← Back to Mark 5 · Full Mark 5 study page
How the consensus for Mark 5 was built
Every step of the working, exactly as it ran. Nothing here is hand-edited: the translations came from this app’s database, each tradition’s reading was generated in isolated calls that do not see one another (isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses), and the consensus was synthesized from those readings alone.
- Model:
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)
- Generated:
- Jul 18, 2026, 5:49 PM UTC
- Method:
- claim-audited, source-language-based, family-weighted
Step 1Read the passage in every public-domain translation
7 translations, fed to every step. The AI-generated NCB is never a source.
WEB · World English Bible
KJV · King James Version
ASV · American Standard Version
YLT · Young's Literal Translation
Darby · Darby Translation
Webster · Webster Bible
DRC · Douay-Rheims (Challoner)
Step 2Each eligible tradition reads the chapter — 12 voting profiles across 3 families
Isolated AI-generated profiles that do not see one another. Genre-aware, and honest about thin material. Each reading is three layers — immediate meaning, reception, application — and every claim was checked against the source text before the vote.
Ancient Communions · The undivided-church and pre-Reformation episcopal traditions.
Catholicaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Roman Catholic tradition drawing on both Latin AND Eastern Catholic sources — and actually showing the Eastern dimension, not merely promising it: Scripture within Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium (the Catechism, the Latin Fathers, Augustine, Aquinas and the scholastics, the councils) together with the Eastern Catholic churches in communion with Rome and the Greek and Syriac Fathers they share. Sacramental and typological reading. Distinguish teaching shared across the whole Catholic communion from emphases specific to the Latin or to the Eastern Catholic churches.
Immediate meaning — Mark 5 presents three interconnected miracles demonstrating Jesus' sovereign power over demons, chronic disease, and death itself. The narrative moves from Gentile territory, where Jesus casts the 'Legion' of demons into a herd of swine, back to Jewish territory. The second half features an intercalation: on his way to heal the critically ill twelve-year-old daughter of Jairus, Jesus is interrupted by a woman who has suffered a hemorrhage for twelve years. Her touch of his garment elicits immediate healing. Upon reaching Jairus's house, Jesus raises the now-dead girl with an Aramaic command and orders that she be given food.
Reception — Catholic reception heavily emphasizes the sacramental and incarnational theology present in these miracles. The physical mediation of grace is a paramount theme. The Eastern Syriac tradition, exemplified by Ephrem the Syrian's commentary, highlights how the bleeding woman's touch demonstrates Christ's divine power flowing through the material reality of his garment, providing a foundation for the theology of physical sacraments and sacramentals. Latin reception, synthesized by Thomas Aquinas, frequently traces ecclesiological typology in the intercalated miracles: the twelve-year-old girl represents the Synagogue, while the bleeding woman represents the Gentile Church which approaches Christ from behind to be healed. Furthermore, Bede the Venerable interprets Christ's command to give the raised girl something to eat as a type for the Eucharist, teaching that those raised from the spiritual death of sin require the Sacrament of the Altar for sustenance.
Application — The chapter is applied liturgically and pastorally in several ways. The exorcism of the Gerasene demoniac informs the Church's understanding of spiritual warfare and the Rite of Exorcism, emphasizing Christ's absolute authority over demonic forces. The healing of the bleeding woman encourages devotion to the sacraments, sacramentals, and relics, teaching that faith expressed through physical proximity to sacred things mediates Christ's healing. Finally, the raising of Jairus's daughter is applied to the Sacrament of Penance, where the spiritually dead are restored to life by Christ's word, and then immediately directed to receive the Eucharist to sustain their renewed state of grace.
Authorities named: Ephrem the Syrian — Commentary on Tatian's Diatessaron · Bede the Venerable — Commentary on the Gospel of Mark · Thomas Aquinas — Catena Aurea
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ Christ's divine power is mediated through physical objects, establishing a prece
- ✓ The two healed females represent the Gentile Church and the Jewish Synagogue in
- ✓ The command to feed the resurrected girl is a typological instruction that those
- ✓ The narrative of raising the dead girl followed by a command to eat is applied t
Eastern Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Eastern Orthodox tradition: Scripture within Holy Tradition and the consensus of the Fathers (patristic consensus). Emphases on theosis, the liturgy, the Septuagint text, apophatic mystery over precise definition, and the seven Ecumenical Councils.
Immediate meaning — In its immediate narrative context, Mark 5 presents three profound demonstrations of Jesus' authority over forces that diminish or destroy human life: the demonic realm, chronic impurity/disease, and death itself. Jesus crosses into Gentile territory and exorcises a 'Legion' of demons from a man living among the tombs, permitting the spirits to enter a herd of pigs which then perish in the sea. Upon returning, He is interrupted on His way to heal the dying daughter of Jairus, a synagogue ruler, by a woman with a twelve-year hemorrhage. The woman is healed immediately by touching His garment in faith. After confirming her healing, Jesus proceeds to Jairus's house, ignores the mourners' ridicule, and raises the young girl from the dead, instructing them to give her food to prove the physical reality of her restoration.
Reception — Eastern Orthodox reception of Mark 5 reads these miracles profoundly through the lenses of the Incarnation, the theology of uncreated energies, and the material mediation of grace. The healing of the woman with the issue of blood (vv. 25-34) is a central text for Orthodox sacramental theology. The 'power' (dynamis) that Jesus perceives going out from Him (v. 30) is interpreted by theologians like Gregory Palamas as the uncreated divine energy, which is communicated to creation through the deified physical flesh of the incarnate Christ. Furthermore, because this divine energy healed the woman through the medium of His physical clothes, John of Damascus and later Byzantine defenders of icons cite this passage as definitive proof that matter is not inherently evil and can become a vehicle for divine grace, establishing the biblical foundation for the veneration of relics and holy objects. In the account of the Gerasene demoniac (vv. 1-20), patristic consensus, articulated prominently by John Chrysostom in his treatment of the synoptic accounts, points out that the demons' begging for permission to enter the swine demonstrates their total lack of independent authority. They cannot so much as touch animals without Christ's permissive will, emphasizing God's absolute sovereignty and the ultimate powerlessness of the demonic. The raising of Jairus's daughter (vv. 35-43) establishes the Orthodox eschatological view of death as a mere 'sleep' (koimesis) from which Christ will awaken humanity, prefiguring the general resurrection.
Application — In Orthodox application, this chapter profoundly informs the sacramental and ascetical life of the Church. The woman's touch of Christ's garment is applied directly to the Mysteries (Sacraments), particularly the Eucharist and Holy Unction, where believers physically touch and consume the life-giving body and blood of Christ for the healing of soul and body. Ascetically, the demoniac dwelling in the tombs represents the human nous (the eye of the soul) darkened by passions and spiritual death; his restoration to his 'right mind' sitting at the feet of Jesus is the goal of Orthodox psychotherapy and hesychastic prayer. Liturgically, the raising of Jairus's daughter reinforces the language used in Orthodox memorial services (Panikhida), where the departed are consistently referred to as 'those who have fallen asleep,' confessing faith in the coming resurrection.
Authorities named: Gregory Palamas — Triads in Defense of the Holy Hesychasts · John of Damascus — An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith · John Chrysostom — Homilies on Matthew
claim-level audit (6 checks)
- ✓ Jesus demonstrated authority over the demonic realm, chronic disease, and death
- ✓ The power that left Jesus to heal the woman is understood as God's uncreated div
- ✓ The healing through Christ's clothing establishes the theological premise that p
- ✓ The demons' request to enter the swine shows that the demonic realm is powerless
- ✓ The passage models the Orthodox approach to the Mysteries (Sacraments), where ph
- ✓ The narrative of the demoniac is read ascetically as the healing of the passion-
Oriental Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Oriental Orthodox tradition (Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac): Scripture within the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils and the miaphysite Fathers (Athanasius, Cyril of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch). Deeply liturgical, ascetic, and typological reading; some of these churches hold wider canons.
Immediate meaning — Mark 5 comprises three interlocking miracle narratives that demonstrate Jesus' absolute authority over demonic subjugation, chronic illness, and death. The chapter opens with the exorcism of the Gerasene demoniac, whose 'Legion' of unclean spirits is sent into a herd of swine. Following this, the text employs an intercalation (a narrative 'sandwich'): while Jesus is on his way to heal the dying daughter of Jairus, a synagogue ruler, a woman who has suffered from a hemorrhage for twelve years touches his garment and is immediately healed. Jesus perceives power going out from him and affirms her faith. He then proceeds to Jairus's house, ignores the mourners' ridicule, takes the deceased girl by the hand, and raises her back to life with a command.
Reception — The Oriental Orthodox tradition reads this chapter through a highly developed miaphysite Christological lens. For the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils, the miracles of Mark 5 are paramount demonstrations of the unified nature of the Incarnate Word. The healing power that goes out from Jesus (verse 30) and His taking the dead girl by the hand (verse 41) are not viewed as a divine nature acting independently of a human nature; rather, they are the single divine-human activity of the one Christ. Theologians like Severus of Antioch point to these physical acts of healing as proof of the 'life-giving flesh' (zoopoios sarx). The body of Christ itself radiates divine power because it is perfectly united with the Word. Furthermore, the Syriac tradition, exemplified by Ephrem the Syrian, extensively contrasts the faith of the woman with the hemorrhage against the physical pressing of the crowd. The crowd presses against His humanity without spiritual comprehension, but the woman's faith directly encounters the life-giving divine power united to His flesh.
Application — Liturgically and sacramentally, the physical mediations of healing in this chapter—the touch of a garment and the grasping of a hand—undergird the Oriental Orthodox reliance on material elements (water, oil, the Eucharistic elements) to transmit divine grace. The healing of the woman is frequently invoked in the Coptic and Syriac rites for the Unction of the Sick, presenting Christ as the supreme Physician who heals without medicine. Ascetically, the Gerasene demoniac is read as a profound typological figure of the human soul entirely subjugated by the passions, dwelling in the 'tombs' of spiritual death. His restoration to being 'clothed and in his right mind' represents the ascetic goal of inner unification and hesychia (stillness) achieved solely through the authoritative command of Christ. The healed demoniac's subsequent commission to proclaim Christ in the Decapolis is seen as the natural resulting vocation of a soul liberated from demonic influence.
Authorities named: Severus of Antioch — Cathedral Homilies · Ephrem the Syrian — Commentary on the Diatessaron
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ The raising of Jairus's daughter by the hand demonstrates that Christ's human fl
- ✓ Healing power went out from Christ not merely as a physical emanation, but was a
- ✓ The Gerasene demoniac serves as an ascetic type for the soul bound by passions a
- ✓ Christ's physical mediations of healing provide a theological basis for the Chur
Reformation Traditions · The magisterial churches of the sixteenth-century Reformation.
Anglican / Episcopalaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Anglican tradition (including the Episcopal Church): Scripture read with tradition and reason (Hooker); the Book of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles; a comprehensiveness spanning evangelical, anglo-catholic, and broad/progressive readings — name that spectrum where the passage has been read across it.
Immediate meaning — In this chapter, Jesus demonstrates supreme authority over three destructive forces that isolate human beings from their communities: demonic possession in a Gentile territory, chronic ritual impurity, and death. The narrative utilizes an intercalated (sandwiched) structure to link the healing of the bleeding woman with the raising of Jairus's daughter, emphasizing that physical touch, previously associated with the transmission of impurity, becomes the conduit for Christ's restoring power. Faith is presented as the vital catalyst for these life-giving encounters.
Reception — The chapter is read across the comprehensive spectrum of Anglicanism, with different wings highlighting distinct theological facets. The Evangelical tradition, typified by J. C. Ryle, places heavy emphasis on the contrast between the multitude that merely 'thronged' Jesus and the woman who touched him with saving faith, using this to distinguish outward religious observance from inward, active trust. Conversely, the Anglo-Catholic tradition views the transmission of 'virtue' or power through Jesus' garments as profoundly incarnational, pointing to it as a scriptural defense for sacramental theology—the belief that God uses material elements to mediate spiritual grace. In the Broad and Progressive traditions, scholars like Rowan Williams draw attention to the socio-political and psychological dimensions of the text. 'Legion' is recognized as a term of imperial military occupation, framing the exorcism as a liberation from systemic oppression, while all three miracles are celebrated for restoring marginalized individuals to their families, communities, and social agency.
Application — Anglican pastoral theology relies heavily on this chapter to ground its healing ministries. The physical mediation of Christ's healing power informs the rites of the Ministration to the Sick in the Book of Common Prayer, particularly the laying on of hands and unction. Additionally, Jesus' command to the healed demoniac to 'go home to thy friends' is frequently utilized to encourage lay evangelism, validating the testimony of ordinary believers in their everyday domestic spheres.
Authorities named: J. C. Ryle — Expository Thoughts on Mark · Rowan Williams — Meeting God in Mark · The Episcopal Church — The Book of Common Prayer (1979)
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The woman's touch is contrasted with the pressing crowd to distinguish between s
- ✓ The flow of power from Jesus' clothing is interpreted as an incarnational endors
- ✓ The name 'Legion' is understood to carry imperial overtones, framing the exorcis
- ✓ The passage provides the biblical foundation for Anglican liturgies of healing,
- ✓ The dismissal of the healed demoniac to his home is applied as a model for lay e
Lutheranaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Lutheran tradition (the Book of Concord): the law–gospel distinction, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura held with the ecumenical creeds, the theology of the cross, and sacramental realism.
Immediate meaning — Mark 5 recounts three miracles demonstrating Jesus' absolute authority over the forces that destroy human life: the demonic, chronic disease, and death. In Gentile territory, Jesus frees a man possessed by a 'Legion' of demons, sending the spirits into a herd of swine, which provokes fear and rejection from the locals. Returning across the sea, Jesus is urgently summoned by Jairus to heal his dying daughter. En route, a woman suffering from a twelve-year hemorrhage—rendering her perpetually unclean and financially ruined—touches Jesus' garment in secret and is instantly healed. Jesus halts to publicly confirm her faith. While delayed, Jairus receives word his daughter has died. Jesus dismisses the tragedy as mere sleep, faces the mockery of the mourners, and raises the girl to life with a simple command.
Reception — The Lutheran tradition reads this chapter as a profound illustration of Christology, justification by faith, and the distinction between law and gospel. The helplessness of the demoniac, the bleeding woman, and the dead girl typifies the human condition under the Law: completely bound by Satan, incurable by human effort, and spiritually dead. Christ enters this condition as the pure Gospel, bringing deliverance from the outside through His efficacious Word. The narrative of the bleeding woman is heavily utilized in Lutheran Christology to defend sacramental realism and the communication of attributes (communicatio idiomatum). Theologians like Martin Chemnitz point to Jesus sensing 'power proceeding from him' (v. 30) when the woman touched His clothes as proof that Christ's human nature is completely infused with divine, life-giving majesty (finitum capax infiniti). Just as divine power was mediated physically through His body and garment, Lutheran dogmatics assert that Christ's body and blood truly mediate forgiveness and life in the Eucharist. Furthermore, the chapter serves as a central locus for sola fide. Jesus' declarations, 'Thy faith hath made thee whole' (v. 34) and 'Fear not, only believe' (v. 36), are interpreted as defining the nature of justifying faith. Faith is not a meritorious work, but a receptive organ that clings solely to Christ's promise, even when the evidence of the senses and human reason (the doctors' failure, the daughter's apparent death, the mocking crowd) contradict it.
Application — Lutheran application emphasizes pastoral care in the face of suffering and death. When confronted with physical death or despair, Christians are taught to model Jairus and the bleeding woman by clinging strictly to the external Word of Christ ('only believe') rather than their own feelings or dire circumstances. The declaration that the girl 'is not dead, but sleepeth' (v. 39) is frequently used in Lutheran funeral preaching to comfort mourners that, in Christ, death has been reduced to a temporary slumber from which the believer will be easily awakened. Additionally, the sacraments are presented to the laity as the contemporary 'hem of His garment'—tangible, physical means through which they can touch Christ and receive His healing power for the forgiveness of sins.
Authorities named: Martin Chemnitz — The Two Natures in Christ · Martin Luther — Church Postil
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ The human inability to cure the woman's hemorrhage or bind the demoniac illustra
- ✓ The physical transmission of power through Jesus' garment is evidence that His h
- ✓ Jesus' statements 'your faith has made you well' and 'only believe' prove that f
- ✓ Death for the believer is transformed by Christ's word into a mere sleep, from w
Reformed / Presbyterianaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Reformed tradition (Calvin; the Westminster Standards; the Heidelberg and Belgic confessions): the sovereignty of God and covenant theology, a redemptive-historical reading of Scripture, and the regulative principle.
Immediate meaning — Mark 5 narrates three powerful demonstrations of Jesus's authority over forces that diminish and destroy human life. First, in the Gentile region of the Gerasenes, Jesus encounters a man possessed by a 'Legion' of demons. He exercises absolute command over the spirits, granting their request to enter a herd of pigs, which then rush into the sea. Returning across the lake, Jesus is implored by Jairus, a synagogue ruler, to heal his dying daughter. While Jesus is on the way, a woman who has suffered from chronic bleeding for twelve years touches His garment and is instantly healed. Jesus stops to elicit her public confession. During this delay, Jairus's daughter dies, but Jesus proceeds to the house and raises the girl back to life.
Reception — Reformed theology reads Mark 5 through the distinct lenses of God's absolute sovereignty and the redemptive-historical mission of the Mediator to reverse the curse of the Fall. In his 'Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists', John Calvin utilizes the account of the Gerasene demoniac to articulate the Reformed doctrine of providence regarding evil. Calvin argues that the demons' plea to enter the swine (vv. 12-13) decisively proves that Satan and his agents are completely bridled by God's sovereign decree; they can do absolutely nothing without Christ's explicit permission. The subsequent destruction of the pigs highlights the inherently destructive malice of Satan, which God restrains for the protection of humanity. In interpreting the healing of the bleeding woman, the Reformed tradition focuses on the nature of saving faith. Calvin notes that her belief that physical contact with Christ's garment was necessary (v. 28) was mixed with a degree of superstition or theological error. However, because her faith was fundamentally directed toward the true Redeemer, Christ graciously accommodated her weakness, honoring her faith and correcting her understanding by attributing the healing to her trust in Him (v. 34). Redemptive-historically, commentators like William Hendriksen read these three miracles not merely as isolated acts of compassion, but as eschatological signs: Christ the Covenant King is actively inaugurating His kingdom by comprehensively subduing demonic tyranny, incurable disease, and death itself.
Application — Pastorally, the Reformed tradition draws deep comfort from this chapter regarding the security of the believer. Because the forces of hell cannot so much as enter a herd of pigs without the sovereign permission of Christ, believers are assured that Satan cannot harm them outside of God's overarching providence. The story of the bleeding woman is frequently applied to comfort Christians burdened by weak or imperfect faith; it teaches that it is the object of faith (Christ), rather than the flawless execution of that faith, that secures grace. Finally, the healed demoniac's commission (v. 19) is applied as a paradigm for ordinary Christian witness, calling believers to testify to their communities about the sovereign mercy the Lord has shown them.
Authorities named: John Calvin — Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists · John Calvin — Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists · William Hendriksen — Exposition of the Gospel According to Mark
claim-level audit (6 checks)
- ✓ The demons' request to enter the pigs demonstrates that demonic forces are subje
- ✓ The bleeding woman's belief that she needed to touch Jesus's garment contained t
- ✓ The chapter functions redemptive-historically to display Christ's systematic rev
- ✓ Believers are comforted that demonic forces cannot act against them without God'
- ✓ Christians are encouraged that weak or imperfect faith is acceptable to Christ a
- ✓ The delivered demoniac serves as a model for believers to declare God's merciful
Free-Church & Revival Traditions · Believers'-church, revival, and restorationist movements.
Baptistaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Baptist tradition (e.g. the 1689 Second London Confession, the Baptist Faith & Message — note the range): believers' baptism, congregational polity, liberty of conscience, a memorial reading of the ordinances, and strong emphasis on personal conversion and biblical authority.
Immediate meaning — The chapter is a narrative recording three interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus's absolute authority over the most terrifying human afflictions: demonic subjugation, incurable chronic illness, and death itself. Jesus casts a legion of demons out of a Gerasene man into a herd of swine, heals a woman with a twelve-year issue of blood who touches his garment in a crowd, and raises the twelve-year-old daughter of Jairus, a synagogue ruler, from the dead. In each instance, fear and despair are countered by Jesus's sovereign word and the necessity of faith.
Reception — The Baptist tradition reads this chapter predominantly through the lens of personal conversion and unmediated faith. Rather than viewing the woman's touch of Christ's garment as evidence of sacramental or mediated grace, Baptist expositors sharply distinguish between the crowd that merely pressed against Jesus physically and the woman who touched Him with personal, active faith. John Gill famously argued that her faith, not the fabric, was the instrument of her healing, prefiguring the doctrine of justification by faith alone. Similarly, the healing of the Gerasene demoniac is widely interpreted as a paradigm of radical regeneration. The man's transition from uncontrollable depravity to sitting 'clothed, and in his right mind' is heralded as the hallmark of the new birth. Furthermore, Jesus's refusal to let the healed man accompany Him in the boat, instead commanding him to 'go home to thy friends, and tell them,' is deeply ingrained in Baptist theology as the foundation for personal evangelism and the believer's testimony. Charles Spurgeon frequently preached this passage to emphasize that every converted individual, regardless of theological training, possesses an immediate duty and capacity to declare the Gospel.
Application — Baptists frequently apply this chapter in evangelistic preaching, urging listeners to move beyond mere proximity to the church (the 'thronging crowd') and to exercise a personal, saving faith in Christ (the 'touch'). The Gerasene demoniac's commission is routinely used to train congregations in personal evangelism, emphasizing that sharing one's own conversion story—what great things the Lord has done—is the most fundamental form of missionary work. Pastors also use Jesus's words to Jairus, 'only believe,' to comfort believers facing seemingly impossible grief or terminal circumstances.
Authorities named: John Gill — Exposition of the New Testament · Charles Spurgeon — Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ Jesus possesses ultimate, sovereign authority over spiritual forces, chronic phy
- ✓ The physical restoration of the demoniac represents the spiritual reality of rad
- ✓ Healing and salvation are secured through unmediated, personal faith rather than
- ✓ Every believer has a mandate to share their personal testimony of Christ's mercy
- ✓ In the face of extreme tragedy or apparent finality, believers are called to per
Methodist / Wesleyan / Holinessaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Wesleyan-Holiness tradition: prevenient grace and free response, sanctification and entire sanctification / Christian perfection, the Wesleyan quadrilateral (Scripture primary, with tradition, reason, and experience), and warm-hearted practical piety.
Immediate meaning — In its immediate narrative context, Mark 5 presents a triptych of Jesus' sovereign authority over forces that overwhelm human capacity: the chaotic evil of the demonic Legion in Gentile territory, a chronic flow of blood causing permanent ritual impurity, and the ultimate boundary of death in Jairus's daughter. The chapter highlights the crossing of social and religious boundaries, the necessity of active faith in the face of despair, and the physical transmission of divine power ('virtue') that restores individuals to their communities.
Reception — The Wesleyan-Holiness tradition has deeply internalized Mark 5 as a multi-layered illustration of soteriology, particularly regarding justification, the restoration of the imago Dei, and sanctification. John Wesley and early Methodist commentators like Adam Clarke read the Gerasene demoniac's restoration to his 'right mind' (v. 15) as a profound metaphor for the spiritual sanity that accompanies justifying grace, contrasting it with the inherent madness and self-destruction of a life governed by sin. Furthermore, the woman with the issue of blood is viewed through the lens of prevenient grace and human response: her healing illustrates the synergy of faith. While she must exercise the volition to reach out (vv. 27-28), it is explicitly Christ's power or 'virtue' (v. 30) that affects the cure. In the later Holiness movement, the woman's twelve-year suffering and failure of all other physicians (v. 26) was often typologically applied to the believer's frustrating struggle with inbred sin, which cannot be cured by human effort but only by an immediate, faith-filled encounter with Christ that brings entire sanctification.
Application — Methodist practical piety heavily emphasizes Jesus' command to the delivered demoniac: 'Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee' (v. 19). This serves as a foundational biblical mandate for the practice of personal testimony, which was the lifeblood of early Methodist class meetings and band societies. Believers are instructed that experiencing God's grace carries a corresponding duty to declare it, starting within their own households. Additionally, Jesus' word to Jairus, 'Fear not, only believe' (v. 36), is frequently invoked in Wesleyan pastoral care as an exhortation to maintain faith when sensory evidence and circumstances dictate despair.
Authorities named: John Wesley — Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament · Adam Clarke — Commentary on the Bible
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ The deliverance of the demoniac and his subsequent state of sitting 'in his righ
- ✓ Jesus' command to the delivered man establishes a mandate for believers to decla
- ✓ The healing of the woman with the issue of blood demonstrates that Christ's powe
- ✓ Jesus' instruction to Jairus models the persistence of faith required of believe
Anabaptist / Mennoniteaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Anabaptist tradition (Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite): a Jesus-centered reading with the Sermon on the Mount as normative, believers' baptism, nonviolence and nonresistance, simple living, communal discernment, and the church as a visible community distinct from worldly power.
Immediate meaning — In Mark 5, the narrative follows Jesus demonstrating authority over three formidable forces: demons, chronic illness, and death. Crossing into Gentile territory, Jesus encounters a violently possessed man who lives among the tombs, breaking the chains meant to restrain him. The demons identify themselves as 'Legion' and beg to be sent into a herd of swine, which subsequently rushes into the sea and drowns. The local people, terrified by the economic loss and the dramatic change in the now-peaceful man, ask Jesus to leave. Back in Jewish territory, Jesus is approached by Jairus to heal his dying daughter. En route, a woman suffering from a hemorrhage for twelve years touches Jesus' garment and is instantly healed; Jesus commends her faith. Upon arriving at Jairus's house, Jesus dismisses the mocking mourners and raises the child from the dead.
Reception — The Anabaptist tradition reads this chapter with a strong focus on Jesus' nonviolent confrontation with oppressive 'powers and principalities.' Mennonite biblical scholarship frequently interprets the Gerasene demoniac episode as both a spiritual exorcism and a socio-political subversion. Willard Swartley emphasizes the heavily militarized language in the text, noting that 'Legion' directly invokes the Roman occupying army. The man's self-mutilation and broken chains are seen as the trauma and futility of living under—and trying to violently resist—empire. Jesus does not use greater violence to subdue the man; rather, he liberates him with a peaceful, authoritative word. The drowning of the swine (an animal ritually unclean to Jews and a known mascot for the Roman Tenth Fretensis Legion) evokes the Exodus narrative of Pharaoh's armies drowning in the sea, framing Jesus as inaugurating a new, nonviolent liberation. Furthermore, the Gerasenes' request for Jesus to leave demonstrates how societies often prefer familiar, managed violence and economic stability over the disruptive, transformative peace of the Kingdom of God. In the subsequent healings, Anabaptist readers highlight Jesus' willingness to cross strict religious purity boundaries (touching a bleeding woman and a corpse) to prioritize human restoration over legalism.
Application — Anabaptist communities apply this chapter to their commitments to peacemaking, nonresistance, and holistic witness. The restored demoniac—found 'sitting, clothed, and in his right mind' (v. 15)—is viewed as the archetypal picture of the peaceable kingdom, contrasting sharply with the world's failed attempts to control violence with chains and fetters (v. 4). The church is challenged to examine where it might resemble the fearful townspeople, prioritizing economic security (the pigs) over the liberation of the marginalized. Additionally, Jesus' instruction to the healed man to remain and tell his community what the Lord has done (v. 19) serves as a foundational model for Anabaptist evangelism: witnessing to God's restorative mercy through transformed, nonviolent living within local communities. The healing of the bleeding woman is applied as a call for the church to extend visible, boundary-crossing compassion to those socially isolated by medical or structural vulnerabilities.
Authorities named: Willard M. Swartley — Mark: The Way for All Nations (Believers Church Bible Commentary) · Willard M. Swartley — Mark: The Way for All Nations (Believers Church Bible Commentary)
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The demonic name 'Legion' is interpreted as a direct reference to the occupying
- ✓ The failure of chains and fetters to tame the man contrasts with Jesus' ability
- ✓ The destruction of the swine and the subsequent fear of the locals reveals a hum
- ✓ Jesus commissioning the healed man to return home is treated as a paradigm for w
- ✓ Jesus' healings of the bleeding woman and Jairus's daughter demonstrate a kingdo
Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal tradition (Assemblies of God, Church of God, and kindred bodies): the present continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine healing, and expectancy of God's present action, read within Nicene Trinitarian faith. Do NOT attribute Word-of-Faith / prosperity or later neo-charismatic distinctives to classical Pentecostalism generally.
Immediate meaning — In this narrative chapter, Jesus crosses the Sea of Galilee into Gentile territory and encounters a severely demonized man. Jesus demonstrates absolute authority over a 'Legion' of unclean spirits, casting them into a herd of swine and restoring the man to his right mind (verses 1-20). Returning to the Jewish side, Jesus is implored by a synagogue ruler, Jairus, to heal his dying daughter (verses 21-24). En route, a woman who had suffered from a chronic hemorrhage for twelve years touches His garment in faith, instantly drawing healing power from Him (verses 25-34). Despite receiving news that Jairus's daughter has died, Jesus commands the father to 'only believe' and proceeds to raise the girl from the dead (verses 35-43).
Reception — Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalism receives Mark 5 as a definitive revelation of Christ's total victory over demonic oppression, chronic disease, and death. Against theological liberalism, the tradition reads the Gerasene demoniac narrative as establishing the literal, destructive reality of demonic forces and Jesus' supreme, uncontested authority to subjugate them (verses 1-13). The healing of the woman with the issue of blood serves as a central paradigm for the Pentecostal theology of divine healing. Her healing underscores that 'virtue' (Greek *dunamis*, often translated as power) is a tangible reality that responds directly to active, expectant faith (verses 27-30). Figures such as Smith Wigglesworth (*Ever Increasing Faith*) utilized this pericope to argue that faith acts as a necessary catalyst, actively reaching out to draw physical healing from Christ (verse 34). Furthermore, Jesus' word to Jairus, 'Fear not, only believe' (verse 36), is a hallmark text for the Pentecostal understanding of faith, teaching that divine promises and Christ's power override empirical, negative natural evidence (verse 35).
Application — Pentecostals apply this chapter heavily in the praxis of divine healing and deliverance. The woman's determination to touch Jesus' garment is frequently invoked in preaching and healing lines, exhorting believers to 'press in' and touch the Lord by faith, expecting a present-day transfer of healing power. The mandate to 'only believe' (verse 36) functions as a ubiquitous pastoral encouragement to maintain faith during severe crises or negative medical reports. In deliverance ministry, the Gerasene narrative is applied to demonstrate that no degree of spiritual bondage is beyond the liberating power of Jesus, and that demons must immediately yield to His command.
Authorities named: Smith Wigglesworth — Ever Increasing Faith
claim-level audit (3 checks)
- ✓ Jesus' encounter with the Gerasene demoniac establishes the literal reality of d
- ✓ The woman with the issue of blood demonstrates that active, expectant faith draw
- ✓ Jesus' command to Jairus to 'only believe' establishes a pastoral and theologica
Seventh-day Adventistaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Seventh-day Adventist tradition: the seventh-day Sabbath, the great-controversy theme, conditional immortality, sanctuary theology, and a historicist reading of prophecy.
Immediate meaning — The narrative recounts three distinct but interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus' supreme authority over forces that diminish or destroy human life: spiritual bondage, chronic illness, and death. He frees a Gadarene man possessed by a legion of demons, sending them into a herd of swine; he heals a woman who had suffered from a hemorrhage for twelve years after she touches his garment; and he raises the twelve-year-old daughter of Jairus, a synagogue ruler, from the dead.
Reception — Seventh-day Adventist reception of Mark 5 heavily engages two of the tradition's defining theological lenses: the great-controversy theme and conditional immortality. The account of the Gadarene demoniac is widely read as a microcosm of the cosmic conflict. Ellen G. White emphasized that the demoniac's self-mutilation and madness represent Satan's ultimate design to degrade and destroy humanity, while the man sitting 'clothed, and in his right mind' (Mark 5:15) demonstrates Christ's mission to restore the divine image in humanity. The loss of the swine is seen as Satan's tactic to incite the townspeople to reject Jesus. Furthermore, the resurrection of Jairus's daughter is a primary text for the Adventist understanding of the state of the dead. Jesus' declaration, 'the damsel is not dead, but sleepeth' (Mark 5:39), is taken literally by the tradition to support conditional immortality (often termed 'soul sleep'). Adventists argue this verse proves that death is an unconscious state of rest, rather than the separation of an immortal soul from the body. The deceased is entirely unconscious, 'sleeping' until awakened by the life-giving command of Christ (Mark 5:41).
Application — Adventists apply this chapter practically in areas of evangelism, faith, and grief. The formerly possessed man, who is instructed to 'Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee' (Mark 5:19), is held up as a model for lay evangelism; believers are taught that personal testimony of Christ's restorative power is often the most effective witness. The woman with the issue of blood serves as a homiletic illustration of the difference between casual association with the church (the pressing crowd) and active, saving faith (the intentional touch). Finally, the doctrine of soul sleep drawn from verse 39 is applied pastorally to comfort grieving families, assuring them that their dead loved ones are resting peacefully and unconsciously until the resurrection morning.
Authorities named: Ellen G. White — The Desire of Ages · Ministerial Association of the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists — Seventh-day Adventists Believe
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ The narrative of the demoniac is viewed as a vivid illustration of the great-con
- ✓ Jesus' description of the dead girl as sleeping is interpreted as definitive pro
- ✓ Jesus' command to the healed demoniac to share his story at home serves as a fou
- ✓ The woman's touch of Jesus' garment is applied to teach the necessity of active,
Restorationist / Churches of Christaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Restoration Movement tradition (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches — formally non-creedal): restore New Testament Christianity, 'speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent,' reading by direct command, apostolic example, and necessary inference; baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; the weekly Lord's Supper.
Immediate meaning — In Mark 5, Jesus demonstrates absolute authority over the spiritual realm, physical disease, and death through three distinct miracles. He exorcises a legion of demons from a man in the Gerasene region, sending the spirits into a herd of pigs which then perish in the sea. After being asked to leave the region by the frightened locals, Jesus crosses back over the sea. He is approached by Jairus, a synagogue ruler, whose daughter is dying. While en route to Jairus's house, a woman who has suffered from a bleeding condition for twelve years touches his garment in faith and is instantly healed. Despite receiving news that Jairus's daughter has died, Jesus proceeds to the home, dismisses the mourners, and raises the girl back to life.
Reception — The Restoration Movement, particularly Churches of Christ, historically approaches Mark 5 through an evidentialist hermeneutic. Commentators in this tradition read these miracles as literal, historical facts recorded specifically to produce rational faith in Jesus as the Son of God. J.W. McGarvey and P.Y. Pendleton emphasize the sheer, undeniable power Jesus exercises over all categories of human suffering and supernatural oppression, viewing the text as a foundational apologetic defense of Christ's divinity. Furthermore, the mechanics of faith are highly scrutinized in this chapter. C.E.W. Dorris notes that the woman with the issue of blood possessed a faith that drove her to physical action (touching the garment); her faith was not merely intellectual ascent but was 'active' and 'obedient,' a recurring thematic requirement for salvation in Restorationist theology. B.W. Johnson highlights the instruction given to the healed demoniac (verses 19-20) as a pivotal moment, noting it as an early, localized commission to proclaim God's grace in the Gentile region of the Decapolis, contrasting the man's eager obedience with the fearful rejection of his townsfolk.
Application — In Churches of Christ, Mark 5 is frequently preached to illustrate the destructive nature of sin (mirrored by the demoniac's self-harm and isolation) and the total restorative power of Jesus. The chapter is applied as a prime example of the necessity of an active, seeking faith. The woman who pressed through the crowd to touch Jesus is held up as a model for the sinner who must actively respond to the gospel call rather than waiting passively. Additionally, Jesus' command to Jairus, 'only believe' (verse 36), is applied to encourage believers facing insurmountable grief or fear, with the understanding that such belief inherently involves continued obedience and trust in Christ's word. The healed demoniac's return to his friends to report the Lord's mercy is heavily utilized as a straightforward pattern for personal evangelism.
Authorities named: J.W. McGarvey and P.Y. Pendleton — The Fourfold Gospel · C.E.W. Dorris — A Commentary on the Gospel According to Mark · B.W. Johnson — The People's New Testament
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ Jesus demonstrates absolute authority over supernatural forces, chronic physical
- ✓ The miracles provide historical, factual evidence intended to serve as apologeti
- ✓ The woman's physical act of touching Jesus' garment demonstrates that biblical f
- ✓ The healed demoniac's obedience in telling his friends about Jesus models the na
- ✓ Believers are exhorted to overcome paralyzing fear by maintaining a steadfast, a
Step 3Non-voting panels and comparative appendix
These inform the notes and the rendering, and are reported here, but they are never counted in the vote.
Academic textual-historical analysisaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Academic textual-historical analysis: philology and the original-language text, textual criticism, ancient Near Eastern (and, for the NT, Greco-Roman) context, literary genre and form, composition and dating debates, and reception history. Describe scholarly positions and their evidence without confessional commitment. This panel informs the textual notes and the rendering; it is never a church vote.
Immediate meaning — 1. IMMEDIATE MEANING: Academic analysis of Mark 5 identifies three major episodes structured as one independent pericope followed by an intercalation, or 'Markan sandwich.' The first narrative (vv. 1-20) details the healing of the demoniac in the Decapolis region. Scholars point out a significant textual and geographical problem in verse 1: the best early manuscripts read 'Gerasenes' (Gerasa), which is located over thirty miles southeast of the Sea of Galilee, making a steep plunge into the sea impossible. Later scribes attempted to correct this to 'Gadarenes' (closer) or 'Gergesenes' (on the shore). The use of the Latin loanword 'Legion' (v. 9) carries heavy military and political connotations, likely reflecting the Roman occupation. The second section (vv. 21-43) interleaves the healing of a woman with a hemorrhage (vv. 25-34) inside the raising of Jairus's daughter (vv. 21-24, 35-43). The narrative links the two women through the number twelve (the duration of the woman's bleeding in v. 25 and the age of the girl in v. 42), the theme of faith, and the issue of ritual impurity regarding both continuous menstrual bleeding and touching a corpse. Philologically, the retention of the transliterated Aramaic phrase 'Talitha cumi' (v. 41) suggests the author utilized early Palestinian traditions while translating them for a Greek-speaking audience.
Reception — 2. RECEPTION: Within historical-critical and literary reception, Mark 5 is frequently analyzed to deduce the compositional techniques of the Gospel's author and the socio-political environment of early Christianity. Post-colonial scholars often read the Gerasene demoniac episode as an anti-imperial political allegory. They note that the Legio X Fretensis, the Roman legion that occupied Jerusalem and the surrounding region, used a wild boar as one of its primary emblems; thus, Jesus casting a 'Legion' into a herd of swine that is then drowned in the sea is interpreted as a subversive, veiled wish for the expulsion of Roman occupiers. Redaction critics examine how Matthew and Luke relied on this chapter, noting that Matthew heavily compresses the narrative, doubles the demoniacs, and alters Mark's rough Greek style, demonstrating Markan priority. Feminist and socio-historical critics analyze the intercalation of the bleeding woman and Jairus's daughter to highlight how the Markan Jesus systematically dismantles ancient purity boundaries (as outlined in Levitical law) that marginalized women. Textual critics use the geographical anomalies in the opening verse as a primary example of how early transmission history involved scribal attempts to harmonize or 'correct' the author's lack of familiarity with Palestinian topography.
Application — 3. APPLICATION: Academically, this chapter is applied in New Testament curricula as a textbook paradigm for teaching the literary technique of intercalation (the 'Markan sandwich'), for demonstrating the methods of textual criticism regarding geographical variants, and for exploring how first-century writers used apocalyptic and miracle forms to critique socio-political realities like the Roman occupation.
Authorities named: Bruce M. Metzger — A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament · Ched Myers — Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark's Story of Jesus · James R. Edwards — Markan Sandwiches: The Significance of Interpolations in Markan Narratives (Novum Testamentum) · Marla J. Selvidge — Woman, Cult, and Miracle Recital: A Redactional Critical Investigation on Mark 5:24-34
claim-level audit (6 checks)
- ✓ Early manuscripts read 'Gerasenes' in verse 1, which presents a geographical err
- ✓ The term 'Legion' uses a Latin loanword that carries military connotations indic
- ✓ The text employs an intercalation structure, inserting the story of the bleeding
- ✓ The two healing stories are connected by the number twelve, appearing as the dur
- ✓ The inclusion of the phrase 'Talitha cumi' demonstrates the retention of an Aram
- ✓ Post-colonial analysis views the drowning of the pigs as a subversive anti-imper
Jewish interpretationthin materialaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Jewish interpretation of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible books only; do not treat the New Testament as Scripture, and address it only historically if at all). Distinguish rabbinic (Talmud, Midrash), medieval (Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and the classical mefarshim), and modern (including critical and denominational) voices rather than presenting one uniform Jewish position. This panel informs, and is reported, but never a Christian church vote.
Immediate meaning — As Mark 5 is part of the New Testament, it is not recognized as Scripture in Judaism. From a historical and academic perspective, modern Jewish scholars analyze this chapter to illuminate its first-century Galilean Jewish context. The narratives feature prominent Jewish purity concerns, including contact with tombs (corpse impurity), swine, severe, chronic menstrual bleeding (niddah), and a dead body. Academic readers note that Jesus' actions in these healings—such as being touched by the hemorrhaging woman or holding the dead girl's hand—are often framed by later commentators as rejections of Jewish law, whereas Jewish scholars emphasize that the act of healing itself naturally resolves the source of the ritual impurity without inherently abrogating the Torah.
Reception — There is no canonical or theological reception of this text within rabbinic, medieval, or modern religious Judaism, as it falls entirely outside the Tanakh. In modern historical scholarship, however, Jewish commentators evaluate the Gospel's depiction of miracle working to understand first-century Judaism. Scholars compare Jesus' authoritative commands, notably the preserved Aramaic phrase 'Talitha cumi,' to the traditions of charismatic Galilean holy men (Hasidim) such as Hanina ben Dosa or Honi the Circle-Drawer. Furthermore, the narrative of the Gerasene demoniac is frequently read by Jewish historians as containing political subtext against the occupying Roman military, noting the explicit use of the Latin loanword 'Legion' and the destruction of the swine.
Application — Judaism does not apply, preach, or pray this text. It functions solely as an object of historical inquiry regarding second-temple Judaism and the historical development of early Christianity.
Authorities named: Amy-Jill Levine — The Jewish Annotated New Testament · Geza Vermes — Jesus the Jew
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ The chapter is not canonical in Judaism and is approached solely as a historical
- ✓ The narratives involving tombs, a hemorrhaging woman, and a corpse are deeply em
- ✓ The use of the name 'Legion' for the demons cast into a herd of swine is underst
- ✓ The preserved Aramaic phrase 'Talitha cumi' parallels the healing practices of G
Comparative appendix — outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster (Latter-day Saint, Jehovah's Witnesses)
Latter-day Saint
Lens given to the model: Latter-day Saint reading (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints): the Bible read alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, with living prophets and continuing revelation, and the Joseph Smith Translation where relevant. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Immediate meaning — In Mark 5, Jesus demonstrates sovereign authority over three profound human afflictions: demonic possession (the Gerasene demoniac), chronic and incurable disease (the woman with the issue of blood), and physical death (Jairus's daughter). The narrative weaves these miracles together to highlight the necessity of faith, the dramatic public expulsion of unclean spirits into a herd of swine, and the intimate, private raising of a deceased child.
Reception — The Latter-day Saint reception of Mark 5 is deeply informed by Restoration theology concerning the nature of spirits and bodies, as well as the mechanics of priesthood power. The account of the demons begging to enter the swine (vv. 11-13) intersects directly with LDS teachings regarding the pre-mortal existence. Joseph Smith taught that Satan and his followers were denied physical bodies due to their rebellion before the world was created. Because obtaining a physical body is a central purpose of the Plan of Salvation, these unembodied evil spirits exist in a state of punishment and desperately seek embodiment—preferring even the body of a swine to having no body at all. Regarding the woman with the issue of blood, LDS reading focuses heavily on the KJV translation that 'virtue' (power) had gone out of Jesus (v. 30). Theologians like James E. Talmage have emphasized that this healing was not a passive or automatic event, but a dynamic transfer of divine energy. The woman's active, striving faith served as the conduit that literally drew this sustaining power from the Savior. Additionally, Jairus's specific request for Jesus to 'come and lay thy hands on her' (v. 23) is understood as a primary scriptural model for the priesthood ordinance of administering to the sick, establishing a pattern of physical touch coupled with priesthood authority.
Application — Latter-day Saints apply this chapter both as a model for seeking healing and as a source of comfort in extreme distress. The woman pressing through the crowd is frequently cited as an example of the spiritual effort required to draw Christ's power into one's life, teaching that believers must actively reach out to Him despite obstacles or long-standing suffering. Furthermore, Jesus's counsel to Jairus, 'Be not afraid, only believe' (v. 36), is continually invoked by modern Church leaders as a watchcry for the Saints. It is used pastorally to encourage hope and trust in God's timing, especially when facing seemingly insurmountable trials, the loss of loved ones, or periods of intense fear.
Authorities named: Joseph Smith — History of the Church · James E. Talmage — Jesus the Christ · Dieter F. Uchtdorf — General Conference Addresses
Jehovah's Witnesses
Lens given to the model: Jehovah's Witness reading (Watch Tower Society): attention to the divine name, God's Kingdom as a real government, conditional immortality, and a non-Trinitarian Christology. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Immediate meaning — In this narrative, Jesus demonstrates profound authority over three major afflictions: demonic influence, chronic illness, and death. Upon arriving in the region of the Gerasenes, he encounters a fiercely violent man possessed by a 'Legion' of demons. The demons recognize Jesus' identity, and he permits them to enter a herd of swine, which subsequently rushes to its destruction. Returning across the sea, Jesus is approached by Jairus, a synagogue ruler, whose daughter is dying. En route to Jairus's house, a woman suffering from a twelve-year hemorrhage touches Jesus' garment and is instantly healed by power that goes out from him. Arriving at the ruler's house, Jesus dismisses the mourners by declaring the dead child is merely 'asleep,' and proceeds to restore her to life.
Reception — Jehovah's Witnesses read Mark 5 as a powerful demonstration of Jesus' role as God's appointed King and a confirmation of key non-Trinitarian and mortalist doctrines. In verse 7, the demons address Jesus as the 'Son of the Most High God.' Watch Tower publications highlight this to argue that even wicked spirits recognize a clear distinction between Jesus and the Almighty God, Jehovah; Jesus is God's Son, not part of a Trinity. Furthermore, when Jesus perceives that 'power' has gone out of him to heal the bleeding woman (v. 30), this power is understood as Jehovah's holy spirit, or active force, which God channeled through Jesus, rather than Jesus utilizing intrinsic omnipotence as Almighty God. Most prominently, this chapter serves as a primary locus for the doctrine of conditional immortality. When Jesus states that Jairus's daughter is 'not dead, but is asleep' (v. 39), the tradition takes this as a literal description of the state of the dead. According to 'Insight on the Scriptures' and other doctrinal texts, death is a state of complete unconsciousness, comparable to a deep sleep from which one can be awakened only through a resurrection. The demons' destructive action upon the swine (v. 13) is also emphasized as evidence of the vicious, debased nature of fallen angels.
Application — The tradition applies Mark 5 to provide comfort regarding the state of the dead and hope for the future. The resurrection of Jairus's daughter is frequently used in Watch Tower literature and memorial services to assure mourners that their loved ones are merely 'sleeping' in death, awaiting an awakening. This miracle is presented as a small-scale foregleam of the global resurrection that will occur on earth under God's Kingdom. Additionally, the account of the demoniac serves as a stark warning against spiritism, illustrating the danger of demonic influence and reinforcing the necessity of relying on Jehovah for protection. Finally, Jesus' instruction to the healed demoniac to 'go home to your relatives, and report to them all the things Jehovah has done for you' (v. 19, per the New World Translation's rendering of 'Lord' to 'Jehovah' in this context) is used to encourage evangelism, demonstrating that experiencing God's mercy should naturally lead to sharing it with others.
Authorities named: Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Jesus-The Way, the Truth, the Life · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — What Does the Bible Really Teach?
Step 4Establish the original-language basis
The rendering is built from the source text, not from the English majority.
Textual basis — Greek text provided, reflecting a critical edition (e.g., Nestle-Aland/Westcott-Hort tradition).
Divine names — Theos (God), Kyrios (Lord)
- v1: Textual variant regarding the location: Γερασηνῶν (Gerasenes) versus Γαδαρηνῶν (Gadarenes) or Γεργεσηνῶν (Gergesenes).
- v14: The phrase 'αὐτοὺς χοίρους' is an unusual manuscript reading or conflation; major witnesses read 'τοὺς χοίρους' or 'αὐτούς'.
- v1: (f) repetition of the preposition 'εἰς' (εἰς τὸ πέραν... εἰς τὴν χώραν).
- v2: (c) zero-article pattern in the prepositional phrase 'ἐν πνεύματι ἀκαθάρτῳ'.
- v3: (c) multiple negation pattern for emphasis 'οὐδὲ... οὐκέτι οὐδεὶς'.
- v4: (e) chiasm of nouns: fetters/chains (πέδαις καὶ ἁλύσεσιν) to chains/fetters (τὰς ἁλύσεις καὶ τὰς πέδας); (a) cognate connection to v3 (δῆσαι -> δεδέσθαι).
- v5: (f) refraining spatial repetition 'ἐν τοῖς μνήμασιν καὶ ἐν τοῖς ὄρεσιν'.
- v6: (c) definite article used with a proper name 'τὸν Ἰησοῦν'.
- v7: (g) divine-name distribution: Ἰησοῦ, τοῦ θεοῦ, τὸν θεόν; (c) article pattern 'τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ὑψίστου'.
- v8: (c) specific definite article pattern 'τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἀκάθαρτον' contrasting the anarthrous use in v2.
- v9: (d) number shift from singular 'ὄνομά μοι' (my name) to plural 'πολλοί ἐσμεν' (we are many).
- v10: (d) number shift from singular verb 'παρεκάλει' to neuter plural pronoun 'αὐτὰ'.
- v11: (c) definite article pattern with noun and adjective 'ἀγέλη χοίρων μεγάλη'.
- v12: (d) number shift to plural verb 'παρεκάλεσαν' matching plural subject 'πάντες οἱ δαίμονες'.
- v13: (d) number shift with neuter plural subject 'τὰ πνεύματα' taking a plural verb 'εἰσῆλθον' (constructio ad sensum).
- v14: (c) demonstrative/article pattern 'αὐτοὺς χοίρους'.
- v15: (b) assonance in the string of participle endings 'καθήμενον καὶ ἱματισμένον καὶ σωφρονοῦντα'.
- v16: (c) substantival use of the definite article 'οἱ ἰδόντες'.
- v17: (f) repetition of the verbal root 'παρακαλεῖν', connecting back to the pleas in v10 and v12.
- v18: (c) definite article with an aorist participle 'ὁ δαιμονισθεὶς', highlighting a completed state vs the present tense in earlier verses.
- v19: (g) divine-name distribution: Kyrios (ὁ κύριός).
- v20: (f) thematic repetition/contrast substituting the acting subject 'ὁ Ἰησοῦς' for 'κύριός' from v19.
- v21: (f) spatial inclusio/repetition marking a scene shift 'πάλιν εἰς τὸ πέραν... παρὰ τὴν θάλασσαν'.
- v22: (h) presence of the interjection/particle 'ἰδού' (Behold).
- v23: (f) repetition of the conjunction 'ἵνα... ἵνα'.
- v24: (d) number shift: singular collective noun 'ὄχλος' taking a plural verb 'συνέθλιβον'.
- v25: (c) indefinite pronoun usage 'γυνὴ τις'.
- v26: (b) alliteration and (a) cognate repetition 'πολλὰ παθοῦσα ὑπὸ πολλῶν'.
- v27: (f) repetition in a string of aorist feminine participles 'ἀκούσασα... ἐλθοῦσα'.
- v28: (a) cognate root repetition 'ἅψωμαι' echoing 'ἥψατο' from v27.
- v29: (b) metaphorical wordplay 'πηγὴ τοῦ αἵματος' (fountain of blood).
- v30: (a) cognate prefix repetition 'ἐξ αὐτοῦ δύναμιν ἐξελθοῦσαν'.
- v31: (d) number shift: singular collective noun 'ὄχλον' with singular participle 'συνθλίβοντά', a syntactic contrast to v24.
- v32: (c) article acting as a substantive 'τὴν... ποιήσασαν'.
- v33: (b) assonance in feminine participles 'φοβηθεῖσα καὶ τρέμουσα'.
- v34: (f) thematic repetition of 'σέσωκέν' (from v28) and 'μάστιγός' (from v29).
- v35: (c) definite article pattern identifying a title 'τὸν διδάσκαλον'.
- v36: (a) cognate / alliterative phrase 'λόγον λαλούμενον'.
- v37: (c) double negative construction 'οὐκ ἀφῆκεν οὐδένα'.
- v38: (b) assonance in present active plural participles 'κλαίοντας καὶ ἀλαλάζοντας'.
- v39: (f) thematic repetition of the verb 'κλαίετε' from v38.
- v40: (c) article structure defining parental pairs 'τὸν πατέρα... καὶ τὴν μητέρα'.
- v41: (f) bilingual wordplay/translation explicitly provided in text 'ταλιθα κουμ -> τὸ κοράσιον... ἔγειρε'.
- v42: (a) cognate / figura etymologica construction 'ἐξέστησαν... ἐκστάσει'.
- v43: (c) absolute negation pattern 'μηδεὶς' mapping to an articular infinitive equivalent.
Step 5Compare the translations, verse by verse
Each difference classified: textual · lexical · grammatical · interpretive · stylistic (the last only where it changes meaning).
- lexicalv1 lexical difference in translating the region beyond the sea — “other side” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “strait” (DRC)
- stylisticv1 (vv 1, 8, 31, 34) stylistic preposition choice — “into” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “to” (YLT, DARBY)
- textualv1 textual variant regarding the name of the region — “Gadarenes” (WEB, KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Gerasenes” (ASV) vs “Gerasens” (DRC)
- interpretivev2 interpretive choice between spatial or possessive relationship to the spirit — “with” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “possessed by” (DARBY)
- textualv5 textual variant altering the word order of mountains and tombs, and lexical translation of tombs — “tombs” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “mountains” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “monuments” (DRC)
- textualv5 textual variant altering the word order of mountains and tombs — “mountains he was” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “tombs” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “he was” (YLT) vs “mountains” (DRC)
- lexicalv6 lexical choice for indicating reverence or worship — “worshipped” (KJV, ASV) vs “bowed down to” (WEB) vs “bowed before” (YLT) vs “did” (DARBY) vs “worshiped” (WEBSTER) vs “adored” (DRC)
- grammaticalv7 grammatical choice of verb form for calling out — “crying out” (WEB, ASV) vs “cried” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “crying” (DARBY, DRC) vs “having called” (YLT)
- textualv7 textual or grammatical difference in the verb of speaking — “he” (WEB, YLT, DRC) vs “and said” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “he saith” (ASV) vs “he says” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv7 grammatical and stylistic phrasing of a common idiom — “do with thee” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you” (WEB) vs “me and to” (YLT)
- stylisticv7 stylistic choice of archaic vs modern pronoun — “thee” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you” (WEB)
- lexicalv8 lexical and syntactical translation of the command to exit — “Come” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER) vs “forth thou unclean spirit” (ASV) vs “forth spirit unclean” (YLT) vs “forth unclean spirit” (DARBY) vs “Go” (DRC)
- stylisticv9 stylistic choice of pronoun — “thy” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “your” (WEB)
- lexicalv9 lexical translation of conjunction — “is Legion for” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “because” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv10 (vv 10, 17) lexical choice for pleading — “besought” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “begged” (WEB) vs “was calling on” (YLT)
- textualv11 textual variant regarding the description of the mountainside — “Now” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “And” (YLT, DRC) vs “on the mountainside” (WEB)
- lexicalv11 (vv 11, 12, 13, 16) lexical choice for the herd animals — “swine” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “pigs” (WEB)
- lexicalv13 lexical and syntactical differences in describing the permission — “And forthwith Jesus gave” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “immediately” (YLT, DRC) vs “At once” (WEB) vs “he” (ASV) vs “immediately allowed” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv13 grammatical choice of verb construction for the spirits exiting — “came” (WEB, ASV) vs “went out and entered” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “going” (DARBY, DRC) vs “did enter” (YLT)
- lexicalv13 lexical choice for how the herd perished in the water — “choked” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “drowned” (WEB, ASV) vs “stifled” (DRC)
- grammaticalv15 grammatical choice of tense for arriving — “come to” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “came” (WEB, DRC) vs “unto” (YLT)
- grammaticalv16 grammatical difference in tense for seeing — “And they that saw” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “had seen” (DARBY, DRC) vs “Those who” (WEB) vs “those having seen” (YLT)
- lexicalv16 lexical choice for reporting the event — “told” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “declared to” (WEB, YLT) vs “declared unto” (ASV) vs “related to” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv17 grammatical phrasing of the request to leave — “from” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “to depart out of” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “go away from” (YLT) vs “that he would from” (DRC)
- lexicalv17 lexical translation of the region boundaries — “coasts” (KJV, DARBY, DRC) vs “borders” (ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “region” (WEB)
- grammaticalv19 stylistic and grammatical difference in the verb of speaking — “to” (YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “saith unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “said to” (WEB) vs “says to” (DARBY)
- lexicalv19 lexical choice regarding his household and people — “thy friends” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “your house to your” (WEB) vs “house unto thy” (ASV) vs “house unto thine own” (YLT) vs “thine own people” (DARBY)
- lexicalv19 lexical choice for the extent of what was done — “how” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “what” (WEB)
- grammaticalv19 grammatical phrasing of the action performed — “hath done for thee” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “has you” (WEB) vs “did to” (YLT) vs “has” (DARBY)
- lexicalv20 lexical choice for departing — “went his way” (WEB, ASV, DRC) vs “departed” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “went away” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv20 lexical translation for spreading the news — “publish” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “proclaim” (WEB, YLT, DARBY)
- grammaticalv20 grammatical phrasing of the great things done — “had done for” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “great things” (WEB) vs “did to” (YLT)
- lexicalv20 lexical choice for expressing the people's amazement — “wondered” (DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “everyone marveled” (WEB) vs “all men did marvel” (KJV) vs “marvelled” (ASV) vs “were wondering” (YLT)
- lexicalv21 lexical translation of proximity to the sea — “by” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “nigh unto” (KJV, DRC) vs “near” (YLT) vs “to” (WEBSTER)
- stylisticv22 stylistic phrasing of the man's name — “Jairus by name” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “Jairus” (YLT, DARBY) vs “came” (WEB) vs “Jaïrus” (ASV) vs “named” (DRC)
- grammaticalv22 grammatical structure for the act of seeing — “seeing” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “when he saw” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “having seen” (YLT)
- grammaticalv22 grammatical choice of verb tense for falling down — “he fell” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER) vs “falleth” (ASV) vs “doth fall” (YLT) vs “falls down” (DARBY) vs “falleth down” (DRC)
- grammaticalv23 grammatical choice of verb tense for begging — “besought” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “he” (DARBY, DRC) vs “begged” (WEB) vs “beseecheth” (ASV) vs “he was calling upon” (YLT)
- lexicalv23 lexical choice for the intensity of begging — “much” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “greatly” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- interpretivev23 interpretive translation of being at the point of death — “is” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “lieth” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- lexicalv23 (vv 23, 28) lexical choice for being healed or saved — “healed” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “made healthy” (WEB) vs “made whole” (ASV) vs “saved” (YLT) vs “safe” (DRC)
- textualv24 textual and stylistic difference in specifying the subject — “He” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “And Jesus” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- lexicalv24 lexical choice for the size of the crowd — “a great multitude” (WEB, ASV, DRC) vs “much people followed” (KJV) vs “there was following” (YLT) vs “a large crowd” (DARBY) vs “many” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv24 lexical choice for the crowd pressing in — “thronged” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “they” (ASV, DRC) vs “they pressed upon” (WEB) vs “they were thronging” (YLT) vs “pressed on” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv25 grammatical phrasing describing the woman's condition — “who” (ASV, WEBSTER) vs “who a discharge” (WEB) vs “which had an issue” (KJV) vs “having” (YLT) vs “who had a flux” (DARBY) vs “who was under” (DRC)
- lexicalv26 lexical choice for everything she possessed — “all that” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “everything” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv27 grammatical structure for having heard — “having” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “When she had” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
- lexicalv27 lexical translation of the preposition concerning — “of” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the things concerning” (WEB, ASV) vs “about” (YLT) vs “concerning” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv27 grammatical and lexical phrasing of her approach — “came” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “up behind him” (WEB) vs “having come” (YLT)
- lexicalv27 lexical choice for the crowd — “crowd” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “press behind and” (KJV) vs “multitude she” (YLT) vs “crowd him” (DRC)
- lexicalv27 (vv 27, 30) lexical choice for clothing — “garment” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “clothes” (WEB, DARBY)
- stylisticv28 stylistic verb choice — “shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “will” (WEB)
- lexicalv29 lexical translation for the immediate stopping of blood — “And straightway the fountain” (KJV, ASV) vs “Immediately flow” (WEB) vs “immediately was” (YLT) vs “immediately her” (DARBY) vs “immediately” (WEBSTER) vs “forthwith” (DRC)
- lexicalv29 lexical choice for perceiving the healing — “felt” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “knew” (YLT, DARBY)
- grammaticalv30 grammatical choice in describing awareness — “And Jesus immediately knowing” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “Jesus” (DARBY, DRC) vs “Jesus perceiving” (WEB) vs “straightway perceiving” (ASV) vs “Jesus having known” (YLT)
- lexicalv30 lexical choice for the multitude — “crowd” (ASV, DARBY) vs “multitude” (YLT, DRC) vs “crowd asked” (WEB) vs “press and said” (KJV) vs “throng” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv30 grammatical choice of verb aspect — “touched” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “did touch” (YLT) vs “has” (DARBY) vs “hath” (DRC)
- stylisticv31 (vv 31, 34) stylistic pronoun choice — “Thou seest” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “You see” (WEB)
- lexicalv31 lexical phrasing of the crowd pressing — “multitude thronging thee” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “pressing against you” (WEB) vs “crowd pressing on” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv31 grammatical verb aspect — “touched” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “did touch” (YLT) vs “hath” (DRC)
- grammaticalv32 grammatical phrasing of the one who did it — “who” (WEB, DARBY, DRC) vs “that had done” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “who did” (YLT)
- grammaticalv33 grammatical choice for experiencing fear — “fearing” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “having been afraid” (YLT) vs “frightened” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv33 grammatical translation of what occurred to her — “was done in” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “had been to” (WEB, ASV) vs “on” (YLT) vs “had taken place” (DARBY)
- lexicalv34 lexical phrasing of being healed — “hath made thee whole” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “has you well” (WEB) vs “saved” (YLT) vs “has healed” (DARBY)
- lexicalv34 lexical translation of the affliction and healing — “whole of thy plague” (KJV, ASV) vs “cured your disease” (WEB) vs “from” (YLT) vs “well scourge” (DARBY) vs “healed infirmity” (WEBSTER) vs “thou disease” (DRC)
- grammaticalv35 grammatical phrasing of the ongoing speaking and arrival — “was still speaking people” (WEB) vs “yet spake there came” (KJV) vs “they come” (ASV) vs “is speaking come” (YLT) vs “was speaking they come” (DARBY) vs “was speaking” (WEBSTER) vs “was speaking some come” (DRC)
- lexicalv35 lexical phrasing of the synagogue official's title — “ruler of the synagogue’s” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “synagogue ruler’s” (WEB) vs “chief” (YLT)
- grammaticalv35 grammatical phrasing of the speakers — “saying” (ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “saying Your” (WEB) vs “certain which said Thy” (KJV) vs “who” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv35 grammatical choice of tense for death — “is dead” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “did die” (YLT) vs “has died” (DARBY)
- lexicalv35 lexical choice for troubling the teacher — “troublest thou” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “bother” (WEB) vs “still dost harass” (YLT) vs “dost trouble” (DRC)
- lexicalv35 lexical choice for the teacher's title — “Master any further” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Teacher” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “Teacher more” (WEB)
- textualv36 textual variant involving the presence of 'immediately' — “But” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “As soon as” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “And” (YLT)
- textualv36 textual variant between 'overhearing' and 'hearing' — “heard” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “immediately having” (YLT, DARBY) vs “when he” (WEB) vs “not heeding” (ASV) vs “having” (DRC)
- stylisticv36 stylistic phrasing of the negative command — “Be not afraid” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “Fear” (ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “Don’t” (WEB)
- lexicalv37 lexical choice for accompanying — “follow” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “with” (ASV, YLT) vs “accompany” (DARBY)
- lexicalv37 lexical choice for the exception — “save” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “except” (WEB, YLT) vs “but” (DRC)
- textualv38 textual variant in verb number (singular vs plural) — “And he cometh” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “they come” (ASV, DRC) vs “came” (WEB) vs “comes” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv38 grammatical phrasing of the mourning — “wailing” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “wailed greatly” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “great wailing” (WEB) vs “wailing much” (DRC)
- stylisticv39 stylistic verb of speaking — “to” (YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “saith unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “said to” (WEB) vs “says to” (DARBY)
- lexicalv39 lexical choice for the commotion — “do make a tumult” (YLT, DARBY) vs “do you an uproar” (WEB) vs “make ye this ado” (KJV) vs “a tumult” (ASV) vs “tumult” (WEBSTER) vs “you” (DRC)
- lexicalv39 (vv 39, 41) lexical choice for the young girl — “damsel is” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “child” (WEB, ASV) vs “child did” (YLT) vs “child has” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv39 grammatical tense for death — “dead” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “die” (YLT) vs “died” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv39 grammatical phrasing of sleeping — “sleepeth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “is asleep” (WEB) vs “doth sleep” (YLT) vs “sleeps” (DARBY)
- lexicalv40 lexical choice for mocking laughter — “laughed” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “derided” (DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “ridiculed” (WEB) vs “were laughing at” (YLT)
- grammaticalv40 grammatical choice of participle vs finite verb — “having” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “had” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- stylisticv40 stylistic phrasing for the companions — “them that were” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “those” (YLT, DARBY) vs “those who” (WEB) vs “her mother and” (ASV)
- grammaticalv40 grammatical and lexical choice for entering — “entereth” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “goeth” (ASV, YLT) vs “went” (WEB) vs “enters” (DARBY)
- textualv40 textual and lexical variant for the girl's location or state — “child” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “damsel was lying” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “child is” (YLT)
- lexicalv41 lexical translation of the command to rise — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “say unto thee arise” (KJV, ASV) vs “tell you get up” (WEB)
- lexicalv42 lexical translation of immediately — “Immediately” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “And straightway” (KJV, ASV) vs “forthwith” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv42 lexical and stylistic choice for rising — “damsel arose” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “rose up” (ASV, DRC) vs “girl rose up” (WEB)
- grammaticalv42 grammatical phrasing of her walking — “walked for” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “was walking” (YLT) vs “and” (DRC)
- grammaticalv42 grammatical phrasing of her age — “old” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “And” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- lexicalv42 lexical choice for their reaction — “astonished” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “amazed” (WEB, YLT) vs “amazed straightway” (ASV)
- lexicalv42 lexical choice for the state of amazement — “astonishment” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “amazement” (WEB, ASV, YLT)
- lexicalv43 lexical choice for giving a command — “charged” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “strictly ordered” (WEB)
- lexicalv43 lexical and stylistic choice for indicating 'no one' — “man should” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “one” (WEB, DARBY) vs “one may” (YLT)
- grammaticalv43 grammatical phrasing of the object — “this” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “it” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “this thing” (YLT)
- lexicalv43 lexical choice for ordering food to be given — “commanded” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “he” (ASV) vs “he said” (YLT) vs “he desired” (DARBY)
Step 6Synthesize — atomic claims, by family, not seat count
Every statement is split into the smallest testable claims; each eligible profile is AFFIRM / DENY / QUALIFY / UNSPECIFIED (silence is never assent); a claim rises to consensus by families. Only affirm-vs-deny is contradiction — a qualification is diversity.
The consensus
Universally across all traditions, Jesus demonstrated absolute authority over supernatural forces, chronic physical illness, and death through three distinct miracles. Many traditions affirm that the narrative of the Gerasene demoniac establishes the literal reality of demonic oppression, and it is broadly maintained that Jesus commissioning the healed man to return home serves as a biblical paradigm for lay evangelism within one's own community. Several traditions also emphasize the pastoral imperative to maintain faith despite severe crises, as seen in Jesus' command to Jairus, and contrast the bleeding woman's intentional touch with the pressing crowd to distinguish active, saving faith from superficial religious proximity. However, the theological nature of the woman's healing is disputed; traditions divide over whether the transmission of power through Jesus' garment establishes that physical matter can mediate divine grace, validating sacramental theology and relics, or whether it demonstrates that salvation is secured through unmediated, personal faith rather than any inherent power in physical garments or rituals.
Pan-Christian — SUPPORT in every eligible family
Jesus demonstrated absolute authority over supernatural forces, chronic physical illness, and death through three distinct miracles.
12 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 0 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation SUPPORTFree-church SUPPORTwho said what (12)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Mark 5 presents three interconnected miracles demonstrating Jesus' sovereign power over demons, chronic disease, and death itself.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“In its immediate narrative context, Mark 5 presents three profound demonstrations of Jesus' authority over forces that diminish or destroy human life: the demonic realm, chronic impurity/disease, and death itself.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Mark 5 comprises three interlocking miracle narratives that demonstrate Jesus' absolute authority over demonic subjugation, chronic illness, and death.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“In this chapter, Jesus demonstrates supreme authority over three destructive forces that isolate human beings from their communities: demonic possession in a Gentile territory, chronic ritual impurity, and death.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Mark 5 recounts three miracles demonstrating Jesus' absolute authority over the forces that destroy human life: the demonic, chronic disease, and death.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Mark 5 narrates three powerful demonstrations of Jesus's authority over forces that diminish and destroy human life.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“The chapter is a narrative recording three interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus's absolute authority over the most terrifying human afflictions: demonic subjugation, incurable chronic illness, and death itself.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“In its immediate narrative context, Mark 5 presents a triptych of Jesus' sovereign authority over forces that overwhelm human capacity: the chaotic evil of the demonic Legion in Gentile territory, a chronic flow of blood causing permanent ritual impurity, and the ultimate boundary of death in Jairus's daughter.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“In Mark 5, the narrative follows Jesus demonstrating authority over three formidable forces: demons, chronic illness, and death.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalism receives Mark 5 as a definitive revelation of Christ's total victory over demonic oppression, chronic disease, and death.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The narrative recounts three distinct but interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus' supreme authority over forces that diminish or destroy human life: spiritual bondage, chronic illness, and death.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“In Mark 5, Jesus demonstrates absolute authority over the spiritual realm, physical disease, and death through three distinct miracles.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The narrative of the Gerasene demoniac establishes the literal reality of demonic oppression and Jesus' absolute authority to cast out unclean spirits.
9 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 3 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation SUPPORTFree-church SUPPORTwho said what (9)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The exorcism of the Gerasene demoniac informs the Church's understanding of spiritual warfare and the Rite of Exorcism, emphasizing Christ's absolute authority over demonic forces.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Jesus crosses into Gentile territory and exorcises a 'Legion' of demons from a man living among the tombs, permitting the spirits to enter a herd of pigs which then perish in the sea.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Mark 5 comprises three interlocking miracle narratives that demonstrate Jesus' absolute authority over demonic subjugation, chronic illness, and death.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Mark 5 recounts three miracles demonstrating Jesus' absolute authority over the forces that destroy human life: the demonic, chronic disease, and death.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“He exercises absolute command over the spirits, granting their request to enter a herd of pigs, which then rush into the sea.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“The chapter is a narrative recording three interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus's absolute authority over the most terrifying human afflictions: demonic subjugation, incurable chronic illness, and death itself.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Against theological liberalism, the tradition reads the Gerasene demoniac narrative as establishing the literal, destructive reality of demonic forces and Jesus' supreme, uncontested authority to subjugate them (verses 1-13).” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The narrative recounts three distinct but interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus' supreme authority over forces that diminish or destroy human life: spiritual bondage, chronic illness, and death. He frees a Gadarene man possessed by a legion of demons, sending them into a herd of swine;” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“In Mark 5, Jesus demonstrates absolute authority over the spiritual realm, physical disease, and death through three distinct miracles.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Broad — SUPPORT in all but one family, that one undetermined
Jesus commissioning the healed demoniac to return home serves as a biblical paradigm for lay evangelism and witnessing within one's own community.
7 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 5 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation SUPPORTFree-church SUPPORTwho said what (7)
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Additionally, Jesus' command to the healed demoniac to 'go home to thy friends' is frequently utilized to encourage lay evangelism, validating the testimony of ordinary believers in their everyday domestic spheres.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Finally, the healed demoniac's commission (v. 19) is applied as a paradigm for ordinary Christian witness, calling believers to testify to their communities about the sovereign mercy the Lord has shown them.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“The healed demoniac's commission to go home and tell his friends serves as a universal mandate for all converted individuals to engage in personal testimony and lay evangelism.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Views Christ's command to the delivered man to return home as establishing a model for domestic and local evangelism, demonstrating that true religion immediately makes a person a blessing to their own household.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“Additionally, Jesus' instruction to the healed man to remain and tell his community what the Lord has done (v. 19) serves as a foundational model for Anabaptist evangelism: witnessing to God's restorative mercy through transformed, nonviolent living within local communities.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The formerly possessed man, who is instructed to 'Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee' (Mark 5:19), is held up as a model for lay evangelism; believers are taught that personal testimony of Christ's restorative power is often the most effective witness.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“The healed demoniac's return to his friends to report the Lord's mercy is heavily utilized as a straightforward pattern for personal evangelism.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
Family-specific — characteristic of one family
The demons' request to enter the pigs demonstrates that demonic forces are completely subject to the sovereign permission of Christ and cannot act without it.
2 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“They cannot so much as touch animals without Christ's permissive will, emphasizing God's absolute sovereignty and the ultimate powerlessness of the demonic.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Calvin argues that the demons' plea to enter the swine (vv. 12-13) decisively proves that Satan and his agents are completely bridled by God's sovereign decree; they can do absolutely nothing without Christ's explicit permission.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
The degradation of the demoniac and his subsequent restoration illustrates a cosmic conflict between Satan's intent to destroy and Christ's power to restore.
2 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (3)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Redemptive-historically, commentators like William Hendriksen read these three miracles not merely as isolated acts of compassion, but as eschatological signs: Christ the Covenant King is actively inaugurating His kingdom by comprehensively subduing demonic tyranny, incurable disease, and death itself.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The degradation of the demoniac and his subsequent restoration illustrate the great-controversy theme, contrasting Satan's intent to destroy with Christ's power to restore;” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
“In Churches of Christ, Mark 5 is frequently preached to illustrate the destructive nature of sin (mirrored by the demoniac's self-harm and isolation) and the total restorative power of Jesus.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
The demoniac's restoration to a 'right mind' represents the holistic peace and spiritual sanity brought by radical personal conversion and justifying grace.
2 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Baptist · AFFIRM
“The man's transition from uncontrollable depravity to sitting 'clothed, and in his right mind' is heralded as the hallmark of the new birth.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“John Wesley and early Methodist commentators like Adam Clarke read the Gerasene demoniac's restoration to his 'right mind' (v. 15) as a profound metaphor for the spiritual sanity that accompanies justifying grace, contrasting it with the inherent madness and self-destruction of a life governed by sin.”
- Baptist · AFFIRM
The narrative of the demoniac serves as an ascetic type for the healing of the passion-bound soul and its restoration to spiritual stillness.
2 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Ascetically, the demoniac dwelling in the tombs represents the human nous (the eye of the soul) darkened by passions and spiritual death; his restoration to his 'right mind' sitting at the feet of Jesus is the goal of Orthodox psychotherapy and hesychastic prayer.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“His restoration to being 'clothed and in his right mind' represents the ascetic goal of inner unification and hesychia (stillness) achieved solely through the authoritative command of Christ.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
Jesus' command to Jairus to 'only believe' establishes a pastoral imperative to maintain faith in Christ's word despite severe crises and contradictory natural evidence.
5 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 7 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church SUPPORTwho said what (5)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“When confronted with physical death or despair, Christians are taught to model Jairus and the bleeding woman by clinging strictly to the external Word of Christ ('only believe') rather than their own feelings or dire circumstances.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Pastors also use Jesus's words to Jairus, 'only believe,' to comfort believers facing seemingly impossible grief or terminal circumstances.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Additionally, Jesus' word to Jairus, 'Fear not, only believe' (v. 36), is frequently invoked in Wesleyan pastoral care as an exhortation to maintain faith when sensory evidence and circumstances dictate despair.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The mandate to 'only believe' (verse 36) functions as a ubiquitous pastoral encouragement to maintain faith during severe crises or negative medical reports.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Additionally, Jesus' command to Jairus, 'only believe' (verse 36), is applied to encourage believers facing insurmountable grief or fear, with the understanding that such belief inherently involves continued obedience and trust in Christ's word.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
Tradition-specific — one tradition only
The miracles provide factual, historical evidence intended to serve as apologetic proof of Jesus' divine sonship.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Commentators in this tradition read these miracles as literal, historical facts recorded specifically to produce rational faith in Jesus as the Son of God.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
The three miracles function redemptive-historically to display Christ's systematic reversal of the curse of the Fall.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Reformed theology reads Mark 5 through the distinct lenses of God's absolute sovereignty and the redemptive-historical mission of the Mediator to reverse the curse of the Fall.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
The failure of chains and fetters to tame the demoniac contrasts with Jesus' ability to restore him to peace through nonviolent, verbal authority.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The restored demoniac—found 'sitting, clothed, and in his right mind' (v. 15)—is viewed as the archetypal picture of the peaceable kingdom, contrasting sharply with the world's failed attempts to control violence with chains and fetters (v. 4).”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
The destruction of the swine and the fear of the locals reveals a human tendency to value economic stability and the status quo over human liberation.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The townspeople's rejection of Jesus illustrates a societal preference for the economic status quo and managed violence over the disruptive liberation brought by the Kingdom of God.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
The inability of human effort to cure the bleeding woman or bind the demoniac illustrates the total helplessness of humanity under the Law.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“The helplessness of the demoniac, the bleeding woman, and the dead girl typifies the human condition under the Law: completely bound by Satan, incurable by human effort, and spiritually dead.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
The power that left Jesus to heal the woman is identified as God's uncreated divine energy radiating through Christ's human nature.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The 'power' (dynamis) that Jesus perceives going out from Him (v. 30) is interpreted by theologians like Gregory Palamas as the uncreated divine energy, which is communicated to creation through the deified physical flesh of the incarnate Christ.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
The transmission of power through Jesus' garment demonstrates that His human nature possesses divine majesty, supporting the communication of attributes.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“The healing of the woman with the flow of blood demonstrates that Christ's human nature exercises divine, life-giving power, supporting the communication of attributes and sacramental realism.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
The raising of Jairus's daughter by the hand demonstrates that Christ's human flesh is inherently life-giving due to its union with the Word.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Theologians like Severus of Antioch point to these physical acts of healing as proof of the 'life-giving flesh' (zoopoios sarx).”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
Jesus' healings of the bleeding woman and Jairus's daughter demonstrate a kingdom ethic that prioritizes human restoration over rigid adherence to ritual purity laws.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“In the subsequent healings, Anabaptist readers highlight Jesus' willingness to cross strict religious purity boundaries (touching a bleeding woman and a corpse) to prioritize human restoration over legalism.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
The two healed females represent the Gentile Church and the Jewish Synagogue in patristic ecclesiological typology.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Latin reception, synthesized by Thomas Aquinas, frequently traces ecclesiological typology in the intercalated miracles: the twelve-year-old girl represents the Synagogue, while the bleeding woman represents the Gentile Church which approaches Christ from behind to be healed.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The sequence of raising the dead girl and commanding she be given food typologically represents the sequence of the Sacraments of Penance and the Eucharist.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Finally, the raising of Jairus's daughter is applied to the Sacrament of Penance, where the spiritually dead are restored to life by Christ's word, and then immediately directed to receive the Eucharist to sustain their renewed state of grace.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Jesus' description of the dead girl as sleeping constitutes definitive proof of conditional immortality, showing that the dead are unconscious.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Adventists argue this verse proves that death is an unconscious state of rest, rather than the separation of an immortal soul from the body.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
Mentioned across families — affirmed somewhere in each family, no majority — not consensus
The woman's intentional touch is contrasted with the pressing crowd to distinguish active, saving faith from superficial religious proximity.
4 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 8 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (4)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The crowd presses against His humanity without spiritual comprehension, but the woman's faith directly encounters the life-giving divine power united to His flesh.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“The Evangelical tradition, typified by J. C. Ryle, places heavy emphasis on the contrast between the multitude that merely 'thronged' Jesus and the woman who touched him with saving faith, using this to distinguish outward religious observance from inward, active trust.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Rather than viewing the woman's touch of Christ's garment as evidence of sacramental or mediated grace, Baptist expositors sharply distinguish between the crowd that merely pressed against Jesus physically and the woman who touched Him with personal, active faith.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The woman with the issue of blood serves as a homiletic illustration of the difference between casual association with the church (the pressing crowd) and active, saving faith (the intentional touch).”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
Jesus' declaration that the girl is merely sleeping establishes that, for the believer, death is transformed into a temporary slumber preceding the resurrection.
3 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (3)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The raising of Jairus's daughter (vv. 35-43) establishes the Orthodox eschatological view of death as a mere 'sleep' (koimesis) from which Christ will awaken humanity, prefiguring the general resurrection.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“The declaration that the girl 'is not dead, but sleepeth' (v. 39) is frequently used in Lutheran funeral preaching to comfort mourners that, in Christ, death has been reduced to a temporary slumber from which the believer will be easily awakened.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Finally, the doctrine of soul sleep drawn from verse 39 is applied pastorally to comfort grieving families, assuring them that their dead loved ones are resting peacefully and unconsciously until the resurrection morning.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
Disputed — a family is mixed, or families affirm vs deny
The demonic name 'Legion' carries imperial overtones, framing the exorcism as a demonstration of Jesus' nonviolent victory over socio-political and systemic oppression.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“'Legion' is recognized as a term of imperial military occupation, framing the exorcism as a liberation from systemic oppression, while all three miracles are celebrated for restoring marginalized individuals to their families, communities, and social agency.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The term 'Legion' invokes the socio-political reality of Roman military occupation, and the exorcism functions as a demonstration of Jesus' nonviolent victory over imperial powers.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
The woman's physical act of touching Jesus' garment demonstrates that biblical faith is inherently active and obedient, requiring physical action.
1 affirm · 2 deny · 0 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation OPPOSEFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (3)
- Lutheran · DENY
“Jesus' instruction to Jairus and the woman exemplifies justifying faith as a passive reception that clings to Christ's naked Word despite the contradictory evidence of the senses or reason.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“Calvin notes that her belief that physical contact with Christ's garment was necessary (v. 28) was mixed with a degree of superstition or theological error.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“C.E.W. Dorris notes that the woman with the issue of blood possessed a faith that drove her to physical action (touching the garment); her faith was not merely intellectual ascent but was 'active' and 'obedient,' a recurring thematic requirement for salvation in Restorationist theology.”
- Lutheran · DENY
The woman's belief that she needed to touch Jesus's garment contained theological error, yet Christ graciously accommodated and honored the genuine faith beneath it.
1 affirm · 1 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient LEANING-CONTESTEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“Furthermore, because this divine energy healed the woman through the medium of His physical clothes, John of Damascus and later Byzantine defenders of icons cite this passage as definitive proof that matter is not inherently evil and can become a vehicle for divine grace, establishing the biblical foundation for the veneration of relics and holy objects.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“However, because her faith was fundamentally directed toward the true Redeemer, Christ graciously accommodated her weakness, honoring her faith and correcting her understanding by attributing the healing to her trust in Him (v. 34).”
- Eastern Orthodox · DENY
The woman's healing demonstrates that salvation is secured through unmediated, personal faith rather than through any inherent power in physical garments or rituals.
2 affirm · 4 deny · 1 qualify · 5 silentAncient OPPOSEReformation MIXEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (7)
- Catholic · DENY
“The healing of the bleeding woman encourages devotion to the sacraments, sacramentals, and relics, teaching that faith expressed through physical proximity to sacred things mediates Christ's healing.” - Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“Furthermore, because this divine energy healed the woman through the medium of His physical clothes, John of Damascus and later Byzantine defenders of icons cite this passage as definitive proof that matter is not inherently evil and can become a vehicle for divine grace, establishing the biblical foundation for the veneration of relics and holy objects.” - Oriental Orthodox · DENY
“Liturgically and sacramentally, the physical mediations of healing in this chapter—the touch of a garment and the grasping of a hand—undergird the Oriental Orthodox reliance on material elements (water, oil, the Eucharistic elements) to transmit divine grace.” - Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“The Anglo-Catholic tradition views the transmission of 'virtue' or power through Jesus' garments as profoundly incarnational, pointing to it as a scriptural defense for sacramental theology—the belief that God uses material elements to mediate spiritual grace.” - Lutheran · DENY
“Just as divine power was mediated physically through His body and garment, Lutheran dogmatics assert that Christ's body and blood truly mediate forgiveness and life in the Eucharist.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“However, because her faith was fundamentally directed toward the true Redeemer, Christ graciously accommodated her weakness, honoring her faith and correcting her understanding by attributing the healing to her trust in Him (v. 34).” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“The woman's healing demonstrates that active, personal faith is the instrument of salvation, distinguishing it from any inherent power in the physical garment or mere physical proximity to Christ.”
- Catholic · DENY
The transmission of healing power through Jesus' garment establishes that physical matter can mediate divine grace, validating sacramental theology and the veneration of relics.
2 affirm · 2 deny · 3 qualify · 5 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDwho said what (7)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The healing of the bleeding woman encourages devotion to the sacraments, sacramentals, and relics, teaching that faith expressed through physical proximity to sacred things mediates Christ's healing.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, because this divine energy healed the woman through the medium of His physical clothes, John of Damascus and later Byzantine defenders of icons cite this passage as definitive proof that matter is not inherently evil and can become a vehicle for divine grace, establishing the biblical foundation for the veneration of relics and holy objects.” - Oriental Orthodox · QUALIFY
“Liturgically and sacramentally, the physical mediations of healing in this chapter—the touch of a garment and the grasping of a hand—undergird the Oriental Orthodox reliance on material elements (water, oil, the Eucharistic elements) to transmit divine grace.” - Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“The Anglo-Catholic tradition views the transmission of 'virtue' or power through Jesus' garments as profoundly incarnational, pointing to it as a scriptural defense for sacramental theology—the belief that God uses material elements to mediate spiritual grace.” - Lutheran · QUALIFY
“The healing of the woman with the flow of blood demonstrates that Christ's human nature exercises divine, life-giving power, supporting the communication of attributes and sacramental realism.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“Calvin notes that her belief that physical contact with Christ's garment was necessary (v. 28) was mixed with a degree of superstition or theological error.” - Baptist · DENY
“Rather than viewing the woman's touch of Christ's garment as evidence of sacramental or mediated grace, Baptist expositors sharply distinguish between the crowd that merely pressed against Jesus physically and the woman who touched Him with personal, active faith.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Christ's physical mediations of healing provide a biblical foundation for specific sacramental rites of the sick, such as unction and the laying on of hands.
3 affirm · 1 deny · 0 qualify · 8 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDwho said what (4)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The woman's touch of Christ's garment is applied directly to the Mysteries (Sacraments), particularly the Eucharist and Holy Unction, where believers physically touch and consume the life-giving body and blood of Christ for the healing of soul and body.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The healing of the woman is frequently invoked in the Coptic and Syriac rites for the Unction of the Sick, presenting Christ as the supreme Physician who heals without medicine.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“The physical mediation of Christ's healing power informs the rites of the Ministration to the Sick in the Book of Common Prayer, particularly the laying on of hands and unction.” - Baptist · DENY
“Rather than viewing the woman's touch of Christ's garment as evidence of sacramental or mediated grace, Baptist expositors sharply distinguish between the crowd that merely pressed against Jesus physically and the woman who touched Him with personal, active faith.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
The healing of the woman demonstrates that active, expectant faith operates as a catalyst to draw tangible healing power from Christ.
4 affirm · 1 deny · 0 qualify · 7 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation MIXEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (5)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The woman's faith drew out healing power, contrasting her intentional spiritual touch with the uncomprehending physical pressing of the crowd.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Faith is presented as the vital catalyst for these life-giving encounters.” - Lutheran · DENY
“Jesus' instruction to Jairus and the woman exemplifies justifying faith as a passive reception that clings to Christ's naked Word despite the contradictory evidence of the senses or reason.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Interprets the woman's physical healing as a direct parallel to spiritual salvation, noting that faith is the necessary instrument that draws upon Christ's divine power (virtue).” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Figures such as Smith Wigglesworth (Ever Increasing Faith) utilized this pericope to argue that faith acts as a necessary catalyst, actively reaching out to draw physical healing from Christ (verse 34).”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
Jesus' statements 'your faith has made you well' and 'only believe' prove that justifying faith operates as a passive reception of Christ's promise rather than a meritorious work.
1 affirm · 1 deny · 1 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDwho said what (3)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Faith is not a meritorious work, but a receptive organ that clings solely to Christ's promise, even when the evidence of the senses and human reason (the doctors' failure, the daughter's apparent death, the mocking crowd) contradict it.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
“Furthermore, the woman with the issue of blood is viewed through the lens of prevenient grace and human response: her healing illustrates the synergy of faith. While she must exercise the volition to reach out (vv. 27-28), it is explicitly Christ's power or 'virtue' (v. 30) that affects the cure.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“The woman who pressed through the crowd to touch Jesus is held up as a model for the sinner who must actively respond to the gospel call rather than waiting passively.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
Step 7Render the New Consensus Bible
From the original-language text. The traditions document reception; they do not vote on wording. Every contested wording the rendering settled is listed below, not hidden.
1And they came to the other side of the sea, to the country of the Gerasenes. 2And when he had come out of the boat, immediately a man with an unclean spirit met him out of the tombs, 3who had his dwelling in the tombs. And no one was able to bind him anymore, not even with a chain, 4because he had often been bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been torn apart by him and the fetters broken in pieces, and no one had the strength to tame him. 5And constantly, night and day, in the tombs and in the mountains, he was crying out and cutting himself with stones. 6And seeing Jesus from a distance, he ran and bowed down to him, 7and crying out with a loud voice, he said: "What have I to do with you, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? I adjure you by God, do not torment me." 8For he had been saying to him, "Come out of the man, you unclean spirit!" 9And he asked him, "What is your name?" And he replied, saying to him, "My name is Legion, because we are many." 10And he begged him earnestly that he would not send them out of the country. 11Now there was a great herd of pigs feeding there on the mountainside. 12And all the demons begged him, saying, "Send us into the pigs, so that we may enter into them." 13And immediately Jesus gave them permission. And the unclean spirits came out and entered into the pigs; and the herd rushed down the steep bank into the sea—they were about two thousand—and were drowned in the sea. 14And those who fed the pigs fled and reported it in the city and in the country. And the people came to see what it was that had happened. 15And they came to Jesus, and observed the demon-possessed man sitting, clothed, and in his right mind—the very one who had had the legion—and they were afraid. 16And those who had seen it described to them how it had happened to the demon-possessed man, and about the pigs. 17And they began to beg him to depart from their region. 18And as he was getting into the boat, the man who had been demon-possessed begged him that he might be with him. 19But Jesus did not allow him, but said to him, "Go to your home, to your own people, and report to them how much the Lord has done for you, and how he had mercy on you." 20And he went away and began to proclaim in the Decapolis how much Jesus had done for him, and everyone marveled. 21And when Jesus had crossed over in the boat again to the other side, a great crowd gathered to him, and he was by the sea. 22And one of the synagogue rulers, named Jairus, came, and seeing him, fell at his feet, 23and begged him earnestly, saying, "My little daughter is at the point of death. Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be healed and live." 24And he went with him. And a great crowd followed him, and they pressed against him. 25And a certain woman, who had a flow of blood for twelve years, 26and had suffered much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was not helped at all, but rather grew worse, 27having heard the things concerning Jesus, came up in the crowd behind him and touched his garment. 28For she was saying, "If I just touch his garments, I will be healed." 29And immediately the fountain of her blood was dried up, and she knew in her body that she was healed from her affliction. 30And immediately Jesus, perceiving in himself that the power had gone out from him, turned around in the crowd and said, "Who touched my garments?" 31And his disciples said to him, "You see the crowd pressing against you, and you say, 'Who touched me?'" 32And he looked around to see the woman who had done this. 33But the woman, fearing and trembling, knowing what had happened to her, came and fell down before him and told him the whole truth. 34And he said to her, "Daughter, your faith has healed you. Go in peace, and be cured of your affliction." 35While he was still speaking, people came from the synagogue ruler's house, saying, "Your daughter is dead. Why bother the Teacher any further?" 36But Jesus, overhearing the word being spoken, said to the synagogue ruler, "Do not be afraid, only believe." 37And he allowed no one to follow him, except Peter, James, and John the brother of James. 38And they came to the house of the synagogue ruler, and he saw a commotion, and people weeping and wailing loudly. 39And when he had entered, he said to them, "Why do you make a commotion and weep? The child is not dead, but is sleeping." 40And they ridiculed him. But he, having put them all out, took the father and the mother of the child, and those who were with him, and went in where the child was lying. 41And taking the child by the hand, he said to her, "Talitha cumi," which is translated, "Little girl, I say to you, arise." 42And immediately the girl arose and walked, for she was twelve years old. And immediately they were amazed with great amazement. 43And he gave them strict orders that no one should know this, and commanded that something be given to her to eat.
Choices made — every dispute the rendering settled
| Verse | Source | Options | Choice | Why | Cat. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | τὸ πέραν | “other side” (T) vs “strait” (T) | other side | aligns with the primary geographical sense of crossing the Sea of Galilee | lexical |
| v1 | εἰς | “into” (T) vs “to” (T) | to | creates natural English phrasing while establishing the spatial direction | stylistic |
| v1 | Γερασηνῶν | “Gadarenes” (T) vs “Gerasenes” (T, S, A) vs “Gerasens” (T) | Gerasenes | follows the best early manuscript readings which support the difficult geographical reading | textual |
| v1 | εἰς τὸ πέραν... εἰς τὴν χώραν | repetition of the preposition εἰς (S) vs flattening (T) | flattening | rendered as 'to... to' rather than strictly mirroring the double 'into... into' for English fluency | stylistic |
| v2 | ἐν πνεύματι | “with” (T, S) vs “possessed by” (T) | with | preserves the literal spatial relationship of the Greek preposition 'ἐν' rather than interpreting possession | interpretive |
| v2 | ἐν πνεύματι ἀκαθάρτῳ | zero-article pattern preserved (S) vs flattened (T) | preserved | maintains the indefinite character of the original Greek construction | grammatical |
| v3 | οὐδὲ ἁλύσει οὐκέτι οὐδεὶς | multiple negation pattern preserved (S) vs simplified (T) | preserved | maintains the forceful emphasis of the source text's triple negation | grammatical |
| v4 | πέδαις καὶ ἁλύσεσιν... τὰς ἁλύσεις καὶ τὰς πέδας | chiasm of nouns preserved (S) vs sequential ordering (T) | preserved | maintains the literary structural feature of crossing terms found in the Greek | stylistic |
| v4 | δεδέσθαι | cognate connection preserved (S) vs obscured (T) | preserved | connects the past participle to the infinitive used in the preceding verse | lexical |
| v5 | ἐν τοῖς μνήμασιν καὶ ἐν τοῖς ὄρεσιν | “tombs and in the mountains” (T, S) vs “mountains and in the tombs” (T) | tombs and in the mountains | follows the direct word order of the critical Greek text | textual |
| v5 | μνήμασιν | “tombs” (T, S) vs “monuments” (T) | tombs | accurately conveys the burial context of the structures | lexical |
| v5 | ἐν τοῖς... καὶ ἐν τοῖς | spatial repetition preserved (S) vs flattened (T) | preserved | maintains the rhythmic repetition of 'in the' reflecting the Greek preposition | stylistic |
| v6 | τὸν Ἰησοῦν | definite article used with a proper name preserved (S) vs flattened (T) | flattened | English syntax does not support definite articles before standard proper names | grammatical |
| v6 | προσεκύνησεν | “worshipped” (T) vs “bowed down to” (T) vs “bowed before” (T) vs “did homage” (T) vs “adored” (T) | bowed down to | conveys deep physical reverence without strictly necessitating theological worship from a demon | lexical |
| v7 | κράξας | “crying out” (T) vs “cried” (T) vs “crying” (T) vs “having called” (T) | crying out | captures the ongoing or attendant action of the aorist participle in this context | grammatical |
| v7 | λέγει | “he” (T, S) vs “and said” (T) vs “he saith” (T) vs “he says” (T) | he said | translates the historical present for a contemporary audience using standard past narrative tense | textual |
| v7 | τί ἐμοὶ καὶ σοί | “do with thee” (T) vs “you” (T) vs “me and to” (T) | do with you | renders the semitic idiom naturally in modern English while avoiding archaisms | grammatical |
| v7 | Ἰησοῦ, τοῦ θεοῦ, τὸν θεόν | divine-name distribution preserved (S) vs harmonized (T) | preserved | distinguishes Jesus from the titles of God exactly as arranged in the text | interpretive |
| v7 | τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ὑψίστου | article pattern preserved (S) vs smoothed (T) | smoothed | rendered as 'Most High God' rather than 'the God the Most High' for natural syntax | grammatical |
| v8 | ἔξελθε | “Come” (T) vs “forth thou unclean spirit” (T) vs “forth spirit unclean” (T) vs “forth unclean spirit” (T) vs “Go” (T) | Come out of the man, you unclean spirit! | provides a forceful imperative that matches the spatial dynamic of exiting the man | lexical |
| v8 | τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἀκάθαρτον | specific definite article pattern preserved (S) vs vocative flattening (T) | vocative flattening | the articular construction functions as a vocative which requires flattening in English | grammatical |
| v9 | σοι | “thy” (T) vs “your” (T) | your | modernizes the archaic second-person pronoun | stylistic |
| v9 | ὅτι | “is Legion for” (T) vs “because” (T, S) | because | accurately reflects the explanatory conjunction 'ὅτι' | lexical |
| v9 | ὄνομά μοι... πολλοί ἐσμεν | number shift singular to plural preserved (S) vs harmonized (T) | preserved | retains the jarring shift from 'my name' to 'we are many' present in the Greek text | grammatical |
| v9 | λεγιὼν | military designation as literal (T, S) vs sociopolitical allegory (A) | literal | translates the Latin loanword directly without resolving the interpretive dispute over allegorical imperial subversion | interpretive |
| v10 | παρεκάλει | “besought” (T) vs “begged” (T) vs “was calling on” (T) | begged | uses contemporary vocabulary for intense pleading | lexical |
| v10 | παρεκάλει... αὐτὰ | number shift singular verb to neuter plural pronoun preserved (S) vs harmonized (T) | preserved | maintains the source text's shift in grammatical number indicating the collective nature of the entity | grammatical |
| v11 | δὲ | “Now” (T) vs “And” (T) vs “on the mountainside” (T) | Now | effectively translates the transitional postpositive particle 'δὲ' | textual |
| v11 | χοίρων | “swine” (T) vs “pigs” (T, A) | pigs | utilizes standard modern English vocabulary for the herd animals | lexical |
| v11 | ἀγέλη χοίρων μεγάλη | definite article pattern with noun and adjective preserved (S) vs flattened (T) | flattened | English syntax requires reordering the adjective before the noun without multiple articles | grammatical |
| v12 | παρεκάλεσαν | number shift to plural verb preserved (S) vs flattened (T) | preserved | reflects the grammatical pluralization of the demons' plea | grammatical |
| v13 | ἐπέτρεψεν αὐτοῖς εὐθέως ὁ Ἰησοῦς | “And forthwith Jesus gave” (T) vs “immediately” (T) vs “At once” (T) vs “he” (T) vs “immediately allowed” (T) | And immediately Jesus gave them permission | synthesizes the immediate action and the granting of leave clearly | lexical |
| v13 | ἐξελθόντα | “came” (T) vs “went out and entered” (T) vs “going” (T) vs “did enter” (T) | came out and entered | translates the aorist participle as an independent sequential action for readability | grammatical |
| v13 | ἐπνίγοντο | “choked” (T) vs “drowned” (T) vs “stifled” (T) | drowned | provides the most precise standard English term for death by asphyxiation in water | lexical |
| v13 | τὰ πνεύματα... εἰσῆλθον | constructio ad sensum number shift preserved (S) vs grammaticalized (T) | preserved | keeps the plural verb attached to the neuter plural subject reflecting the source text's logic | grammatical |
| v14 | αὐτοὺς χοίρους | demonstrative/article pattern preserved (S) vs simplified (T) | simplified | translates 'αὐτοὺς' in context simply as 'the pigs' rather than 'the pigs themselves' to avoid redundancy | grammatical |
| v15 | ἔρχονται... καὶ θεωροῦσιν | “come to” (T) vs “came” (T) vs “unto” (T) | came | translates the historical present verbs into narrative past tense for consistency | grammatical |
| v15 | καθήμενον καὶ ἱματισμένον καὶ σωφρονοῦντα | assonance in participle endings preserved (S) vs flattened (T) | flattened | the repetitive Greek '-μένον' endings cannot be mirrored perfectly without distorting English meaning | stylistic |
| v16 | οἱ ἰδόντες | “And they that saw” (T) vs “had seen” (T) vs “Those who” (T) vs “those having seen” (T) | those who had seen | renders the substantival aorist participle smoothly | grammatical |
| v16 | διηγήσαντο | “told” (T) vs “declared to” (T) vs “declared unto” (T) vs “related to” (T) | described to | captures the detailed nature of providing a full narrative account | lexical |
| v17 | ἀπελθεῖν ἀπὸ | “from” (T) vs “to depart out of” (T) vs “go away from” (T) vs “that he would from” (T) | to depart from | provides standard contemporary phrasing for leaving an area | grammatical |
| v17 | ὁρίων | “coasts” (T) vs “borders” (T) vs “region” (T) | region | translates 'ὁρίων' accurately as the surrounding territory rather than modern coastlines | lexical |
| v17 | παρακαλεῖν | repetition of verbal root preserved (S) vs obscured (T) | preserved | keeps the translation 'beg' to link back to the earlier pleas in the narrative | stylistic |
| v18 | ὁ δαιμονισθεὶς | definite article with an aorist participle preserved (S) vs simplified (T) | preserved | renders as 'the man who had been demon-possessed' to highlight the completed state | grammatical |
| v19 | λέγει | “to” (T) vs “saith unto” (T) vs “said to” (T) vs “says to” (T) | said to | translates the historical present verb into contemporary narrative past tense | grammatical |
| v19 | οἶκόν σου πρὸς τοὺς σοὺς | “thy friends” (T) vs “your house to your” (T) vs “house unto thy” (T) vs “house unto thine own” (T) vs “thine own people” (T) | your home, to your own people | captures both the spatial destination and the relational belonging of 'τοὺς σοὺς' | lexical |
| v19 | ὅσα | “how” (T) vs “what” (T) | how much | accurately conveys the quantitative nuance of 'ὅσα' | lexical |
| v19 | πεποίηκεν | “hath done for thee” (T) vs “has you” (T) vs “did to” (T) vs “has” (T) | has done for you | employs standard modern perfect tense phrasing | grammatical |
| v19 | ὁ κύριός | divine-name Kyrios preserved (S) vs altered (T) | preserved | maintains the explicit use of 'Lord' to differentiate from Jesus in the subsequent verse | interpretive |
| v20 | ἀπῆλθεν | “went his way” (T) vs “departed” (T) vs “went away” (T) | went away | translates the basic verb of departure simply and directly | lexical |
| v20 | κηρύσσειν | “publish” (T) vs “proclaim” (T, S) | proclaim | better fits the public, vocal nature of the verb 'κηρύσσειν' | lexical |
| v20 | ἐποίησεν | “had done for” (T) vs “great things” (T) vs “did to” (T) | had done for | maintains syntactic consistency with the parallel phrase in the previous verse | grammatical |
| v20 | ἐθαύμαζον | “wondered” (T) vs “everyone marveled” (T) vs “all men did marvel” (T) vs “marvelled” (T) vs “were wondering” (T) | marveled | provides an elevated yet modern expression of collective astonishment | lexical |
| v20 | ὁ Ἰησοῦς | thematic repetition/contrast substituting the acting subject preserved (S) vs obscured (T) | preserved | retains the stark substitution of Jesus as the subject performing the acts attributed to the Lord | stylistic |
| v21 | παρὰ | “by” (T) vs “nigh unto” (T) vs “near” (T) vs “to” (T) | by | captures the spatial proximity indicated by the preposition 'παρὰ' | lexical |
| v21 | πάλιν εἰς τὸ πέραν... παρὰ τὴν θάλασσαν | spatial inclusio/repetition preserved (S) vs altered (T) | preserved | maintains the author's geographic framing markers indicating the scene shift | stylistic |
| v22 | ἰδού | presence of interjection 'ἰδού' dropped (T) vs preserved (S) | dropped | the archaic 'behold' is dropped as it disrupts natural contemporary syntax here | stylistic |
| v22 | ὀνόματι Ἰάϊρος | “Jairus by name” (T) vs “Jairus” (T) vs “came” (T) vs “Jaïrus” (T) vs “named” (T) | named Jairus | provides standard contemporary phrasing for identifying an individual by name | stylistic |
| v22 | ἰδὼν | “seeing” (T) vs “when he saw” (T) vs “having seen” (T) | seeing | translates the aorist participle effectively as a concurrent circumstantial action | grammatical |
| v22 | πίπτει | “he fell” (T) vs “falleth” (T) vs “doth fall” (T) vs “falls down” (T) vs “falleth down” (T) | fell | resolves the historical present tense to simple narrative past tense | grammatical |
| v23 | παρακαλεῖ | “besought” (T) vs “he” (T) vs “begged” (T) vs “beseecheth” (T) vs “he was calling upon” (T) | begged | resolves historical present to narrative past while modernizing the vocabulary | grammatical |
| v23 | πολλὰ | “much” (T) vs “greatly” (T) | earnestly | translates 'πολλὰ' idiomatically to convey the intensity of the pleading | lexical |
| v23 | ἐσχάτως ἔχει | “is” (T) vs “lieth” (T) | is | translates the idiomatic expression 'ἐσχάτως ἔχει' functionally without inferring literal physical posture | interpretive |
| v23 | σωθῇ | “healed” (T) vs “made healthy” (T) vs “made whole” (T) vs “saved” (T) vs “safe” (T) | healed | translates the verb 'σωθῇ' contextually regarding physical restoration | lexical |
| v23 | ἵνα... ἵνα | repetition of conjunction 'ἵνα' flattened (T) vs preserved (S) | flattened | English syntax demands converting the first 'ἵνα' clause into an imperative rather than maintaining back-to-back purpose clauses | stylistic |
| v24 | ἀπῆλθεν | “He” (T, S) vs “And Jesus” (T) | He | maintains the unstated pronoun subject present in the Greek verb | textual |
| v24 | ὄχλος πολὺς | “a great multitude” (T) vs “much people followed” (T) vs “there was following” (T) vs “a large crowd” (T) vs “many” (T) | a great crowd | modernizes 'multitude' to 'crowd' while accurately conveying the magnitude | lexical |
| v24 | συνέθλιβον | “thronged” (T) vs “they” (T) vs “they pressed upon” (T) vs “they were thronging” (T) vs “pressed on” (T) | pressed against | updates archaic vocabulary to describe the physical pressure of the group | lexical |
| v24 | ὄχλος... συνέθλιβον | number shift singular collective noun with plural verb preserved (S) vs harmonized (T) | preserved | keeps the transition from the singular 'crowd' to the plural 'they pressed' mapping the constructio ad sensum | grammatical |
| v25 | οὖσα ἐν ῥύσει | “who” (T) vs “who a discharge” (T) vs “which had an issue” (T) vs “having” (T) vs “who had a flux” (T) vs “who was under” (T) | who had a flow | smooths the phrasing of 'being in a flow of blood' into standard English | grammatical |
| v25 | γυνὴ τις | indefinite pronoun usage preserved (S) vs specified (T) | preserved | translates 'τις' accurately as 'a certain' | grammatical |
| v26 | τὰ παρ᾽ αὐτῆς πάντα | “all that” (T) vs “everything” (T) | all that | provides an exact translation of 'τὰ παρ᾽ αὐτῆς πάντα' | lexical |
| v26 | πολλὰ παθοῦσα ὑπὸ πολλῶν | alliteration and cognate repetition preserved (S) vs simplified (T) | preserved | maintains the 'suffered much under many' rhetorical structure of the Greek | stylistic |
| v27 | ἀκούσασα | “having” (T) vs “When she had” (T) | having | accurately reflects the aorist active participle describing preceding action | grammatical |
| v27 | τὰ περὶ | “of” (T) vs “the things concerning” (T) vs “about” (T) vs “concerning” (T) | concerning | translates the plural neuter article governing the prepositional phrase elegantly | lexical |
| v27 | ἐλθοῦσα | “came” (T) vs “up behind him” (T) vs “having come” (T) | came up | renders the aorist participle 'ἐλθοῦσα' as a finite action in English syntax | grammatical |
| v27 | ἱματίου | “garment” (T) vs “clothes” (T) | garment | uses the singular form accurately representing the item of clothing | lexical |
| v27 | ἀκούσασα... ἐλθοῦσα | repetition in string of aorist feminine participles flattened (T) vs preserved (S) | flattened | English requires converting one participle into a main verb to prevent an overly complex nested sentence | stylistic |
| v27 | ἥψατο τοῦ ἱματίου | active faith via physical touch (A) vs non-tactile proximity (T) | active faith via physical touch | the rendering remains neutral on whether the physical act inherently demonstrated faith, merely translating the physical touch accurately | interpretive |
| v28 | σωθήσομαι | “shall” (T) vs “will” (T) | will | updates archaic 'shall' to modern indicative intent per the rules | stylistic |
| v28 | ἅψωμαι | cognate root repetition preserved (S) vs obscured (T) | preserved | maintains the repetition of 'touch' connecting her internal thought to her outward action | stylistic |
| v28 | ἐὰν ἅψωμαι κἂν τῶν ἱματίων | unmediated personal faith (A) vs sacramental validation (A) | unmediated personal faith | translates the mechanical action directly without endorsing or resolving the subsequent theological dispute regarding material mediation of grace | interpretive |
| v29 | Καὶ εὐθὺς... ἡ πηγὴ | “And straightway the fountain” (T) vs “Immediately flow” (T) vs “immediately was” (T) vs “immediately her” (T) vs “immediately” (T) vs “forthwith” (T) | And immediately the fountain | provides standard contemporary adverbial phrasing while preserving the metaphorical noun | lexical |
| v29 | ἔγνω | “felt” (T) vs “knew” (T, S) | knew | accurately translates 'ἔγνω' denoting absolute cognitive awareness rather than mere sensation | lexical |
| v29 | πηγὴ τοῦ αἵματος | metaphorical wordplay preserved (S) vs flattened (T) | preserved | retains the literal Greek imagery of a 'fountain' describing the hemorrhage | stylistic |
| v30 | ἐπιγνοὺς | “And Jesus immediately knowing” (T) vs “Jesus” (T) vs “Jesus perceiving” (T) vs “straightway perceiving” (T) vs “Jesus having known” (T) | Jesus, perceiving | employs standard English participial syntax for concurrent cognition | grammatical |
| v30 | ἥψατο | “touched” (T) vs “did touch” (T) vs “has” (T) vs “hath” (T) | touched | translates the aorist indicative as a simple past action without auxiliary verbs | grammatical |
| v30 | ἐξ αὐτοῦ... ἐξελθοῦσαν | cognate prefix repetition preserved (S) vs obscured (T) | preserved | mirrors the double use of 'out' (out from him... gone out) reflective of the Greek 'ἐξ' | stylistic |
| v31 | βλέπεις | “Thou seest” (T) vs “You see” (T) | You see | modernizes archaic pronouns and verb endings | stylistic |
| v31 | ὄχλον συνθλίβοντά σε | “multitude thronging thee” (T) vs “pressing against you” (T) vs “crowd pressing on” (T) | crowd pressing against you | uses contemporary phrasing to indicate physical compression | lexical |
| v31 | ὄχλον συνθλίβοντά | number shift singular collective noun with singular participle preserved (S) vs harmonized (T) | preserved | accurately reflects the syntax change back to singular for the crowd in contrast to verse 24 | grammatical |
| v32 | τὴν... ποιήσασαν | “who” (T) vs “that had done” (T) vs “who did” (T) | who had done | renders the aorist participle seamlessly into a relative clause in English | grammatical |
| v32 | τὴν... ποιήσασαν | article acting as substantive preserved (S) vs supplied noun (T) | supplied noun | English requires inserting 'the woman' or 'the one' to carry the substantival feminine article | grammatical |
| v33 | φοβηθεῖσα | “fearing” (T) vs “having been afraid” (T) vs “frightened” (T) | fearing | translates the aorist passive participle as an active internal state consistent with trembling | grammatical |
| v33 | γέγονεν ἐπ᾽ αὐτῇ | “was done in” (T) vs “had been to” (T) vs “on” (T) vs “had taken place” (T) | had happened to | provides standard contemporary phrasing for an event occurring to a person | grammatical |
| v33 | φοβηθεῖσα καὶ τρέμουσα | assonance in feminine participles preserved (S) vs flattened (T) | preserved | maintains the parallel rhythmic sound through the '-ing' endings 'fearing and trembling' | stylistic |
| v34 | σέσωκέν | “hath made thee whole” (T) vs “has you well” (T) vs “saved” (T) vs “has healed” (T) | has healed | utilizes contemporary terminology for physical restoration | lexical |
| v34 | ὑγιὴς ἀπὸ τῆς μάστιγός | “whole of thy plague” (T) vs “cured your disease” (T) vs “from” (T) vs “well scourge” (T) vs “healed infirmity” (T) vs “thou disease” (T) | cured of your affliction | updates archaic 'plague' to a fitting modern equivalent for chronic disease | lexical |
| v34 | ἡ πίστις σου σέσωκέν σε | justifying faith as passive reception (A) vs active catalyst (A) | justifying faith as passive reception | the rendering translates 'your faith has healed you' directly without resolving whether it was an active catalyst or a passive reception | interpretive |
| v34 | σέσωκέν... μάστιγός | thematic repetition preserved (S) vs disconnected (T) | preserved | keeps the direct verbal connections of 'healed' (saved) and 'affliction' (scourge) linked to their earlier usage | stylistic |
| v35 | ἔτι αὐτοῦ λαλοῦντος ἔρχονται | “was still speaking people” (T) vs “yet spake there came” (T) vs “they come” (T) vs “is speaking come” (T) vs “was speaking they come” (T) vs “was speaking” (T) vs “was speaking some come” (T) | was still speaking, people came | harmonizes the genitive absolute with the historical present main verb into standard English narrative past | grammatical |
| v35 | ἀπέθανεν | “is dead” (T) vs “did die” (T) vs “has died” (T) | is dead | translates the aorist verb idiomatically to express the present reality of her state | grammatical |
| v35 | σκύλλεις | “troublest thou” (T) vs “bother” (T) vs “still dost harass” (T) vs “dost trouble” (T) | bother | modernizes the vocabulary for causing unnecessary trouble | lexical |
| v35 | τὸν διδάσκαλον | “Master any further” (T) vs “Teacher” (T) vs “Teacher more” (T) | Teacher any further | translates 'διδάσκαλον' precisely as Teacher rather than Master | lexical |
| v36 | δὲ | “But” (T, S) vs “As soon as” (T) vs “And” (T) | But | reflects the standard contrastive translation of 'δὲ' while preserving 'εὐθέως' as immediately/overhearing | textual |
| v36 | παρακούσας | “heard” (T) vs “immediately having” (T) vs “when he” (T) vs “not heeding” (T) vs “having” (T) vs “overhearing” (S) | overhearing | captures the nuanced force of 'παρακούσας' which implies hearing a remark made to another | lexical |
| v36 | μὴ φοβοῦ | “Be not afraid” (T) vs “Fear” (T) vs “Don’t” (T) | Do not be afraid | employs standard modern English syntax for negative imperatives | stylistic |
| v36 | λόγον λαλούμενον | cognate/alliterative phrase preserved (S) vs simplified (T) | preserved | maintains the repetition by translating 'the word being spoken' | stylistic |
| v37 | συνακολουθῆσαι | “follow” (T) vs “with” (T) vs “accompany” (T) | follow | accurately translates the compound verb 'συνακολουθῆσαι' in this context | lexical |
| v37 | εἰ μὴ | “save” (T) vs “except” (T) vs “but” (T) | except | updates archaic 'save' to a modern preposition of exclusion | lexical |
| v37 | οὐκ ἀφῆκεν οὐδένα | double negative construction preserved (S) vs flattened (T) | flattened | English grammar does not permit standard double negatives, necessitating 'allowed no one' | grammatical |
| v38 | ἔρχονται | “And he cometh” (T) vs “they come” (T, S) vs “came” (T) vs “comes” (T) | they came | translates the plural historic present verb accurately into narrative past | textual |
| v38 | ἀλαλάζοντας πολλά | “wailing” (T) vs “wailed greatly” (T) vs “great wailing” (T) vs “wailing much” (T) | wailing loudly | provides standard contemporary adverbial modification | grammatical |
| v38 | κλαίοντας καὶ ἀλαλάζοντας | assonance in present active plural participles preserved (S) vs flattened (T) | preserved | maintains parallel '-ing' structure 'weeping and wailing' to mimic the Greek repetition | stylistic |
| v39 | θορυβεῖσθε | “do make a tumult” (T) vs “do you an uproar” (T) vs “make ye this ado” (T) vs “a tumult” (T) vs “tumult” (T) vs “you” (T) | make a commotion | updates archaic vocabulary for an unruly disturbance | lexical |
| v39 | ἀπέθανεν | “dead” (T) vs “die” (T) vs “died” (T) | dead | translates the aorist verb idiomatically as a state of being in modern English | grammatical |
| v39 | κλαίετε | thematic repetition of 'κλαίετε' preserved (S) vs obscured (T) | preserved | keeps the direct link to 'weeping' mentioned in the previous verse | stylistic |
| v40 | κατεγέλων | “laughed” (T) vs “derided” (T) vs “ridiculed” (T) vs “were laughing at” (T) | ridiculed | accurately conveys the hostile mocking nature of 'κατεγέλων' | lexical |
| v40 | ἐκβαλὼν | “having” (T) vs “had” (T) | having | preserves the sequential aorist participle describing prior action | grammatical |
| v40 | εἰσπορεύεται | “entereth” (T) vs “goeth” (T) vs “went” (T) vs “enters” (T) | went in | resolves historical present to normal past narrative tense | grammatical |
| v40 | τὸ παιδίον | “child” (T, S) vs “damsel was lying” (T) vs “child is” (T) | child | translates 'παιδίον' directly reflecting the primary textual evidence | textual |
| v40 | τὸν πατέρα... καὶ τὴν μητέρα | article structure defining parental pairs preserved (S) vs combined (T) | preserved | keeps the double definite article 'the father and the mother' specifying the pair | grammatical |
| v41 | σοὶ λέγω, ἔγειρε | “to” (T) vs “say unto thee arise” (T) vs “tell you get up” (T) | say to you, arise | modernizes the pronoun but retains the direct command 'arise' | lexical |
| v41 | ταλιθα κουμ, ὅ ἐστιν μεθερμηνευόμενον, τὸ κοράσιον, σοὶ λέγω, ἔγειρε | bilingual wordplay preserved (S) vs omitted (T) | preserved | retains the explicit textual translation from Aramaic into Greek (and subsequently English) | stylistic |
| v42 | εὐθὺς | “Immediately” (T) vs “And straightway” (T) vs “forthwith” (T) | immediately | uses standard modern vocabulary for instant action | lexical |
| v42 | ἀνέστη τὸ κοράσιον | “damsel arose” (T) vs “rose up” (T) vs “girl arose” (T) | girl arose | updates archaic 'damsel' to contemporary 'girl' | lexical |
| v42 | περιεπάτει· ἦν γὰρ | “walked for” (T) vs “was walking” (T) vs “and” (T) | walked, for | translates the imperfect verb indicating ongoing subsequent action, smoothed for English coordination | grammatical |
| v42 | ἐξέστησαν... ἐκστάσει | cognate construction preserved (S) vs simplified (T) | preserved | maintains the rhetorical doubling of 'amazed with great amazement' mirroring the Greek | stylistic |
| v43 | διεστείλατο | “charged” (T) vs “strictly ordered” (T) | gave strict orders | provides standard contemporary phrasing for an intense command | lexical |
| v43 | μηδεὶς | “man should” (T) vs “one” (T) vs “one may” (T) | one should | modernizes 'no man' to the inclusive 'no one' | lexical |
| v43 | μηδεὶς | absolute negation pattern preserved (S) vs modified (T) | preserved | maintains the structural emphasis of complete secrecy demanded by the verb | grammatical |
Limits worth knowing
- This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
- The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
- The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
- The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
- One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
- The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
- Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
- The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.