ManyBibles

← Back to Mark 5 · Full Mark 5 study page

How the consensus for Mark 5 was built

Every step of the working, exactly as it ran. Nothing here is hand-edited: the translations came from this app’s database, each tradition’s reading was generated in isolated calls that do not see one another (isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses), and the consensus was synthesized from those readings alone.

Model:
gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)
Generated:
Jul 18, 2026, 5:49 PM UTC
Method:
claim-audited, source-language-based, family-weighted
Cross-stage consistency audit: passed — translation facts, tier arithmetic, prose vocabulary, and Choices-Made rationales checked against each other and the printed texts.

Step 1Read the passage in every public-domain translation

7 translations, fed to every step. The AI-generated NCB is never a source.

WEB · World English Bible

1They came to the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes. 2When he had come out of the boat, immediately a man with an unclean spirit met him out of the tombs. 3He lived in the tombs. Nobody could bind him any more, not even with chains, 4because he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been torn apart by him, and the fetters broken in pieces. Nobody had the strength to tame him. 5Always, night and day, in the tombs and in the mountains, he was crying out, and cutting himself with stones. 6When he saw Jesus from afar, he ran and bowed down to him, 7and crying out with a loud voice, he said, “What have I to do with you, Jesus, you Son of the Most High God? I adjure you by God, don’t torment me.” 8For he said to him, “Come out of the man, you unclean spirit!” 9He asked him, “What is your name?” He said to him, “My name is Legion, for we are many.” 10He begged him much that he would not send them away out of the country. 11Now on the mountainside there was a great herd of pigs feeding. 12All the demons begged him, saying, “Send us into the pigs, that we may enter into them.” 13At once Jesus gave them permission. The unclean spirits came out and entered into the pigs. The herd of about two thousand rushed down the steep bank into the sea, and they were drowned in the sea. 14Those who fed the pigs fled, and told it in the city and in the country. The people came to see what it was that had happened. 15They came to Jesus, and saw him who had been possessed by demons sitting, clothed, and in his right mind, even him who had the legion; and they were afraid. 16Those who saw it declared to them what happened to him who was possessed by demons, and about the pigs. 17They began to beg him to depart from their region. 18As he was entering into the boat, he who had been possessed by demons begged him that he might be with him. 19He didn’t allow him, but said to him, “Go to your house, to your friends, and tell them what great things the Lord has done for you and how he had mercy on you.” 20He went his way, and began to proclaim in Decapolis how Jesus had done great things for him, and everyone marveled. 21When Jesus had crossed back over in the boat to the other side, a great multitude was gathered to him; and he was by the sea. 22Behold, one of the rulers of the synagogue, Jairus by name, came; and seeing him, he fell at his feet 23and begged him much, saying, “My little daughter is at the point of death. Please come and lay your hands on her, that she may be made healthy, and live.” 24He went with him, and a great multitude followed him, and they pressed upon him on all sides. 25A certain woman who had a discharge of blood for twelve years, 26and had suffered many things by many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was no better, but rather grew worse, 27having heard the things concerning Jesus, came up behind him in the crowd and touched his clothes. 28For she said, “If I just touch his clothes, I will be made well.” 29Immediately the flow of her blood was dried up, and she felt in her body that she was healed of her affliction. 30Immediately Jesus, perceiving in himself that the power had gone out from him, turned around in the crowd and asked, “Who touched my clothes?” 31His disciples said to him, “You see the multitude pressing against you, and you say, ‘Who touched me?’” 32He looked around to see her who had done this thing. 33But the woman, fearing and trembling, knowing what had been done to her, came and fell down before him, and told him all the truth. 34He said to her, “Daughter, your faith has made you well. Go in peace, and be cured of your disease.” 35While he was still speaking, people came from the synagogue ruler’s house, saying, “Your daughter is dead. Why bother the Teacher any more?” 36But Jesus, when he heard the message spoken, immediately said to the ruler of the synagogue, “Don’t be afraid, only believe.” 37He allowed no one to follow him except Peter, James, and John the brother of James. 38He came to the synagogue ruler’s house, and he saw an uproar, weeping, and great wailing. 39When he had entered in, he said to them, “Why do you make an uproar and weep? The child is not dead, but is asleep.” 40They ridiculed him. But he, having put them all out, took the father of the child, her mother, and those who were with him, and went in where the child was lying. 41Taking the child by the hand, he said to her, “Talitha cumi!” which means, being interpreted, “Girl, I tell you, get up!” 42Immediately the girl rose up and walked, for she was twelve years old. They were amazed with great amazement. 43He strictly ordered them that no one should know this, and commanded that something should be given to her to eat.

KJV · King James Version

1And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes. 2And when he was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit, 3Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains: 4Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him. 5And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones. 6But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him, 7And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not. 8For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit. 9And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many. 10And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country. 11Now there was there nigh unto the mountains a great herd of swine feeding. 12And all the devils besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them. 13And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and were choked in the sea. 14And they that fed the swine fled, and told it in the city, and in the country. And they went out to see what it was that was done. 15And they come to Jesus, and see him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid. 16And they that saw it told them how it befell to him that was possessed with the devil, and also concerning the swine. 17And they began to pray him to depart out of their coasts. 18And when he was come into the ship, he that had been possessed with the devil prayed him that he might be with him. 19Howbeit Jesus suffered him not, but saith unto him, Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had compassion on thee. 20And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and all men did marvel. 21And when Jesus was passed over again by ship unto the other side, much people gathered unto him: and he was nigh unto the sea. 22And, behold, there cometh one of the rulers of the synagogue, Jairus by name; and when he saw him, he fell at his feet, 23And besought him greatly, saying, My little daughter lieth at the point of death: I pray thee, come and lay thy hands on her, that she may be healed; and she shall live. 24And Jesus went with him; and much people followed him, and thronged him. 25And a certain woman, which had an issue of blood twelve years, 26And had suffered many things of many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was nothing bettered, but rather grew worse, 27When she had heard of Jesus, came in the press behind, and touched his garment. 28For she said, If I may touch but his clothes, I shall be whole. 29And straightway the fountain of her blood was dried up; and she felt in her body that she was healed of that plague. 30And Jesus, immediately knowing in himself that virtue had gone out of him, turned him about in the press, and said, Who touched my clothes? 31And his disciples said unto him, Thou seest the multitude thronging thee, and sayest thou, Who touched me? 32And he looked round about to see her that had done this thing. 33But the woman fearing and trembling, knowing what was done in her, came and fell down before him, and told him all the truth. 34And he said unto her, Daughter, thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace, and be whole of thy plague. 35While he yet spake, there came from the ruler of the synagogue’s house certain which said, Thy daughter is dead: why troublest thou the Master any further? 36As soon as Jesus heard the word that was spoken, he saith unto the ruler of the synagogue, Be not afraid, only believe. 37And he suffered no man to follow him, save Peter, and James, and John the brother of James. 38And he cometh to the house of the ruler of the synagogue, and seeth the tumult, and them that wept and wailed greatly. 39And when he was come in, he saith unto them, Why make ye this ado, and weep? the damsel is not dead, but sleepeth. 40And they laughed him to scorn. But when he had put them all out, he taketh the father and the mother of the damsel, and them that were with him, and entereth in where the damsel was lying. 41And he took the damsel by the hand, and said unto her, Talitha cumi; which is, being interpreted, Damsel, I say unto thee, arise. 42And straightway the damsel arose, and walked; for she was of the age of twelve years. And they were astonished with a great astonishment. 43And he charged them straitly that no man should know it; and commanded that something should be given her to eat.

ASV · American Standard Version

1And they came to the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gerasenes. 2And when he was come out of the boat, straightway there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit, 3who had his dwelling in the tombs: and no man could any more bind him, no, not with a chain; 4because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been rent asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: and no man had strength to tame him. 5And always, night and day, in the tombs and in the mountains, he was crying out, and cutting himself with stones. 6And when he saw Jesus from afar, he ran and worshipped him; 7and crying out with a loud voice, he saith, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the Most High God? I adjure thee by God, torment me not. 8For he said unto him, Come forth, thou unclean spirit, out of the man. 9And he asked him, What is thy name? And he saith unto him, My name is Legion; for we are many. 10And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country. 11Now there was there on the mountain side a great herd of swine feeding. 12And they besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them. 13And he gave them leave. And the unclean spirits came out, and entered into the swine: and the herd rushed down the steep into the sea, in number about two thousand; and they were drowned in the sea. 14And they that fed them fled, and told it in the city, and in the country. And they came to see what it was that had come to pass. 15And they come to Jesus, and behold him that was possessed with demons sitting, clothed and in his right mind, even him that had the legion: and they were afraid. 16And they that saw it declared unto them how it befell him that was possessed with demons, and concerning the swine. 17And they began to beseech him to depart from their borders. 18And as he was entering into the boat, he that had been possessed with demons besought him that he might be with him. 19And he suffered him not, but saith unto him, Go to thy house unto thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and how he had mercy on thee. 20And he went his way, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and all men marvelled. 21And when Jesus had crossed over again in the boat unto the other side, a great multitude was gathered unto him; and he was by the sea. 22And there cometh one of the rulers of the synagogue, Jaïrus by name; and seeing him, he falleth at his feet, 23and beseecheth him much, saying, My little daughter is at the point of death: I pray thee, that thou come and lay thy hands on her, that she may be made whole, and live. 24And he went with him; and a great multitude followed him, and they thronged him. 25And a woman, who had an issue of blood twelve years, 26and had suffered many things of many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was nothing bettered, but rather grew worse, 27having heard the things concerning Jesus, came in the crowd behind, and touched his garment. 28For she said, If I touch but his garments, I shall be made whole. 29And straightway the fountain of her blood was dried up; and she felt in her body that she was healed of her plague. 30And straightway Jesus, perceiving in himself that the power proceeding from him had gone forth, turned him about in the crowd, and said, Who touched my garments? 31And his disciples said unto him, Thou seest the multitude thronging thee, and sayest thou, Who touched me? 32And he looked round about to see her that had done this thing. 33But the woman fearing and trembling, knowing what had been done to her, came and fell down before him, and told him all the truth. 34And he said unto her, Daughter, thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace, and be whole of thy plague. 35While he yet spake, they come from the ruler of the synagogue’s house, saying, Thy daughter is dead: why troublest thou the Teacher any further? 36But Jesus, not heeding the word spoken, saith unto the ruler of the synagogue, Fear not, only believe. 37And he suffered no man to follow with him, save Peter, and James, and John the brother of James. 38And they come to the house of the ruler of the synagogue; and he beholdeth a tumult, and many weeping and wailing greatly. 39And when he was entered in, he saith unto them, Why make ye a tumult, and weep? the child is not dead, but sleepeth. 40And they laughed him to scorn. But he, having put them all forth, taketh the father of the child and her mother and them that were with him, and goeth in where the child was. 41And taking the child by the hand, he saith unto her, Talitha cumi; which is, being interpreted, Damsel, I say unto thee, Arise. 42And straightway the damsel rose up, and walked; for she was twelve years old. And they were amazed straightway with a great amazement. 43And he charged them much that no man should know this: and he commanded that something should be given her to eat.

YLT · Young's Literal Translation

1And they came to the other side of the sea, to the region of the Gadarenes, 2and he having come forth out of the boat, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit, 3who had his dwelling in the tombs, and not even with chains was any one able to bind him, 4because that he many times with fetters and chains had been bound, and pulled in pieces by him had been the chains, and the fetters broken in pieces, and none was able to tame him, 5and always, night and day, in the mountains, and in the tombs he was, crying and cutting himself with stones. 6And, having seen Jesus from afar, he ran and bowed before him, 7and having called with a loud voice, he said, `What--to me and to thee, Jesus, Son of God the Most High? I adjure thee by God, mayest thou not afflict me!' 8(for he said to him, `Come forth, spirit unclean, out of the man,') 9and he was questioning him, `What <FI>is<Fi> thy name?' and he answered, saying, `Legion <FI>is<Fi> my name, because we are many;' 10and he was calling on him much, that he may not send them out of the region. 11And there was there, near the mountains, a great herd of swine feeding, 12and all the demons did call upon him, saying, `Send us to the swine, that into them we may enter;' 13and immediately Jesus gave them leave, and having come forth, the unclean spirits did enter into the swine, and the herd did rush down the steep place to the sea--and they were about two thousand--and they were choked in the sea. 14And those feeding the swine did flee, and told in the city, and in the fields, and they came forth to see what it is that hath been done; 15and they come unto Jesus, and see the demoniac, sitting, and clothed, and right-minded--him having had the legion--and they were afraid; 16and those having seen <FI>it<Fi> , declared to them how it had come to pass to the demoniac, and about the swine; 17and they began to call upon him to go away from their borders. 18And he having gone into the boat, the demoniac was calling on him that he may be with him, 19and Jesus did not suffer him, but saith to him, `Go away to thy house, unto thine own <FI>friends<Fi> , and tell them how great things the Lord did to thee, and dealt kindly with thee; 20and he went away, and began to proclaim in the Decapolis how great things Jesus did to him, and all were wondering. 21And Jesus having passed over in the boat again to the other side, there was gathered a great multitude to him, and he was near the sea, 22and lo, there doth come one of the chiefs of the synagogue, by name Jairus, and having seen him, he doth fall at his feet, 23and he was calling upon him much, saying--`My little daughter is at the last extremity--that having come, thou mayest lay on her <FI>thy<Fi> hands, so that she may be saved, and she shall live;' 24and he went away with him. And there was following him a great multitude, and they were thronging him, 25and a certain woman, having an issue of blood twelve years, 26and many things having suffered under many physicians, and having spent all that she had, and having profited nothing, but rather having come to the worse, 27having heard about Jesus, having come in the multitude behind, she touched his garment, 28for she said--`If even his garments I may touch, I shall be saved;' 29and immediately was the fountain of her blood dried up, and she knew in the body that she hath been healed of the plague. 30And immediately Jesus having known in himself that out of him power had gone forth, having turned about in the multitude, said, `Who did touch my garments?' 31and his disciples said to him, `Thou seest the multitude thronging thee, and thou sayest, `Who did touch me!' 32And he was looking round to see her who did this, 33and the woman, having been afraid, and trembling, knowing what was done on her, came, and fell down before him, and told him all the truth, 34and he said to her, `Daughter, thy faith hath saved thee; go away in peace, and be whole from thy plague.' 35As he is yet speaking, there come from the chief of the synagogue's <FI>house, certain<Fi> , saying--`Thy daughter did die, why still dost thou harass the Teacher?' 36And Jesus immediately, having heard the word that is spoken, saith to the chief of the synagogue, `Be not afraid, only believe.' 37And he did not suffer any one to follow with him, except Peter, and James, and John the brother of James; 38and he cometh to the house of the chief of the synagogue, and seeth a tumult, much weeping and wailing; 39and having gone in he saith to them, `Why do ye make a tumult, and weep? the child did not die, but doth sleep; 40and they were laughing at him. And he, having put all forth, doth take the father of the child, and the mother, and those with him, and goeth in where the child is lying, 41and, having taken the hand of the child, he saith to her, `Talitha cumi;' which is, being interpreted, `Damsel (I say to thee), arise.' 42And immediately the damsel arose, and was walking, for she was twelve years <FI>old<Fi> ; and they were amazed with a great amazement, 43and he charged them much, that no one may know this thing, and he said that there be given to her to eat.

Darby · Darby Translation

1And they came to the other side of the sea, to the country of the Gadarenes. 2And immediately on his going out of the ship there met him out of the tombs a man possessed by an unclean spirit, 3who had his dwelling in the tombs; and no one was able to bind him, not even with chains; 4because he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been torn asunder by him, and the fetters were shattered; and no one was able to subdue him. 5And continually night and day, in the tombs and in the mountains, he was crying and cutting himself with stones. 6But seeing Jesus from afar off, he ran and did him homage, 7and crying with a loud voice he says, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? I adjure thee by God, torment me not. 8For he said to him, Come forth, unclean spirit, out of the man. 9And he asked him, What is thy name? And he says to him, Legion is my name, because we are many. 10And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country. 11Now there was there just at the mountain a great herd of swine feeding; 12and they besought him, saying, Send us into the swine that we may enter into them. 13And Jesus [immediately] allowed them. And the unclean spirits going out entered into the swine, and the herd rushed down the steep slope, into the sea (about two thousand), and were choked in the sea. 14And those that were feeding them fled and reported it in the city and in the country. And they went out to see what it was that had taken place. 15And they come to Jesus, and they see the possessed of demons sitting [and] clothed and sensible, [him] that had had the legion: and they were afraid. 16And they that had seen [it] related to them how it had happened to the [man] possessed by demons, and concerning the swine. 17And they began to beg him to depart from their coasts. 18And as he went on board ship, the man that had been possessed by demons besought him that he might be with him. 19And he suffered him not, but says to him, Go to thine home to thine own people, and tell them how great things the Lord has done for thee, and has had mercy on thee. 20And he went away and began to proclaim in the Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him; and all wondered. 21And Jesus having passed over in the ship again to the other side, a great crowd gathered to him; and he was by the sea. 22And [behold] there comes one of the rulers of the synagogue, by name Jairus, and seeing him, falls down at his feet; 23and he besought him much, saying, My little daughter is at extremity; [I pray] that thou shouldest come and lay thy hands upon her so that she may be healed, and may live. 24And he went with him, and a large crowd followed him and pressed on him. 25And a certain woman who had had a flux of blood twelve years, 26and had suffered much under many physicians, and had spent everything she had and had found no advantage from it, but had rather got worse, 27having heard concerning Jesus, came in the crowd behind and touched his clothes; 28for she said, If I shall touch but his clothes I shall be healed. 29And immediately her fountain of blood was dried up, and she knew in her body that she was cured from the scourge. 30And immediately Jesus, knowing in himself the power that had gone out of him, turning round in the crowd said, Who has touched my clothes? 31And his disciples said to him, Thou seest the crowd pressing on thee, and sayest thou, Who touched me? 32And he looked round about to see her who had done this. 33But the woman, frightened and trembling, knowing what had taken place in her, came and fell down before him, and told him all the truth. 34And he said to her, Daughter, thy faith has healed thee; go in peace, and be well of thy scourge. 35While he was yet speaking, they come from the ruler of the synagogue's [house], saying, Thy daughter has died, why troublest thou the teacher any further? 36But Jesus [immediately], having heard the word spoken, says to the ruler of the synagogue, Fear not; only believe. 37And he suffered no one to accompany him save Peter and James, and John the brother of James. 38And he comes to the house of the ruler of the synagogue, and sees the tumult, and people weeping and wailing greatly. 39And entering in he says to them, Why do ye make a tumult and weep? the child has not died, but sleeps. 40And they derided him. But he, having put [them] all out, takes with [him] the father of the child, and the mother, and those that were with him, and enters in where the child was lying. 41And having laid hold of the hand of the child, he says to her, Talitha koumi, which is, interpreted, Damsel, I say to thee, Arise. 42And immediately the damsel arose and walked, for she was twelve years old. And they were astonished with great astonishment. 43And he charged them much that no one should know this; and he desired that [something] should be given her to eat.

Webster · Webster Bible

1And they came over to the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes. 2And when he had come out of the boat, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit, 3Who had [his] dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains: 4For he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any [man] tame him. 5And always, night and day, he was on the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones. 6But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshiped him, 7And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, [thou] Son of the Most High God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not. 8(For he said to him, Come out of the man, [thou] unclean spirit.) 9And he asked him, What [is] thy name? And he answered, saying, My name [is] Legion: for we are many. 10And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country. 11Now there was there nigh to the mountains a great herd of swine feeding. 12And all the demons besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them. 13And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea (they were about two thousand) and were choked in the sea. 14And they that fed the swine fled, and told [it] in the city, and in the country. And they went out to see what it was that was done. 15And they come to Jesus, and see him that was possessed with the demon, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid. 16And they that saw [it] told them how it befell him that was possessed with the demon, and [also] concerning the swine. 17And they began to pray him to depart out of their borders. 18And when he had come into the boat, he that had been possessed with the demon prayed him that he might be with him. 19Yet Jesus suffered him not, but saith to him, Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had compassion on thee. 20And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him. And all [men] wondered. 21And when Jesus had passed over again in a boat to the other side, much people gathered to him: and he was nigh to the sea. 22And behold, there cometh one of the rulers of the synagogue, Jairus by name; and when he saw him, he fell at his feet, 23And besought him greatly, saying, My little daughter lieth at the point of death: [I pray thee], come and lay thy hands on her, that she may be healed; and she will live. 24And [Jesus] went with him; and many people followed him, and thronged him. 25And a certain woman who had an issue of blood twelve years, 26And had suffered many things from many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was not relieved, but rather grew worse, 27When she had heard of Jesus, came in the crowd behind, and touched his garment. 28For she said, If I may touch but his clothes, I shall be whole. 29And immediately the fountain of her blood was dried up; and she felt in [her] body that she was healed of that infirmity. 30And Jesus, immediately knowing in himself that virtue had gone out of him, turned him about in the throng, and said, Who touched my clothes? 31And his disciples said to him, Thou seest the multitude thronging thee, and sayest thou, Who touched me? 32And he looked around, to see her that had done this thing. 33But the woman fearing and trembling, knowing what was done in her, came and fell down before him, and told him all the truth. 34And he said to her, Daughter, thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace, and be healed of thy infirmity. 35While he was yet speaking, there came from the ruler of the synagogue's [house certain] who said, Thy daughter is dead: why troublest thou the Master any further? 36As soon as Jesus heard the word that was spoken, he saith to the ruler of the synagogue, Be not afraid, only believe, 37And he suffered no man to follow him, save Peter, and James, and John the brother of James. 38And he cometh to the house of the ruler of the synagogue, and seeth the tumult, and them that wept and wailed greatly. 39And when he had come in, he saith to them, Why make ye this tumult, and weep? the damsel is not dead, but sleepeth. 40And they derided him: but when he had put them all out, he taketh the father and the mother of the damsel, and them that were with him, and entereth in where the damsel was lying. 41And he took the damsel by the hand, and said to her, Talitha cumi: which is, being interpreted, Damsel (I say to thee) arise. 42And forthwith the damsel arose, and walked; for she was [of the age] of twelve years. And they were astonished with a great astonishment. 43And he charged them strictly that no man should know it; and commanded that something should be given her to eat.

DRC · Douay-Rheims (Challoner)

1And they came over the strait of the sea into the country of the Gerasens. 2And as he went out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the monuments a man with an unclean spirit, 3Who had his dwelling in the tombs, and no man now could bind him, not even with chains. 4For having been often bound with fetters and chains, he had burst the chains, and broken the fetters in pieces, and no one could tame him. 5And he was always day and night in the monuments and in the mountains, crying and cutting himself with stones. 6And seeing Jesus afar off, he ran and adored him. 7And crying with a loud voice, he said: What have I to do with thee, Jesus the Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God that thou torment me not. 8For he said unto him: Go out of the man, thou unclean spirit. 9And he asked him: What is thy name? And he saith to him: My name is Legion, for we are many. 10And he besought him much, that he would not drive him away out of the country. 11And there was there near the mountain a great herd of swine, feeding. 12And the spirits besought him, saying: Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them. 13And Jesus immediately gave them leave. And the unclean spirits going out, entered into the swine: and the herd with great violence was carried headlong into the sea, being about two thousand, and were stifled in the sea. 14And they that fed them fled, and told it in the city and in the fields. And they went out to see what was done: 15And they came to Jesus, and they see him that was troubled with the devil, sitting, clothed, and well in his wits, and they were afraid. 16And they that had seen it, told them, in what manner he had been dealt with who had the devil; and concerning the swine. 17And they began to pray him that he would depart from their coasts. 18And when he went up into the ship, he that had been troubled with the devil, began to beseech him that he might be with him. 19And he admitted him not, but saith to him: Go into thy house to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had mercy on thee. 20And he went his way, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and all men wondered. 21And when Jesus had passed again in the ship over the strait, a great multitude assembled together unto him, and he was nigh unto the sea. 22And there cometh one of the rulers of the synagogue named Jairus: and seeing him, falleth down at his feet. 23And he besought him much, saying: My daughter is at the point of death, come, lay thy hand upon her, that she may be safe, and may live. 24And he went with him, and a great multitude followed him, and they thronged him. 25And a woman who was under an issue of blood twelve years, 26And had suffered many things from many physicians; and had spent all that she had, and was nothing the better, but rather worse, 27When she had heard of Jesus, came in the crowd behind him, and touched his garment. 28For she said: If I shall touch but his garment, I shall be whole. 29And forthwith the fountain of her blood was dried up, and she felt in her body that she was healed of the evil. 30And immediately Jesus knowing in himself the virtue that had proceeded from him, turning to the multitude, said: Who hath touched my garments? 31And his disciples said to him: Thou seest the multitude thronging thee, and sayest thou who hath touched me? 32And he looked about to see her who had done this. 33But the woman fearing and trembling, knowing what was done in her, came and fell down before him, and told him all the truth. 34And he said to her: Daughter, thy faith hath made thee whole: go in peace, and be thou whole of thy disease. 35While he was yet speaking, some come from the ruler of the synagogue’s house, saying: Thy daughter is dead: why dost thou trouble the master any further? 36But Jesus having heard the word that was spoken, saith to the ruler of the synagogue: Fear not, only believe. 37And he admitted not any man to follow him, but Peter, and James, and John the brother of James. 38And they come to the house of the ruler of the synagogue; and he seeth a tumult, and people weeping and wailing much. 39And going in, he saith to them: Why make you this ado, and weep? the damsel is not dead, but sleepeth. 40And they laughed him to scorn. But he having put them all out, taketh the father and the mother of the damsel, and them that were with him, and entereth in where the damsel was lying. 41And taking the damsel by the hand, he saith to her: Talitha cumi, which is, being interpreted: Damsel (I say to thee) arise. 42And immediately the damsel rose up, and walked: and she was twelve years old: and they were astonished with a great astonishment. 43And he charged them strictly that no man should know it: and commanded that something should be given her to eat.

Step 2Each eligible tradition reads the chapter — 12 voting profiles across 3 families

Isolated AI-generated profiles that do not see one another. Genre-aware, and honest about thin material. Each reading is three layers — immediate meaning, reception, application — and every claim was checked against the source text before the vote.

Ancient Communions · The undivided-church and pre-Reformation episcopal traditions.

Catholicaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Roman Catholic tradition drawing on both Latin AND Eastern Catholic sources — and actually showing the Eastern dimension, not merely promising it: Scripture within Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium (the Catechism, the Latin Fathers, Augustine, Aquinas and the scholastics, the councils) together with the Eastern Catholic churches in communion with Rome and the Greek and Syriac Fathers they share. Sacramental and typological reading. Distinguish teaching shared across the whole Catholic communion from emphases specific to the Latin or to the Eastern Catholic churches.

Immediate meaningMark 5 presents three interconnected miracles demonstrating Jesus' sovereign power over demons, chronic disease, and death itself. The narrative moves from Gentile territory, where Jesus casts the 'Legion' of demons into a herd of swine, back to Jewish territory. The second half features an intercalation: on his way to heal the critically ill twelve-year-old daughter of Jairus, Jesus is interrupted by a woman who has suffered a hemorrhage for twelve years. Her touch of his garment elicits immediate healing. Upon reaching Jairus's house, Jesus raises the now-dead girl with an Aramaic command and orders that she be given food.

ReceptionCatholic reception heavily emphasizes the sacramental and incarnational theology present in these miracles. The physical mediation of grace is a paramount theme. The Eastern Syriac tradition, exemplified by Ephrem the Syrian's commentary, highlights how the bleeding woman's touch demonstrates Christ's divine power flowing through the material reality of his garment, providing a foundation for the theology of physical sacraments and sacramentals. Latin reception, synthesized by Thomas Aquinas, frequently traces ecclesiological typology in the intercalated miracles: the twelve-year-old girl represents the Synagogue, while the bleeding woman represents the Gentile Church which approaches Christ from behind to be healed. Furthermore, Bede the Venerable interprets Christ's command to give the raised girl something to eat as a type for the Eucharist, teaching that those raised from the spiritual death of sin require the Sacrament of the Altar for sustenance.

ApplicationThe chapter is applied liturgically and pastorally in several ways. The exorcism of the Gerasene demoniac informs the Church's understanding of spiritual warfare and the Rite of Exorcism, emphasizing Christ's absolute authority over demonic forces. The healing of the bleeding woman encourages devotion to the sacraments, sacramentals, and relics, teaching that faith expressed through physical proximity to sacred things mediates Christ's healing. Finally, the raising of Jairus's daughter is applied to the Sacrament of Penance, where the spiritually dead are restored to life by Christ's word, and then immediately directed to receive the Eucharist to sustain their renewed state of grace.

Authorities named: Ephrem the Syrian — Commentary on Tatian's Diatessaron · Bede the Venerable — Commentary on the Gospel of Mark · Thomas Aquinas — Catena Aurea

claim-level audit (4 checks)
  • Christ's divine power is mediated through physical objects, establishing a prece
  • The two healed females represent the Gentile Church and the Jewish Synagogue in
  • The command to feed the resurrected girl is a typological instruction that those
  • The narrative of raising the dead girl followed by a command to eat is applied t
Eastern Orthodoxaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Eastern Orthodox tradition: Scripture within Holy Tradition and the consensus of the Fathers (patristic consensus). Emphases on theosis, the liturgy, the Septuagint text, apophatic mystery over precise definition, and the seven Ecumenical Councils.

Immediate meaningIn its immediate narrative context, Mark 5 presents three profound demonstrations of Jesus' authority over forces that diminish or destroy human life: the demonic realm, chronic impurity/disease, and death itself. Jesus crosses into Gentile territory and exorcises a 'Legion' of demons from a man living among the tombs, permitting the spirits to enter a herd of pigs which then perish in the sea. Upon returning, He is interrupted on His way to heal the dying daughter of Jairus, a synagogue ruler, by a woman with a twelve-year hemorrhage. The woman is healed immediately by touching His garment in faith. After confirming her healing, Jesus proceeds to Jairus's house, ignores the mourners' ridicule, and raises the young girl from the dead, instructing them to give her food to prove the physical reality of her restoration.

ReceptionEastern Orthodox reception of Mark 5 reads these miracles profoundly through the lenses of the Incarnation, the theology of uncreated energies, and the material mediation of grace. The healing of the woman with the issue of blood (vv. 25-34) is a central text for Orthodox sacramental theology. The 'power' (dynamis) that Jesus perceives going out from Him (v. 30) is interpreted by theologians like Gregory Palamas as the uncreated divine energy, which is communicated to creation through the deified physical flesh of the incarnate Christ. Furthermore, because this divine energy healed the woman through the medium of His physical clothes, John of Damascus and later Byzantine defenders of icons cite this passage as definitive proof that matter is not inherently evil and can become a vehicle for divine grace, establishing the biblical foundation for the veneration of relics and holy objects. In the account of the Gerasene demoniac (vv. 1-20), patristic consensus, articulated prominently by John Chrysostom in his treatment of the synoptic accounts, points out that the demons' begging for permission to enter the swine demonstrates their total lack of independent authority. They cannot so much as touch animals without Christ's permissive will, emphasizing God's absolute sovereignty and the ultimate powerlessness of the demonic. The raising of Jairus's daughter (vv. 35-43) establishes the Orthodox eschatological view of death as a mere 'sleep' (koimesis) from which Christ will awaken humanity, prefiguring the general resurrection.

ApplicationIn Orthodox application, this chapter profoundly informs the sacramental and ascetical life of the Church. The woman's touch of Christ's garment is applied directly to the Mysteries (Sacraments), particularly the Eucharist and Holy Unction, where believers physically touch and consume the life-giving body and blood of Christ for the healing of soul and body. Ascetically, the demoniac dwelling in the tombs represents the human nous (the eye of the soul) darkened by passions and spiritual death; his restoration to his 'right mind' sitting at the feet of Jesus is the goal of Orthodox psychotherapy and hesychastic prayer. Liturgically, the raising of Jairus's daughter reinforces the language used in Orthodox memorial services (Panikhida), where the departed are consistently referred to as 'those who have fallen asleep,' confessing faith in the coming resurrection.

Authorities named: Gregory Palamas — Triads in Defense of the Holy Hesychasts · John of Damascus — An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith · John Chrysostom — Homilies on Matthew

claim-level audit (6 checks)
  • Jesus demonstrated authority over the demonic realm, chronic disease, and death
  • The power that left Jesus to heal the woman is understood as God's uncreated div
  • The healing through Christ's clothing establishes the theological premise that p
  • The demons' request to enter the swine shows that the demonic realm is powerless
  • The passage models the Orthodox approach to the Mysteries (Sacraments), where ph
  • The narrative of the demoniac is read ascetically as the healing of the passion-
Oriental Orthodoxaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Oriental Orthodox tradition (Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac): Scripture within the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils and the miaphysite Fathers (Athanasius, Cyril of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch). Deeply liturgical, ascetic, and typological reading; some of these churches hold wider canons.

Immediate meaningMark 5 comprises three interlocking miracle narratives that demonstrate Jesus' absolute authority over demonic subjugation, chronic illness, and death. The chapter opens with the exorcism of the Gerasene demoniac, whose 'Legion' of unclean spirits is sent into a herd of swine. Following this, the text employs an intercalation (a narrative 'sandwich'): while Jesus is on his way to heal the dying daughter of Jairus, a synagogue ruler, a woman who has suffered from a hemorrhage for twelve years touches his garment and is immediately healed. Jesus perceives power going out from him and affirms her faith. He then proceeds to Jairus's house, ignores the mourners' ridicule, takes the deceased girl by the hand, and raises her back to life with a command.

ReceptionThe Oriental Orthodox tradition reads this chapter through a highly developed miaphysite Christological lens. For the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils, the miracles of Mark 5 are paramount demonstrations of the unified nature of the Incarnate Word. The healing power that goes out from Jesus (verse 30) and His taking the dead girl by the hand (verse 41) are not viewed as a divine nature acting independently of a human nature; rather, they are the single divine-human activity of the one Christ. Theologians like Severus of Antioch point to these physical acts of healing as proof of the 'life-giving flesh' (zoopoios sarx). The body of Christ itself radiates divine power because it is perfectly united with the Word. Furthermore, the Syriac tradition, exemplified by Ephrem the Syrian, extensively contrasts the faith of the woman with the hemorrhage against the physical pressing of the crowd. The crowd presses against His humanity without spiritual comprehension, but the woman's faith directly encounters the life-giving divine power united to His flesh.

ApplicationLiturgically and sacramentally, the physical mediations of healing in this chapter—the touch of a garment and the grasping of a hand—undergird the Oriental Orthodox reliance on material elements (water, oil, the Eucharistic elements) to transmit divine grace. The healing of the woman is frequently invoked in the Coptic and Syriac rites for the Unction of the Sick, presenting Christ as the supreme Physician who heals without medicine. Ascetically, the Gerasene demoniac is read as a profound typological figure of the human soul entirely subjugated by the passions, dwelling in the 'tombs' of spiritual death. His restoration to being 'clothed and in his right mind' represents the ascetic goal of inner unification and hesychia (stillness) achieved solely through the authoritative command of Christ. The healed demoniac's subsequent commission to proclaim Christ in the Decapolis is seen as the natural resulting vocation of a soul liberated from demonic influence.

Authorities named: Severus of Antioch — Cathedral Homilies · Ephrem the Syrian — Commentary on the Diatessaron

claim-level audit (4 checks)
  • The raising of Jairus's daughter by the hand demonstrates that Christ's human fl
  • Healing power went out from Christ not merely as a physical emanation, but was a
  • The Gerasene demoniac serves as an ascetic type for the soul bound by passions a
  • Christ's physical mediations of healing provide a theological basis for the Chur

Reformation Traditions · The magisterial churches of the sixteenth-century Reformation.

Anglican / Episcopalaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Anglican tradition (including the Episcopal Church): Scripture read with tradition and reason (Hooker); the Book of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles; a comprehensiveness spanning evangelical, anglo-catholic, and broad/progressive readings — name that spectrum where the passage has been read across it.

Immediate meaningIn this chapter, Jesus demonstrates supreme authority over three destructive forces that isolate human beings from their communities: demonic possession in a Gentile territory, chronic ritual impurity, and death. The narrative utilizes an intercalated (sandwiched) structure to link the healing of the bleeding woman with the raising of Jairus's daughter, emphasizing that physical touch, previously associated with the transmission of impurity, becomes the conduit for Christ's restoring power. Faith is presented as the vital catalyst for these life-giving encounters.

ReceptionThe chapter is read across the comprehensive spectrum of Anglicanism, with different wings highlighting distinct theological facets. The Evangelical tradition, typified by J. C. Ryle, places heavy emphasis on the contrast between the multitude that merely 'thronged' Jesus and the woman who touched him with saving faith, using this to distinguish outward religious observance from inward, active trust. Conversely, the Anglo-Catholic tradition views the transmission of 'virtue' or power through Jesus' garments as profoundly incarnational, pointing to it as a scriptural defense for sacramental theology—the belief that God uses material elements to mediate spiritual grace. In the Broad and Progressive traditions, scholars like Rowan Williams draw attention to the socio-political and psychological dimensions of the text. 'Legion' is recognized as a term of imperial military occupation, framing the exorcism as a liberation from systemic oppression, while all three miracles are celebrated for restoring marginalized individuals to their families, communities, and social agency.

ApplicationAnglican pastoral theology relies heavily on this chapter to ground its healing ministries. The physical mediation of Christ's healing power informs the rites of the Ministration to the Sick in the Book of Common Prayer, particularly the laying on of hands and unction. Additionally, Jesus' command to the healed demoniac to 'go home to thy friends' is frequently utilized to encourage lay evangelism, validating the testimony of ordinary believers in their everyday domestic spheres.

Authorities named: J. C. Ryle — Expository Thoughts on Mark · Rowan Williams — Meeting God in Mark · The Episcopal Church — The Book of Common Prayer (1979)

claim-level audit (5 checks)
  • The woman's touch is contrasted with the pressing crowd to distinguish between s
  • The flow of power from Jesus' clothing is interpreted as an incarnational endors
  • The name 'Legion' is understood to carry imperial overtones, framing the exorcis
  • The passage provides the biblical foundation for Anglican liturgies of healing,
  • The dismissal of the healed demoniac to his home is applied as a model for lay e
Lutheranaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Lutheran tradition (the Book of Concord): the law–gospel distinction, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura held with the ecumenical creeds, the theology of the cross, and sacramental realism.

Immediate meaningMark 5 recounts three miracles demonstrating Jesus' absolute authority over the forces that destroy human life: the demonic, chronic disease, and death. In Gentile territory, Jesus frees a man possessed by a 'Legion' of demons, sending the spirits into a herd of swine, which provokes fear and rejection from the locals. Returning across the sea, Jesus is urgently summoned by Jairus to heal his dying daughter. En route, a woman suffering from a twelve-year hemorrhage—rendering her perpetually unclean and financially ruined—touches Jesus' garment in secret and is instantly healed. Jesus halts to publicly confirm her faith. While delayed, Jairus receives word his daughter has died. Jesus dismisses the tragedy as mere sleep, faces the mockery of the mourners, and raises the girl to life with a simple command.

ReceptionThe Lutheran tradition reads this chapter as a profound illustration of Christology, justification by faith, and the distinction between law and gospel. The helplessness of the demoniac, the bleeding woman, and the dead girl typifies the human condition under the Law: completely bound by Satan, incurable by human effort, and spiritually dead. Christ enters this condition as the pure Gospel, bringing deliverance from the outside through His efficacious Word. The narrative of the bleeding woman is heavily utilized in Lutheran Christology to defend sacramental realism and the communication of attributes (communicatio idiomatum). Theologians like Martin Chemnitz point to Jesus sensing 'power proceeding from him' (v. 30) when the woman touched His clothes as proof that Christ's human nature is completely infused with divine, life-giving majesty (finitum capax infiniti). Just as divine power was mediated physically through His body and garment, Lutheran dogmatics assert that Christ's body and blood truly mediate forgiveness and life in the Eucharist. Furthermore, the chapter serves as a central locus for sola fide. Jesus' declarations, 'Thy faith hath made thee whole' (v. 34) and 'Fear not, only believe' (v. 36), are interpreted as defining the nature of justifying faith. Faith is not a meritorious work, but a receptive organ that clings solely to Christ's promise, even when the evidence of the senses and human reason (the doctors' failure, the daughter's apparent death, the mocking crowd) contradict it.

ApplicationLutheran application emphasizes pastoral care in the face of suffering and death. When confronted with physical death or despair, Christians are taught to model Jairus and the bleeding woman by clinging strictly to the external Word of Christ ('only believe') rather than their own feelings or dire circumstances. The declaration that the girl 'is not dead, but sleepeth' (v. 39) is frequently used in Lutheran funeral preaching to comfort mourners that, in Christ, death has been reduced to a temporary slumber from which the believer will be easily awakened. Additionally, the sacraments are presented to the laity as the contemporary 'hem of His garment'—tangible, physical means through which they can touch Christ and receive His healing power for the forgiveness of sins.

Authorities named: Martin Chemnitz — The Two Natures in Christ · Martin Luther — Church Postil

claim-level audit (4 checks)
  • The human inability to cure the woman's hemorrhage or bind the demoniac illustra
  • The physical transmission of power through Jesus' garment is evidence that His h
  • Jesus' statements 'your faith has made you well' and 'only believe' prove that f
  • Death for the believer is transformed by Christ's word into a mere sleep, from w
Reformed / Presbyterianaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Reformed tradition (Calvin; the Westminster Standards; the Heidelberg and Belgic confessions): the sovereignty of God and covenant theology, a redemptive-historical reading of Scripture, and the regulative principle.

Immediate meaningMark 5 narrates three powerful demonstrations of Jesus's authority over forces that diminish and destroy human life. First, in the Gentile region of the Gerasenes, Jesus encounters a man possessed by a 'Legion' of demons. He exercises absolute command over the spirits, granting their request to enter a herd of pigs, which then rush into the sea. Returning across the lake, Jesus is implored by Jairus, a synagogue ruler, to heal his dying daughter. While Jesus is on the way, a woman who has suffered from chronic bleeding for twelve years touches His garment and is instantly healed. Jesus stops to elicit her public confession. During this delay, Jairus's daughter dies, but Jesus proceeds to the house and raises the girl back to life.

ReceptionReformed theology reads Mark 5 through the distinct lenses of God's absolute sovereignty and the redemptive-historical mission of the Mediator to reverse the curse of the Fall. In his 'Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists', John Calvin utilizes the account of the Gerasene demoniac to articulate the Reformed doctrine of providence regarding evil. Calvin argues that the demons' plea to enter the swine (vv. 12-13) decisively proves that Satan and his agents are completely bridled by God's sovereign decree; they can do absolutely nothing without Christ's explicit permission. The subsequent destruction of the pigs highlights the inherently destructive malice of Satan, which God restrains for the protection of humanity. In interpreting the healing of the bleeding woman, the Reformed tradition focuses on the nature of saving faith. Calvin notes that her belief that physical contact with Christ's garment was necessary (v. 28) was mixed with a degree of superstition or theological error. However, because her faith was fundamentally directed toward the true Redeemer, Christ graciously accommodated her weakness, honoring her faith and correcting her understanding by attributing the healing to her trust in Him (v. 34). Redemptive-historically, commentators like William Hendriksen read these three miracles not merely as isolated acts of compassion, but as eschatological signs: Christ the Covenant King is actively inaugurating His kingdom by comprehensively subduing demonic tyranny, incurable disease, and death itself.

ApplicationPastorally, the Reformed tradition draws deep comfort from this chapter regarding the security of the believer. Because the forces of hell cannot so much as enter a herd of pigs without the sovereign permission of Christ, believers are assured that Satan cannot harm them outside of God's overarching providence. The story of the bleeding woman is frequently applied to comfort Christians burdened by weak or imperfect faith; it teaches that it is the object of faith (Christ), rather than the flawless execution of that faith, that secures grace. Finally, the healed demoniac's commission (v. 19) is applied as a paradigm for ordinary Christian witness, calling believers to testify to their communities about the sovereign mercy the Lord has shown them.

Authorities named: John Calvin — Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists · John Calvin — Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists · William Hendriksen — Exposition of the Gospel According to Mark

claim-level audit (6 checks)
  • The demons' request to enter the pigs demonstrates that demonic forces are subje
  • The bleeding woman's belief that she needed to touch Jesus's garment contained t
  • The chapter functions redemptive-historically to display Christ's systematic rev
  • Believers are comforted that demonic forces cannot act against them without God'
  • Christians are encouraged that weak or imperfect faith is acceptable to Christ a
  • The delivered demoniac serves as a model for believers to declare God's merciful

Free-Church & Revival Traditions · Believers'-church, revival, and restorationist movements.

Baptistaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Baptist tradition (e.g. the 1689 Second London Confession, the Baptist Faith & Message — note the range): believers' baptism, congregational polity, liberty of conscience, a memorial reading of the ordinances, and strong emphasis on personal conversion and biblical authority.

Immediate meaningThe chapter is a narrative recording three interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus's absolute authority over the most terrifying human afflictions: demonic subjugation, incurable chronic illness, and death itself. Jesus casts a legion of demons out of a Gerasene man into a herd of swine, heals a woman with a twelve-year issue of blood who touches his garment in a crowd, and raises the twelve-year-old daughter of Jairus, a synagogue ruler, from the dead. In each instance, fear and despair are countered by Jesus's sovereign word and the necessity of faith.

ReceptionThe Baptist tradition reads this chapter predominantly through the lens of personal conversion and unmediated faith. Rather than viewing the woman's touch of Christ's garment as evidence of sacramental or mediated grace, Baptist expositors sharply distinguish between the crowd that merely pressed against Jesus physically and the woman who touched Him with personal, active faith. John Gill famously argued that her faith, not the fabric, was the instrument of her healing, prefiguring the doctrine of justification by faith alone. Similarly, the healing of the Gerasene demoniac is widely interpreted as a paradigm of radical regeneration. The man's transition from uncontrollable depravity to sitting 'clothed, and in his right mind' is heralded as the hallmark of the new birth. Furthermore, Jesus's refusal to let the healed man accompany Him in the boat, instead commanding him to 'go home to thy friends, and tell them,' is deeply ingrained in Baptist theology as the foundation for personal evangelism and the believer's testimony. Charles Spurgeon frequently preached this passage to emphasize that every converted individual, regardless of theological training, possesses an immediate duty and capacity to declare the Gospel.

ApplicationBaptists frequently apply this chapter in evangelistic preaching, urging listeners to move beyond mere proximity to the church (the 'thronging crowd') and to exercise a personal, saving faith in Christ (the 'touch'). The Gerasene demoniac's commission is routinely used to train congregations in personal evangelism, emphasizing that sharing one's own conversion story—what great things the Lord has done—is the most fundamental form of missionary work. Pastors also use Jesus's words to Jairus, 'only believe,' to comfort believers facing seemingly impossible grief or terminal circumstances.

Authorities named: John Gill — Exposition of the New Testament · Charles Spurgeon — Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit

claim-level audit (5 checks)
  • Jesus possesses ultimate, sovereign authority over spiritual forces, chronic phy
  • The physical restoration of the demoniac represents the spiritual reality of rad
  • Healing and salvation are secured through unmediated, personal faith rather than
  • Every believer has a mandate to share their personal testimony of Christ's mercy
  • In the face of extreme tragedy or apparent finality, believers are called to per
Methodist / Wesleyan / Holinessaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Wesleyan-Holiness tradition: prevenient grace and free response, sanctification and entire sanctification / Christian perfection, the Wesleyan quadrilateral (Scripture primary, with tradition, reason, and experience), and warm-hearted practical piety.

Immediate meaningIn its immediate narrative context, Mark 5 presents a triptych of Jesus' sovereign authority over forces that overwhelm human capacity: the chaotic evil of the demonic Legion in Gentile territory, a chronic flow of blood causing permanent ritual impurity, and the ultimate boundary of death in Jairus's daughter. The chapter highlights the crossing of social and religious boundaries, the necessity of active faith in the face of despair, and the physical transmission of divine power ('virtue') that restores individuals to their communities.

ReceptionThe Wesleyan-Holiness tradition has deeply internalized Mark 5 as a multi-layered illustration of soteriology, particularly regarding justification, the restoration of the imago Dei, and sanctification. John Wesley and early Methodist commentators like Adam Clarke read the Gerasene demoniac's restoration to his 'right mind' (v. 15) as a profound metaphor for the spiritual sanity that accompanies justifying grace, contrasting it with the inherent madness and self-destruction of a life governed by sin. Furthermore, the woman with the issue of blood is viewed through the lens of prevenient grace and human response: her healing illustrates the synergy of faith. While she must exercise the volition to reach out (vv. 27-28), it is explicitly Christ's power or 'virtue' (v. 30) that affects the cure. In the later Holiness movement, the woman's twelve-year suffering and failure of all other physicians (v. 26) was often typologically applied to the believer's frustrating struggle with inbred sin, which cannot be cured by human effort but only by an immediate, faith-filled encounter with Christ that brings entire sanctification.

ApplicationMethodist practical piety heavily emphasizes Jesus' command to the delivered demoniac: 'Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee' (v. 19). This serves as a foundational biblical mandate for the practice of personal testimony, which was the lifeblood of early Methodist class meetings and band societies. Believers are instructed that experiencing God's grace carries a corresponding duty to declare it, starting within their own households. Additionally, Jesus' word to Jairus, 'Fear not, only believe' (v. 36), is frequently invoked in Wesleyan pastoral care as an exhortation to maintain faith when sensory evidence and circumstances dictate despair.

Authorities named: John Wesley — Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament · Adam Clarke — Commentary on the Bible

claim-level audit (4 checks)
  • The deliverance of the demoniac and his subsequent state of sitting 'in his righ
  • Jesus' command to the delivered man establishes a mandate for believers to decla
  • The healing of the woman with the issue of blood demonstrates that Christ's powe
  • Jesus' instruction to Jairus models the persistence of faith required of believe
Anabaptist / Mennoniteaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Anabaptist tradition (Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite): a Jesus-centered reading with the Sermon on the Mount as normative, believers' baptism, nonviolence and nonresistance, simple living, communal discernment, and the church as a visible community distinct from worldly power.

Immediate meaningIn Mark 5, the narrative follows Jesus demonstrating authority over three formidable forces: demons, chronic illness, and death. Crossing into Gentile territory, Jesus encounters a violently possessed man who lives among the tombs, breaking the chains meant to restrain him. The demons identify themselves as 'Legion' and beg to be sent into a herd of swine, which subsequently rushes into the sea and drowns. The local people, terrified by the economic loss and the dramatic change in the now-peaceful man, ask Jesus to leave. Back in Jewish territory, Jesus is approached by Jairus to heal his dying daughter. En route, a woman suffering from a hemorrhage for twelve years touches Jesus' garment and is instantly healed; Jesus commends her faith. Upon arriving at Jairus's house, Jesus dismisses the mocking mourners and raises the child from the dead.

ReceptionThe Anabaptist tradition reads this chapter with a strong focus on Jesus' nonviolent confrontation with oppressive 'powers and principalities.' Mennonite biblical scholarship frequently interprets the Gerasene demoniac episode as both a spiritual exorcism and a socio-political subversion. Willard Swartley emphasizes the heavily militarized language in the text, noting that 'Legion' directly invokes the Roman occupying army. The man's self-mutilation and broken chains are seen as the trauma and futility of living under—and trying to violently resist—empire. Jesus does not use greater violence to subdue the man; rather, he liberates him with a peaceful, authoritative word. The drowning of the swine (an animal ritually unclean to Jews and a known mascot for the Roman Tenth Fretensis Legion) evokes the Exodus narrative of Pharaoh's armies drowning in the sea, framing Jesus as inaugurating a new, nonviolent liberation. Furthermore, the Gerasenes' request for Jesus to leave demonstrates how societies often prefer familiar, managed violence and economic stability over the disruptive, transformative peace of the Kingdom of God. In the subsequent healings, Anabaptist readers highlight Jesus' willingness to cross strict religious purity boundaries (touching a bleeding woman and a corpse) to prioritize human restoration over legalism.

ApplicationAnabaptist communities apply this chapter to their commitments to peacemaking, nonresistance, and holistic witness. The restored demoniac—found 'sitting, clothed, and in his right mind' (v. 15)—is viewed as the archetypal picture of the peaceable kingdom, contrasting sharply with the world's failed attempts to control violence with chains and fetters (v. 4). The church is challenged to examine where it might resemble the fearful townspeople, prioritizing economic security (the pigs) over the liberation of the marginalized. Additionally, Jesus' instruction to the healed man to remain and tell his community what the Lord has done (v. 19) serves as a foundational model for Anabaptist evangelism: witnessing to God's restorative mercy through transformed, nonviolent living within local communities. The healing of the bleeding woman is applied as a call for the church to extend visible, boundary-crossing compassion to those socially isolated by medical or structural vulnerabilities.

Authorities named: Willard M. Swartley — Mark: The Way for All Nations (Believers Church Bible Commentary) · Willard M. Swartley — Mark: The Way for All Nations (Believers Church Bible Commentary)

claim-level audit (5 checks)
  • The demonic name 'Legion' is interpreted as a direct reference to the occupying
  • The failure of chains and fetters to tame the man contrasts with Jesus' ability
  • The destruction of the swine and the subsequent fear of the locals reveals a hum
  • Jesus commissioning the healed man to return home is treated as a paradigm for w
  • Jesus' healings of the bleeding woman and Jairus's daughter demonstrate a kingdo
Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal tradition (Assemblies of God, Church of God, and kindred bodies): the present continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine healing, and expectancy of God's present action, read within Nicene Trinitarian faith. Do NOT attribute Word-of-Faith / prosperity or later neo-charismatic distinctives to classical Pentecostalism generally.

Immediate meaningIn this narrative chapter, Jesus crosses the Sea of Galilee into Gentile territory and encounters a severely demonized man. Jesus demonstrates absolute authority over a 'Legion' of unclean spirits, casting them into a herd of swine and restoring the man to his right mind (verses 1-20). Returning to the Jewish side, Jesus is implored by a synagogue ruler, Jairus, to heal his dying daughter (verses 21-24). En route, a woman who had suffered from a chronic hemorrhage for twelve years touches His garment in faith, instantly drawing healing power from Him (verses 25-34). Despite receiving news that Jairus's daughter has died, Jesus commands the father to 'only believe' and proceeds to raise the girl from the dead (verses 35-43).

ReceptionClassical Trinitarian Pentecostalism receives Mark 5 as a definitive revelation of Christ's total victory over demonic oppression, chronic disease, and death. Against theological liberalism, the tradition reads the Gerasene demoniac narrative as establishing the literal, destructive reality of demonic forces and Jesus' supreme, uncontested authority to subjugate them (verses 1-13). The healing of the woman with the issue of blood serves as a central paradigm for the Pentecostal theology of divine healing. Her healing underscores that 'virtue' (Greek *dunamis*, often translated as power) is a tangible reality that responds directly to active, expectant faith (verses 27-30). Figures such as Smith Wigglesworth (*Ever Increasing Faith*) utilized this pericope to argue that faith acts as a necessary catalyst, actively reaching out to draw physical healing from Christ (verse 34). Furthermore, Jesus' word to Jairus, 'Fear not, only believe' (verse 36), is a hallmark text for the Pentecostal understanding of faith, teaching that divine promises and Christ's power override empirical, negative natural evidence (verse 35).

ApplicationPentecostals apply this chapter heavily in the praxis of divine healing and deliverance. The woman's determination to touch Jesus' garment is frequently invoked in preaching and healing lines, exhorting believers to 'press in' and touch the Lord by faith, expecting a present-day transfer of healing power. The mandate to 'only believe' (verse 36) functions as a ubiquitous pastoral encouragement to maintain faith during severe crises or negative medical reports. In deliverance ministry, the Gerasene narrative is applied to demonstrate that no degree of spiritual bondage is beyond the liberating power of Jesus, and that demons must immediately yield to His command.

Authorities named: Smith Wigglesworth — Ever Increasing Faith

claim-level audit (3 checks)
  • Jesus' encounter with the Gerasene demoniac establishes the literal reality of d
  • The woman with the issue of blood demonstrates that active, expectant faith draw
  • Jesus' command to Jairus to 'only believe' establishes a pastoral and theologica
Seventh-day Adventistaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Seventh-day Adventist tradition: the seventh-day Sabbath, the great-controversy theme, conditional immortality, sanctuary theology, and a historicist reading of prophecy.

Immediate meaningThe narrative recounts three distinct but interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus' supreme authority over forces that diminish or destroy human life: spiritual bondage, chronic illness, and death. He frees a Gadarene man possessed by a legion of demons, sending them into a herd of swine; he heals a woman who had suffered from a hemorrhage for twelve years after she touches his garment; and he raises the twelve-year-old daughter of Jairus, a synagogue ruler, from the dead.

ReceptionSeventh-day Adventist reception of Mark 5 heavily engages two of the tradition's defining theological lenses: the great-controversy theme and conditional immortality. The account of the Gadarene demoniac is widely read as a microcosm of the cosmic conflict. Ellen G. White emphasized that the demoniac's self-mutilation and madness represent Satan's ultimate design to degrade and destroy humanity, while the man sitting 'clothed, and in his right mind' (Mark 5:15) demonstrates Christ's mission to restore the divine image in humanity. The loss of the swine is seen as Satan's tactic to incite the townspeople to reject Jesus. Furthermore, the resurrection of Jairus's daughter is a primary text for the Adventist understanding of the state of the dead. Jesus' declaration, 'the damsel is not dead, but sleepeth' (Mark 5:39), is taken literally by the tradition to support conditional immortality (often termed 'soul sleep'). Adventists argue this verse proves that death is an unconscious state of rest, rather than the separation of an immortal soul from the body. The deceased is entirely unconscious, 'sleeping' until awakened by the life-giving command of Christ (Mark 5:41).

ApplicationAdventists apply this chapter practically in areas of evangelism, faith, and grief. The formerly possessed man, who is instructed to 'Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee' (Mark 5:19), is held up as a model for lay evangelism; believers are taught that personal testimony of Christ's restorative power is often the most effective witness. The woman with the issue of blood serves as a homiletic illustration of the difference between casual association with the church (the pressing crowd) and active, saving faith (the intentional touch). Finally, the doctrine of soul sleep drawn from verse 39 is applied pastorally to comfort grieving families, assuring them that their dead loved ones are resting peacefully and unconsciously until the resurrection morning.

Authorities named: Ellen G. White — The Desire of Ages · Ministerial Association of the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists — Seventh-day Adventists Believe

claim-level audit (4 checks)
  • The narrative of the demoniac is viewed as a vivid illustration of the great-con
  • Jesus' description of the dead girl as sleeping is interpreted as definitive pro
  • Jesus' command to the healed demoniac to share his story at home serves as a fou
  • The woman's touch of Jesus' garment is applied to teach the necessity of active,
Restorationist / Churches of Christaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Restoration Movement tradition (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches — formally non-creedal): restore New Testament Christianity, 'speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent,' reading by direct command, apostolic example, and necessary inference; baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; the weekly Lord's Supper.

Immediate meaningIn Mark 5, Jesus demonstrates absolute authority over the spiritual realm, physical disease, and death through three distinct miracles. He exorcises a legion of demons from a man in the Gerasene region, sending the spirits into a herd of pigs which then perish in the sea. After being asked to leave the region by the frightened locals, Jesus crosses back over the sea. He is approached by Jairus, a synagogue ruler, whose daughter is dying. While en route to Jairus's house, a woman who has suffered from a bleeding condition for twelve years touches his garment in faith and is instantly healed. Despite receiving news that Jairus's daughter has died, Jesus proceeds to the home, dismisses the mourners, and raises the girl back to life.

ReceptionThe Restoration Movement, particularly Churches of Christ, historically approaches Mark 5 through an evidentialist hermeneutic. Commentators in this tradition read these miracles as literal, historical facts recorded specifically to produce rational faith in Jesus as the Son of God. J.W. McGarvey and P.Y. Pendleton emphasize the sheer, undeniable power Jesus exercises over all categories of human suffering and supernatural oppression, viewing the text as a foundational apologetic defense of Christ's divinity. Furthermore, the mechanics of faith are highly scrutinized in this chapter. C.E.W. Dorris notes that the woman with the issue of blood possessed a faith that drove her to physical action (touching the garment); her faith was not merely intellectual ascent but was 'active' and 'obedient,' a recurring thematic requirement for salvation in Restorationist theology. B.W. Johnson highlights the instruction given to the healed demoniac (verses 19-20) as a pivotal moment, noting it as an early, localized commission to proclaim God's grace in the Gentile region of the Decapolis, contrasting the man's eager obedience with the fearful rejection of his townsfolk.

ApplicationIn Churches of Christ, Mark 5 is frequently preached to illustrate the destructive nature of sin (mirrored by the demoniac's self-harm and isolation) and the total restorative power of Jesus. The chapter is applied as a prime example of the necessity of an active, seeking faith. The woman who pressed through the crowd to touch Jesus is held up as a model for the sinner who must actively respond to the gospel call rather than waiting passively. Additionally, Jesus' command to Jairus, 'only believe' (verse 36), is applied to encourage believers facing insurmountable grief or fear, with the understanding that such belief inherently involves continued obedience and trust in Christ's word. The healed demoniac's return to his friends to report the Lord's mercy is heavily utilized as a straightforward pattern for personal evangelism.

Authorities named: J.W. McGarvey and P.Y. Pendleton — The Fourfold Gospel · C.E.W. Dorris — A Commentary on the Gospel According to Mark · B.W. Johnson — The People's New Testament

claim-level audit (5 checks)
  • Jesus demonstrates absolute authority over supernatural forces, chronic physical
  • The miracles provide historical, factual evidence intended to serve as apologeti
  • The woman's physical act of touching Jesus' garment demonstrates that biblical f
  • The healed demoniac's obedience in telling his friends about Jesus models the na
  • Believers are exhorted to overcome paralyzing fear by maintaining a steadfast, a

Step 3Non-voting panels and comparative appendix

These inform the notes and the rendering, and are reported here, but they are never counted in the vote.

Academic textual-historical analysisaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Academic textual-historical analysis: philology and the original-language text, textual criticism, ancient Near Eastern (and, for the NT, Greco-Roman) context, literary genre and form, composition and dating debates, and reception history. Describe scholarly positions and their evidence without confessional commitment. This panel informs the textual notes and the rendering; it is never a church vote.

Immediate meaning1. IMMEDIATE MEANING: Academic analysis of Mark 5 identifies three major episodes structured as one independent pericope followed by an intercalation, or 'Markan sandwich.' The first narrative (vv. 1-20) details the healing of the demoniac in the Decapolis region. Scholars point out a significant textual and geographical problem in verse 1: the best early manuscripts read 'Gerasenes' (Gerasa), which is located over thirty miles southeast of the Sea of Galilee, making a steep plunge into the sea impossible. Later scribes attempted to correct this to 'Gadarenes' (closer) or 'Gergesenes' (on the shore). The use of the Latin loanword 'Legion' (v. 9) carries heavy military and political connotations, likely reflecting the Roman occupation. The second section (vv. 21-43) interleaves the healing of a woman with a hemorrhage (vv. 25-34) inside the raising of Jairus's daughter (vv. 21-24, 35-43). The narrative links the two women through the number twelve (the duration of the woman's bleeding in v. 25 and the age of the girl in v. 42), the theme of faith, and the issue of ritual impurity regarding both continuous menstrual bleeding and touching a corpse. Philologically, the retention of the transliterated Aramaic phrase 'Talitha cumi' (v. 41) suggests the author utilized early Palestinian traditions while translating them for a Greek-speaking audience.

Reception2. RECEPTION: Within historical-critical and literary reception, Mark 5 is frequently analyzed to deduce the compositional techniques of the Gospel's author and the socio-political environment of early Christianity. Post-colonial scholars often read the Gerasene demoniac episode as an anti-imperial political allegory. They note that the Legio X Fretensis, the Roman legion that occupied Jerusalem and the surrounding region, used a wild boar as one of its primary emblems; thus, Jesus casting a 'Legion' into a herd of swine that is then drowned in the sea is interpreted as a subversive, veiled wish for the expulsion of Roman occupiers. Redaction critics examine how Matthew and Luke relied on this chapter, noting that Matthew heavily compresses the narrative, doubles the demoniacs, and alters Mark's rough Greek style, demonstrating Markan priority. Feminist and socio-historical critics analyze the intercalation of the bleeding woman and Jairus's daughter to highlight how the Markan Jesus systematically dismantles ancient purity boundaries (as outlined in Levitical law) that marginalized women. Textual critics use the geographical anomalies in the opening verse as a primary example of how early transmission history involved scribal attempts to harmonize or 'correct' the author's lack of familiarity with Palestinian topography.

Application3. APPLICATION: Academically, this chapter is applied in New Testament curricula as a textbook paradigm for teaching the literary technique of intercalation (the 'Markan sandwich'), for demonstrating the methods of textual criticism regarding geographical variants, and for exploring how first-century writers used apocalyptic and miracle forms to critique socio-political realities like the Roman occupation.

Authorities named: Bruce M. Metzger — A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament · Ched Myers — Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark's Story of Jesus · James R. Edwards — Markan Sandwiches: The Significance of Interpolations in Markan Narratives (Novum Testamentum) · Marla J. Selvidge — Woman, Cult, and Miracle Recital: A Redactional Critical Investigation on Mark 5:24-34

claim-level audit (6 checks)
  • Early manuscripts read 'Gerasenes' in verse 1, which presents a geographical err
  • The term 'Legion' uses a Latin loanword that carries military connotations indic
  • The text employs an intercalation structure, inserting the story of the bleeding
  • The two healing stories are connected by the number twelve, appearing as the dur
  • The inclusion of the phrase 'Talitha cumi' demonstrates the retention of an Aram
  • Post-colonial analysis views the drowning of the pigs as a subversive anti-imper
Jewish interpretationthin materialaudit ✓

Lens given to the model: Jewish interpretation of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible books only; do not treat the New Testament as Scripture, and address it only historically if at all). Distinguish rabbinic (Talmud, Midrash), medieval (Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and the classical mefarshim), and modern (including critical and denominational) voices rather than presenting one uniform Jewish position. This panel informs, and is reported, but never a Christian church vote.

Immediate meaningAs Mark 5 is part of the New Testament, it is not recognized as Scripture in Judaism. From a historical and academic perspective, modern Jewish scholars analyze this chapter to illuminate its first-century Galilean Jewish context. The narratives feature prominent Jewish purity concerns, including contact with tombs (corpse impurity), swine, severe, chronic menstrual bleeding (niddah), and a dead body. Academic readers note that Jesus' actions in these healings—such as being touched by the hemorrhaging woman or holding the dead girl's hand—are often framed by later commentators as rejections of Jewish law, whereas Jewish scholars emphasize that the act of healing itself naturally resolves the source of the ritual impurity without inherently abrogating the Torah.

ReceptionThere is no canonical or theological reception of this text within rabbinic, medieval, or modern religious Judaism, as it falls entirely outside the Tanakh. In modern historical scholarship, however, Jewish commentators evaluate the Gospel's depiction of miracle working to understand first-century Judaism. Scholars compare Jesus' authoritative commands, notably the preserved Aramaic phrase 'Talitha cumi,' to the traditions of charismatic Galilean holy men (Hasidim) such as Hanina ben Dosa or Honi the Circle-Drawer. Furthermore, the narrative of the Gerasene demoniac is frequently read by Jewish historians as containing political subtext against the occupying Roman military, noting the explicit use of the Latin loanword 'Legion' and the destruction of the swine.

ApplicationJudaism does not apply, preach, or pray this text. It functions solely as an object of historical inquiry regarding second-temple Judaism and the historical development of early Christianity.

Authorities named: Amy-Jill Levine — The Jewish Annotated New Testament · Geza Vermes — Jesus the Jew

claim-level audit (4 checks)
  • The chapter is not canonical in Judaism and is approached solely as a historical
  • The narratives involving tombs, a hemorrhaging woman, and a corpse are deeply em
  • The use of the name 'Legion' for the demons cast into a herd of swine is underst
  • The preserved Aramaic phrase 'Talitha cumi' parallels the healing practices of G
Comparative appendix — outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster (Latter-day Saint, Jehovah's Witnesses)
Latter-day Saint

Lens given to the model: Latter-day Saint reading (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints): the Bible read alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, with living prophets and continuing revelation, and the Joseph Smith Translation where relevant. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.

Immediate meaningIn Mark 5, Jesus demonstrates sovereign authority over three profound human afflictions: demonic possession (the Gerasene demoniac), chronic and incurable disease (the woman with the issue of blood), and physical death (Jairus's daughter). The narrative weaves these miracles together to highlight the necessity of faith, the dramatic public expulsion of unclean spirits into a herd of swine, and the intimate, private raising of a deceased child.

ReceptionThe Latter-day Saint reception of Mark 5 is deeply informed by Restoration theology concerning the nature of spirits and bodies, as well as the mechanics of priesthood power. The account of the demons begging to enter the swine (vv. 11-13) intersects directly with LDS teachings regarding the pre-mortal existence. Joseph Smith taught that Satan and his followers were denied physical bodies due to their rebellion before the world was created. Because obtaining a physical body is a central purpose of the Plan of Salvation, these unembodied evil spirits exist in a state of punishment and desperately seek embodiment—preferring even the body of a swine to having no body at all. Regarding the woman with the issue of blood, LDS reading focuses heavily on the KJV translation that 'virtue' (power) had gone out of Jesus (v. 30). Theologians like James E. Talmage have emphasized that this healing was not a passive or automatic event, but a dynamic transfer of divine energy. The woman's active, striving faith served as the conduit that literally drew this sustaining power from the Savior. Additionally, Jairus's specific request for Jesus to 'come and lay thy hands on her' (v. 23) is understood as a primary scriptural model for the priesthood ordinance of administering to the sick, establishing a pattern of physical touch coupled with priesthood authority.

ApplicationLatter-day Saints apply this chapter both as a model for seeking healing and as a source of comfort in extreme distress. The woman pressing through the crowd is frequently cited as an example of the spiritual effort required to draw Christ's power into one's life, teaching that believers must actively reach out to Him despite obstacles or long-standing suffering. Furthermore, Jesus's counsel to Jairus, 'Be not afraid, only believe' (v. 36), is continually invoked by modern Church leaders as a watchcry for the Saints. It is used pastorally to encourage hope and trust in God's timing, especially when facing seemingly insurmountable trials, the loss of loved ones, or periods of intense fear.

Authorities named: Joseph Smith — History of the Church · James E. Talmage — Jesus the Christ · Dieter F. Uchtdorf — General Conference Addresses

Jehovah's Witnesses

Lens given to the model: Jehovah's Witness reading (Watch Tower Society): attention to the divine name, God's Kingdom as a real government, conditional immortality, and a non-Trinitarian Christology. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.

Immediate meaningIn this narrative, Jesus demonstrates profound authority over three major afflictions: demonic influence, chronic illness, and death. Upon arriving in the region of the Gerasenes, he encounters a fiercely violent man possessed by a 'Legion' of demons. The demons recognize Jesus' identity, and he permits them to enter a herd of swine, which subsequently rushes to its destruction. Returning across the sea, Jesus is approached by Jairus, a synagogue ruler, whose daughter is dying. En route to Jairus's house, a woman suffering from a twelve-year hemorrhage touches Jesus' garment and is instantly healed by power that goes out from him. Arriving at the ruler's house, Jesus dismisses the mourners by declaring the dead child is merely 'asleep,' and proceeds to restore her to life.

ReceptionJehovah's Witnesses read Mark 5 as a powerful demonstration of Jesus' role as God's appointed King and a confirmation of key non-Trinitarian and mortalist doctrines. In verse 7, the demons address Jesus as the 'Son of the Most High God.' Watch Tower publications highlight this to argue that even wicked spirits recognize a clear distinction between Jesus and the Almighty God, Jehovah; Jesus is God's Son, not part of a Trinity. Furthermore, when Jesus perceives that 'power' has gone out of him to heal the bleeding woman (v. 30), this power is understood as Jehovah's holy spirit, or active force, which God channeled through Jesus, rather than Jesus utilizing intrinsic omnipotence as Almighty God. Most prominently, this chapter serves as a primary locus for the doctrine of conditional immortality. When Jesus states that Jairus's daughter is 'not dead, but is asleep' (v. 39), the tradition takes this as a literal description of the state of the dead. According to 'Insight on the Scriptures' and other doctrinal texts, death is a state of complete unconsciousness, comparable to a deep sleep from which one can be awakened only through a resurrection. The demons' destructive action upon the swine (v. 13) is also emphasized as evidence of the vicious, debased nature of fallen angels.

ApplicationThe tradition applies Mark 5 to provide comfort regarding the state of the dead and hope for the future. The resurrection of Jairus's daughter is frequently used in Watch Tower literature and memorial services to assure mourners that their loved ones are merely 'sleeping' in death, awaiting an awakening. This miracle is presented as a small-scale foregleam of the global resurrection that will occur on earth under God's Kingdom. Additionally, the account of the demoniac serves as a stark warning against spiritism, illustrating the danger of demonic influence and reinforcing the necessity of relying on Jehovah for protection. Finally, Jesus' instruction to the healed demoniac to 'go home to your relatives, and report to them all the things Jehovah has done for you' (v. 19, per the New World Translation's rendering of 'Lord' to 'Jehovah' in this context) is used to encourage evangelism, demonstrating that experiencing God's mercy should naturally lead to sharing it with others.

Authorities named: Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Jesus-The Way, the Truth, the Life · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — What Does the Bible Really Teach?

Step 4Establish the original-language basis

The rendering is built from the source text, not from the English majority.

Textual basis — Greek text provided, reflecting a critical edition (e.g., Nestle-Aland/Westcott-Hort tradition).

Divine names — Theos (God), Kyrios (Lord)

Variants flagged
  • v1: Textual variant regarding the location: Γερασηνῶν (Gerasenes) versus Γαδαρηνῶν (Gadarenes) or Γεργεσηνῶν (Gergesenes).
  • v14: The phrase 'αὐτοὺς χοίρους' is an unusual manuscript reading or conflation; major witnesses read 'τοὺς χοίρους' or 'αὐτούς'.
Features the rendering must preserve
  • v1: (f) repetition of the preposition 'εἰς' (εἰς τὸ πέραν... εἰς τὴν χώραν).
  • v2: (c) zero-article pattern in the prepositional phrase 'ἐν πνεύματι ἀκαθάρτῳ'.
  • v3: (c) multiple negation pattern for emphasis 'οὐδὲ... οὐκέτι οὐδεὶς'.
  • v4: (e) chiasm of nouns: fetters/chains (πέδαις καὶ ἁλύσεσιν) to chains/fetters (τὰς ἁλύσεις καὶ τὰς πέδας); (a) cognate connection to v3 (δῆσαι -> δεδέσθαι).
  • v5: (f) refraining spatial repetition 'ἐν τοῖς μνήμασιν καὶ ἐν τοῖς ὄρεσιν'.
  • v6: (c) definite article used with a proper name 'τὸν Ἰησοῦν'.
  • v7: (g) divine-name distribution: Ἰησοῦ, τοῦ θεοῦ, τὸν θεόν; (c) article pattern 'τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ὑψίστου'.
  • v8: (c) specific definite article pattern 'τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἀκάθαρτον' contrasting the anarthrous use in v2.
  • v9: (d) number shift from singular 'ὄνομά μοι' (my name) to plural 'πολλοί ἐσμεν' (we are many).
  • v10: (d) number shift from singular verb 'παρεκάλει' to neuter plural pronoun 'αὐτὰ'.
  • v11: (c) definite article pattern with noun and adjective 'ἀγέλη χοίρων μεγάλη'.
  • v12: (d) number shift to plural verb 'παρεκάλεσαν' matching plural subject 'πάντες οἱ δαίμονες'.
  • v13: (d) number shift with neuter plural subject 'τὰ πνεύματα' taking a plural verb 'εἰσῆλθον' (constructio ad sensum).
  • v14: (c) demonstrative/article pattern 'αὐτοὺς χοίρους'.
  • v15: (b) assonance in the string of participle endings 'καθήμενον καὶ ἱματισμένον καὶ σωφρονοῦντα'.
  • v16: (c) substantival use of the definite article 'οἱ ἰδόντες'.
  • v17: (f) repetition of the verbal root 'παρακαλεῖν', connecting back to the pleas in v10 and v12.
  • v18: (c) definite article with an aorist participle 'ὁ δαιμονισθεὶς', highlighting a completed state vs the present tense in earlier verses.
  • v19: (g) divine-name distribution: Kyrios (ὁ κύριός).
  • v20: (f) thematic repetition/contrast substituting the acting subject 'ὁ Ἰησοῦς' for 'κύριός' from v19.
  • v21: (f) spatial inclusio/repetition marking a scene shift 'πάλιν εἰς τὸ πέραν... παρὰ τὴν θάλασσαν'.
  • v22: (h) presence of the interjection/particle 'ἰδού' (Behold).
  • v23: (f) repetition of the conjunction 'ἵνα... ἵνα'.
  • v24: (d) number shift: singular collective noun 'ὄχλος' taking a plural verb 'συνέθλιβον'.
  • v25: (c) indefinite pronoun usage 'γυνὴ τις'.
  • v26: (b) alliteration and (a) cognate repetition 'πολλὰ παθοῦσα ὑπὸ πολλῶν'.
  • v27: (f) repetition in a string of aorist feminine participles 'ἀκούσασα... ἐλθοῦσα'.
  • v28: (a) cognate root repetition 'ἅψωμαι' echoing 'ἥψατο' from v27.
  • v29: (b) metaphorical wordplay 'πηγὴ τοῦ αἵματος' (fountain of blood).
  • v30: (a) cognate prefix repetition 'ἐξ αὐτοῦ δύναμιν ἐξελθοῦσαν'.
  • v31: (d) number shift: singular collective noun 'ὄχλον' with singular participle 'συνθλίβοντά', a syntactic contrast to v24.
  • v32: (c) article acting as a substantive 'τὴν... ποιήσασαν'.
  • v33: (b) assonance in feminine participles 'φοβηθεῖσα καὶ τρέμουσα'.
  • v34: (f) thematic repetition of 'σέσωκέν' (from v28) and 'μάστιγός' (from v29).
  • v35: (c) definite article pattern identifying a title 'τὸν διδάσκαλον'.
  • v36: (a) cognate / alliterative phrase 'λόγον λαλούμενον'.
  • v37: (c) double negative construction 'οὐκ ἀφῆκεν οὐδένα'.
  • v38: (b) assonance in present active plural participles 'κλαίοντας καὶ ἀλαλάζοντας'.
  • v39: (f) thematic repetition of the verb 'κλαίετε' from v38.
  • v40: (c) article structure defining parental pairs 'τὸν πατέρα... καὶ τὴν μητέρα'.
  • v41: (f) bilingual wordplay/translation explicitly provided in text 'ταλιθα κουμ -> τὸ κοράσιον... ἔγειρε'.
  • v42: (a) cognate / figura etymologica construction 'ἐξέστησαν... ἐκστάσει'.
  • v43: (c) absolute negation pattern 'μηδεὶς' mapping to an articular infinitive equivalent.

Step 5Compare the translations, verse by verse

Each difference classified: textual · lexical · grammatical · interpretive · stylistic (the last only where it changes meaning).

  • lexicalv1 lexical difference in translating the region beyond the sea — “other side” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “strait” (DRC)
  • stylisticv1 (vv 1, 8, 31, 34) stylistic preposition choice — “into” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “to” (YLT, DARBY)
  • textualv1 textual variant regarding the name of the region — “Gadarenes” (WEB, KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Gerasenes” (ASV) vs “Gerasens” (DRC)
  • interpretivev2 interpretive choice between spatial or possessive relationship to the spirit — “with” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “possessed by” (DARBY)
  • textualv5 textual variant altering the word order of mountains and tombs, and lexical translation of tombs — “tombs” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “mountains” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “monuments” (DRC)
  • textualv5 textual variant altering the word order of mountains and tombs — “mountains he was” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “tombs” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “he was” (YLT) vs “mountains” (DRC)
  • lexicalv6 lexical choice for indicating reverence or worship — “worshipped” (KJV, ASV) vs “bowed down to” (WEB) vs “bowed before” (YLT) vs “did” (DARBY) vs “worshiped” (WEBSTER) vs “adored” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv7 grammatical choice of verb form for calling out — “crying out” (WEB, ASV) vs “cried” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “crying” (DARBY, DRC) vs “having called” (YLT)
  • textualv7 textual or grammatical difference in the verb of speaking — “he” (WEB, YLT, DRC) vs “and said” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “he saith” (ASV) vs “he says” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv7 grammatical and stylistic phrasing of a common idiom — “do with thee” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you” (WEB) vs “me and to” (YLT)
  • stylisticv7 stylistic choice of archaic vs modern pronoun — “thee” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you” (WEB)
  • lexicalv8 lexical and syntactical translation of the command to exit — “Come” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER) vs “forth thou unclean spirit” (ASV) vs “forth spirit unclean” (YLT) vs “forth unclean spirit” (DARBY) vs “Go” (DRC)
  • stylisticv9 stylistic choice of pronoun — “thy” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “your” (WEB)
  • lexicalv9 lexical translation of conjunction — “is Legion for” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “because” (YLT, DARBY)
  • lexicalv10 (vv 10, 17) lexical choice for pleading — “besought” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “begged” (WEB) vs “was calling on” (YLT)
  • textualv11 textual variant regarding the description of the mountainside — “Now” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “And” (YLT, DRC) vs “on the mountainside” (WEB)
  • lexicalv11 (vv 11, 12, 13, 16) lexical choice for the herd animals — “swine” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “pigs” (WEB)
  • lexicalv13 lexical and syntactical differences in describing the permission — “And forthwith Jesus gave” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “immediately” (YLT, DRC) vs “At once” (WEB) vs “he” (ASV) vs “immediately allowed” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv13 grammatical choice of verb construction for the spirits exiting — “came” (WEB, ASV) vs “went out and entered” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “going” (DARBY, DRC) vs “did enter” (YLT)
  • lexicalv13 lexical choice for how the herd perished in the water — “choked” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “drowned” (WEB, ASV) vs “stifled” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv15 grammatical choice of tense for arriving — “come to” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “came” (WEB, DRC) vs “unto” (YLT)
  • grammaticalv16 grammatical difference in tense for seeing — “And they that saw” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “had seen” (DARBY, DRC) vs “Those who” (WEB) vs “those having seen” (YLT)
  • lexicalv16 lexical choice for reporting the event — “told” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “declared to” (WEB, YLT) vs “declared unto” (ASV) vs “related to” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv17 grammatical phrasing of the request to leave — “from” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “to depart out of” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “go away from” (YLT) vs “that he would from” (DRC)
  • lexicalv17 lexical translation of the region boundaries — “coasts” (KJV, DARBY, DRC) vs “borders” (ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “region” (WEB)
  • grammaticalv19 stylistic and grammatical difference in the verb of speaking — “to” (YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “saith unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “said to” (WEB) vs “says to” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv19 lexical choice regarding his household and people — “thy friends” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “your house to your” (WEB) vs “house unto thy” (ASV) vs “house unto thine own” (YLT) vs “thine own people” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv19 lexical choice for the extent of what was done — “how” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “what” (WEB)
  • grammaticalv19 grammatical phrasing of the action performed — “hath done for thee” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “has you” (WEB) vs “did to” (YLT) vs “has” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv20 lexical choice for departing — “went his way” (WEB, ASV, DRC) vs “departed” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “went away” (YLT, DARBY)
  • lexicalv20 lexical translation for spreading the news — “publish” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “proclaim” (WEB, YLT, DARBY)
  • grammaticalv20 grammatical phrasing of the great things done — “had done for” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “great things” (WEB) vs “did to” (YLT)
  • lexicalv20 lexical choice for expressing the people's amazement — “wondered” (DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “everyone marveled” (WEB) vs “all men did marvel” (KJV) vs “marvelled” (ASV) vs “were wondering” (YLT)
  • lexicalv21 lexical translation of proximity to the sea — “by” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “nigh unto” (KJV, DRC) vs “near” (YLT) vs “to” (WEBSTER)
  • stylisticv22 stylistic phrasing of the man's name — “Jairus by name” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “Jairus” (YLT, DARBY) vs “came” (WEB) vs “Jaïrus” (ASV) vs “named” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv22 grammatical structure for the act of seeing — “seeing” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “when he saw” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “having seen” (YLT)
  • grammaticalv22 grammatical choice of verb tense for falling down — “he fell” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER) vs “falleth” (ASV) vs “doth fall” (YLT) vs “falls down” (DARBY) vs “falleth down” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv23 grammatical choice of verb tense for begging — “besought” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “he” (DARBY, DRC) vs “begged” (WEB) vs “beseecheth” (ASV) vs “he was calling upon” (YLT)
  • lexicalv23 lexical choice for the intensity of begging — “much” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “greatly” (KJV, WEBSTER)
  • interpretivev23 interpretive translation of being at the point of death — “is” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “lieth” (KJV, WEBSTER)
  • lexicalv23 (vv 23, 28) lexical choice for being healed or saved — “healed” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “made healthy” (WEB) vs “made whole” (ASV) vs “saved” (YLT) vs “safe” (DRC)
  • textualv24 textual and stylistic difference in specifying the subject — “He” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “And Jesus” (KJV, WEBSTER)
  • lexicalv24 lexical choice for the size of the crowd — “a great multitude” (WEB, ASV, DRC) vs “much people followed” (KJV) vs “there was following” (YLT) vs “a large crowd” (DARBY) vs “many” (WEBSTER)
  • lexicalv24 lexical choice for the crowd pressing in — “thronged” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “they” (ASV, DRC) vs “they pressed upon” (WEB) vs “they were thronging” (YLT) vs “pressed on” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv25 grammatical phrasing describing the woman's condition — “who” (ASV, WEBSTER) vs “who a discharge” (WEB) vs “which had an issue” (KJV) vs “having” (YLT) vs “who had a flux” (DARBY) vs “who was under” (DRC)
  • lexicalv26 lexical choice for everything she possessed — “all that” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “everything” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv27 grammatical structure for having heard — “having” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “When she had” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
  • lexicalv27 lexical translation of the preposition concerning — “of” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the things concerning” (WEB, ASV) vs “about” (YLT) vs “concerning” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv27 grammatical and lexical phrasing of her approach — “came” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “up behind him” (WEB) vs “having come” (YLT)
  • lexicalv27 lexical choice for the crowd — “crowd” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “press behind and” (KJV) vs “multitude she” (YLT) vs “crowd him” (DRC)
  • lexicalv27 (vv 27, 30) lexical choice for clothing — “garment” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “clothes” (WEB, DARBY)
  • stylisticv28 stylistic verb choice — “shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “will” (WEB)
  • lexicalv29 lexical translation for the immediate stopping of blood — “And straightway the fountain” (KJV, ASV) vs “Immediately flow” (WEB) vs “immediately was” (YLT) vs “immediately her” (DARBY) vs “immediately” (WEBSTER) vs “forthwith” (DRC)
  • lexicalv29 lexical choice for perceiving the healing — “felt” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “knew” (YLT, DARBY)
  • grammaticalv30 grammatical choice in describing awareness — “And Jesus immediately knowing” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “Jesus” (DARBY, DRC) vs “Jesus perceiving” (WEB) vs “straightway perceiving” (ASV) vs “Jesus having known” (YLT)
  • lexicalv30 lexical choice for the multitude — “crowd” (ASV, DARBY) vs “multitude” (YLT, DRC) vs “crowd asked” (WEB) vs “press and said” (KJV) vs “throng” (WEBSTER)
  • grammaticalv30 grammatical choice of verb aspect — “touched” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “did touch” (YLT) vs “has” (DARBY) vs “hath” (DRC)
  • stylisticv31 (vv 31, 34) stylistic pronoun choice — “Thou seest” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “You see” (WEB)
  • lexicalv31 lexical phrasing of the crowd pressing — “multitude thronging thee” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “pressing against you” (WEB) vs “crowd pressing on” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv31 grammatical verb aspect — “touched” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “did touch” (YLT) vs “hath” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv32 grammatical phrasing of the one who did it — “who” (WEB, DARBY, DRC) vs “that had done” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “who did” (YLT)
  • grammaticalv33 grammatical choice for experiencing fear — “fearing” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “having been afraid” (YLT) vs “frightened” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv33 grammatical translation of what occurred to her — “was done in” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “had been to” (WEB, ASV) vs “on” (YLT) vs “had taken place” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv34 lexical phrasing of being healed — “hath made thee whole” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “has you well” (WEB) vs “saved” (YLT) vs “has healed” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv34 lexical translation of the affliction and healing — “whole of thy plague” (KJV, ASV) vs “cured your disease” (WEB) vs “from” (YLT) vs “well scourge” (DARBY) vs “healed infirmity” (WEBSTER) vs “thou disease” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv35 grammatical phrasing of the ongoing speaking and arrival — “was still speaking people” (WEB) vs “yet spake there came” (KJV) vs “they come” (ASV) vs “is speaking come” (YLT) vs “was speaking they come” (DARBY) vs “was speaking” (WEBSTER) vs “was speaking some come” (DRC)
  • lexicalv35 lexical phrasing of the synagogue official's title — “ruler of the synagogue’s” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “synagogue ruler’s” (WEB) vs “chief” (YLT)
  • grammaticalv35 grammatical phrasing of the speakers — “saying” (ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “saying Your” (WEB) vs “certain which said Thy” (KJV) vs “who” (WEBSTER)
  • grammaticalv35 grammatical choice of tense for death — “is dead” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “did die” (YLT) vs “has died” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv35 lexical choice for troubling the teacher — “troublest thou” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “bother” (WEB) vs “still dost harass” (YLT) vs “dost trouble” (DRC)
  • lexicalv35 lexical choice for the teacher's title — “Master any further” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Teacher” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “Teacher more” (WEB)
  • textualv36 textual variant involving the presence of 'immediately' — “But” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “As soon as” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “And” (YLT)
  • textualv36 textual variant between 'overhearing' and 'hearing' — “heard” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “immediately having” (YLT, DARBY) vs “when he” (WEB) vs “not heeding” (ASV) vs “having” (DRC)
  • stylisticv36 stylistic phrasing of the negative command — “Be not afraid” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “Fear” (ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “Don’t” (WEB)
  • lexicalv37 lexical choice for accompanying — “follow” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “with” (ASV, YLT) vs “accompany” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv37 lexical choice for the exception — “save” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “except” (WEB, YLT) vs “but” (DRC)
  • textualv38 textual variant in verb number (singular vs plural) — “And he cometh” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “they come” (ASV, DRC) vs “came” (WEB) vs “comes” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv38 grammatical phrasing of the mourning — “wailing” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “wailed greatly” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “great wailing” (WEB) vs “wailing much” (DRC)
  • stylisticv39 stylistic verb of speaking — “to” (YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “saith unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “said to” (WEB) vs “says to” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv39 lexical choice for the commotion — “do make a tumult” (YLT, DARBY) vs “do you an uproar” (WEB) vs “make ye this ado” (KJV) vs “a tumult” (ASV) vs “tumult” (WEBSTER) vs “you” (DRC)
  • lexicalv39 (vv 39, 41) lexical choice for the young girl — “damsel is” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “child” (WEB, ASV) vs “child did” (YLT) vs “child has” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv39 grammatical tense for death — “dead” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “die” (YLT) vs “died” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv39 grammatical phrasing of sleeping — “sleepeth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “is asleep” (WEB) vs “doth sleep” (YLT) vs “sleeps” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv40 lexical choice for mocking laughter — “laughed” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “derided” (DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “ridiculed” (WEB) vs “were laughing at” (YLT)
  • grammaticalv40 grammatical choice of participle vs finite verb — “having” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “had” (KJV, WEBSTER)
  • stylisticv40 stylistic phrasing for the companions — “them that were” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “those” (YLT, DARBY) vs “those who” (WEB) vs “her mother and” (ASV)
  • grammaticalv40 grammatical and lexical choice for entering — “entereth” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “goeth” (ASV, YLT) vs “went” (WEB) vs “enters” (DARBY)
  • textualv40 textual and lexical variant for the girl's location or state — “child” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “damsel was lying” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “child is” (YLT)
  • lexicalv41 lexical translation of the command to rise — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “say unto thee arise” (KJV, ASV) vs “tell you get up” (WEB)
  • lexicalv42 lexical translation of immediately — “Immediately” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “And straightway” (KJV, ASV) vs “forthwith” (WEBSTER)
  • lexicalv42 lexical and stylistic choice for rising — “damsel arose” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “rose up” (ASV, DRC) vs “girl rose up” (WEB)
  • grammaticalv42 grammatical phrasing of her walking — “walked for” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “was walking” (YLT) vs “and” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv42 grammatical phrasing of her age — “old” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “And” (KJV, WEBSTER)
  • lexicalv42 lexical choice for their reaction — “astonished” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “amazed” (WEB, YLT) vs “amazed straightway” (ASV)
  • lexicalv42 lexical choice for the state of amazement — “astonishment” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “amazement” (WEB, ASV, YLT)
  • lexicalv43 lexical choice for giving a command — “charged” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “strictly ordered” (WEB)
  • lexicalv43 lexical and stylistic choice for indicating 'no one' — “man should” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “one” (WEB, DARBY) vs “one may” (YLT)
  • grammaticalv43 grammatical phrasing of the object — “this” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “it” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “this thing” (YLT)
  • lexicalv43 lexical choice for ordering food to be given — “commanded” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “he” (ASV) vs “he said” (YLT) vs “he desired” (DARBY)

Step 6Synthesize — atomic claims, by family, not seat count

Every statement is split into the smallest testable claims; each eligible profile is AFFIRM / DENY / QUALIFY / UNSPECIFIED (silence is never assent); a claim rises to consensus by families. Only affirm-vs-deny is contradiction — a qualification is diversity.

The consensus

Universally across all traditions, Jesus demonstrated absolute authority over supernatural forces, chronic physical illness, and death through three distinct miracles. Many traditions affirm that the narrative of the Gerasene demoniac establishes the literal reality of demonic oppression, and it is broadly maintained that Jesus commissioning the healed man to return home serves as a biblical paradigm for lay evangelism within one's own community. Several traditions also emphasize the pastoral imperative to maintain faith despite severe crises, as seen in Jesus' command to Jairus, and contrast the bleeding woman's intentional touch with the pressing crowd to distinguish active, saving faith from superficial religious proximity. However, the theological nature of the woman's healing is disputed; traditions divide over whether the transmission of power through Jesus' garment establishes that physical matter can mediate divine grace, validating sacramental theology and relics, or whether it demonstrates that salvation is secured through unmediated, personal faith rather than any inherent power in physical garments or rituals.

Pan-Christian SUPPORT in every eligible family

  • Jesus demonstrated absolute authority over supernatural forces, chronic physical illness, and death through three distinct miracles.

    12 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 0 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation SUPPORTFree-church SUPPORT
    who said what (12)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      Mark 5 presents three interconnected miracles demonstrating Jesus' sovereign power over demons, chronic disease, and death itself.
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      In its immediate narrative context, Mark 5 presents three profound demonstrations of Jesus' authority over forces that diminish or destroy human life: the demonic realm, chronic impurity/disease, and death itself.
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      Mark 5 comprises three interlocking miracle narratives that demonstrate Jesus' absolute authority over demonic subjugation, chronic illness, and death.
    • Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
      In this chapter, Jesus demonstrates supreme authority over three destructive forces that isolate human beings from their communities: demonic possession in a Gentile territory, chronic ritual impurity, and death.
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      Mark 5 recounts three miracles demonstrating Jesus' absolute authority over the forces that destroy human life: the demonic, chronic disease, and death.
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      Mark 5 narrates three powerful demonstrations of Jesus's authority over forces that diminish and destroy human life.
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      The chapter is a narrative recording three interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus's absolute authority over the most terrifying human afflictions: demonic subjugation, incurable chronic illness, and death itself.
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      In its immediate narrative context, Mark 5 presents a triptych of Jesus' sovereign authority over forces that overwhelm human capacity: the chaotic evil of the demonic Legion in Gentile territory, a chronic flow of blood causing permanent ritual impurity, and the ultimate boundary of death in Jairus's daughter.
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      In Mark 5, the narrative follows Jesus demonstrating authority over three formidable forces: demons, chronic illness, and death.
    • Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
      Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalism receives Mark 5 as a definitive revelation of Christ's total victory over demonic oppression, chronic disease, and death.
    • Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
      The narrative recounts three distinct but interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus' supreme authority over forces that diminish or destroy human life: spiritual bondage, chronic illness, and death.
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
      In Mark 5, Jesus demonstrates absolute authority over the spiritual realm, physical disease, and death through three distinct miracles.
  • The narrative of the Gerasene demoniac establishes the literal reality of demonic oppression and Jesus' absolute authority to cast out unclean spirits.

    9 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 3 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation SUPPORTFree-church SUPPORT
    who said what (9)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      The exorcism of the Gerasene demoniac informs the Church's understanding of spiritual warfare and the Rite of Exorcism, emphasizing Christ's absolute authority over demonic forces.
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      Jesus crosses into Gentile territory and exorcises a 'Legion' of demons from a man living among the tombs, permitting the spirits to enter a herd of pigs which then perish in the sea.
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      Mark 5 comprises three interlocking miracle narratives that demonstrate Jesus' absolute authority over demonic subjugation, chronic illness, and death.
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      Mark 5 recounts three miracles demonstrating Jesus' absolute authority over the forces that destroy human life: the demonic, chronic disease, and death.
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      He exercises absolute command over the spirits, granting their request to enter a herd of pigs, which then rush into the sea.
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      The chapter is a narrative recording three interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus's absolute authority over the most terrifying human afflictions: demonic subjugation, incurable chronic illness, and death itself.
    • Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
      Against theological liberalism, the tradition reads the Gerasene demoniac narrative as establishing the literal, destructive reality of demonic forces and Jesus' supreme, uncontested authority to subjugate them (verses 1-13).
    • Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
      The narrative recounts three distinct but interconnected miracles that demonstrate Jesus' supreme authority over forces that diminish or destroy human life: spiritual bondage, chronic illness, and death. He frees a Gadarene man possessed by a legion of demons, sending them into a herd of swine;
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
      In Mark 5, Jesus demonstrates absolute authority over the spiritual realm, physical disease, and death through three distinct miracles.

Broad SUPPORT in all but one family, that one undetermined

  • Jesus commissioning the healed demoniac to return home serves as a biblical paradigm for lay evangelism and witnessing within one's own community.

    7 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 5 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation SUPPORTFree-church SUPPORT
    who said what (7)
    • Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
      Additionally, Jesus' command to the healed demoniac to 'go home to thy friends' is frequently utilized to encourage lay evangelism, validating the testimony of ordinary believers in their everyday domestic spheres.
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      Finally, the healed demoniac's commission (v. 19) is applied as a paradigm for ordinary Christian witness, calling believers to testify to their communities about the sovereign mercy the Lord has shown them.
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      The healed demoniac's commission to go home and tell his friends serves as a universal mandate for all converted individuals to engage in personal testimony and lay evangelism.
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      Views Christ's command to the delivered man to return home as establishing a model for domestic and local evangelism, demonstrating that true religion immediately makes a person a blessing to their own household.
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      Additionally, Jesus' instruction to the healed man to remain and tell his community what the Lord has done (v. 19) serves as a foundational model for Anabaptist evangelism: witnessing to God's restorative mercy through transformed, nonviolent living within local communities.
    • Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
      The formerly possessed man, who is instructed to 'Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee' (Mark 5:19), is held up as a model for lay evangelism; believers are taught that personal testimony of Christ's restorative power is often the most effective witness.
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
      The healed demoniac's return to his friends to report the Lord's mercy is heavily utilized as a straightforward pattern for personal evangelism.

Family-specific characteristic of one family

  • The demons' request to enter the pigs demonstrates that demonic forces are completely subject to the sovereign permission of Christ and cannot act without it.

    2 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (2)
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      They cannot so much as touch animals without Christ's permissive will, emphasizing God's absolute sovereignty and the ultimate powerlessness of the demonic.
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      Calvin argues that the demons' plea to enter the swine (vv. 12-13) decisively proves that Satan and his agents are completely bridled by God's sovereign decree; they can do absolutely nothing without Christ's explicit permission.
  • The degradation of the demoniac and his subsequent restoration illustrates a cosmic conflict between Satan's intent to destroy and Christ's power to restore.

    2 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (3)
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      Redemptive-historically, commentators like William Hendriksen read these three miracles not merely as isolated acts of compassion, but as eschatological signs: Christ the Covenant King is actively inaugurating His kingdom by comprehensively subduing demonic tyranny, incurable disease, and death itself.
    • Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
      The degradation of the demoniac and his subsequent restoration illustrate the great-controversy theme, contrasting Satan's intent to destroy with Christ's power to restore;
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
      In Churches of Christ, Mark 5 is frequently preached to illustrate the destructive nature of sin (mirrored by the demoniac's self-harm and isolation) and the total restorative power of Jesus.
  • The demoniac's restoration to a 'right mind' represents the holistic peace and spiritual sanity brought by radical personal conversion and justifying grace.

    2 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (2)
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      The man's transition from uncontrollable depravity to sitting 'clothed, and in his right mind' is heralded as the hallmark of the new birth.
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      John Wesley and early Methodist commentators like Adam Clarke read the Gerasene demoniac's restoration to his 'right mind' (v. 15) as a profound metaphor for the spiritual sanity that accompanies justifying grace, contrasting it with the inherent madness and self-destruction of a life governed by sin.
  • The narrative of the demoniac serves as an ascetic type for the healing of the passion-bound soul and its restoration to spiritual stillness.

    2 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (2)
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      Ascetically, the demoniac dwelling in the tombs represents the human nous (the eye of the soul) darkened by passions and spiritual death; his restoration to his 'right mind' sitting at the feet of Jesus is the goal of Orthodox psychotherapy and hesychastic prayer.
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      His restoration to being 'clothed and in his right mind' represents the ascetic goal of inner unification and hesychia (stillness) achieved solely through the authoritative command of Christ.
  • Jesus' command to Jairus to 'only believe' establishes a pastoral imperative to maintain faith in Christ's word despite severe crises and contradictory natural evidence.

    5 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 7 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church SUPPORT
    who said what (5)
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      When confronted with physical death or despair, Christians are taught to model Jairus and the bleeding woman by clinging strictly to the external Word of Christ ('only believe') rather than their own feelings or dire circumstances.
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      Pastors also use Jesus's words to Jairus, 'only believe,' to comfort believers facing seemingly impossible grief or terminal circumstances.
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      Additionally, Jesus' word to Jairus, 'Fear not, only believe' (v. 36), is frequently invoked in Wesleyan pastoral care as an exhortation to maintain faith when sensory evidence and circumstances dictate despair.
    • Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
      The mandate to 'only believe' (verse 36) functions as a ubiquitous pastoral encouragement to maintain faith during severe crises or negative medical reports.
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
      Additionally, Jesus' command to Jairus, 'only believe' (verse 36), is applied to encourage believers facing insurmountable grief or fear, with the understanding that such belief inherently involves continued obedience and trust in Christ's word.

Tradition-specific one tradition only

  • The miracles provide factual, historical evidence intended to serve as apologetic proof of Jesus' divine sonship.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
      Commentators in this tradition read these miracles as literal, historical facts recorded specifically to produce rational faith in Jesus as the Son of God.
  • The three miracles function redemptive-historically to display Christ's systematic reversal of the curse of the Fall.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      Reformed theology reads Mark 5 through the distinct lenses of God's absolute sovereignty and the redemptive-historical mission of the Mediator to reverse the curse of the Fall.
  • The failure of chains and fetters to tame the demoniac contrasts with Jesus' ability to restore him to peace through nonviolent, verbal authority.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      The restored demoniac—found 'sitting, clothed, and in his right mind' (v. 15)—is viewed as the archetypal picture of the peaceable kingdom, contrasting sharply with the world's failed attempts to control violence with chains and fetters (v. 4).
  • The destruction of the swine and the fear of the locals reveals a human tendency to value economic stability and the status quo over human liberation.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      The townspeople's rejection of Jesus illustrates a societal preference for the economic status quo and managed violence over the disruptive liberation brought by the Kingdom of God.
  • The inability of human effort to cure the bleeding woman or bind the demoniac illustrates the total helplessness of humanity under the Law.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      The helplessness of the demoniac, the bleeding woman, and the dead girl typifies the human condition under the Law: completely bound by Satan, incurable by human effort, and spiritually dead.
  • The power that left Jesus to heal the woman is identified as God's uncreated divine energy radiating through Christ's human nature.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      The 'power' (dynamis) that Jesus perceives going out from Him (v. 30) is interpreted by theologians like Gregory Palamas as the uncreated divine energy, which is communicated to creation through the deified physical flesh of the incarnate Christ.
  • The transmission of power through Jesus' garment demonstrates that His human nature possesses divine majesty, supporting the communication of attributes.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      The healing of the woman with the flow of blood demonstrates that Christ's human nature exercises divine, life-giving power, supporting the communication of attributes and sacramental realism.
  • The raising of Jairus's daughter by the hand demonstrates that Christ's human flesh is inherently life-giving due to its union with the Word.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      Theologians like Severus of Antioch point to these physical acts of healing as proof of the 'life-giving flesh' (zoopoios sarx).
  • Jesus' healings of the bleeding woman and Jairus's daughter demonstrate a kingdom ethic that prioritizes human restoration over rigid adherence to ritual purity laws.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      In the subsequent healings, Anabaptist readers highlight Jesus' willingness to cross strict religious purity boundaries (touching a bleeding woman and a corpse) to prioritize human restoration over legalism.
  • The two healed females represent the Gentile Church and the Jewish Synagogue in patristic ecclesiological typology.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      Latin reception, synthesized by Thomas Aquinas, frequently traces ecclesiological typology in the intercalated miracles: the twelve-year-old girl represents the Synagogue, while the bleeding woman represents the Gentile Church which approaches Christ from behind to be healed.
  • The sequence of raising the dead girl and commanding she be given food typologically represents the sequence of the Sacraments of Penance and the Eucharist.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      Finally, the raising of Jairus's daughter is applied to the Sacrament of Penance, where the spiritually dead are restored to life by Christ's word, and then immediately directed to receive the Eucharist to sustain their renewed state of grace.
  • Jesus' description of the dead girl as sleeping constitutes definitive proof of conditional immortality, showing that the dead are unconscious.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (1)
    • Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
      Adventists argue this verse proves that death is an unconscious state of rest, rather than the separation of an immortal soul from the body.

Mentioned across families affirmed somewhere in each family, no majority — not consensus

  • The woman's intentional touch is contrasted with the pressing crowd to distinguish active, saving faith from superficial religious proximity.

    4 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 8 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (4)
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      The crowd presses against His humanity without spiritual comprehension, but the woman's faith directly encounters the life-giving divine power united to His flesh.
    • Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
      The Evangelical tradition, typified by J. C. Ryle, places heavy emphasis on the contrast between the multitude that merely 'thronged' Jesus and the woman who touched him with saving faith, using this to distinguish outward religious observance from inward, active trust.
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      Rather than viewing the woman's touch of Christ's garment as evidence of sacramental or mediated grace, Baptist expositors sharply distinguish between the crowd that merely pressed against Jesus physically and the woman who touched Him with personal, active faith.
    • Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
      The woman with the issue of blood serves as a homiletic illustration of the difference between casual association with the church (the pressing crowd) and active, saving faith (the intentional touch).
  • Jesus' declaration that the girl is merely sleeping establishes that, for the believer, death is transformed into a temporary slumber preceding the resurrection.

    3 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (3)
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      The raising of Jairus's daughter (vv. 35-43) establishes the Orthodox eschatological view of death as a mere 'sleep' (koimesis) from which Christ will awaken humanity, prefiguring the general resurrection.
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      The declaration that the girl 'is not dead, but sleepeth' (v. 39) is frequently used in Lutheran funeral preaching to comfort mourners that, in Christ, death has been reduced to a temporary slumber from which the believer will be easily awakened.
    • Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
      Finally, the doctrine of soul sleep drawn from verse 39 is applied pastorally to comfort grieving families, assuring them that their dead loved ones are resting peacefully and unconsciously until the resurrection morning.

Disputed a family is mixed, or families affirm vs deny

  • The demonic name 'Legion' carries imperial overtones, framing the exorcism as a demonstration of Jesus' nonviolent victory over socio-political and systemic oppression.

    1 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (2)
    • Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
      'Legion' is recognized as a term of imperial military occupation, framing the exorcism as a liberation from systemic oppression, while all three miracles are celebrated for restoring marginalized individuals to their families, communities, and social agency.
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      The term 'Legion' invokes the socio-political reality of Roman military occupation, and the exorcism functions as a demonstration of Jesus' nonviolent victory over imperial powers.
  • The woman's physical act of touching Jesus' garment demonstrates that biblical faith is inherently active and obedient, requiring physical action.

    1 affirm · 2 deny · 0 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation OPPOSEFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (3)
    • Lutheran · DENY
      Jesus' instruction to Jairus and the woman exemplifies justifying faith as a passive reception that clings to Christ's naked Word despite the contradictory evidence of the senses or reason.
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
      Calvin notes that her belief that physical contact with Christ's garment was necessary (v. 28) was mixed with a degree of superstition or theological error.
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
      C.E.W. Dorris notes that the woman with the issue of blood possessed a faith that drove her to physical action (touching the garment); her faith was not merely intellectual ascent but was 'active' and 'obedient,' a recurring thematic requirement for salvation in Restorationist theology.
  • The woman's belief that she needed to touch Jesus's garment contained theological error, yet Christ graciously accommodated and honored the genuine faith beneath it.

    1 affirm · 1 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient LEANING-CONTESTEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (2)
    • Eastern Orthodox · DENY
      Furthermore, because this divine energy healed the woman through the medium of His physical clothes, John of Damascus and later Byzantine defenders of icons cite this passage as definitive proof that matter is not inherently evil and can become a vehicle for divine grace, establishing the biblical foundation for the veneration of relics and holy objects.
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      However, because her faith was fundamentally directed toward the true Redeemer, Christ graciously accommodated her weakness, honoring her faith and correcting her understanding by attributing the healing to her trust in Him (v. 34).
  • The woman's healing demonstrates that salvation is secured through unmediated, personal faith rather than through any inherent power in physical garments or rituals.

    2 affirm · 4 deny · 1 qualify · 5 silentAncient OPPOSEReformation MIXEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (7)
    • Catholic · DENY
      The healing of the bleeding woman encourages devotion to the sacraments, sacramentals, and relics, teaching that faith expressed through physical proximity to sacred things mediates Christ's healing.
    • Eastern Orthodox · DENY
      Furthermore, because this divine energy healed the woman through the medium of His physical clothes, John of Damascus and later Byzantine defenders of icons cite this passage as definitive proof that matter is not inherently evil and can become a vehicle for divine grace, establishing the biblical foundation for the veneration of relics and holy objects.
    • Oriental Orthodox · DENY
      Liturgically and sacramentally, the physical mediations of healing in this chapter—the touch of a garment and the grasping of a hand—undergird the Oriental Orthodox reliance on material elements (water, oil, the Eucharistic elements) to transmit divine grace.
    • Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
      The Anglo-Catholic tradition views the transmission of 'virtue' or power through Jesus' garments as profoundly incarnational, pointing to it as a scriptural defense for sacramental theology—the belief that God uses material elements to mediate spiritual grace.
    • Lutheran · DENY
      Just as divine power was mediated physically through His body and garment, Lutheran dogmatics assert that Christ's body and blood truly mediate forgiveness and life in the Eucharist.
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      However, because her faith was fundamentally directed toward the true Redeemer, Christ graciously accommodated her weakness, honoring her faith and correcting her understanding by attributing the healing to her trust in Him (v. 34).
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      The woman's healing demonstrates that active, personal faith is the instrument of salvation, distinguishing it from any inherent power in the physical garment or mere physical proximity to Christ.
  • The transmission of healing power through Jesus' garment establishes that physical matter can mediate divine grace, validating sacramental theology and the veneration of relics.

    2 affirm · 2 deny · 3 qualify · 5 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTED
    who said what (7)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      The healing of the bleeding woman encourages devotion to the sacraments, sacramentals, and relics, teaching that faith expressed through physical proximity to sacred things mediates Christ's healing.
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      Furthermore, because this divine energy healed the woman through the medium of His physical clothes, John of Damascus and later Byzantine defenders of icons cite this passage as definitive proof that matter is not inherently evil and can become a vehicle for divine grace, establishing the biblical foundation for the veneration of relics and holy objects.
    • Oriental Orthodox · QUALIFY
      Liturgically and sacramentally, the physical mediations of healing in this chapter—the touch of a garment and the grasping of a hand—undergird the Oriental Orthodox reliance on material elements (water, oil, the Eucharistic elements) to transmit divine grace.
    • Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
      The Anglo-Catholic tradition views the transmission of 'virtue' or power through Jesus' garments as profoundly incarnational, pointing to it as a scriptural defense for sacramental theology—the belief that God uses material elements to mediate spiritual grace.
    • Lutheran · QUALIFY
      The healing of the woman with the flow of blood demonstrates that Christ's human nature exercises divine, life-giving power, supporting the communication of attributes and sacramental realism.
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
      Calvin notes that her belief that physical contact with Christ's garment was necessary (v. 28) was mixed with a degree of superstition or theological error.
    • Baptist · DENY
      Rather than viewing the woman's touch of Christ's garment as evidence of sacramental or mediated grace, Baptist expositors sharply distinguish between the crowd that merely pressed against Jesus physically and the woman who touched Him with personal, active faith.
  • Christ's physical mediations of healing provide a biblical foundation for specific sacramental rites of the sick, such as unction and the laying on of hands.

    3 affirm · 1 deny · 0 qualify · 8 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTED
    who said what (4)
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      The woman's touch of Christ's garment is applied directly to the Mysteries (Sacraments), particularly the Eucharist and Holy Unction, where believers physically touch and consume the life-giving body and blood of Christ for the healing of soul and body.
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      The healing of the woman is frequently invoked in the Coptic and Syriac rites for the Unction of the Sick, presenting Christ as the supreme Physician who heals without medicine.
    • Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
      The physical mediation of Christ's healing power informs the rites of the Ministration to the Sick in the Book of Common Prayer, particularly the laying on of hands and unction.
    • Baptist · DENY
      Rather than viewing the woman's touch of Christ's garment as evidence of sacramental or mediated grace, Baptist expositors sharply distinguish between the crowd that merely pressed against Jesus physically and the woman who touched Him with personal, active faith.
  • The healing of the woman demonstrates that active, expectant faith operates as a catalyst to draw tangible healing power from Christ.

    4 affirm · 1 deny · 0 qualify · 7 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation MIXEDFree-church UNDETERMINED
    who said what (5)
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      The woman's faith drew out healing power, contrasting her intentional spiritual touch with the uncomprehending physical pressing of the crowd.
    • Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
      Faith is presented as the vital catalyst for these life-giving encounters.
    • Lutheran · DENY
      Jesus' instruction to Jairus and the woman exemplifies justifying faith as a passive reception that clings to Christ's naked Word despite the contradictory evidence of the senses or reason.
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      Interprets the woman's physical healing as a direct parallel to spiritual salvation, noting that faith is the necessary instrument that draws upon Christ's divine power (virtue).
    • Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
      Figures such as Smith Wigglesworth (Ever Increasing Faith) utilized this pericope to argue that faith acts as a necessary catalyst, actively reaching out to draw physical healing from Christ (verse 34).
  • Jesus' statements 'your faith has made you well' and 'only believe' prove that justifying faith operates as a passive reception of Christ's promise rather than a meritorious work.

    1 affirm · 1 deny · 1 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTED
    who said what (3)
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      Faith is not a meritorious work, but a receptive organ that clings solely to Christ's promise, even when the evidence of the senses and human reason (the doctors' failure, the daughter's apparent death, the mocking crowd) contradict it.
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
      Furthermore, the woman with the issue of blood is viewed through the lens of prevenient grace and human response: her healing illustrates the synergy of faith. While she must exercise the volition to reach out (vv. 27-28), it is explicitly Christ's power or 'virtue' (v. 30) that affects the cure.
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
      The woman who pressed through the crowd to touch Jesus is held up as a model for the sinner who must actively respond to the gospel call rather than waiting passively.

Step 7Render the New Consensus Bible

From the original-language text. The traditions document reception; they do not vote on wording. Every contested wording the rendering settled is listed below, not hidden.

1And they came to the other side of the sea, to the country of the Gerasenes. 2And when he had come out of the boat, immediately a man with an unclean spirit met him out of the tombs, 3who had his dwelling in the tombs. And no one was able to bind him anymore, not even with a chain, 4because he had often been bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been torn apart by him and the fetters broken in pieces, and no one had the strength to tame him. 5And constantly, night and day, in the tombs and in the mountains, he was crying out and cutting himself with stones. 6And seeing Jesus from a distance, he ran and bowed down to him, 7and crying out with a loud voice, he said: "What have I to do with you, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? I adjure you by God, do not torment me." 8For he had been saying to him, "Come out of the man, you unclean spirit!" 9And he asked him, "What is your name?" And he replied, saying to him, "My name is Legion, because we are many." 10And he begged him earnestly that he would not send them out of the country. 11Now there was a great herd of pigs feeding there on the mountainside. 12And all the demons begged him, saying, "Send us into the pigs, so that we may enter into them." 13And immediately Jesus gave them permission. And the unclean spirits came out and entered into the pigs; and the herd rushed down the steep bank into the sea—they were about two thousand—and were drowned in the sea. 14And those who fed the pigs fled and reported it in the city and in the country. And the people came to see what it was that had happened. 15And they came to Jesus, and observed the demon-possessed man sitting, clothed, and in his right mind—the very one who had had the legion—and they were afraid. 16And those who had seen it described to them how it had happened to the demon-possessed man, and about the pigs. 17And they began to beg him to depart from their region. 18And as he was getting into the boat, the man who had been demon-possessed begged him that he might be with him. 19But Jesus did not allow him, but said to him, "Go to your home, to your own people, and report to them how much the Lord has done for you, and how he had mercy on you." 20And he went away and began to proclaim in the Decapolis how much Jesus had done for him, and everyone marveled. 21And when Jesus had crossed over in the boat again to the other side, a great crowd gathered to him, and he was by the sea. 22And one of the synagogue rulers, named Jairus, came, and seeing him, fell at his feet, 23and begged him earnestly, saying, "My little daughter is at the point of death. Come and lay your hands on her, so that she may be healed and live." 24And he went with him. And a great crowd followed him, and they pressed against him. 25And a certain woman, who had a flow of blood for twelve years, 26and had suffered much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was not helped at all, but rather grew worse, 27having heard the things concerning Jesus, came up in the crowd behind him and touched his garment. 28For she was saying, "If I just touch his garments, I will be healed." 29And immediately the fountain of her blood was dried up, and she knew in her body that she was healed from her affliction. 30And immediately Jesus, perceiving in himself that the power had gone out from him, turned around in the crowd and said, "Who touched my garments?" 31And his disciples said to him, "You see the crowd pressing against you, and you say, 'Who touched me?'" 32And he looked around to see the woman who had done this. 33But the woman, fearing and trembling, knowing what had happened to her, came and fell down before him and told him the whole truth. 34And he said to her, "Daughter, your faith has healed you. Go in peace, and be cured of your affliction." 35While he was still speaking, people came from the synagogue ruler's house, saying, "Your daughter is dead. Why bother the Teacher any further?" 36But Jesus, overhearing the word being spoken, said to the synagogue ruler, "Do not be afraid, only believe." 37And he allowed no one to follow him, except Peter, James, and John the brother of James. 38And they came to the house of the synagogue ruler, and he saw a commotion, and people weeping and wailing loudly. 39And when he had entered, he said to them, "Why do you make a commotion and weep? The child is not dead, but is sleeping." 40And they ridiculed him. But he, having put them all out, took the father and the mother of the child, and those who were with him, and went in where the child was lying. 41And taking the child by the hand, he said to her, "Talitha cumi," which is translated, "Little girl, I say to you, arise." 42And immediately the girl arose and walked, for she was twelve years old. And immediately they were amazed with great amazement. 43And he gave them strict orders that no one should know this, and commanded that something be given to her to eat.

Choices made — every dispute the rendering settled

VerseSourceOptionsChoiceWhyCat.
v1τὸ πέραν“other side” (T) vs “strait” (T)other sidealigns with the primary geographical sense of crossing the Sea of Galileelexical
v1εἰς“into” (T) vs “to” (T)tocreates natural English phrasing while establishing the spatial directionstylistic
v1Γερασηνῶν“Gadarenes” (T) vs “Gerasenes” (T, S, A) vs “Gerasens” (T)Gerasenesfollows the best early manuscript readings which support the difficult geographical readingtextual
v1εἰς τὸ πέραν... εἰς τὴν χώρανrepetition of the preposition εἰς (S) vs flattening (T)flatteningrendered as 'to... to' rather than strictly mirroring the double 'into... into' for English fluencystylistic
v2ἐν πνεύματι“with” (T, S) vs “possessed by” (T)withpreserves the literal spatial relationship of the Greek preposition 'ἐν' rather than interpreting possessioninterpretive
v2ἐν πνεύματι ἀκαθάρτῳzero-article pattern preserved (S) vs flattened (T)preservedmaintains the indefinite character of the original Greek constructiongrammatical
v3οὐδὲ ἁλύσει οὐκέτι οὐδεὶςmultiple negation pattern preserved (S) vs simplified (T)preservedmaintains the forceful emphasis of the source text's triple negationgrammatical
v4πέδαις καὶ ἁλύσεσιν... τὰς ἁλύσεις καὶ τὰς πέδαςchiasm of nouns preserved (S) vs sequential ordering (T)preservedmaintains the literary structural feature of crossing terms found in the Greekstylistic
v4δεδέσθαιcognate connection preserved (S) vs obscured (T)preservedconnects the past participle to the infinitive used in the preceding verselexical
v5ἐν τοῖς μνήμασιν καὶ ἐν τοῖς ὄρεσιν“tombs and in the mountains” (T, S) vs “mountains and in the tombs” (T)tombs and in the mountainsfollows the direct word order of the critical Greek texttextual
v5μνήμασιν“tombs” (T, S) vs “monuments” (T)tombsaccurately conveys the burial context of the structureslexical
v5ἐν τοῖς... καὶ ἐν τοῖςspatial repetition preserved (S) vs flattened (T)preservedmaintains the rhythmic repetition of 'in the' reflecting the Greek prepositionstylistic
v6τὸν Ἰησοῦνdefinite article used with a proper name preserved (S) vs flattened (T)flattenedEnglish syntax does not support definite articles before standard proper namesgrammatical
v6προσεκύνησεν“worshipped” (T) vs “bowed down to” (T) vs “bowed before” (T) vs “did homage” (T) vs “adored” (T)bowed down toconveys deep physical reverence without strictly necessitating theological worship from a demonlexical
v7κράξας“crying out” (T) vs “cried” (T) vs “crying” (T) vs “having called” (T)crying outcaptures the ongoing or attendant action of the aorist participle in this contextgrammatical
v7λέγει“he” (T, S) vs “and said” (T) vs “he saith” (T) vs “he says” (T)he saidtranslates the historical present for a contemporary audience using standard past narrative tensetextual
v7τί ἐμοὶ καὶ σοί“do with thee” (T) vs “you” (T) vs “me and to” (T)do with yourenders the semitic idiom naturally in modern English while avoiding archaismsgrammatical
v7Ἰησοῦ, τοῦ θεοῦ, τὸν θεόνdivine-name distribution preserved (S) vs harmonized (T)preserveddistinguishes Jesus from the titles of God exactly as arranged in the textinterpretive
v7τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ὑψίστουarticle pattern preserved (S) vs smoothed (T)smoothedrendered as 'Most High God' rather than 'the God the Most High' for natural syntaxgrammatical
v8ἔξελθε“Come” (T) vs “forth thou unclean spirit” (T) vs “forth spirit unclean” (T) vs “forth unclean spirit” (T) vs “Go” (T)Come out of the man, you unclean spirit!provides a forceful imperative that matches the spatial dynamic of exiting the manlexical
v8τὸ πνεῦμα τὸ ἀκάθαρτονspecific definite article pattern preserved (S) vs vocative flattening (T)vocative flatteningthe articular construction functions as a vocative which requires flattening in Englishgrammatical
v9σοι“thy” (T) vs “your” (T)yourmodernizes the archaic second-person pronounstylistic
v9ὅτι“is Legion for” (T) vs “because” (T, S)becauseaccurately reflects the explanatory conjunction 'ὅτι'lexical
v9ὄνομά μοι... πολλοί ἐσμενnumber shift singular to plural preserved (S) vs harmonized (T)preservedretains the jarring shift from 'my name' to 'we are many' present in the Greek textgrammatical
v9λεγιὼνmilitary designation as literal (T, S) vs sociopolitical allegory (A)literaltranslates the Latin loanword directly without resolving the interpretive dispute over allegorical imperial subversioninterpretive
v10παρεκάλει“besought” (T) vs “begged” (T) vs “was calling on” (T)beggeduses contemporary vocabulary for intense pleadinglexical
v10παρεκάλει... αὐτὰnumber shift singular verb to neuter plural pronoun preserved (S) vs harmonized (T)preservedmaintains the source text's shift in grammatical number indicating the collective nature of the entitygrammatical
v11δὲ“Now” (T) vs “And” (T) vs “on the mountainside” (T)Noweffectively translates the transitional postpositive particle 'δὲ'textual
v11χοίρων“swine” (T) vs “pigs” (T, A)pigsutilizes standard modern English vocabulary for the herd animalslexical
v11ἀγέλη χοίρων μεγάληdefinite article pattern with noun and adjective preserved (S) vs flattened (T)flattenedEnglish syntax requires reordering the adjective before the noun without multiple articlesgrammatical
v12παρεκάλεσανnumber shift to plural verb preserved (S) vs flattened (T)preservedreflects the grammatical pluralization of the demons' pleagrammatical
v13ἐπέτρεψεν αὐτοῖς εὐθέως ὁ Ἰησοῦς“And forthwith Jesus gave” (T) vs “immediately” (T) vs “At once” (T) vs “he” (T) vs “immediately allowed” (T)And immediately Jesus gave them permissionsynthesizes the immediate action and the granting of leave clearlylexical
v13ἐξελθόντα“came” (T) vs “went out and entered” (T) vs “going” (T) vs “did enter” (T)came out and enteredtranslates the aorist participle as an independent sequential action for readabilitygrammatical
v13ἐπνίγοντο“choked” (T) vs “drowned” (T) vs “stifled” (T)drownedprovides the most precise standard English term for death by asphyxiation in waterlexical
v13τὰ πνεύματα... εἰσῆλθονconstructio ad sensum number shift preserved (S) vs grammaticalized (T)preservedkeeps the plural verb attached to the neuter plural subject reflecting the source text's logicgrammatical
v14αὐτοὺς χοίρουςdemonstrative/article pattern preserved (S) vs simplified (T)simplifiedtranslates 'αὐτοὺς' in context simply as 'the pigs' rather than 'the pigs themselves' to avoid redundancygrammatical
v15ἔρχονται... καὶ θεωροῦσιν“come to” (T) vs “came” (T) vs “unto” (T)cametranslates the historical present verbs into narrative past tense for consistencygrammatical
v15καθήμενον καὶ ἱματισμένον καὶ σωφρονοῦνταassonance in participle endings preserved (S) vs flattened (T)flattenedthe repetitive Greek '-μένον' endings cannot be mirrored perfectly without distorting English meaningstylistic
v16οἱ ἰδόντες“And they that saw” (T) vs “had seen” (T) vs “Those who” (T) vs “those having seen” (T)those who had seenrenders the substantival aorist participle smoothlygrammatical
v16διηγήσαντο“told” (T) vs “declared to” (T) vs “declared unto” (T) vs “related to” (T)described tocaptures the detailed nature of providing a full narrative accountlexical
v17ἀπελθεῖν ἀπὸ“from” (T) vs “to depart out of” (T) vs “go away from” (T) vs “that he would from” (T)to depart fromprovides standard contemporary phrasing for leaving an areagrammatical
v17ὁρίων“coasts” (T) vs “borders” (T) vs “region” (T)regiontranslates 'ὁρίων' accurately as the surrounding territory rather than modern coastlineslexical
v17παρακαλεῖνrepetition of verbal root preserved (S) vs obscured (T)preservedkeeps the translation 'beg' to link back to the earlier pleas in the narrativestylistic
v18ὁ δαιμονισθεὶςdefinite article with an aorist participle preserved (S) vs simplified (T)preservedrenders as 'the man who had been demon-possessed' to highlight the completed stategrammatical
v19λέγει“to” (T) vs “saith unto” (T) vs “said to” (T) vs “says to” (T)said totranslates the historical present verb into contemporary narrative past tensegrammatical
v19οἶκόν σου πρὸς τοὺς σοὺς“thy friends” (T) vs “your house to your” (T) vs “house unto thy” (T) vs “house unto thine own” (T) vs “thine own people” (T)your home, to your own peoplecaptures both the spatial destination and the relational belonging of 'τοὺς σοὺς'lexical
v19ὅσα“how” (T) vs “what” (T)how muchaccurately conveys the quantitative nuance of 'ὅσα'lexical
v19πεποίηκεν“hath done for thee” (T) vs “has you” (T) vs “did to” (T) vs “has” (T)has done for youemploys standard modern perfect tense phrasinggrammatical
v19ὁ κύριόςdivine-name Kyrios preserved (S) vs altered (T)preservedmaintains the explicit use of 'Lord' to differentiate from Jesus in the subsequent verseinterpretive
v20ἀπῆλθεν“went his way” (T) vs “departed” (T) vs “went away” (T)went awaytranslates the basic verb of departure simply and directlylexical
v20κηρύσσειν“publish” (T) vs “proclaim” (T, S)proclaimbetter fits the public, vocal nature of the verb 'κηρύσσειν'lexical
v20ἐποίησεν“had done for” (T) vs “great things” (T) vs “did to” (T)had done formaintains syntactic consistency with the parallel phrase in the previous versegrammatical
v20ἐθαύμαζον“wondered” (T) vs “everyone marveled” (T) vs “all men did marvel” (T) vs “marvelled” (T) vs “were wondering” (T)marveledprovides an elevated yet modern expression of collective astonishmentlexical
v20ὁ Ἰησοῦςthematic repetition/contrast substituting the acting subject preserved (S) vs obscured (T)preservedretains the stark substitution of Jesus as the subject performing the acts attributed to the Lordstylistic
v21παρὰ“by” (T) vs “nigh unto” (T) vs “near” (T) vs “to” (T)bycaptures the spatial proximity indicated by the preposition 'παρὰ'lexical
v21πάλιν εἰς τὸ πέραν... παρὰ τὴν θάλασσανspatial inclusio/repetition preserved (S) vs altered (T)preservedmaintains the author's geographic framing markers indicating the scene shiftstylistic
v22ἰδούpresence of interjection 'ἰδού' dropped (T) vs preserved (S)droppedthe archaic 'behold' is dropped as it disrupts natural contemporary syntax herestylistic
v22ὀνόματι Ἰάϊρος“Jairus by name” (T) vs “Jairus” (T) vs “came” (T) vs “Jaïrus” (T) vs “named” (T)named Jairusprovides standard contemporary phrasing for identifying an individual by namestylistic
v22ἰδὼν“seeing” (T) vs “when he saw” (T) vs “having seen” (T)seeingtranslates the aorist participle effectively as a concurrent circumstantial actiongrammatical
v22πίπτει“he fell” (T) vs “falleth” (T) vs “doth fall” (T) vs “falls down” (T) vs “falleth down” (T)fellresolves the historical present tense to simple narrative past tensegrammatical
v23παρακαλεῖ“besought” (T) vs “he” (T) vs “begged” (T) vs “beseecheth” (T) vs “he was calling upon” (T)beggedresolves historical present to narrative past while modernizing the vocabularygrammatical
v23πολλὰ“much” (T) vs “greatly” (T)earnestlytranslates 'πολλὰ' idiomatically to convey the intensity of the pleadinglexical
v23ἐσχάτως ἔχει“is” (T) vs “lieth” (T)istranslates the idiomatic expression 'ἐσχάτως ἔχει' functionally without inferring literal physical postureinterpretive
v23σωθῇ“healed” (T) vs “made healthy” (T) vs “made whole” (T) vs “saved” (T) vs “safe” (T)healedtranslates the verb 'σωθῇ' contextually regarding physical restorationlexical
v23ἵνα... ἵναrepetition of conjunction 'ἵνα' flattened (T) vs preserved (S)flattenedEnglish syntax demands converting the first 'ἵνα' clause into an imperative rather than maintaining back-to-back purpose clausesstylistic
v24ἀπῆλθεν“He” (T, S) vs “And Jesus” (T)Hemaintains the unstated pronoun subject present in the Greek verbtextual
v24ὄχλος πολὺς“a great multitude” (T) vs “much people followed” (T) vs “there was following” (T) vs “a large crowd” (T) vs “many” (T)a great crowdmodernizes 'multitude' to 'crowd' while accurately conveying the magnitudelexical
v24συνέθλιβον“thronged” (T) vs “they” (T) vs “they pressed upon” (T) vs “they were thronging” (T) vs “pressed on” (T)pressed againstupdates archaic vocabulary to describe the physical pressure of the grouplexical
v24ὄχλος... συνέθλιβονnumber shift singular collective noun with plural verb preserved (S) vs harmonized (T)preservedkeeps the transition from the singular 'crowd' to the plural 'they pressed' mapping the constructio ad sensumgrammatical
v25οὖσα ἐν ῥύσει“who” (T) vs “who a discharge” (T) vs “which had an issue” (T) vs “having” (T) vs “who had a flux” (T) vs “who was under” (T)who had a flowsmooths the phrasing of 'being in a flow of blood' into standard Englishgrammatical
v25γυνὴ τιςindefinite pronoun usage preserved (S) vs specified (T)preservedtranslates 'τις' accurately as 'a certain'grammatical
v26τὰ παρ᾽ αὐτῆς πάντα“all that” (T) vs “everything” (T)all thatprovides an exact translation of 'τὰ παρ᾽ αὐτῆς πάντα'lexical
v26πολλὰ παθοῦσα ὑπὸ πολλῶνalliteration and cognate repetition preserved (S) vs simplified (T)preservedmaintains the 'suffered much under many' rhetorical structure of the Greekstylistic
v27ἀκούσασα“having” (T) vs “When she had” (T)havingaccurately reflects the aorist active participle describing preceding actiongrammatical
v27τὰ περὶ“of” (T) vs “the things concerning” (T) vs “about” (T) vs “concerning” (T)concerningtranslates the plural neuter article governing the prepositional phrase elegantlylexical
v27ἐλθοῦσα“came” (T) vs “up behind him” (T) vs “having come” (T)came uprenders the aorist participle 'ἐλθοῦσα' as a finite action in English syntaxgrammatical
v27ἱματίου“garment” (T) vs “clothes” (T)garmentuses the singular form accurately representing the item of clothinglexical
v27ἀκούσασα... ἐλθοῦσαrepetition in string of aorist feminine participles flattened (T) vs preserved (S)flattenedEnglish requires converting one participle into a main verb to prevent an overly complex nested sentencestylistic
v27ἥψατο τοῦ ἱματίουactive faith via physical touch (A) vs non-tactile proximity (T)active faith via physical touchthe rendering remains neutral on whether the physical act inherently demonstrated faith, merely translating the physical touch accuratelyinterpretive
v28σωθήσομαι“shall” (T) vs “will” (T)willupdates archaic 'shall' to modern indicative intent per the rulesstylistic
v28ἅψωμαιcognate root repetition preserved (S) vs obscured (T)preservedmaintains the repetition of 'touch' connecting her internal thought to her outward actionstylistic
v28ἐὰν ἅψωμαι κἂν τῶν ἱματίωνunmediated personal faith (A) vs sacramental validation (A)unmediated personal faithtranslates the mechanical action directly without endorsing or resolving the subsequent theological dispute regarding material mediation of graceinterpretive
v29Καὶ εὐθὺς... ἡ πηγὴ“And straightway the fountain” (T) vs “Immediately flow” (T) vs “immediately was” (T) vs “immediately her” (T) vs “immediately” (T) vs “forthwith” (T)And immediately the fountainprovides standard contemporary adverbial phrasing while preserving the metaphorical nounlexical
v29ἔγνω“felt” (T) vs “knew” (T, S)knewaccurately translates 'ἔγνω' denoting absolute cognitive awareness rather than mere sensationlexical
v29πηγὴ τοῦ αἵματοςmetaphorical wordplay preserved (S) vs flattened (T)preservedretains the literal Greek imagery of a 'fountain' describing the hemorrhagestylistic
v30ἐπιγνοὺς“And Jesus immediately knowing” (T) vs “Jesus” (T) vs “Jesus perceiving” (T) vs “straightway perceiving” (T) vs “Jesus having known” (T)Jesus, perceivingemploys standard English participial syntax for concurrent cognitiongrammatical
v30ἥψατο“touched” (T) vs “did touch” (T) vs “has” (T) vs “hath” (T)touchedtranslates the aorist indicative as a simple past action without auxiliary verbsgrammatical
v30ἐξ αὐτοῦ... ἐξελθοῦσανcognate prefix repetition preserved (S) vs obscured (T)preservedmirrors the double use of 'out' (out from him... gone out) reflective of the Greek 'ἐξ'stylistic
v31βλέπεις“Thou seest” (T) vs “You see” (T)You seemodernizes archaic pronouns and verb endingsstylistic
v31ὄχλον συνθλίβοντά σε“multitude thronging thee” (T) vs “pressing against you” (T) vs “crowd pressing on” (T)crowd pressing against youuses contemporary phrasing to indicate physical compressionlexical
v31ὄχλον συνθλίβοντάnumber shift singular collective noun with singular participle preserved (S) vs harmonized (T)preservedaccurately reflects the syntax change back to singular for the crowd in contrast to verse 24grammatical
v32τὴν... ποιήσασαν“who” (T) vs “that had done” (T) vs “who did” (T)who had donerenders the aorist participle seamlessly into a relative clause in Englishgrammatical
v32τὴν... ποιήσασανarticle acting as substantive preserved (S) vs supplied noun (T)supplied nounEnglish requires inserting 'the woman' or 'the one' to carry the substantival feminine articlegrammatical
v33φοβηθεῖσα“fearing” (T) vs “having been afraid” (T) vs “frightened” (T)fearingtranslates the aorist passive participle as an active internal state consistent with tremblinggrammatical
v33γέγονεν ἐπ᾽ αὐτῇ“was done in” (T) vs “had been to” (T) vs “on” (T) vs “had taken place” (T)had happened toprovides standard contemporary phrasing for an event occurring to a persongrammatical
v33φοβηθεῖσα καὶ τρέμουσαassonance in feminine participles preserved (S) vs flattened (T)preservedmaintains the parallel rhythmic sound through the '-ing' endings 'fearing and trembling'stylistic
v34σέσωκέν“hath made thee whole” (T) vs “has you well” (T) vs “saved” (T) vs “has healed” (T)has healedutilizes contemporary terminology for physical restorationlexical
v34ὑγιὴς ἀπὸ τῆς μάστιγός“whole of thy plague” (T) vs “cured your disease” (T) vs “from” (T) vs “well scourge” (T) vs “healed infirmity” (T) vs “thou disease” (T)cured of your afflictionupdates archaic 'plague' to a fitting modern equivalent for chronic diseaselexical
v34ἡ πίστις σου σέσωκέν σεjustifying faith as passive reception (A) vs active catalyst (A)justifying faith as passive receptionthe rendering translates 'your faith has healed you' directly without resolving whether it was an active catalyst or a passive receptioninterpretive
v34σέσωκέν... μάστιγόςthematic repetition preserved (S) vs disconnected (T)preservedkeeps the direct verbal connections of 'healed' (saved) and 'affliction' (scourge) linked to their earlier usagestylistic
v35ἔτι αὐτοῦ λαλοῦντος ἔρχονται“was still speaking people” (T) vs “yet spake there came” (T) vs “they come” (T) vs “is speaking come” (T) vs “was speaking they come” (T) vs “was speaking” (T) vs “was speaking some come” (T)was still speaking, people cameharmonizes the genitive absolute with the historical present main verb into standard English narrative pastgrammatical
v35ἀπέθανεν“is dead” (T) vs “did die” (T) vs “has died” (T)is deadtranslates the aorist verb idiomatically to express the present reality of her stategrammatical
v35σκύλλεις“troublest thou” (T) vs “bother” (T) vs “still dost harass” (T) vs “dost trouble” (T)bothermodernizes the vocabulary for causing unnecessary troublelexical
v35τὸν διδάσκαλον“Master any further” (T) vs “Teacher” (T) vs “Teacher more” (T)Teacher any furthertranslates 'διδάσκαλον' precisely as Teacher rather than Masterlexical
v36δὲ“But” (T, S) vs “As soon as” (T) vs “And” (T)Butreflects the standard contrastive translation of 'δὲ' while preserving 'εὐθέως' as immediately/overhearingtextual
v36παρακούσας“heard” (T) vs “immediately having” (T) vs “when he” (T) vs “not heeding” (T) vs “having” (T) vs “overhearing” (S)overhearingcaptures the nuanced force of 'παρακούσας' which implies hearing a remark made to anotherlexical
v36μὴ φοβοῦ“Be not afraid” (T) vs “Fear” (T) vs “Don’t” (T)Do not be afraidemploys standard modern English syntax for negative imperativesstylistic
v36λόγον λαλούμενονcognate/alliterative phrase preserved (S) vs simplified (T)preservedmaintains the repetition by translating 'the word being spoken'stylistic
v37συνακολουθῆσαι“follow” (T) vs “with” (T) vs “accompany” (T)followaccurately translates the compound verb 'συνακολουθῆσαι' in this contextlexical
v37εἰ μὴ“save” (T) vs “except” (T) vs “but” (T)exceptupdates archaic 'save' to a modern preposition of exclusionlexical
v37οὐκ ἀφῆκεν οὐδέναdouble negative construction preserved (S) vs flattened (T)flattenedEnglish grammar does not permit standard double negatives, necessitating 'allowed no one'grammatical
v38ἔρχονται“And he cometh” (T) vs “they come” (T, S) vs “came” (T) vs “comes” (T)they cametranslates the plural historic present verb accurately into narrative pasttextual
v38ἀλαλάζοντας πολλά“wailing” (T) vs “wailed greatly” (T) vs “great wailing” (T) vs “wailing much” (T)wailing loudlyprovides standard contemporary adverbial modificationgrammatical
v38κλαίοντας καὶ ἀλαλάζονταςassonance in present active plural participles preserved (S) vs flattened (T)preservedmaintains parallel '-ing' structure 'weeping and wailing' to mimic the Greek repetitionstylistic
v39θορυβεῖσθε“do make a tumult” (T) vs “do you an uproar” (T) vs “make ye this ado” (T) vs “a tumult” (T) vs “tumult” (T) vs “you” (T)make a commotionupdates archaic vocabulary for an unruly disturbancelexical
v39ἀπέθανεν“dead” (T) vs “die” (T) vs “died” (T)deadtranslates the aorist verb idiomatically as a state of being in modern Englishgrammatical
v39κλαίετεthematic repetition of 'κλαίετε' preserved (S) vs obscured (T)preservedkeeps the direct link to 'weeping' mentioned in the previous versestylistic
v40κατεγέλων“laughed” (T) vs “derided” (T) vs “ridiculed” (T) vs “were laughing at” (T)ridiculedaccurately conveys the hostile mocking nature of 'κατεγέλων'lexical
v40ἐκβαλὼν“having” (T) vs “had” (T)havingpreserves the sequential aorist participle describing prior actiongrammatical
v40εἰσπορεύεται“entereth” (T) vs “goeth” (T) vs “went” (T) vs “enters” (T)went inresolves historical present to normal past narrative tensegrammatical
v40τὸ παιδίον“child” (T, S) vs “damsel was lying” (T) vs “child is” (T)childtranslates 'παιδίον' directly reflecting the primary textual evidencetextual
v40τὸν πατέρα... καὶ τὴν μητέραarticle structure defining parental pairs preserved (S) vs combined (T)preservedkeeps the double definite article 'the father and the mother' specifying the pairgrammatical
v41σοὶ λέγω, ἔγειρε“to” (T) vs “say unto thee arise” (T) vs “tell you get up” (T)say to you, arisemodernizes the pronoun but retains the direct command 'arise'lexical
v41ταλιθα κουμ, ὅ ἐστιν μεθερμηνευόμενον, τὸ κοράσιον, σοὶ λέγω, ἔγειρεbilingual wordplay preserved (S) vs omitted (T)preservedretains the explicit textual translation from Aramaic into Greek (and subsequently English)stylistic
v42εὐθὺς“Immediately” (T) vs “And straightway” (T) vs “forthwith” (T)immediatelyuses standard modern vocabulary for instant actionlexical
v42ἀνέστη τὸ κοράσιον“damsel arose” (T) vs “rose up” (T) vs “girl arose” (T)girl aroseupdates archaic 'damsel' to contemporary 'girl'lexical
v42περιεπάτει· ἦν γὰρ“walked for” (T) vs “was walking” (T) vs “and” (T)walked, fortranslates the imperfect verb indicating ongoing subsequent action, smoothed for English coordinationgrammatical
v42ἐξέστησαν... ἐκστάσειcognate construction preserved (S) vs simplified (T)preservedmaintains the rhetorical doubling of 'amazed with great amazement' mirroring the Greekstylistic
v43διεστείλατο“charged” (T) vs “strictly ordered” (T)gave strict ordersprovides standard contemporary phrasing for an intense commandlexical
v43μηδεὶς“man should” (T) vs “one” (T) vs “one may” (T)one shouldmodernizes 'no man' to the inclusive 'no one'lexical
v43μηδεὶςabsolute negation pattern preserved (S) vs modified (T)preservedmaintains the structural emphasis of complete secrecy demanded by the verbgrammatical

Limits worth knowing

  • This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
  • The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
  • The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
  • The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
  • One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
  • The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
  • Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
  • The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.