ManyBibles

← Voltar para 1 Coríntios 6 · Página completa de estudo de 1 Coríntios 6

Como o consenso para 1 Coríntios 6 foi construído

Cada passo do processo, exatamente como foi executado. Nada aqui é editado manualmente: as traduções vieram do banco de dados deste aplicativo, a leitura de cada tradição foi gerada em chamadas isoladas que não veem umas às outras (o isolamento evita a ancoragem; não as torna testemunhas independentes), e o consenso foi sintetizado apenas a partir dessas leituras.

Modelo:
gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)
Gerado:
Oct 11, 2026, 11:35 PM UTC
Method:
claim-audited, source-language-based, family-weighted
Auditoria de consistência entre fases: aprovada — fatos de tradução, aritmética de níveis, vocabulário em prosa e justificativas de Escolhas Feitas verificados entre si e com os textos impressos.

Passo 1Ler a passagem em todas as traduções de domínio público

7 translations, fed to every step. The AI-generated NCB is never a source.

WEB · World English Bible

1Dare any of you, having a matter against his neighbor, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints? 2Don’t you know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters? 3Don’t you know that we will judge angels? How much more, things that pertain to this life? 4If then you have to judge things pertaining to this life, do you set them to judge who are of no account in the assembly? 5I say this to move you to shame. Isn’t there even one wise man among you who would be able to decide between his brothers? 6But brother goes to law with brother, and that before unbelievers! 7Therefore it is already altogether a defect in you that you have lawsuits one with another. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be defrauded? 8No, but you yourselves do wrong and defraud, and that against your brothers. 9Or don’t you know that the unrighteous will not inherit God’s Kingdom? Don’t be deceived. Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor male prostitutes, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor slanderers, nor extortionists, will inherit God’s Kingdom. 11Some of you were such, but you were washed. You were sanctified. You were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and in the Spirit of our God. 12“All things are lawful for me,” but not all things are expedient. “All things are lawful for me,” but I will not be brought under the power of anything. 13“Foods for the belly, and the belly for foods,” but God will bring to nothing both it and them. But the body is not for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. 14Now God raised up the Lord, and will also raise us up by his power. 15Don’t you know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a prostitute? May it never be! 16Or don’t you know that he who is joined to a prostitute is one body? For, “The two”, he says, “will become one flesh.” 17But he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit. 18Flee sexual immorality! “Every sin that a man does is outside the body,” but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. 19Or don’t you know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, 20for you were bought with a price. Therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s.

KJV · King James Version

1Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? 2Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? 3Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life? 4If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church. 5I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren? 6But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers. 7Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another. Why do ye not rather take wrong? why do ye not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded? 8Nay, ye do wrong, and defraud, and that your brethren. 9Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. 12All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. 13Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God shall destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body. 14And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power. 15Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid. 16What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh. 17But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit. 18Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. 19What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? 20For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.

ASV · American Standard Version

1Dare any of you, having a matter against his neighbor, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints? 2Or know ye not that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world is judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? 3Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more, things that pertain to this life? 4If then ye have to judge things pertaining to this life, do ye set them to judge who are of no account in the church? 5I say this to move you to shame. What, cannot there be found among you one wise man who shall be able to decide between his brethren, 6but brother goeth to law with brother, and that before unbelievers? 7Nay, already it is altogether a defect in you, that ye have lawsuits one with another. Why not rather take wrong? why not rather be defrauded? 8Nay, but ye yourselves do wrong, and defraud, and that your brethren. 9Or know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with men, 10nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11And such were some of you: but ye were washed, but ye were sanctified, but ye were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God. 12All things are lawful for me; but not all things are expedient. All things are lawful for me; but I will not be brought under the power of any. 13Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God shall bring to nought both it and them. But the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body: 14and God both raised the Lord, and will raise up us through his power. 15Know ye not that your bodies are members of Christ? shall I then take away the members of Christ, and make them members of a harlot? God forbid. 16Or know ye not that he that is joined to a harlot is one body? for, The twain, saith he, shall become one flesh. 17But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit. 18Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. 19Or know ye not that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit which is in you, which ye have from God? and ye are not your own; 20for ye were bought with a price: glorify God therefore in your body.

YLT · Young's Literal Translation

1Dare any one of you, having a matter with the other, go to be judged before the unrighteous, and not before the saints? 2have ye not known that the saints shall judge the world? and if by you the world is judged, are ye unworthy of the smaller judgments? 3have ye not known that we shall judge messengers? why not then the things of life? 4of the things of life, indeed, then, if ye may have judgment, those despised in the assembly--these cause ye to sit; 5unto your shame I speak: so there is not among you one wise man, not even one, who shall be able to discern in the midst of his brethren! 6but brother with brother doth go to be judged, and this before unbelievers! 7Already, indeed, then, there is altogether a fault among you, that ye have judgments with one another; wherefore do ye not rather suffer injustice? wherefore be ye not rather defrauded? 8but ye--ye do injustice, and ye defraud, and these--brethren! 9have ye not known that the unrighteous the reign of God shall not inherit? be not led astray; neither whoremongers, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor sodomites, 10nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, the reign of God shall inherit. 11And certain of you were these! but ye were washed, but ye were sanctified, but ye were declared righteous, in the name of the Lord Jesus, and in the Spirit of our God. 12All things are lawful to me, but all things are not profitable; all things are lawful to me, but I--I will not be under authority by any; 13the meats <FI>are<Fi> for the belly, and the belly for the meats. And God both this and these shall make useless; and the body <FI>is<Fi> not for whoredom, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body; 14and God both the Lord did raise, and us will raise up through His power. 15Have ye not known that your bodies are members of Christ? having taken, then, the members of the Christ, shall I make <FI>them<Fi> members of an harlot? let it be not! 16have ye not known that he who is joined to the harlot is one body? `for they shall be--saith He--the two for one flesh.' 17And he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit; 18flee the whoredom; every sin--whatever a man may commit--is without the body, and he who is committing whoredom, against his own body doth sin. 19Have ye not known that your body is a sanctuary of the Holy Spirit in you, which ye have from God? and ye are not your own, 20for ye were bought with a price; glorify, then, God in your body and in your spirit, which are God's.

Darby · Darby Translation

1Dare any one of you, having a matter against another, prosecute his suit before the unjust, and not before the saints? 2Do ye not then know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world is judged by you, are ye unworthy of [the] smallest judgments? 3Do ye not know that we shall judge angels? and not then matters of this life? 4If then ye have judgments as to things of this life, set those [to judge] who are little esteemed in the assembly. 5I speak to you [to put you] to shame. Thus there is not a wise person among you, not even one, who shall be able to decide between his brethren! 6But brother prosecutes his suit with brother, and that before unbelievers. 7Already indeed then it is altogether a fault in you that ye have suits between yourselves. Why do ye not rather suffer wrong? why are ye not rather defrauded? 8But ye do wrong, and defraud, and this [your] brethren. 9Do ye not know that unrighteous [persons] shall not inherit [the] kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor those who make women of themselves, nor who abuse themselves with men, 10nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor abusive persons, nor [the] rapacious, shall inherit [the] kingdom of God. 11And these things were some of you; but ye have been washed, but ye have been sanctified, but ye have been justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. 12All things are lawful to me, but all things do not profit; all things are lawful to me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. 13Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats; but God will bring to nothing both it and them: but the body [is] not for fornication, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. 14And God has both raised up the Lord, and will raise us up from among [the dead] by his power. 15Do ye not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then, taking the members of the Christ, make [them] members of a harlot? Far be the thought. 16Do ye not know that he [that is] joined to the harlot is one body? for the two, he says, shall be one flesh. 17But he that [is] joined to the Lord is one Spirit. 18Flee fornication. Every sin which a man may practise is without the body, but he that commits fornication sins against his own body. 19Do ye not know that your body is [the] temple of the Holy Spirit which [is] in you, which ye have of God; and ye are not your own? 20for ye have been bought with a price: glorify now then God in your body.

Webster · Webster Bible

1Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? 2Do ye not know that the saints will judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? 3Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more, things that pertain to this life? 4If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church. 5I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that will be able to judge between his brethren? 6But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before unbelievers. 7Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another. Why do ye not rather take wrong? why do ye not rather [suffer yourselves to] be defrauded? 8But ye do wrong, and defraud, and that [your] brethren. 9Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. 12All things are lawful to me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. 13Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God will destroy both it and them. Now the body [is] not for lewdness, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body. 14And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power. 15Know ye not, that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make [them] the members of a harlot? By no means. 16What? know ye not that he who is joined to a harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh. 17But he that is joined to the Lord is one spirit. 18Flee lewdness. Every sin that a man doeth, is without the body; but he that committeth lewdness, sinneth against his own body. 19What, know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit [which is] in you, which ye have from God, and ye are not your own? 20For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.

DRC · Douay-Rheims (Challoner)

1Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to be judged before the unjust, and not before the saints? 2Know you not that the saints shall judge this world? And if the world shall be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters? 3Know you not that we shall judge angels? how much more things of this world? 4If therefore you have judgments of things pertaining to this world, set them to judge, who are the most despised in the church. 5I speak to your shame. Is it so that there is not among you any one wise man, that is able to judge between his brethren? 6But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before unbelievers. 7Already indeed there is plainly a fault among you, that you have lawsuits one with another. Why do you not rather take wrong? Why do you not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded? 8But you do wrong and defraud, and that to your brethren. 9Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, 10Nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God. 11And such some of you were; but you are washed, but you are sanctified, but you are justified in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the Spirit of our God. 12All things are lawful to me, but all things are not expedient. All things are lawful to me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. 13Meat for the belly, and the belly for the meats; but God shall destroy both it and them: but the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body. 14Now God hath both raised up the Lord, and will raise us up also by his power. 15Know you not that your bodies are the members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid. 16Or know you not, that he who is joined to a harlot, is made one body? For they shall be, saith he, two in one flesh. 17But he who is joined to the Lord, is one spirit. 18Fly fornication. Every sin that a man doth, is without the body; but he that committeth fornication, sinneth against his own body. 19Or know you not, that your members are the temple of the Holy Ghost, who is in you, whom you have from God; and you are not your own? 20For you are bought with a great price. Glorify and bear God in your body.

Passo 2Each eligible tradition reads the chapter — 12 voting profiles across 3 families

Perfis gerados por IA isolados que não veem uns aos outros. Cientes do gênero literário e honestos sobre material escasso.

Ancient Communions · The undivided-church and pre-Reformation episcopal traditions.

Catholicaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Roman Catholic tradition drawing on both Latin AND Eastern Catholic sources — and actually showing the Eastern dimension, not merely promising it: Scripture within Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium (the Catechism, the Latin Fathers, Augustine, Aquinas and the scholastics, the councils) together with the Eastern Catholic churches in communion with Rome and the Greek and Syriac Fathers they share. Sacramental and typological reading. Distinguish teaching shared across the whole Catholic communion from emphases specific to the Latin or to the Eastern Catholic churches.

Significado imediato — Paul severely rebukes the Corinthian believers on two fronts: first, for bringing internal disputes before pagan courts, ignoring their eschatological destiny to judge the world and angels; second, for tolerating libertine sexual behavior under the slogan 'all things are lawful.' He warns that specific grave sins exclude one from God's kingdom, but reminds them they have been fundamentally transformed—'washed, sanctified, justified.' He distinguishes food, which is transient, from the body, which is destined for resurrection. He argues that sexual immorality is uniquely destructive because the believer's body is physically united to Christ as a member and serves as a temple of the indwelling Holy Spirit, having been purchased by God.

Reception — Catholic reception relies heavily on this chapter for foundational doctrines regarding justification, moral theology, and Christian anthropology. Verse 11 stands as a primary prooftext for the Catholic understanding of justification. The Council of Trent's 'Decree on Justification' insists that the 'washing, sanctifying, and justifying' in the name of Christ and the Spirit describes a simultaneous, ontological renewal of the soul occurring in Baptism, explicitly rejecting the notion of a merely forensic or imputed righteousness. John Chrysostom ('Homilies on 1 Corinthians') emphasizes this same reality, noting the profound grace that completely transforms the believer from a state of impurity to radiant holiness. Verses 9-10 form a classic catalogue of grave sins. The 'Catechism of the Catholic Church' draws on this list to teach that these acts involve grave matter and, when committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent, destroy charity and exclude one from the Kingdom of God. The anthropological teachings in verses 13-20 are equally central. Thomas Aquinas ('Commentary on 1 Corinthians') explains that saints will 'judge the world and angels' not by pronouncing new laws, but by a shared participation in Christ's judicial truth. Regarding the body, Pope John Paul II's 'Man and Woman He Created Them' relies extensively on Paul's teaching that the body is a 'temple of the Holy Spirit.' He argues that sexual immorality (fornication) is not merely a rule broken but a profound sacrilege against the spousal meaning of the body, tearing members away from Christ to join them to a harlot.

Application — The tradition applies this chapter most visibly in its sacramental and ascetic disciplines. Because the sins of verses 9-10 exclude one from the kingdom, Catholic practice mandates that anyone conscious of having committed them must receive absolution in the Sacrament of Penance before approaching the Eucharist. The command to 'glorify God in your body' (v. 20) anchors the ascetic practices of both Latin and Eastern Catholic monastics and laity; fasting, bodily mortification, and the observance of chastity according to one's state in life are embraced as means to consecrate and safeguard the physical temple of the Holy Spirit. Furthermore, Paul's rebuke of public secular lawsuits among believers (vs. 1-6) historically informed the development of internal canonical tribunals to resolve disputes without causing scandal to the outside world.

Autoridades citadas:Council of Trent — Decree on Justification · John Chrysostom — Homilies on 1 Corinthians · Catechism of the Catholic Church — Catechism of the Catholic Church · Thomas Aquinas — Commentary on 1 Corinthians · Pope John Paul II — Man and Woman He Created Them

auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
  • ✓ The washing, sanctifying, and justifying of believers refers to the ontological
  • ✓ The saints' future judgment of the world involves sharing in Christ's judicial p
  • ✓ The sins listed in the chapter objectively constitute grave matter, which exclud
  • ✓ Sexual immorality is uniquely destructive because it sacrilegiously tears the be
Eastern Orthodoxaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Eastern Orthodox tradition: Scripture within Holy Tradition and the consensus of the Fathers (patristic consensus). Emphases on theosis, the liturgy, the Septuagint text, apophatic mystery over precise definition, and the seven Ecumenical Councils.

Significado imediato — Paul rebukes the Corinthian believers for two major failures of community and ethics: bringing lawsuits against one another in pagan secular courts (verses 1-8), and excusing sexual immorality under a distorted theology of Christian liberty (verses 12-20). He corrects their behavior by reminding them of their eschatological destiny to judge the world and angels, their profound transformation through baptism (verse 11), and the eschatological and somatic reality of their union with Christ. The chapter climaxes with the declaration that the human body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, purchased by God and destined for resurrection.

Reception — The Eastern Orthodox tradition reads this chapter as a foundational text for its theology of the body, baptismal regeneration, and pneumatology. John Chrysostom, in his 'Homilies on First Corinthians', emphasizes the ascetic mandate in verses 7-8, teaching that to suffer wrong and be defrauded voluntarily is a mark of true Christian philosophy and an imitation of Christ's kenosis (self-emptying). Verse 11 is universally received as a description of the Mysteries of Initiation (Baptism and Chrismation); the Orthodox tradition understands 'washed,' 'sanctified,' and 'justified' not merely as forensic declarations, but as real, ontological transformations effected by the Holy Spirit. Basil the Great famously draws upon verse 19 in 'On the Holy Spirit' to defend the full divinity and consubstantiality of the Spirit, arguing that because a temple is a dwelling place proper only to God, the Spirit who inhabits the believer must be fully divine. Furthermore, the anti-dualist affirmation of the physical body (verses 13-20) is central to the Orthodox doctrine of theosis. Symeon the New Theologian, in his 'Discourses', strongly emphasizes the visceral, mystical reality of verse 15, asserting that believers' physical bodies genuinely become members of the resurrected Christ, making bodily purity a necessity of maintaining this divine union.

Application — The command to 'glorify God in your body' (verse 20) deeply informs the somatic nature of Orthodox worship and ascetic practice. Fasting, prostrations, standing during the Liturgy, and making the sign of the cross are not viewed as punishments for the flesh, but as ways to engage the body as a sanctified vessel and temple of the Holy Spirit. The baptismal formula of verse 11 is echoed in the prayers of the Orthodox sacrament of Baptism, where the newly illumined are explicitly told they have been washed, sanctified, and justified. In monastic and parish life alike, Paul's instruction to accept being wronged (verse 7) is practically applied as a core ascetic discipline for uprooting pride and cultivating humility.

Autoridades citadas:John Chrysostom — Homilies on First Corinthians · Basil the Great — On the Holy Spirit · Symeon the New Theologian — Discourses

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
  • ✓ Enduring injustice and being defrauded is preferable to taking a brother to cour
  • ✓ The washing, sanctifying, and justifying of believers refer to the real, ontolog
  • ✓ The Holy Spirit is fully divine, evidenced by the fact that the believer's body
  • ✓ Believers' bodies are actual members of Christ, making sins of the flesh a desec
  • ✓ Orthodox ascetic disciplines, such as fasting and prostrations, are concrete way
Oriental Orthodoxaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Oriental Orthodox tradition (Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac): Scripture within the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils and the miaphysite Fathers (Athanasius, Cyril of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch). Deeply liturgical, ascetic, and typological reading; some of these churches hold wider canons.

Significado imediato — In this chapter, Paul addresses two major moral failures in the Corinthian church. First, he sharply rebukes them for taking civil disputes against fellow believers to pagan secular courts, arguing that the saints, who will judge the world and angels, should be able to arbitrate internal matters (verses 1-8). Second, he warns that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God, reminding the Corinthians that they have been washed, sanctified, and justified from their past sins (verses 9-11). Paul then counters a local libertine slogan ('all things are lawful') by addressing sexual immorality. He insists that the body is not for fornication but for the Lord, and that believers' bodies are members of Christ and temples of the indwelling Holy Spirit, having been bought with a price (verses 12-20).

Reception — The Oriental Orthodox tradition reads this chapter profoundly through its Christological, sacramental, and ascetic commitments, viewing the human body not as a mere shell, but as a vital, integrated participant in salvation. Saint Cyril of Alexandria frequently appeals to Paul’s declaration that believers’ bodies are 'members of Christ' (verse 15) and that whoever is joined to the Lord is 'one spirit' (verse 17). For Cyril, this undergirds the reality of the believer's union with Christ; because the Word became flesh, Christians are physically and spiritually grafted into Him through the Eucharist, which demands that the physical body be kept holy. This high view of the physical body fueled the strict asceticism of the Coptic and Syriac monastic traditions. Shenoute of Atripe drew heavily on the warning that the body is a 'temple of the Holy Spirit' (verse 19) to enforce absolute chastity and bodily discipline among his monastic federation. He treated sexual immorality not merely as an ethical lapse, but as an ontological desecration of a divine sanctuary (verses 18-19). Furthermore, the declaration that the Corinthians were 'washed,' 'sanctified,' and 'justified' (verse 11) is universally received as a description of the mysteries of Baptism and Myron (Chrismation). Severus of Antioch emphasizes that this sacramental washing fundamentally alters the believer's constitution, relocating them from the realm of the unrighteous (verses 9-10) into the kingdom of God by the power of the Spirit.

Application — Liturgically, the tradition applies this chapter’s theology of the body through intense physical participation in worship. Because the body itself must 'glorify God' (verse 20) and is destined for resurrection (verse 14), ascetic practices such as prostrations (metanoias), rigorous fasting, and standing for long hours are seen as the proper maintenance of the Spirit's temple. The rites of Holy Baptism in the Coptic, Syriac, and Armenian churches echo verse 11, praying that the newly baptized remain pure sanctuaries for the Lord. Practically, Paul's injunction against suing believers in secular courts (verses 1-8) shaped the historical development of communal canonical courts (such as the traditional Coptic Majlis Milli), where the church seeks to mediate civil and family disputes internally to avoid public scandal before unbelievers and to govern the community by spiritual wisdom.

Autoridades citadas:Cyril of Alexandria — Commentary on John · Shenoute of Atripe — Discourses · Severus of Antioch — Cathedral Homilies

auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
  • ✓ Paul's rebuke of lawsuits among believers established a lasting historical prefe
  • ✓ The washing, sanctification, and justification of believers is understood sacram
  • ✓ Believers' bodies being members of Christ demonstrates a real, physical, and spi
  • ✓ The designation of the body as a temple of the Holy Spirit serves as a foundatio

Reformation Traditions · The magisterial churches of the sixteenth-century Reformation.

Anglican / Episcopalaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Anglican tradition (including the Episcopal Church): Scripture read with tradition and reason (Hooker); the Book of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles; a comprehensiveness spanning evangelical, anglo-catholic, and broad/progressive readings — name that spectrum where the passage has been read across it.

Significado imediato — In this epistle chapter, Paul addresses two specific moral and communal crises in the Corinthian church. First, he rebukes believers for taking lawsuits against one another to pagan secular courts, arguing that those destined to judge angels should be able to mediate internal disputes, and asserting that it is better to suffer wrong than to defraud a brother (verses 1-8). Second, he confronts a distortion of Christian liberty ('all things are lawful') that some used to justify visiting prostitutes. To correct this, Paul provides a vice list of behaviors that exclude individuals from the kingdom of God, reminds the Corinthians that they have been washed and justified, and insists that the believer's body is not meant for sexual immorality but is a temple of the Holy Spirit, purchased by God (verses 9-20).

Reception — Within the Anglican tradition, 1 Corinthians 6 has been read through the lenses of sacramental theology, justification, and highly polarized contemporary debates over sexual ethics. Richard Hooker turned to verse 11 ('washed... sanctified... justified') to articulate the classic reformed Anglican distinction between the imputed righteousness of justification and the infused righteousness of sanctification, while maintaining their inseparable reception in the believer. In contemporary reception, verses 9-10 form a primary battleground in the Anglican Communion's comprehensive spectrum regarding human sexuality. Conservative evangelicals and the Global South (GAFCON) read the terms 'effeminate' and 'abusers of themselves with mankind' (often translating the Greek 'arsenokoitai' and 'malakoi') as clear, abiding scriptural prohibitions against all same-sex sexual relationships, affirming this as the plain, historic teaching of the church. Conversely, progressive and broad church voices within the Episcopal Church and other western provinces rely on historical-critical reason to argue that these terms refer to exploitative, unequal Roman practices (such as pederasty or prostitution), and thus do not condemn faithful, covenanted same-sex unions. Anglo-Catholic theology has drawn heavily on verses 13-20, viewing the assertion that the body is 'for the Lord' and a 'temple of the Holy Spirit' as foundational to a deeply incarnational and sacramental view of human materiality.

Application — The tradition applies verse 11 to its theology of Holy Baptism, where the spiritual reality of being 'washed' and 'sanctified' is sacramentally conferred. The pastoral application of verses 1-8 has historically informed the development of internal ecclesiastical courts and canon law, meant to handle church disputes without bringing the church into disrepute in civil spaces. Finally, verse 20 ('glorify God in your body') conceptually undergirds the classic Prayer of Oblation in the Book of Common Prayer's Eucharist, where communicants present themselves, their 'souls and bodies, to be a reasonable, holy, and living sacrifice' to God.

Autoridades citadas:Richard Hooker — A Learned Discourse of Justification · John Stott — Issues Facing Christians Today · L. William Countryman — Dirt, Greed, and Sex · Thomas Cranmer — The Book of Common Prayer

auditoria em nível de alegação (7 verificações)
  • ✓ Internal disputes among Christians should be settled within the church rather th
  • ✓ The physical body is not meant for sexual immorality but is intended for the Lor
  • ✓ Verse 11 supports the distinction between the external imputation of righteousne
  • ✓ Conservative Anglican traditions read the vice list as an enduring moral absolut
  • ✓ Progressive Anglican theologians argue the vice list specifically condemns histo
  • ✓ The call to remember one's body was 'bought with a price' informs the Anglican E
  • ✓ The sequence of being 'washed' and 'sanctified' in the Spirit is applied directl
Lutheranaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Lutheran tradition (the Book of Concord): the law–gospel distinction, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura held with the ecumenical creeds, the theology of the cross, and sacramental realism.

Significado imediato — Paul addresses the ethical and communal failures of the Corinthian assembly, specifically their tendency to litigate against one another in pagan courts (1 Corinthians 6:1-8) and their tolerance of sexual immorality (1 Corinthians 6:13-20). He contrasts their former unrighteous behaviors—which exclude individuals from God's kingdom (1 Corinthians 6:9-10)—with their new reality in Christ, having been washed, sanctified, and justified (1 Corinthians 6:11). He also corrects a distortion of Christian liberty, arguing that bodily actions matter profoundly because believers' bodies are members of Christ and temples of the Holy Spirit, having been bought with a price (1 Corinthians 6:12-20).

Reception — The Lutheran tradition receives this chapter as a classic text for the distinction between Law and Gospel, as well as a strong defense of sacramental realism. Verses 9-10 function as the strict Law, identifying sins that exclude one from the kingdom and crushing human self-righteousness. In immediate contrast, verse 11 stands as pure Gospel. Melanchthon, in the *Apology of the Augsburg Confession*, appeals to verse 11 to argue that justification is a gift received apart from works, anchored solely 'in the name of the Lord Jesus.' Furthermore, the tradition explicitly identifies the 'washing' of verse 11 with the sacrament of Holy Baptism. Luther's *Large Catechism* emphasizes that this washing is not merely a symbolic ritual but a means of grace that actually delivers the sanctification and justification it signifies. Regarding verse 12 ('All things are lawful'), Luther engages this concept in *On the Freedom of a Christian*, explaining that while faith makes a Christian perfectly free from the Law for salvation, the Christian freely subjects the body to discipline to avoid being mastered by the flesh and to serve the neighbor.

Application — Pastors and theologians in this tradition apply this chapter by calling believers to a daily return to their Baptism. When confronted by the crushing weight of the Law in verses 9-10, the pastoral response is to point the penitent to the objective promise of verse 11: they have already been washed and justified in Christ's name. In matters of Christian ethics, the tradition urges believers to endure being wronged rather than defrauding a brother (1 Corinthians 6:7) and to flee sexual immorality (1 Corinthians 6:18). This ethical life is never pursued to earn salvation, but flows spontaneously from the reality that the believer's body is a temple of the Holy Spirit and belongs to a crucified and risen Lord who bought them with a price (1 Corinthians 6:19-20).

Autoridades citadas:Philipp Melanchthon — Apology of the Augsburg Confession · Martin Luther — Large Catechism · Martin Luther — On the Freedom of a Christian

auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
  • ✓ Paul confronts the Corinthian church's ethical failures, including pagan lawsuit
  • ✓ Verses 9-10 function as the strict Law that crushes self-righteousness, while ve
  • ✓ The 'washing' of verse 11 is understood sacramentally as Holy Baptism, which is
  • ✓ The assertion that 'all things are lawful' reflects the inner freedom of faith,
  • ✓ Believers are counseled to daily return to the objective promise of their baptis
  • ✓ Christian ethics, such as fleeing immorality and enduring wrongs, are pursued no
Reformed / Presbyterianaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Reformed tradition (Calvin; the Westminster Standards; the Heidelberg and Belgic confessions): the sovereignty of God and covenant theology, a redemptive-historical reading of Scripture, and the regulative principle.

Significado imediato — In 1 Corinthians 6, Paul addresses severe ethical and communal breakdowns in the Corinthian church. First, he rebukes believers for taking internal disputes before pagan civil magistrates rather than resolving them within the church, reminding them of their eschatological destiny to judge the world and angels (vv. 1-8). Second, he issues a stark warning that the persistently unrighteous will not inherit God's kingdom (vv. 9-10). Paul contrasts this past reality with the believers' present status, declaring them washed, sanctified, and justified (v. 11). Finally, he dismantles the antinomian slogan 'all things are lawful' by establishing a theology of the body. Because believers' bodies are members of Christ (v. 15) and temples of the Holy Spirit (v. 19), they must flee sexual immorality and glorify God, having been bought with a price (v. 20).

Reception — The Reformed tradition reads this chapter as a profound exposition of union with Christ, the inseparable graces of salvation, and the comprehensive scope of Christ's lordship. Regarding the prohibition on lawsuits (vv. 1-8), John Calvin's 'Commentary on the Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians' argues that Paul does not condemn the civil magistracy itself, but rather the vindictive spirit of the Corinthians and the public scandal of believers failing to judge disputes with mutual equity. Verse 11 serves as a crucial proof text for Reformed soteriology. The Westminster Divines in the 'Westminster Confession of Faith' utilize it to demonstrate that while justification and sanctification are distinct acts of God, they are inseparably bound together in the believer by the Spirit. Furthermore, 20th-century theologian John Murray, in 'Redemption Accomplished and Applied', identifies verse 11 as a primary text for definitive sanctification, representing the decisive, once-for-all breach with the kingdom of sin that grounds all progressive holiness. Finally, verses 19-20 provide the theological heartbeat of Reformed experiential piety. The 'Heidelberg Catechism' draws directly on these verses to assert that the believer's greatest comfort is that they belong, body and soul, to their faithful Savior Jesus Christ, who has bought them with a price.

Application — The Reformed tradition applies this chapter corporately and individually. Corporately, verses 1-8 undergird the establishment of church courts, such as sessions and presbyteries, to adjudicate disputes and exercise church discipline, thereby protecting the church's witness from public scandal. Individually, verses 19-20 are regularly invoked in pastoral counseling and preaching to call believers to comprehensive bodily holiness and sexual purity. Believers are taught that their bodies are not their own to use as they please, nor are they left to their own devices; rather, they are the treasured possession of Christ and the dwelling place of the Holy Spirit, which provides profound existential comfort.

Autoridades citadas:John Calvin — Commentary on the Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians · Westminster Divines — Westminster Confession of Faith · John Murray — Redemption Accomplished and Applied · Zacharias Ursinus — Heidelberg Catechism

auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
  • ✓ Believers are forbidden from bringing internal disputes before unbelieving judge
  • ✓ Paul's prohibition on lawsuits does not invalidate the civil magistracy but cond
  • ✓ Justification and sanctification are distinct but inseparable graces bestowed up
  • ✓ Believers experience a definitive sanctification, marking a decisive break from
  • ✓ The believer's greatest comfort and the basis for bodily holiness is that they a
  • ✓ The church must maintain its own internal courts and disciplinary processes to r

Free-Church & Revival Traditions · Believers'-church, revival, and restorationist movements.

Baptistaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Baptist tradition (e.g. the 1689 Second London Confession, the Baptist Faith & Message — note the range): believers' baptism, congregational polity, liberty of conscience, a memorial reading of the ordinances, and strong emphasis on personal conversion and biblical authority.

Significado imediato — In this chapter, Paul rebukes the Corinthian church for failing to handle internal disputes, specifically the practice of believers suing one another in secular pagan courts (vv. 1-8). He argues that since the saints will judge the world and angels, they are more than competent to resolve trivial earthly matters. Paul then provides a stark list of behaviors characteristic of the unrighteous who will not inherit the kingdom of God (vv. 9-10). He contrasts this with the believers' new reality, declaring that though they once practiced such things, they have now been washed, sanctified, and justified (v. 11). Finally, Paul addresses sexual immorality and antinomian slogans, arguing that the believer's body is united with Christ, is a temple of the Holy Spirit, and was bought with a price, necessitating bodily glorification of God rather than participation in sexual sin (vv. 12-20).

Reception — The Baptist tradition heavily utilizes 1 Corinthians 6 in articulating its doctrines of congregational polity, regenerate church membership, and personal conversion. Verses 1-8 are foundational for Baptist congregationalism; John Gill, in his 'Exposition of the New Testament', emphasizes that the local church possesses the inherent authority and wisdom to judge its own internal matters without recourse to secular magistrates, a reading that reinforced early Baptist commitments to the separation of church and state. Verses 9-11 form a central pillar in Baptist soteriology, frequently cited in the Second London Confession of 1689 to demonstrate the definitive break from the dominion of sin through effectual calling, justification, and sanctification. The phrase 'such were some of you' (v. 11) is heralded as the paradigm of personal conversion. Furthermore, consistent with a memorial view of the ordinances, Baptist theologians like A.H. Strong ('Systematic Theology') read the 'washing' in verse 11 not as a reference to the physical waters of baptism (baptismal regeneration), but as the spiritual cleansing of regeneration by the Holy Spirit, of which water baptism is merely the outward symbol. Finally, verses 19-20 undergird a strong tradition of personal piety, framing the believer's body as exclusively Christ's purchased possession.

Application — Baptist application of this chapter operates strongly in church discipline, evangelism, and personal ethics. First, congregations apply verses 1-8 by formally mediating disputes between members—whether relational or financial—through church leadership or congregational meetings, explicitly discouraging believers from suing one another in civil courts. Second, verse 11 is a staple in evangelistic preaching and personal testimony; pastors invoke 'and such were some of you' to offer hope that no individual is beyond the saving, transformative grace of Christ, regardless of their past. Third, verses 18-20 are heavily emphasized in youth ministries, premarital counseling, and moral instruction to promote sexual purity and the avoidance of substance abuse, urging believers to 'glorify God in your body' because they are indwelt by the Spirit and purchased by Christ's blood.

Autoridades citadas:John Gill — Exposition of the New Testament · Second London Confession (1689) — Second London Confession · A.H. Strong — Systematic Theology

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
  • ✓ The local congregation has the autonomy and authority to judge internal disputes
  • ✓ The 'washing' of believers is a spiritual regeneration accomplished by the Holy
  • ✓ The phrase 'such were some of you' serves as a primary text for the necessity of
  • ✓ Churches should actively mediate financial and relational disputes between membe
  • ✓ Believers are commanded to maintain sexual purity because their physical bodies
Methodist / Wesleyan / Holinessaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Wesleyan-Holiness tradition: prevenient grace and free response, sanctification and entire sanctification / Christian perfection, the Wesleyan quadrilateral (Scripture primary, with tradition, reason, and experience), and warm-hearted practical piety.

Significado imediato — In 1 Corinthians 6, Paul confronts the Corinthian church on two major ethical failures: internal lawsuits and sexual immorality. He rebukes believers for bringing grievances before secular magistrates rather than resolving them within the community of saints, arguing that it is better to be defrauded than to shame the church's witness (vv. 1-8). He then lists behaviors that exclude one from the kingdom of God, reminding the Corinthians that while they were once defined by these sins, they have been transformed by God's Spirit (vv. 9-11). Finally, Paul addresses a distortion of Christian liberty ('all things are lawful for me'). He argues that unlike food and the stomach, which are temporary, the body is meant for the Lord and bound for resurrection. Because the believer's body is united with Christ and serves as a temple of the Holy Spirit, purchased at a price, sexual immorality is a uniquely severe sin against one's own body, necessitating a life that glorifies God in body and spirit (vv. 12-20).

Reception — The Wesleyan-Holiness tradition receives 1 Corinthians 6 as a vital text for articulating the inseparable link between justification and sanctification, as well as the scriptural basis for Christian perfection. Verse 11 ('but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified') is a foundational locus for Wesleyan soteriology. John Wesley, in his 'Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament', comments on Paul's unusual ordering of these terms (putting sanctification before justification), explaining that Paul is not establishing a chronological sequence but describing the comprehensive, simultaneous work of the Spirit at conversion—where guilt is removed (justification) and the power of sin is broken (initial sanctification). Verses 19-20 form a critical pillar for the doctrine of entire sanctification. If the body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, it must be made entirely holy. Wesley utilizes this imagery in 'A Plain Account of Christian Perfection' to argue for total consecration, insisting that being 'bought with a price' demands the complete surrender of both body and soul to God's reign. Adam Clarke, in his 'Commentary on the Bible', reinforces this by arguing that the indwelling of the Holy Spirit (v. 19) is incompatible with resident sin, requiring a deep moral purity and demonstrating the power of God's grace to cleanse the believer completely.

Application — In Methodist and Holiness communities, 1 Corinthians 6 is applied intensely to personal ethics, bodily stewardship, and practical piety. Verses 19-20 are frequently invoked to promote abstention from physically destructive habits (historically informing the tradition's temperance movements and stances against alcohol and tobacco) and to uphold strict sexual ethics. The believer’s physical body is viewed as a consecrated vessel for the Holy Spirit's ongoing work in the world. Furthermore, believers pray these verses while seeking entire sanctification, asking God to fully cleanse His 'temple' of all inbred sin. On a communal level, verses 1-8 are applied as a mandate for internal church discipline, peace-making, and restorative justice, urging congregations to cultivate a warm-hearted practical piety where believers would rather suffer personal loss than bring disrepute upon the name of Christ before the unbelieving world.

Autoridades citadas:John Wesley — Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament · John Wesley — A Plain Account of Christian Perfection · Adam Clarke — Commentary on the Bible

auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
  • ✓ Paul rebukes the Corinthians for litigating against one another before secular j
  • ✓ Verse 11 is read as a comprehensive summary of salvation, demonstrating that jus
  • ✓ The declaration that the body is the temple of the Holy Spirit provides scriptur
  • ✓ Believers are called to rigorous stewardship of their physical bodies, avoiding
Anabaptist / Mennoniteaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Anabaptist tradition (Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite): a Jesus-centered reading with the Sermon on the Mount as normative, believers' baptism, nonviolence and nonresistance, simple living, communal discernment, and the church as a visible community distinct from worldly power.

Significado imediato — Paul rebukes the Corinthian church for taking internal disputes to secular courts, arguing they should resolve matters internally or willingly suffer loss rather than compromise their witness before unbelievers. He reminds them of their transformed identity, listing vices that exclude people from the kingdom of God but declaring that they have been washed and justified. Finally, he warns against sexual immorality by affirming that the believer's body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, purchased by Christ, and meant entirely for His glory.

Reception — The Anabaptist tradition reads 1 Corinthians 6 as a foundational text for its 'two kingdoms' theology, its ethic of nonresistance, and its ecclesiology of the visible church. Verses 1-8 are historically cited to forbid believers from suing one another or utilizing secular courts, viewing the worldly justice system as reliant on coercion (the sword) and fundamentally distinct from the way of Christ. The Schleitheim Confession establishes that Christians must not engage in worldly judgments, leaning heavily on Paul's mandate to rely on the saints rather than the 'unjust.' Conrad Grebel and the early Swiss Brethren emphasized verse 7 as a mandate for defenselessness; true discipleship involves a willingness to be defrauded rather than retaliating or seeking coercive justice. Verses 9-11 reinforce the Anabaptist commitment to church discipline and the Ban. Menno Simons frequently referenced Paul's vice list to argue that the visible church must be kept pure from unrepentant sin, as those practicing such things have no part in the kingdom. The transition in verse 11 ('such were some of you, but ye are washed') is read as the fruit of believer's baptism—a total, visible break from the old life.

Application — In practice, Anabaptist and Mennonite congregations historically forbid members from initiating lawsuits, insisting that disputes be settled through congregational discernment or mediation. To suffer financial loss or be defrauded (verse 7) is considered spiritually superior to utilizing the coercive legal apparatus of the state. Furthermore, the teaching that the body is a temple 'bought with a price' (verses 19-20) is integrated into the practice of Gelassenheit (yieldedness)—the total surrender of one's physical life, resources, and autonomy to Christ and His gathered body, rejecting both sexual immorality and any participation in worldly violence.

Autoridades citadas:Michael Sattler (attributed) — Schleitheim Confession · Conrad Grebel — Letters to Thomas Muntzer · Menno Simons — Foundation of Christian Doctrine

auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
  • ✓ The prohibition against going to law before the unrighteous establishes the sepa
  • ✓ Believers must willingly suffer injustice and be defrauded rather than engage in
  • ✓ The vice list necessitates the use of church discipline to maintain a pure, visi
  • ✓ The believer's body is entirely yielded to Christ, precluding participation in i
Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal tradition (Assemblies of God, Church of God, and kindred bodies): the present continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine healing, and expectancy of God's present action, read within Nicene Trinitarian faith. Do NOT attribute Word-of-Faith / prosperity or later neo-charismatic distinctives to classical Pentecostalism generally.

Significado imediato — In this chapter, Paul addresses two major moral failures in the Corinthian church: believers bringing lawsuits against one another before pagan judges (vv. 1-8), and believers engaging in sexual immorality (vv. 12-20). He shames them for their legal disputes, reminding them that the saints will judge the world and angels, and suggests it is better to be defrauded than to damage the church's witness. Paul then lists behaviors characteristic of the unrighteous who will not inherit God's kingdom (vv. 9-10), sharply contrasting this with the believers' new reality: they were washed, sanctified, and justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of God (v. 11). Finally, correcting a misunderstanding of Christian liberty ('all things are lawful'), Paul argues against sexual immorality by asserting a high theology of the physical body: it is meant for the Lord, destined for resurrection, joined to Christ, and serves as the very temple of the Holy Spirit, purchased at a price (vv. 13-20).

Reception — Classical Pentecostalism receives 1 Corinthians 6 as a foundational text for its theology of the Holy Spirit's experiential work and its high view of the physical body. Verse 11 is read as a powerful Trinitarian summary of salvation that highlights the transformative, experiential washing and sanctifying power of the Holy Spirit, which permanently breaks the bondage of the sins listed in verses 9-10. Stanley M. Horton notes that this sanctifying work of the Spirit is not merely positional but demands a lived reality of holiness. Furthermore, the tradition heavily emphasizes verses 13 ('the body is... for the Lord, and the Lord for the body') and 19-20 ('your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit... bought with a price'). These verses are central to the classical Pentecostal doctrine of divine healing. F.F. Bosworth and early Pentecostal pioneers argued that because the physical body was purchased by Christ's atonement and is actively indwelt by the Holy Spirit, God has a vested interest in the physical health of His temple. Consequently, the bodily indwelling of the Spirit is viewed not only as a demand for moral purity but as a guarantee of the Spirit's life-giving, physically healing power.

Application — Pentecostals apply this chapter directly in ministries of deliverance, healing, and worship. Verse 11 ('And such were some of you') is frequently invoked during altar calls to assure converts that the Holy Spirit can instantly break deep-seated addictions and past patterns of sin. Verses 19-20 are applied as a strict mandate for personal holiness, historically used to urge believers to abstain from anything that might defile the physical temple, such as alcohol, tobacco, and sexual immorality. Additionally, these same verses are prayed over the sick; believers are encouraged to claim divine healing on the basis that their bodies belong to God and that the Holy Spirit will maintain and restore the physical temple He inhabits. Finally, the command to 'glorify God in your body' (v. 20) is regularly cited to encourage physically demonstrative worship, such as the raising of hands, dancing, and vocal praise in the congregation.

Autoridades citadas:Stanley M. Horton — What the Bible Says About the Holy Spirit · F.F. Bosworth — Christ the Healer

auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
  • ✓ The declaration that believers were washed, sanctified, and justified by the Spi
  • ✓ The physical body is meant for the Lord and serves as the temple of the Holy Spi
  • ✓ Because the body is purchased by God and indwelt by the Spirit, believers must a
  • ✓ The command to glorify God in the body is utilized as scriptural validation for
Seventh-day Adventistaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Seventh-day Adventist tradition: the seventh-day Sabbath, the great-controversy theme, conditional immortality, sanctuary theology, and a historicist reading of prophecy.

Significado imediato — In 1 Corinthians 6, Paul admonishes the Corinthian believers for bringing legal disputes against one another before secular, pagan courts rather than settling them within the church community (verses 1-8). He reminds them of their future eschatological role in judging the world and angels, arguing that this high calling qualifies them to resolve mundane earthly disputes. Paul then lists various unrighteous behaviors and vices that will exclude individuals from inheriting the kingdom of God, reminding the believers that they have been washed, sanctified, and justified from such pasts (verses 9-11). Finally, he addresses the issue of sexual immorality, rejecting the dualistic idea that bodily actions do not matter. He insists that the believer's body is a member of Christ, a temple of the Holy Spirit purchased at a price, and therefore must be used to glorify God rather than be defiled by fornication (verses 12-20).

Reception — Seventh-day Adventist theology has distinctively anchored two major tenets in 1 Corinthians 6. First, verses 2 and 3 ('the saints shall judge the world... judge angels') are foundational to the Adventist understanding of the millennium and the great-controversy theme. Ellen G. White, in *The Great Controversy*, interprets this passage as describing a phase of judgment that occurs during the thousand years (the millennium) following Christ's second coming. During this time, the resurrected saints reside in heaven and participate in a review of the records of the unrepentant wicked and fallen angels. This process is not to determine salvation, which is already settled, but to vindicate the justice and character of God before the entire universe prior to the final executive judgment. Second, verses 19 and 20 ('your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost... bought with a price') form a primary biblical warrant for the Adventist health message. In works such as *The Ministry of Healing*, White teaches a holistic view of human nature where the physical body is intimately connected to spiritual perception. Because the body is God's temple, defiling it with improper diet, alcohol, tobacco, or unhealthy habits impairs the nervous system and diminishes the mind's ability to discern the promptings of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, maintaining physical health is viewed as a sacred, moral obligation rather than a secular matter.

Application — Adventists apply this chapter practically in both church governance and lifestyle. Based on verses 1-8, church members are generally counseled to resolve interpersonal and business disputes within the church community—often utilizing mediation or church discipline—rather than resorting to secular litigation, thereby protecting the church's witness. The imperative to 'glorify God in your body' (verse 20) is a characteristic emphasis lived out globally through the Adventist health message. This application involves advocating for comprehensive health reform, which includes adopting a plant-based diet, observing the biblical distinction between clean and unclean meats, abstaining completely from alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drugs, and practicing preventative health principles (such as adequate rest, exercise, and temperance). For Adventists, physical stewardship is a practical expression of worship and gratitude for the body-temple purchased by Christ's sacrifice.

Autoridades citadas:Ellen G. White — The Great Controversy · Ellen G. White — The Ministry of Healing

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
  • ✓ Paul rebukes the Corinthians for taking legal disputes against fellow believers
  • ✓ The physical body is not meant for sexual immorality but belongs to the Lord, se
  • ✓ The saints will judge the world and fallen angels during the millennial thousand
  • ✓ The designation of the body as the temple of the Holy Spirit makes the care of p
  • ✓ The command to glorify God in the body is practically applied through the Advent
Restorationist / Churches of Christaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Restoration Movement tradition (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches — formally non-creedal): restore New Testament Christianity, 'speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent,' reading by direct command, apostolic example, and necessary inference; baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; the weekly Lord's Supper.

Significado imediato — Paul admonishes the Corinthian church for bringing internal disputes before secular courts rather than resolving them within the community (1 Cor 6:1-8). He provides a vice list of behaviors that exclude individuals from God's Kingdom (1 Cor 6:9-10) and contrasts this with the believers' present state, having been washed, sanctified, and justified (1 Cor 6:11). Finally, Paul corrects the abuse of Christian liberty regarding sexual immorality, teaching that the believer's body is united with Christ, is a temple of the Holy Spirit, and was purchased at a price, thus demanding bodily holiness (1 Cor 6:12-20).

Reception — In the Restoration Movement, 1 Corinthians 6 is a primary text for both soteriology and church discipline. The tradition firmly reads 'you were washed' in verse 11 as a direct reference to water baptism by immersion. Alexander Campbell, in 'The Christian System', utilized this verse to argue that baptism is the instrumental point at which a believer is formally sanctified and justified, marking the boundary between the lifestyle of verses 9-10 and salvation. Regarding verses 1-8, commentators like David Lipscomb in 'A Commentary on the New Testament Epistles' read the text as a binding prohibition against Christians engaging in civil litigation against one another, stressing the autonomy and internal competence of the local congregation. Verse 19, detailing the body as the temple of the Holy Spirit, has been the subject of internal debate regarding whether the Spirit indwells the believer personally or solely through the medium of the Word. Despite this pneumatological debate, the tradition uniformly receives the text as a binding command for strict physical and sexual purity.

Application — APPLICATION: Congregations apply this chapter by heavily emphasizing baptism as the definitive moment of cleansing from past sins, regularly citing verse 11 during evangelistic appeals and gospel meetings. Elders and preachers use verses 1-8 to mediate disputes between members, strongly discouraging and often disciplining those who sue fellow believers in secular courts. Verses 18-20 are applied continuously in teaching on personal holiness, instructing that sexual immorality is a unique sin against the body, and that believers must honor God physically because they were 'bought with a price.'

Autoridades citadas:Alexander Campbell — The Christian System · David Lipscomb — A Commentary on the New Testament Epistles

auditoria em nível de alegação (3 verificações)
  • ✓ The phrase 'you were washed' refers explicitly to water baptism by immersion for
  • ✓ Believers are strictly prohibited from taking civil legal action against fellow
  • ✓ The body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, which mandates strict sexual purity, th

Passo 3Painéis sem direito a voto e apêndice comparativo

Estes fundamentam as notas e a tradução, e são relatados aqui, mas nunca são contabilizados na votação.

Academic textual-historical analysisaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Academic textual-historical analysis: philology and the original-language text, textual criticism, ancient Near Eastern (and, for the NT, Greco-Roman) context, literary genre and form, composition and dating debates, and reception history. Describe scholarly positions and their evidence without confessional commitment. This panel informs the textual notes and the rendering; it is never a church vote.

Significado imediato — The text presents two primary exhortations. In verses 1-8, the author rebukes the Corinthian believers for bringing legal disputes against one another before non-believing judges ('the unrighteous') rather than resolving them internally, reminding them that the saints will judge the world and angels. Verses 9-11 list various vices—including sexual immorality, idolatry, theft, and greed—that preclude inheritance of God's kingdom, contrasting these with the believers' present washed and justified state. In verses 12-20, the text addresses bodily purity, juxtaposing statements about the lawfulness of all things and the biological function of food with the assertion that the body belongs to the Lord. The chapter concludes by prohibiting sexual union with a prostitute (quoting Genesis 2:24) and defining the believer's body as a temple of the Holy Spirit, purchased at a price.

Reception — Scholarly analysis of 1 Corinthians 6 heavily employs socio-historical and rhetorical reconstruction. Regarding the lawsuits (vv. 1-8), historians note that the text itself does not explicitly identify the class of the litigants. However, relying on Roman legal history, scholars such as Bruce Winter (*Seek the Welfare of the City*) reconstruct the socio-economic background, arguing that Roman civil litigation was expensive and inherently biased toward the elite, suggesting that wealthy Corinthian Christians were likely prosecuting poorer believers. In verses 9-10, the Greek terms *malakoi* (literally 'soft') and *arsenokoitai* (a compound likely derived from the Septuagint) are subjects of intense philological debate. Dale B. Martin (*Sex and the Single Savior*) and others argue these terms refer to specific ancient practices—such as effeminacy associated with excess, pederasty, or exploitative prostitution—rather than modern concepts of sexual orientation, whereas other scholars argue for a broader prohibition derived from Levitical codes. In verses 12-13, rhetorical critics like Jerome Murphy-O'Connor (*Keys to First Corinthians*) observe the presence of diatribe, identifying phrases like 'All things are lawful for me' and 'Food for the stomach' as Corinthian slogans which the author quotes before appending his own theological refutations. Text-critical analysis (e.g., Bruce Metzger, *A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament*) notes that the Byzantine addition in verse 20 ('and in your spirit, which are God’s') is absent in the earliest papyri (P46) and majuscules, reflecting a later scribal expansion designed to balance the reference to the body.

Application — In academic application, this chapter is a standard pedagogical text for teaching epistolary rhetorical analysis, specifically the methodology of 'mirroring'—reconstructing an opposing community's views from an author's polemical responses (vv. 12-13). Furthermore, the vice list in verses 9-10 is a central text in modern hermeneutical debates regarding translation ethics, gender studies, and the complexities of applying ancient Mediterranean socio-sexual constructs to contemporary language.

Autoridades citadas:Bruce Winter — Seek the Welfare of the City · Dale B. Martin — Sex and the Single Savior · Jerome Murphy-O'Connor — Keys to First Corinthians · Bruce Metzger — A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament

auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
  • ✓ The text explicitly rebukes the Corinthians for bringing disputes before non-bel
  • ✓ Scholars reconstruct the background of the lawsuits using Roman legal history, a
  • ✓ The translation of the Greek terms malakoi and arsenokoitai is intensely debated
  • ✓ Phrases such as 'All things are lawful for me' are widely identified by form cri
  • ✓ The Byzantine addition to the end of the chapter concerning the spirit is identi
  • ✓ The chapter is used in academic pedagogy to teach rhetorical mirroring and to ex
Jewish interpretationaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Jewish interpretation of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible books only; do not treat the New Testament as Scripture, and address it only historically if at all). Distinguish rabbinic (Talmud, Midrash), medieval (Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and the classical mefarshim), and modern (including critical and denominational) voices rather than presenting one uniform Jewish position. This panel informs, and is reported, but never a Christian church vote.

Significado imediato — In the immediate setting of the chapter, a first-century Jewish teacher instructs a mixed diaspora community on internal dispute resolution and sexual ethics. The text mandates that civil disputes be settled internally 'before the saints' rather than before 'the unrighteous' or secular civic courts (verses 1-6). It then provides a vice list detailing behaviors that exclude individuals from the kingdom of God (verses 9-10), reflecting standard Second Temple Jewish polemics against pagan immorality. Finally, the chapter addresses sexual ethics by deploying a direct citation of Genesis 2:24 (verse 16) to argue against utilizing prostitutes, framing the human body as a sacred space or sanctuary (verse 19) that must remain ritually and morally pure.

Reception — Judaism does not recognize 1 Corinthians, or any of the New Testament, as Scripture; therefore, this chapter holds no canonical, theological, or Halakhic authority within the Jewish tradition. However, modern Jewish scholars of the New Testament actively study this chapter to reconstruct first-century Jewish legal and ethical frameworks. Academic reception frequently focuses on Paul's instructions regarding courts. In 'The Jewish Annotated New Testament', scholars note that the prohibition against utilizing outside courts (verses 1-6) closely mirrors later rabbinic prohibitions against bringing cases before Gentile courts (arka'ot shel goyim), a principle famously discussed in the Babylonian Talmud (Gittin 88b). Historians such as Peter J. Tomson view these verses as evidence that early Jewish-Christian communities maintained the structure of a diaspora beit din (rabbinic court) for internal arbitration.

Application — This chapter has no liturgical, legal, or devotional application in Judaism. It is applied exclusively in academic contexts, historical reconstruction, and interfaith dialogue to illustrate the shared legal and moral paradigms of first-century Judaism and early Christianity.

Autoridades citadas:Peter J. Tomson — Paul and the Jewish Law · Isaac W. Oliver and David Instone-Brewer — The Jewish Annotated New Testament

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
  • ✓ The text explicitly instructs the community to settle civil disputes internally
  • ✓ The chapter's sexual ethics rely on the scriptural precedent of Genesis 2:24 reg
  • ✓ Judaism does not recognize this text as Scripture, holding it to have no canonic
  • ✓ Modern Jewish academics compare the chapter's prohibition against secular courts
  • ✓ The chapter is entirely absent from Jewish religious practice, utilized strictly
Apêndice comparativo — fora da lista niceno-trinitariana (Latter-day Saint, Jehovah's Witnesses)
Latter-day Saint

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Latter-day Saint reading (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints): the Bible read alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, with living prophets and continuing revelation, and the Joseph Smith Translation where relevant. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.

Significado imediato — In this epistle, Paul addresses two major communal and ethical failures within the Corinthian church. First, he rebukes the saints for taking their internal disputes to pagan secular courts, arguing that those destined to judge the world and angels should be capable of resolving worldly matters among themselves (verses 1-8). Second, he lists behaviors that exclude individuals from the kingdom of God, heavily emphasizing sexual immorality. Paul refutes a Greco-Roman philosophical tendency to separate physical actions from spiritual standing; he insists that the physical body is meant for the Lord, will be resurrected, and is sacred (verses 9-20).

Reception — Latter-day Saint theology engages deeply with this chapter's teachings on the sanctity of the physical body. Unlike traditions that view the physical body as a temporary or inherently corrupt vessel, Latter-day Saint doctrine holds that the body and spirit inseparably connected constitute the eternal soul (as taught in the Doctrine and Covenants). Consequently, Paul’s teachings in verses 13-20 are received as foundational texts on the Law of Chastity. Elder Jeffrey R. Holland notably relies on this passage to explain that exploiting the physical body through sexual sin is a sin against the soul itself and a trivialization of Christ's Atonement, by which believers are 'bought with a price' (verse 20). Furthermore, the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) makes a significant alteration to verse 12. Where traditional texts read 'All things are lawful unto me,' the JST amends this to 'All things are not lawful unto me.' This change acts as a direct theological rejection of antinomianism, ensuring Paul's rhetoric cannot be misconstrued to permit immoral behavior under the guise of grace.

Application — Verse 19 ('know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost') is universally invoked in Latter-day Saint application, taught from early childhood through adulthood. It serves as the primary scriptural shorthand for a suite of practical standards regarding the physical body. The Church applies this 'body as a temple' metaphor to instruct members to strictly obey the Law of Chastity (complete sexual abstinence before heterosexual marriage and complete fidelity within it), to observe the Word of Wisdom (a health code abstaining from alcohol, tobacco, coffee, and tea), and to maintain standards of modesty in dress. Additionally, it forms the basis for discouraging bodily modifications such as elective tattoos and extensive piercings, as detailed in Church manuals like 'For the Strength of Youth'. Finally, Paul’s counsel in verses 1-8 informs a cultural and institutional preference for resolving disputes amicably or through priesthood leaders rather than immediately resorting to civil litigation against fellow members.

Autoridades citadas:Joseph Smith — Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible · Jeffrey R. Holland — Of Souls, Symbols, and Sacraments · First Presidency of the Church — For the Strength of Youth

Jehovah's Witnesses

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Jehovah's Witness reading (Watch Tower Society): attention to the divine name, God's Kingdom as a real government, conditional immortality, and a non-Trinitarian Christology. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.

Significado imediato — The apostle Paul rebukes the Corinthians for suing one another in secular courts, arguing that believers, who will eventually judge the world and angels, should be capable of resolving internal disputes. He provides a list of unrighteous practices—including sexual immorality, idolatry, and greed—that disqualify individuals from inheriting God's Kingdom, reminding the Corinthians that they were washed from such sins. He concludes by emphasizing the need to flee sexual immorality, asserting that believers' bodies belong to God and are a temple of the holy spirit, having been bought with a price.

Reception — In the theology of Jehovah's Witnesses, this chapter is central to maintaining congregational purity, resolving disputes internally, and understanding the heavenly government. Watch Tower publications interpret verses 1-8 as a directive to resolve business or personal disputes through congregation elders or personal concession, avoiding secular lawsuits against fellow Witnesses to protect Jehovah's name from public reproach. Verses 2-3 are strictly understood within the tradition's eschatological framework: the 'saints' or holy ones who will judge the world and angels are exclusively the 144,000 spirit-anointed Christians who are resurrected to rule with Jesus in the heavenly Kingdom, as detailed in 'Insight on the Scriptures'. Furthermore, the catalogue of sins in verses 9-10 forms a definitive legal and moral basis for congregation discipline. Verse 11’s reference to being washed in the spirit of God is read through a non-Trinitarian lens, where the holy spirit is understood as Jehovah's active force rather than a co-equal person.

Application — Jehovah's Witnesses apply this chapter by insisting on strict moral standards and internal conflict resolution. Believers are instructed to accept personal loss or fraud rather than sue a fellow Witness in a secular court. The moral prohibitions in verses 9-10 are strictly enforced; individuals striving for baptism must abandon such practices, and baptized members who revert to them without repentance face judicial committees and disfellowshipping. The command to flee fornication in verse 18 is frequently cited in pastoral counsel, urging Witnesses to avoid pornography, premarital sex, and other forms of sexual impurity, thereby keeping the congregation clean and themselves in God's favor.

Autoridades citadas:Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — The Watchtower · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Keep Yourselves in God's Love

Passo 4Estabelecer a base no idioma original

A tradução é construída a partir do texto fonte, não da maioria em inglês.

Base textual — Greek text provided (reflecting a Textus Receptus / Byzantine tradition base, as evidenced by the inclusion in verse 20)

Nomes divinos — Theos (God), Kyrios (Lord)

Variantes sinalizadas
  • v14: Manuscript variations exist between 'ἡμᾶς' (us) and 'ὑμᾶς' (you) for whom God will raise up; the provided text reads 'ἡμᾶς'.
  • v20: The provided text includes 'καὶ ἐν τῷ πνεύματι ὑμῶν ἅτινά ἐστιν τοῦ θεοῦ' (and in your spirit, which are God's), which is standard in the Textus Receptus and Byzantine majority but omitted in Alexandrian critical texts (NA28/UBS5).
Características que a tradução deve preservar
  • v1: (c) definite-article / demonstrative patterns: Parallel structure with definite articles 'ἐπὶ τῶν ἀδίκων καὶ οὐχὶ ἐπὶ τῶν ἁγίων' (before the unrighteous and not before the holy/saints).
  • v2: (a) cognate / (e) chiasm / (f) repetition: The refrain 'ἢ οὐκ οἴδατε ὅτι' (Or do you not know that) begins here; cognates 'κρινοῦσιν', 'κρίνεται', 'κριτηρίων' (judge / judged / judgments); a chiastic reversal of subject/object 'ἅγιοι τὸν κόσμον κρινοῦσιν... κρίνεται ὁ κόσμος' (saints judge the world ... the world is judged).
  • v3: (f) repetition / refrain structures: 'οὐκ οἴδατε ὅτι' (do you not know that); (h) particles: 'μήτι γε' (how much more / let alone).
  • v4: (a) cognate / (c) demonstrative: Repetition of 'βιωτικὰ' (from v.3) and 'κριτήρια' (from v.2); use of demonstrative 'τούτους' (these).
  • v5: (a) cognate: 'διακρῖναι' (discern/judge between) roots back to the 'κρίνω' uses throughout the context.
  • v6: (f) repetition / refrain structures: 'ἀδελφὸς μετὰ ἀδελφοῦ' (brother with brother); the verb 'κρίνεται' repeats the running theme.
  • v7: (a) cognate / (f) repetition: 'κρίματα' (judgments) echoes the root of the chapter; refrain structure 'διὰ τί οὐχὶ μᾶλλον ἀδικεῖσθε; διὰ τί οὐχὶ μᾶλλον ἀποστερεῖσθε;' (why not rather be wronged? why not rather be defrauded?).
  • v8: (a) cognate / wordplay: 'ἀδικεῖτε καὶ ἀποστερεῖτε' shifts to the active voice, playing directly off the passive forms in v. 7.
  • v9: (f) repetition / refrain / (g) divine-name: Refrain 'ἢ οὐκ οἴδατε ὅτι'; 'ἄδικοι' (unrighteous) links back to 'ἀδικεῖτε' (v.8) and 'ἀδίκων' (v.1); phrase 'θεοῦ βασιλείαν οὐ κληρονομήσουσιν' (will not inherit God's kingdom); polysyndeton with 'οὔτε' repeated five times.
  • v10: (e) chiasm / (f) repetition: The polysyndeton continues ('οὔτε... οὐ... οὐ... οὐχ'); phrase reverses the word order of kingdom and God to 'βασιλείαν θεοῦ οὐ κληρονομήσουσιν' (Kingdom of God will not inherit).
  • v11: (f) repetition / (g) divine-name: Triple repetition 'ἀλλ᾽ ἀπελούσασθε ἀλλ᾽ ἡγιάσθητε ἀλλ᾽ ἐδικαιώθητε' (but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified); parallel construction 'ἐν τῷ ὀνόματι... καὶ ἐν τῷ πνεύματι'; Divine names: Kyrios (Lord), Theos (God).
  • v12: (a) cognate / (f) repetition: Refrain 'Πάντα μοι ἔξεστιν ἀλλ᾽' (All things are lawful to me, but) repeated twice; cognate/wordplay between 'ἔξεστιν' (it is lawful/in my power) and 'ἐξουσιασθήσομαι' (brought under the power).
  • v13: (c) demonstrative / (e) chiasm / (g) divine-name: Chiasm 'τὰ βρώματα τῇ κοιλίᾳ καὶ ἡ κοιλία τοῖς βρώμασιν' (foods for the belly and the belly for foods) and 'οὐ τῇ πορνείᾳ ἀλλὰ τῷ κυρίῳ, καὶ ὁ κύριος τῷ σώματι'; demonstratives 'ταύτην καὶ ταῦτα' (this and these); Divine names: Theos (God), Kyrios (Lord).
  • v14: (a) cognate / (g) divine-name: Cognate verb prefixing 'ἤγειρεν' (raised) and 'ἐξεγερεῖ' (will raise out/up); Divine names: Theos (God), Kyrios (Lord).
  • v15: (f) repetition / (h) interjection: Refrain 'Οὐκ οἴδατε ὅτι'; triple repetition of 'μέλη' (members); double repetition of 'Χριστοῦ'; emphatic interjection 'μὴ γένοιτο' (may it not be / God forbid).
  • v16: (f) repetition: Refrain 'ἢ οὐκ οἴδατε ὅτι'; strict structural parallelism begins here with 'ὁ κολλώμενος τῇ πόρνῃ ἓν σῶμά ἐστιν' (he who is joined to the prostitute is one body).
  • v17: (e) chiasm / parallelism / (g) divine-name: Exact structural parallel to v. 16 'ὁ δὲ κολλώμενος τῷ κυρίῳ ἓν πνεῦμά ἐστιν' (but he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit); Divine name: Kyrios (Lord).
  • v18: (a) cognate / (f) repetition: Double cognate pairings: 'πορνείαν / πορνεύων' (fornication / committing fornication) and 'ἁμάρτημα / ἁμαρτάνει' (sin / sins); contrastive repetition of 'σώματός' (outside the body) and 'σῶμα' (against his own body).
  • v19: (d) number shifts / (f) repetition / (g) divine-name: Refrain 'ἢ οὐκ οἴδατε ὅτι'; number shift between singular 'σῶμα' (body) and plural 'ὑμῶν' (your) - 'your body is a temple'; Divine name: Theos (God).
  • v20: (f) repetition / (g) divine-name / (h) particles: Particle 'δὴ' (now/therefore); repetition in the variant text 'ἐν τῷ σώματι ὑμῶν καὶ ἐν τῷ πνεύματι ὑμῶν' (in your body and in your spirit); Divine name: Theos (God) repeated twice.

Passo 5Comparar as traduções, versículo por versículo

Cada diferença classificada: textual · lexical · gramatical · interpretativa · estilística (esta última apenas quando altera o sentido).

  • lexicalv1 translation of 'unjust' vs 'unrighteous' — “unjust” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unrighteous” (WEB, ASV, YLT)
  • grammaticalv2 (vv 2, 3, 9, 15, 16, 19) formulation of the rhetorical question — “Do ye not know” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “Don’t you” (WEB) vs “Or know” (ASV) vs “have known” (YLT) vs “then” (DARBY) vs “you not” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv2 (vv 2, 3) modal verb choice ('shall' vs 'will') — “shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “will” (WEB, WEBSTER)
  • lexicalv2 translation of 'the' vs 'this' (world) — “the” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “this” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv2 tense of the passive verb ('is' vs 'shall be') — “is” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “shall be” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
  • grammaticalv2 infinitive vs prepositional phrase for the complement — “to judge” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “of” (YLT, DARBY)
  • lexicalv2 translation of 'smallest matters/judgments' — “smallest matters” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “smaller judgments” (YLT) vs “judgments” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv5 phrasing of the interrogative or introductory clause — “Is it so that” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Isn’t” (WEB) vs “What cannot” (ASV) vs “I speak” (YLT) vs “Thus” (DARBY)
  • grammaticalv7 translation of introductory particles — “Now therefore there” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “it” (WEB) vs “Nay already it” (ASV) vs “Already indeed then” (YLT) vs “Already indeed then it” (DARBY) vs “Already indeed” (DRC)
  • lexicalv7 translation of 'altogether/utterly' — “altogether” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “utterly” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “already altogether” (WEB) vs “plainly” (DRC)
  • lexicalv7 translation of 'fault/defect' and its preposition — “fault among” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “defect in” (WEB, ASV) vs “in” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv8 translation of the adversative and pronoun — “But” (DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “No but you yourselves” (WEB) vs “Nay ye” (KJV) vs “but yourselves” (ASV) vs “but ye” (YLT) vs “But you” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv8 phrasing of the demonstrative and object — “that your brethren” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “against brothers” (WEB) vs “these” (YLT) vs “this” (DARBY) vs “to” (DRC)
  • lexicalv9 translation of 'fornicators / sexually immoral' — “fornicators” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the sexually immoral” (WEB) vs “whoremongers” (YLT)
  • lexicalv10 translation of 'revilers / slanderers' — “revilers” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “slanderers” (WEB) vs “abusive persons” (DARBY) vs “railers” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv11 tense/aspect of the passive verbs — “ye are” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “were” (ASV, YLT) vs “you were” (WEB) vs “have been” (DARBY) vs “you” (DRC)
  • textualv11 'the' vs 'our' (for the Lord) — “the” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “our” (DRC)
  • lexicalv12 preposition choice (to/for/unto) — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “for” (WEB, ASV) vs “unto” (KJV)
  • lexicalv12 phrasing of being brought under power — “the power of any” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “anything” (WEB) vs “authority by” (YLT)
  • lexicalv13 translation of 'meats' vs 'foods' — “Meats” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Foods” (WEB) vs “the are” (YLT) vs “Meat” (DRC)
  • lexicalv13 translation of 'meats/foods' and the connective — “meats but” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “foods” (WEB) vs “the And” (YLT) vs “the” (DRC)
  • lexicalv13 translation of 'fornication / sexual immorality' — “fornication” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “sexual immorality” (WEB) vs “whoredom” (YLT) vs “lewdness” (WEBSTER)
  • lexicalv14 translation of the conjunction (And/Now) — “And” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Now” (WEB, DRC)
  • lexicalv16 translation of 'a/the harlot/prostitute' — “a” (ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the” (YLT, DARBY) vs “a prostitute” (WEB) vs “an harlot” (KJV)
  • lexicalv18 translation of 'flee fornication/sexual immorality' — “Flee fornication” (KJV, ASV, DARBY) vs “sexual immorality” (WEB) vs “the whoredom” (YLT) vs “lewdness” (WEBSTER) vs “Fly” (DRC)
  • grammaticalv18 translation of the relative pronoun clause — “that” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “whatever” (YLT) vs “which” (DARBY)
  • lexicalv18 translation of the verb 'do/commit/practise' — “doeth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “does” (WEB) vs “may commit” (YLT) vs “may practise” (DARBY) vs “doth” (DRC)
  • lexicalv18 translation of 'without/outside' — “without” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “outside” (WEB)
  • lexicalv19 translation of 'body is a/the temple' vs 'members' — “body is the temple” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “a” (WEB, ASV) vs “a sanctuary” (YLT) vs “members are” (DRC)
  • interpretivev19 rendering of the Holy Spirit/Ghost and relative pronoun — “Spirit” (ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Spirit who” (WEB) vs “Ghost which is” (KJV) vs “who” (DRC)
  • interpretivev19 relative pronoun referring to the Holy Spirit (which/whom) — “which ye” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “whom you” (WEB, DRC)
  • lexicalv19 preposition 'from/of' — “from” (WEB, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “of” (KJV, DARBY)
  • stylisticv19 conjunction before 'you are not your own' — “and ye” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “You” (WEB, DRC)
  • grammaticalv20 tense of the passive verb 'bought' — “ye are” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “were” (ASV, YLT) vs “you were” (WEB) vs “have been” (DARBY) vs “you” (DRC)

Passo 6Sintetizar — alegações atômicas, por família, não por número de assentos

Cada declaração é dividida nas menores alegações testáveis; cada perfil elegível é AFIRMA / NEGA / QUALIFICA / SILENCIA sobre cada uma.

O consenso

Interpreting Paul's words in verse 11, Christians broadly affirm that being washed, sanctified, and justified describes a definitive, experiential severance from the controlling power of past sins. However, the exact nature of this washing is disputed, with a major divide over whether it refers to the sacrament of water baptism actively delivering justification and sanctification, or to a spiritual regeneration by the Holy Spirit distinct from the physical act, alongside disagreements over whether this renewal is an ontological transformation or a purely forensic declaration. The practical application of the chapter is also disputed, revealing divides over whether believers are strictly prohibited from using secular civil courts for internal disputes, whether the text establishes congregational autonomy, and whether the vice list entails absolute prohibitions regarding same-sex activity or describes grave matter requiring sacramental confession. Finally, several traditions emphasize that the believer's body is mystically united to the incarnate Christ, leading some traditions to mandate rigorous ascetic disciplines or physically expressive worship, while it remains disputed whether maintaining physical health through diet and temperance constitutes a sacred moral obligation.

Amplo — APOIO em todas as famílias, exceto uma, sendo esta indeterminada

  • The declaration that believers were washed, sanctified, and justified describes a definitive, experiential severance from the controlling power of past sins.

    7 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 4 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre SUPPORT
    quem disse o quê (8)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      “John Chrysostom ('Homilies on 1 Corinthians') emphasizes this same reality, noting the profound grace that completely transforms the believer from a state of impurity to radiant holiness.”
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “Severus of Antioch emphasizes that this sacramental washing fundamentally alters the believer's constitution, relocating them from the realm of the unrighteous (verses 9-10) into the kingdom of God by the power of the Spirit.”
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      “Furthermore, 20th-century theologian John Murray, in 'Redemption Accomplished and Applied', identifies verse 11 as a primary text for definitive sanctification, representing the decisive, once-for-all breach with the kingdom of sin that grounds all progressive holiness.”
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      “Verses 9-11 form a central pillar in Baptist soteriology, frequently cited in the Second London Confession of 1689 to demonstrate the definitive break from the dominion of sin through effectual calling, justification, and sanctification.”
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      “John Wesley, in his 'Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament', comments on Paul's unusual ordering of these terms (putting sanctification before justification), explaining that Paul is not establishing a chronological sequence but describing the comprehensive, simultaneous work of the Spirit at conversion—where guilt is removed (justification) and the power of sin is broken (initial sanctification).”
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      “The transition in verse 11 ('such were some of you, but ye are washed') is read as the fruit of believer's baptism—a total, visible break from the old life.”
    • Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
      “Verse 11 is read as a powerful Trinitarian summary of salvation that highlights the transformative, experiential washing and sanctifying power of the Holy Spirit, which permanently breaks the bondage of the sins listed in verses 9-10.”
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
      “Alexander Campbell, in 'The Christian System', utilized this verse to argue that baptism is the instrumental point at which a believer is formally sanctified and justified, marking the boundary between the lifestyle of verses 9-10 and salvation.”

Específico de família — característico de uma família

  • Verse 11 demonstrates that justification and sanctification are distinct acts of God that are inseparably granted together to the believer.

    3 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (3)
    • Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
      “Richard Hooker turned to verse 11 ('washed... sanctified... justified') to articulate the classic reformed Anglican distinction between the imputed righteousness of justification and the infused righteousness of sanctification, while maintaining their inseparable reception in the believer.”
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      “The Westminster Divines in the 'Westminster Confession of Faith' utilize it to demonstrate that while justification and sanctification are distinct acts of God, they are inseparably bound together in the believer by the Spirit.”
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      “John Wesley, in his 'Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament', comments on Paul's unusual ordering of these terms (putting sanctification before justification), explaining that Paul is not establishing a chronological sequence but describing the comprehensive, simultaneous work of the Spirit at conversion—where guilt is removed (justification) and the power of sin is broken (initial sanctification).”
  • Believers' physical bodies are literally and mystically united to the incarnate Christ, making sexual immorality a sacrilegious desecration of this union.

    5 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 7 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (5)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      “He argues that sexual immorality (fornication) is not merely a rule broken but a profound sacrilege against the spousal meaning of the body, tearing members away from Christ to join them to a harlot.”
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “Symeon the New Theologian, in his 'Discourses', strongly emphasizes the visceral, mystical reality of verse 15, asserting that believers' physical bodies genuinely become members of the resurrected Christ, making bodily purity a necessity of maintaining this divine union.”
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “For Cyril, this undergirds the reality of the believer's union with Christ; because the Word became flesh, Christians are physically and spiritually grafted into Him through the Eucharist, which demands that the physical body be kept holy.”
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      “Finally, Paul addresses sexual immorality and antinomian slogans, arguing that the believer's body is united with Christ, is a temple of the Holy Spirit, and was bought with a price, necessitating bodily glorification of God rather than participation in sexual sin (vv. 12-20).”
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      “Because the believer's body is united with Christ and serves as a temple of the Holy Spirit, purchased at a price, sexual immorality is a uniquely severe sin against one's own body, necessitating a life that glorifies God in body and spirit (vv. 12-20).”
  • The command to glorify God in the physical body mandates rigorous ascetic disciplines such as fasting and prostrations.

    3 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (3)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      “The command to 'glorify God in your body' (v. 20) anchors the ascetic practices of both Latin and Eastern Catholic monastics and laity; fasting, bodily mortification, and the observance of chastity according to one's state in life are embraced as means to consecrate and safeguard the physical temple of the Holy Spirit.”
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “The command to 'glorify God in your body' (verse 20) deeply informs the somatic nature of Orthodox worship and ascetic practice. Fasting, prostrations, standing during the Liturgy, and making the sign of the cross are not viewed as punishments for the flesh, but as ways to engage the body as a sanctified vessel and temple of the Holy Spirit.”
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “Because the body itself must 'glorify God' (verse 20) and is destined for resurrection (verse 14), ascetic practices such as prostrations (metanoias), rigorous fasting, and standing for long hours are seen as the proper maintenance of the Spirit's temple.”
  • The command to glorify God in the body provides scriptural validation for physically expressive acts of worship in the congregation.

    3 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (3)
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “The command to 'glorify God in your body' (verse 20) deeply informs the somatic nature of Orthodox worship and ascetic practice. Fasting, prostrations, standing during the Liturgy, and making the sign of the cross are not viewed as punishments for the flesh, but as ways to engage the body as a sanctified vessel and temple of the Holy Spirit.”
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “Liturgically, the tradition applies this chapter’s theology of the body through intense physical participation in worship.”
    • Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
      “Finally, the command to 'glorify God in your body' (v. 20) is regularly cited to encourage physically demonstrative worship, such as the raising of hands, dancing, and vocal praise in the congregation.”

Específico de tradição — apenas uma tradição

  • Paul's prohibition on lawsuits condemns vindictiveness and a lack of mutual equity, but does not invalidate the institution of the civil magistracy itself.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      “John Calvin's 'Commentary on the Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians' argues that Paul does not condemn the civil magistracy itself, but rather the vindictive spirit of the Corinthians and the public scandal of believers failing to judge disputes with mutual equity.”
  • The saints' future judgment of the world involves sharing in Christ's judicial power by assessing matters according to divine truth.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      “Thomas Aquinas ('Commentary on 1 Corinthians') explains that saints will 'judge the world and angels' not by pronouncing new laws, but by a shared participation in Christ's judicial truth.”
  • The saints will judge the world and fallen angels during a millennial thousand years in heaven to vindicate God's justice.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
      “During the millennium, the saints will participate in the judgment of the wicked and fallen angels, reviewing their records to vindicate God's justice before the final destruction of sin.”
  • Verses 9-10 function as the strict Law that crushes self-righteousness, contrasting with the pure Gospel of justification in verse 11.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      “Verses 9-10 function as the strict Law, identifying sins that exclude one from the kingdom and crushing human self-righteousness. In immediate contrast, verse 11 stands as pure Gospel.”
  • The vice list necessitates the use of formal church discipline to maintain a pure, visible community of believers.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      “The vice list demonstrates that unrepentant sinners will not inherit the kingdom, necessitating church discipline to maintain a pure visible church.”
  • Believers are counseled to daily return to the objective promise of their baptismal washing when their conscience is accused by the Law.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      “When confronted by the crushing weight of the Law in verses 9-10, the pastoral response is to point the penitent to the objective promise of verse 11: they have already been washed and justified in Christ's name.”
  • The assertion that 'all things are lawful' reflects the inner freedom of faith, which must be paired with bodily discipline so as not to be mastered by the flesh.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      “Regarding verse 12 ('All things are lawful'), Luther engages this concept in *On the Freedom of a Christian*, explaining that while faith makes a Christian perfectly free from the Law for salvation, the Christian freely subjects the body to discipline to avoid being mastered by the flesh and to serve the neighbor.”
  • The designation of the believer's body as a 'temple of the Holy Spirit' demonstrates the full divinity of the Spirit, as temples are exclusively the dwelling places of God.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “Basil the Great famously draws upon verse 19 in 'On the Holy Spirit' to defend the full divinity and consubstantiality of the Spirit, arguing that because a temple is a dwelling place proper only to God, the Spirit who inhabits the believer must be fully divine.”
  • The declaration that the body is the temple of the Holy Spirit provides scriptural grounding for the doctrine of entire sanctification and the eradication of resident sin.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      “Adam Clarke, in his 'Commentary on the Bible', reinforces this by arguing that the indwelling of the Holy Spirit (v. 19) is incompatible with resident sin, requiring a deep moral purity and demonstrating the power of God's grace to cleanse the believer completely.”
  • The physical body serving as the purchased temple of the Holy Spirit provides a theological basis for expecting divine physical healing.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
      “F.F. Bosworth and early Pentecostal pioneers argued that because the physical body was purchased by Christ's atonement and is actively indwelt by the Holy Spirit, God has a vested interest in the physical health of His temple.”
  • The call to remember that one's body was 'bought with a price' conceptually undergirds Eucharistic liturgies where worshippers offer their bodies to God as a living sacrifice.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
      “Finally, verse 20 ('glorify God in your body') conceptually undergirds the classic Prayer of Oblation in the Book of Common Prayer's Eucharist, where communicants present themselves, their 'souls and bodies, to be a reasonable, holy, and living sacrifice' to God.”
  • The believer's body being bought with a price requires it to be entirely yielded to Christ, precluding any participation in worldly violence.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      “Furthermore, the teaching that the body is a temple 'bought with a price' (verses 19-20) is integrated into the practice of Gelassenheit (yieldedness)—the total surrender of one's physical life, resources, and autonomy to Christ and His gathered body, rejecting both sexual immorality and any participation in worldly violence.”
  • The believer's greatest comfort and motivation for holiness is the knowledge that they belong entirely, body and soul, to Jesus Christ who purchased them.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 10 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (2)
    • Lutheran · QUALIFY
      “This ethical life is never pursued to earn salvation, but flows spontaneously from the reality that the believer's body is a temple of the Holy Spirit and belongs to a crucified and risen Lord who bought them with a price (1 Corinthians 6:19-20).”
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      “The 'Heidelberg Catechism' draws directly on these verses to assert that the believer's greatest comfort is that they belong, body and soul, to their faithful Savior Jesus Christ, who has bought them with a price.”

Em disputa — uma família é mista, ou famílias afirmam vs. negam

  • Believers are strictly prohibited from bringing internal disputes before secular civil courts, and must resolve them within the church.

    6 afirmam · 0 negam · 2 qualificam · 4 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
    quem disse o quê (8)
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “Practically, Paul's injunction against suing believers in secular courts (verses 1-8) shaped the historical development of communal canonical courts (such as the traditional Coptic Majlis Milli), where the church seeks to mediate civil and family disputes internally to avoid public scandal before unbelievers and to govern the community by spiritual wisdom.”
    • Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
      “First, he rebukes believers for taking lawsuits against one another to pagan secular courts, arguing that those destined to judge angels should be able to mediate internal disputes, and asserting that it is better to suffer wrong than to defraud a brother (verses 1-8).”
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
      “First, he rebukes believers for taking internal disputes before pagan civil magistrates rather than resolving them within the church, reminding them of their eschatological destiny to judge the world and angels (vv. 1-8).”
    • Baptist · QUALIFY
      “First, congregations apply verses 1-8 by formally mediating disputes between members—whether relational or financial—through church leadership or congregational meetings, explicitly discouraging believers from suing one another in civil courts.”
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      “He rebukes believers for bringing grievances before secular magistrates rather than resolving them within the community of saints, arguing that it is better to be defrauded than to shame the church's witness (vv. 1-8).”
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      “In practice, Anabaptist and Mennonite congregations historically forbid members from initiating lawsuits, insisting that disputes be settled through congregational discernment or mediation.”
    • Seventh-day Adventist · QUALIFY
      “Based on verses 1-8, church members are generally counseled to resolve interpersonal and business disputes within the church community—often utilizing mediation or church discipline—rather than resorting to secular litigation, thereby protecting the church's witness.”
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
      “Regarding verses 1-8, commentators like David Lipscomb in 'A Commentary on the New Testament Epistles' read the text as a binding prohibition against Christians engaging in civil litigation against one another, stressing the autonomy and internal competence of the local congregation.”
  • Paul's command to judge internal disputes establishes the autonomy of the local congregation to resolve matters without reliance on higher ecclesiastical or secular courts.

    2 afirmam · 1 negam · 2 qualificam · 7 silenciamAntiga LEANING-CONTESTEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (5)
    • Catholic · DENY
      “Furthermore, Paul's rebuke of public secular lawsuits among believers (vs. 1-6) historically informed the development of internal canonical tribunals to resolve disputes without causing scandal to the outside world.”
    • Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
      “The pastoral application of verses 1-8 has historically informed the development of internal ecclesiastical courts and canon law, meant to handle church disputes without bringing the church into disrepute in civil spaces.”
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · QUALIFY
      “Corporately, verses 1-8 undergird the establishment of church courts, such as sessions and presbyteries, to adjudicate disputes and exercise church discipline, thereby protecting the church's witness from public scandal.”
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      “Verses 1-8 are foundational for Baptist congregationalism; John Gill, in his 'Exposition of the New Testament', emphasizes that the local church possesses the inherent authority and wisdom to judge its own internal matters without recourse to secular magistrates, a reading that reinforced early Baptist commitments to the separation of church and state.”
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
      “Regarding verses 1-8, commentators like David Lipscomb in 'A Commentary on the New Testament Epistles' read the text as a binding prohibition against Christians engaging in civil litigation against one another, stressing the autonomy and internal competence of the local congregation.”
  • The prohibition against believers going to law before the unrighteous establishes a fundamental separation of the church from the coercive, secular justice system.

    2 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (3)
    • Reformed / Presbyterian · QUALIFY
      “John Calvin's 'Commentary on the Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Corinthians' argues that Paul does not condemn the civil magistracy itself, but rather the vindictive spirit of the Corinthians and the public scandal of believers failing to judge disputes with mutual equity.”
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      “John Gill, in his 'Exposition of the New Testament', emphasizes that the local church possesses the inherent authority and wisdom to judge its own internal matters without recourse to secular magistrates, a reading that reinforced early Baptist commitments to the separation of church and state.”
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
      “Believers must not use worldly courts to settle disputes, as the church is separate from the secular sword and its coercive justice system.”
  • Believers must willingly suffer injustice and be defrauded rather than engage in worldly lawsuits, serving as a mandate for defenselessness and ascetic humility.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 2 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
    quem disse o quê (3)
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “John Chrysostom, in his 'Homilies on First Corinthians', emphasizes the ascetic mandate in verses 7-8, teaching that to suffer wrong and be defrauded voluntarily is a mark of true Christian philosophy and an imitation of Christ's kenosis (self-emptying).”
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
      “On a communal level, verses 1-8 are applied as a mandate for internal church discipline, peace-making, and restorative justice, urging congregations to cultivate a warm-hearted practical piety where believers would rather suffer personal loss than bring disrepute upon the name of Christ before the unbelieving world.”
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
      “Conrad Grebel and the early Swiss Brethren emphasized verse 7 as a mandate for defenselessness; true discipleship involves a willingness to be defrauded rather than retaliating or seeking coercive justice.”
  • The sins listed in verses 9-10 objectively constitute grave matter that destroys charity, excludes a person from the Kingdom of God, and necessitates sacramental confession.

    1 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 10 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
    quem disse o quê (2)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      “Because the sins of verses 9-10 exclude one from the kingdom, Catholic practice mandates that anyone conscious of having committed them must receive absolution in the Sacrament of Penance before approaching the Eucharist.”
    • Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
      “The vice list demonstrates that unrepentant sinners will not inherit the kingdom, necessitating church discipline to maintain a pure visible church.”
  • The vice list contains an enduring moral absolute prohibiting all same-sex sexual activity.

    0 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
      “Conservative evangelicals and the Global South (GAFCON) read the terms 'effeminate' and 'abusers of themselves with mankind' (often translating the Greek 'arsenokoitai' and 'malakoi') as clear, abiding scriptural prohibitions against all same-sex sexual relationships, affirming this as the plain, historic teaching of the church.”
  • The vice list specifically condemns historical forms of exploitative or abusive sexual practices rather than consensual same-sex unions.

    0 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
    quem disse o quê (1)
    • Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
      “Conversely, progressive and broad church voices within the Episcopal Church and other western provinces rely on historical-critical reason to argue that these terms refer to exploitative, unequal Roman practices (such as pederasty or prostitution), and thus do not condemn faithful, covenanted same-sex unions.”
  • The washing, sanctifying, and justifying of believers in verse 11 describes a real, ontological inner renewal rather than a purely forensic declaration of righteousness.

    3 afirmam · 0 negam · 2 qualificam · 7 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
    quem disse o quê (5)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      “The Council of Trent's 'Decree on Justification' insists that the 'washing, sanctifying, and justifying' in the name of Christ and the Spirit describes a simultaneous, ontological renewal of the soul occurring in Baptism, explicitly rejecting the notion of a merely forensic or imputed righteousness.”
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “Verse 11 is universally received as a description of the Mysteries of Initiation (Baptism and Chrismation); the Orthodox tradition understands 'washed,' 'sanctified,' and 'justified' not merely as forensic declarations, but as real, ontological transformations effected by the Holy Spirit.”
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “Severus of Antioch emphasizes that this sacramental washing fundamentally alters the believer's constitution, relocating them from the realm of the unrighteous (verses 9-10) into the kingdom of God by the power of the Spirit.”
    • Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
      “Richard Hooker turned to verse 11 ('washed... sanctified... justified') to articulate the classic reformed Anglican distinction between the imputed righteousness of justification and the infused righteousness of sanctification, while maintaining their inseparable reception in the believer.”
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
      “John Wesley, in his 'Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament', comments on Paul's unusual ordering of these terms (putting sanctification before justification), explaining that Paul is not establishing a chronological sequence but describing the comprehensive, simultaneous work of the Spirit at conversion—where guilt is removed (justification) and the power of sin is broken (initial sanctification).”
  • The 'washing' in verse 11 refers to the sacrament of water baptism, which actively delivers the justification and sanctification it signifies.

    5 afirmam · 1 negam · 1 qualificam · 5 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
    quem disse o quê (7)
    • Catholic · AFFIRM
      “The Council of Trent's 'Decree on Justification' insists that the 'washing, sanctifying, and justifying' in the name of Christ and the Spirit describes a simultaneous, ontological renewal of the soul occurring in Baptism, explicitly rejecting the notion of a merely forensic or imputed righteousness.”
    • Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “Verse 11 is universally received as a description of the Mysteries of Initiation (Baptism and Chrismation); the Orthodox tradition understands 'washed,' 'sanctified,' and 'justified' not merely as forensic declarations, but as real, ontological transformations effected by the Holy Spirit.”
    • Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
      “Furthermore, the declaration that the Corinthians were 'washed,' 'sanctified,' and 'justified' (verse 11) is universally received as a description of the mysteries of Baptism and Myron (Chrismation).”
    • Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
      “The tradition applies verse 11 to its theology of Holy Baptism, where the spiritual reality of being 'washed' and 'sanctified' is sacramentally conferred.”
    • Lutheran · AFFIRM
      “Luther's *Large Catechism* emphasizes that this washing is not merely a symbolic ritual but a means of grace that actually delivers the sanctification and justification it signifies.”
    • Baptist · DENY
      “Furthermore, consistent with a memorial view of the ordinances, Baptist theologians like A.H. Strong ('Systematic Theology') read the 'washing' in verse 11 not as a reference to the physical waters of baptism (baptismal regeneration), but as the spiritual cleansing of regeneration by the Holy Spirit, of which water baptism is merely the outward symbol.”
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
      “The tradition firmly reads 'you were washed' in verse 11 as a direct reference to water baptism by immersion. Alexander Campbell, in 'The Christian System', utilized this verse to argue that baptism is the instrumental point at which a believer is formally sanctified and justified, marking the boundary between the lifestyle of verses 9-10 and salvation.”
  • The 'washing' in verse 11 refers to spiritual regeneration by the Holy Spirit, distinct from the physical act of water baptism.

    1 afirmam · 6 negam · 0 qualificam · 5 silenciamAntiga OPPOSEReforma OPPOSEIgreja Livre MIXED
    quem disse o quê (7)
    • Catholic · DENY
      “The Council of Trent's 'Decree on Justification' insists that the 'washing, sanctifying, and justifying' in the name of Christ and the Spirit describes a simultaneous, ontological renewal of the soul occurring in Baptism, explicitly rejecting the notion of a merely forensic or imputed righteousness.”
    • Eastern Orthodox · DENY
      “Verse 11 is universally received as a description of the Mysteries of Initiation (Baptism and Chrismation); the Orthodox tradition understands 'washed,' 'sanctified,' and 'justified' not merely as forensic declarations, but as real, ontological transformations effected by the Holy Spirit.”
    • Oriental Orthodox · DENY
      “Furthermore, the declaration that the Corinthians were 'washed,' 'sanctified,' and 'justified' (verse 11) is universally received as a description of the mysteries of Baptism and Myron (Chrismation).”
    • Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
      “The tradition applies verse 11 to its theology of Holy Baptism, where the spiritual reality of being 'washed' and 'sanctified' is sacramentally conferred.”
    • Lutheran · DENY
      “Furthermore, the tradition explicitly identifies the 'washing' of verse 11 with the sacrament of Holy Baptism.”
    • Baptist · AFFIRM
      “Furthermore, consistent with a memorial view of the ordinances, Baptist theologians like A.H. Strong ('Systematic Theology') read the 'washing' in verse 11 not as a reference to the physical waters of baptism (baptismal regeneration), but as the spiritual cleansing of regeneration by the Holy Spirit, of which water baptism is merely the outward symbol.”
    • Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
      “The tradition firmly reads 'you were washed' in verse 11 as a direct reference to water baptism by immersion.”
  • Because the physical body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, maintaining physical health through diet, temperance, and abstinence from harmful substances is a sacred moral obligation.

    2 afirmam · 0 negam · 2 qualificam · 8 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
    quem disse o quê (4)
    • Baptist · QUALIFY
      “Third, verses 18-20 are heavily emphasized in youth ministries, premarital counseling, and moral instruction to promote sexual purity and the avoidance of substance abuse, urging believers to 'glorify God in your body' because they are indwelt by the Spirit and purchased by Christ's blood.”
    • Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
      “Verses 19-20 are frequently invoked to promote abstention from physically destructive habits (historically informing the tradition's temperance movements and stances against alcohol and tobacco) and to uphold strict sexual ethics.”
    • Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · QUALIFY
      “Verses 19-20 are applied as a strict mandate for personal holiness, historically used to urge believers to abstain from anything that might defile the physical temple, such as alcohol, tobacco, and sexual immorality.”
    • Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
      “Because the body is God's temple, defiling it with improper diet, alcohol, tobacco, or unhealthy habits impairs the nervous system and diminishes the mind's ability to discern the promptings of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, maintaining physical health is viewed as a sacred, moral obligation rather than a secular matter.”

Passo 7Renderizar a New Consensus Bible

A partir do texto no idioma original. As tradições documentam a recepção; elas não votam na formulação. Toda formulação contestada que a tradução resolveu está listada abaixo, não oculta.

1Does any of you, having a matter against another, dare to go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints? 2Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is judged by you, are you unworthy of the smallest judgments? 3Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more, matters of this life? 4If then you have judgments of this life, do you seat these to judge who are despised in the church? 5I speak this to your shame. Is it so that there is no one wise among you who will be able to judge between his brothers? 6But brother is judged with brother, and this before unbelievers! 7Already then it is altogether a defeat for you that you have judgments with one another. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be defrauded? 8But you yourselves do wrong and defraud, and this to brothers! 9Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor men who sleep with men, 10nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor slanderers, nor extortionists, will inherit the kingdom of God. 11And these things some of you were. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God. 12"All things are in my power," but not all things are beneficial. "All things are in my power," but I will not be brought under the power of anything. 13"Foods for the belly, and the belly for foods," but God will bring to nothing both this and these. But the body is not for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body; 14and God both raised the Lord and will raise us out by his power. 15Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a prostitute? May it never be! 16Or do you not know that he who is joined to the prostitute is one body? For, "The two," he says, "will become one flesh." 17But he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit. 18Flee sexual immorality. Every sin whatever a person commits is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. 19Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit in you, whom you have from God? And you are not your own, 20for you were bought with a price; glorify God, then, in your body and in your spirit, which are God's.

Escolhas feitas — cada disputa que a tradução resolveu

VersículoFonteOpçõesEscolhaMotivoCat.
v1τῶν ἀδίκων(T) the unjust, (S) the unrighteousthe unrighteousPreserves linguistic alignment with related forms of 'dikaios' across the passage.lexical
v1οὐχὶ ἐπὶ τῶν ἁγίων(T) not before the saints, (S) not before the holy onesnot before the saintsRetains the widely recognized substantive translation of the adjective.lexical
v1κρίνεσθαι(T) go to law, (A) utilize coercive secular justice systemsgo to lawTranslates the Greek idiom directly without interpolating historical or theological claims about church-state separation.interpretive
v2κριτηρίων ἐλαχίστων(T) smallest matters, (T) smaller judgments, (S) smallest judgmentssmallest judgmentsPreserves the repetitive use of the 'krino' root throughout the rhetorical argument.lexical
v4τούτους(T) them, (T) these, (S) seat thesetheseAccurately represents the demonstrative pronoun and connects it to the specific object.grammatical
v5διακρῖναι(T) decide, (T) judge, (T) discern, (S) judge betweenjudge betweenMaintains the cognate connection to the judging motif central to the chapter.lexical
v6κρίνεται(T) goes to law, (T) goes to be judged, (S) is judgedis judgedTranslates the passive voice directly to sustain the pattern established in verse 2.grammatical
v7ἥττημα(T) fault, (T) defect, (S) defeatdefeatRecovers the literal sense of hettema as a loss or failure.lexical
v7ἀδικεῖσθε(T) take wrong / be wronged, (A) willingly suffer injustice as an ascetic mandatebe wrongedDirectly translates the passive verb without codifying a specific ascetic theology regarding self-defense.interpretive
v8ἀδικεῖτε καὶ ἀποστερεῖτε(T) do wrong, and defraud, (S) do wrong and defrauddo wrong and defraudMaintains the active-voice shift creating wordplay against the preceding passive verbs.stylistic
v9οὔτε... οὔτε(T) collapse the conjunctions, (S) preserve neither/nor polysyndetonneither... norPreserves the rhetorical weight of the repeated negative particles.stylistic
v9ἀρσενοκοῖται(T) abusers of themselves with mankind, (T) homosexuals, (S) men who sleep with men, (A) historical forms of exploitative sexual practicesmen who sleep with menTranslates the morphology of the compound term rather than importing restrictive historical paradigms or modern psychological constructs.lexical
v10κληρονομήσουσιν(T) will not inherit, (A) constitutes grave matter destroying charitywill not inheritRenders the explicit eschatological warning without importing later sacramental categories.interpretive
v11ἀπελούσασθε(T) are washed, (T) were washed, (A) were baptized in water, (A) experienced spiritual regenerationwere washedTranslates the aorist verb directly without imposing a singular sacramental or non-sacramental framework.interpretive
v11τοῦ κυρίου ἡμῶν(T) the Lord, (T) our Lord, (S) our Lordour LordReflects the possessive pronoun present in the provided Greek source.textual
v12ἔξεστιν... ἐξουσιασθήσομαι(T) lawful... brought under the power, (S) in my power... brought under the powerin my power... brought under the powerCaptures the explicit root-cognate wordplay between exestin and exousiasthesomai.lexical
v12Πάντα μοι ἔξεστιν(T) no quotation marks, (A) quotation marks to denote diatribequotation marks to denote diatribeIdentifies the clauses as Corinthian slogans in dialogue, reflecting broad scholarly consensus on the passage's rhetorical structure.interpretive
v13ταύτην καὶ ταῦτα(T) it and them, (S) this and thesethis and theseAccurately represents the demonstrative pronouns matching the nouns.grammatical
v13τὰ βρώματα(T) Meats, (T) Foods, (A) diet tied to moral physical healthFoodsTranslates the biological term accurately without expanding it into a mandate for moral physical health maintenance.interpretive
v14ἐξεγερεῖ(T) will raise up, (S) will raise outwill raise outPreserves the distinct 'ex-' prefix in the compound verb contrasting with the earlier simple verb.lexical
v15μὴ γένοιτο(T) God forbid, (T) May it never beMay it never beTranslates the strong optative phrase accurately without improperly inserting the Divine Name.interpretive
v15μέλη Χριστοῦ(T) members of Christ, (A) mystically united requiring ascetic disciplinesmembers of ChristTranslates the physiological metaphor directly without mandating specific downstream ascetic disciplines.interpretive
v17πνεῦμά(T) Spirit, (S) spiritspiritCapitalization choice: renders the term lower-case to denote the human spirit's resultant union, paralleling 'one flesh'.interpretive
v18πορνείαν(T) fornication, (T) lewdness, (S) sexual immoralitysexual immoralityUses contemporary English conveying the broad scope of porneia.lexical
v18ὃ ἐὰν ποιήσῃ ἄνθρωπος(T) that a man doeth, (S) whatever a person commitswhatever a person commitsTranslates the indefinite relative clause and anthropos inclusively.grammatical
v19τὸ σῶμα ὑμῶν(T) your bodies, (T) your bodyyour bodyStrictly observes the number shift in the source text between the plural pronoun and the singular noun.grammatical
v19οὗ(T) which, (T) whomwhomUses the personal relative pronoun for the Holy Spirit.interpretive
v20καὶ ἐν τῷ πνεύματι ὑμῶν ἅτινά ἐστιν τοῦ θεοῦ(A) omit the clause based on manuscript evidence, (T) and in your spirit, which are God'sand in your spirit, which are God'sRetains the Byzantine expansion strictly because it is present in the provided source-language text.textual

Limites que vale a pena conhecer

  • This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
  • The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
  • The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
  • The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
  • One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
  • The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
  • Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
  • The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.