← Retour à Luc 10 · Page d’étude complète de Luc 10
Comment le consensus pour Luc 10 a été établi
Chaque étape du processus, exactement telle qu’elle s’est déroulée. Rien ici n’est édité manuellement : les traductions proviennent de la base de données de cette application, la lecture de chaque tradition a été générée par des appels isolés qui ne se voient pas entre eux (l’isolation empêche l’ancrage ; elle n’en fait pas des témoins indépendants), et le consensus a été synthétisé uniquement à partir de ces lectures.
- Modèle :
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)
- Généré :
- Oct 21, 2026, 4:30 AM UTC
- Method:
- claim-audited, source-language-based, family-weighted
Étape 1Lire le passage dans chaque traduction du domaine public
7 translations, fed to every step. The AI-generated NCB is never a source.
WEB · World English Bible
KJV · King James Version
ASV · American Standard Version
YLT · Young's Literal Translation
Darby · Darby Translation
Webster · Webster Bible
DRC · Douay-Rheims (Challoner)
Étape 2Each eligible tradition reads the chapter — 12 voting profiles across 3 families
Profils isolés générés par l’IA qui ne se voient pas les uns les autres. Sensibles aux genres littéraires, et honnêtes concernant le matériel limité.
Ancient Communions · The undivided-church and pre-Reformation episcopal traditions.
Catholicaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Roman Catholic tradition drawing on both Latin AND Eastern Catholic sources — and actually showing the Eastern dimension, not merely promising it: Scripture within Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium (the Catechism, the Latin Fathers, Augustine, Aquinas and the scholastics, the councils) together with the Eastern Catholic churches in communion with Rome and the Greek and Syriac Fathers they share. Sacramental and typological reading. Distinguish teaching shared across the whole Catholic communion from emphases specific to the Latin or to the Eastern Catholic churches.
Sens immédiat — In Luke 10, Jesus appoints and sends out seventy (or seventy-two) disciples ahead of him, instructing them to travel lightly, preach the nearness of the kingdom, and heal the sick. He pronounces woes upon Galilean cities that reject his works, warning that rejecting his emissaries equates to rejecting him and the Father. The disciples return rejoicing over their authority over demons, but Jesus redirects their joy to their heavenly citizenship, thanking the Father for revealing these truths to "babes" rather than the wise. In response to a lawyer testing him about eternal life and the definition of a neighbor, Jesus delivers the parable of the Good Samaritan, where an outcast exhibits true mercy to a beaten traveler after religious figures pass by. The chapter concludes in Bethany, where Jesus visits the home of Martha and Mary; Martha serves anxiously while Mary listens to his teaching, prompting Jesus to declare that Mary has chosen the "good part."
Reception — The Catholic tradition receives this chapter as a profound repository of ecclesiology, Christology, and spiritual theology, utilizing both literal and highly developed typological exegesis. The sending of the seventy (or seventy-two) is viewed as the prefiguration of the broader presbyterate and the universal mission of the Church. The Eastern Catholic churches preserve a robust liturgical veneration of this group, celebrating the "Synaxis of the Seventy Apostles" (found in the Byzantine Synaxarion), whereas the Latin tradition often focuses on how this expanded mission supports the hierarchical structure. Jesus' declaration, "He that heareth you, heareth me" (Luke 10:16), forms a cornerstone for the Catholic understanding of the Magisterium. The Second Vatican Council invokes this verse in Lumen Gentium to affirm that the bishops, as successors of the apostles, speak with the authority of Christ himself. The parable of the Good Samaritan has been universally read through a Christological and sacramental lens since the patristic era. Origen and Augustine articulate the classic typology: the man going down from Jerusalem to Jericho is fallen humanity (Adam) descending into the mortality of the world; the robbers are demonic powers who strip him of grace; the priest and Levite represent the inability of the Old Law to save. The Good Samaritan is Christ himself, who binds the wounds with the oil of comfort and the wine of exhortation. The inn is the Church, and the innkeeper represents the apostolic ministers to whom Christ entrusts humanity until his return, leaving the two denarii (variously interpreted as the two Testaments, the two commandments of love, or the sacraments). The narrative of Martha and Mary is the classic scriptural locus for distinguishing the active and contemplative lives. Gregory the Great established the paradigm for the West: Martha's anxious service represents the active life of corporal works, while Mary's sitting at Jesus' feet represents the contemplative life of prayer and beholding God. Thomas Aquinas synthesizes this tradition, arguing that while both are holy and necessary, the contemplative life is objectively higher (the "one thing needful") because it engages the highest human faculties and is the only part that continues into eternity.
Application — The tradition applies Luke 10 by intertwining sacramental healing, apostolic obedience, and the rhythm of prayer and action. The oil and wine of the Good Samaritan are directly applied to the Church's sacramental life, particularly the Anointing of the Sick and the Eucharist, where Christ continues to act as the Divine Physician binding up the wounds of sin. Believers are called to imitate the Good Samaritan through the corporal and spiritual works of mercy, recognizing Christ in the marginalized. At the same time, the Church applies the lesson of Martha and Mary to structure religious life and the daily spirituality of the laity. Monastic and contemplative orders see their specific vocation validated in Mary's choice, while active orders and lay apostolates strive for a "mixed life" where action flows from contemplation. Finally, the faithful are taught to receive the teachings of their bishops with the obedience of faith, trusting the promise of Luke 10:16 that listening to the Magisterium is listening to Christ.
Autorités citées :Byzantine Rite Liturgical Tradition — Synaxarion · Second Vatican Council — Lumen Gentium · Origen — Homilies on Luke · Augustine — Quaestiones Evangeliorum · Gregory the Great — Homilies on Ezekiel · Thomas Aquinas — Summa Theologiae
audit au niveau des affirmations (5 vérifications)
- ✓ The sending of the seventy establishes a foundation for the broader apostolic mi
- ✓ Luke 10:16 serves as a foundational text for the teaching authority of the Magis
- ✓ The parable of the Good Samaritan is interpreted typologically, where Christ is
- ✓ The episode of Martha and Mary provides the scriptural paradigm for distinguishi
- ✓ The Church applies the Samaritan's oil and wine to her sacramental ministries of
Eastern Orthodoxaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Eastern Orthodox tradition: Scripture within Holy Tradition and the consensus of the Fathers (patristic consensus). Emphases on theosis, the liturgy, the Septuagint text, apophatic mystery over precise definition, and the seven Ecumenical Councils.
Sens immédiat — Jesus expands his ministry by appointing seventy disciples, sending them in pairs to prepare the towns for his arrival, warning them of the dangers and rejections they will face, and granting them authority over evil. Upon their joyful return, he directs their rejoicing toward their heavenly citizenship. He then answers a lawyer's test by defining neighborly love through the parable of the Good Samaritan, transcending ethnic and religious boundaries. Finally, in the home of Martha and Mary, Jesus corrects Martha's anxious hospitality, affirming Mary's choice to sit and listen to his word as the 'one thing needful.'
Reception — The Eastern Orthodox tradition reads this chapter through a deeply Christological, ecclesiological, and ascetic lens. The sending of the Seventy (vv. 1-17) is viewed as foundational for apostolic succession and the expansive mission of the Church, formally commemorated in the liturgical calendar as the Synaxis of the Seventy Apostles. The parable of the Good Samaritan (vv. 30-37) is universally interpreted through a patristic allegorical consensus: the man traveling is Adam (representing all humanity); Jerusalem is Paradise; Jericho is the fallen world; the robbers are demons who strip humanity of grace and leave it 'half dead' (spiritually wounded but still retaining the image of God). The Priest and Levite represent the Old Covenant Law and Prophets, which are powerless to save. The Samaritan is Christ himself, who binds up human wounds with the healing mysteries (sacraments) of oil (chrism/unction) and wine (the Eucharist), placing the man in the inn, which represents the Church. The account of Martha and Mary (vv. 38-42) forms the scriptural bedrock for Orthodox asceticism, establishing the vital distinction between praxis (active service) and theoria (contemplation). While Martha's service is honorable, Mary's choice to sit at the Lord's feet is championed by hesychast theology as the superior path of inner stillness, spiritual vision, and unceasing prayer.
Application — Liturgically, the pericope of Martha and Mary (vv. 38-42) is the appointed Gospel reading for all major feasts of the Theotokos (the Virgin Mary), such as the Dormition and her Nativity. The Church typologically connects Mary of Bethany's receptive listening to the Mother of God's supreme obedience and containment of the Word. Ascetically, the 'one thing needful' is a constant pastoral exhortation for monastics and lay faithful alike to guard the heart against the 'many things' of worldly distraction. The Good Samaritan provides the framework for Orthodox philanthropy and hospital ministries, while also reminding the faithful of their constant need for the healing 'oil and wine' found in the sacramental life of the Church.
Autorités citées :Origen — Homilies on Luke · Gregory Palamas — The Triads · Eastern Orthodox Liturgical Tradition — Menaion
audit au niveau des affirmations (7 vérifications)
- ✓ The seventy disciples are foundational figures of the Church, commemorated litur
- ✓ The man traveling from Jerusalem to Jericho represents Adam and fallen humanity,
- ✓ The Priest and the Levite signify the Old Testament Law and Prophets, which cann
- ✓ The Good Samaritan is recognized as Jesus Christ, who rescues humanity and bring
- ✓ The oil and wine poured on the man's wounds represent the sacramental mysteries
- ✓ Martha and Mary represent the concepts of praxis (action) and theoria (contempla
- ✓ The story of Martha and Mary is the primary festal Gospel reading for commemorat
Oriental Orthodoxaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Oriental Orthodox tradition (Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac): Scripture within the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils and the miaphysite Fathers (Athanasius, Cyril of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch). Deeply liturgical, ascetic, and typological reading; some of these churches hold wider canons.
Sens immédiat — In this narrative chapter, Jesus commissions seventy (or seventy-two) laborers for an urgent preaching and healing mission, warning them of rejection but granting them spiritual authority. Upon their joyful return, He speaks of witnessing Satan's fall and emphasizes that rejoicing should be rooted in salvation rather than spiritual power. He then blesses the Father for revealing truth to the humble ('babes') and asserts His unique, mutual knowledge with the Father. Challenged by a lawyer, Jesus redefines 'neighbor' through the Parable of the Good Samaritan. Finally, in the home of Martha and Mary, He praises Mary's choice of contemplative listening over Martha's anxious service.
Reception — The Oriental Orthodox tradition receives this chapter through profoundly typological, Christological, and ascetic lenses. Severus of Antioch heavily influenced the miaphysite reading of the Good Samaritan (vv. 30-37), establishing it as a grand, comprehensive typology of the economy of salvation. The man journeying down from Jerusalem is Adam descending from Paradise to the world (Jericho); the robbers are the demons who strip humanity of grace and virtue; the priest and Levite represent the Law and the Prophets, which observed humanity's spiritual death but lacked the power to heal it. Christ is the Good Samaritan—a foreigner to human sin—who binds humanity's wounds with the oil of the Holy Spirit (or mercy) and the wine of the Eucharist (or discipline), carrying him on His own 'beast' (His incarnate flesh) to the inn, which represents the Church. Christologically, Cyril of Alexandria reads verses 21-22 to defend the unified, incarnate Word. When Jesus says 'All things have been delivered to me,' Cyril insists He speaks economically according to His assumed humanity, while 'no one knows the Son except the Father' demonstrates His divine consubstantiality, requiring no division of subjects. Additionally, verses 18-19 ('tread on serpents and scorpions') are foundational for the Coptic and Syriac theology of spiritual warfare, framed by Athanasius as Christ breaking demonic dominion and transferring this authority to the faithful ascetic.
Application — Liturgically, the Parable of the Good Samaritan is a focal point of the Lenten lectionary in the Coptic Orthodox Church, read to guide the faithful to identify as the wounded traveler desperately needing the medicine of the Great Physician before Pascha. The innkeeper's two denarii are often interpreted as the Old and New Testaments given to the bishops to care for the flock. In the monastic application, the Mary and Martha pericope (vv. 38-42) serves as a primary charter for ascetic life. Coptic and Syriac spiritual masters exhort monks and nuns to choose 'the good part' of silent contemplation at the feet of Christ, viewing active service (Martha) as necessary for communal life but recognizing unceasing prayer and attentiveness to the Word (Mary) as the supreme, eternal vocation.
Autorités citées :Severus of Antioch — Cathedral Homilies · Cyril of Alexandria — Commentary on Luke · Athanasius of Alexandria — Life of Antony · Isaac the Syrian — Ascetical Homilies
audit au niveau des affirmations (8 vérifications)
- ✓ Jesus grants the seventy disciples authority over demonic powers but roots their
- ✓ The Parable of the Good Samaritan functions as a complete typology of the fall a
- ✓ The priest and Levite in the parable symbolize the Old Testament Law and Prophet
- ✓ The 'inn' in the Good Samaritan narrative is typologically identified as the Chu
- ✓ Christ's statement that all things are delivered to Him and His unique knowledge
- ✓ The declaration of seeing Satan fall like lightning and gaining power over scorp
- ✓ The Good Samaritan pericope is applied liturgically during Lent as an invitation
- ✓ The narrative of Mary and Martha is applied as an ascetic ideal, elevating silen
Reformation Traditions · The magisterial churches of the sixteenth-century Reformation.
Anglican / Episcopalaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Anglican tradition (including the Episcopal Church): Scripture read with tradition and reason (Hooker); the Book of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles; a comprehensiveness spanning evangelical, anglo-catholic, and broad/progressive readings — name that spectrum where the passage has been read across it.
Sens immédiat — Luke 10 narrates the expansion of Jesus' ministry through the sending out of the seventy (or seventy-two) disciples to prepare his way, instructing them to travel lightly, depend on hospitality, and proclaim the nearness of the Kingdom. Upon their joyful return, Jesus declares the defeat of Satan and rejoices that God's purposes are revealed to the humble rather than the wise. The chapter then moves to Jesus' teaching on the law of love through the Parable of the Good Samaritan, which redefines 'neighbor' across profound ethnic and religious boundaries as the one who demonstrates mercy. Finally, the narrative contrasts the sisters Martha and Mary, with Jesus commending Mary's contemplative posture of listening at his feet over Martha's anxious, distracted service.
Reception — The Anglican reception of Luke 10 spans its comprehensive spectrum, holding evangelism, sacramental theology, and social action in tension. Evangelicals have historically drawn on the sending of the seventy (vv. 1-9) as a mandate for lay ministry and global mission, emphasizing that the command to pray for 'laborers' extends beyond the ordained episcopate. Anglo-Catholics, leaning on patristic tradition, have often embraced an allegorical reading of the Good Samaritan (vv. 30-37), viewing the Samaritan as Christ healing fallen humanity, the oil and wine as the sacraments, and the inn as the Church—a reading present in the sermons of the Oxford Movement. Broad Church and progressive wings, particularly through the 20th-century Social Gospel movement, read the Good Samaritan as the foundational mandate for structural social justice, arguing that neighbor-love requires systemic care for the vulnerable. The narrative of Martha and Mary (vv. 38-42) has been central to Anglican reflections on the balance of life; while the 19th-century revival of religious orders championed Mary's 'better part' as a defense of the contemplative vocation, modern progressive readings have frequently reappraised Martha's 'diakonia' (service) to validate and elevate women's active leadership in the church.
Application — Liturgically, the Book of Common Prayer (1662) appoints the Parable of the Good Samaritan for the Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity, pairing it with a collect praying for the grace to serve God faithfully, thereby framing neighborly love as an act dependent on divine grace rather than mere moralism. The injunction to pray the Lord of the harvest to send laborers (v. 2) is classically applied during Ember Days, directing the church to pray for vocations and ordinations. In spiritual direction, Anglican pastoral practice frequently uses Martha and Mary to counsel an integrated rule of life, warning against the activism of Martha untethered from the contemplative prayer of Mary.
Autorités citées :Book of Common Prayer (1662) — The Book of Common Prayer · William Temple — Christianity and Social Order · John Keble — Sermons for the Christian Year · Evelyn Underhill — The Spiritual Life
audit au niveau des affirmations (6 vérifications)
- ✓ Jesus sends out the seventy to proclaim the nearness of the Kingdom of God, an a
- ✓ The command to pray the Lord of the harvest for laborers is used liturgically to
- ✓ The Good Samaritan parable redefines 'neighbor' beyond ethnic boundaries to anyo
- ✓ The Samaritan healing the traveler is interpreted allegorically as Christ bringi
- ✓ The narrative of the Samaritan is viewed as the primary biblical imperative for
- ✓ Jesus' commendation of Mary over Martha establishes a tension between the contem
Lutheranaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Lutheran tradition (the Book of Concord): the law–gospel distinction, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura held with the ecumenical creeds, the theology of the cross, and sacramental realism.
Sens immédiat — The chapter recounts Jesus expanding his mission by commissioning seventy emissaries to preach the kingdom of God, granting them authority over demons and warning that those who reject them reject him. Upon their joyful return, Jesus praises the Father for revealing hidden truths to the lowly rather than the wise. He then answers a lawyer testing him about eternal life, using the parable of the Good Samaritan to illustrate the absolute demands of neighborly love. Finally, he visits the home of Martha and Mary, commending Mary for choosing the one necessary thing by listening to his teaching while Martha was distracted by service.
Reception — Lutheran reception of Luke 10 relies heavily on the law-gospel distinction and sacramental realism. Jesus' assertion in verse 16, 'He who hears you hears me,' is foundational for the Lutheran understanding of the Office of the Holy Ministry; Melanchthon in the Apology of the Augsburg Confession uses this to argue that pastors do not represent their own persons but act in the stead and by the command of Christ, guaranteeing the objective efficacy of the preached Word and Absolution. The dialogue with the lawyer (verses 25-29) is seen as a textbook application of the Law. Because the lawyer desires to justify himself, Jesus applies the Law strictly ('Do this, and you will live') not to show a path to salvation, but as a mirror to crush his self-righteousness and reveal his inability to perfectly love God and neighbor. Luther's Church Postil famously reads the subsequent Good Samaritan parable (verses 30-37) typologically: the half-dead man is the sinner completely ruined by original sin; the priest and Levite represent the Law, which can diagnose but never cure; and the Samaritan is Christ Himself, who binds up the sinner's wounds, pouring in the oil and wine of the Gospel and the Sacraments. Finally, the account of Mary and Martha (verses 38-42) is interpreted as the priority of receptive faith over active works. Mary sitting at Jesus' feet to hear the Word is the 'one thing needful' (justification by faith), which must precede and anchor all subsequent Christian service (Martha's domain).
Application — In preaching and pastoral care, Lutheran pastors explicitly avoid moralizing the Good Samaritan parable into a mere command to do good, as this would produce works-righteousness. Instead, it is preached first to expose the congregation's failure to love perfectly, leaving them as the half-dead man, and second to offer comfort by pointing to Christ as the true Samaritan who rescues them through the means of grace. Verse 16 is applied to assure penitents that when the pastor pronounces the absolution, it is as certain in heaven as if Christ dealt with them personally. The Mary and Martha narrative is frequently applied to underscore the centrality of the Divine Service, reminding the faithful that their primary duty is to receive Christ's gifts through the hearing of the Word before turning to the anxieties and tasks of their daily vocations.
Autorités citées :Philip Melanchthon — Apology of the Augsburg Confession · Martin Luther — Church Postil
audit au niveau des affirmations (4 vérifications)
- ✓ The declaration 'He who hears you hears me' serves as a primary authorization fo
- ✓ Jesus' response to the lawyer ('Do this, and you will live') functions as the th
- ✓ The Good Samaritan is Christologically typologized as Jesus rescuing the spiritu
- ✓ Mary's posture of listening represents the primacy of receiving justification th
Reformed / Presbyterianaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Reformed tradition (Calvin; the Westminster Standards; the Heidelberg and Belgic confessions): the sovereignty of God and covenant theology, a redemptive-historical reading of Scripture, and the regulative principle.
Sens immédiat — In Luke 10, Jesus expands His earthly ministry by commissioning seventy disciples to preach the nearness of the kingdom and heal the sick, warning that cities rejecting them will face severer judgment than Sodom. When the seventy return marveling at their authority over demons, Jesus directs their joy away from spiritual power and toward their secure standing before God. He then rejoices in the Spirit, declaring that the Father has sovereignly hidden the truth from the wise and revealed it to 'babes.' A lawyer tests Jesus regarding eternal life; Jesus points him to the demands of the Law and tells the Parable of the Good Samaritan to shatter the lawyer's narrow definition of 'neighbor.' Finally, visiting the home of Martha and Mary, Jesus elevates Mary's posture of hearing His word over Martha's anxious service.
Reception — The Reformed tradition reads Luke 10 as a profound declaration of divine sovereignty, covenantal law-gospel distinctions, and the primacy of the Word. Verses 21-22 form a cornerstone for the Reformed doctrine of unconditional election and reprobation. John Calvin and the Canons of Dort lean heavily on Christ's thanksgiving to demonstrate that the revelation of the gospel to some ('babes') and the withholding of it from others ('the wise') rests entirely on the 'good pleasure' of God's will, independent of human merit or foreseen faith. In the exchange with the lawyer (vv. 25-28), Reformed federal (covenant) theology discerns the pedagogical use of the Law. When Jesus says, 'This do, and thou shalt live,' theologians like Francis Turretin understand Him to be articulating the strict demand of the Covenant of Works. Jesus is not offering a realistic path to justification for fallen humanity, but rather wielding the perfect standard of the Law to crush the lawyer's self-righteousness ('willing to justify himself') and expose his total inability to save himself. Regarding the Parable of the Good Samaritan (vv. 30-37), the Reformed tradition famously breaks from the medieval tradition of allegorizing the text. Where earlier theologians read the Samaritan as Christ, the inn as the Church, and the two denarii as the sacraments, Calvin’s grammatical-historical exegesis insists the parable is a straightforward, practical exposition of the moral law. It serves to define 'neighbor' universally, crossing ethnic and social boundaries, to show the impossible breadth of the law's demand for love. Furthermore, the account of Mary and Martha (vv. 38-42) is consistently interpreted to highlight the supreme necessity of sitting under the preached Word of God, establishing a paradigm for Reformed corporate worship and piety where the hearing of the Word is the 'one thing needful.'
Application — Pastoral application of Luke 10 in Reformed churches calls believers to find their ultimate assurance not in their spiritual gifts, successes, or ministries, but in God's immutable decree of election—that their 'names are written in heaven' (v. 20). The text prompts profound humility and gratitude that God has revealed Himself to the undeserving by His sovereign grace. Furthermore, it exhorts Christians to active, sacrificial mercy ministry to all people in distress, recognizing every human being as a neighbor, while prioritizing the reading and preaching of Scripture above the anxious busyness of daily life.
Autorités citées :John Calvin — Institutes of the Christian Religion · Synod of Dort — Canons of Dort · Francis Turretin — Institutes of Elenctic Theology · John Calvin — Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists
audit au niveau des affirmations (5 vérifications)
- ✓ The Father's hiding of truth from the wise and revealing it to babes proves that
- ✓ Jesus' statement 'this do, and you will live' is an expression of the Covenant o
- ✓ The Parable of the Good Samaritan is interpreted grammatically and historically
- ✓ Believers are commanded to find their highest joy and assurance in their uncondi
- ✓ The 'one thing needful' establishes the priority of sitting under the Word of Go
Free-Church & Revival Traditions · Believers'-church, revival, and restorationist movements.
Baptistaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Baptist tradition (e.g. the 1689 Second London Confession, the Baptist Faith & Message — note the range): believers' baptism, congregational polity, liberty of conscience, a memorial reading of the ordinances, and strong emphasis on personal conversion and biblical authority.
Sens immédiat — Luke 10 narrates the expansion of Jesus' ministry through the sending of seventy (or seventy-two) disciples to preach the nearness of the kingdom and heal the sick. Jesus frames their mission with a dual emphasis: the urgency of a plentiful harvest requiring laborers, and the certainty of judgment upon cities that reject the gospel message. Upon their joyful return, Jesus affirms their authority over demonic forces but redirects their joy to their assured salvation. He then prays, thanking the Father for revealing these truths to 'babes' rather than the wise, asserting his own unique relationship with the Father. The chapter concludes with two iconic narratives: the parable of the Good Samaritan, told to dismantle a lawyer's attempt at self-justification and to redefine neighborly love beyond ethnic and religious boundaries, and the account of Mary and Martha, which elevates devotion to Jesus' teaching over the distractions of hospitality.
Reception — Within the Baptist tradition, this chapter is a primary text for missiology, soteriology, and the doctrine of biblical authority. Verse 2 ('the harvest is plentiful') has historically animated Baptist missionary movements, functioning as a divine mandate for local congregations to raise up and send evangelists. Soteriologically, Calvinistic Baptists have drawn heavily on Jesus' words in verses 20-22. John Gill interpreted the names 'written in heaven' as a clear reference to eternal, unconditional election, and read Jesus' prayer thanking the Father for hiding truth from the wise as a demonstration of God's sovereign grace in personal conversion, independent of human merit. In the parable of the Good Samaritan (vv. 25-37), Baptists read a twofold theological function: first, Jesus uses the absolute demand of the law to crush the lawyer's self-justification, pointing to the necessity of grace; second, it provides a definitive ethic for Christian social action. Martin Luther King Jr. heavily relied on this parable to argue for a universal brotherhood and dangerous altruism that transcends racial divides. Finally, the Mary and Martha narrative (vv. 38-42) reinforces the Baptist distinctive of the primacy of the Word; C.H. Spurgeon argued that hearing the Word is the 'one thing needful,' emphasizing that personal communion with Christ supersedes even legitimate religious activism.
Application — Baptist congregations frequently apply verse 2 as a call to prayer for vocational ministers and global missionaries, often using it to anchor annual missions offerings. The Good Samaritan motivates local church initiatives in disaster relief, orphan care, and community service, framing social action as a necessary fruit of genuine conversion. Finally, pastors regularly preach the Mary and Martha account to urge believers to prioritize daily Bible reading and personal devotion, warning against the danger of burning out in church volunteerism at the expense of sitting at Jesus' feet.
Autorités citées :John Gill — Exposition of the New Testament · Martin Luther King Jr. — Strength to Love · C.H. Spurgeon — Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit
audit au niveau des affirmations (5 vérifications)
- ✓ Jesus' statement about the plentiful harvest is a primary mandate for raising up
- ✓ Rejoicing that names are written in heaven is interpreted as evidence of eternal
- ✓ Jesus' interaction with the lawyer serves to expose the impossibility of self-ju
- ✓ The Good Samaritan parable commands an ethic of universal compassion that crosse
- ✓ Mary's posture of listening to Jesus elevates personal devotion and the primacy
Methodist / Wesleyan / Holinessaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Wesleyan-Holiness tradition: prevenient grace and free response, sanctification and entire sanctification / Christian perfection, the Wesleyan quadrilateral (Scripture primary, with tradition, reason, and experience), and warm-hearted practical piety.
Sens immédiat — Luke 10 presents the expansion of Jesus' mission as he commissions seventy (or seventy-two) disciples to preach ahead of him, entirely dependent on local hospitality. Upon their joyful return, Jesus authenticates their authority over demonic forces but grounds their primary joy in their heavenly citizenship. The chapter then redefines the boundaries of the covenant community: first through the parable of the Good Samaritan, which elevates active, merciful compassion over ceremonial purity, and finally through the account of Mary and Martha, where Jesus affirms Mary's choice to sit as a disciple at his feet as the 'one thing needful'.
Reception — The Wesleyan-Holiness tradition receives this chapter as a foundational text for its missiology, its ethic of social holiness, and its doctrine of Christian perfection. The itinerant model of the seventy (vv. 1-11) deeply shaped early Methodism; leaders like Francis Asbury saw the unencumbered, traveling 'circuit rider' as a direct continuation of this biblical mandate to labor in a plentiful harvest. Theologically, the lawyer's summation of the law (v. 27) stands at the very center of Wesleyan soteriology: perfect love of God and neighbor is the exact definition of entire sanctification. John Wesley's commentary on the Good Samaritan emphasizes that 'neighbor' dissolves all ethnic, religious, and national boundaries, mandating a universal, practical love. Furthermore, Wesley read the 'one thing needful' (v. 42) as inward religion—the life of God in the soul. Historically, the tradition holds the Good Samaritan and Mary of Bethany together as the essential union of 'works of mercy' and 'works of piety,' refusing to separate warm-hearted practical action from inward sanctification. Additionally, verse 20 is read as an anchor for the doctrine of assurance, prioritizing the inward witness of the Spirit regarding salvation over the exercise of spiritual gifts or outward ministerial success.
Application — Application in the tradition focuses on the lifelong pursuit of warm-hearted practical piety. Believers are urged to sit at Jesus' feet like Mary to cultivate inward holiness through the spiritual disciplines (works of piety), recognizing that this 'one thing needful' fuels the outward, sacrificial compassion modeled by the Good Samaritan (works of mercy). Methodists apply the Samaritan narrative directly to social ethics, driving the establishment of hospitals, orphanages, and ministries to the marginalized as concrete expressions of perfect love. Pastors and evangelists apply the sending of the seventy as a continuing call to sacrificial, itinerant labor in a 'plentiful harvest,' relying faithfully on God's provision. Finally, believers are counseled to ground their spiritual joy not in their victories over systemic evil or personal spiritual power (though these are celebrated), but in the abiding assurance of their salvation—rejoicing that their names are written in heaven.
Autorités citées :John Wesley — Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament · Francis Asbury — Journal and Letters of Francis Asbury
audit au niveau des affirmations (5 vérifications)
- ✓ The sending of the seventy without provisions is a biblical blueprint for itiner
- ✓ The command to love God and neighbor with one's entire being is the essence and
- ✓ The Good Samaritan parable demands active, universal works of mercy that cross e
- ✓ The 'one thing needful' chosen by Mary signifies inward religion and the cultiva
- ✓ True spiritual joy and assurance must be rooted in heavenly citizenship rather t
Anabaptist / Mennoniteaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Anabaptist tradition (Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite): a Jesus-centered reading with the Sermon on the Mount as normative, believers' baptism, nonviolence and nonresistance, simple living, communal discernment, and the church as a visible community distinct from worldly power.
Sens immédiat — In Luke 10, Jesus expands his mission by sending out seventy (or seventy-two) disciples ahead of him. He explicitly instructs them to travel light, depend on local hospitality, and enter towns as 'lambs among wolves,' bearing only a message of peace and the nearness of God's kingdom. Rejection is to be met non-coercively by wiping the dust from their feet, leaving judgment to God. The chapter continues with the disciples' joyful return, Jesus' thanksgiving that God's revelation bypasses the worldly wise in favor of 'babes,' the Parable of the Good Samaritan which defines neighborly love across fierce ethnic boundaries, and the account of Mary and Martha, where Jesus elevates attentive listening to his word as the 'good part.'
Reception — The Anabaptist tradition has historically elevated Luke 10 as a foundational text for its ecclesiology of defenselessness (Wehrlosigkeit) and nonviolent discipleship. Verse 3 ('lambs among wolves') served as a critical differentiator for early Anabaptists. Menno Simons frequently cited this verse to argue that the true church is characterized by suffering rather than persecuting, contrasting the Anabaptist flock with both the state-aligned magisterial reformers and violent revolutionaries. The sending instructions (vv. 4-11) are received as a mandate for a non-coercive missiology; the gospel relies on peaceful witness, and rejection is met only by shaking off dust, never by the sword. Furthermore, the Parable of the Good Samaritan (vv. 25-37) is central to the tradition's emphasis on orthopraxy. The priest and Levite represent a dead, structural orthodoxy, while the Samaritan demonstrates active, risk-taking love. John Howard Yoder and other modern Mennonite theologians emphasize that this parable is not merely about generic charity, but actively subverts ethnic and nationalistic boundaries, proving that Jesus' command to love encompasses the historic and political enemy.
Application — Anabaptists apply this chapter by seeking to embody a visible, alternative community that operates without the security of worldly power. The instruction to go as 'lambs among wolves' (v. 3) shapes modern commitments to nonviolent peacemaking, pacifism, and unarmed Christian peacemaker teams in conflict zones. Discipleship is understood as inherently vulnerable. The Good Samaritan's example (vv. 33-37) drives the tradition's heavy investment in mutual aid, disaster relief (such as Mennonite Disaster Service), and restorative justice, insisting that faith must be proven by crossing socio-economic and cultural boundaries to care for the marginalized. Finally, Mary sitting at Jesus' feet (v. 39) is applied as the necessary contemplative foundation for this active peacemaking; believers must be deeply rooted in the teachings of Jesus rather than merely distracted by the anxious striving of the world (vv. 40-42).
Autorités citées :Menno Simons — Foundation of Christian Doctrine · Conrad Grebel — Letters to Thomas Müntzer · John Howard Yoder — The Politics of Jesus
audit au niveau des affirmations (5 vérifications)
- ✓ Jesus sends his disciples out in extreme vulnerability as 'lambs among wolves,'
- ✓ The disciples are instructed to respond to rejection not with force or coercion,
- ✓ The Parable of the Good Samaritan dismantles ethnic boundaries, requiring believ
- ✓ The command 'Go, and do thou likewise' forms the basis for modern Anabaptist com
- ✓ Mary's posture of listening to Jesus is the 'one thing needful,' serving as the
Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal tradition (Assemblies of God, Church of God, and kindred bodies): the present continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine healing, and expectancy of God's present action, read within Nicene Trinitarian faith. Do NOT attribute Word-of-Faith / prosperity or later neo-charismatic distinctives to classical Pentecostalism generally.
Sens immédiat — In this chapter, Jesus expands His missional delegation by appointing seventy (or seventy-two) disciples, sending them ahead of Him to preach the nearness of the Kingdom and to heal the sick. Upon their return, they marvel at their authority over demons, which Jesus affirms as a true delegation of power over the enemy, though He redirects their ultimate rejoicing to their salvation. Jesus then rejoices in the Holy Spirit, praising the Father for revealing these truths to the humble rather than the wise. The chapter concludes with the parable of the Good Samaritan, establishing a standard of active compassion, and the narrative of Mary and Martha, which elevates the posture of sitting at Jesus' feet to hear His word.
Reception — Classical Pentecostalism reads Luke 10 as a foundational text for the democratization and continuation of the miraculous gifts. The fact that Jesus commissions seventy disciples—not just the twelve apostles—to 'heal the sick' (10:9) and cast out demons is viewed as a primary biblical warrant against cessationism, demonstrating that charismatic empowerment for mission is normative for the broader body of believers. This establishes the classical Pentecostal missiology where evangelism and divine healing are deeply integrated; signs and wonders are expected to accompany the preached word. Furthermore, Pentecostal pneumatology places significant weight on verse 21, where Jesus rejoices 'in the Holy Spirit.' This is seen as a Trinitarian window into the dynamic, joyful operation of the Spirit, who actively reveals the Father's will to 'babes'—a verse early Pentecostals frequently invoked to defend their largely uneducated, grassroots movement against the theological criticisms of established, 'wise' ecclesiastical hierarchies.
Application — In practice, Pentecostals heavily apply the missional template of Luke 10: believers are encouraged to step out in faith, expecting God's present action through divine healing and spiritual gifts in everyday encounters. Pastors frequently preach on the authority given to believers 'over all the power of the enemy' (10:19) to encourage active prayer and spiritual warfare. However, this is characteristically balanced by verse 20, which is used to caution against spiritual pride or an unhealthy fixation on the demonic, reminding the church that the ultimate source of joy is eternal salvation. Additionally, the story of Mary and Martha (10:38-42) is continually applied to the spiritual life of the believer; Mary's choice to sit at Jesus' feet is championed as the biblical model for 'tarrying,' extended worship, and seeking the presence of God over mere religious busyness.
Autorités citées :Robert P. Menzies — Empowered for Witness: The Spirit in Luke-Acts · Stanley M. Horton — What the Bible Says About the Holy Spirit
audit au niveau des affirmations (4 vérifications)
- ✓ The commissioning of the seventy to heal the sick and preach proves that charism
- ✓ The believers' delegated authority over the power of the enemy is real and meant
- ✓ Jesus' joy in the Holy Spirit illustrates the Spirit's role in inspiring praise
- ✓ Mary's posture at Jesus' feet is applied as an exhortation to prioritize seeking
Seventh-day Adventistaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Seventh-day Adventist tradition: the seventh-day Sabbath, the great-controversy theme, conditional immortality, sanctuary theology, and a historicist reading of prophecy.
Sens immédiat — In Luke 10, Jesus expands His ministry by sending seventy disciples ahead of Him to preach the kingdom and heal. Upon their joyful return, Jesus frames their exorcisms as evidence of Satan's cosmic defeat. A lawyer tests Jesus on eternal life and the law; Jesus responds with the parable of the Good Samaritan to define neighborly love. The chapter concludes with Jesus visiting Martha and Mary, emphasizing the priority of hearing His word over anxious service.
Reception — Seventh-day Adventist theology reads this chapter prominently through the great-controversy theme and its high view of the moral law. Jesus' declaration, 'I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven' (Luke 10:18), is understood as a sweeping prophetic vision. Ellen G. White, in 'The Desire of Ages', treats this not merely as an observation of the disciples' immediate exorcisms, but as a summary of the entire cosmic conflict. It looks back to Lucifer's original expulsion from heaven, recognizes his decisive defeat at the impending cross, and anticipates his final eradication. Additionally, Jesus' exchange with the lawyer (Luke 10:25-28) is received as an affirmation of the perpetuity and spiritual depth of the moral law. The tradition emphasizes that Jesus points directly to the law's summary of love to God and neighbor as the standard of righteousness, demonstrating that the gospel does not abrogate obedience to the divine precepts.
Application — The parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:30-37) serves as a primary biblical mandate for the Seventh-day Adventist Church's extensive global healthcare network and medical missionary work. Writings such as Ellen G. White's 'The Ministry of Healing' insist that the Samaritan's physical care for the broken traveler is the model for practical, prejudice-breaking gospel labor, often terming medical missionary work the 'right arm' of the gospel message. Furthermore, the sending of the seventy (Luke 10:1-11) is applied structurally to lay evangelism, inspiring the tradition's practice of sending literature evangelists and Bible workers out 'two by two.' Finally, the story of Martha and Mary (Luke 10:38-42) provides a necessary pastoral caution within a highly active denomination, warning that rigorous institutional service and health ministry must never eclipse personal spiritual devotion at the feet of Christ.
Autorités citées :Ellen G. White — The Desire of Ages · Ellen G. White — Christ's Object Lessons · Ellen G. White — The Ministry of Healing
audit au niveau des affirmations (5 vérifications)
- ✓ Jesus' vision of Satan falling is a comprehensive view of the great controversy,
- ✓ Jesus' confirmation of the lawyer's answer affirms the perpetual validity of the
- ✓ The parable of the Good Samaritan is applied as the theological basis for compre
- ✓ The mission of the seventy validates the organizational method of sending lay ev
- ✓ The contrast between Martha and Mary serves as a warning against allowing heavy
Restorationist / Churches of Christaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Restoration Movement tradition (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches — formally non-creedal): restore New Testament Christianity, 'speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent,' reading by direct command, apostolic example, and necessary inference; baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; the weekly Lord's Supper.
Sens immédiat — In Luke 10, Jesus commissions seventy disciples for a preparatory, temporary mission, giving them specific instructions on provisions, travel, and preaching, as well as miraculous power. Upon their joyful return, Jesus rejoices over God's revelation to the humble. When a lawyer tests Jesus about inheriting eternal life, Jesus points him to the Law and delivers the Parable of the Good Samaritan to illustrate true neighborliness. The chapter concludes with Jesus visiting Martha and Mary, praising Mary for prioritizing his teaching over Martha's anxious service.
Reception — The Churches of Christ approach Luke 10 through a strong dispensational and cessationist hermeneutic, emphasizing the need to 'rightly divide the word of truth' by distinguishing who is being addressed in Scripture. Commentators like J.W. McGarvey and P.Y. Pendleton (*The Fourfold Gospel*) stress that the sending of the Seventy was a 'limited commission.' The commands to carry no purse or sandals (v. 4) and the miraculous authority to heal and cast out demons (vv. 9, 17-19) are understood strictly as localized, temporary provisions for that specific era to confirm the imminent arrival of the Kingdom. Because the tradition is inherently cessationist, these verses are never read as apostolic examples or commands for modern evangelists to expect miraculous preservation or to travel without support. Similarly, when the lawyer asks what he must do to inherit eternal life (v. 25), Jesus' instruction to keep the Law (vv. 26-28) is read contextually. H. Leo Boles (*A Commentary on the Gospel according to Luke*) notes that Jesus answered according to the prevailing Mosaic dispensation, as the New Covenant was not yet inaugurated by Christ's death. This is frequently contrasted with the post-resurrection commands (like Acts 2:38), illustrating that while the moral principles remain, the specific conditions for salvation shifted when the New Testament took effect. The Good Samaritan and the visit to Mary and Martha are received as timeless moral and spiritual exemplars. The Samaritan exemplifies that true religion transcends legalistic boundaries and requires active compassion, while Mary's posture at Jesus' feet demonstrates the supremacy of the Word.
Application — In application, the Parable of the Good Samaritan is a foundational text for Christian benevolence. 'Go, and do thou likewise' (v. 37) is treated as a direct command, motivating both individual charity and congregational relief efforts toward the destitute, regardless of their background. The failure of the priest and Levite serves as a warning against letting ceremonial or institutional priorities override practical mercy. The account of Mary and Martha is frequently preached to caution against allowing the busy, material anxieties of life—even well-intentioned service—to crowd out the 'one thing needful' (v. 42): the dedicated study and hearing of the Word of God.
Autorités citées :J.W. McGarvey and P.Y. Pendleton — The Fourfold Gospel · H. Leo Boles — A Commentary on the Gospel according to Luke
audit au niveau des affirmations (4 vérifications)
- ✓ The instructions to the seventy to take no provisions and their empowerment to p
- ✓ Jesus directed the lawyer to the requirements of the Law of Moses because the Go
- ✓ The Parable of the Good Samaritan is applied as a direct command for active, pra
- ✓ Mary's choice to sit at Jesus' feet is used to emphasize the supreme importance
Étape 3Panels non votants et annexe comparative
Ceux-ci informent les notes et le rendu, et sont rapportés ici, mais ils ne sont jamais comptabilisés dans le vote.
Academic textual-historical analysisaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Academic textual-historical analysis: philology and the original-language text, textual criticism, ancient Near Eastern (and, for the NT, Greco-Roman) context, literary genre and form, composition and dating debates, and reception history. Describe scholarly positions and their evidence without confessional commitment. This panel informs the textual notes and the rendering; it is never a church vote.
Sens immédiat — Academic textual-historical analysis views Luke 10 as a composite narrative drawing heavily on the Q source and unique Lukan (L) material. The chapter begins with the mission of the seventy or seventy-two (vv. 1-12), which parallels Matthew's mission discourse but is uniquely expanded by Luke to foreshadow the Gentile mission of Acts. This is followed by the 'Woe to unrepentant cities' (vv. 13-16) and the disciples' return (vv. 17-20). Verses 21-22 contain what scholars term the 'Johannine Thunderbolt,' a uniquely high piece of wisdom Christology found in the Synoptic tradition via Q. The latter half of the chapter features L material: the Parable of the Good Samaritan (vv. 25-37) and the visit to Martha and Mary (vv. 38-42). Form critics classify the Good Samaritan as an 'example story' rather than a true parable, noting its subversion of Judean-Samaritan ethnic boundaries, while the pairing of the Samaritan story, featuring a male protagonist, with Martha and Mary, featuring female protagonists, exemplifies Luke's redactional tendency to balance gendered narratives.
Reception — In the reception history of textual criticism, verses 1 and 17 present one of the most famous variants in the New Testament: whether Jesus sent 'seventy' or 'seventy-two' disciples. Textual critics note that the manuscript evidence is nearly evenly divided (Papyrus 75 and Vaticanus support 72, while Papyrus 45 and Sinaiticus support 70). Scholars suggest the variant stems from scribal attempts to align the number with either the seventy elders of Numbers 11 or the seventy-two nations of the earth listed in the Septuagint of Genesis 10. Regarding the history of interpretation, historical-critical scholarship marks a sharp break from the patristic and medieval allegorical readings of the Good Samaritan, which viewed the innkeeper as Paul or the Pope, and the two denarii as the sacraments. Nineteenth- and twentieth-century form critics firmly rejected these allegories, arguing that the historical Jesus delivered the story to make a single, socially provocative point about neighborliness exceeding purity laws and ethnic hatred.
Application — Critical scholars apply this chapter to reconstruct the social history of the Jesus movement and the theological priorities of the Lukan author. The Good Samaritan (vv. 29-37) is utilized to understand first-century Jewish purity codes, as the priest and Levite's avoidance of the half-dead man is historically contextualized as a fear of corpse impurity, making the Samaritan's intervention a profound critique of clerical legalism. Furthermore, the episode of Martha and Mary (vv. 38-42) is extensively applied in feminist biblical criticism. Scholars analyze Mary's position 'at the Lord's feet' (v. 39) as the recognized technical posture of a rabbinic disciple. Thus, Jesus' defense of Mary's choice over Martha's domestic service (v. 42) is reconstructed as evidence of an egalitarian impulse in the early Jesus movement that disrupted Greco-Roman patriarchal household codes, allowing women full participation in theological instruction.
Autorités citées :Bruce M. Metzger — A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament · John S. Kloppenborg — The Formation of Q · Adolf Jülicher — Die Gleichnisreden Jesu · Joachim Jeremias — The Parables of Jesus · Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza — In Memory of Her
audit au niveau des affirmations (5 vérifications)
- ✓ The number of missionaries sent is a major textual variant between 'seventy' and
- ✓ Jesus' prayer thanking the Father and asserting exclusive mutual knowledge betwe
- ✓ Historical-critical scholarship rejects allegorical interpretations of the Good
- ✓ The priest and Levite passing by the injured man reflects historical first-centu
- ✓ Mary's position at the feet of Jesus indicates the formal posture of a disciple,
Jewish interpretationaudit ✓
Prisme donné au modèle :Jewish interpretation of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible books only; do not treat the New Testament as Scripture, and address it only historically if at all). Distinguish rabbinic (Talmud, Midrash), medieval (Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and the classical mefarshim), and modern (including critical and denominational) voices rather than presenting one uniform Jewish position. This panel informs, and is reported, but never a Christian church vote.
Sens immédiat — Read purely as a first-century historical text rather than as Jewish Scripture, this chapter depicts a Jewish teacher expanding his movement and engaging in halakhic and ethical debate. The commissioning of seventy disciples (vv. 1-17) mirrors the seventy elders appointed by Moses (Numbers 11). The encounter with the Torah scholar ('lawyer') reflects characteristic Jewish pedagogy of the period, where teachers sought to distill the essence of the Torah. The scholar correctly summarizes the Law by uniting the command to love God (Deuteronomy 6:5) with the command to love one's neighbor (Leviticus 19:18). In the subsequent parable, the actions of the Priest and Levite (vv. 31-32) are historically grounded in Jewish purity laws (tum'at met, Leviticus 21:1), which forbade priests from coming into contact with a corpse; seeing a 'half dead' man (v. 30), they may have avoided him to prevent ritual defilement.
Reception — Because the New Testament is not part of the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh), Luke has no canonical status, liturgical role, or halakhic authority in Judaism. Historically, Jewish interaction with the Gospels was largely limited to medieval polemics. In the modern era, however, Jewish critical scholars have extensively analyzed this chapter to recover the first-century Jewish context and to critique anti-Jewish Christian interpretations. Regarding the Good Samaritan, Amy-Jill Levine argues that a contemporary Jewish audience hearing a story about a Priest and a Levite would naturally expect the third figure to be an 'Israelite,' reflecting the standard tripartite division of the Jewish people. The introduction of a Samaritan—a group with whom Jews had intense mutual hostility—was a deliberate provocation meant to challenge tribal boundaries, not an indictment of Jewish law as heartless. Claude Montefiore similarly highlights that the lawyer's synthesis of love for God and neighbor demonstrates that Jesus' ethical teachings were firmly rooted in the normative Judaism of his day.
Application — This chapter is not applied in Jewish religious practice or prayer. Its modern application is entirely academic and dialogical. Jewish scholars use the text in interfaith dialogue to demonstrate the Jewishness of Jesus' teachings, to explain the historical mechanics of Jewish purity laws, and to correct supersessionist readings that contrast a supposedly legalistic Judaism with a religion of love.
Autorités citées :Amy-Jill Levine — Short Stories by Jesus · Claude Montefiore — The Synoptic Gospels
audit au niveau des affirmations (4 vérifications)
- ✓ The commissioning of the seventy disciples historically parallels the seventy el
- ✓ The pairing of Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18 is a historically authentic r
- ✓ The Priest and Levite's actions are historically understood as an adherence to b
- ✓ The literary progression of Priest and Levite set a cultural expectation for an
Annexe comparative — en dehors de la liste nicéenne-trinitaire (Latter-day Saint, Jehovah's Witnesses)
Latter-day Saint
Prisme donné au modèle :Latter-day Saint reading (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints): the Bible read alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, with living prophets and continuing revelation, and the Joseph Smith Translation where relevant. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Sens immédiat — In its immediate gospel context, Luke 10 narrates Jesus expanding His ministry by sending seventy disciples in pairs to prepare the way for Him. He gives them instructions on relying on local hospitality, pronouncing peace, and warning those who reject the message. Upon their joyful return, Jesus celebrates the Father's revelation to the humble. The chapter concludes with two profound teachings on discipleship: the parable of the Good Samaritan, prompted by a lawyer's question about eternal life and neighborly love, and the domestic scene of Mary and Martha, which contrasts temporal busyness with spiritual attentiveness.
Reception — Latter-day Saint reception of Luke 10 focuses heavily on priesthood organization and the allegorical depth of its parables. The appointment of the 'other seventy' (verse 1) is not read merely as a temporary historical event, but as the biblical precedent for a permanent priesthood office. Through modern revelation (Doctrine and Covenants 107), the Quorum of the Seventy is established as a traveling ministry and 'special witnesses' called to preach the gospel and assist the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles globally. The Parable of the Good Samaritan (verses 25-37) is highly valued as an allegory of the Plan of Salvation, a reading popularized in modern Latter-day Saint thought by scholar John W. Welch. In this allegorical framework, the traveler going 'down' from Jerusalem to Jericho represents humanity's Fall from God's presence into the mortal world. The thieves represent sin and Satan; the priest and Levite signify the inability of the Law of Moses to save. The Good Samaritan represents Jesus Christ, who alone has compassion, binds the wounds of fallen humanity with the oil and wine of His Atonement, and brings the wounded soul to the inn (His Church) for continued care and healing.
Application — The chapter is applied vigorously to modern missionary work and personal discipleship. The mandate for the Seventy to travel 'two and two' (verse 1) remains the standard operational model for tens of thousands of Latter-day Saint missionaries worldwide, teaching them to minister in companionship and rely on the Lord. The interaction between Jesus, Mary, and Martha (verses 38-42) is frequently applied to the modern challenge of prioritization. As taught by Dallin H. Oaks, Martha's desire to serve was 'good,' but Mary's choice to sit at the Savior's feet was 'better' or 'best.' Latter-day Saints apply this to avoid being so 'cumbered about much serving' in their daily lives or even in Church callings that they neglect direct spiritual nourishment, scripture study, and communion with the Lord.
Autorités citées :Joseph Smith — Doctrine and Covenants · John W. Welch — The Good Samaritan (Ensign) · Dallin H. Oaks — Good, Better, Best
Jehovah's Witnesses
Prisme donné au modèle :Jehovah's Witness reading (Watch Tower Society): attention to the divine name, God's Kingdom as a real government, conditional immortality, and a non-Trinitarian Christology. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Sens immédiat — In Luke 10, Jesus expands his ministry by appointing seventy disciples, sending them in pairs ahead of him to preach that the Kingdom of God has drawn near. He gives them specific instructions for their journey, including reliance on the hospitality of receptive households, and pronounces severe judgments upon unresponsive cities, declaring that Capernaum will be brought down to Hades. Upon their joyful return, Jesus remarks that he sees Satan falling like lightning from heaven, and he rejoices in holy spirit, thanking his Father for revealing truths to childlike ones rather than the worldly wise. Jesus then answers a lawyer's test regarding eternal life with the parable of the neighborly Samaritan, and concludes the chapter in the home of Martha and Mary, where he gently corrects Martha for letting the anxieties of hospitality distract her from the spiritual instruction Mary has chosen.
Reception — The tradition reads Luke 10 as foundational for its organized evangelistic ministry and its non-Trinitarian theology. The instruction in verse 7, 'Do not go from house to house,' is interpreted not as a prohibition against door-to-door preaching, but as a specific command regarding hospitality: the traveling evangelists were not to offend their original hosts by leaving for a home that offered better food or lodging. The message the disciples carried, 'God's Kingdom has come near' (verse 9), is understood to mean that the future King of God's literal government, Jesus, was present among them. Christological and theological boundaries are firmly drawn from verses 21 and 22. Jesus' rejoicing 'in the holy spirit' is read with the holy spirit understood as God's active force, not a co-equal person. In his prayer, Jesus addresses the Father as 'Lord of heaven and earth,' maintaining the strict distinction between Jehovah as Almighty God and Jesus as his subordinate Son, who serves as the sole channel of revelation. Two other distinct doctrines appear in this chapter. First, Capernaum being 'brought down to Hades' (verse 15) is read through the lens of conditional immortality; Hades represents the common grave of mankind or a state of non-existence, entirely devoid of fiery torment. Second, Jesus' statement, 'I saw Satan having fallen like lightning from heaven' (verse 18), is understood as a prophetic vision of Satan's future expulsion from heaven, an event the tradition links to the establishment of the Kingdom.
Application — In application, Luke 10 serves as a primary template for the modern preaching work. The statement that 'the harvest indeed is plentiful, but the laborers are few' (verse 2) is continually used to encourage zealous participation in the ministry. The parable of the Good Samaritan (verses 30-37) is applied practically to emphasize impartial love and compassion, urging adherents to demonstrate neighborly love regardless of race, nationality, or religion, both in their evangelism and in disaster relief efforts. Finally, the account of Mary and Martha (verses 38-42) is frequently cited in pastoral counsel to warn against materialism and the distractions of daily life, encouraging adherents to 'choose the good part' by prioritizing Bible study, congregation meetings, and spiritual routines.
Autorités citées :Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Jesus—The Way, the Truth, the Life · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — The Watchtower
Étape 4Établir la base en langue originale
Le rendu est construit à partir du texte source, et non à partir de la majorité anglaise.
Base textuelle — Public-domain Greek text matching the provided original-language text for Luke 10.
Noms divins — Kyrios (Lord), Theos (God)
- v1: The Greek text reads 'ἑβδομήκοντα δύο' (seventy-two), which is a known variant compared to the Majority Text 'seventy' (as reflected in the KJV, ASV, and WEB).
- v17: Similarly, the text reads 'ἑβδομήκοντα δύο' (seventy-two), compared to texts reading 'seventy'.
- v22: The phrase 'καὶ στραφεὶς πρὸς τοὺς μαθητὰς εἶπεν' (And turning to the disciples he said) appears at the start of verse 22 in this text, whereas it is omitted in some manuscript traditions.
- v39: The text reads 'τοῦ κυρίου' (of the Lord) rather than 'Ἰησοῦ' (of Jesus).
- v41: The text reads 'ὁ κύριος' (the Lord) rather than 'Ἰησοῦς' (Jesus).
- v42: The text reads 'ὀλίγων ἢ ἑνὸς δέ ἐστιν χρεία' (few things are needed, or one) as opposed to the shorter variant 'ἑνὸς δέ ἐστιν χρεία' (one thing is needful).
- v1: (d) Number shift / Repetition: 'ἀνὰ δύο δύο' (two by two); (g) Divine name: 'ὁ κύριος' (the Lord).
- v2: (f) Repetition: 'θερισμὸς ... θερισμοῦ ... θερισμὸν' (harvest) and 'ἐργάται ... ἐργάτας' (laborers); (g) Divine name: 'τοῦ κυρίου τοῦ θερισμοῦ' (the Lord of the harvest).
- v3: (h) Interjection: 'ἰδοὺ' (behold).
- v4: (f) Repetition: 'μὴ ... μὴ ... μὴ' (not/nor); (b) Alliteration: 'βαστάζετε βαλλάντιον' (carry purse).
- v5: (a) Cognate: 'οἰκίαν ... οἴκῳ' (house ... house).
- v6: (b) Wordplay/Idiom: 'υἱὸς εἰρήνης' (son of peace); (f) Repetition: 'εἰρήνης ... εἰρήνη'; (d) Number shift: singular 'ἐπ᾽ αὐτὸν' (upon him) compared to plural 'ὑμῶν/ὑμᾶς' (your/you).
- v7: (f) Repetition: 'οἰκίᾳ ... οἰκίας ... οἰκίαν' (house).
- v8: (f) Refrain structure starting: 'εἰς ἣν δ᾽ ἂν πόλιν εἰσέρχησθε' (into whatever city you enter).
- v9: (g) Divine name: 'τοῦ θεοῦ' (of God); (f) Refrain phrase: 'ἤγγικεν ἐφ᾽ ὑμᾶς ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ' (the kingdom of God has come near upon you).
- v10: (f) Refrain structure continued: 'εἰς ἣν δ᾽ ἂν πόλιν εἰσέλθητε' (into whatever city you enter).
- v11: (b) Alliteration: 'κονιορτὸν τὸν κολληθέντα' (k-k-k); (f) Refrain phrase: 'ἤγγικεν ἐφ᾽ ὑμᾶς ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ' (the kingdom of God has come near upon you); (g) Divine name: 'τοῦ θεοῦ' (of God).
- v12: (c) Demonstrative pattern: 'ἐν τῇ ἡμέρᾳ ἐκείνῃ ... τῇ πόλει ἐκείνῃ' (in that day ... that city).
- v13: (f) Repetition: 'Οὐαί σοι ... οὐαί σοι' (Woe to you); (a) Cognate: 'αἱ δυνάμεις αἱ γενόμεναι' (the powers/miracles generated/done).
- v14: (f) Repetition/Refrain linking to v.12: 'ἀνεκτότερον ἔσται' (it will be more tolerable).
- v15: (e) Chiasm/Contrast: 'ἕως τοῦ οὐρανοῦ ὑψωθήσῃ ... ἕως τοῦ ᾅδου καταβήσῃ' (exalted to heaven ... brought down to Hades).
- v16: (e) Chiasm/Repetition: 'ὁ ἀκούων ... ἀκούει ... ἀθετῶν ... ἀθετεῖ ... ἀθετῶν ἀθετεῖ' (hearing hears, rejecting rejects).
- v17: (g) Divine name: 'κύριε' (Lord).
- v18: (b) Imagery/Wordplay: 'ὡς ἀστραπὴν ἐκ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ πεσόντα' (like lightning falling from heaven).
- v19: (h) Interjection: 'ἰδοὺ' (behold); (f) Repetition: 'ἐπάνω ... ἐπὶ' (upon/over); (b) Assonance/Double negative constraint: 'οὐδὲν ὑμᾶς οὐ μὴ ἀδικήσῃ'.
- v20: (f) Repetition: 'μὴ χαίρετε ... χαίρετε δὲ' (do not rejoice ... but rejoice); Repetition from v.17: 'ὑποτάσσεται' (subjected).
- v21: (g) Divine names/titles: 'πάτερ' (Father), 'κύριε' (Lord), 'ὁ πατήρ' (the Father); (a) Cognate: 'ἠγαλλιάσατο' (rejoiced).
- v22: (e) Chiasm: 'ὁ υἱὸς εἰ μὴ ὁ πατήρ ... ὁ πατὴρ εἰ μὴ ὁ υἱὸς' (the Son except the Father ... the Father except the Son); (g) Divine names: 'πατρός', 'πατήρ', 'υἱὸς'.
- v23: (a) Cognate: 'οἱ βλέποντες ἃ βλέπετε' (those seeing what you see).
- v24: (a) Cognate/Repetition: 'ἰδεῖν ... εἶδαν' (to see ... saw), 'ἀκοῦσαι ... ἤκουσαν' (to hear ... heard).
- v25: (h) Interjection: 'ἰδοὺ' (behold); (a) Cognate: 'ἐκπειράζων' (tempting/testing).
- v26: (c) Demonstrative interrogatives: 'τί γέγραπται; πῶς ἀναγινώσκεις;' (what is written? how do you read?).
- v27: (g) Divine names: 'κύριον τὸν θεόν' (Lord the God); (f) Repetition: 'ἐξ ὅλης τῆς ... καὶ ἐν ὅλῃ τῇ ...' (with all the... repeated 4 times).
- v28: (c) Demonstrative: 'τοῦτο ποίει' (this do).
- v29: (e) Inclusio beginning: 'τίς ἐστίν μου πλησίον;' (who is my neighbor?).
- v30: (b) Assonance: Plural participles ending in -ντες ('ἐκδύσαντες ... ἐπιθέντες ... ἀφέντες').
- v31: (f) Repetition pattern starting: 'ἰδὼν αὐτὸν ἀντιπαρῆλθεν' (seeing him passed by opposite).
- v32: (f) Repetition pattern matching v.31: 'ἰδὼν ἀντιπαρῆλθεν' (seeing passed by opposite).
- v33: (f) Contrast pattern: 'ἰδὼν αὐτὸν ἐσπλαγχνίσθη' (seeing him was moved with compassion) comparing against v.31-32.
- v34: (b) Alliteration/Prefixes: 'ἐπιχέων ... ἐπιβιβάσας ... ἐπεμελήθη' (epi- prefixes).
- v35: (a) Cognate link to v.34: 'ἐπιμελήθητι' (take care).
- v36: (e) Inclusio completion (with v.29): 'τίς ... πλησίον δοκεῖ σοι γεγονέναι' (who seems to have become a neighbor).
- v37: (a) Cognate: 'ὁ ποιήσας ... ποίει' (the one having done ... do).
- v38: (c) Demonstrative pattern: 'εἰς κώμην τινά' (into a certain village), 'γυνὴ δέ τις' (and a certain woman).
- v39: (g) Divine name: 'τοῦ κυρίου' (the Lord).
- v40: (a) Cognate: 'διακονίαν ... διακονεῖν' (serving ... to serve); (g) Divine name: 'κύριε' (Lord).
- v41: (g) Divine name: 'ὁ κύριος' (the Lord); (f) Repetition: 'Μάρθα Μάρθα' (Martha, Martha).
- v42: (d) Number shift/contrast: 'ὀλίγων ἢ ἑνός' (few things or one).
Étape 5Comparer les traductions, verset par verset
Chaque différence classifiée : textuelle · lexicale · grammaticale · interprétative · stylistique (cette dernière uniquement lorsqu’elle modifie le sens).
- textualv1 whether the number appointed was seventy or seventy-two — “appointed other seventy also” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “others” (ASV, DARBY) vs “also others” (WEB) vs “did appoint also” (YLT) vs “other seventy-two” (DRC)
- stylisticv1 use of 'whither' versus 'where' — “whither” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “where” (WEB, DARBY)
- lexicalv1 translating the verb for impending action as 'was about to', 'would', or 'was to' — “was about to” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “himself would” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “was to” (DRC)
- lexicalv2 translating the conjunction as 'and', 'then', or 'therefore' — “And” (ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “Then” (WEB, YLT) vs “Therefore said” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- stylisticv2 use of 'said to' versus 'said unto' — “said to” (WEB, DARBY, DRC) vs “unto” (KJV, YLT) vs “said” (ASV) vs “to” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv2 describing the harvest as 'great', 'plentiful', or 'abundant' — “great” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “indeed plentiful” (WEB) vs “plenteous” (ASV) vs “abundant” (YLT)
- lexicalv2 translating 'laborers' versus 'workmen' — “laborers” (WEB, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “labourers are” (KJV, DRC) vs “workmen” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv2 translating the verb for request as 'pray', 'beseech', or 'supplicate' — “pray ye therefore” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “to” (WEB) vs “beseech then” (YLT) vs “supplicate” (DARBY)
- lexicalv3 translating 'among' versus 'in the midst of' — “among” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “in the midst of” (ASV, YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv4 translating 'no one' versus 'no man' — “one on” (WEB, YLT, DARBY) vs “man by” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “on” (ASV)
- stylisticv5 (vv 5, 10) use of 'whatsoever' versus 'whatever' — “whatsoever” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “whatever” (WEB, YLT, WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv5 choice of second-person pronoun forms and auxiliary verbs — “ye” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB, DRC) vs “shall” (ASV) vs “do” (YLT)
- grammaticalv7 syntactic placement of 'remain' and inclusion of conjunction — “And” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Remain” (WEB)
- grammaticalv7 use of 'the same' versus 'that' modifying the house — “the same” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “that” (WEB, ASV, YLT)
- grammaticalv7 use of 'such' versus the definite article — “such” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the” (WEB, YLT)
- lexicalv7 translating 'give' versus 'have' — “give” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “have” (YLT, DARBY, DRC)
- lexicalv7 translating 'hire' versus 'wages' and 'go not' versus 'remove' — “hire Go not” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “Remove” (DARBY, DRC) vs “wages Don’t” (WEB)
- stylisticv8 use of 'whatever' versus 'whatsoever' — “whatever” (WEB, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “whatsoever” (KJV, ASV, DARBY) vs “what” (DRC)
- grammaticalv8 pronoun choice and auxiliary verb forms — “ye” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB) vs “may” (DARBY) vs “soever you” (DRC)
- grammaticalv8 phrasing of 'such things as are set before you' — “such things as are” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the that” (WEB) vs “the” (YLT) vs “what is” (DARBY)
- lexicalv9 translating 'sick' versus 'ailing' — “sick that are therein” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “who there” (WEB) vs “ailing in it” (YLT) vs “in it” (DARBY)
- stylisticv9 (vv 9, 12) use of 'say to' versus 'tell' — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “say unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “tell” (WEB)
- lexicalv9 translating the proximity as 'nigh unto' or 'near to' — “nigh unto” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “near to” (WEB)
- grammaticalv10 pronoun choice and verb tense handling — “you” (WEB, DRC) vs “ye enter” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “shall” (ASV) vs “do” (YLT) vs “may have entered” (DARBY)
- stylisticv12 (vv 12, 14, 42) use of 'shall' versus 'will' — “shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “will” (WEB)
- stylisticv13 phrasing of the direct address 'unto thee' versus 'to you' — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “unto thee Chorazin” (KJV, ASV) vs “to you” (WEB) vs “to Corozain” (DRC)
- stylisticv13 use of 'unto thee' versus 'to you' — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto thee” (KJV, ASV) vs “to you” (WEB)
- lexicalv15 translating 'brought down' versus 'thrust down' — “brought” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “thrust” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
- lexicalv16 translating 'heareth' versus 'listens to' — “He that heareth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Whoever listens to” (WEB) vs “who is hearing” (YLT) vs “hears” (DARBY)
- lexicalv16 translating 'despiseth', 'rejects', or 'puts away' — “he that despiseth” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “whoever rejects” (WEB) vs “rejecteth” (ASV) vs “who is putting” (YLT) vs “rejects” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv16 (vv 16, 36) choice of relative pronoun 'that' versus 'who' — “that” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “who” (WEB, YLT)
- lexicalv17 translating 'demons' versus 'devils' — “demons” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “devils” (KJV) vs “also” (DRC)
- grammaticalv17 (vv 17, 20) phrasing of 'subject unto' versus 'subjected to' — “to” (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “subject unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “being subjected to” (YLT)
- lexicalv17 translating the preposition as 'through' versus 'in' — “through thy” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “in” (ASV, YLT, DRC) vs “in your” (WEB)
- stylisticv18 (vv 18, 26, 28) use of 'to' versus 'unto' — “to” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto” (KJV, ASV)
- lexicalv19 translating 'power' versus 'authority' — “power to tread on” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “authority” (WEB) vs “authority upon” (ASV) vs “the authority upon” (YLT) vs “the of treading upon” (DARBY) vs “upon” (DRC)
- lexicalv19 translating the preposition as 'over', 'on', or 'upon' — “over” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “on” (YLT) vs “upon” (DRC)
- grammaticalv20 translating the conjunction as 'that' versus 'because' — “that” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “because” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “rather that” (YLT) vs “in this that” (DRC)
- grammaticalv20 translating 'heaven' as singular or plural — “heaven” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the heavens” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv21 translating 'same' versus 'that' hour — “same” (WEB, ASV, DRC) vs “that” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “the same” (DARBY)
- textualv21 explicit inclusion of the subject 'Jesus' versus the pronoun 'he' — “Jesus rejoiced” (WEB, KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “he” (ASV, DRC) vs “was glad” (YLT)
- textualv21 inclusion of the modifier 'Holy' before 'Spirit' — “spirit” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “the Holy” (WEB, ASV) vs “the” (YLT) vs “the Holy Ghost” (DRC)
- lexicalv21 translating the verb of thanksgiving as 'thank', 'praise', or 'confess' — “thank thee O” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB) vs “do confess to” (YLT) vs “praise” (DARBY) vs “confess to” (DRC)
- grammaticalv21 verb tense for 'have hidden' versus 'didst hide' — “that thou hast hid” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “didst hide” (ASV, YLT) vs “you have hidden” (WEB) vs “because hidden” (DRC)
- lexicalv21 translating 'prudent' versus 'understanding' — “prudent” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “understanding” (WEB, ASV, YLT)
- lexicalv21 translating 'babes' versus 'little children' and 'even so' versus 'yes' — “to little children Yes” (WEB) vs “unto babes even so” (KJV) vs “yea” (ASV) vs “to yes” (YLT) vs “to yea” (DARBY) vs “to” (WEBSTER) vs “to little ones Yea” (DRC)
- lexicalv21 translating the causal connector as 'for so', 'because', or 'thus' — “for so” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “because” (YLT) vs “thus has” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv22 verb tense 'are' versus 'have been' — “have been” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “are” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “were” (YLT)
- lexicalv22 translating 'delivered to' versus 'delivered up' — “to” (WEB, KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto” (ASV) vs “up” (YLT)
- grammaticalv22 preposition 'by' versus 'of' denoting agency — “by” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “of” (KJV, ASV)
- lexicalv22 translating 'no man' versus 'no one' — “one knows” (WEB, DARBY) vs “man knoweth” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “one” (ASV, DRC) vs “one doth know” (YLT)
- lexicalv22 translating 'but' versus 'except' or 'save' — “but” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “except” (WEB, YLT) vs “save” (ASV)
- grammaticalv22 choice of relative pronoun form 'whom' versus 'whomsoever' — “whom” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “whomsoever” (ASV, DARBY) vs “whomever” (WEB)
- lexicalv22 translating 'will', 'desires', 'wishes', or 'is pleased' — “will” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “desires to” (WEB) vs “willeth to” (ASV) vs “may wish to” (YLT) vs “is pleased to” (DARBY)
- stylisticv24 use of 'tell' versus 'say to' — “tell” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER) vs “say to” (YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “say unto” (ASV)
- grammaticalv24 verb tense and phrasing for 'have not seen' — “have not seen them” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “did see” (YLT, DARBY) vs “didn’t see” (WEB) vs “saw not” (ASV)
- grammaticalv24 phrasing of the object 'the things which' — “the” (ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “the you” (WEB) vs “those things which ye” (KJV) vs “what” (YLT) vs “the that you” (DRC)
- grammaticalv24 verb tense and phrasing for 'have not heard' — “have not heard them” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “did hear” (YLT, DARBY) vs “didn’t hear” (WEB) vs “not” (ASV)
- lexicalv25 translating 'tempted', 'testing', or 'trying' — “and tempted” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “tempting” (DARBY, DRC) vs “tested” (WEB) vs “made trial of” (ASV) vs “trying” (YLT)
- lexicalv25 translating 'Teacher' versus 'Master' — “Teacher” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “Master” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Teacher having done” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv25 use of 'shall' versus 'must' for future obligation — “shall” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “having done life age-during” (YLT) vs “must” (DRC)
- grammaticalv26 phrasing of the interrogative 'how readest thou' — “readest thou” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “do you read it” (WEB) vs “dost read” (YLT)
- stylisticv27 phrasing of 'answering said' versus 'answered' — “answering said Thou shalt” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “answered You shall” (WEB)
- stylisticv27 use of 'thy' versus 'your' — “thy” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “your” (WEB)
- lexicalv27 translating 'with all thy' versus 'with thy whole' or 'out of' — “with all thy” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “your” (WEB) vs “out of” (YLT) vs “whole” (DRC)
- lexicalv27 translating 'mind' versus 'understanding' — “thy mind” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “your” (WEB) vs “understanding” (YLT) vs “thine understanding” (DARBY)
- stylisticv27 use of 'thy neighbour' versus 'your neighbor' — “thy neighbour” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “neighbor” (ASV, WEBSTER) vs “your neighbor” (WEB)
- stylisticv27 use of 'thyself' versus 'yourself' — “thyself” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “yourself” (WEB)
- stylisticv28 use of 'thou shalt' versus 'you will' — “thou shalt” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you will” (WEB)
- lexicalv29 translating 'willing to justify' versus 'desiring to justify' or 'declare righteous' — “willing to justify” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “desiring” (WEB, ASV) vs “declare” (YLT) vs “desirous of justifying” (DARBY)
- lexicalv29 translating the communicative verb as 'said' or 'asked' — “to” (DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “said unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “asked” (WEB) vs “righteous” (YLT)
- lexicalv30 translating 'went down', 'was going', or 'descended' — “was going” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “went down” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “descended” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv30 syntactic rendering of 'half dead' versus 'in a half-dead state' — “half dead” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “in a half-dead state” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv31 phrasing describing the priest's travel 'was going down' versus 'came down' — “was going down” (WEB, ASV) vs “that” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “was going down in” (YLT) vs “happened to go down” (DARBY) vs “went down the same” (DRC)
- lexicalv32 translating 'likewise' versus 'in like manner' or 'in the same way' — “in like manner also” (YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “And likewise” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “In the same way” (WEB) vs “in like manner” (ASV)
- grammaticalv32 phrasing of the Levite's arrival 'came to' versus 'when he was at' — “also came to” (WEB, ASV) vs “when he was at” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “having been about” (YLT) vs “being” (DARBY) vs “near” (DRC)
- lexicalv33 translating 'journeyed' versus 'traveled' — “as he journeyed” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “journeying” (YLT, DARBY) vs “traveled” (WEB) vs “being on his journey” (DRC)
- lexicalv33 translating 'moved with compassion' versus 'had compassion' — “was moved with” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “he had” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- lexicalv34 translating the preposition as 'in' versus 'on' — “in” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “on” (WEB, YLT) vs “on them” (ASV)
- grammaticalv34 syntactic connection 'and set him' versus 'having lifted him' — “He” (WEB, ASV) vs “and set” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “having lifted” (YLT) vs “having put” (DARBY) vs “setting” (DRC)
- lexicalv34 translating the preposition 'on' versus 'up' or 'upon' — “on” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “up” (YLT) vs “upon” (DRC)
- lexicalv35 translating the currency as 'pence', 'denarii', or 'shillings' — “pence and” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “denarii” (WEB) vs “shillings” (ASV) vs “denaries he” (YLT) vs “denarii he” (DARBY)
- lexicalv35 translating 'host' versus 'innkeeper' — “host” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “innkeeper” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv36 translating the preposition 'among' versus 'into' — “among” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “into” (DARBY)
- lexicalv36 translating 'robbers' versus 'thieves' — “robbers” (WEB, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “thieves” (KJV) vs “hands of the robbers” (DARBY)
- stylisticv37 use of 'said to' versus 'unto' — “said to” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “unto” (KJV) vs “said” (ASV) vs “to” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv38 translating 'village' versus 'town' — “village” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “town” (DRC)
- grammaticalv38 phrasing of the past tense 'received' versus 'did receive' — “received” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “did receive” (YLT) vs “by name” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv39 choice of relative pronoun 'who' versus 'which' — “who” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “which” (KJV) vs “who sitting” (DRC)
- lexicalv40 translating the conjunction as 'but', 'and', or 'now' — “But” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “and” (YLT) vs “Now” (DARBY)
- lexicalv40 translating 'cumbered about', 'distracted with', or 'busy' — “cumbered about” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “distracted with” (WEB, DARBY) vs “distracted” (YLT) vs “busy” (DRC)
- stylisticv40 phrasing of the address and interrogative 'Lord, dost thou not' — “Lord dost thou not” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “don’t you” (WEB) vs “Sir” (YLT) vs “hast no” (DRC)
- lexicalv40 translating 'bid', 'speak', 'ask', or 'say' — “alone bid” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “Speak to” (DARBY, DRC) vs “Ask” (WEB) vs “say then to” (YLT)
- grammaticalv40 syntactic phrasing of the request 'that she help me' — “therefore that she help” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “to” (WEB) vs “may partake along with” (YLT) vs “may” (DARBY)
- lexicalv41 translating 'careful' versus 'anxious' — “thou art careful” (KJV, DARBY, DRC) vs “anxious” (ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “you are anxious” (WEB)
- lexicalv41 translating 'troubled' versus 'disquieted' — “troubled” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “disquieted” (YLT) vs “art” (DRC)
- grammaticalv42 syntactic phrasing of 'one thing' — “one thing” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “of there” (YLT) vs “there” (DARBY)
- lexicalv42 translating 'needful', 'needed', or 'necessary' — “needful and” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “needed” (WEB) vs “for” (ASV) vs “need” (YLT) vs “need of one” (DARBY) vs “necessary” (DRC)
- lexicalv42 translating 'good' versus 'best' — “has the” (WEB, DARBY) vs “hath chosen that good” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “the” (ASV, YLT) vs “the best” (DRC)
Étape 6Synthèse — affirmations atomiques, par famille, pas par nombre de sièges
Chaque déclaration est divisée en plus petites affirmations testables ; chaque profil éligible répond AFFIRME / REJETTE / NUANCE / SILENCIEUX sur chacune.
Le consensus
Several traditions emphasize that believers must root their highest joy in heavenly citizenship rather than spiritual power. However, interpretation of the chapter's major narratives is heavily disputed, particularly the Parable of the Good Samaritan: traditions are divided over whether it serves as a literal mandate for universal neighbor-love and structural social justice, or primarily functions as an allegory of salvation where the characters and elements represent Christ, fallen humanity, the powerless Old Testament Law, and the Church's sacramental mysteries. The commissioning of the seventy is likewise disputed, with disagreement over whether it provides a permanent blueprint for lay evangelism and ongoing charismatic spiritual warfare, or was a limited historical dispensation. Finally, the story of Martha and Mary prompts further debate regarding whether it establishes the superiority of the contemplative life and mandates extended inward devotion over religious busyness, while some traditions uniquely draw on the chapter's other teachings to assert unconditional election, a pedagogical use of the Law to crush self-justification, or the objective authority of the ordained office.
Spécifique à la famille — caractéristique d’une seule famille
The seventy disciples constitute a foundational apostolic body commemorated liturgically by the Church.
2 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 10 silencieuxAncienne SUPPORTRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (2)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The Eastern Catholic churches preserve a robust liturgical veneration of this group, celebrating the "Synaxis of the Seventy Apostles" (found in the Byzantine Synaxarion), whereas the Latin tradition often focuses on how this expanded mission supports the hierarchical structure.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The sending of the Seventy (vv. 1-17) is viewed as foundational for apostolic succession and the expansive mission of the Church, formally commemorated in the liturgical calendar as the Synaxis of the Seventy Apostles.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The declaration 'He who hears you hears me' establishes the objective authority of the ordained office, ensuring that Christ Himself speaks through the Magisterium or the minister's absolution.
2 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 10 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (2)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The Second Vatican Council invokes this verse in Lumen Gentium to affirm that the bishops, as successors of the apostles, speak with the authority of Christ himself.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Jesus' assertion in verse 16, 'He who hears you hears me,' is foundational for the Lutheran understanding of the Office of the Holy Ministry; Melanchthon in the Apology of the Augsburg Confession uses this to argue that pastors do not represent their own persons but act in the stead and by the command of Christ, guaranteeing the objective efficacy of the preached Word and Absolution.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Christ's thanksgiving that God hides truth from the wise and reveals it to babes proves that eternal salvation rests entirely on God's sovereign, unconditional election.
2 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 10 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (2)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“John Calvin and the Canons of Dort lean heavily on Christ's thanksgiving to demonstrate that the revelation of the gospel to some ('babes') and the withholding of it from others ('the wise') rests entirely on the 'good pleasure' of God's will, independent of human merit or foreseen faith.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“John Gill interpreted the names 'written in heaven' as a clear reference to eternal, unconditional election, and read Jesus' prayer thanking the Father for hiding truth from the wise as a demonstration of God's sovereign grace in personal conversion, independent of human merit.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
Jesus' response to the lawyer ('Do this, and you will live') is a pedagogical use of the Law meant to crush the desire for self-justification and expose humanity's inability to save itself.
3 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 9 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme SUPPORTÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (3)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Because the lawyer desires to justify himself, Jesus applies the Law strictly ('Do this, and you will live') not to show a path to salvation, but as a mirror to crush his self-righteousness and reveal his inability to perfectly love God and neighbor.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Jesus is not offering a realistic path to justification for fallen humanity, but rather wielding the perfect standard of the Law to crush the lawyer's self-righteousness ('willing to justify himself') and expose his total inability to save himself.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Jesus uses the absolute demand of the law to crush the lawyer's self-justification, pointing to the necessity of grace”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
Jesus' confirmation of the lawyer's answer affirms the perpetual validity of the moral law as the standard of righteousness.
2 affirment · 0 rejettent · 1 nuancent · 9 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (3)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Jesus is not offering a realistic path to justification for fallen humanity, but rather wielding the perfect standard of the Law to crush the lawyer's self-righteousness ('willing to justify himself') and expose his total inability to save himself.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Additionally, Jesus' exchange with the lawyer (Luke 10:25-28) is received as an affirmation of the perpetuity and spiritual depth of the moral law.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
“This is frequently contrasted with the post-resurrection commands (like Acts 2:38), illustrating that while the moral principles remain, the specific conditions for salvation shifted when the New Testament took effect.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
Spécifique à la tradition — une seule tradition
The instructions to go as 'lambs among wolves' and shake off the dust establish nonviolence and non-coercive defenselessness as core markers of the Christian community.
1 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 11 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (1)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The Anabaptist tradition has historically elevated Luke 10 as a foundational text for its ecclesiology of defenselessness (Wehrlosigkeit) and nonviolent discipleship.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
Jesus' vision of Satan falling like lightning is a comprehensive prophetic summary of the great cosmic controversy, spanning from Lucifer's original rebellion to his final destruction.
1 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 11 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Understands Jesus' vision of Satan falling like lightning as a prophetic summary of the great controversy, spanning Satan's original rebellion to his final destruction.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
Jesus' joy in the Holy Spirit validates the dynamic spiritual experiences and revelations granted to humble believers over intellectual elites.
1 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 11 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (1)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“This is seen as a Trinitarian window into the dynamic, joyful operation of the Spirit, who actively reveals the Father's will to 'babes'—a verse early Pentecostals frequently invoked to defend their largely uneducated, grassroots movement against the theological criticisms of established, 'wise' ecclesiastical hierarchies.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
Christ's statement of unique, mutual knowledge with the Father demonstrates a miaphysite Christology of one incarnate nature acting both humanly and divinely.
1 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 11 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (1)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“When Jesus says 'All things have been delivered to me,' Cyril insists He speaks economically according to His assumed humanity, while 'no one knows the Son except the Father' demonstrates His divine consubstantiality, requiring no division of subjects.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
Mary's posture of listening demonstrates that receiving justification through the Word of God must precede any active works of service.
1 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 11 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (1)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Mary sitting at Jesus' feet to hear the Word is the 'one thing needful' (justification by faith), which must precede and anchor all subsequent Christian service (Martha's domain).”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
The story of Martha and Mary is read typologically as a reflection on the Virgin Mary, serving as the appointed festal reading for her commemorations.
1 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 11 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (1)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Liturgically, the pericope of Martha and Mary (vv. 38-42) is the appointed Gospel reading for all major feasts of the Theotokos (the Virgin Mary), such as the Dormition and her Nativity.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
Mentionné à travers les familles — affirmé quelque part dans chaque famille, sans majorité — pas de consensus
Believers must root their highest joy and assurance in their secure heavenly citizenship rather than in their spiritual power, gifts, or ministry successes.
7 affirment · 0 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 5 silencieuxAncienne SUPPORTRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (7)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The disciples return rejoicing over their authority over demons, but Jesus redirects their joy to their heavenly citizenship, thanking the Father for revealing these truths to "babes" rather than the wise.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Upon their joyful return, he directs their rejoicing toward their heavenly citizenship.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Upon their joyful return, He speaks of witnessing Satan's fall and emphasizes that rejoicing should be rooted in salvation rather than spiritual power.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Pastoral application of Luke 10 in Reformed churches calls believers to find their ultimate assurance not in their spiritual gifts, successes, or ministries, but in God's immutable decree of election—that their 'names are written in heaven' (v. 20).” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Upon their joyful return, Jesus affirms their authority over demonic forces but redirects their joy to their assured salvation.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Finally, believers are counseled to ground their spiritual joy not in their victories over systemic evil or personal spiritual power (though these are celebrated), but in the abiding assurance of their salvation—rejoicing that their names are written in heaven.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“However, this is characteristically balanced by verse 20, which is used to caution against spiritual pride or an unhealthy fixation on the demonic, reminding the church that the ultimate source of joy is eternal salvation.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Contesté — une famille est divisée, ou les familles s’opposent (affirment vs rejettent)
The commissioning of the seventy serves as a permanent mandate and structural blueprint for broad lay, itinerant, and missionary evangelism.
4 affirment · 1 rejettent · 2 nuancent · 5 silencieuxAncienne LEANING-CONTESTEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres MIXEDqui a dit quoi (7)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“The sending of the seventy (or seventy-two) is viewed as the prefiguration of the broader presbyterate and the universal mission of the Church.” - Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
“The sending of the Seventy (vv. 1-17) is viewed as foundational for apostolic succession and the expansive mission of the Church, formally commemorated in the liturgical calendar as the Synaxis of the Seventy Apostles.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Evangelicals have historically drawn on the sending of the seventy (vv. 1-9) as a mandate for lay ministry and global mission, emphasizing that the command to pray for 'laborers' extends beyond the ordained episcopate.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Verse 2 ('the harvest is plentiful') has historically animated Baptist missionary movements, functioning as a divine mandate for local congregations to raise up and send evangelists.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“The sending out of the laborers into the harvest with minimal provisions (vv. 2-4) served as a scriptural blueprint for the itinerant preaching ministry of Methodist circuit riders.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, the sending of the seventy (Luke 10:1-11) is applied structurally to lay evangelism, inspiring the tradition's practice of sending literature evangelists and Bible workers out 'two by two.'” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“Because the tradition is inherently cessationist, these verses are never read as apostolic examples or commands for modern evangelists to expect miraculous preservation or to travel without support.”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
The instructions regarding lack of provisions and miraculous empowerment were a limited commission for a specific historical dispensation rather than universal commands for the church.
1 affirment · 3 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 8 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres MIXEDqui a dit quoi (4)
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · DENY
“Pastors and evangelists apply the sending of the seventy as a continuing call to sacrificial, itinerant labor in a 'plentiful harvest,' relying faithfully on God's provision.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · DENY
“The sending instructions (vv. 4-11) are received as a mandate for a non-coercive missiology; the gospel relies on peaceful witness, and rejection is met only by shaking off dust, never by the sword.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · DENY
“The fact that Jesus commissions seventy disciples—not just the twelve apostles—to 'heal the sick' (10:9) and cast out demons is viewed as a primary biblical warrant against cessationism, demonstrating that charismatic empowerment for mission is normative for the broader body of believers.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“The sending of the seventy was a limited commission, and the instructions regarding lack of provisions and the use of miraculous powers were specific to them, not commands or examples for later Christian evangelists.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · DENY
The authority given to the seventy proves that charismatic empowerment for mission, including healing and deliverance, continues beyond the original apostles for all disciples.
1 affirment · 1 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 10 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres MIXEDqui a dit quoi (2)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The commissioning of the seventy demonstrates that charismatic empowerment for mission, including healing and deliverance, extends beyond the Twelve to all disciples.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“The commands to carry no purse or sandals (v. 4) and the miraculous authority to heal and cast out demons (vv. 9, 17-19) are understood strictly as localized, temporary provisions for that specific era to confirm the imminent arrival of the Kingdom.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
The believers' delegated authority over demons provides a framework for the Church's active engagement in spiritual warfare.
2 affirment · 1 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 9 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres MIXEDqui a dit quoi (3)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The authority to tread on serpents and scorpions represents the tangible power given to believers to defeat demonic forces in spiritual warfare.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Pastors frequently preach on the authority given to believers 'over all the power of the enemy' (10:19) to encourage active prayer and spiritual warfare.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“The commands to carry no purse or sandals (v. 4) and the miraculous authority to heal and cast out demons (vv. 9, 17-19) are understood strictly as localized, temporary provisions for that specific era to confirm the imminent arrival of the Kingdom.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
Jesus directed the lawyer to the requirements of the Mosaic Law for eternal life strictly because the New Covenant dispensation had not yet been inaugurated.
1 affirment · 1 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 10 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme UNDETERMINEDÉglises libres MIXEDqui a dit quoi (2)
- Seventh-day Adventist · DENY
“The tradition emphasizes that Jesus points directly to the law's summary of love to God and neighbor as the standard of righteousness, demonstrating that the gospel does not abrogate obedience to the divine precepts.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Jesus directed the lawyer to the Law of Moses to inherit eternal life because the lawyer was still living under the Jewish dispensation, prior to the establishment of the New Covenant.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · DENY
The command to love God and neighbor with one's entire being defines the attainment of entire sanctification or Christian perfection.
1 affirment · 1 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 10 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme LEANING-CONTESTEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (2)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“It serves to define 'neighbor' universally, crossing ethnic and social boundaries, to show the impossible breadth of the law's demand for love.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Theologically, the lawyer's summation of the law (v. 27) stands at the very center of Wesleyan soteriology: perfect love of God and neighbor is the exact definition of entire sanctification.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
The Parable of the Good Samaritan functions as a typology of salvation, where the wounded man is fallen humanity, the Samaritan is Christ, and the inn is the Church.
4 affirment · 1 rejettent · 1 nuancent · 6 silencieuxAncienne SUPPORTRéforme MIXEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (6)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Origen and Augustine articulate the classic typology: the man going down from Jerusalem to Jericho is fallen humanity (Adam) descending into the mortality of the world; the robbers are demonic powers who strip him of grace; the priest and Levite represent the inability of the Old Law to save. The Good Samaritan is Christ himself, who binds the wounds with the oil of comfort and the wine of exhortation. The inn is the Church...” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The parable of the Good Samaritan is an allegory of humanity's fall and salvation, where the Samaritan is Christ, the beaten man is Adam, the robbers are demons, and the inn is the Church.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The Parable of the Good Samaritan is a typology of salvation where the Samaritan is Christ, the wounded man is fallen Adam, and the inn is the Church.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Anglo-Catholics, leaning on patristic tradition, have often embraced an allegorical reading of the Good Samaritan (vv. 30-37), viewing the Samaritan as Christ healing fallen humanity, the oil and wine as the sacraments, and the inn as the Church—a reading present in the sermons of the Oxford Movement.” - Lutheran · QUALIFY
“Luther's Church Postil famously reads the subsequent Good Samaritan parable (verses 30-37) typologically: the half-dead man is the sinner completely ruined by original sin; the priest and Levite represent the Law, which can diagnose but never cure; and the Samaritan is Christ Himself, who binds up the sinner's wounds, pouring in the oil and wine of the Gospel and the Sacraments.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“Where earlier theologians read the Samaritan as Christ, the inn as the Church, and the two denarii as the sacraments, Calvin’s grammatical-historical exegesis insists the parable is a straightforward, practical exposition of the moral law.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The priest and Levite in the parable symbolize the Old Testament Law and Prophets, which are powerless to cure humanity's spiritual death.
4 affirment · 1 rejettent · 1 nuancent · 6 silencieuxAncienne SUPPORTRéforme MIXEDÉglises libres LEANING-CONTESTEDqui a dit quoi (6)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Origen and Augustine articulate the classic typology: the man going down from Jerusalem to Jericho is fallen humanity (Adam) descending into the mortality of the world; the robbers are demonic powers who strip him of grace; the priest and Levite represent the inability of the Old Law to save.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The Priest and Levite represent the Old Covenant Law and Prophets, which are powerless to save.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“the priest and Levite represent the Law and the Prophets, which observed humanity's spiritual death but lacked the power to heal it.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Luther's Church Postil famously reads the subsequent Good Samaritan parable (verses 30-37) typologically: the half-dead man is the sinner completely ruined by original sin; the priest and Levite represent the Law, which can diagnose but never cure;” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“Regarding the Parable of the Good Samaritan (vv. 30-37), the Reformed tradition famously breaks from the medieval tradition of allegorizing the text.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
“The priest and Levite represent a dead, structural orthodoxy, while the Samaritan demonstrates active, risk-taking love.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The oil and wine poured by the Samaritan represent the sacramental mysteries of the Church.
5 affirment · 1 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 6 silencieuxAncienne SUPPORTRéforme MIXEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (6)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The oil and wine of the Good Samaritan are directly applied to the Church's sacramental life, particularly the Anointing of the Sick and the Eucharist, where Christ continues to act as the Divine Physician binding up the wounds of sin.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The Samaritan is Christ himself, who binds up human wounds with the healing mysteries (sacraments) of oil (chrism/unction) and wine (the Eucharist), placing the man in the inn, which represents the Church.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Christ is the Good Samaritan—a foreigner to human sin—who binds humanity's wounds with the oil of the Holy Spirit (or mercy) and the wine of the Eucharist (or discipline), carrying him on His own 'beast' (His incarnate flesh) to the inn, which represents the Church.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Anglo-Catholics, leaning on patristic tradition, have often embraced an allegorical reading of the Good Samaritan (vv. 30-37), viewing the Samaritan as Christ healing fallen humanity, the oil and wine as the sacraments, and the inn as the Church—a reading present in the sermons of the Oxford Movement.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“...and the Samaritan is Christ Himself, who binds up the sinner's wounds, pouring in the oil and wine of the Gospel and the Sacraments.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“Where earlier theologians read the Samaritan as Christ, the inn as the Church, and the two denarii as the sacraments, Calvin’s grammatical-historical exegesis insists the parable is a straightforward, practical exposition of the moral law.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The Parable of the Good Samaritan is a literal exposition of the moral law regarding neighborly love, and should not be interpreted as an allegory of salvation.
1 affirment · 5 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 6 silencieuxAncienne OPPOSERéforme MIXEDÉglises libres UNDETERMINEDqui a dit quoi (6)
- Catholic · DENY
“The parable of the Good Samaritan has been universally read through a Christological and sacramental lens since the patristic era.” - Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“The parable of the Good Samaritan (vv. 30-37) is universally interpreted through a patristic allegorical consensus: the man traveling is Adam (representing all humanity); Jerusalem is Paradise; Jericho is the fallen world; the robbers are demons who strip humanity of grace and leave it 'half dead' (spiritually wounded but still retaining the image of God).” - Oriental Orthodox · DENY
“Severus of Antioch heavily influenced the miaphysite reading of the Good Samaritan (vv. 30-37), establishing it as a grand, comprehensive typology of the economy of salvation.” - Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
“Anglo-Catholics, leaning on patristic tradition, have often embraced an allegorical reading of the Good Samaritan (vv. 30-37), viewing the Samaritan as Christ healing fallen humanity, the oil and wine as the sacraments, and the inn as the Church—a reading present in the sermons of the Oxford Movement.” - Lutheran · DENY
“In preaching and pastoral care, Lutheran pastors explicitly avoid moralizing the Good Samaritan parable into a mere command to do good, as this would produce works-righteousness.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Where earlier theologians read the Samaritan as Christ, the inn as the Church, and the two denarii as the sacraments, Calvin’s grammatical-historical exegesis insists the parable is a straightforward, practical exposition of the moral law.”
- Catholic · DENY
The parable dismantles ethnic and nationalistic boundaries, establishing a mandate for universal, practical neighbor-love that extends even to historic enemies.
8 affirment · 1 rejettent · 0 nuancent · 3 silencieuxAncienne UNDETERMINEDRéforme MIXEDÉglises libres SUPPORTqui a dit quoi (9)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“He then answers a lawyer's test by defining neighborly love through the parable of the Good Samaritan, transcending ethnic and religious boundaries.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“The chapter then moves to Jesus' teaching on the law of love through the Parable of the Good Samaritan, which redefines 'neighbor' across profound ethnic and religious boundaries as the one who demonstrates mercy.” - Lutheran · DENY
“In preaching and pastoral care, Lutheran pastors explicitly avoid moralizing the Good Samaritan parable into a mere command to do good, as this would produce works-righteousness.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“It serves to define 'neighbor' universally, crossing ethnic and social boundaries, to show the impossible breadth of the law's demand for love.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Martin Luther King Jr. heavily relied on this parable to argue for a universal brotherhood and dangerous altruism that transcends racial divides.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“John Wesley's commentary on the Good Samaritan emphasizes that 'neighbor' dissolves all ethnic, religious, and national boundaries, mandating a universal, practical love.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“John Howard Yoder and other modern Mennonite theologians emphasize that this parable is not merely about generic charity, but actively subverts ethnic and nationalistic boundaries, proving that Jesus' command to love encompasses the historic and political enemy.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Interprets the Good Samaritan parable as breaking down the barriers of prejudice and teaching that true religion requires practical, restorative love to humanity.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“The Samaritan exemplifies that true religion transcends legalistic boundaries and requires active compassion, while Mary's posture at Jesus' feet demonstrates the supremacy of the Word.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
The Good Samaritan narrative serves as the primary biblical mandate for structural social justice, mutual aid, and comprehensive healthcare ministries.
3 affirment · 1 rejettent · 4 nuancent · 4 silencieuxAncienne LEANING-CONTESTEDRéforme MIXEDÉglises libres LEANING-CONTESTEDqui a dit quoi (8)
- Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
“The Good Samaritan provides the framework for Orthodox philanthropy and hospital ministries, while also reminding the faithful of their constant need for the healing 'oil and wine' found in the sacramental life of the Church.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Broad Church and progressive wings, particularly through the 20th-century Social Gospel movement, read the Good Samaritan as the foundational mandate for structural social justice, arguing that neighbor-love requires systemic care for the vulnerable.” - Lutheran · DENY
“In preaching and pastoral care, Lutheran pastors explicitly avoid moralizing the Good Samaritan parable into a mere command to do good, as this would produce works-righteousness.” - Baptist · QUALIFY
“The Good Samaritan motivates local church initiatives in disaster relief, orphan care, and community service, framing social action as a necessary fruit of genuine conversion.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Methodists apply the Samaritan narrative directly to social ethics, driving the establishment of hospitals, orphanages, and ministries to the marginalized as concrete expressions of perfect love.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
“The Good Samaritan's example (vv. 33-37) drives the tradition's heavy investment in mutual aid, disaster relief (such as Mennonite Disaster Service), and restorative justice, insisting that faith must be proven by crossing socio-economic and cultural boundaries to care for the marginalized.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:30-37) serves as a primary biblical mandate for the Seventh-day Adventist Church's extensive global healthcare network and medical missionary work.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
“In application, the Parable of the Good Samaritan is a foundational text for Christian benevolence. 'Go, and do thou likewise' (v. 37) is treated as a direct command, motivating both individual charity and congregational relief efforts toward the destitute, regardless of their background.”
- Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
The episode of Martha and Mary provides the scriptural paradigm for distinguishing the active and contemplative lives, establishing the superiority of spiritual contemplation.
3 affirment · 1 rejettent · 6 nuancent · 2 silencieuxAncienne SUPPORTRéforme LEANING-CONTESTEDÉglises libres LEANING-CONTESTEDqui a dit quoi (10)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Thomas Aquinas synthesizes this tradition, arguing that while both are holy and necessary, the contemplative life is objectively higher (the "one thing needful") because it engages the highest human faculties and is the only part that continues into eternity.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The account of Martha and Mary (vv. 38-42) forms the scriptural bedrock for Orthodox asceticism, establishing the vital distinction between praxis (active service) and theoria (contemplation).” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Coptic and Syriac spiritual masters exhort monks and nuns to choose 'the good part' of silent contemplation at the feet of Christ, viewing active service (Martha) as necessary for communal life but recognizing unceasing prayer and attentiveness to the Word (Mary) as the supreme, eternal vocation.” - Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
“Applies the Martha and Mary narrative to illustrate the indispensable balance between active service and contemplative attention to God in the Christian life.” - Lutheran · QUALIFY
“Finally, the account of Mary and Martha (verses 38-42) is interpreted as the priority of receptive faith over active works.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · QUALIFY
“Furthermore, the account of Mary and Martha (vv. 38-42) is consistently interpreted to highlight the supreme necessity of sitting under the preached Word of God, establishing a paradigm for Reformed corporate worship and piety where the hearing of the Word is the 'one thing needful.'” - Baptist · QUALIFY
“Finally, the Mary and Martha narrative (vv. 38-42) reinforces the Baptist distinctive of the primacy of the Word; C.H. Spurgeon argued that hearing the Word is the 'one thing needful,' emphasizing that personal communion with Christ supersedes even legitimate religious activism.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · DENY
“Historically, the tradition holds the Good Samaritan and Mary of Bethany together as the essential union of 'works of mercy' and 'works of piety,' refusing to separate warm-hearted practical action from inward sanctification.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
“Finally, Mary sitting at Jesus' feet (v. 39) is applied as the necessary contemplative foundation for this active peacemaking; believers must be deeply rooted in the teachings of Jesus rather than merely distracted by the anxious striving of the world (vv. 40-42).” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
“The account of Mary and Martha is frequently preached to caution against allowing the busy, material anxieties of life—even well-intentioned service—to crowd out the 'one thing needful' (v. 42): the dedicated study and hearing of the Word of God.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Mary's choice to sit at Jesus' feet serves as a mandate for extended prayer, tarrying, and the cultivation of inward devotion over religious busyness.
6 affirment · 0 rejettent · 5 nuancent · 1 silencieuxAncienne SUPPORTRéforme LEANING-CONTESTEDÉglises libres LEANING-CONTESTEDqui a dit quoi (11)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“Monastic and contemplative orders see their specific vocation validated in Mary's choice, while active orders and lay apostolates strive for a "mixed life" where action flows from contemplation.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“While Martha's service is honorable, Mary's choice to sit at the Lord's feet is championed by hesychast theology as the superior path of inner stillness, spiritual vision, and unceasing prayer.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Mary sitting at Jesus' feet represents the superiority of spiritual contemplation over the distractions of active worldly service.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“In spiritual direction, Anglican pastoral practice frequently uses Martha and Mary to counsel an integrated rule of life, warning against the activism of Martha untethered from the contemplative prayer of Mary.” - Lutheran · QUALIFY
“The Mary and Martha narrative is frequently applied to underscore the centrality of the Divine Service, reminding the faithful that their primary duty is to receive Christ's gifts through the hearing of the Word before turning to the anxieties and tasks of their daily vocations.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · QUALIFY
“Furthermore, it exhorts Christians to active, sacrificial mercy ministry to all people in distress, recognizing every human being as a neighbor, while prioritizing the reading and preaching of Scripture above the anxious busyness of daily life.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Finally, pastors regularly preach the Mary and Martha account to urge believers to prioritize daily Bible reading and personal devotion, warning against the danger of burning out in church volunteerism at the expense of sitting at Jesus' feet.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Believers are urged to sit at Jesus' feet like Mary to cultivate inward holiness through the spiritual disciplines (works of piety), recognizing that this 'one thing needful' fuels the outward, sacrificial compassion modeled by the Good Samaritan (works of mercy).” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Mary's choice to sit at Jesus' feet is championed as the biblical model for 'tarrying,' extended worship, and seeking the presence of God over mere religious busyness.” - Seventh-day Adventist · QUALIFY
“Finally, the story of Martha and Mary (Luke 10:38-42) provides a necessary pastoral caution within a highly active denomination, warning that rigorous institutional service and health ministry must never eclipse personal spiritual devotion at the feet of Christ.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
“The account of Mary and Martha is frequently preached to caution against allowing the busy, material anxieties of life—even well-intentioned service—to crowd out the 'one thing needful' (v. 42): the dedicated study and hearing of the Word of God.”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
Étape 7Générer la New Consensus Bible
À partir du texte en langue originale. Les traditions documentent la réception ; elles ne votent pas sur la formulation. Chaque formulation contestée tranchée par le rendu est listée ci-dessous, et non masquée.
1Now after these things the Lord appointed seventy-two others also, and sent them two by two before his face into every city and place where he himself was about to come. 2Then he said to them: The harvest is indeed abundant, but the laborers are few; pray therefore to the Lord of the harvest, that he may send out laborers into his harvest. 3Go; look, I send you out as lambs in the midst of wolves. 4Bear no bag, no knapsack, no sandals; and greet no one on the way. 5And into whatever house you enter, first say, 'Peace to this house.' 6And if a son of peace is there, your peace will rest upon him; but if not, it will return to you. 7Remain in that house, eating and drinking what they have; for the laborer is worthy of his wages. Do not move from house to house. 8And into whatever city you enter, and they receive you, eat the things set before you, 9and heal the sick who are in it, and tell them, 'The kingdom of God has come near upon you.' 10But into whatever city you enter, and they do not receive you, going out into its broad streets, say, 11'Even the dust that clings to us from your city to our feet, we wipe off against you; nevertheless know this, that the kingdom of God has come near upon you.' 12But I tell you that in that day it will be more tolerable for Sodom than for that city. 13Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the powers generated in Tyre and Sidon had been generated in you, they would have repented long ago, sitting in sackcloth and ashes. 14But it will be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon in the judgment than for you. 15And you, Capernaum, will you be exalted to heaven? You will be brought down to Hades. 16The one hearing you hears me, and the one rejecting you rejects me; but the one rejecting me rejects the one who sent me. 17The seventy-two returned with joy, saying, 'Lord, even the demons are subjected to us in your name.' 18He said to them, 'I was watching Satan falling like lightning from heaven. 19Look, I have given you the authority to tread upon serpents and scorpions, and upon all the power of the enemy, and nothing will by any means injure you. 20Nevertheless, do not rejoice in this, that the spirits are subjected to you; but rejoice that your names are written in the heavens.' 21In that hour he rejoiced in the Holy Spirit and said, 'I confess to you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you hid these things from the wise and understanding, and revealed them to infants; yes, Father, because so it became a good pleasure before you.' 22All things were handed over to me by my Father, and no one knows who the Son is except the Father, and who the Father is except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son desires to reveal him. 23And turning to the disciples privately he said, 'Blessed are the eyes seeing what you see; 24for I tell you that many prophets and kings desired to see what you see, and saw them not, and to hear what you hear, and heard them not.' 25And look, a certain lawyer stood up testing him and saying, 'Teacher, having done what, will I inherit eternal life?' 26He said to him, 'What is written in the Law? How do you read it?' 27And answering he said, 'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbor as yourself.' 28He said to him, 'You answered correctly; do this, and you will live.' 29But he, desiring to justify himself, said to Jesus, 'And who is my neighbor?' 30Taking up the question, Jesus said: 'A certain man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among robbers, who stripping him and striking him, departed, leaving him half dead. 31And by chance a certain priest was going down on that road, and seeing him, passed by on the opposite side. 32And in like manner also a Levite, coming to the place and seeing him, passed by on the opposite side. 33But a certain Samaritan, journeying, came down to him, and seeing him, was moved with compassion, 34and approaching he bound up his wounds, pouring on oil and wine; and putting him on his own beast, he brought him to an inn and provided care for him. 35And on the next day, taking out two denarii he gave them to the innkeeper and said, 'Provide care for him, and whatever you spend additionally, I will repay you when I return.' 36Which of these three seems to you to have become a neighbor to the one having fallen among the robbers? 37He said, 'The one having done mercy with him.' Then Jesus said to him, 'Go, and you do likewise.' 38Now as they were traveling, he entered into a certain village; and a certain woman named Martha received him into her house. 39And she had a sister called Mary, who also sat at the Lord's feet and was listening to his word. 40But Martha was distracted about much serving; and standing by she said, 'Lord, do you not care that my sister left me to serve alone? Tell her therefore that she may help me.' 41But answering, the Lord said to her, 'Martha, Martha, you are anxious and troubled about many things, 42but there is need of few things, or of one. For Mary chose the good part, which will not be taken away from her.'
Choix effectués — chaque conflit que le rendu a tranché
| Verset | Source | Options | Choix | Pourquoi | Cat. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | ἑβδομήκοντα δύο | (T) seventy, seventy-two, (S) seventy-two, (A) seventy, seventy-two | seventy-two | Textual evidence is divided, but the source text block provided explicitly reads ἑβδομήκοντα δύο. | textual |
| v1 | οὗ | (T) whither, where, (S) where | where | Updates archaic vocabulary to modern standard English. | stylistic |
| v1 | ἤμελλεν αὐτὸς ἔρχεσθαι | (T) was about to come, would come, was to come, (S) was about to come | was about to come | Accurately reflects the imminent, planned intent of the verb ἤμελλεν. | lexical |
| v2 | ἔλεγεν δὲ | (T) And, Then, Therefore said, (S) Then he said | Then he said | Translates the transitional conjunction dè appropriately without over-specifying causation. | lexical |
| v2 | πολύς | (T) great, plentiful, plenteous, abundant, (S) abundant/plentiful | abundant | Emphasizes the massive volume and yield of the harvest rather than mere size. | lexical |
| v2 | ἐργάται | (T) laborers, workmen, (S) laborers | laborers | Maintains the agricultural connotation of the noun consistently across the verse. | lexical |
| v2 | δεήθητε | (T) pray, beseech, supplicate, (S) pray | pray | Uses a standard English verb for petitioning the divine. | lexical |
| v3 | ἐν μέσῳ | (T) among, in the midst of, (S) in the midst of | in the midst of | Translates the spatial prepositional phrase exactly. | lexical |
| v4 | βαστάζετε βαλλάντιον | (T) carry purse/bag, (S) bear bag | bear bag | Utilizes alliteration to reflect the morphological wordplay in the source language. | stylistic |
| v4 | μὴ ... μὴ ... μὴ | (T) neither/nor, no/nor, (S) no/no/no | no ... no ... no | Preserves the repetitive negative structure emphasizing the lack of provisions. | stylistic |
| v4 | μηδένα | (T) no man, no one, (S) no one | no one | Uses inclusive contemporary pronoun reflecting the unbounded indefinite object. | lexical |
| v5 | ἣν δ᾽ ἂν | (T) whatsoever, whatever, (S) whatever | whatever | Replaces archaic phrasing with natural contemporary syntax. | stylistic |
| v6 | ἐπ᾽ αὐτὸν ... ὑμῶν/ὑμᾶς | (T) upon it ... your/you, upon him ... your/you, (S) upon him ... your/you | upon him ... your/you | Preserves the specific singular-to-plural number shift present in the Greek. | grammatical |
| v7 | τὰ παρ᾽ αὐτῶν | (T) such things as they give, the things they have, (S) what they have | what they have | Translates the prepositional phrase idiomatically into smooth English. | stylistic |
| v7 | μισθοῦ | (T) hire, wages, (S) wages | wages | Provides the modern term for worker compensation. | lexical |
| v9 | ἤγγικεν ἐφ᾽ ὑμᾶς | (T) is come nigh unto you, has come near to you, (S) has come near upon you | has come near upon you | Translates the directional preposition correctly, maintaining the refrain that repeats in verse 11. | lexical |
| v10 | εἰς ἣν δ᾽ ἂν πόλιν εἰσέλθητε | (T) into whatever city you enter, (S) into whatever city you enter | into whatever city you enter | Preserves the exact refrain structure initiated in verse 8. | stylistic |
| v12 | ἐν τῇ ἡμέρᾳ ἐκείνῃ ... τῇ πόλει ἐκείνῃ | (T) in that day ... for that city, (S) in that day ... that city | in that day ... that city | Highlights the demonstrative repetition comparing the temporal and physical subjects. | stylistic |
| v13 | Οὐαί σοι ... οὐαί σοι | (T) Woe to thee/you ... woe to thee/you, (S) Woe to you ... woe to you | Woe to you ... woe to you | Preserves the repetitive prophetic judgment formula in modern English. | stylistic |
| v13 | αἱ δυνάμεις αἱ γενόμεναι | (T) the mighty works that were done, (S) the powers generated / the miracles that were done | the powers generated | Captures the cognate root linking the nature of the powers and their occurrence. | lexical |
| v15 | μὴ ἕως τοῦ οὐρανοῦ ὑψωθήσῃ; ἕως τοῦ ᾅδου καταβήσῃ | (T) which art exalted to heaven, shalt be brought down to hades, (S) will you be exalted to heaven? You will be brought down to Hades | will you be exalted to heaven? You will be brought down to Hades | Renders the interrogative particle directly to set up the chiastic spatial contrast. | grammatical |
| v16 | ὁ ἀκούων ... ἀκούει ... ἀθετῶν ... ἀθετεῖ | (T) He that hears ... hears ... rejects ... rejects, (S) The one hearing ... hears ... rejecting ... rejects | The one hearing ... hears ... rejecting ... rejects | Preserves the repetitive participial chiasm exactly without flattening the grammar. | stylistic |
| v17 | δαιμόνια | (T) demons, devils, (S) demons | demons | Translates the specific Greek term distinctively from the title devil. | lexical |
| v17 | ὑποτάσσεται | (T) subject unto, subjected to, (S) subjected to | subjected to | Conveys the present passive voice directly. | grammatical |
| v18 | ὡς ἀστραπὴν ἐκ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ πεσόντα | (T) fall like lightning from heaven, fallen as lightning from heaven, (S) falling like lightning from heaven | falling like lightning from heaven | Maintains the vivid participle modifying Satan's descent. | grammatical |
| v19 | ἐξουσίαν | (T) power, authority, (S) authority | authority | Distinguishes delegated relational authority from raw power. | lexical |
| v20 | μὴ χαίρετε ... χαίρετε δὲ | (T) rejoice not ... but rejoice, (S) do not rejoice ... but rejoice | do not rejoice ... but rejoice | Emphasizes the contrasting repetition regarding the true source of joy. | stylistic |
| v20 | ὅτι | (T) that, because, (S) that | that | Translates the subordinate conjunction naturally in context. | grammatical |
| v21 | ἠγαλλιάσατο | (T) Jesus rejoiced, he rejoiced, (S) rejoiced | he rejoiced | Avoids interpolating 'Jesus' where the source text only implies the subject via verb ending. | textual |
| v21 | τῷ πνεύματι τῷ ἁγίῳ | (T) spirit, the Holy Spirit, (S) the Holy Spirit | the Holy Spirit | The provided source text explicitly includes the modifiers for the Holy Spirit. | textual |
| v21 | ἐξομολογοῦμαί | (T) I thank, I praise, I confess, (S) I confess/praise | I confess | Retains the public, declarative nature of the Greek verb of thanksgiving. | lexical |
| v22 | πατρός ... πατήρ ... υἱὸς | (T) Father ... Father ... Son, (S) Father ... Father ... Son | Father ... Father ... Son | Preserves the chiastic arrangement of divine titles exactly. | stylistic |
| v22 | παρεδόθη | (T) are, have been, were, (S) were handed over | were handed over | Directly translates the aorist passive verb. | grammatical |
| v22 | εἰ μὴ | (T) but, except, save, (S) except | except | Clearly renders the exclusionary condition in modern English. | lexical |
| v24 | ἰδεῖν ... εἶδαν | (T) to see ... saw not, (S) to see ... saw | to see ... saw | Captures the lexical repetition representing sensory experience. | stylistic |
| v25 | ἐκπειράζων | (T) tempted, testing, trying, (S) testing | testing | Retains the cognate concept of examining without the later theological baggage of enticement to sin. | lexical |
| v27 | ἐξ ὅλης ... καὶ ἐν ὅλῃ ... | (T) with all ... and with all ..., (S) with all ... and with all ... | with all ... and with all ... | Reflects the fourfold repetition of the prepositional requirement. | stylistic |
| v28 | τοῦτο ποίει | (T) this do, do this, (S) do this | do this | Translates the demonstrative command cleanly into modern English. | grammatical |
| v29 | θέλων δικαιῶσαι | (T) willing to justify, desiring to justify, (S) desiring to justify | desiring to justify | Renders the active participle clearly in modern vocabulary. | lexical |
| v30 | ἐκδύσαντες ... ἐπιθέντες ... ἀφέντες | (T) stripped ... wounded ... departed, (S) stripping ... striking ... departing/leaving | stripping ... striking ... departed, leaving | Employs English participles to echo the aorist participle assonance of the Greek. | grammatical |
| v31 | ἰδὼν αὐτὸν ἀντιπαρῆλθεν | (T) seeing him passed by on the other side, (S) seeing him, passed by on the opposite side | seeing him, passed by on the opposite side | Establishes the precise repetitive phrase for avoidance reused in verse 32. | stylistic |
| v33 | ἰδὼν αὐτὸν ἐσπλαγχνίσθη | (T) seeing him was moved with compassion, (S) seeing him, was moved with compassion | seeing him, was moved with compassion | Forms the crucial contrast to the identical visual response set up in the preceding two verses. | lexical |
| v34 | ἐπιχέων ... ἐπιβιβάσας ... ἐπεμελήθη | (T) pouring in/on ... set/putting ... took care of, (S) pouring on ... putting on ... provided care for | pouring on ... putting on ... provided care for | Reflects the shared spatial prefixes and creates a lexical link to verse 35. | stylistic |
| v35 | ἐπιμελήθητι | (T) Take care of, Be careful of, (S) Provide care for | Provide care for | Translates the cognate imperative linking directly back to the caregiver's action in verse 34. | lexical |
| v36 | τίς ... πλησίον δοκεῖ σοι γεγονέναι | (T) Which ... was/proved/seemed to be neighbor, (S) Who ... seems to you to have become a neighbor | Who ... seems to you to have become a neighbor | Completes the inclusio bracket introduced in verse 29 with precise syntax. | stylistic |
| v37 | ὁ ποιήσας ... ποίει | (T) He that showed/did ... do, (S) The one having done ... do | The one having done ... do | Retains the lexical link between the Samaritan's action and Jesus' concluding command. | lexical |
| v40 | διακονίαν ... διακονεῖν | (T) serving ... to serve, (S) serving ... to serve | serving ... to serve | Preserves the direct cognate repetition concerning Martha's labor. | lexical |
| v41 | Μάρθα Μάρθα | (T) Martha, Martha, (S) Martha, Martha | Martha, Martha | Retains the repetitive, intimate address by the Lord. | stylistic |
| v42 | ὀλίγων ἢ ἑνός | (T) one thing, of one thing, (S) few things or one | few things or one | Translates the longer, more difficult Greek reading provided in the base text exactly. | textual |
Limites à connaître
- This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
- The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
- The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
- The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
- One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
- The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
- Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
- The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.