ManyBibles

Santiago 3

7 traducciones · leer a través de 12 tradiciones.

NCB · Nueva Biblia del Consenso

1Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, knowing that we will receive greater judgment. 2For we all stumble in many ways. If anyone does not stumble in word, this one is a perfect man, able to bridle the whole body as well. 3Now if we put bridles into the mouths of horses so that they obey us, we also guide their whole body. 4Look at the ships also: though they are so large and are driven by fierce winds, they are guided by a very small rudder wherever the impulse of the pilot desires. 5So also the tongue is a small member, and boasts of great things. Look how great a fire kindles how great a forest! 6And the tongue is a fire! The tongue is set among our members as the world of unrighteousness, defiling the whole body, setting on fire the wheel of birth, and being set on fire by Gehenna. 7For every nature of beasts and birds, of reptiles and sea creatures, is tamed and has been tamed by human nature; 8but no one among humans is able to tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison. 9With it we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse humans who are made according to the likeness of God. 10Out of the same mouth comes blessing and cursing. My brothers, these things ought not to be so. 11A spring does not pour forth the sweet and the bitter from the same opening, does it? 12Can a fig tree, my brothers, produce olives, or a vine produce figs? So neither can a spring produce salt and sweet water. 13Who is wise and understanding among you? Let him show his works by his good conduct in the gentleness of wisdom. 14But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your heart, do not boast and lie against the truth. 15This is not the wisdom coming down from above, but is earthly, natural, demonic. 16For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there is instability and every vile deed. 17But the wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceful, gentle, yielding, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial, and unhypocritical. 18And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace by those making peace.

Versión generada por IA, no es una traducción humana. Leer Santiago 3 en la Nueva Biblia del Consenso →

En qué coinciden las tradiciones

It is widely affirmed that the tongue is a disproportionately powerful and naturally untamable force capable of directing and defiling the entire person, and that it is hypocritical and unnatural to use the same mouth to bless God and curse human beings. Furthermore, it is broadly held that teachers face a heavier judgment because of the immense power and danger of speech, and that achieving mastery over the tongue cannot be accomplished by human nature alone, requiring instead the supernatural… Inicia sesión para leer el consenso completo →

Sostenido por la mayoría, pero no por todas

  • Teachers face a heavier judgment because of the immense power and danger of speech. (8 affirm)
  • No human being can tame the tongue by nature alone; achieving mastery over speech requires the supernatural grace of the Holy Spirit. (7 affirm)

Dónde difieren las tradiciones

  • The assertion that all stumble in many things proves that even justified Christians remain sinners incapable of perfect law-keeping in this life.

    catholic: QUALIFY; lutheran: AFFIRM; reformed: AFFIRM

  • The 'perfect man' who does not stumble in word refers to the mature believer who, by grace, exercises complete governance over their passions and outward behavior.

    oriental-orthodox: AFFIRM; lutheran: DENY; reformed: DENY; methodist: AFFIRM

  • Cursing a fellow human who bears the divine image is a grave moral failure that completely negates any blessing offered to God.

    catholic: QUALIFY; orthodox: AFFIRM; anabaptist: QUALIFY

  • Earthly wisdom represents autonomous secular reasoning, while the 'wisdom from above' is uncreated grace and spiritual illumination.

    catholic: QUALIFY; orthodox: AFFIRM; oriental-orthodox: QUALIFY

  • The 'wisdom from above' provides a definitive catalog of the holy tempers that characterize a fully sanctified heart.

    lutheran: DENY; methodist: AFFIRM

Cómo lo lee cada tradición

Cada lectura se generó de forma aislada — ninguna tradición ve la respuesta de otra.

Catholic

James addresses his community in the tradition of Jewish wisdom literature, warning against the hasty assumption of teaching roles due to the stricter judgment they incur (James 3:1). He employs a series of vivid, practical analogies—horses' bits, ships' rudders, and a small spark igniting a forest—to illustrate the tongue's disproportionate power over the entire person (James 3:2-6). Acknowledging the paradox that humanity can tame all beasts but cannot tame the tongue, he identifies it as an unruly evil (James 3:7-8). He exposes the hypocrisy of using the same mouth to bless God and curse human beings who bear the divine image, using natural impossibilities like a fresh and salt spring or a fig-bearing vine to prove such duality is unnatural (James 3:9-12). Finally, the chapter contrasts earthly, sensual, and demonic wisdom, which breeds jealousy and disorder, with the wisdom from above, which yields purity, peace, and good fruits (James 3:13-18). Reception: Within the Catholic communion, James 3 provides foundational texts for both dogmatic theology and ascetical practice. Latin Fathers, notably Augustine in 'On Nature and Grace', emphasized verse 2 ('in many things we all offend') in anti-Pelagian debates to demonstrate that even the justified commit venial sins, requiring constant reliance on grace. Bede the Venerable, in his 'Commentary on the Seven Catholic Epistles', interpreted the declaration that no human can tame the tongue (James 3:8) not as a cause for despair, but as proof that humanity requires the grace of the Holy Spirit to achieve mastery over speech. In the East, the chapter is central to the monastic and hesychast traditions. John Climacus in 'The Ladder of Divine Ascent' utilizes the warnings about the tongue to mandate strict ascetical silence as a prerequisite for inner stillness and union with God. Thomas Aquinas in the 'Summa Theologiae' structured his moral evaluation of sins of speech, such as detraction and contumely, around the imagery of the destructive fire (James 3:6), while also identifying the 'wisdom from above' (James 3:17) as the infused Gift of Wisdom from the Holy Spirit, which directly causes the 'fruit of righteousness sown in peace' (James 3:18). Furthermore, verse 9 serves as a profound anthropological anchor across both East and West, establishing that the indelible image of God in every person strictly forbids cursing or degrading one's neighbor.

Eastern Orthodox

In its immediate context, James 3 confronts the community, particularly aspiring teachers, with the disproportionate power and severe danger of speech. The tongue is depicted as a small but unmanageable force that directs the body like a bit or a rudder, yet operates as an untamable fire fueled by Gehenna. The chapter exposes the inherent hypocrisy of using the same mouth to bless God while cursing fellow humans who are made in the divine image, comparing this to a fountain yielding both fresh and bitter water. Finally, the text draws a stark contrast between two types of wisdom: a bitter, earthly, and demonic wisdom characterized by jealousy, and a pure, peaceable wisdom descending from above that yields the fruit of righteousness. Reception: The Eastern Orthodox tradition receives James 3 as a foundational text for hesychast spirituality, theological anthropology, and epistemology. The warning regarding the tongue is read through the lens of nepsis (watchfulness) and hesychia (inner stillness). St. John Climacus interprets the tongue's fire as a consuming force that ruins ascetic labor, making silence a primary virtue for purifying the heart. The reference to humanity being made 'after the similitude of God' is a vital locus for Orthodox teachings on the divine image; St. Maximus the Confessor argues from this verse that one cannot possess the love of God while cursing the divine image in one's neighbor, as violence against the image is violence against the Archetype. Furthermore, St. Gregory Palamas heavily relies on the distinction between earthly and heavenly wisdom. Palamas identifies earthly wisdom with autonomous, secular philosophy that cannot attain true knowledge of God, whereas the 'wisdom from above' is identified with uncreated grace and the illuminating energy of the Holy Spirit, accessible only to a purified intellect (nous). Additionally, Byzantine commentators like Blessed Theophylact of Ohrid interpret the 'course of nature' (the wheel of genesis) as the entire cycle of human life from birth, which becomes deeply corrupted when the passions are verbally ignited.

Oriental Orthodox

The text presents James's strict warning to teachers concerning the heavier judgment they will face, moving into an extended discourse on the disproportionate power of the tongue. Using metaphors of horse bits, ship rudders, and a small spark igniting a forest, the chapter describes the tongue as an unruly fire and a world of iniquity that defiles the whole body. It concludes by contrasting earthly, demonic wisdom rooted in jealousy and selfish ambition with the pure, peaceable, and merciful wisdom descending from above. Reception: Within the Oriental Orthodox communion, this chapter provides the scriptural bedrock for the ascetic theology of silence and the guarding of the senses. The Alexandrian tradition, represented by Didymus the Blind in his Commentary on the Catholic Epistles, reads the 'perfect man' who bridles his body as the mature ascetic who has entirely subjected his passions to spiritual reason. Didymus further interprets the 'wisdom from above' as the direct, sanctifying illumination of the Holy Spirit, which stands in absolute opposition to the earthly wisdom of the passions. The foundational monastic texts of the Coptic tradition, such as the Apophthegmata Patrum, frequently draw on the assertion that the tongue is untamable by mankind to demonstrate that radical silence and absolute reliance on divine grace are necessary to prevent the same mouth from producing both the sweet water of divine praise and the bitter water of worldly cursing.

9 tradiciones más leen este capítulo.

Inicia sesión para leer las 12 →

Todas las traducciones

El mismo capítulo en 7 traducciones de dominio público.

WEB · World English Bible

1Let not many of you be teachers, my brothers, knowing that we will receive heavier judgment. 2For we all stumble in many things. Anyone who doesn’t stumble in word is a perfect person, able to bridle the whole body also. 3Indeed, we put bits into the horses’ mouths so that they may obey us, and we guide their whole body. 4Behold, the ships also, though they are so big and are driven by fierce winds, are yet guided by a very small rudder, wherever the pilot desires. 5So the tongue is also a little member, and boasts great things. See how a small fire can spread to a large forest! 6And the tongue is a fire. The world of iniquity among our members is the tongue, which defiles the whole body, and sets on fire the course of nature, and is set on fire by Gehenna. 7For every kind of animal, bird, creeping thing, and sea creature is tamed, and has been tamed by mankind; 8but nobody can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison. 9With it we bless our God and Father, and with it we curse men who are made in the image of God. 10Out of the same mouth comes blessing and cursing. My brothers, these things ought not to be so. 11Does a spring send out from the same opening fresh and bitter water? 12Can a fig tree, my brothers, yield olives, or a vine figs? Thus no spring yields both salt water and fresh water. 13Who is wise and understanding among you? Let him show by his good conduct that his deeds are done in gentleness of wisdom. 14But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your heart, don’t boast and don’t lie against the truth. 15This wisdom is not that which comes down from above, but is earthly, sensual, and demonic. 16For where jealousy and selfish ambition are, there is confusion and every evil deed. 17But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceful, gentle, reasonable, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. 18Now the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace.

KJV · King James Version

1My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation. 2For in many things we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body. 3Behold, we put bits in the horses’ mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn about their whole body. 4Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm, whithersoever the governor listeth. 5Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth! 6And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell. 7For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind: 8But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. 9Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God. 10Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be. 11Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter? 12Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs? so can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh. 13Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? let him shew out of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom. 14But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth. 15This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish. 16For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work. 17But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. 18And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.

5 traducciones más para comparar lado a lado.

Inicia sesión para comparar las 7 →
Diferencias que cambian el significado (29)
  • v1 [textual]: reads 'we will/shall receive' versus 'you receive' based on a manuscript difference — “we shall” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “will” (WEB) vs “greater judgment” (YLT) vs “you” (DRC)
  • v3 [textual]: reads 'Behold' versus 'If' or 'Now if' based on a manuscript difference — “Behold” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Indeed” (WEB) vs “Now if” (ASV) vs “lo the bits” (YLT) vs “For if” (DRC)
  • v3 [stylistic]: phrasing variations between singular 'body', plural 'bodies', or inclusion of 'also' — “body” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “also” (ASV) vs “we turn about” (YLT) vs “bodies” (DARBY)
  • v4 [lexical]: synonymous adjectives for the severity of the winds — “by” (WEB, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “are driven of fierce” (KJV) vs “by rough” (ASV) vs “by violent” (DARBY) vs “by strong” (DRC)
  • v4 [lexical]: 'helm' versus 'rudder' and archaic versus modern adverbs — “helm whithersoever” (KJV, YLT, DRC) vs “rudder wherever” (WEB, DARBY) vs “rudder whither” (ASV) vs “withersoever” (WEBSTER)
  • v6 [lexical]: synonymous translations of the verb for setting on fire or inflaming — “setteth on fire” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “sets” (WEB) vs “is setting” (YLT) vs “which sets to” (DARBY) vs “inflameth” (DRC)
  • v6 [lexical]: literal 'wheel' versus metaphorical 'course' — “course” (WEB, KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “wheel” (ASV, DRC)
  • v6 [interpretive]: translating 'Gehenna' as 'hell' versus transliterating it — “of hell” (KJV, DARBY) vs “by” (ASV, DRC) vs “by Gehenna” (WEB) vs “by the gehenna” (YLT) vs “from” (WEBSTER)
  • v7 [lexical]: synonymous nouns for 'nature', 'kind', or 'species' — “kind” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “nature both” (YLT) vs “species both” (DARBY) vs “nature” (DRC)
  • v8 [lexical]: synonymous phrasing for causing death — “deadly” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “death-bringing” (DARBY)
  • v9 [stylistic]: synonymous prepositions or adverbs indicating instrumentality — “Therewith bless” (KJV, ASV, DARBY) vs “With it” (WEB, YLT) vs “With this” (WEBSTER) vs “By it” (DRC)
  • v9 [textual]: reads 'Lord' versus 'God' based on a manuscript difference — “Lord and” (ASV, DARBY) vs “bless our and” (WEB) vs “God even the” (KJV) vs “do bless God and” (YLT) vs “bless” (WEBSTER) vs “bless and” (DRC)
  • v9 [lexical]: synonymous prepositions indicating likeness or pattern — “after” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “in” (WEB) vs “according to” (YLT)
  • v9 [lexical]: synonymous nouns for 'likeness' or 'similitude' — “similitude” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “likeness” (ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “image” (WEB)
  • v10 [lexical]: synonymous verbs for proceeding or coming out — “proceedeth” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “comes” (WEB) vs “cometh forth” (ASV) vs “doth come forth” (YLT) vs “goes forth” (DARBY)
  • v10 [stylistic]: archaic 'brethren' versus modern 'brothers', with minor syntactic shifts — “brethren” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “brothers” (WEB) vs “that” (DARBY)
  • v11 [lexical]: synonymous nouns for a spring's opening or hole, with minor word order differences — “place sweet water” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “opening fresh” (WEB) vs “opening” (ASV) vs “opening pour forth the” (YLT) vs “opening pour forth” (DARBY) vs “hole” (DRC)
  • v13 [lexical]: synonymous terms for possessing understanding or intelligence — “understanding” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “endued with knowledge” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “intelligent” (YLT)
  • v13 [grammatical]: differing prepositions indicating source or means of showing — “show by his” (WEB, ASV) vs “shew out of a” (KJV, DARBY) vs “the” (YLT) vs “show by” (WEBSTER) vs “by” (DRC)
  • v13 [lexical]: archaic 'conversation' versus modern equivalents like 'conduct' or 'behavior' — “conversation” (KJV, DARBY, DRC) vs “conduct that” (WEB) vs “life” (ASV) vs “behaviour” (YLT) vs “deportment” (WEBSTER)
  • v14 [stylistic]: archaic 'ye' versus modern 'you', with minor word order differences — “ye” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB, DRC) vs “bitter zeal” (YLT)
  • v14 [lexical]: (vv 14, 16) synonymous terms for selfish ambition, strife, or contention — “strife” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “selfish ambition” (WEB) vs “faction” (ASV) vs “rivalry” (YLT) vs “there be contentions” (DRC)
  • v15 [grammatical]: translating a participle as an active verb versus a state of being — “is” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “wisdom descendeth” (KJV, WEBSTER)
  • v15 [lexical]: synonymous adjectives for 'sensual/natural' and 'demonic' — “sensual devilish” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “and demonic” (WEB) vs “physical demon-like” (YLT) vs “natural” (DARBY) vs “demoniacal” (WEBSTER)
  • v16 [lexical]: synonymous nouns for jealousy, envy, or zeal — “envying” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “jealousy” (WEB, ASV) vs “zeal” (YLT) vs “emulation” (DARBY)
  • v16 [lexical]: synonymous nouns for disorder, confusion, or instability — “confusion” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “insurrection” (YLT) vs “disorder” (DARBY) vs “inconstancy” (DRC)
  • v16 [lexical]: synonymous nouns for a bad deed, work, or matter — “evil work” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “deed” (WEB) vs “vile deed” (ASV) vs “matter” (YLT) vs “thing” (DARBY)
  • v17 [lexical]: synonymous terms for purity or chastity — “pure” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “indeed is” (YLT) vs “is” (DARBY) vs “indeed is chaste” (DRC)
  • v18 [lexical]: differing translations of the same Greek conjunction — “And” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Now” (WEB) vs “But” (DARBY)

Detrás de esta página

Texto fuente. Greek (TAGNT, public-domain critical text). Public domain Greek text (Nestle-Aland/SBL/WH tradition with some specific reading choices).

Nombres divinos: Kyrios (Lord), Theos (God).

También consultado, pero no incluido en el consenso

Academic textual-historical analysis

James 3 is widely recognized by historical-critical scholars as a classic example of Hellenistic Jewish wisdom literature, utilizing the form of paraenesis and the style of the Greco-Roman diatribe. Verses 1-12 focus on the dangers of the tongue (speech ethics), a common topos in both Jewish wisdom (e.g., Proverbs, Sirach) and Greco-Roman moral philosophy. The imagery of the horse's bit, the ship's rudder, and the small fire kindling a forest (3:3-5) are well-documented stock metaphors in Hellenistic rhetoric. A major philological crux is the phrase 'the wheel of nature' or 'wheel of birth' (ton trochon tēs geneseōs) in verse 6, a unique expression in the New Testament with probable roots in Orphic, Pythagorean, or broader Hellenistic cosmology, adapted here to describe the destructive, systemic spread of malicious speech. The section concludes (3:13-18) with a 'two ways' schema contrasting earthly, demonic wisdom with wisdom 'from above,' reflecting Jewish apocalyptic and wisdom dualism similar to Qumran literature.

Jewish interpretation

Because James is a New Testament epistle, it is not part of the Jewish canon (the Tanakh) and possesses no authoritative status in Jewish religious life. Historically, Jewish scholars read James 3 as a Jewish wisdom discourse from the late Second Temple period. The text heavily utilizes traditional Jewish wisdom forms, drawing on imagery akin to Proverbs and Ben Sira to address the severe dangers of the 'evil tongue' (lashon hara) and to contrast heavenly wisdom with earthly, envy-driven wisdom.

Latter-day Saint

James 3 addresses the moral and spiritual weight of speech and the contrast between earthly and heavenly wisdom. The author warns that teachers face stricter judgment and vividly compares the tongue to a horse's bit, a ship's rudder, and a destructive fire. It highlights the ethical hypocrisy of praising God while cursing fellow humans, concluding by contrasting jealous, earthly wisdom with pure, peaceable wisdom originating from above.

Jehovah's Witnesses

In its immediate context, James 3 is a wisdom instruction concerning the disproportionate power of human speech and the contrast between earthly and heavenly wisdom. The author warns that teachers face stricter judgment because of their frequent use of speech. Employing analogies of horses' bits, ships' rudders, and small sparks, the text demonstrates how the small tongue controls the whole body and can cause immense destruction, described as being 'set on fire by Gehenna.' James argues that blessing God and cursing humans made in His image is a profound contradiction, contrary to the natural order seen in springs and fruit trees. Finally, the chapter contrasts bitter, jealous earthly wisdom with the pure, peaceable, and merciful wisdom that comes from above.

Decisiones de traducción que tomó la NCB (39)
  • v1: "we will receive" — Follows the first-person plural future indicative of the critical Greek text rather than variants reading second-person.
  • v1: "should become" — Accurately renders the present imperative in contemporary English syntax.
  • v1: "greater judgment" — A broad reception affirms that teachers face a heavier judgment; this rendering conveys the magnitude accurately.
  • v2: "we all stumble" — Disputed among traditions; rendered directly without softening the action to leave implications for perfect law-keeping open.
  • v2: "perfect man" — Disputed among traditions regarding Christian perfection; translates anēr as man to maintain the exact terminology of the debate.
  • v3: "Now if" — Adopts the conditional conjunction from the source text over variants that use the interjection for behold.
  • v3: "bridles" — Preserves the cognate root shared with the verb to bridle in the preceding verse.
  • v3: "body" — Translates the singular noun precisely without harmonizing to the plural subjects.
  • v4: "fierce" — Captures the harsh, unyielding nature of the winds described by the Greek adjective.
  • v4: "rudder" — Employs modern nautical terminology for the steering mechanism.
  • v5: "how great ... how great" — Preserves the wordplay of the repeated adjective denoting magnitude.
  • v6: "setting on fire" — Preserves the active participle to mirror the subsequent passive participle and maintain the cognate pattern.
  • v6: "wheel" — Retains the literal translation of the unique Hellenistic cosmological metaphor recognized in scholarship.
  • v6: "Gehenna" — Interpretive choice to transliterate the specific apocalyptic source term rather than generalize it.
  • v7: "nature" — Preserves the deliberate repetition when contrasting animal nature with human nature in the source text.
  • v8: "no one among humans is able to tame" — A broad reception affirms that mastery over the tongue cannot be accomplished by human nature alone; rendered to clarify that human effort is universally insufficient.
  • v8: "deadly" — Uses the standard contemporary English equivalent for death-bearing.
  • v9: "With it" — Modern English phrasing replacing the archaic instrumental adverb.
  • v9: "the Lord" — Interpretive choice to consistently render the specific divine name Kyrios as Lord, following the map.
  • v9: "according to" — Accurately renders the preposition kata denoting pattern or standard.
  • v9: "likeness" — Matches the specific Greek noun for likeness rather than adopting a broader synonym.
  • v9: "we curse humans" — Disputed among traditions as to whether this completely negates the blessing offered to God; rendered inclusively to encompass all image-bearers.
  • v10: "comes" — Direct, modern translation of the verb for coming out.
  • v10: "brothers" — Modernizes the plural address while maintaining the relational terminology.
  • v11: "A spring does not pour forth ... does it?" — Precisely renders the Greek rhetorical question particle expecting a negative answer.
  • v11: "opening" — Conveys the sense of a spring's fissure clearly and naturally in contemporary English.
  • v12: "So neither can a spring produce salt and sweet water" — Translates the exact Greek text provided which includes the noun for spring rather than following variant manuscript omissions.
  • v13: "understanding" — Provides a standard, dignified translation for practical insight and expertise.
  • v13: "show by" — Translates the preposition dynamically as means to suit modern English syntax.
  • v13: "conduct" — Replaces the archaic use of conversation with a modern equivalent for way of life.
  • v14: "you" — Uses the modern second-person pronoun.
  • v14: "selfish ambition" — Better reflects the Greek term's association with self-seeking maneuvering.
  • v15: "coming down" — Translates the participle directly to describe the origin of the wisdom.
  • v15: "natural" — Disputed among traditions regarding autonomous secular reasoning; rendered as natural to contrast with spiritual without imposing an inherently sexual connotation.
  • v16: "instability" — Preserves the cognate root connection with the adjective unstable/restless in verse 8.
  • v16: "vile deed" — Captures the base, worthless quality of the actions described.
  • v17: "pure" — Denotes broader moral and spiritual cleanliness suited to wisdom.
  • v17: "the wisdom from above" — Disputed among traditions regarding whether this is uncreated grace or a definitive catalog of holy tempers; preserves the direct noun phrase.
  • v18: "And" — Serves as a mild continuative moving into the closing summary.
Límites que vale la pena conocer
  • This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
  • The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
  • The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
  • The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
  • One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
  • The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
  • Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
  • The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.

Ver el proceso completo paso a paso → · Generado por IA el Oct 21, 2026, gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)