ManyBibles

2 Thessaloniciens 2

7 traductions · lu à travers 12 traditions.

NCB · Nouvelle Bible du Consensus

1Now we ask you, brothers, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to him, 2not to be quickly shaken in mind or troubled, neither by spirit nor by word nor by letter as if from us, claiming that the day of the Lord has already come. 3Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, 4the one opposing and exalting himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God as God, displaying himself that he is God. 5Do you not remember that when I was still with you, I used to tell you these things? 6And now you know what is restraining him, so that he may be revealed in his own time. 7For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only there is one who restrains now, until he is taken out of the way. 8And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will slay with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the appearance of his coming. 9The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, 10and with every deception of unrighteousness for those who are perishing, because they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved. 11And for this reason God sends them a working of delusion, so that they believe the lie, 12in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in unrighteousness. 13But we are obligated to always give thanks to God for you, brothers loved by the Lord, because God chose you as firstfruits for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth, 14to which he called you through our gospel, for the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. 15So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught, whether by word or by our letter. 16Now may our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God our Father, who loved us and gave us eternal comfort and good hope by grace, 17comfort your hearts and establish you in every good work and word.

Rendu généré par l’IA, et non une traduction humaine. Lire 2 Thessaloniciens 2 dans Nouvelle Bible du Consensus →

Ce sur quoi les traditions s’accordent

All traditions universally agree that Paul corrects eschatological panic by clarifying that the Day of the Lord must be preceded by a great apostasy and the revelation of the man of sin. Several traditions specify that this man of sin takes his seat in the visible Christian church, and some interpret his destruction by the breath of Christ's mouth as the victory of the preached Word over spiritual tyranny. However, the chapter's eschatological symbols are highly disputed; traditions divide over… Connectez-vous pour lire le consensus complet →

Là où les traditions diffèrent

  • The 'man of sin' is a literal, future Antichrist who will demand divine worship.

    catholic: AFFIRM; orthodox: AFFIRM; oriental-orthodox: AFFIRM; lutheran: QUALIFY; reformed: QUALIFY; baptist: QUALIFY; anabaptist: QUALIFY; adventist: DENY; restorationist: DENY

  • The 'man of sin' sitting in the temple of God represents the historical Papacy usurping Christ's authority.

    anglican: QUALIFY; lutheran: AFFIRM; reformed: QUALIFY; baptist: QUALIFY; methodist: QUALIFY; anabaptist: QUALIFY; adventist: AFFIRM; restorationist: AFFIRM

  • The 'restrainer' holding back the lawless one represents the Roman Empire and the stabilizing force of civil law.

    catholic: QUALIFY; orthodox: AFFIRM; pentecostal: DENY; adventist: QUALIFY

  • The 'restrainer' holding back the lawless one is the Holy Spirit residing within the Church.

    orthodox: QUALIFY; baptist: QUALIFY; pentecostal: AFFIRM; adventist: DENY

  • God actively sends a 'strong delusion' as a righteous, sovereign judgment upon the reprobate to ensure they believe a lie.

    oriental-orthodox: DENY; reformed: AFFIRM; methodist: DENY; anabaptist: QUALIFY; adventist: QUALIFY

  • The 'strong delusion' is the withdrawal of divine grace resulting from a free human rejection of the truth, rather than an active predestination to damnation.

    oriental-orthodox: AFFIRM; reformed: DENY; methodist: AFFIRM; adventist: QUALIFY

  • The assertion that God chose believers 'from the beginning to salvation' demonstrates unconditional, eternal election.

    anglican: QUALIFY; lutheran: AFFIRM; reformed: AFFIRM; baptist: QUALIFY; methodist: DENY

  • Divine election to salvation is conditional upon belief and is inextricably linked to the ongoing process of sanctification.

    orthodox: QUALIFY; anglican: QUALIFY; lutheran: DENY; reformed: DENY; baptist: QUALIFY; methodist: AFFIRM

  • The command to hold fast to traditions establishes the equal dogmatic and liturgical authority of the Church's unwritten Holy Tradition alongside written Scripture.

    catholic: AFFIRM; orthodox: AFFIRM; oriental-orthodox: AFFIRM; anglican: DENY; lutheran: DENY; reformed: DENY; baptist: DENY; adventist: DENY; restorationist: DENY

  • The 'traditions' believers are commanded to hold refer strictly to authoritative apostolic teachings that are now exclusively contained within the written biblical canon.

    catholic: DENY; orthodox: DENY; oriental-orthodox: DENY; anglican: DENY; lutheran: AFFIRM; reformed: AFFIRM; baptist: AFFIRM; adventist: AFFIRM; restorationist: AFFIRM

  • The apostolic traditions validate the retention of historic church order and liturgy provided they do not contradict Scripture.

    catholic: QUALIFY; orthodox: DENY; oriental-orthodox: QUALIFY; anglican: AFFIRM; restorationist: DENY

  • The warnings regarding the Day of the Lord serve to discourage apocalyptic date-setting and redirect believers toward ascetical steadfastness and good works.

    orthodox: AFFIRM; oriental-orthodox: AFFIRM; anglican: AFFIRM; anabaptist: QUALIFY

Comment chaque tradition l’interprète

Chaque lecture a été générée isolément — aucune tradition ne voit la réponse d’une autre.

Catholic

Paul corrects an eschatological panic among the Thessalonians, who had been unsettled by false reports that the Day of the Lord had already arrived. He outlines an apocalyptic timeline, explaining that Christ's return will be preceded by a widespread 'rebellion' or apostasy and the revelation of the 'man of sin' or 'lawless one,' who will set himself up as God in the temple. Paul reminds them of a 'restrainer' that currently holds this lawless figure back, though the 'mystery of lawlessness' is already at work. Once the restrainer is removed, the lawless one will emerge with satanic power and deceptive signs, but the Lord Jesus will effortlessly destroy him with the breath of His mouth. Those who reject the truth will be handed over to a strong delusion. In contrast, Paul gives thanks for the Thessalonians' election and sanctification, concluding with a crucial exhortation to stand firm and hold fast to the traditions they received, whether transmitted orally ('by word') or in writing ('by letter'). Reception: This chapter is a foundational text in Catholic theology, serving as a primary locus for two major areas: the transmission of Revelation and eschatology. Verse 15 is the classic scriptural cornerstone for the Catholic doctrine of Sacred Tradition. The Council of Trent, in its Decree Concerning the Canonical Scriptures, and the Second Vatican Council, in Dei Verbum, cite verse 15 to affirm that the Gospel is transmitted through both written Scripture and unwritten traditions, which together form a single, unified deposit of faith. This reading is heavily informed by the Eastern Fathers; John Chrysostom asserts plainly from this text that the Apostles delivered many things without writing, and 'both are worthy of belief.' Basil the Great points to this verse to validate the unwritten liturgical traditions of the Church, such as the sign of the cross and the orientation of prayer. Regarding the eschatological warning in verses 3-12, the tradition identifies the 'man of sin' as the Antichrist. Irenaeus of Lyons reads the figure sitting in the temple as the ultimate Antichrist who recapitulates all human rebellion. The Catechism of the Catholic Church draws on the 'mystery of iniquity' and the 'rebellion' to describe the Church's final trial, a supreme religious deception offering a pseudo-messianism. The identity of the 'restrainer' (katechon) in verses 6-7 remains an acknowledged mystery in the tradition; Augustine of Hippo famously admits his ignorance regarding its exact meaning in the City of God, though he notes the common early Patristic view that it referred to the Roman Empire.

Eastern Orthodox

In this chapter, the Apostle Paul addresses a profound eschatological misunderstanding among the Thessalonians, who had been unsettled by false reports that the Day of the Lord had already arrived. Paul asserts that this day will not come until specific events unfold: a great apostasy, and the revelation of the 'man of sin' or 'son of destruction,' who will arrogantly seat himself in the temple of God. Paul reminds them of what he previously taught regarding a current restraining force holding back this lawless one. Though the 'mystery of lawlessness' is already active, the ultimate lawless one will only appear when the restrainer is removed, after which Christ will destroy him with the breath of His mouth. God will send a strong delusion upon those who reject the truth. Paul then pivots to a prayer of thanksgiving for the Thessalonians' election to salvation, charging them to stand firm and hold tightly to the traditions they received, whether delivered orally or by written letter. Reception: Within the Eastern Orthodox tradition, this chapter is of paramount dogmatic importance, primarily because of verse 15. The command to 'hold the traditions' (paradosis) received 'by word or by epistle' forms the biblical bedrock for the Orthodox understanding of Holy Tradition. Patristic consensus, articulated strongly by figures like Basil the Great and John of Damascus, interprets this verse to mean that the unwritten traditions of the Church (such as liturgical rites, the sign of the cross, and the veneration of icons) possess the exact same force of piety and dogmatic authority as the written Scriptures. Eschatologically, the chapter provides the core framework for Orthodox teachings on the Antichrist. John Chrysostom famously identified the 'restrainer' as the Roman Empire—representing the rule of civil law and order—whose eventual collapse would pave the way for the Antichrist's political and spiritual tyranny. Other patristic voices suggested the restrainer was the grace of the Holy Spirit. Furthermore, verses 13 and 14, which speak of 'sanctification of the Spirit' leading to the 'obtaining of the glory of our Lord,' are understood organically within the framework of theosis, viewing salvation not merely as a legal pardon but as active participation in Christ's uncreated divine glory.

Oriental Orthodox

In this chapter, the Apostle Paul addresses a state of panic among the Thessalonians who believed the 'day of Christ' had already arrived (verses 1-2). He outlines the necessary prerequisites for the eschaton: a great 'falling away' and the revelation of the 'man of sin' or 'son of perdition' who will usurp the temple of God (verses 3-4). Paul reminds them of a 'restrainer' that currently holds back this mystery of lawlessness (verses 6-7). When the lawless one is eventually revealed with Satanic signs and deception, the Lord will destroy him with the breath of His mouth (verses 8-10). God sends a strong delusion upon those who reject the truth, allowing them to believe a lie (verses 11-12). Paul concludes by giving thanks for the believers' election and sanctification, exhorting them to stand firm in the apostolic traditions passed down by word and epistle (verse 15), and praying for their comfort and establishment in good works (verses 16-17). Reception: For the Oriental Orthodox communion, this chapter is a primary locus for both its ecclesiology and its eschatological realism. The injunction to hold the traditions taught 'whether by word, or our epistle' (verse 15) forms the bedrock of the Oriental Orthodox understanding of Holy Tradition. Rather than pitting Scripture against Church practice, the tradition views the 'word' and 'epistle' as two harmonious streams of one apostolic deposit. Coptic Pope Shenouda III heavily utilizes verse 15 to defend the Apostolic origins of unwritten practices—such as the Divine Liturgy, the sign of the cross, and the rites of the sacraments—against strict textualism, arguing that the life of the miaphysite Church is the living continuation of this oral instruction. Eschatologically, the Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian churches—having endured centuries of severe historical persecution—have frequently engaged with the 'man of sin' and the 'mystery of lawlessness' (verses 3-10). Apocalyptic texts from within the tradition, most notably the Syriac 'Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius', drew heavily on Paul's imagery of the lawless one's deceptive power (verse 9) to make sense of geopolitical catastrophes and the rise of opposing empires, interpreting the 'falling away' and the 'restrainer' within their own historical suffering. Furthermore, the 'working of error' or 'strong delusion' (verse 11) is understood patristically not as a coercive predestination by God, but as the total withdrawal of divine grace from those who have actively chosen the 'deceit of unrighteousness' (verse 10), leaving them to the natural consequences of their darkened wills.

9 autres traditions lisent ce chapitre.

Connectez-vous pour lire les 12 →

Toutes les traductions

Le même chapitre dans 7 traductions du domaine public.

WEB · World English Bible

1Now, brothers, concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to him, we ask you 2not to be quickly shaken in your mind or troubled, either by spirit or by word or by letter as if from us, saying that the day of Christ has already come. 3Let no one deceive you in any way. For it will not be unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of destruction. 4He opposes and exalts himself against all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, setting himself up as God. 5Don’t you remember that when I was still with you, I told you these things? 6Now you know what is restraining him, to the end that he may be revealed in his own season. 7For the mystery of lawlessness already works. Only there is one who restrains now, until he is taken out of the way. 8Then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will kill with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the manifestation of his coming; 9even he whose coming is according to the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 10and with all deception of wickedness for those who are being lost, because they didn’t receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11Because of this, God sends them a powerful delusion, that they should believe a lie, 12that they all might be judged who didn’t believe the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 13But we are bound to always give thanks to God for you, brothers loved by the Lord, because God chose you from the beginning for salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief in the truth, 14to which he called you through our Good News, for the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. 15So then, brothers, stand firm and hold the traditions which you were taught by us, whether by word or by letter. 16Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God our Father, who loved us and gave us eternal comfort and good hope through grace, 17comfort your hearts and establish you in every good work and word.

KJV · King James Version

1Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, 2That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. 3Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. 5Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? 6And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. 7For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 8And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: 9Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, 10And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 13But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: 14Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. 15Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle. 16Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God, even our Father, which hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace, 17Comfort your hearts, and stablish you in every good word and work.

5 traductions supplémentaires à comparer, côte à côte.

Connectez-vous pour comparer les 7 →
Différences qui changent le sens (31)
  • v1 [stylistic]: Variations in preposition phrasing ('unto' vs 'to'). — “together unto” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DRC) vs “to” (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER)
  • v2 [stylistic]: Variations in conjunctions ('nor by', 'or', 'neither through'). — “nor by” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “or” (WEB, ASV) vs “neither through” (YLT)
  • v2 [lexical]: Translation of 'epistolēs' (letter vs epistle) and conjunction choice. — “nor by letter” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “or” (WEB) vs “or epistle” (ASV) vs “neither through letters” (YLT) vs “epistle” (DRC)
  • v2 [grammatical]: Phrasing of the conditional source ('as from', 'as if', 'sent'). — “from” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “if” (WEB) vs “through” (YLT) vs “if it were by” (DARBY) vs “sent” (DRC)
  • v2 [grammatical]: Conjunctions introducing the false statement ('as that', 'saying', 'if'). — “as that” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “saying” (WEB) vs “if” (DRC)
  • v2 [textual]: Textual variant between 'Christ' and 'the Lord', and lexical translation of 'enestēken' (at hand vs already come). — “Christ is at hand” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “has already come” (WEB) vs “the Lord just” (ASV) vs “hath arrived” (YLT) vs “the Lord present” (DARBY) vs “the Lord were” (DRC)
  • v3 [lexical]: Translation of 'mē tis' (no man vs not anyone) and 'exapatēsē' (deceive vs beguile). — “no man deceive” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “not any one” (YLT, DARBY) vs “one” (WEB) vs “beguile” (ASV)
  • v3 [stylistic]: Preposition choice ('in' vs 'by' any means). — “in” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “by” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
  • v3 [grammatical]: Use of definite article versus demonstrative pronoun ('the' vs 'that'). — “the” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “that” (KJV, WEBSTER)
  • v3 [grammatical]: Differences in verb tense and mood ('be', 'is', 'have been'). — “be” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “is” (WEB) vs “have been” (DARBY)
  • v3 [lexical]: Translation of 'apōleias' (perdition vs destruction). — “perdition” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “destruction” (WEB) vs “the destruction” (YLT)
  • v4 [grammatical]: Syntactic handling of the participle 'antikeimenos' (relative clause vs demonstrative vs participle). — “Who opposeth” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “He opposes” (WEB) vs “he that” (ASV) vs “is opposing” (YLT) vs “opposes” (DARBY)
  • v4 [lexical]: Translation of 'hyperairomenos' (exalts, lifted up) and preposition choice ('above', 'against'). — “exalteth himself above” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “exalts against” (WEB) vs “against” (ASV) vs “is raising up” (YLT) vs “exalts on high against” (DARBY) vs “is lifted up” (DRC)
  • v4 [interpretive]: Differences in how the man of sin presents himself ('that he is', 'up as', 'as if'). — “that he is” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “up as” (WEB) vs “forth as” (ASV) vs “off” (YLT) vs “as if were” (DRC)
  • v5 [stylistic]: Phrasing of the rhetorical question ('Remember ye not' vs 'Don't you remember'). — “Remember ye not” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “Do remember” (YLT, DARBY) vs “Don’t you” (WEB) vs “you” (DRC)
  • v5 [grammatical]: Translation of the temporal participle 'ōn' (being, when I was yet, still). — “when I was yet” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “being” (YLT, DARBY) vs “still” (WEB)
  • v6 [lexical]: Translation of 'kairō' (time vs season). — “time” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “own season” (WEB, ASV) vs “own” (YLT, DARBY)
  • v8 [textual]: Textual variant adding 'Jesus', and translation of 'anelei' (consume, kill, slay). — “shall consume” (KJV, YLT) vs “will kill” (WEB) vs “Jesus slay” (ASV) vs “Jesus” (DARBY) vs “will” (WEBSTER) vs “Jesus kill” (DRC)
  • v8 [lexical]: Translation of 'pneumati' (spirit vs breath). — “spirit” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “breath” (WEB, ASV, DARBY)
  • v8 [lexical]: Translation of 'katargēsei' (destroy, bring to nought, annul). — “shall destroy with” (KJV, YLT, DRC) vs “by” (WEB) vs “bring to nought by” (ASV) vs “annul by” (DARBY) vs “will” (WEBSTER)
  • v8 [lexical]: Translation of 'epiphaneia' (manifestation, brightness, appearing). — “manifestation” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “brightness” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “appearing” (DARBY)
  • v8 [lexical]: Translation of 'parousias' (coming vs presence). — “coming” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “presence” (YLT) vs “him” (DRC)
  • v9 [lexical]: Translation of the preposition 'kata' (according to vs after). — “according to” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “after” (KJV, WEBSTER)
  • v9 [lexical]: Translation of 'Satana' (Satan vs Adversary) and preposition choice. — “Satan with” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “in” (DARBY, DRC) vs “the Adversary in” (YLT)
  • v10 [stylistic]: Preposition choice ('with' vs 'in'). — “with” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “in” (YLT, DARBY, DRC)
  • v10 [lexical]: Translation of 'apatē' (deceit, deception, seduction). — “deceivableness” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “deceit” (ASV, DARBY) vs “deception” (WEB) vs “deceitfulness” (YLT) vs “seduction” (DRC)
  • v13 [grammatical]: Preposition choice ('of' vs 'in') and text misalignment due to verse numbering differences. — “Spirit and belief of” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “in” (WEB) vs “purchasing” (DRC)
  • v14 [stylistic]: Text misalignment artifact resulting from different verse numbering traditions. — “Lord Jesus Christ” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “epistle” (DRC)
  • v16 [grammatical]: Preposition choice ('through', 'in', 'by') and text misalignment artifact. — “hope through grace” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “in” (YLT) vs “by” (DARBY) vs “work and word” (DRC)
  • v17 [lexical]: Translation of 'parakalesai' (comfort vs encourage). — “Comfort” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “encourage” (DARBY)
  • v17 [grammatical]: Differences in supplied object pronouns ('you', 'them', or none) and spelling variations. — “establish” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “stablish you” (KJV) vs “establish them” (ASV)

Derrière cette page

Texte source. Greek (TAGNT, public-domain critical text). Public domain NA28/UBS5-equivalent eclectic Greek text

Noms divins : Kyrios (Lord), Theos (God).

Également consultées, mais non incluses dans le consensus

Academic textual-historical analysis

In its immediate historical and literary context, 2 Thessalonians 2 is an apocalyptic discourse designed to quell an eschatological panic. The author writes to a community shaken by the claim—allegedly circulated via prophetic utterance, oral report, or a forged letter (v. 2)—that the 'day of the Lord' has already arrived. To counter this, the text establishes a strict apocalyptic timetable, asserting that the end will not come until two events occur: the 'rebellion' (apostasia) and the revelation of the 'man of lawlessness' (or 'man of sin', v. 3). This antagonist is described using imagery drawn from the Book of Daniel and the historical trauma of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, as well as the more recent memory of the Roman Emperor Caligula's attempt to place his statue in the Jerusalem temple, culminating in the antagonist taking a seat in the 'temple of God' to claim divine status (v. 4). The text introduces a highly debated apocalyptic figure or force: the 'restrainer' (to katechon in the neuter, v. 6; ho katechōn in the masculine, v. 7), which currently holds back the full manifestation of lawlessness until its appointed time. The chapter concludes with a thanksgiving and a paraenetic exhortation to hold fast to the traditions previously taught (vv. 13-17).

Jewish interpretation

In its immediate literary context as an early Christian epistle, the author writes to calm a community anxious that the eschatological 'day of the Lord' has already arrived. The text asserts that this day cannot come until a 'falling away' or rebellion occurs, followed by the revelation of a 'man of sin' (or lawlessness). This figure is described as opposing God and exalting himself within the temple of God. The text claims he is currently being held back by an unnamed restraining force, but upon his eventual revelation, the returning Lord Jesus will destroy him with the breath of his mouth.

Latter-day Saint

In this epistolary section, Paul addresses acute eschatological anxiety among the Thessalonians, correcting a rumor that the 'day of Christ' has already arrived. He outlines specific apocalyptic events that must precede the parousia: a great rebellion or 'falling away' (apostasy) and the revelation of the 'man of sin' or 'lawless one.' Paul notes that a restraining force currently delays this figure's full manifestation, though the 'mystery of iniquity' is already at work. He concludes by thanking God for the Thessalonians' election from the beginning and exhorting them to stand fast in the traditions they were taught.

Jehovah's Witnesses

The apostle Paul addresses the Thessalonians' anxiety, correcting a false rumor that the day of the Lord has already begun. He clarifies that this day must be preceded by a major 'apostasy' (or falling away) and the revelation of a 'man of lawlessness' (or 'man of sin'). This lawless figure opposes God, exalts himself, and metaphorically sits in God's temple. Paul reminds the congregation that this mystery of lawlessness is already at work but is currently being restrained. Once the restraining force is removed, the lawless one will flourish completely until he is exposed and destroyed by the Lord Jesus at his future arrival.

Choix de traduction effectués par la NCB (40)
  • v1: ask — Clear and contemporary English without archaic intensity.
  • v1: coming — Establishes a key thematic English term repeated in verses 8 and 9.
  • v1: Lord — Consistently maps the divine name.
  • v2: neither by... nor by... nor by — Preserves the tripartite negative repetition structure of the source text.
  • v2: claiming that — Accurately expresses the false assertion being circulated.
  • v2: day of the Lord has already come — Follows the stronger critical text for 'Lord' and translates the completed-state verb.
  • v2: spirit — Lowercased to reflect an allegedly prophetic human utterance or spirit rather than the Holy Spirit.
  • v3: no one deceive — Modern, inclusive English phrasing.
  • v3: For that day will not come — Supplies the main clause omitted by ellipsis in the Greek, clarifying the conditional logic.
  • v3: rebellion — Conveys the apocalyptic defection; highly disputed among traditions whether this refers to a literal departure from the church.
  • v3: of lawlessness — Follows 'anomias', favored by critical editions as the harder apocalyptic reading.
  • v3: destruction — Contemporary English that establishes assonance with 'lawlessness' akin to the Greek.
  • v3: the rebellion... the man — Retains the definite article sequence pointing to specific apocalyptic expectations.
  • v4: the one opposing and exalting himself — Preserves the single definite article binding the two participles.
  • v4: God (and god) — Distinguishes the divine name while lowercasing false objects of worship.
  • v4: as God... that he is God — Renders the claim literally, refusing to settle the deep dispute over whether this is a future Antichrist or the historical Papacy.
  • v5: you... you — Preserves the strictly plural address of the pronouns.
  • v5: I used to tell — The imperfect tense indicates customary or repeated past instruction.
  • v6: what is restraining — Renders the neuter participle as a substantive force without identifying it, as disputed among traditions.
  • v7: is at work — Middle voice denoting active, ongoing operation.
  • v7: one who restrains — Reflects the shift to the masculine participle from the neuter in verse 6, leaving identity unresolved as disputed among traditions.
  • v8: Jesus will slay — 'Jesus' is strongly supported textually, and 'slay' conveys decisive apocalyptic judgment.
  • v8: breath — Fits the prophetic imagery (Isa 11:4) of the mouth.
  • v8: appearance — Captures the visible reality of the coming event.
  • v9: The coming of the lawless one — Resolves the relative pronoun into a clear English noun phrase linking back to verse 8.
  • v10: deception — Clear contemporary English noun.
  • v10: so as to be saved — Expresses the purpose or result infinitive clause accurately.
  • v11: working of delusion — Captures both the active 'working' (echoing v. 9) and the deception.
  • v11: sends — Accurately reflects the present tense of the Greek verb.
  • v11: And for this reason God sends them — Translates the direct action without resolving the dispute over whether this implies active reprobation or passive withdrawal of grace.
  • v12: took pleasure — Active, natural English rendering of the participle.
  • v12: did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in unrighteousness — Maintains the balanced chiastic contrast of the Greek clauses.
  • v13: as firstfruits — Strong textual support aligns with Pauline usage as noted in the academic reading, though leaving the soteriological debate intact.
  • v13: Spirit — Capitalized to reflect the divine agent of sanctification in Pauline theology.
  • v14: to which... for the obtaining — Maintains the structural repetition of the 'eis' prepositions.
  • v15: So then — Accurately reflects the dual inferential particles.
  • v15: traditions — Retains the literal term, leaving unresolved the deep dispute among traditions regarding the scope of apostolic authority.
  • v16: comfort — Establishes the noun cognate to the verb in verse 17.
  • v17: comfort... establish — Preserves the cognate wordplay with the noun in verse 16.
  • v17: work and word — Follows the original Greek word order, recalling the thematic use of 'word' from verses 2 and 15.
Limites à connaître
  • This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
  • The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
  • The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
  • The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
  • One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
  • The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
  • Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
  • The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.

Voir la démarche complète étape par étape → · Généré par l’IA le Oct 21, 2026, gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)