← Back to Mark 9 · Full Mark 9 study page
How the consensus for Mark 9 was built
Every step of the working, exactly as it ran. Nothing here is hand-edited: the translations came from this app’s database, each tradition’s reading was generated in isolated calls that do not see one another (isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses), and the consensus was synthesized from those readings alone.
- Model:
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)
- Generated:
- Jul 18, 2026, 7:46 PM UTC
- Method:
- claim-audited, source-language-based, family-weighted
Step 1Read the passage in every public-domain translation
7 translations, fed to every step. The AI-generated NCB is never a source.
WEB · World English Bible
KJV · King James Version
ASV · American Standard Version
YLT · Young's Literal Translation
Darby · Darby Translation
Webster · Webster Bible
DRC · Douay-Rheims (Challoner)
Step 2Each eligible tradition reads the chapter — 12 voting profiles across 3 families
Isolated AI-generated profiles that do not see one another. Genre-aware, and honest about thin material. Each reading is three layers — immediate meaning, reception, application — and every claim was checked against the source text before the vote.
Ancient Communions · The undivided-church and pre-Reformation episcopal traditions.
Catholicaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Roman Catholic tradition drawing on both Latin AND Eastern Catholic sources — and actually showing the Eastern dimension, not merely promising it: Scripture within Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium (the Catechism, the Latin Fathers, Augustine, Aquinas and the scholastics, the councils) together with the Eastern Catholic churches in communion with Rome and the Greek and Syriac Fathers they share. Sacramental and typological reading. Distinguish teaching shared across the whole Catholic communion from emphases specific to the Latin or to the Eastern Catholic churches.
Immediate meaning — Mark 9 structurally bridges the Galilean ministry and the journey to Jerusalem, beginning with a preview of eschatological glory—the Transfiguration. This glory validates Jesus' divine sonship and impending suffering, contrasting sharply with the disciples' subsequent failures: their inability to exorcise a demon, their misunderstanding of the passion prediction, their selfish arguments over greatness, and their sectarian jealousy regarding an outside exorcist. The chapter concludes with stringent warnings about the cost of discipleship, radical self-denial, and the reality of Gehenna.
Reception — The Catholic reception of Mark 9 draws richly from both Latin and Eastern traditions, particularly regarding the Transfiguration (vv. 2-8). In the Latin West, Thomas Aquinas reads the event as the supreme revelation of Christ's divine glory and a foretaste of the glorified bodies of the saints, noting a Trinitarian manifestation where the Father speaks, the Son shines, and the Holy Spirit appears in the overshadowing cloud. The Eastern Catholic tradition, heavily drawing on Maximus the Confessor, views the Taboric light as the uncreated glory of God manifesting the deification of human nature, with Christ's white garments symbolizing the spiritual illumination of creation and the deeper spiritual sense of Scripture. Regarding grace and faith, the father's cry, 'I believe; help my unbelief' (v. 24), is a foundational text for the Latin doctrine of prevenient grace. Augustine uses this verse to demonstrate that human will cannot generate saving faith without the prior, animating grace of God. In ecclesiology and sacramental theology, Jesus' command not to forbid the outsider casting out demons (vv. 38-40) is leveraged by Augustine against the Donatists to argue that the power of Christ's name extends beyond the visible bounds of the Church, securing the objective validity of sacraments (like Baptism) administered by schismatics. Finally, the vivid warnings about the 'unquenchable fire' and the 'worm [that] dieth not' (vv. 43-48) undergird the Magisterium's defined dogmas regarding the eternal reality of Hell.
Application — 1. Liturgical and Ascetical Prayer: The Feast of the Transfiguration (August 6) is celebrated globally, but in the Byzantine rite, it is a major focal point for the ascetic pursuit of theosis (deification) and the practice of the Jesus Prayer, seeking inner illumination. 2. Spiritual Warfare: The disciples' failure to cast out the demon (v. 29) anchors the Church's exorcistic and ascetical disciplines, teaching that deeply rooted sins and demonic influence yield only to 'prayer and fasting.' 3. Personal Piety: 'Lord, I believe; help my unbelief' (v. 24) is a frequent personal aspiration in Catholic devotion, often prayed before receiving the Eucharist or during times of spiritual desolation to ask God to supply what human faith lacks. 4. Moral Asceticism: The exhortation to 'cut off' the offending hand or eye (vv. 43-47) is consistently applied in spiritual direction as the mandate to sever attachments to 'near occasions of sin'—people, places, or habits that lead to spiritual death—rather than literal self-mutilation.
Authorities named: Thomas Aquinas — Summa Theologiae · Maximus the Confessor — Ambigua · Augustine of Hippo — On the Predestination of the Saints · Augustine of Hippo — On Baptism, Against the Donatists · Magisterium — Catechism of the Catholic Church
claim-level audit (7 checks)
- ✓ The Transfiguration is a foretaste of the beatific vision and the resurrected bo
- ✓ The light of the Transfiguration is the uncreated glory of God, and Christ's shi
- ✓ The father's plea for help with his unbelief demonstrates that human faith requi
- ✓ Certain forms of demonic influence and deeply entrenched sins require the asceti
- ✓ The successful use of Christ's name by an outsider establishes that the sacramen
- ✓ The imagery of Gehenna, unquenchable fire, and the undying worm establishes the
- ✓ The command to cut off limbs is interpreted ascetically as the necessity of remo
Eastern Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Eastern Orthodox tradition: Scripture within Holy Tradition and the consensus of the Fathers (patristic consensus). Emphases on theosis, the liturgy, the Septuagint text, apophatic mystery over precise definition, and the seven Ecumenical Councils.
Immediate meaning — In this narrative, Jesus reveals his divine glory to Peter, James, and John on a mountain, accompanied by Moses and Elijah. Upon descending, he heals a boy with a mute spirit after the disciples fail, stating this requires prayer and fasting. Jesus then foretells his death and resurrection, corrects the disciples' dispute over greatness by presenting a child, and delivers severe, graphic warnings about avoiding sin, stating that it is better to physically amputate limbs than to be cast whole into the unquenchable fire of Gehenna.
Reception — The Transfiguration is a cornerstone of Orthodox theology, providing the scriptural basis for the distinction between God's essence and energies. Gregory Palamas defended the light on Mount Tabor as the uncreated energy of God, visible to the disciples only because their own spiritual senses were transformed by grace. The father's plea in verse 24 is received as a supreme paradigm of human synergy, where human weakness humbly invites divine completion. Regarding the severe warnings to amputate limbs, the Orthodox patristic consensus explicitly rejects a literal reading. Theophylact of Ochrid interprets the cutting off of the hand, foot, or eye as the absolute necessity of severing internal sinful passions and cutting ties with those who lead one into wickedness, emphasizing spiritual amputation over physical mutilation.
Application — The narrative of the Transfiguration is celebrated as one of the Twelve Great Feasts (August 6), emphasizing the believer's ultimate calling to theosis (deification) by participating in the uncreated light. Christ's instruction that certain demons are cast out only by prayer and fasting forms the foundation of Orthodox asceticism, shaping the church's rigorous fasting cycles as vital tools for spiritual warfare. Additionally, the father's cry, 'I believe; help my unbelief,' is deeply woven into Orthodox piety, frequently invoked in personal prayer rules and pre-communion prayers as a confession of spiritual poverty.
Authorities named: Gregory Palamas — Triads in Defense of the Holy Hesychasts · Theophylact of Ochrid — Explanation of the Gospel of Mark
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The text literally commands the physical amputation of body parts to avoid the u
- ✓ The light of the Transfiguration is the uncreated energy of God, revealing the g
- ✓ The command to amputate limbs is interpreted as the spiritual necessity of excis
- ✓ The requirement of prayer and fasting to cast out the demon serves as the biblic
- ✓ The father's plea for help with his unbelief is used as a model prayer of synerg
Oriental Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Oriental Orthodox tradition (Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac): Scripture within the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils and the miaphysite Fathers (Athanasius, Cyril of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch). Deeply liturgical, ascetic, and typological reading; some of these churches hold wider canons.
Immediate meaning — Mark 9 narrates a sequence of dramatic revelations and intense discipleship instructions. It opens with the Transfiguration, where Jesus' uncreated glory is revealed to Peter, James, and John, accompanied by Moses, Elijah, and the voice of the Father. Descending from the mountain, Jesus performs an exorcism on a boy with a mute and deaf spirit after the disciples fail, attributing their failure to a lack of prayer and fasting. Jesus then explicitly predicts his betrayal, death, and resurrection, though the disciples do not understand. The chapter concludes with kingdom ethics: Jesus elevates a child as the model of greatness, warns against sectarianism in ministry, and delivers severe, absolute commands to excise any stumbling blocks—whether hand, foot, or eye—warning of the unquenchable fire of Gehenna.
Reception — The Oriental Orthodox tradition reads this chapter through the strict miaphysite lens established by Cyril of Alexandria and Severus of Antioch. The Transfiguration (vv. 2-8) is understood not as a temporary grace bestowed upon a human subject, but as the natural, uncreated glory of the 'one incarnate nature of God the Word' shining through His own flesh. Cyril and Severus consistently juxtapose the divine glory on Mount Tabor (vv. 2-8) with the immediate predictions of suffering and death (vv. 12, 31). They insist that the single divine subject who radiates light is the exact same subject who voluntarily suffers and dies in the flesh, fiercely rejecting any Christology that would divide the miracle-worker from the sufferer. The failure of the disciples to cast out the demon (v. 18) and Jesus' declaration that such spirits only come out by 'prayer and fasting' (v. 29) form a vital scriptural foundation for the tradition's rigorous monastic asceticism. Philoxenus of Mabbug receives the father's cry, 'Lord, I believe; help my unbelief' (v. 24), as the paradigmatic expression of the human will cooperating with divine grace, marking the threshold between natural faith and the perfect spiritual faith required of the ascetic.
Application — Liturgically, the Transfiguration (vv. 2-8) is one of the highest feasts across the communion (e.g., the Coptic Feast of the Transfiguration, the Armenian Vardavar, and the Ethiopian Buhe), celebrating the deification of human nature through its union with the Word. Ascetically, the command to cast out demons by prayer and fasting (v. 29) is woven into the extensive fasting cycles of the Coptic, Ethiopian, and Syriac calendars, where spiritual warfare is viewed as impossible without physical discipline. Furthermore, the violent imagery of cutting off the hand, foot, or eye (vv. 43-47) is universally applied in monastic literature not as literal self-mutilation, but as the absolute, uncompromising severance of the soul from sinful passions, heretical thoughts, and worldly attachments.
Authorities named: Severus of Antioch — Cathedral Homilies · Cyril of Alexandria — Scholia on the Incarnation · Philoxenus of Mabbug — Discourses
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The glory revealed in the Transfiguration is the natural, uncreated glory of the
- ✓ The subject who is transfigured in glory is indivisibly the same subject who vol
- ✓ The father's cry for help with his unbelief represents the ascetic struggle to a
- ✓ The necessity of prayer and fasting for exorcism forms a scriptural mandate for
- ✓ The commands to amputate offending body parts are applied typologically to the m
Reformation Traditions · The magisterial churches of the sixteenth-century Reformation.
Anglican / Episcopalaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Anglican tradition (including the Episcopal Church): Scripture read with tradition and reason (Hooker); the Book of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles; a comprehensiveness spanning evangelical, anglo-catholic, and broad/progressive readings — name that spectrum where the passage has been read across it.
Immediate meaning — In its immediate narrative context, Mark 9 juxtaposes the revelation of Jesus' divine glory with the persistent misunderstanding and failure of his disciples. The chapter opens with the Transfiguration, where Jesus is affirmed by a heavenly voice alongside Moses and Elijah, prefiguring his ultimate vindication. Descending the mountain, the disciples' inability to cast out a mute spirit highlights their lack of prayer and faith. Jesus subsequently predicts his death and resurrection a second time, which the disciples fail to grasp, instead arguing over their own greatness. Jesus counters their ambition by lifting up a child as the model of reception, rebukes their sectarian impulse to stop an outside exorcist, and concludes with severe, hyperbolic warnings about the absolute necessity of removing causes of sin to avoid Gehenna.
Reception — The Anglican reception of Mark 9 emphasizes the Transfiguration as a central theological node connecting incarnation, cross, and resurrection. Twentieth-century theologian Michael Ramsey extensively analyzed the event, arguing that the uncreated glory revealed on the mountain is not an escape from suffering but intimately bound to the impending passion, offering a vision of humanity ultimately transformed by divine life. In interpreting the unknown exorcist, the tradition has historically mapped the passage onto its own 'comprehensiveness.' Evangelical Anglicans, represented by J.C. Ryle, have read Jesus' command not to forbid the exorcist as a stark warning against sectarianism and an encouragement to recognize the Holy Spirit's work outside formal ecclesiastical structures. Furthermore, the severe warnings regarding Gehenna and the 'worm that dies not' became a major flashpoint for Broad Church theologians in the nineteenth century. F.W. Farrar utilized these verses to challenge the dominant doctrine of eternal conscious torment, sparking intense debates within the Church of England by suggesting that such language should be understood through a restorative rather than an endlessly punitive lens.
Application — Liturgically, the Anglican tradition elevates the Transfiguration, providing a specific feast day and employing it on the Last Sunday after the Epiphany. The Book of Common Prayer includes collects that pray for deliverance from the disquietude of the world by being granted a vision of the King in his beauty, directly applying the mountain-top experience to the spiritual life of the worshiper. Pastorally, the father's cry, 'Lord, I believe; help my unbelief,' is frequently invoked as a model of Anglican spiritual temper, validating a faith that openly holds tension, doubt, and intellectual inquiry. Ecumenically, the broad reading of 'he that is not against us is for us' continues to undergird the Anglican Communion's willingness to engage in dialogue and mutual recognition of ministries with other Christian denominations.
Authorities named: Michael Ramsey — The Glory of God and the Transfiguration of Christ · J.C. Ryle — Expository Thoughts on Mark · F.W. Farrar — Eternal Hope · William Reed Huntington — The Book of Common Prayer (US 1892)
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The Transfiguration reveals divine glory that is intrinsically linked to the cro
- ✓ The father's plea is embraced pastorally as a valid expression of faith dwelling
- ✓ The mandate to not forbid the outside exorcist is understood as an instruction a
- ✓ The severe warnings of unquenchable fire were re-evaluated by the Broad Church m
- ✓ The narrative of the Transfiguration is applied liturgically to seek spiritual p
Lutheranaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Lutheran tradition (the Book of Concord): the law–gospel distinction, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura held with the ecumenical creeds, the theology of the cross, and sacramental realism.
Immediate meaning — Mark 9 is a transitional gospel narrative in which Jesus' divine glory is briefly unveiled at the Transfiguration (vv. 2-8), only for him to immediately descend back into a world marked by suffering, unbelief, and demonic possession (vv. 14-29). Jesus reiterates his impending death and resurrection (vv. 30-32), corrects the disciples' pride with a call to childlike humility and servanthood (vv. 33-37), and issues severe apocalyptic warnings about causing offense, urging radical spiritual amputation to avoid the unquenchable fire of Gehenna (vv. 42-50).
Reception — The Lutheran tradition reads this chapter deeply through the law–gospel dialectic and the theology of the cross (theologia crucis). The Transfiguration (vv. 2-8) is a pivotal locus. Martin Luther's sermons interpret the appearance of Moses and Elijah as the Law and the Prophets bearing witness to Jesus. When the cloud overshadows them and the Father commands, 'Listen to him' (v. 7), the Law and Prophets give way to Christ alone, establishing the ultimate supremacy of the Gospel. Peter's impulsive desire to build tents (v. 5) is frequently critiqued as a 'theology of glory' (theologia gloriae)—a human attempt to secure heavenly glory and triumph while bypassing suffering. Jesus shatters this by leading them down the mountain to face demonic torment (vv. 14-29) and the reality of his impending death (vv. 31-32), demonstrating that God is revealed most profoundly in suffering and the cross. The healing of the demon-possessed boy provides a classic text for the Lutheran understanding of justification and the nature of saving faith. The father's desperate plea, 'I believe; help my unbelief' (v. 24), is formally cited in the Formula of Concord to illustrate that faith is not a human work, but a gift of the Holy Spirit. This verse encapsulates the condition of the believer as simul iustus et peccator (simultaneously justified and sinner). The tradition emphasizes that even weak, struggling faith is saving faith because it grasps Christ outside of itself, rather than relying on its own subjective intensity. Finally, the severe commands to cut off a hand or foot (vv. 43-48) are read as the strict, uncompromising preaching of the Law, intended to crush human self-righteousness and drive the terrified conscience to Christ.
Application — Liturgically, the Transfiguration is observed on the last Sunday after the Epiphany, serving as the bridge into the penitential season of Lent; the congregation conceptually 'descends the mountain' with Jesus to walk the way of the cross. Pastorally, Mark 9:24 is one of the most frequently invoked verses for comforting bruised and doubting consciences. Pastors use it to assure congregants that the very struggle against doubt and the cry for help are evidence of God-given faith, directing their focus away from the strength of their own belief and toward the objective promise of Christ. Furthermore, Jesus' welcoming of the child (vv. 36-37) is practically applied in baptismal theology to underscore that the kingdom of God is received purely as a passive gift, supporting the practice of infant baptism.
Authorities named: Martin Luther — Church Postil · Book of Concord — Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ Peter's desire to build three tabernacles reflects a theology of glory that seek
- ✓ The Father's command to 'listen to him' signifies the Law (Moses) and Prophets (
- ✓ The father's cry of 'help my unbelief' illustrates the simul iustus et peccator
- ✓ The commands to amputate body parts function as the strict use of the Law to cru
- ✓ Jesus' embrace of the child is used to emphasize that the kingdom is received pa
Reformed / Presbyterianaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Reformed tradition (Calvin; the Westminster Standards; the Heidelberg and Belgic confessions): the sovereignty of God and covenant theology, a redemptive-historical reading of Scripture, and the regulative principle.
Immediate meaning — In Mark 9, Jesus proleptically reveals his divine glory on a high mountain to Peter, James, and John, where he is joined by Moses and Elijah. The Father’s voice from a cloud commands the disciples to listen to the Son. Descending, Jesus encounters a multitude surrounding his disciples, who have failed to heal a boy with an unclean spirit. Confronting their lack of faith, Jesus heals the boy after the father's desperate plea for help with his unbelief. Jesus explains that such deliverance requires prayer. Jesus again predicts his impending death and resurrection, which the disciples fail to grasp. In Capernaum, he addresses their quiet dispute over greatness by placing a child in their midst, defining true greatness as servanthood. He instructs them not to forbid an outsider casting out demons in his name. The chapter concludes with severe warnings against causing little ones to stumble and uses hyperbolic language of bodily amputation to stress the necessity of avoiding the unquenchable fire of Gehenna.
Reception — The Reformed tradition reads this chapter through the lenses of redemptive-historical progression, the sovereignty of grace, and the realism of saving faith. At the Transfiguration (Mark 9:2-8), John Calvin argues in his *Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists* that the appearance of Moses and Elijah signifies the Law and the Prophets bearing witness to Christ. When the voice declares, "Listen to him," it marks the fulfillment of the older covenantal administrations in the Mediator. The healing of the boy (Mark 9:14-29) provides a profound exploration of human impotence and sovereign grace. The father's cry, "I believe; help my unbelief!" (v. 24), is a foundational text for Reformed soteriology regarding the perseverance and reality of saving faith. The *Westminster Confession of Faith* relies on this verse to articulate that true faith can be weak, imperfect, and heavily assailed by doubt. Calvin observes that in this life, genuine faith is always mingled with remnants of unbelief, yet God mercifully accepts it because its efficacy rests on its object, Christ, rather than its perfection. The disciples' failure (v. 29) demonstrates that ministerial power is not inherent but requires utter dependence on God. Finally, Jesus' explicit warnings about the "worm that does not die" and the "unquenchable fire" (vv. 43-48) are received as definitive proof of literal, eternal conscious punishment for the wicked. The *Westminster Confession of Faith* invokes this passage to ground the finality of the Last Judgment and the reality of hell.
Application — In pastoral application, the Reformed tradition frequently utilizes Mark 9:24 to comfort believers struggling with doubt. Pastors teach that assurance is not always absolute and that recognizing one's lack of faith and crying out to Christ is itself an act of saving faith. Congregants are encouraged to bring their imperfections directly to God, trusting that Christ supplies what is lacking. The chapter's closing warnings (vv. 43-47) are intensely applied to the doctrine of the mortification of sin. Believers are exhorted to take radical, decisive measures to root out temptations, recognizing the extreme gravity of sin. Additionally, Christ's teaching on greatness (vv. 33-35) is applied to church polity and Christian ethics, instructing pastors, elders, and all believers to govern and live through humble servanthood rather than lordly ambition.
Authorities named: John Calvin — Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists · Westminster Assembly — Westminster Confession of Faith
claim-level audit (7 checks)
- ✓ The Transfiguration marks the fulfillment of the older covenantal administration
- ✓ True saving faith can be weak, imperfect, and mixed with doubt, yet God accepts
- ✓ The inability of the disciples to cast out the demon highlights that spiritual p
- ✓ The vivid imagery of the undying worm and unquenchable fire establishes the real
- ✓ Believers struggling with assurance should find comfort in bringing their doubts
- ✓ The command to cut off body parts that cause stumbling is a mandate for the rigo
- ✓ True greatness in the church and the Christian life is defined by humble servant
Free-Church & Revival Traditions · Believers'-church, revival, and restorationist movements.
Baptistaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Baptist tradition (e.g. the 1689 Second London Confession, the Baptist Faith & Message — note the range): believers' baptism, congregational polity, liberty of conscience, a memorial reading of the ordinances, and strong emphasis on personal conversion and biblical authority.
Immediate meaning — The chapter narrates Jesus's transfiguration on a mountain, where his garments become dazzling white and he speaks with Moses and Elijah (vv. 2-4). A heavenly cloud overshadows them, and a voice commands the disciples to listen to Jesus (v. 7). Upon descending, Jesus heals a demon-possessed boy after his disciples fail, emphasizing the necessity of faith, prayer, and fasting (vv. 14-29). He proceeds privately through Galilee, predicting his betrayal, death, and resurrection (v. 31). In Capernaum, he counters the disciples' arguments about greatness by elevating a child as a model of humility and service (vv. 33-37). He instructs them not to forbid an unaffiliated exorcist acting in his name (vv. 38-40) and concludes with severe, hyperbolic warnings about the danger of causing others to stumble and the unquenchable fire of Gehenna (vv. 42-48).
Reception — Baptist theological reception of this chapter emphasizes Christological supremacy, the nature of saving faith, and the reality of divine judgment. Correcting the category of theological exegesis, the tradition reads the heavenly voice at the Transfiguration (v. 7) not just as a narrative event, but as a doctrinal establishment of Christ's supreme and final authority over the prior revelation represented by Moses (the Law) and Elijah (the Prophets). John Gill emphasizes this as proof that Christ is the sole lawgiver for the church. The father's cry, 'Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief' (v. 24), is heavily utilized in Baptist soteriology to illustrate that saving faith is a divine gift that often coexists with human frailty, a theme frequently expounded by Charles Spurgeon. Furthermore, Jesus's stark warnings about the 'unquenchable fire' and the undying worm (vv. 43-48) form a primary biblical foundation for the tradition's confession of eternal conscious punishment, explicitly informing confessional documents like the Baptist Faith and Message.
Application — In congregational life and personal piety, Baptists apply this chapter directly to evangelism, the pursuit of holiness, and ecclesiastical cooperation. Pastors frequently counsel individuals struggling with the assurance of salvation to echo the father's prayer in verse 24, encouraging them to rely on Christ's grace rather than the perfection of their own faith. The injunctions to 'cut off' the hand or foot (vv. 43-47) are applied as urgent commands for the radical mortification of personal sin and the maintenance of strict moral purity, though understood figuratively rather than literally. Additionally, verses 38-40 are often invoked to justify cooperative missional efforts with other evangelical believers outside the local Baptist congregation, balancing local church autonomy with a broader recognition of the kingdom of God.
Authorities named: John Gill — Exposition of the Old and New Testaments · Charles Spurgeon — Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit · Southern Baptist Convention — Baptist Faith and Message 2000
claim-level audit (6 checks)
- ✓ A heavenly voice speaks from the cloud, identifying Jesus as the beloved Son and
- ✓ The heavenly voice establishes Christ's supreme authority and finality over prio
- ✓ The father's cry demonstrates that saving faith is reliant on divine help and ca
- ✓ The warnings of unquenchable fire and the undying worm establish the reality of
- ✓ The command not to forbid the outside exorcist supports cooperative efforts with
- ✓ The command to amputate body parts that cause stumbling is applied to the rigoro
Methodist / Wesleyan / Holinessaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Wesleyan-Holiness tradition: prevenient grace and free response, sanctification and entire sanctification / Christian perfection, the Wesleyan quadrilateral (Scripture primary, with tradition, reason, and experience), and warm-hearted practical piety.
Immediate meaning — In its immediate narrative context, Mark 9 presents a sharp contrast between divine glory and human frailty. The chapter opens with the Transfiguration, where Jesus' divine sonship is confirmed by a heavenly voice to a select inner circle of disciples. The narrative abruptly descends to a chaotic scene where the remaining disciples are powerless to exorcise a severe demonic spirit from a boy. Jesus rebukes their lack of faith, heals the boy, and explains that such power requires prayer. The chapter concludes with Jesus predicting his death and resurrection, confronting the disciples' worldly ambitions for greatness with a call to servant leadership, and issuing severe, hyperbolic warnings about the eternal consequences of causing others to stumble or tolerating sin in oneself.
Reception — The Wesleyan-Holiness tradition receives Mark 9 as a vital text for understanding the interplay between human response and divine grace, as well as the rigorous demands of Christian discipleship. The father's cry, 'I believe; help my unbelief,' is canonically central to Wesleyan soteriology. John Wesley interpreted this not as a contradiction, but as a depiction of a soul cooperating with prevenient grace; it acknowledges the presence of initial faith while urgently petitioning Christ for the fullness of saving or sanctifying faith. The disciples' failure to cast out the demon and Jesus' subsequent instruction regarding prayer and fasting are read as a biblical mandate for the 'means of grace.' Wesley heavily emphasized that spiritual power and victory over deep-seated corruption require disciplined, warm-hearted practical piety, specifically regular fasting and fervent prayer. Furthermore, the severe commands to sever offending hands, feet, or eyes are interpreted through the lens of sanctification and entire sanctification. For Wesley, this signified the painful but absolutely necessary severing of any worldly attachment, habit, or relationship that hinders the pursuit of Christian perfection.
Application — Methodists and Holiness adherents apply this chapter primarily in the realms of spiritual discipline and the pursuit of holiness. The father's plea in verse 24 is frequently echoed in prayers and hymns as a petition for God to complete the work of faith in the believer, particularly when seeking the crisis experience of entire sanctification. Jesus' teaching on prayer and fasting is practically applied by maintaining these disciplines as essential channels for God's empowering grace, recognizing that some spiritual strongholds—often understood internally as the remnants of the 'carnal nature'—cannot be overcome without rigorous devotion. The call for radical self-denial (cutting off the offending limb) is applied as a demand for total consecration, urging believers to ruthlessly eliminate any practices or influences that might cause them to stumble into sin.
Authorities named: John Wesley — Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament · John Wesley — Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament · John Wesley — Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The father's cry is viewed as a model of the human response to prevenient grace,
- ✓ Jesus' instruction on casting out the stubborn spirit establishes fasting and pr
- ✓ The command to cut off offending body parts is interpreted as the rigorous self-
- ✓ The tradition uses the father's confession as a practical prayer for those seeki
- ✓ The warning against stumbling blocks motivates a practical ethic of total consec
Anabaptist / Mennoniteaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Anabaptist tradition (Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite): a Jesus-centered reading with the Sermon on the Mount as normative, believers' baptism, nonviolence and nonresistance, simple living, communal discernment, and the church as a visible community distinct from worldly power.
Immediate meaning — Mark 9 narrates the Transfiguration, where Jesus' divine sonship is declared with a heavenly command to 'hear him,' while Moses and Elijah stand beside him. It proceeds to an exorcism of a severely afflicted boy, highlighting the necessity of faith, prayer, and fasting. Jesus then predicts his suffering, death, and resurrection, which the disciples misunderstand, leading them to argue over who is the greatest among them. Jesus radically redefines greatness, stating that the first must become the 'last of all, and servant of all,' and illustrates this by welcoming a child. He rebukes sectarianism by telling the disciples not to stop an unauthorized exorcist. The chapter concludes with severe warnings against causing 'little ones' to stumble, using hyperbolic imagery of bodily amputation to stress the absolute gravity of excising sin, and ends with a call to retain one's 'salt' and live in peace with one another.
Reception — In Anabaptist theology, Mark 9 provides crucial texts for a Christocentric hermeneutic and the ethics of nonviolent servanthood. The Father's voice at the Transfiguration, commanding the disciples to listen to Jesus while Moses and Elijah fade from view (Mark 9:7), is foundational for how the tradition reads the Bible. Stuart Murray (*Biblical Interpretation in the Anabaptist Tradition*) notes that Anabaptists use this narrative to insist that the Old Testament (representing the Law and the Prophets) must be subordinated to and interpreted through the life and teachings of Jesus. This allowed early Anabaptists to reject magisterial Protestant justifications for state violence or warfare that relied on Old Testament precedents, asserting that the church must follow the peaceful Christ above all. Furthermore, Jesus' teaching that the first must be last and servant of all (Mark 9:35) forms the bedrock of Anabaptist ecclesiology and social ethics. John Howard Yoder (*The Politics of Jesus*) highlights this redefinition of greatness as a conscious rejection of worldly, coercive power, replacing it with an ethic of voluntary submission and cross-bearing (*Gelassenheit*). The dramatic commands to excise causes of stumbling (Mark 9:43-47) are read not as literal self-mutilation, but as underlining the radical cost of discipleship (*Nachfolge*) and the necessity of communal purity. Finally, the concluding command to 'have peace one with another' (Mark 9:50) anchors the tradition's commitment to pacifism, nonresistance, and restorative community discipline.
Application — Anabaptists apply this chapter by organizing their communities around models of servant leadership rather than hierarchical, coercive power, viewing church leadership as a calling to wash feet and minister to the vulnerable. The command to 'hear him' reinforces a daily discipleship that actively obeys the Sermon on the Mount, refusing to dilute Jesus' peaceful commands with temporal philosophies or Old Testament precedents for war. The final verse's call to peace shapes the community's commitment to active nonviolence, conscientious objection, and internal reconciliation, practiced through communal discernment and mutual accountability.
Authorities named: Stuart Murray — Biblical Interpretation in the Anabaptist Tradition · John Howard Yoder — The Politics of Jesus
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ The command 'hear him' at the Transfiguration demonstrates that Jesus' authority
- ✓ True greatness in the kingdom is defined by becoming the 'servant of all,' which
- ✓ The call to 'have peace one with another' is a foundational directive for commun
- ✓ The severe warnings to cut off limbs that cause stumbling highlight the radical,
Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal tradition (Assemblies of God, Church of God, and kindred bodies): the present continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine healing, and expectancy of God's present action, read within Nicene Trinitarian faith. Do NOT attribute Word-of-Faith / prosperity or later neo-charismatic distinctives to classical Pentecostalism generally.
Immediate meaning — Mark 9 narrates Jesus' Transfiguration, followed immediately by his descent to confront a severely demonized boy whom his disciples could not deliver. Jesus casts out the spirit, explaining to the disciples the necessity of prayer for such exorcisms. He then predicts his death and resurrection, corrects the disciples' arguments over greatness by setting a child among them, addresses their sectarianism regarding an outside exorcist, and concludes with stark warnings about the reality of Gehenna and the necessity of radical spiritual amputation to avoid causing oneself or others to stumble.
Reception — Classical Pentecostals read Mark 9—particularly the deliverance of the demonized boy (vv. 14-29)—as a foundational text for understanding the continuation of the miraculous, the necessity of active faith, and the dynamics of spiritual warfare. Jesus’ declaration, 'all things are possible to him who believes' (v. 23), is a cornerstone for Pentecostal theology regarding divine healing and the expectation of God's present action. It establishes that the miraculous is accessed through expectant faith, while the father's response, 'help my unbelief' (v. 24), is embraced as an honest model of relying on Christ's compassion despite human frailty (William W. Menzies and Stanley M. Horton, 'Bible Doctrines: A Pentecostal Perspective'). The disciples' failure to cast out the 'dumb and deaf spirit' (v. 25) despite their prior commissioning (in Mark 6) illustrates that spiritual authority is not a static possession. Instead, it requires continuous relational dependence on God. Donald C. Stamps ('Full Life Study Bible') notes on verse 29 that overcoming severe demonic oppression requires believers to maintain heightened spiritual sensitivity and power through the disciplines of prayer and fasting. Additionally, Jesus' rebuke of John for stopping the unauthorized exorcist (vv. 38-40) is received as an endorsement of recognizing the Spirit's authentic work wherever Christ's name is exalted in power, promoting fellowship based on shared spiritual power rather than rigid organizational boundaries.
Application — The tradition applies this chapter directly to its ministry practices, expecting believers to pray for the sick and cast out demons in Jesus' name today. The necessity of 'prayer and fasting' (v. 29, referencing the textual variants heavily utilized in early Pentecostalism) is applied as a practical mandate for ministers and intercessors facing difficult cases of spiritual bondage or physical illness, serving to deepen dependence on the Holy Spirit rather than human technique. Pastors frequently use the father's cry (v. 24) to encourage congregants to bring their doubts and crises to Jesus without pretense to receive their miracle. Furthermore, the severe warnings about 'unquenchable fire' and the command to cut off the offending hand or eye (vv. 43-48) are preached as literal warnings about the reality of hell and applied as a call to radical sanctification. Pentecostals emphasize that to be effective vessels of the Holy Spirit's power, believers must maintain strict personal holiness and rigorously remove sources of sin.
Authorities named: William W. Menzies and Stanley M. Horton — Bible Doctrines: A Pentecostal Perspective · Donald C. Stamps — Full Life Study Bible
claim-level audit (4 checks)
- ✓ Miraculous healing and deliverance are accessed through active, expectant faith
- ✓ Spiritual authority to cast out demons is not static but requires ongoing relati
- ✓ The Holy Spirit's authentic work should be recognized and not forbidden, even wh
- ✓ Believers must practice radical sanctification and cut off sources of sin to avo
Seventh-day Adventistaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Seventh-day Adventist tradition: the seventh-day Sabbath, the great-controversy theme, conditional immortality, sanctuary theology, and a historicist reading of prophecy.
Immediate meaning — Mark 9 narrates the Transfiguration of Jesus, where he is revealed in glory alongside Moses and Elijah to Peter, James, and John. Following this revelation, Jesus descends the mountain to find his disciples failing to cast out a destructive spirit from a boy. Jesus heals the boy, predicting his own death and resurrection. The chapter concludes with teachings on humility, discipleship, and severe warnings to remove any cause of stumbling, using the imagery of Gehenna, unquenchable fire, and the undying worm.
Reception — Seventh-day Adventist reception of Mark 9 is heavily shaped by conditional immortality and the great-controversy theme. The appearance of Moses and Elijah at the Transfiguration (verses 4-5) is read distinctively. Because Adventists reject the concept of conscious disembodied souls, they emphasize that Moses was bodily resurrected and Elijah was bodily translated. Ellen G. White famously typified this scene as a miniature representation of the kingdom of glory: Moses represents the saints who will be resurrected at the Second Coming, while Elijah represents the righteous who will be translated without seeing death. The healing of the demon-possessed boy (verses 17-27) is viewed through the great-controversy lens as a vivid demonstration of Satan's intent to destroy humanity versus Christ's power to restore. Furthermore, the warnings about Gehenna, where the worm does not die and the fire is not quenched (verses 43-48), are central to Adventist defenses of annihilationism. Theologians like Samuele Bacchiocchi argue that 'unquenchable' describes a fire that cannot be extinguished until it has completely consumed its fuel, resulting in permanent destruction rather than eternal conscious torment, and that the undying worm imagery signifies total consumption of dead bodies.
Application — In application, Adventist pastors and educators frequently use the Transfiguration as a source of assurance regarding the Second Coming and the literal bodily resurrection of the dead. The narrative of the demoniac is applied to spiritual warfare, emphasizing that certain spiritual victories require absolute dependence on God through prayer. The severe warnings regarding the unquenchable fire are utilized in evangelistic seminars not to frighten hearers with eternal torture, but to highlight the final, complete eradication of sin and to underscore God's justice and ultimate mercy in destroying wickedness rather than perpetuating suffering.
Authorities named: Ellen G. White — The Desire of Ages · Samuele Bacchiocchi — Immortality or Resurrection? A Biblical Study on Human Nature and Destiny · Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, Vol. 5 — The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary
claim-level audit (8 checks)
- ✓ Jesus is transfigured and speaks with Moses and Elijah.
- ✓ Jesus casts out a violent demon that the disciples were unable to expel.
- ✓ Jesus warns that it is better to be maimed than to be cast into Gehenna where th
- ✓ Moses and Elijah represent the bodily resurrected and living translated saints a
- ✓ The demonic possession and Jesus' intervention represent the great controversy b
- ✓ The unquenchable fire and undying worm indicate complete annihilation of the wic
- ✓ The Transfiguration is preached as a miniature vision of the blessed hope and th
- ✓ The Gehenna passages are utilized in evangelism to teach God's justice in the fi
Restorationist / Churches of Christaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Restoration Movement tradition (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches — formally non-creedal): restore New Testament Christianity, 'speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent,' reading by direct command, apostolic example, and necessary inference; baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; the weekly Lord's Supper.
Immediate meaning — In its immediate narrative context, Mark 9 details Jesus's prediction of the imminent arrival of God's kingdom, followed by his transfiguration on a high mountain before Peter, James, and John, where he appears with Moses and Elijah and is affirmed by a heavenly voice. Returning to the other disciples, Jesus heals a severely demon-possessed boy whom they could not heal, emphasizing the necessity of faith and prayer. He then privately predicts his betrayal, death, and resurrection, though the disciples do not understand. The chapter concludes with Jesus teaching his disciples about true greatness being found in servanthood, correcting their sectarian attitude toward an unaffiliated exorcist, and issuing severe warnings against causing little ones to stumble and the eternal realities of Gehenna.
Reception — Within the Restoration Movement (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches), Mark 9 is a foundational chapter for establishing core ecclesiological and hermeneutical doctrines. Mark 9:1 is a primary proof text for the tradition's amillennial, realized eschatology. Because Jesus stated that some standing there would not taste death before the kingdom came with power, the tradition insists the kingdom cannot be a future, earthly millennial reign; rather, it was established in the first century, specifically on the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2, when the Holy Spirit descended with power. Foy E. Wallace Jr. and other apologists frequently utilized this verse to decisively refute dispensational premillennialism. Furthermore, the Transfiguration (Mark 9:2-8) is read as a crucial turning point in biblical authority. When Peter suggests building three tabernacles for Jesus, Moses, and Elijah, the overshadowing cloud and the divine voice commanding, 'This is my beloved Son. Listen to him,' followed by the disappearance of Moses and Elijah, is interpreted typologically. Moses represents the Law, and Elijah represents the Prophets. Their fading away, leaving 'Jesus only,' signifies the abrogation of the Old Covenant and the establishment of the New Covenant. J.W. McGarvey highlighted this passage to argue that the Old Testament, while inspired, is no longer binding for Christian faith and practice, cementing the tradition's commitment to seeking authority exclusively in the New Testament.
Application — In application, preachers and teachers in the Churches of Christ frequently use Mark 9:1 in evangelistic sermons to demonstrate that the church and the kingdom are identical, urging listeners to enter the kingdom that is already present through baptism for the remission of sins. The command 'Listen to him' (Mark 9:7) is continuously applied to hermeneutical debates, particularly to justify why Old Testament practices—such as mechanical instrumental music in worship, the burning of incense, or Sabbath-keeping—cannot be imported into the church; believers must find positive New Testament authorization for their practices. Additionally, the warnings about cutting off one's hand or foot (Mark 9:43-48) are applied literally regarding the eternality of hell and the absolute necessity of personal holiness and church discipline, while the narrative of the unaffiliated exorcist (Mark 9:38-40) continues to prompt internal reflection on the boundaries of fellowship and the historic tension between the movement's early unity impulses and its later exclusivity.
Authorities named: Foy E. Wallace Jr. — God's Prophetic Word · J.W. McGarvey — The Fourfold Gospel
claim-level audit (5 checks)
- ✓ The kingdom of God is not a future millennial reign but a present reality establ
- ✓ The departure of Moses and Elijah and the voice commanding the disciples to list
- ✓ Old Testament practices cannot be used to authorize New Testament church worship
- ✓ Sectarian exclusivity is challenged by Christ's acceptance of those who work in
- ✓ The physical and eternal reality of Gehenna necessitates strict adherence to mor
Step 3Non-voting panels and comparative appendix
These inform the notes and the rendering, and are reported here, but they are never counted in the vote.
Academic textual-historical analysisaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Academic textual-historical analysis: philology and the original-language text, textual criticism, ancient Near Eastern (and, for the NT, Greco-Roman) context, literary genre and form, composition and dating debates, and reception history. Describe scholarly positions and their evidence without confessional commitment. This panel informs the textual notes and the rendering; it is never a church vote.
Immediate meaning — Mark 9 continues the narrative of Jesus's Galilean ministry with a series of dramatic revelations and instructions. The chapter begins with Jesus taking Peter, James, and John up a high mountain, where his appearance is transformed to blinding white, and he is seen talking with Moses and Elijah. A voice from an overshadowing cloud identifies Jesus as the beloved Son. After descending, Jesus and the disciples discuss Elijah's return before encountering a crowd where the other disciples have failed to exorcise a spirit from a boy. Jesus rebukes the generation, heals the boy, and privately explains the necessity of prayer. The narrative then shifts to Jesus's second prediction of his death and resurrection, which the disciples do not understand. In Capernaum, Jesus addresses their private argument over greatness by using a child to illustrate that the first must be the servant of all. The chapter concludes with a series of teachings warning against exclusionary behavior, severely cautioning against causing little ones to stumble, and describing the unquenchable fire of Gehenna, finishing with exhortations regarding salt and peace.
Reception — Within the academic and textual-historical tradition, this chapter is a primary site for source, form, and textual criticism. Textual critics note significant manuscript variations: the phrase 'and fasting' in verse 29 is absent from the earliest Alexandrian witnesses (such as Codex Vaticanus and the original hand of Sinaiticus), which Bruce M. Metzger identifies as a later scribal addition reflecting early church ascetic practices. Similarly, verses 44 and 46 are widely regarded as later scribal insertions meant to harmonize the text with verse 48 and Isaiah 66:24, as they are missing from the earliest manuscripts. Form critically, the Transfiguration has been heavily debated; Rudolf Bultmann argued it possesses the literary markers of a misplaced post-resurrection appearance that was later retrojected into the earthly ministry of Jesus, though others analyze it as an apocalyptic anticipation heavily reliant on Sinai theophany typology (such as the cloud and the six days). Furthermore, redaction critics like Vincent Taylor point out that the concluding discourse (verses 37-50) shows clear signs of editorial composition, where originally independent sayings of Jesus were strung together using mnemonic 'catchword' linkages—connecting 'in my name,' 'stumble,' 'fire,' and 'salt.'
Application — Historical-critical application uses this chapter to reconstruct both the theology of the Markan community and the transmission of the Jesus tradition. Scholars apply the motif of the disciples' continuous failure—their inability to heal the boy, their misunderstanding of the passion prediction, and their argument over greatness—to understand Mark's pastoral or apologetic aims. This is typically read as the evangelist's critique of a triumphalist 'divine man' (theios aner) Christology in his own community, countering it with a strict theology of the cross and suffering discipleship.
Authorities named: Bruce M. Metzger — A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament · Rudolf Bultmann — The History of the Synoptic Tradition · Vincent Taylor — The Gospel According to St. Mark
claim-level audit (6 checks)
- ✓ The text plainly narrates Jesus being transformed in appearance on a mountain an
- ✓ The text recounts Jesus delivering a second prediction of his betrayal, death, a
- ✓ Textual criticism demonstrates that the words 'and fasting' and the entirety of
- ✓ The concluding discourse is analyzed as a compilation of independent sayings sti
- ✓ The Transfiguration is widely debated in form criticism as potentially being a r
- ✓ Scholars utilize the disciples' repeated failures and misunderstandings to recon
Jewish interpretationthin materialaudit ✓
Lens given to the model: Jewish interpretation of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible books only; do not treat the New Testament as Scripture, and address it only historically if at all). Distinguish rabbinic (Talmud, Midrash), medieval (Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and the classical mefarshim), and modern (including critical and denominational) voices rather than presenting one uniform Jewish position. This panel informs, and is reported, but never a Christian church vote.
Immediate meaning — In its immediate historical setting, this text describes a first-century Galilean Jewish teacher undergoing a visionary transformation alongside Moses and Elijah, healing an afflicted boy, and imparting moral instruction to his disciples. The narrative portrays these Jewish figures debating eschatological timelines, the impending suffering of the righteous, and the strict demands of communal discipleship using severe metaphors of bodily discipline.
Reception — Because Mark is a New Testament book, normative Judaism does not receive it as Scripture. Consequently, classical rabbinic and medieval Jewish commentators (such as Rashi or Ramban) do not exegete this text. However, modern Jewish scholars of the New Testament study this chapter to reconstruct first-century Jewish beliefs and trace the parting of the ways between Judaism and early Christianity. The disciples' question regarding the scribes' teaching that 'Elijah must first come' (Mark 9:11) is understood by scholars like Claude Montefiore to be rooted in Jewish interpretations of Malachi's prophecy (Malachi 3:23-24 in the Tanakh) concerning the Day of the Lord. In rabbinic literature, Elijah's return is highly anticipated as a time when he will resolve halakhic disputes and restore social order (e.g., Mishnah Eduyot 8:7). Furthermore, Peter's desire to construct three 'tabernacles' or 'tents' (Mark 9:5) is frequently analyzed by modern historical-critical scholars as invoking the eschatological imagery of Sukkot (the Feast of Tabernacles). The vivid warnings concerning Gehenna (Mark 9:43-48) are read in 'The Jewish Annotated New Testament' as a reflection of Second Temple Jewish thought, wherein the Valley of Hinnom transitioned from a geographical location into a metaphor for eschatological punishment, explicitly quoting the concluding verse of the Book of Isaiah (Isaiah 66:24) regarding the undying worm and unquenchable fire.
Application — Judaism does not apply this chapter theologically, liturgically, or halakhically. Its application is strictly limited to historical, academic, and comparative study by Jewish historians seeking to understand the diverse landscape of Second Temple Judaism and the historical Jesus.
Authorities named: Claude Montefiore — The Synoptic Gospels · Amy-Jill Levine and Marc Zvi Brettler (eds.) — The Jewish Annotated New Testament · Judah ha-Nasi (compiler) — Mishnah Eduyot
claim-level audit (3 checks)
- ✓ The disciples' questioning about the necessity of Elijah coming first is rooted
- ✓ The proposal to build three tabernacles is historically analyzed as invoking the
- ✓ The teaching regarding Gehenna, the unquenchable fire, and the undying worm dire
Comparative appendix — outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster (Latter-day Saint, Jehovah's Witnesses)
Latter-day Saint
Lens given to the model: Latter-day Saint reading (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints): the Bible read alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, with living prophets and continuing revelation, and the Joseph Smith Translation where relevant. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Immediate meaning — In Mark 9, Jesus reveals his divine glory on the Mount of Transfiguration, converses with Moses and Elijah, and casts out a severe deaf and dumb spirit after his disciples fail. He predicts his death and resurrection, and concludes by teaching his disciples that true greatness requires humility, and that they must radically separate themselves from causes of offense.
Reception — Latter-day Saint reception of Mark 9 is heavily shaped by the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) and the doctrine of priesthood keys. The Transfiguration is understood not only as a revelation of divine glory but as the specific occasion where Peter, James, and John received priesthood keys from Moses and Elijah to govern the Church. The JST significantly alters the discourse on Elias, distinguishing between an Elias who acts as a forerunner and an Elias who restores all things. Furthermore, the JST reinterprets Jesus's commands to cut off an offending hand, foot, or eye. Instead of physical self-mutilation, the JST explains these body parts as metaphors for close associates or family members who lead one into sin, teaching that it is better to sever ties with a sinning brother than to be led into destruction.
Application — In Latter-day Saint application, the chapter provides key models for faith and priesthood administration. The father's cry to help his unbelief is frequently cited by modern apostles as the ideal response to doubt, encouraging members to hold fast to existing faith while seeking divine assistance for their uncertainties. Jesus's teaching that certain spirits require prayer and fasting is applied practically to the administration of the Melchizedek Priesthood, instructing members that intense spiritual preparation is sometimes required to draw upon God's healing power.
Authorities named: Joseph Smith — Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible · Joseph Smith — History of the Church · Jeffrey R. Holland — Lord, I Believe (April 2013 General Conference)
Jehovah's Witnesses
Lens given to the model: Jehovah's Witness reading (Watch Tower Society): attention to the divine name, God's Kingdom as a real government, conditional immortality, and a non-Trinitarian Christology. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Immediate meaning — In Mark 9, Jesus declares that some standing with him will not taste death before seeing the Kingdom of God come in power. Six days later, he is transfigured before Peter, James, and John. His garments become brilliantly white, and Moses and Elijah appear talking with him. A voice from a cloud declares Jesus to be the beloved Son. Returning to the other disciples, Jesus heals a boy with a deaf and mute spirit after the disciples fail, emphasizing the necessity of faith and prayer. He foretells his death and resurrection, though the disciples do not understand. When the disciples argue over greatness, Jesus places a child among them, teaching that the greatest must be a servant to all. He warns severely against stumbling others or oneself, using the imagery of cutting off body parts to avoid being cast into Gehenna, described as a place where the worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.
Reception — For Jehovah's Witnesses, Mark 9 is a vital chapter for eschatology, Christology, and the doctrine of conditional immortality. The Watch Tower Society teaches that Jesus’ promise in verse 1—that some would see the Kingdom of God coming in power—was directly fulfilled in the Transfiguration (verses 2-8). This event is understood not merely as a miracle, but as a visionary 'foregleam' of Christ's future presence in Kingdom glory, a heavenly government Witnesses believe was established in 1914. The voice from the overshadowing cloud (verse 7) is identified specifically as Jehovah God speaking directly from heaven. Because Jehovah speaks of Jesus as His 'beloved Son,' Witnesses read this as a clear demonstration of their non-Trinitarian Christology: Jehovah and Jesus are distinct entities, with the Son being completely subordinate to the Father. The chapter's conclusion is heavily emphasized in Jehovah's Witness apologetics against the doctrine of hellfire. The references to 'Gehenna' and the unquenchable fire where 'their worm dieth not' (verses 43-48) are read through the historical context of the Valley of Hinnom outside Jerusalem. The Watch Tower Society explains this was a literal garbage dump where fires were kept burning to consume refuse and the dead bodies of criminals deemed unworthy of a resurrection. Therefore, the fire and worms represent complete, eternal destruction (annihilation) rather than conscious eternal torment. The worms consume what the fire does not, signifying total eradication.
Application — Jehovah's Witnesses apply the Transfiguration account to bolster faith in the reality of the established heavenly Kingdom, viewing the vision as a guarantee of Christ's current and future royal power. Mark 9:43-48 serves as a cornerstone in their field ministry for dismantling the traditional doctrine of hell. Publishers use these verses to assure the public that Jehovah is a God of love who does not torture humans, but rather permanently destroys the hopelessly wicked. Additionally, Jesus’ counsel on humility and his warning against stumbling 'little ones' (verses 35-42) are applied strictly within the congregation; elders and members are frequently urged to view themselves as 'lesser ones' and to avoid any conduct that might cause a fellow believer to lose faith or leave the truth.
Authorities named: Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — The Watchtower
Step 4Establish the original-language basis
The rendering is built from the source text, not from the English majority.
Textual basis — The provided Greek text corresponds to the Byzantine / Textus Receptus tradition, characterized by the inclusion of Several Major Additions absent from the Alexandrian (Critical) text (e.g., Mark 9:44 and 46).
Divine names — Theos (God), Kyrios (Lord)
- v3: The phrase 'ὡς χιών' (as snow) is included in this text but omitted in many Alexandrian manuscripts.
- v23: The word 'πιστεῦσαι' (to believe) is included here ('if you are able to believe'), whereas some critical editions read simply 'τὸ εἰ δύνῃ' (the 'If you are able').
- v24: The text includes 'μετὰ δακρύων' (with tears) and the divine address 'κύριε' (Lord), both of which are absent in early Alexandrian witnesses.
- v29: The phrase 'καὶ νηστείᾳ' (and fasting) is present here but omitted in some early manuscripts like Sinaiticus and Vaticanus.
- v38: The phrase 'ὃς οὐκ ἀκολουθεῖ ἡμῖν' is included; some manuscripts omit one of the two occurrences of this phrase in the verse.
- v40: The text reads 'ἡμῶν' (us) twice, whereas many manuscripts read 'ὑμῶν' (you).
- v44: Verse 44 is included in this text but omitted entirely in critical texts based on Alexandrian manuscripts.
- v46: Verse 46 is included in this text but omitted entirely in critical texts based on Alexandrian manuscripts.
- v49: The second clause 'καὶ πᾶσα θυσία ἁλὶ ἁλισθήσεται' (and every sacrifice will be salted with salt) is included here, but missing from several early manuscripts.
- v1: Interjection (ἀμὴν); definite article pattern (τῶν ἑστηκότων οἵτινες); divine name (θεοῦ).
- v2: Repeated definite article before each proper noun (τὸν Πέτρον καὶ τὸν Ἰάκωβον καὶ τὸν Ἰωάννην).
- v3: Alliteration of lambda (λευκὰ λίαν).
- v4: Number shift: a singular verb (ὤφθη) is used with a compound subject, followed immediately by a plural verb (ἦσαν).
- v5: Interjection (ῥαββί); repetition of 'μίαν' (one) three times.
- v6: Repetition of the particle 'γὰρ' (for) to explain Peter's condition.
- v7: Repetition of 'νεφέλη' (cloud); definite article pattern marking the Son (ὁ υἱός μου ὁ ἀγαπητός).
- v8: Double negative yielding assonance (οὐκέτι οὐδένα).
- v9: Definite article pattern establishing the title (ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου).
- v10: Definite article substantivizing an entire infinitive phrase (τὸ ἐκ νεκρῶν ἀναστῆναι).
- v11: Repetition of 'ὅτι'.
- v12: Alliteration of pi (πάντα... πῶς... πολλὰ πάθῃ).
- v13: Repetition/refrain matching verse 12 (καθὼς γέγραπται).
- v14: Repetition of the pronoun 'αὐτούς'.
- v15: Number shift: a singular collective noun (πᾶς ὁ ὄχλος) takes a plural participle (ἰδόντες) and a plural verb (ἐξεθαμβήθησαν).
- v16: Repetition of the phrase 'συζητεῖτε πρὸς αὐτούς' connecting back to the narrative of verse 14.
- v17: Interjection (διδάσκαλε).
- v18: Rhyme / Assonance (ἀφρίζει καὶ τρίζει); repetition of pronoun (αὐτὸν... αὐτόν... αὐτοῦ).
- v19: Interjection (ὦ); refrain/repetition (ἕως πότε... ἕως πότε).
- v20: Definite article pattern (τὸ πνεῦμα); participle sequence detailing action (ἰδὼν... πεσὼν).
- v21: Pleonastic prepositional phrase (ἐκ παιδιόθεν - literally 'from from-a-child').
- v22: Parallelism (καὶ εἰς τὸ πῦρ... καὶ εἰς ὕδατα).
- v23: Definite article quoting the father's exact phrase (τὸ εἰ δύνῃ); cognates (δύνῃ/δυνατὰ and πιστεῦσαι/πιστεύοντι).
- v24: Divine name address (κύριε); cognate contrast (πιστεύω / ἀπιστίᾳ).
- v25: Definite article pattern sandwiching the adjectives (τὸ ἄλαλον καὶ κωφὸν τὸ πνεῦμα); cognate contrast between verbs (ἔξελθε / εἰσέλθῃς).
- v26: Rhyme / Assonance (κράξας καὶ πολλὰ σπαράξας).
- v27: Repeated redundant pronoun sequence typical of Markan style (αὐτοῦ... αὐτόν).
- v28: Emphatic pronoun usage (ὅτι ἡμεῖς οὐκ).
- v29: Demonstrative and definite article pattern (τοῦτο τὸ γένος).
- v30: Particle conjunction indicating purpose (ἵνα).
- v31: Cognate repetition of the verb 'to kill' (ἀποκτενοῦσιν / ἀποκτανθεὶς).
- v32: Definite article pattern (τὸ ῥῆμα).
- v33: Repetition establishing a setting phrase (ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ).
- v34: Repetition echoing the phrase from the previous verse (ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ).
- v35: Chiasm / Contrast (πρῶτος / ἔσχατος); repetition of 'πάντων'.
- v36: Repetition of the pronoun object in sequential clauses (αὐτὸ... αὐτῶν... αὐτὸ... αὐτοῖς).
- v37: Repetition of the verb 'δέχομαι' (to receive) five times.
- v38: Interjection (διδάσκαλε); repetition (οὐκ ἀκολουθεῖ ἡμῖν / οὐκ ἠκολούθει ἡμῖν).
- v39: Cognate construction (δύναμιν / δυνήσεται).
- v40: Chiasm / Contrast involving spatial prepositions (καθ᾽ ἡμῶν / ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν).
- v41: Interjection (ἀμὴν).
- v42: Repetition (initiating the structural series of 'σκανδαλίσῃ').
- v43: Repetition establishing the structural warning formula (σκανδαλίζῃ; εἰς τὴν ζωὴν; τὸ πῦρ τὸ ἄσβεστον).
- v44: Refrain structure (ὅπου ὁ σκώληξ αὐτῶν οὐ τελευτᾷ καὶ τὸ πῦρ οὐ σβέννυται).
- v45: Repetition mirroring verse 43 structurally (σκανδαλίζῃ; εἰς τὴν ζωὴν; τὸ πῦρ τὸ ἄσβεστον).
- v46: Refrain structure identical to verse 44 (ὅπου ὁ σκώληξ αὐτῶν οὐ τελευτᾷ καὶ τὸ πῦρ οὐ σβέννυται).
- v47: Repetition of the structural warning formula (σκανδαλίζῃ); divine name (θεοῦ).
- v48: Refrain structure identical to verses 44 and 46 (ὅπου ὁ σκώληξ αὐτῶν οὐ τελευτᾷ καὶ τὸ πῦρ οὐ σβέννυται).
- v49: Cognate / figura-etymologica (ἁλισθήσεται / ἁλὶ); repetition (πᾶς / πᾶσα).
- v50: Cognate wordplay (ἅλας / ἄναλον / ἅλα); parallel structure (ἐν ἑαυτοῖς / ἐν ἀλλήλοις).
Step 5Compare the translations, verse by verse
Each difference classified: textual · lexical · grammatical · interpretive · stylistic (the last only where it changes meaning).
- grammaticalv1 (vv 1, 4, 29, 31) choice of preposition for addressing someone — “to” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto” (KJV, ASV)
- lexicalv1 translation of the solemn affirmation — “Verily” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Most certainly” (WEB) vs “Amen” (DRC)
- lexicalv1 (vv 1, 13, 41) phrasing of speaking to the audience — “say unto” (KJV, ASV, DARBY) vs “to” (YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “tell” (WEB)
- grammaticalv1 choice of temporal preposition — “till” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “until” (WEB, DARBY)
- grammaticalv2 tense of the verb for taking along — “taketh with him” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “took” (WEB) vs “take” (YLT) vs “takes” (DARBY)
- lexicalv2 translation of the verb for leading or bringing — “leadeth” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “bringeth” (ASV, YLT) vs “brought” (WEB) vs “takes” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv2 choice of preposition for going up the mountain — “into an” (KJV, DRC) vs “onto a” (WEB) vs “a” (ASV) vs “to a” (YLT) vs “on a” (DARBY) vs “upon a” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv3 translation of the word for clothing — “garments” (ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “raiment” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “clothing” (WEB)
- lexicalv3 phrasing and synonyms for the shining garments — “shining exceeding” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “glistening exceedingly” (WEB) vs “glistering” (ASV) vs “glittering” (YLT) vs “and” (DRC)
- grammaticalv4 use of expletive subject 'there' to introduce the appearance — “there” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Moses” (WEB)
- lexicalv5 transliteration vs translation of the respectful title — “Rabbi” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “Master” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv5 phrasing of the infinitive clause for being good — “for us to” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “to” (YLT) vs “that we should” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv5 phrasing of the proposal to make tents — “and let us” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Let’s” (WEB) vs “we may” (YLT)
- lexicalv5 spelling and transliteration of the prophet's name — “Elijah” (WEB, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “Elias” (KJV, DRC) vs “Elijah one” (YLT) vs “one” (DARBY)
- lexicalv6 translation of the verb for knowing — “knew” (ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “didn’t know” (WEB) vs “wist not” (KJV) vs “was knowing” (YLT)
- textualv6 textual variant between speaking and answering — “to say” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER) vs “answer” (ASV) vs “he might” (YLT) vs “he should” (DARBY) vs “he said” (DRC)
- lexicalv6 phrasing of the degree of their fear — “very” (WEB) vs “were sore afraid” (KJV) vs “became” (ASV) vs “greatly” (YLT) vs “filled with fear” (DARBY) vs “greatly terrified” (WEBSTER) vs “struck with fear” (DRC)
- grammaticalv7 phrasing of the action of the cloud — “overshadowing” (ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “that overshadowed” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “came overshadowing” (WEB)
- grammaticalv7 phrasing of the command to listen — “hear” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “ye” (ASV, DRC) vs “Listen to” (WEB) vs “the Beloved ye” (YLT)
- lexicalv8 translation of the indefinite pronoun for no one — “man” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “one” (ASV, YLT) vs “one with them” (WEB) vs “longer saw” (DARBY)
- lexicalv8 phrasing of the exception — “more save” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “but” (YLT, DRC) vs “except” (WEB) vs “one but” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv9 tense of the verb for descending — “came down” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “were coming” (WEB, ASV) vs “are coming” (YLT) vs “descended” (DARBY)
- lexicalv9 translation of the verb for instructing or commanding — “charged” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “commanded” (WEB)
- grammaticalv9 phrasing of the temporal clause for 'until' — “had seen till” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “until after” (WEB) vs “save when” (ASV) vs “saw except when” (YLT) vs “unless when” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv9 phrasing and tense of rising from the dead — “were risen from” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “had” (WEB) vs “should have again” (ASV) vs “may rise out of” (YLT) vs “should be among” (DARBY) vs “shall be again” (DRC)
- grammaticalv11 phrasing of the disciples' question — “do” (WEB, DARBY) vs “Why say” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “How is it that” (ASV) vs “that” (YLT) vs “then do” (DRC)
- grammaticalv12 phrasing of the prophet's coming — “Elijah indeed comes” (WEB) vs “Elias verily cometh” (KJV) vs “Elijah indeed” (ASV) vs “Elijah indeed having come” (YLT) vs “indeed having” (DARBY) vs “Elijah” (WEBSTER) vs “when he shall come” (DRC)
- grammaticalv12 tense and mood of the verb for restoring — “and restoreth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “restores” (WEB) vs “doth restore” (YLT) vs “come restores” (DARBY) vs “shall restore” (DRC)
- grammaticalv12 phrasing of the reference to what is written — “it” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “and how it is” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “hath been” (YLT) vs “as” (DRC)
- grammaticalv12 (vv 12, 13) choice of preposition for 'concerning' — “of” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “concerning” (YLT, WEBSTER) vs “about” (WEB)
- lexicalv12 translation of the verb for being treated with contempt — “set at nought” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “despised” (WEB, DRC) vs “naught” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv13 word order and phrasing of the prophet having come — “Elijah” (ASV, WEBSTER) vs “also” (DARBY, DRC) vs “Elijah has” (WEB) vs “Elias is indeed” (KJV) vs “also Elijah hath” (YLT)
- grammaticalv13 phrasing of the action done to the prophet — “to” (DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “also to” (WEB) vs “have done unto” (KJV) vs “also” (ASV) vs “did to” (YLT)
- lexicalv13 choice of relative pronoun — “whatever” (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “whatsoever” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “what” (YLT)
- lexicalv13 translation of the verb for wanting or willing — “would” (DARBY, DRC) vs “wanted to even” (WEB) vs “listed” (KJV) vs “would even” (ASV) vs “willed” (YLT) vs “pleased” (WEBSTER)
- textualv14 textual variant between singular and plural pronoun for who came — “he” (WEB, KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “they” (ASV)
- lexicalv14 translation of the preposition for 'around' — “multitude about” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “around” (WEB) vs “crowd around” (DARBY)
- lexicalv15 translation of the adverb for 'immediately' — “Immediately” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “And straightway” (KJV, ASV) vs “presently” (DRC)
- lexicalv15 translation of the verb for greeting — “to him saluted” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “greeted” (WEB) vs “near were saluting” (YLT) vs “they” (DRC)
- textualv16 textual variant explicitly naming the scribes versus a pronoun — “asked the scribes” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER) vs “them” (ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “questioned” (YLT)
- grammaticalv17 choice of relative pronoun introducing the son's condition — “who has” (WEB, DARBY) vs “who” (ASV, WEBSTER) vs “which hath” (KJV) vs “unto thee having” (YLT) vs “to thee having” (DRC)
- lexicalv17 translation of the spirit's inability to speak — “dumb” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “mute” (WEB)
- grammaticalv18 phrasing of whenever the spirit takes hold — “wherever it seizes” (WEB) vs “And wheresoever he taketh” (KJV) vs “it” (ASV) vs “wherever it doth seize” (YLT) vs “it seizes” (DARBY) vs “wherever” (WEBSTER) vs “Who” (DRC)
- lexicalv18 translation of the spirit's violent action — “he teareth” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “it throws” (WEB) vs “it dasheth” (ASV) vs “it doth tear” (YLT) vs “it tears” (DARBY) vs “dasheth” (DRC)
- lexicalv18 translation of the symptom of becoming rigid or withering — “pineth away and” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “becomes rigid” (WEB) vs “he is withering” (DARBY)
- lexicalv18 translation of the verb for speaking or asking — “spake to thy” (KJV, ASV, YLT) vs “spoke” (DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “asked your” (WEB)
- grammaticalv18 phrasing of the purpose clause to cast it out — “that they should” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “to” (WEB, DRC) vs “may” (YLT) vs “might” (DARBY)
- interpretivev18 (vv 18, 28) pronoun gender used for the spirit — “him” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “it” (WEB, ASV, YLT)
- grammaticalv18 phrasing of the inability to cast out the spirit — “could not” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “were able” (ASV, YLT) vs “weren’t able” (WEB)
- lexicalv19 translation of the verb for putting up with — “suffer” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “bear with” (WEB, ASV, DARBY)
- grammaticalv19 choice of preposition for bringing him — “unto” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DRC) vs “to” (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv20 phrasing of the temporal clause upon seeing him — “when he saw” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “having seen” (YLT) vs “seeing” (DARBY) vs “had seen” (DRC)
- lexicalv20 translation of the spirit convulsing him — “tare” (KJV, ASV, YLT) vs “convulsed” (WEB) vs “immediately tore” (DARBY) vs “tore” (WEBSTER) vs “troubled” (DRC)
- grammaticalv20 phrasing of falling to the ground — “he fell on” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “having fallen upon” (YLT) vs “falling upon” (DARBY) vs “being thrown down upon” (DRC)
- lexicalv20 translation of wallowing on the ground — “ground and wallowed” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “wallowing” (WEB) vs “earth was wallowing” (YLT) vs “earth he rolled” (DARBY) vs “he rolled about” (DRC)
- grammaticalv21 phrasing of the duration of time — “time” (ASV, YLT, DRC) vs “is” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “has” (WEB) vs “a time” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv21 phrasing of the onset of the condition — “to” (YLT, WEBSTER) vs “has been happening to” (WEB) vs “came unto” (KJV) vs “hath come” (ASV) vs “with” (DARBY) vs “hath happened” (DRC)
- lexicalv21 translation of the phase of life 'childhood' — “From childhood” (WEB, YLT, DARBY) vs “From” (ASV, WEBSTER) vs “Of a child” (KJV) vs “From his infancy” (DRC)
- lexicalv22 phrasing of the frequency 'often' — “Often has” (WEB, DARBY) vs “And ofttimes it hath” (KJV, ASV) vs “many times also” (YLT) vs “often” (WEBSTER) vs “oftentimes he” (DRC)
- grammaticalv22 phrasing of the conditional 'if you can' — “thou canst” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you can” (WEB) vs “art able to” (YLT) vs “couldst” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv23 choice of preposition for speaking to someone — “to” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “said unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “saith to” (DRC)
- grammaticalv23 phrasing of the one who believes — “him that believeth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “who believes” (WEB) vs “the one is believing” (YLT) vs “believes” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv24 phrasing of the father crying out — “child cried” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “having” (YLT) vs “young crying” (DARBY) vs “boy crying” (DRC)
- lexicalv25 translation of the word for 'unclean' — “unclean” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “foul” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- lexicalv25 translation of the command to come out — “charge thee come” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “command” (ASV, DARBY) vs “command you” (WEB) vs “forth” (YLT) vs “command go” (DRC)
- grammaticalv25 phrasing of the prohibition to enter again — “enter no more into” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “never” (WEB) vs “thou mayest enter” (YLT) vs “not any” (DRC)
- grammaticalv26 phrasing of the spirit crying out — “And the spirit cried” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “having out” (ASV, DARBY) vs “After crying out” (WEB) vs “having” (YLT) vs “crying out” (DRC)
- lexicalv26 translation of the severe convulsing — “rent” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “torn” (ASV, DARBY) vs “convulsing” (WEB) vs “greatly tearing” (DRC)
- lexicalv26 translation of the resultative conjunction — “so” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “insomuch” (KJV, ASV) vs “so much” (WEB)
- interpretivev26 translation of the group who thought he was dead — “many” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “most of them” (WEB) vs “the more part” (ASV) vs “the most” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv27 phrasing of taking him by the hand — “took” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “having taken” (YLT) vs “having taken hold of” (DARBY) vs “taking” (DRC)
- grammaticalv28 tense of entering the house — “was come” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “had” (WEB, WEBSTER) vs “having” (YLT) vs “entered” (DARBY)
- lexicalv28 translation of asking privately — “asked” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “were questioning” (YLT) vs “secretly” (DRC)
- lexicalv29 phrasing of the spirit coming out — “out” (WEB, ASV) vs “can come forth by” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “go out” (DARBY, DRC) vs “is able to with” (YLT)
- lexicalv29 translation of the preposition 'except' — “but by” (WEB, KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “save” (ASV) vs “except with” (YLT)
- textualv31 textual variant in the connective conjunction 'for' vs 'and' — “For” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “And” (DRC)
- grammaticalv31 tense of the verb for teaching — “taught” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “was teaching” (WEB, YLT)
- grammaticalv31 singular vs plural for disciples — “disciples” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “disciple” (DRC)
- lexicalv31 translation of being delivered or handed over — “is delivered into the” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “being handed over to” (WEB) vs “up” (ASV) vs “being to” (YLT) vs “men's” (DARBY) vs “shall be betrayed” (DRC)
- grammaticalv31 choice of future auxiliary — “shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “will” (WEB, WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv31 phrasing of the temporal sequence of being killed — “after that he is” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “when” (WEB, ASV) vs “having been” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv32 translation of the saying or word they didn't understand — “understood not that saying” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “the” (ASV, DARBY) vs “didn’t understand the” (WEB) vs “were understanding the” (YLT) vs “the word” (DRC)
- grammaticalv32 phrasing of their fear to ask — “were afraid” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “they” (YLT, DRC) vs “feared” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv33 phrasing of being in the house — “being” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “when he was” (WEB, ASV) vs “when they were” (DRC)
- lexicalv34 choice of contrastive conjunction — “But” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “and” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv34 translation of the idiom for remaining silent — “held their peace” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “were silent” (WEB, YLT) vs “remained silent” (DARBY)
- stylisticv35 inclusion or omission of connective for sitting down — “and” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “he” (YLT, DARBY, DRC)
- grammaticalv35 phrasing of speaking to the twelve — “to” (WEBSTER, DRC) vs “he said to” (WEB) vs “saith unto” (KJV) vs “he” (ASV) vs “he to” (YLT) vs “he says to” (DARBY)
- lexicalv35 translation of the desire to be first — “man desire to” (KJV, DRC) vs “wants” (WEB) vs “would” (ASV) vs “doth will” (YLT) vs “one would” (DARBY) vs “desireth” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv35 phrasing of the pronoun for 'he' — “he” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “the same” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- lexicalv35 translation of the word for servant or minister — “servant” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “minister” (YLT, DARBY) vs “the minister” (DRC)
- stylisticv36 inclusion or omission of connective before taking the child — “and” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “he” (YLT, DARBY, DRC)
- grammaticalv36 gender of the pronoun for the child — “him” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “it” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv37 phrasing of the relative clause for receiving — “Whosoever shall receive” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “Whoever receives” (WEB) vs “Whoever may” (YLT) vs “Whoever” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv37 translation of 'child' vs 'little child' — “children” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “little” (ASV, DARBY) vs “little child” (WEB) vs “child as this” (DRC)
- grammaticalv37 conjugation of the verb for receiving — “receiveth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “receives” (WEB, DARBY) vs “doth receive” (YLT)
- grammaticalv37 phrasing of the second clause for receiving — “whosoever shall receive” (KJV, DARBY, DRC) vs “whoever receives” (WEB) vs “receiveth” (ASV) vs “whoever may” (YLT) vs “whoever” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv37 phrasing of the negative clause for not receiving — “receiveth not” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “doesn’t receive” (WEB) vs “doth receive” (YLT) vs “does receive” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv37 choice of relative pronoun — “that” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “who” (WEB, YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv38 translation of answering or saying — “answered” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “said to” (WEB) vs “said unto” (ASV) vs “did answer” (YLT)
- textualv38 textual variant including 'saying' with the respectful title — “Teacher” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “saying Master” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
- grammaticalv38 (vv 38, 43, 45, 47) choice of possessive pronoun — “thy” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “your” (WEB)
- grammaticalv39 phrasing of the relative clause for doing miracles — “who” (ASV, WEBSTER) vs “one who” (YLT, DARBY) vs “one who will” (WEB) vs “man which shall do” (KJV) vs “that doth” (DRC)
- lexicalv39 translation of the term for miracles or mighty works — “miracle” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “mighty work” (WEB, ASV, YLT)
- lexicalv39 translation of speaking evil or ill — “evil” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “ill” (DARBY, DRC)
- grammaticalv40 phrasing of the relative pronoun 'whoever' — “he that” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “who” (YLT, DARBY) vs “whoever” (WEB)
- textualv40 textual variant between 'us' and 'you' — “us” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “you” (DRC)
- textualv40 textual variant and translation of being for us or for you — “for us” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “on our part” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “side” (WEB) vs “for you” (DRC)
- grammaticalv41 phrasing of 'whoever gives' — “whosoever shall” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “whoever will” (WEB) vs “whoever may” (YLT) vs “whoever” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv41 translation of the strong double negative — “shall not” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “in no wise” (ASV, DARBY) vs “will in no way” (WEB) vs “may” (YLT)
- grammaticalv42 choice of demonstrative vs definite article — “these” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the” (YLT, DARBY)
- grammaticalv42 phrasing of the relative clause for believing — “that believe in” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “who” (WEB, DARBY) vs “on” (ASV) vs “believing” (YLT)
- lexicalv43 (vv 43, 45, 47) literal vs contextual translation of 'good' vs 'better' — “better” (WEB, KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “good” (ASV)
- grammaticalv43 (vv 43, 45, 47) choice of pronoun object — “thee” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you” (WEB) vs “maimed” (YLT)
- grammaticalv44 (vv 44, 46, 48) tense of the worm not dying — “dieth not” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “doesn’t die” (WEB) vs “is dying” (YLT) vs “dies” (DARBY)
- lexicalv44 (vv 44, 46, 48) translation of the fire not being quenched — “quenched” (WEB, KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “being” (YLT) vs “extinguished” (DRC)
- textualv48 textual variant between pronoun 'their' and definite article — “their” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “the” (DRC)
- grammaticalv49 phrasing of everyone being salted — “every one shall” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “everyone will” (WEB) vs “with fire” (YLT)
- grammaticalv50 choice of second person plural pronoun — “ye” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB, DRC)
- grammaticalv50 phrasing of having salt in yourselves — “yourselves” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “salt” (YLT) vs “you” (DRC)
- lexicalv50 translation of the verb for being at peace — “have” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “be at” (WEB, ASV, DARBY)
- grammaticalv50 phrasing of being at peace with each other — “one with another” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “one” (WEB, DARBY) vs “in” (YLT) vs “among you” (DRC)
Step 6Synthesize — atomic claims, by family, not seat count
Every statement is split into the smallest testable claims; each eligible profile is AFFIRM / DENY / QUALIFY / UNSPECIFIED (silence is never assent); a claim rises to consensus by families. Only affirm-vs-deny is contradiction — a qualification is diversity.
The consensus
Broadly, Christ's command to amputate offending body parts represents the necessity of spiritually severing oneself from sinful passions and worldly attachments. Several traditions understand the Transfiguration as modeling the future spiritual transformation of humanity and view the command to listen to the Son as establishing Christ's authority over the Old Testament Law and Prophets. Regarding faith and spiritual power, some traditions emphasize that the disciples' inability to cast out a demon shows spiritual authority requires continuous relational dependence on God—with severe demonic influences overcome only through prayer and fasting—and note that the father's plea illustrates how genuine saving faith can coexist with human weakness through preceding divine grace. However, the nature of this faith is disputed, with traditions divided over whether the father's cry models a necessary synergy of the human will cooperating with divine grace. Other significant disputes center on whether the toleration of an outside exorcist provides a mandate against sectarianism by requiring the recognition of authentic ministry in other groups, and the meaning of Gehenna, where traditions are sharply divided over whether the unquenchable fire establishes literal eternal conscious torment, denotes the irreversible annihilation of the wicked, or permits a hope for restorative divine justice.
Broad — SUPPORT in all but one family, that one undetermined
The command to amputate offending body parts represents the necessity of spiritually severing oneself from sinful passions and worldly attachments.
8 affirm · 0 deny · 2 qualify · 2 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation SUPPORTFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (10)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The exhortation to 'cut off' the offending hand or eye (vv. 43-47) is consistently applied in spiritual direction as the mandate to sever attachments to 'near occasions of sin'—people, places, or habits that lead to spiritual death—rather than literal self-mutilation.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Theophylact of Ochrid interprets the cutting off of the hand, foot, or eye as the absolute necessity of severing internal sinful passions and cutting ties with those who lead one into wickedness, emphasizing spiritual amputation over physical mutilation.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, the violent imagery of cutting off the hand, foot, or eye (vv. 43-47) is universally applied in monastic literature not as literal self-mutilation, but as the absolute, uncompromising severance of the soul from sinful passions, heretical thoughts, and worldly attachments.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Jesus counters their ambition by lifting up a child as the model of reception, rebukes their sectarian impulse to stop an outside exorcist, and concludes with severe, hyperbolic warnings about the absolute necessity of removing causes of sin to avoid Gehenna.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Believers are exhorted to take radical, decisive measures to root out temptations, recognizing the extreme gravity of sin.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“The injunctions to 'cut off' the hand or foot (vv. 43-47) are applied as urgent commands for the radical mortification of personal sin and the maintenance of strict moral purity, though understood figuratively rather than literally.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“The call for radical self-denial (cutting off the offending limb) is applied as a demand for total consecration, urging believers to ruthlessly eliminate any practices or influences that might cause them to stumble into sin.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
“The dramatic commands to excise causes of stumbling (Mark 9:43-47) are read not as literal self-mutilation, but as underlining the radical cost of discipleship (*Nachfolge*) and the necessity of communal purity.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Pentecostals emphasize that to be effective vessels of the Holy Spirit's power, believers must maintain strict personal holiness and rigorously remove sources of sin.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
“Additionally, the warnings about cutting off one's hand or foot (Mark 9:43-48) are applied literally regarding the eternality of hell and the absolute necessity of personal holiness and church discipline, while the narrative of the unaffiliated exorcist (Mark 9:38-40) continues to prompt internal reflection on the boundaries of fellowship and the historic tension between the movement's early unity impulses and its later exclusivity.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Family-specific — characteristic of one family
The Transfiguration provides a foretaste of the glorified resurrected bodies of the saints.
2 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Thomas Aquinas reads the event as the supreme revelation of Christ's divine glory and a foretaste of the glorified bodies of the saints, noting a Trinitarian manifestation where the Father speaks, the Son shines, and the Holy Spirit appears in the overshadowing cloud.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“In application, Adventist pastors and educators frequently use the Transfiguration as a source of assurance regarding the Second Coming and the literal bodily resurrection of the dead.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The subject transfigured in divine glory on the mountain is indivisibly the exact same subject who voluntarily suffers and dies.
3 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation SUPPORTFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (3)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“They insist that the single divine subject who radiates light is the exact same subject who voluntarily suffers and dies in the flesh, fiercely rejecting any Christology that would divide the miracle-worker from the sufferer.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“arguing that the uncreated glory revealed on the mountain is not an escape from suffering but intimately bound to the impending passion, offering a vision of humanity ultimately transformed by divine life.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Jesus shatters this by leading them down the mountain to face demonic torment (vv. 14-29) and the reality of his impending death (vv. 31-32), demonstrating that God is revealed most profoundly in suffering and the cross.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
The Transfiguration models the future spiritual transformation and deification of humanity.
4 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 8 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (4)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The Eastern Catholic tradition, heavily drawing on Maximus the Confessor, views the Taboric light as the uncreated glory of God manifesting the deification of human nature...” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The narrative of the Transfiguration is celebrated as one of the Twelve Great Feasts (August 6), emphasizing the believer's ultimate calling to theosis (deification) by participating in the uncreated light.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Liturgically, the Transfiguration (vv. 2-8) is one of the highest feasts across the communion (e.g., the Coptic Feast of the Transfiguration, the Armenian Vardavar, and the Ethiopian Buhe), celebrating the deification of human nature through its union with the Word.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“The uncreated glory revealed at the Transfiguration is inseparable from the impending cross and prefigures the ultimate transformation of humanity.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The command to 'listen to him' as Moses and Elijah fade establishes that Christ's authority supersedes the Old Testament Law and Prophets.
5 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 7 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation SUPPORTFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (5)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“When the cloud overshadows them and the Father commands, 'Listen to him' (v. 7), the Law and Prophets give way to Christ alone, establishing the ultimate supremacy of the Gospel.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“When the voice declares, "Listen to him," it marks the fulfillment of the older covenantal administrations in the Mediator.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Correcting the category of theological exegesis, the tradition reads the heavenly voice at the Transfiguration (v. 7) not just as a narrative event, but as a doctrinal establishment of Christ's supreme and final authority over the prior revelation represented by Moses (the Law) and Elijah (the Prophets).” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“Stuart Murray (*Biblical Interpretation in the Anabaptist Tradition*) notes that Anabaptists use this narrative to insist that the Old Testament (representing the Law and the Prophets) must be subordinated to and interpreted through the life and teachings of Jesus.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Their fading away, leaving 'Jesus only,' signifies the abrogation of the Old Covenant and the establishment of the New Covenant.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
The disciples' inability to cast out the demon demonstrates that spiritual authority is not an inherent possession but requires continuous relational dependence on God.
4 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 8 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (4)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“The disciples' failure (v. 29) demonstrates that ministerial power is not inherent but requires utter dependence on God.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Jesus' teaching on prayer and fasting is practically applied by maintaining these disciplines as essential channels for God's empowering grace, recognizing that some spiritual strongholds—often understood internally as the remnants of the 'carnal nature'—cannot be overcome without rigorous devotion.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The disciples' failure to cast out the 'dumb and deaf spirit' (v. 25) despite their prior commissioning (in Mark 6) illustrates that spiritual authority is not a static possession. Instead, it requires continuous relational dependence on God.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The narrative of the demoniac is applied to spiritual warfare, emphasizing that certain spiritual victories require absolute dependence on God through prayer.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
Certain severe forms of demonic influence and entrenched sin can only be overcome through the specific ascetic disciplines of prayer and fasting.
5 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 6 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (6)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The disciples' failure to cast out the demon (v. 29) anchors the Church's exorcistic and ascetical disciplines, teaching that deeply rooted sins and demonic influence yield only to 'prayer and fasting.'” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Christ's instruction that certain demons are cast out only by prayer and fasting forms the foundation of Orthodox asceticism, shaping the church's rigorous fasting cycles as vital tools for spiritual warfare.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Ascetically, the command to cast out demons by prayer and fasting (v. 29) is woven into the extensive fasting cycles of the Coptic, Ethiopian, and Syriac calendars, where spiritual warfare is viewed as impossible without physical discipline.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Wesley heavily emphasized that spiritual power and victory over deep-seated corruption require disciplined, warm-hearted practical piety, specifically regular fasting and fervent prayer.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
“It proceeds to an exorcism of a severely afflicted boy, highlighting the necessity of faith, prayer, and fasting.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Donald C. Stamps ('Full Life Study Bible') notes on verse 29 that overcoming severe demonic oppression requires believers to maintain heightened spiritual sensitivity and power through the disciplines of prayer and fasting.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Jesus' definition of true greatness as being 'servant of all' mandates a conscious rejection of worldly, coercive, and hierarchical power structures within the church.
2 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Additionally, Christ's teaching on greatness (vv. 33-35) is applied to church polity and Christian ethics, instructing pastors, elders, and all believers to govern and live through humble servanthood rather than lordly ambition.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“Anabaptists apply this chapter by organizing their communities around models of servant leadership rather than hierarchical, coercive power, viewing church leadership as a calling to wash feet and minister to the vulnerable.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
Tradition-specific — one tradition only
The Transfiguration manifests the presence of the Holy Trinity.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Thomas Aquinas reads the event as the supreme revelation of Christ's divine glory and a foretaste of the glorified bodies of the saints, noting a Trinitarian manifestation where the Father speaks, the Son shines, and the Holy Spirit appears in the overshadowing cloud.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Christ's shining garments at the Transfiguration symbolize the spiritual illumination and deeper sense of Scripture.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“...with Christ's white garments symbolizing the spiritual illumination of creation and the deeper spiritual sense of Scripture.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Peter's desire to build three tabernacles reflects a human attempt to grasp heavenly glory while evading the necessary path of the cross.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Peter's impulsive desire to build tents (v. 5) is frequently critiqued as a 'theology of glory' (theologia gloriae)—a human attempt to secure heavenly glory and triumph while bypassing suffering.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
The command to listen to the Son dictates that Old Testament precedents cannot be used to authorize New Testament church practices or worship.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (2)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
“This allowed early Anabaptists to reject magisterial Protestant justifications for state violence or warfare that relied on Old Testament precedents, asserting that the church must follow the peaceful Christ above all.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“The command 'Listen to him' (Mark 9:7) is continuously applied to hermeneutical debates, particularly to justify why Old Testament practices—such as mechanical instrumental music in worship, the burning of incense, or Sabbath-keeping—cannot be imported into the church; believers must find positive New Testament authorization for their practices.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
The demonic possession of the boy represents the broader cosmic controversy between Satan's destructive power and Christ's restorative power.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The healing of the demon-possessed boy (verses 17-27) is viewed through the great-controversy lens as a vivid demonstration of Satan's intent to destroy humanity versus Christ's power to restore.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
The declaration that all things are possible to the one who believes establishes that miraculous physical healing and deliverance are actively accessed through expectant faith.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Jesus' statement that all things are possible to the one who believes establishes that miraculous healing and deliverance are actively accessed through expectant faith, while the father's plea models honest reliance on Christ.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
Jesus' embrace of the child signifies that the kingdom of God is received purely as a passive gift, supporting the theology of infant baptism.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, Jesus' welcoming of the child (vv. 36-37) is practically applied in baptismal theology to underscore that the kingdom of God is received purely as a passive gift, supporting the practice of infant baptism.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
Jesus' statement that some present would not taste death before seeing the kingdom arrive with power proves the kingdom was established as a present reality in the first century.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Because Jesus stated that some standing there would not taste death before the kingdom came with power, the tradition insists the kingdom cannot be a future, earthly millennial reign; rather, it was established in the first century, specifically on the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2, when the Holy Spirit descended with power.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
The call to 'have peace one with another' serves as a foundational directive for the church's commitment to pacifism and nonviolence.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 11 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (1)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“Finally, the concluding command to 'have peace one with another' (Mark 9:50) anchors the tradition's commitment to pacifism, nonresistance, and restorative community discipline.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
Mentioned across families — affirmed somewhere in each family, no majority — not consensus
The father's cry, 'help my unbelief,' demonstrates that human faith cannot exist without the preceding and sustaining gift of divine grace.
4 affirm · 0 deny · 0 qualify · 8 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (4)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Augustine uses this verse to demonstrate that human will cannot generate saving faith without the prior, animating grace of God.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“The father's desperate plea, 'I believe; help my unbelief' (v. 24), is formally cited in the Formula of Concord to illustrate that faith is not a human work, but a gift of the Holy Spirit.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“The father's cry, 'Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief' (v. 24), is heavily utilized in Baptist soteriology to illustrate that saving faith is a divine gift that often coexists with human frailty, a theme frequently expounded by Charles Spurgeon.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“John Wesley interpreted this not as a contradiction, but as a depiction of a soul cooperating with prevenient grace; it acknowledges the presence of initial faith while urgently petitioning Christ for the fullness of saving or sanctifying faith.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The father's plea illustrates that genuine saving faith can coexist with inherent human doubt and weakness.
6 affirm · 0 deny · 1 qualify · 5 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation SUPPORTFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (7)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“'Lord, I believe; help my unbelief' (v. 24) is a frequent personal aspiration in Catholic devotion, often prayed before receiving the Eucharist or during times of spiritual desolation to ask God to supply what human faith lacks.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Pastorally, the father's cry, 'Lord, I believe; help my unbelief,' is frequently invoked as a model of Anglican spiritual temper, validating a faith that openly holds tension, doubt, and intellectual inquiry.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“The tradition emphasizes that even weak, struggling faith is saving faith because it grasps Christ outside of itself, rather than relying on its own subjective intensity.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“The *Westminster Confession of Faith* relies on this verse to articulate that true faith can be weak, imperfect, and heavily assailed by doubt.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“The father's cry, 'Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief' (v. 24), is heavily utilized in Baptist soteriology to illustrate that saving faith is a divine gift that often coexists with human frailty, a theme frequently expounded by Charles Spurgeon.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
“John Wesley interpreted this not as a contradiction, but as a depiction of a soul cooperating with prevenient grace; it acknowledges the presence of initial faith while urgently petitioning Christ for the fullness of saving or sanctifying faith.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Pastors frequently use the father's cry (v. 24) to encourage congregants to bring their doubts and crises to Jesus without pretense to receive their miracle.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Disputed — a family is mixed, or families affirm vs deny
The light of the Transfiguration is the uncreated glory and energy of God.
2 affirm · 0 deny · 2 qualify · 8 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (4)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The Eastern Catholic tradition, heavily drawing on Maximus the Confessor, views the Taboric light as the uncreated glory of God manifesting the deification of human nature...” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The light of the Transfiguration seen by the disciples was the uncreated energy and glory of God, not a created physical light.” - Oriental Orthodox · QUALIFY
“The Transfiguration (vv. 2-8) is understood not as a temporary grace bestowed upon a human subject, but as the natural, uncreated glory of the 'one incarnate nature of God the Word' shining through His own flesh.” - Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“The uncreated glory revealed at the Transfiguration is inseparable from the impending cross and prefigures the ultimate transformation of humanity.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Moses and Elijah at the Transfiguration represent the bodily resurrected and living translated saints at the Second Coming, respectively.
1 affirm · 1 deny · 0 qualify · 10 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church MIXEDwho said what (2)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Ellen G. White famously typified this scene as a miniature representation of the kingdom of glory: Moses represents the saints who will be resurrected at the Second Coming, while Elijah represents the righteous who will be translated without seeing death.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“Moses represents the Law, and Elijah represents the Prophets.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
The father's cry models the necessary synergy of the human will cooperating with divine grace to attain perfect spiritual faith.
3 affirm · 1 deny · 0 qualify · 8 silentAncient SUPPORTReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDwho said what (4)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The father's plea in verse 24 is received as a supreme paradigm of human synergy, where human weakness humbly invites divine completion.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Philoxenus of Mabbug receives the father's cry, 'Lord, I believe; help my unbelief' (v. 24), as the paradigmatic expression of the human will cooperating with divine grace, marking the threshold between natural faith and the perfect spiritual faith required of the ascetic.” - Lutheran · DENY
“The father's desperate plea, 'I believe; help my unbelief' (v. 24), is formally cited in the Formula of Concord to illustrate that faith is not a human work, but a gift of the Holy Spirit.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“John Wesley interpreted this not as a contradiction, but as a depiction of a soul cooperating with prevenient grace; it acknowledges the presence of initial faith while urgently petitioning Christ for the fullness of saving or sanctifying faith.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
The command not to forbid the outside exorcist demonstrates that valid sacraments and objective spiritual power can operate outside the visible bounds of the institutional church.
1 affirm · 0 deny · 2 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDwho said what (3)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Jesus' command not to forbid the outsider casting out demons (vv. 38-40) is leveraged by Augustine against the Donatists to argue that the power of Christ's name extends beyond the visible bounds of the Church, securing the objective validity of sacraments (like Baptism) administered by schismatics.” - Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“Evangelical Anglicans, represented by J.C. Ryle, have read Jesus' command not to forbid the exorcist as a stark warning against sectarianism and an encouragement to recognize the Holy Spirit's work outside formal ecclesiastical structures.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · QUALIFY
“Additionally, Jesus' rebuke of John for stopping the unauthorized exorcist (vv. 38-40) is received as an endorsement of recognizing the Spirit's authentic work wherever Christ's name is exalted in power, promoting fellowship based on shared spiritual power rather than rigid organizational boundaries.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The command not to forbid the outside exorcist is a mandate against sectarianism, requiring the recognition of authentic ministry and grace in other Christian groups.
3 affirm · 0 deny · 4 qualify · 5 silentAncient LEANING-CONTESTEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDwho said what (7)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“Jesus' command not to forbid the outsider casting out demons (vv. 38-40) is leveraged by Augustine against the Donatists to argue that the power of Christ's name extends beyond the visible bounds of the Church, securing the objective validity of sacraments (like Baptism) administered by schismatics.” - Oriental Orthodox · QUALIFY
“The chapter concludes with kingdom ethics: Jesus elevates a child as the model of greatness, warns against sectarianism in ministry, and delivers severe, absolute commands to excise any stumbling blocks—whether hand, foot, or eye—warning of the unquenchable fire of Gehenna.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Jesus' rebuke of John regarding the unknown exorcist is a strict warning against a sectarian spirit and a command to recognize grace outside one's own immediate ecclesiastical circle.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Additionally, verses 38-40 are often invoked to justify cooperative missional efforts with other evangelical believers outside the local Baptist congregation, balancing local church autonomy with a broader recognition of the kingdom of God.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
“He rebukes sectarianism by telling the disciples not to stop an unauthorized exorcist.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Additionally, Jesus' rebuke of John for stopping the unauthorized exorcist (vv. 38-40) is received as an endorsement of recognizing the Spirit's authentic work wherever Christ's name is exalted in power, promoting fellowship based on shared spiritual power rather than rigid organizational boundaries.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
“while the narrative of the unaffiliated exorcist (Mark 9:38-40) continues to prompt internal reflection on the boundaries of fellowship and the historic tension between the movement's early unity impulses and its later exclusivity.”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
The imagery of the undying worm and unquenchable fire establishes the doctrine of literal, eternal conscious torment for the wicked.
3 affirm · 2 deny · 2 qualify · 5 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation MIXEDFree-church MIXEDwho said what (7)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The warnings of unquenchable fire and the undying worm define the dogmatic reality of eternal conscious punishment in Hell.” - Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
“The graphic descriptions of Gehenna and unquenchable fire should not be interpreted as eternal conscious torment, but rather permit a hope for restorative divine justice.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Finally, Jesus' explicit warnings about the "worm that does not die" and the "unquenchable fire" (vv. 43-48) are received as definitive proof of literal, eternal conscious punishment for the wicked.” - Baptist · QUALIFY
“Furthermore, Jesus's stark warnings about the 'unquenchable fire' and the undying worm (vv. 43-48) form a primary biblical foundation for the tradition's confession of eternal conscious punishment, explicitly informing confessional documents like the Baptist Faith and Message.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · QUALIFY
“Furthermore, the severe warnings about 'unquenchable fire' and the command to cut off the offending hand or eye (vv. 43-48) are preached as literal warnings about the reality of hell and applied as a call to radical sanctification.” - Seventh-day Adventist · DENY
“Theologians like Samuele Bacchiocchi argue that 'unquenchable' describes a fire that cannot be extinguished until it has completely consumed its fuel, resulting in permanent destruction rather than eternal conscious torment, and that the undying worm imagery signifies total consumption of dead bodies.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Additionally, the warnings about cutting off one's hand or foot (Mark 9:43-48) are applied literally regarding the eternality of hell and the absolute necessity of personal holiness and church discipline, while the narrative of the unaffiliated exorcist (Mark 9:38-40) continues to prompt internal reflection on the boundaries of fellowship and the historic tension between the movement's early unity impulses and its later exclusivity.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The unquenchable fire and undying worm denote the complete and irreversible annihilation of the wicked rather than eternal conscious torment.
1 affirm · 4 deny · 0 qualify · 7 silentAncient LEANING-CONTESTEDReformation LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church MIXEDwho said what (5)
- Catholic · DENY
“The warnings of unquenchable fire and the undying worm define the dogmatic reality of eternal conscious punishment in Hell.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“Finally, Jesus' explicit warnings about the "worm that does not die" and the "unquenchable fire" (vv. 43-48) are received as definitive proof of literal, eternal conscious punishment for the wicked.” - Baptist · DENY
“Furthermore, Jesus's stark warnings about the 'unquenchable fire' and the undying worm (vv. 43-48) form a primary biblical foundation for the tradition's confession of eternal conscious punishment, explicitly informing confessional documents like the Baptist Faith and Message.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Theologians like Samuele Bacchiocchi argue that 'unquenchable' describes a fire that cannot be extinguished until it has completely consumed its fuel, resulting in permanent destruction rather than eternal conscious torment, and that the undying worm imagery signifies total consumption of dead bodies.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“Additionally, the warnings about cutting off one's hand or foot (Mark 9:43-48) are applied literally regarding the eternality of hell and the absolute necessity of personal holiness and church discipline, while the narrative of the unaffiliated exorcist (Mark 9:38-40) continues to prompt internal reflection on the boundaries of fellowship and the historic tension between the movement's early unity impulses and its later exclusivity.”
- Catholic · DENY
The descriptions of Gehenna and unquenchable fire permit a hope for restorative divine justice rather than endless punitive torment.
1 affirm · 6 deny · 0 qualify · 5 silentAncient LEANING-CONTESTEDReformation MIXEDFree-church OPPOSEwho said what (7)
- Catholic · DENY
“The warnings of unquenchable fire and the undying worm define the dogmatic reality of eternal conscious punishment in Hell.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“The graphic descriptions of Gehenna and unquenchable fire should not be interpreted as eternal conscious torment, but rather permit a hope for restorative divine justice.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“Finally, Jesus' explicit warnings about the "worm that does not die" and the "unquenchable fire" (vv. 43-48) are received as definitive proof of literal, eternal conscious punishment for the wicked.” - Baptist · DENY
“Furthermore, Jesus's stark warnings about the 'unquenchable fire' and the undying worm (vv. 43-48) form a primary biblical foundation for the tradition's confession of eternal conscious punishment, explicitly informing confessional documents like the Baptist Faith and Message.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · DENY
“Furthermore, the severe warnings about 'unquenchable fire' and the command to cut off the offending hand or eye (vv. 43-48) are preached as literal warnings about the reality of hell and applied as a call to radical sanctification.” - Seventh-day Adventist · DENY
“The unquenchable fire and undying worm in Gehenna denote the complete and irreversible destruction of the wicked, rather than eternal conscious torment.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“Additionally, the warnings about cutting off one's hand or foot (Mark 9:43-48) are applied literally regarding the eternality of hell and the absolute necessity of personal holiness and church discipline, while the narrative of the unaffiliated exorcist (Mark 9:38-40) continues to prompt internal reflection on the boundaries of fellowship and the historic tension between the movement's early unity impulses and its later exclusivity.”
- Catholic · DENY
The command to amputate body parts functions primarily as the strict preaching of the Law to crush self-righteousness and drive the conscience to Christ.
1 affirm · 2 deny · 0 qualify · 9 silentAncient UNDETERMINEDReformation UNDETERMINEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDwho said what (3)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Finally, the severe commands to cut off a hand or foot (vv. 43-48) are read as the strict, uncompromising preaching of the Law, intended to crush human self-righteousness and drive the terrified conscience to Christ.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · DENY
“Furthermore, the severe commands to sever offending hands, feet, or eyes are interpreted through the lens of sanctification and entire sanctification.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · DENY
“Furthermore, the severe warnings about 'unquenchable fire' and the command to cut off the offending hand or eye (vv. 43-48) are preached as literal warnings about the reality of hell and applied as a call to radical sanctification.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
Step 7Render the New Consensus Bible
From the original-language text. The traditions document reception; they do not vote on wording. Every contested wording the rendering settled is listed below, not hidden.
1And he was saying to them: "Amen I say to you, that there are some of those standing here who will by no means taste death until they see the kingdom of God having come in power." 2And after six days Jesus takes along Peter and James and John, and brings them up to a high mountain privately by themselves alone. And he was transformed before them, 3and his garments became shining, luminously light like snow, such as no launderer on earth is able so to whiten. 4And there appeared to them Elijah with Moses, and they were conversing with Jesus. 5And answering, Peter says to Jesus: "Rabbi, it is good for us to be here, and let us make three tents: for you one, and for Moses one, and for Elijah one." 6For he did not know what to answer, for they had become terrified. 7And a cloud came overshadowing them, and a voice came out of the cloud saying: "This is my Son, the beloved; listen to him." 8And suddenly, looking around, they no longer saw anyone, but Jesus only with themselves. 9And as they were descending from the mountain, he commanded them that they should recount to no one the things they saw, except when the Son of Man should rise from the dead. 10And they kept the saying to themselves, debating what the 'to rise from the dead' is. 11And they questioned him, saying: "Why do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?" 12And answering, he said to them: "Elijah indeed, having come first, restores all things. And how is it written of the Son of Man, that he must endure much and be treated with contempt? 13But I say to you that Elijah has indeed come, and they did to him whatever they willed, just as it is written of him." 14And coming to the disciples, they saw a great crowd around them and scribes debating with them. 15And immediately all the crowd, seeing him, were astonished, and running forward they greeted him. 16And he questioned the scribes: "What are you debating with them?" 17And one out of the crowd answered him: "Teacher, I brought my son to you, who has a mute spirit. 18And wherever it seizes him, it shatters him; and he foams and grinds his teeth and stiffens. And I spoke to your disciples that they might cast it out, and they lacked the strength." 19And answering them, he says: "O faithless generation, how long will I be with you? How long will I put up with you? Bring him to me." 20And they brought him to him. And seeing him, the spirit immediately convulsed him, and falling upon the ground, he rolled around foaming. 21And he questioned his father: "How much time is it since this has happened to him?" And he said: "From childhood. 22And often it has cast him both into the fire and into waters to destroy him; but if you can do anything, help us, having compassion on us." 23And Jesus said to him: "The 'if you can believe'—all things are possible for the one who believes." 24And immediately crying out, the father of the child said with tears: "I believe, Lord; help my unbelief!" 25Now Jesus, seeing that a crowd was running together, rebuked the unclean spirit, saying to it: "The mute and deaf spirit, I command you: come out of him, and do not enter into him again." 26And crying out and severely convulsing him, it came out, and he became like a corpse, so that the many said that he died. 27But Jesus, taking hold of his hand, raised him, and he stood up. 28And when he had entered into a house, his disciples questioned him privately: "Why is it that we could not cast it out?" 29And he said to them: "This kind can come out by nothing except by prayer and fasting." 30And going out from there, they were passing through Galilee, and he did not want that anyone should know. 31For he was teaching his disciples and saying to them that: "The Son of Man is being handed over into the hands of men, and they will kill him, and having been killed, after three days he will rise." 32But they were ignorant of the saying, and were afraid to question him. 33And they came to Capernaum. And being in the house, he questioned them: "What were you debating on the way?" 34But they kept silent; for they had debated with one another on the way who was greatest. 35And sitting down, he called the twelve and says to them: "If anyone wants to be first, he will be last of all and servant of all." 36And taking a child, he stood him in the midst of them, and taking him in his arms, he said to them: 37"Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me; and whoever receives me, does not receive me, but the one who sent me." 38John said to him, saying: "Teacher, we saw someone casting out demons in your name who does not follow us, and we were forbidding him, because he was not following us." 39But Jesus said: "Do not forbid him; for there is no one who will do a work of power in my name and will be able quickly to speak evil of me. 40For whoever is not against us is for us. 41For whoever gives you a cup of water to drink in my name, because you are Christ’s, amen I say to you that he will by no means lose his reward. 42And whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to stumble, it is better for him if a heavy millstone is hung around his neck and he has been cast into the sea. 43And if your hand causes you to stumble, amputate it; it is better for you to enter into life maimed, than having your two hands to go away into Gehenna, into the unquenchable fire, 44where their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched. 45And if your foot causes you to stumble, amputate it; it is better for you to enter into life lame, than having your two feet to be cast into Gehenna, into the unquenchable fire, 46where their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched. 47And if your eye causes you to stumble, cast it out; it is better for you to enter into the kingdom of God one-eyed, than having two eyes to be cast into the Gehenna of fire, 48where their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched. 49For everyone will be salted with fire, and every sacrifice will be salted with salt. 50Salt is good; but if the salt becomes saltless, with what will you season it? Have salt in yourselves, and be at peace with one another.
Choices made — every dispute the rendering settled
| Verse | Source | Options | Choice | Why | Cat. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | ἀμὴν | (T) Verily, Most certainly, Amen; (S) Truly, Amen; (A) Amen | Amen | Preserves the Hebrew loanword as an interjection reflecting solemn authority. | lexical |
| v1 | τῶν ἑστηκότων οἵτινες | (T) of them that stand here which, those standing here that; (S) of those standing here who | of those standing here who | Accurately reflects the substantivized participle and relative pronoun pattern. | grammatical |
| v2 | τὸν Πέτρον καὶ τὸν Ἰάκωβον καὶ τὸν Ἰωάννην | (T) Peter and James and John; (S) the Peter and the James and the John; (A) Peter and James and John | Peter and James and John | English syntax does not use the definite article for personal names. | grammatical |
| v2 | μετεμορφώθη ἔμπροσθεν αὐτῶν | (T) was transfigured, was changed into another form; (S) was transformed before them | transformed before them | Translates the metamorphosis directly without settling the theological debate over the uncreated nature of the light (disputed among traditions). | interpretive |
| v3 | λευκὰ λίαν | (T) exceeding white, exceedingly white; (S) intensely white, highly white; (A) brilliant white | luminously light | Approximates the lambda alliteration of the original Greek phrase. | stylistic |
| v4 | ὤφθη... ἦσαν | (T) appeared... were; (S) appeared (singular)... were (plural); (A) appeared... were | appeared... were | Reflects the grammatical number shift in the source text from the singular verb taking a compound subject to a plural verb. | grammatical |
| v4 | Ἠλίας σὺν Μωϋσεῖ | (T) Elijah with Moses; (S) Elijah with Moses | Elijah with Moses | Names the figures explicitly without settling the theological interpretation of their representative roles regarding the resurrected and living saints (disputed among traditions). | interpretive |
| v5 | μίαν (x3) | (T) one... one... one; (S) one... one... one | one... one... one | Preserves the threefold repetition of the source text. | stylistic |
| v6 | γὰρ... γὰρ | (T) For... for; (S) For... for | For... for | Preserves the explanatory repetition of the connective particle. | stylistic |
| v8 | οὐκέτι οὐδένα | (T) saw no man any more, saw no one any more; (S) no longer saw anyone | no longer saw anyone | Translates the double negative yielding assonance clearly into English. | grammatical |
| v9 | ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου | (T) the Son of man, the Son of Man; (S) the Son of the Man | the Son of Man | Capitalization of the messianic title reflects theological reverence. | interpretive |
| v10 | τὸ ἐκ νεκρῶν ἀναστῆναι | (T) the rising from the dead; (S) the to rise from the dead | the 'to rise from the dead' | Retains the substantivized infinitive phrase marked by the definite article in English phrasing. | grammatical |
| v12 | πολλὰ πάθῃ | (T) suffer many things; (S) suffer many things, endure much; (A) suffer many things | endure much | Captures the semantic weight of the phrase, though the pi alliteration of the Greek cannot be naturally replicated in English. | stylistic |
| v14 | αὐτούς | (T) them... them; (S) them... them | them... them | Preserves the repeated pronoun referencing the disciples. | stylistic |
| v15 | πᾶς ὁ ὄχλος ἰδόντες... ἐξεθαμβήθησαν | (T) all the multitude when they saw... were amazed; (S) all the crowd seeing... were astonished | all the crowd, seeing... were astonished | Preserves the grammatical number shift from a singular collective subject to a plural participle and plural verb. | grammatical |
| v17 | διδάσκαλε | (T) Master, Teacher; (S) Teacher | Teacher | Translates the interjection accurately. | lexical |
| v18 | ἀφρίζει καὶ τρίζει | (T) foameth and gnasheth, foams and grinds; (S) foams and grinds | foams and grinds | Matches the verbs descriptively, though English loses the exact phonetic rhyme of the Greek. | stylistic |
| v18 | αὐτὸν... αὐτὸν... αὐτοῦ | (T) him... him... his; (S) him... him... his | him... him... his | Preserves the repeated pronoun emphasizing the boy as the object. | stylistic |
| v19 | ἕως πότε... ἕως πότε | (T) how long... how long; (S) until when... until when | How long... How long | Preserves the rhetorical refrain in natural English idiom. | stylistic |
| v20 | ἰδὼν... πεσὼν | (T) when he saw... fell; (S) seeing... falling | seeing... falling | Preserves the participle sequence detailing the action. | grammatical |
| v21 | ἐκ παιδιόθεν | (T) From childhood, Of a child, From his infancy; (S) From from-a-child | From childhood | English cannot replicate the pleonastic double preposition without becoming ungrammatical. | grammatical |
| v22 | καὶ εἰς τὸ πῦρ... καὶ εἰς ὕδατα | (T) both into the fire and into the water, both into fire and into waters; (S) both into the fire and into waters | both into the fire and into waters | Preserves the exact parallel phrasing and the plural of waters. | grammatical |
| v23 | τὸ εἰ δύνῃ πιστεῦσαι | (T) If thou canst believe, The 'if thou couldst' believe, If you can believe; (S) The 'if you can believe' | The 'if you can believe' | Preserves the definite article used to quote the exact phrase. | grammatical |
| v24 | πιστεύω... ἀπιστίᾳ | (T) I believe... unbelief; (S) I believe... unbelief | I believe... unbelief | Preserves the cognate contrast of the Greek terms. | stylistic |
| v24 | πιστεύω κύριε· βοήθει μου τῇ ἀπιστίᾳ | (T) Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief; (S) I believe Lord, help my unbelief | I believe, Lord; help my unbelief! | Maintains the paradox of the father's plea without settling the theological dispute over human synergy versus prevenient grace (disputed among traditions). | interpretive |
| v25 | τὸ ἄλαλον καὶ κωφὸν τὸ πνεῦμα | (T) Thou dumb and deaf spirit, You mute and deaf spirit; (S) The mute and deaf spirit | The mute and deaf spirit | Preserves the article pattern bracketing the adjectives. | grammatical |
| v25 | ἔξελθε / εἰσέλθῃς | (T) come out... enter; (S) exit... enter | come out... enter | Preserves the spatial contrast of the verb stems. | stylistic |
| v26 | κράξας καὶ πολλὰ σπαράξας | (T) crying out and tearing him much; (S) crying out and much convulsing | crying out and severely convulsing | Conveys the intensity of the action, though the Greek assonance is lost in English. | stylistic |
| v27 | αὐτοῦ... αὐτόν | (T) him... him; (S) of him... him | his hand, raised him | Accommodates the redundant pronoun sequence typical of Markan style into English syntax. | grammatical |
| v28 | ὅτι ἡμεῖς οὐκ | (T) we; (S) we | we | Reflects the emphatic pronoun usage in the Greek. | grammatical |
| v29 | ἐν προσευχῇ καὶ νηστείᾳ | (T) prayer and fasting, prayer; (S) prayer and fasting; (A) prayer [omitting 'and fasting'] | prayer and fasting | The phrase is rendered exactly as it appears in the provided source text, despite academic recognition of it as a widely accepted textual variant and likely scribal addition. | textual |
| v31 | ἀποκτενοῦσιν / ἀποκτανθεὶς | (T) kill... killed; (S) kill... killed | kill... killed | Preserves the cognate repetition of the verb. | stylistic |
| v35 | πρῶτος / ἔσχατος | (T) first... last; (S) first... last | first... last | Preserves the structural chiasm and contrast. | stylistic |
| v36 | αὐτὸ... αὐτῶν... αὐτὸ... αὐτοῖς | (T) him... them... him... them; (S) it... them... it... them | him... them... him... them | Preserves the repetition of the pronoun object in sequential clauses, adapting the Greek neuter to natural English animate gender. | grammatical |
| v37 | δέχομαι | (T) receive/receiveth; (S) receives | receives | Preserves the repetition of the verb five times. | stylistic |
| v38 | οὐκ ἀκολουθεῖ ἡμῖν / οὐκ ἠκολούθει ἡμῖν | (T) followeth not us... followeth not us; (S) does not follow us... was not following us | does not follow us... was not following us | Preserves the shift from the present to the imperfect tense in the source text. | grammatical |
| v38 | ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί σου ἐκβάλλοντα δαιμόνια | (T) casting out demons in thy name; (S) casting out demons in your name | casting out demons in your name | Translates the action without settling the ecclesiological debate over whether valid sacraments and objective spiritual power can operate outside the visible institutional church (disputed among traditions). | interpretive |
| v39 | μὴ κωλύετε αὐτόν | (T) Forbid him not, Don't forbid him; (S) Do not forbid him | Do not forbid him | Translates the prohibition directly without settling the interpretive debate over whether it constitutes a mandate against sectarianism and requires recognition of other groups (disputed among traditions). | interpretive |
| v39 | δύναμιν / δυνήσεται | (T) miracle... can, mighty work... be able; (S) power... will be able | work of power... will be able | Preserves the cognate construction between the noun and verb. | stylistic |
| v40 | καθ᾽ ἡμῶν / ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν | (T) against us... on our part, against us... for us; (S) against us... over us / for us | against us... for us | Preserves the spatial chiasm and contrast of the prepositions. | stylistic |
| v41 | ἀμὴν | (T) Verily, Most certainly, Amen; (S) Truly, Amen | amen | Preserves the interjection reflecting solemn authority. | lexical |
| v42 | μύλος ὀνικὸς | (T) millstone, great millstone; (S) donkey millstone | heavy millstone | Conveys the massive size of the animal-driven millstone clearly in dignified English. | lexical |
| v43 | σκανδαλίζῃ | (T) offend, cause to stumble, be a snare to, cause to fall into sin; (S) scandalize | causes you to stumble | Standard rendering that conveys the metaphorical action of trapping without resolving if it primarily functions as strict Law to crush self-righteousness (disputed among traditions). | interpretive |
| v43 | ἀπόκοψον | (T) cut it off; (S) amputate it | amputate it | Translates the severe imperative directly without settling its homiletical function (disputed among traditions). | interpretive |
| v43 | εἰς τὴν γέενναν εἰς τὸ πῦρ τὸ ἄσβεστον | (T) hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched; Gehenna, into the unquenchable fire; (S) Gehenna, into the unquenchable fire | Gehenna, into the unquenchable fire | Transliterates Gehenna and translates the description literally without resolving the eschatological debates over eternal torment versus annihilation or restoration (disputed among traditions). | interpretive |
| v44 | ὅπου ὁ σκώληξ αὐτῶν οὐ τελευτᾷ καὶ τὸ πῦρ οὐ σβέννυται | (T) where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched; (S) where their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched; (A) [omitted as a harmonizing addition] | where their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched | Renders the refrain exactly as provided in the source text, without resolving the nature of the judgment (disputed among traditions). | interpretive |
| v49 | πᾶς γὰρ πυρὶ ἁλισθήσεται καὶ πᾶσα θυσία ἁλὶ ἁλισθήσεται | (T) salted with fire... salted with salt; (S) salted with fire... salted with salt; (A) salted with fire [omitting second clause] | salted with fire, and every sacrifice will be salted with salt | Translates the full text provided in the source block, preserving the cognate repetition. | textual |
| v50 | ἅλας / ἄναλον / ἅλα | (T) salt... lost its saltness... salt; (S) salt... saltless... salt | salt... saltless... salt | Preserves the cognate wordplay. | stylistic |
| v50 | ἐν ἑαυτοῖς / ἐν ἀλλήλοις | (T) in yourselves... one with another; (S) in yourselves... in one another | in yourselves... with one another | Preserves the parallel structure using standard English prepositions. | grammatical |
Limits worth knowing
- This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
- The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
- The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
- The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
- One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
- The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
- Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
- The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.