticalv2 finite verb vs participle for fasted — “fasted” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “fasting” (YLT, DARBY, DRC)
- lexicalv2 (vv 2, 52) Spirit vs Ghost — “Spirit” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Ghost” (KJV, DRC)
- interpretivev2 placement of the pronoun 'me' — “for” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “me for” (WEB) vs “to” (YLT) vs “and Barnabas” (DRC)
- stylisticv2 to which vs whereunto — “to which” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “whereunto” (KJV, ASV, DRC)
- lexicalv2 called vs taken — “called” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “taken” (DRC)
- grammaticalv3 finite verb vs participle for praying — “prayed” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “having” (YLT) vs “praying” (DRC)
- lexicalv3 laid vs imposing — “laid their” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “having the” (YLT) vs “having” (DARBY) vs “imposing” (DRC)
- stylisticv3 on vs upon — “on” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “upon” (DRC)
- lexicalv3 away vs go — “away” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “go” (DARBY)
- lexicalv5 preached vs proclaimed vs announced — “preached the” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “proclaimed God’s” (WEB) vs “proclaimed” (ASV) vs “declared” (YLT) vs “announced” (DARBY)
- lexicalv5 attendant vs minister vs ministrant — “as attendant” (WEB, ASV) vs “to their minister” (KJV) vs “as a ministrant” (YLT) vs “also as attendant” (DARBY) vs “for” (WEBSTER) vs “also in the ministry” (DRC)
- lexicalv6 sorcerer vs magian vs man — “sorcerer” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “man” (DARBY, DRC) vs “magian” (YLT)
- interpretivev6 spelling of the name Bar-Jesus — “was Bar–jesus” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Bar Jesus” (WEB) vs “is” (YLT) vs “Bar-jesu” (DRC)
- stylisticv7 who vs which — “who” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Which” (KJV)
- lexicalv7 (vv 7, 8) proconsul vs deputy — “proconsul” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “deputy of the country” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- lexicalv8 sorcerer vs magician vs magian — “sorcerer” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “magician” (DARBY, DRC) vs “magian” (YLT)
- interpretivev8 phrasing of the translation of the name — “by interpretation withstood them” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “interpreted” (YLT) vs “is opposed” (DARBY) vs “is interpreted” (DRC)
- stylisticv9 But vs Then vs And — “But” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “Then” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “And” (YLT)
- lexicalv10 guile vs deceit vs subtilty — “guile” (ASV, YLT, DRC) vs “deceit” (WEB, DARBY) vs “subtilty” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- lexicalv10 righteousness vs justice — “righteousness wilt thou” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “will you” (WEB) vs “justice ceasest” (DRC)
- lexicalv10 ways vs paths — “ways” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “paths” (DARBY)
- stylisticv11 behold vs lo and phrasing of Lord's hand — “behold the” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “lo a” (YLT) vs “Lord's” (DARBY)
- stylisticv11 upon thee vs on you — “upon thee” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “on you” (WEB)
- stylisticv11 thou shalt vs you will — “thou shalt” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you will” (WEB)
- grammaticalv12 participle vs finite temporal clause for seeing — “proconsul” (WEB, ASV) vs “deputy when he saw” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “proconsul having seen” (YLT) vs “proconsul seeing” (DARBY) vs “proconsul had seen” (DRC)
- lexicalv12 teaching vs doctrine — “teaching” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “doctrine” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
- interpretivev13 spelling of the geographic name Perga — “Perga in” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “of” (YLT, DARBY) vs “Perge” (DRC)
- grammaticalv13 participle vs finite verb for departed — “departing” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “departed” (WEB, ASV) vs “having departed” (YLT) vs “separated” (DARBY)
- lexicalv13 returned vs turn back — “and” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “returned” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “did turn back” (YLT)
- lexicalv14 departed vs passing through — “departed from Perga they” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “passing through” (ASV, DARBY) vs “passing on” (WEB) vs “having gone through” (YLT) vs “passing through Perge” (DRC)
- stylisticv14 of vs in — “of” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “in” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
- grammaticalv14 participle vs finite verb for went/entering — “They” (WEB, ASV) vs “and went” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “entering” (DARBY, DRC) vs “having gone” (YLT)
- stylisticv15 (vv 15, 31, 51) to vs unto — “to” (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto” (KJV, ASV, YLT)
- grammaticalv15 (vv 15, 41) phrasing of the conditional clause — “ye have any” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB, DRC) vs “there be a” (YLT)
- stylisticv15 for vs unto vs to — “for” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “unto” (YLT) vs “to” (DARBY) vs “to make to” (DRC)
- stylisticv15 speak vs say on — “speak” (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “say on” (KJV, ASV, YLT)
- grammaticalv16 participle vs finite verb for rising — “stood up” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “rising” (DARBY, DRC) vs “having risen” (YLT)
- grammaticalv16 possessive pronoun vs definite article — “his” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the” (ASV, YLT, DARBY)
- stylisticv16 vocative phrasing for men of Israel — “Men of Israel” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “Israelites” (YLT, DARBY) vs “Ye” (DRC)
- grammaticalv16 relative clause vs participle for fearing God — “ye that fear” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “you who” (WEB) vs “those fearing” (YLT) vs “you” (DRC)
- lexicalv16 hearken vs listen — “hearken” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “give audience” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “listen” (WEB) vs “ear” (DRC)
- textualv17 this people vs the people — “this” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “the” (DRC)
- lexicalv17 high vs uplifted arm — “an high” (KJV, YLT, DRC) vs “a” (ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “uplifted” (WEB)
- stylisticv17 of it vs from thence — “of it” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “from thence” (DRC)
- grammaticalv18 phrasing of the time period — “And about the time” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “For a period” (WEB) vs “for” (ASV) vs “a period” (YLT) vs “for a” (DARBY) vs “for space” (DRC)
- lexicalv18 wilderness vs desert — “wilderness” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “desert” (DARBY, DRC)
- lexicalv21 asked for vs desired — “asked for” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “desired” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
- interpretivev21 spelling of the name Kish — “Kish” (WEB, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “Cis” (KJV, DRC) vs “Kis” (DARBY)
- stylisticv22 to vs of — “to” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “of” (DARBY)
- stylisticv22 my vs after mine own — “my” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “according to My” (YLT, DRC) vs “after mine own” (KJV)
- grammaticalv22 relative clause phrasing for doing will — “who do” (ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “who will do” (WEB) vs “which shall fulfil” (KJV) vs “who fulfill” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv22 singular vs plural for will — “will” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “wills” (DRC)
- stylisticv23 Of vs From — “Of” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “From” (WEB)
- interpretivev24 repentance vs penance vs reformation — “repentance” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “reformation” (YLT) vs “penance” (DRC)
- grammaticalv25 imperfect vs aorist/perfect rendering for fulfilling — “was fulfilling” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “fulfilled his” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “was fulfilling the” (YLT)
- stylisticv25 cometh vs comes — “behold there cometh one” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “comes” (WEB, DARBY) vs “lo he doth come” (YLT)
- interpretivev25 relative pronoun phrasing for whose feet — “whose” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “his feet” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “whom” (YLT)
- lexicalv26 Abraham vs Abraham's race — “Abraham” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Abraham's race” (DARBY)
- stylisticv26 those vs whosoever — “those” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “whosoever” (KJV, DRC) vs “those who” (DARBY) vs “whoever” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv26 verb vs participle for fear — “feareth” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “fear” (DARBY, DRC) vs “who fear” (WEB) vs “that fear” (ASV) vs “fearing” (YLT)
- grammaticalv27 phrasing of the participle for those dwelling — “those who in” (WEB, DARBY) vs “they that dwell at” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “in” (ASV) vs “those dwelling in” (YLT) vs “inhabited” (DRC)
- lexicalv27 voices vs words — “voices” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “words” (WEBSTER)
- stylisticv28 of vs for — “of” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “for” (WEB)
- grammaticalv29 singular vs plural phrasing for things — “things were” (WEB, ASV, DRC) vs “that was” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “the things” (YLT) vs “things” (DARBY)
- stylisticv29 of vs about vs concerning — “of” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “about” (WEB, YLT) vs “concerning” (DARBY, WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv29 finite verb vs participle for took — “they took” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “having taken” (YLT) vs “taking” (DRC)
- lexicalv29 tree vs cross — “tree and laid” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “they” (YLT, DRC) vs “cross put” (DARBY)
- lexicalv29 tomb vs sepulchre — “tomb” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “sepulchre” (KJV, DARBY, DRC) vs “sepulcher” (WEBSTER)
- stylisticv30 from vs out of — “from” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “out of” (YLT) vs “among” (DARBY) vs “up” (DRC)
- grammaticalv31 phrasing of the relative and temporal clause — “for” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “And he was seen” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “who appeared for” (DARBY) vs “Who for” (DRC)
- lexicalv32 declare vs bring — “declare unto” (KJV, DARBY, DRC) vs “bring” (WEB, ASV) vs “to” (YLT, WEBSTER)
- textualv32 the fathers vs our fathers — “to” (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “unto the” (KJV, ASV, YLT) vs “to our” (DRC)
- stylisticv33 phrasing of the quotation introduction — “Thou art” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “You are” (WEB) vs “it hath been written” (YLT) vs “also is written” (DRC)
- stylisticv33 this day vs Today — “this day have” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Today” (WEB) vs “thou art” (YLT)
- lexicalv33 begotten vs become your father — “begotten thee” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “have become your father” (WEB) vs “to-day have” (YLT)
- stylisticv34 phrasing of 'spoken thus' — “said on this wise” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “has spoken thus” (WEB) vs “hath spoken” (ASV) vs “hath thus” (YLT) vs “spoke thus” (DARBY) vs “thus” (DRC)
- lexicalv34 sure mercies vs holy blessings — “holy and blessings” (WEB, ASV) vs “sure mercies” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “faithful kindnesses” (YLT) vs “faithful” (DARBY) vs “holy things” (DRC)
- stylisticv35 phrasing of 'he says' — “wilt” (ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “You will” (WEB) vs “psalm Thou shalt” (KJV) vs “place he saith” (YLT) vs “place also he saith” (DRC)
- lexicalv35 allow vs suffer vs give — “thy” (WEBSTER, DRC) vs “allow your” (WEB) vs “suffer thine Holy” (KJV) vs “give thy” (ASV) vs “give Thy kind” (YLT) vs “thy gracious” (DARBY)
- lexicalv35 (vv 35, 36) corruption vs decay — “corruption” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “decay” (WEB)
- grammaticalv36 phrasing of 'in his generation' — “in” (WEB, ASV) vs “after he had served” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “indeed” (YLT) vs “indeed having in” (DARBY) vs “when in” (DRC)
- lexicalv36 served vs ministered — “served” (WEB, ASV) vs “by” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “having served” (YLT) vs “ministered to” (DARBY) vs “according to” (DRC)
- lexicalv36 will vs counsel — “will” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “counsel” (WEB, ASV)
- lexicalv36 fell asleep vs slept — “asleep” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “fell on sleep and” (KJV) vs “did fall asleep” (YLT) vs “slept” (DRC)
- lexicalv36 laid with vs added to — “laid unto” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “with” (WEB) vs “added” (YLT) vs “added to” (DARBY) vs “to” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv40 Beware vs see — “Beware” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “see” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv41 despisers vs scoffers — “Behold ye despisers and” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you scoffers” (WEB) vs “See” (YLT)
- stylisticv43 Now when vs and — “Now when” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “and” (YLT, DARBY, DRC)
- lexicalv43 broke vs broken up vs dismissed — “synagogue broke” (WEB, ASV) vs “congregation was broken up” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “synagogue having been dismissed” (YLT) vs “of the synagogue having” (DARBY) vs “synagogue” (DRC)
- lexicalv43 persuaded vs urged — “persuaded” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “urged” (WEB, ASV) vs “were persuading” (YLT)
- lexicalv44 next vs coming — “next” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “coming” (YLT, DARBY)
- grammaticalv45 finite verb vs participle for seeing — “saw” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “seeing” (DARBY, DRC) vs “having seen” (YLT)
- lexicalv45 envy vs jealousy vs zeal — “envy” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “jealousy” (WEB, ASV) vs “zeal” (YLT)
- lexicalv45 contradicted vs spake against — “contradicted the” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “spake against those” (KJV) vs “did contradict the” (YLT) vs “spoke” (WEBSTER) vs “contradicted” (DRC)
- lexicalv46 eternal vs everlasting — “eternal” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “everlasting” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “the” (YLT)
- stylisticv46 lo vs behold — “lo” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “behold” (WEB, DRC) vs “age-during” (YLT)
- lexicalv46 Gentiles vs nations — “Gentiles” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “nations” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv47 commanded vs enjoined — “commanded” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “enjoined” (DARBY) vs “hath” (DRC)
- grammaticalv47 phrasing of 'for a light' — “for” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “thee to be a” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “you as” (WEB) vs “the” (DRC)
- stylisticv47 unto vs to — “unto” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DRC) vs “to” (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER)
- lexicalv47 ends vs uttermost parts — “ends” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “end” (YLT, DARBY) vs “uttermost parts” (WEB) vs “uttermost part” (ASV) vs “utmost part” (DRC)
- textualv48 word of the Lord vs word of God — “the Lord and” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “God” (WEB, ASV) vs “did believe” (YLT) vs “believed” (DARBY)
- lexicalv48 ordained vs appointed — “ordained” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “appointed” (WEB, YLT)
- lexicalv49 region vs country — “region” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “whole country” (DARBY, DRC)
- lexicalv50 chief men vs first people — “chief men” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “first” (YLT) vs “first people” (DARBY)
- lexicalv50 raised vs stirred up — “raised” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “stirred up a” (WEB, ASV) vs “did raise” (YLT) vs “a” (DARBY)
- lexicalv50 cast vs expelled vs threw — “cast” (ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “expelled” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “threw” (WEB) vs “did put” (YLT)
- stylisticv50 out of vs from — “out of” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “from” (YLT, WEBSTER)
- lexicalv50 borders vs coasts — “borders” (WEB, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “coasts” (KJV, DARBY, DRC)
- grammaticalv51 finite verb vs participle for shook — “shook” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “having shaken” (YLT, DARBY) vs “shaking” (DRC)
Step 6Synthesize — atomic claims, by family, not seat count
Every statement is split into the smallest testable claims; each eligible profile is AFFIRM / DENY / QUALIFY / SILENT on each.
The consensus
Broadly, Christian traditions affirm that the incorruptible bodily resurrection of Christ serves as the definitive historical fulfillment of the Davidic covenant promised in the Psalms. However, the commissioning of Paul and Barnabas is disputed, dividing traditions over whether the laying on of hands represents a sacramental transmission of Holy Orders or a functional commendation by a local, autonomous congregation without centralized hierarchical control. Another major dispute centers on the statement that as many as were ordained to eternal life believed, which divides traditions over whether saving faith is the direct result of God's unconditional eternal decree of election or if the phrase signifies that individuals freely yielded to divine grace. Meanwhile, several traditions highlight specific elements in the text, such as identifying the Antioch church's ministering with the celebration of the Eucharistic liturgy, viewing their fasting as a foundation for seasonal liturgical fasts, or asserting that Paul's sermon establishes justification as a forensic pardon received by faith alone distinct from the works of the Law.
Broad — SUPPORT in all but one family, that one undetermined
The incorruptible bodily resurrection of Christ serves as the definitive historical fulfillment of the Davidic covenant promised in the Psalms.
8 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 4 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation SUPPORTFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (8)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“St. Bede the Venerable notes how Paul utilizes Psalms 2 and 16 to prove that the incorruptibility of Christ's resurrected body is the definitive fulfillment of the Davidic covenant.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“In Pisidian Antioch, Paul preaches a synagogue sermon that recounts Israel's history, culminating in the declaration that Jesus fulfills the Davidic promises through His resurrection from the dead, a resurrection that definitively overcomes bodily corruption.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Paul testifies to Christ's unjust death and vindicating resurrection (vv. 27-30), interpreting the resurrection through the Psalms as the fulfillment of the incorruptible promise to David (vv. 33-37).” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Paul recounts Israel's history, culminating in God's promise to David, and proclaims that Jesus' resurrection fulfills this promise.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Paul's address rehearses Israel's history, identifies Jesus as the promised Davidic Savior, and interprets His death and resurrection as the fulfillment of scriptural prophecy.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Paul does not present Jesus as a novel rupture but as the fulfillment of the one covenant of grace, applying the 'sure mercies of David' (v. 34) directly to Christ's resurrection.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“In the synagogue on the Sabbath, Paul delivers a sermon recounting Israel's history, the fulfillment of Davidic promises in Jesus, His crucifixion, and His resurrection.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Paul delivers a major sermon summarizing Israelite history, connecting the Davidic promises to Jesus, proving Jesus' messiahship through the historical fact of His resurrection, and offering justification and the remission of sins.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Family-specific — characteristic of one family
The Greek term for 'ministering' (leitourgounton) used of the Antioch church refers specifically to the celebration of the Eucharistic liturgy.
3 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 9 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (3)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The Greek term for 'ministering' in verse 2 (*leitourgounton*) is universally recognized by the Fathers as denoting the Eucharistic liturgy.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Verse 2 is frequently cited in liturgical theology to underscore that mission and evangelism flow directly from the Eucharistic gathering.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The Greek word for 'ministering' in verse 2 is received liturgically as the celebration of the Eucharist, inextricably linking the Divine Liturgy, ascetic fasting, and the operations of the Holy Spirit.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The Antioch congregation's practice of fasting and prayer prior to commissioning establishes the scriptural foundation for seasonal liturgical fasts.
3 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 9 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (3)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The ancient practice of Ember Days in the Latin Church—seasons of fasting and prayer uniquely associated with the ordination of clergy—is a direct imitation of the Antioch community's fasting before laying hands on Paul and Barnabas.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Verses 2 and 3 provide the primary scriptural mandate for the 'Apostles' Fast' (known as Tsome Hawaryat in the Ethiopian tradition and Som al-Rusul in the Coptic).” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“The Antioch church's practice of fasting and praying before commissioning ministers (vv. 2-3) is the direct scriptural basis for the Ember Days—four seasonal periods set apart for prayer and fasting on behalf of those preparing for ordination.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Being 'filled with the Holy Spirit' is a dynamic, repeatable experience that empowers believers for specific prophetic actions and sustains experiential joy amidst persecution.
2 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Wesleyans pray for this same continuous filling of the Spirit, believing that true holiness produces an abiding joy that external circumstances, even severe persecution, cannot extinguish.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The descriptions of being 'filled with the Holy Spirit' in verses 9 and 52 highlight the Spirit's dynamic, repeatable empowering presence for specific prophetic actions and joyful endurance.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
The apostolic assertion that Christ 'saw no corruption' proves that His passible human body was preserved from physical decomposition in the tomb by virtue of the hypostatic union.
2 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“In Paul's sermon, the reliance on the Septuagint text of the Psalms to argue that Christ saw no 'corruption' (diaphthoran, verses 34-37) is central to the Orthodox understanding of salvation as victory over death and the incorruptibility of Christ's deified human nature.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Severus of Antioch argued from this apostolic witness that the Word freely assumed a genuinely passible, mortal human body that suffered true death. However, by virtue of the hypostatic union, that body was preserved from decomposition (decay) in the tomb.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
Paul's declaration that believers are 'justified from all things' establishes that justification is a forensic pardon received by faith alone, distinct from the works of the Law of Moses.
4 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 7 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation SUPPORTFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (5)
- Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“Evangelical Anglicans read Paul's declaration that believers are 'justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses' (vv. 38-39) as a definitive locus for Article XI of the Thirty-Nine Articles (Of the Justification of Man), closely aligning with John Stott's emphasis on the distinctively Pauline gospel.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Melanchthon argues that Paul sets up a direct dialectic between the impotence of the law and the efficacy of the gospel, showing that justification is synonymous with the forgiveness of sins and is received purely by faith in Christ.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Calvin notes that Paul contrasts the perfect righteousness found in Christ with the impotence of the Mosaic law, establishing that justification is a forensic declaration of pardon and right standing before God.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“The 'Second London Baptist Confession' relies on verses 38-39 to articulate the doctrine of justification by faith alone, emphasizing that Christ provides full remission of sins which the Law of Moses could not secure.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“John Wesley frequently appealed to verses 38-39 as a foundational definition of justification, emphasizing that it consists in the forgiveness of sins and is received entirely by faith, distinct from the works of the Mosaic law.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
Tradition-specific — one tradition only
The blinding of Elymas the sorcerer demonstrates that evangelism inherently involves power encounters where the Holy Spirit's authority tangibly overcomes demonic and occult opposition.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The confrontation with Elymas in verses 8-11 is a power encounter where Spirit-empowered prophetic judgment overcomes occult opposition and authenticates the Gospel message.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
The synagogue pattern of reading scripture followed by exhortation establishes the biblical framework for the daily liturgical reading of the Daily Office.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Additionally, the pattern of synagogue worship depicted in verse 15 (the reading of the law and prophets followed by exhortation) is traditionally seen as a biblical mirror for the synaxis of the Daily Office (Morning and Evening Prayer).”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
The application of the phrase 'Today I have begotten thee' to the resurrection demonstrates the single incarnate nature of the Word and the manifestation of His glory, precluding adoptive sonship.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Cyril insisted that this 'begetting' refers to the bodily resurrection and the public manifestation of Christ's glory, not a secondary or adoptive sonship, thereby safeguarding the single incarnate nature of the Word.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
Paul's description of David falling asleep and seeing corruption, contrasted with Christ, proves that deceased humans are entirely unconscious in the grave awaiting the bodily resurrection.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“They rest in the grave ('sleeping' and experiencing physical decay) until the future bodily resurrection, drawing a sharp contrast between the mortal David and the resurrected Christ, who alone 'saw no corruption' (v. 37).”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
The Gentile request to hear the gospel on the following Sabbath demonstrates that the apostolic church maintained continuous seventh-day Sabbath observance and did not practice Sunday worship.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The narrative of Paul preaching on consecutive Sabbaths to both Jews and Gentiles demonstrates the apostolic continuity of seventh-day Sabbath observance and the absence of Sunday worship.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
The apostolic act of shaking off the dust from their feet serves as a definitive model of nonviolent withdrawal and the proper nonresistant posture of the suffering church.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The apostles' response of shaking the dust off their feet when persecuted exemplifies the nonresistant posture of the true, suffering church.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
The act of shaking off the dust functions as a solemn, prophetic sign of detachment and a warning of the spiritual consequences of obstinately refusing the Gospel.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The apostolic act of 'shaking off the dust' (verse 51) is applied in Catholic spiritual theology not as an act of vindictive anger, but as a prophetic sign of detachment and a solemn warning of the spiritual consequences of obstinately refusing the Gospel.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Disputed — a family is mixed, or families affirm vs deny
The diverse list of prophets and teachers at Antioch establishes a biblical paradigm for inclusive, multi-ethnic, and shared non-hierarchical church leadership.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“Broad and progressive streams within the tradition increasingly highlight the multi-ethnic list of prophets and teachers at Antioch (v. 1)—including Simeon Niger and Lucius of Cyrene—as a paradigm for an inclusive, catholic church leadership.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The presence of diverse 'prophets and teachers' (13:1) is read as an endorsement of shared, plural leadership rather than a rigid hierarchy.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
The laying on of hands accompanied by fasting and prayer represents the sacramental transmission of Holy Orders and apostolic authority.
3 affirm · 1 deny · 2 qualify · 6 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDwho said what (6)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, the 'laying on of hands' (verse 3) is received dogmatically as the apostolic transmission of the Sacrament of Holy Orders (in the East, *cheirotonia*).” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Verse 3 is recognized as an early instance of sacramental ordination (cheirotonia) or commissioning via the laying on of hands, establishing apostolic succession.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Liturgically, the laying on of hands (v. 3) serves as the paradigm for the sacrament of Holy Orders, emphasizing that ordination must be accompanied by prayer and fasting.” - Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“Richard Hooker points to this passage to argue that even when an inward call is directly from the Holy Spirit, the Church requires an outward, orderly commission through the laying on of hands by proper authorities.” - Baptist · QUALIFY
“The acts of fasting, prayer, and laying on of hands are viewed as the local church's recognition of the Holy Spirit's internal call.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“Furthermore, the laying on of hands here is not interpreted as an 'ordination' conferring clerical authority—since Paul was already an apostle—but as a commendation to a specific localized work.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The commissioning of Paul and Barnabas demonstrates that the local, autonomous congregation possesses the authority to send out missionaries without centralized hierarchical control.
3 affirm · 1 deny · 0 qualify · 8 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (4)
- Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
“Richard Hooker points to this passage to argue that even when an inward call is directly from the Holy Spirit, the Church requires an outward, orderly commission through the laying on of hands by proper authorities.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“John L. Dagg, in his 'Manual of Church Order', points to the Antioch church as demonstrating that a local, autonomous congregation possesses the authority to ordain and commission missionaries without recourse to a higher bishopric or centralized hierarchy.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The opening verses establish Antioch as a paradigm of a localized, voluntary community operating independently of centralized ecclesiastical or state power.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“J.W. McGarvey and other early leaders argued that this passage establishes the local congregation as the sole authorized agency for sending out evangelists, a point of severe contention during the 19th-century controversies over creating extraneous missionary societies.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
The laying on of hands serves as a functional commendation by the local congregation to a specific missionary work, rather than an ordination to a clerical office.
1 affirm · 5 deny · 1 qualify · 5 silentAncient OPPOSEReformation OPPOSEFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (7)
- Catholic · DENY
“Furthermore, the 'laying on of hands' (verse 3) is received dogmatically as the apostolic transmission of the Sacrament of Holy Orders (in the East, *cheirotonia*).” - Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“Verse 3 is recognized as an early instance of sacramental ordination (cheirotonia) or commissioning via the laying on of hands, establishing apostolic succession.” - Oriental Orthodox · DENY
“Liturgically, the laying on of hands (v. 3) serves as the paradigm for the sacrament of Holy Orders, emphasizing that ordination must be accompanied by prayer and fasting.” - Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
“Ecclesiologically, the commissioning of Paul and Barnabas (vv. 2-3) is foundational for the Anglican understanding of holy orders.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“The fasting, praying, and laying on of hands by the prophets and teachers at Antioch is read as the normative pattern for ordination.” - Baptist · QUALIFY
“John L. Dagg, in his 'Manual of Church Order', points to the Antioch church as demonstrating that a local, autonomous congregation possesses the authority to ordain and commission missionaries without recourse to a higher bishopric or centralized hierarchy.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, the laying on of hands here is not interpreted as an 'ordination' conferring clerical authority—since Paul was already an apostle—but as a commendation to a specific localized work.”
- Catholic · DENY
The Holy Spirit's direct speech to the Antioch church demonstrates that the Spirit is a divine, personal agent who actively governs the church through ongoing prophetic direction.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 10 silentAncient LEANING-CONTESTEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
“The Orthodox tradition points to this as apostolic evidence for the Divine Liturgy, emphasizing that the Holy Spirit speaks and directs the Church precisely within the matrix of corporate liturgical worship and ascetic fasting.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Read within a Nicene Trinitarian framework, Pentecostals affirm the Holy Spirit as a fully divine, personal agent who actively governs the church.”
- Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
The assertion that 'as many as were ordained to eternal life believed' proves that saving faith is the direct, temporal consequence of God's unconditional eternal decree of election.
2 affirm · 3 deny · 3 qualify · 4 silentAncient LEANING-CONTESTEDReformation SUPPORTFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDwho said what (8)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“St. Thomas Aquinas marshals this verse to defend the doctrine of predestination, asserting that the act of saving faith is the temporal effect of God's eternal decree to give grace, a teaching the Magisterium holds in tension with the inviolable reality of human free will.” - Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“Finally, regarding verse 48 ('as many as were ordained to eternal life believed'), the tradition, articulated by John Chrysostom, vigorously rejects fatalistic predestination.” - Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“Furthermore, verse 48 ('as many as were ordained to eternal life believed') historically served as a prooftext for Reformed elements in the early English Church (reflecting Article XVII, Of Predestination and Election).” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“The confessors utilize this verse to demonstrate that saving faith is not a product of human free will or cooperation, but flows entirely from God's gracious, eternal predestination in Christ, which is made manifest through the external preaching of the Gospel.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“The Synod of Dort and the Westminster Confession of Faith cite 'as many as were ordained to eternal life believed' to demonstrate that saving faith is the fruit and consequence of God's eternal decree of election, not its cause.” - Baptist · QUALIFY
“Particular (Calvinistic) Baptists, such as John Gill in his 'Exposition of the Old and New Testaments', interpret this verse as an explicit defense of unconditional election, arguing that saving faith is the consequent fruit of God's sovereign predestination.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · DENY
“In the Wesleyan reading, these Gentiles had yielded to God's prevenient grace, placing themselves in a disposition to receive the Gospel, rather than being the subjects of an absolute eternal decree that excluded others.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“Where English translations say 'as many as were ordained to eternal life believed,' Restorationist scholars, rejecting unconditional predestination, have vehemently argued from the Greek verb 'tassō' that it means 'disposed' or 'determined.'”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
The phrase 'ordained to eternal life' signifies that the individuals had freely yielded to divine grace and were inwardly disposed to receive the gospel, refuting the doctrine of absolute predestination.
3 affirm · 3 deny · 2 qualify · 4 silentAncient MIXEDReformation OPPOSEFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (8)
- Catholic · DENY
“St. Thomas Aquinas marshals this verse to defend the doctrine of predestination, asserting that the act of saving faith is the temporal effect of God's eternal decree to give grace, a teaching the Magisterium holds in tension with the inviolable reality of human free will.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Instead, it reads 'ordained' (tetagmenoi) through the lens of synergy, understanding it to mean those who had 'disposed' or 'arrayed' themselves toward eternal life through their free cooperation with divine grace.” - Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“However, Caroline Divines, most notably Henry Hammond, famously re-exegeted this verse to mean 'disposed' or 'set in order' for eternal life, moving the tradition away from strict Calvinist double-predestination toward a theology that balances grace with human response.” - Lutheran · DENY
“The confessors utilize this verse to demonstrate that saving faith is not a product of human free will or cooperation, but flows entirely from God's gracious, eternal predestination in Christ, which is made manifest through the external preaching of the Gospel.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“John Calvin similarly argues from this verse that election cannot be based on foreseen faith, because the text deliberately makes belief the result of being 'ordained' to life.” - Baptist · QUALIFY
“In contrast, General Baptists have historically read the verse as referring to a disposition of the heart or God's foreknowledge, reflecting the tradition's internal diversity on the mechanics of personal conversion.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“In the Wesleyan reading, these Gentiles had yielded to God's prevenient grace, placing themselves in a disposition to receive the Gospel, rather than being the subjects of an absolute eternal decree that excluded others.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Moses Lard and McGarvey contended that these Gentiles had set themselves in order or were inwardly disposed toward eternal life by their receptivity to the preached word, preserving human free will in salvation.”
- Catholic · DENY
Paul's synagogue sermon models an evangelistic method that relies primarily on historical facts, fulfilled prophecy, and the bodily resurrection to produce faith.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Lutheran · QUALIFY
“Lutherans apply Acts 13 primarily to the theology of preaching, emphasizing that the public proclamation of the Word must mirror Paul's sermon by sharply distinguishing the law, which exposes sin and human inability, from the gospel, which delivers the forgiveness of sins and justification.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Preachers are instructed to follow Paul's apostolic example by delivering reasoned, scripture-heavy sermons that present the historical facts of the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ as the basis for faith.”
- Lutheran · QUALIFY
Step 7Render the New Consensus Bible
From the original-language text. The traditions document reception; they do not vote on wording. Every contested wording the rendering settled is listed below, not hidden.
1Now there were in Antioch, according to the existing church, prophets and teachers: both Barnabas and Simeon the one called Niger, and Lucius the Cyrenian, and Manaen a foster brother of Herod the tetrarch, and Saul. 2And as they were ministering to the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, "Separate now to me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them." 3Then having fasted and having prayed and having laid their hands on them, they let them go. 4So these indeed, having been sent out by the Holy Spirit, went down to Seleucia, and from there they sailed away to Cyprus. 5And having come to Salamis, they proclaimed the word of God in the synagogues of the Jews; and they also had John as an attendant. 6And having gone through the whole island to Paphos, they found a certain man, a magus, a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Bar-Jesus, 7who was with the proconsul, Sergius Paulus, an intelligent man. This man, having summoned Barnabas and Saul, sought to hear the word of God. 8But Elymas the magus (for so his name is interpreted) opposed them, seeking to pervert the proconsul from the faith. 9But Saul, the one also called Paul, having been filled with the Holy Spirit and having looked intently at him, 10said, "O full of all deceit and of all mischief, son of the devil, enemy of all righteousness, will you not cease perverting the right ways of the Lord? 11And now look, the hand of the Lord is on you, and you will be blind, not seeing the sun for a season." And immediately there fell on him a mist and a darkness, and going around he sought people leading him by the hand. 12Then the proconsul, having seen what had happened, believed, being astonished at the teaching of the Lord. 13And having set sail from Paphos, those around Paul came to Perga of Pamphylia. But John, having departed from them, returned to Jerusalem. 14But they, having passed through from Perga, came to Antioch of Pisidia, and having entered into the synagogue on the day of the sabbaths, they sat down. 15And after the reading of the law and of the prophets, the rulers of the synagogue sent to them, saying, "Men, brothers, if there is in you any word of exhortation for the people, speak." 16And Paul, having stood up and having motioned with his hand, said, "Men, Israelites, and those fearing God, listen: 17The God of this people Israel chose our fathers, and exalted the people in their sojourn in the land of Egypt, and with an uplifted arm he led them out of it; 18and for a period of about forty years he bore their manners in the wilderness, 19and having destroyed seven nations in the land of Canaan, he gave them their land for an inheritance 20for about four hundred and fifty years. And after these things he gave judges until Samuel the prophet. 21And from there they asked for a king, and God gave to them Saul the son of Kish, a man of the tribe of Benjamin, for forty years; 22and having removed him, he raised up David to them for a king, to whom also having testified he said, 'I have found David the son of Jesse, a man according to my heart, who will do all my wills.' 23From the seed of this man, according to a promise, God has brought to Israel a Savior, Jesus, 24John having previously proclaimed, before the face of his entrance, a baptism of repentance to all the people of Israel. 25And as John was fulfilling his course, he said, 'What do you suppose that I am? I am not he. But look, one is coming after me, the sandal of whose feet I am not worthy to untie.' 26"Men, brothers, sons of the race of Abraham, and those among you fearing God, to us the word of this salvation has been sent out. 27For those dwelling in Jerusalem and their rulers, having ignored him and the voices of the prophets the ones being read every sabbath, fulfilled them by judging him; 28and having found no cause of death, they asked Pilate for him to be put to death. 29And when they had completed all the things having been written concerning him, having taken him down from the tree, they laid him in a tomb. 30But God raised him from the dead ones, 31who appeared for many days to those who had come up with him from Galilee to Jerusalem, who are now his witnesses to the people. 32And we proclaim good news to you of the promise having been made to the fathers, 33that God has fulfilled this to us their children, having raised up Jesus; as it is also written in the second psalm: 'My Son are you, I today have begotten you.' 34And that he raised him from the dead ones, no longer about to return to corruption, he has spoken thus: 'I will give to you the holy things of David the faithful things.' 35Therefore also in another place he says: 'You will not give your Holy One to see corruption.' 36For David indeed, having served the counsel of God in his own generation, fell asleep, and was added to his fathers, and saw corruption; 37but he whom God raised up saw no corruption. 38Let it be known to you therefore, men, brothers, that through this one forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you, 39and from all things from which you were not able to be justified in the law of Moses, in this one everyone who believes is justified. 40See therefore that what is spoken in the prophets does not come upon you: 41'Look, you despisers, and wonder, and perish, because a work I work in your days, a work which you will by no means believe if anyone declares it to you.' 42And as they were going out of the synagogue of the Jews, the Gentiles kept begging that these words might be spoken to them on the between sabbath. 43And the synagogue having been dismissed, many of the Jews and of the devout proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas, who, speaking to them, were persuading them to remain in the grace of God. 44And on the coming sabbath almost all the city was gathered together to hear the word of the Lord. 45But the Jews, having seen the multitudes, were filled with jealousy, and spoke against the things being spoken by Paul, speaking against and blaspheming. 46And speaking boldly, Paul and Barnabas said, "It was necessary that the word of God be spoken to you first; but since you thrust it away and do not judge yourselves worthy of eternal life, look, we turn to the Gentiles. 47For so the Lord has commanded us: 'I have set you for a light of the Gentiles, for you to be for salvation to the last of the earth.' 48And the Gentiles, hearing this, rejoiced and glorified the word of the Lord, and believed, as many as had been appointed to eternal life. 49And the word of the Lord was being carried through the whole region. 50But the Jews stirred up the devout women and the prominent ones, and the first men of the city, and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and threw them out from their borders. 51But having shaken off the dust of their feet against them, they came to Iconium; 52and the disciples were filled with joy and with the Holy Spirit.
Choices made — every dispute the rendering settled
| Verse | Source | Options | Choice | Why | Cat. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | ὅ τε... καὶ... | "both Barnabas and" (YLT, S, A), "Barnabas and" (T) | "both Barnabas and" | Reflects the polysyndeton 'τε... καὶ...' in the source text. | grammatical |
| v2 | λειτουργούντων | "were ministering" (DARBY, DRC, S), "ministered" (T), "in their ministering" (YLT) | "were ministering" | Accurately translates the present participle in an ongoing periphrastic construction. | grammatical |
| v2 | πνεῦμα | "Spirit" (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, S, A), "Ghost" (KJV, DRC) | "Spirit" | Modernizes the term while maintaining the standard theological identification of the third person of the Trinity. | lexical |
| v2 | δή μοι | "now to me" (DARBY, S), "for me" / "to me" (T) | "now to me" | Translates the Greek particle 'δή' as 'now' indicating urgency or emphasis. | stylistic |
| v3 | προσευξάμενοι | "having prayed" (YLT, S), "prayed" (T), "praying" (DRC) | "having prayed" | Preserves the string of aorist participles in the source text syntax. | grammatical |
| v5 | κατήγγελλον | "proclaimed" (WEB, ASV, S, A), "preached" (T), "declared" (YLT), "announced" (DARBY) | "proclaimed" | Accurately reflects katēngellon as an authoritative public announcement. | lexical |
| v6 | μάγον | "magus" (S, A), "sorcerer" (T), "magian" (YLT), "magician" (DARBY, DRC) | "magus" | Preserves the historical specific term reflecting the religious/political role, rather than the generic 'sorcerer'. | lexical |
| v8 | ἀνθίστατο | "opposed" (DARBY, S), "withstood" (T) | "opposed" | Replaces the slightly archaic 'withstood' with a more standard contemporary equivalent. | lexical |
| v9 | ὁ καὶ Παῦλος | "the one also called" (S, A), "who is also called" (T), "otherwise" (DRC) | "the one also called" | Preserves the definite-article idiom 'ὁ καὶ Παῦλος' in the source text. | grammatical |
| v10 | δόλου | "deceit" (WEB, DARBY, DRC, S), "guile" (ASV, YLT), "subtilty" (KJV, WEBSTER) | "deceit" | Uses a more straightforward modern English term for dolos. | lexical |
| v11 | ἰδοὺ | "look" (S, A), "behold" (T), "lo" (YLT) | "look" | Updates the archaic exclamation 'behold' to modern 'look'. | stylistic |
| v13 | οἱ περὶ τὸν Παῦλον | "those around Paul" (YLT, S, A), "Paul and his company" (T), "Paul and they that were with him" (DRC) | "those around Paul" | Accurately renders the Greek idiom 'οἱ περὶ τὸν Παῦλον'. | grammatical |
| v14 | ἡμέρᾳ τῶν σαββάτων | "day of the sabbaths" (S, A), "sabbath day" (T), "sabbath" (WEBSTER) | "day of the sabbaths" | Preserves the specific plural form of 'sabbaton' found in the original text. | grammatical |
| v15 | ἄνδρες ἀδελφοί | "Men, brothers" (YLT, WEBSTER, DRC, S, A), "Brothers" (WEB, ASV), "Men and brethren" (KJV), "Brethren" (DARBY) | "Men, brothers" | Preserves the formulaic compound address 'andres adelphoi'. | stylistic |
| v17 | τούτου | "this people" (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, S), "the people" (DRC) | "this" | Translates the demonstrative pronoun 'toutou' supported by the Greek text. | textual |
| v18 | ἐτροποφόρησεν | "bore their manners" (KJV, WEBSTER, S), "put up with" (WEB), "nursed" (DARBY, ASV), "endured" (DRC) | "bore their manners" | Reflects the manuscript reading 'etropophoresen' (bore manners/put up with) rather than 'etrophophoresen' (nursed), keeping a dignified register. | textual |
| v22 | θελήματά | "wills" (DRC, S), "will" (T) | "wills" | Preserves the plural form 'thelemata' found in the Greek text. | grammatical |
| v24 | πρὸ προσώπου τῆς εἰσόδου αὐτοῦ | "before the face of his entrance" (S, A), "before his coming" (T), "before the face of his entry" (DARBY) | "before the face of his entrance" | Retains the idiomatic and Hebraic phrasing 'pro prosopou tes eisodou autou'. | grammatical |
| v27 | τὰς φωνὰς τῶν προφητῶν τὰς ... ἀναγινωσκομένας | "the voices of the prophets the ones being read" (S), "the voices of the prophets which are read" (T) | "the voices of the prophets the ones being read" | Preserves the definite-article bracketing of the participial phrase. | grammatical |
| v30 | ἐκ νεκρῶν | "from the dead ones" (S), "from the dead" (T) | "from the dead ones" | Preserves the plural number of 'nekrōn' in the source text. | grammatical |
| v32 | τὴν πρὸς τοὺς πατέρας ἐπαγγελίαν γενομένην | "the promise having been made to the fathers" (S), "the promise made to the fathers" (T) | "the promise having been made to the fathers" | Retains the bracketing effect of the articular aorist participle 'genomenen'. | grammatical |
| v33 | υἱός μου εἶ σύ | "My Son are you" (S), "You are my Son" (WEB), "Thou art my Son" (T) | "My Son are you" | Follows the emphatic pronoun and word-order chiasm of the Greek text. | stylistic |
| v34 | τὰ ὅσια Δαυὶδ τὰ πιστά | "the holy things of David the faithful things" (S), "the holy and sure blessings" (WEB, ASV), "sure mercies" (KJV, WEBSTER), "faithful kindnesses" (YLT) | "the holy things of David the faithful things" | Reflects the definite-article bracketing 'ta hosia Dauid ta pista' structurally. | grammatical |
| v39 | δικαιωθῆναι ... δικαιοῦται | "to be justified ... is justified" (S, A), "be justified ... is justified" (T) | "to be justified ... is justified" | Highlights the cognate verb sequence spanning the verse without resolving theological debate over specific atonement frameworks. | grammatical |
| v42 | μεταξὺ σάββατον | "between sabbath" (S), "next sabbath" (T), "ensuing sabbath" (DARBY) | "between sabbath" | Literally renders the idiomatic spatial/temporal term 'metaxy'. | lexical |
| v45 | ἀντέλεγον ... ἀντιλέγοντες | "spoke against ... speaking against" (S), "contradicted ... contradicting" (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC), "spake against ... contradicting" (KJV) | "spoke against ... speaking against" | Preserves the cognate repetition (polyptoton) of antilego. | grammatical |
| v47 | ἕως | "unto" (T), "to" (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER, S) | "to" | Replaces archaic 'unto' with modern 'to'. | stylistic |
| v48 | τοῦ κυρίου | "word of the Lord" (KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC, S), "word of God" (WEB, ASV) | "word of the Lord" | Follows the broader manuscript support (including P74, Aleph, A, B) for 'kyriou' rather than 'theou'. | textual |
| v48 | τεταγμένοι | "appointed" (WEB, YLT, S, A), "ordained" (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) | "appointed" | Accurately translates 'tetagmenoi', reflecting positioning or arrangement without resolving the theological dispute over absolute unconditional predestination versus free disposition. | lexical |
| v50 | τὰς σεβομένας γυναῖκας καὶ τὰς εὐσχήμονας | "the devout women and the prominent ones" (S), "the devout and prominent women" (T), "the women of the upper classes who were worshippers" (DARBY) | "the devout women and the prominent ones" | Preserves the separation by the definite article in Greek. | grammatical |
Limits worth knowing
- This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
- The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
- The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
- The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
- One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
- The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
- Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
- The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.