← Voltar para Atos 2 · Página completa de estudo de Atos 2
Como o consenso para Atos 2 foi construído
Cada passo do processo, exatamente como foi executado. Nada aqui é editado manualmente: as traduções vieram do banco de dados deste aplicativo, a leitura de cada tradição foi gerada em chamadas isoladas que não veem umas às outras (o isolamento evita a ancoragem; não as torna testemunhas independentes), e o consenso foi sintetizado apenas a partir dessas leituras.
- Modelo:
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)
- Gerado:
- Oct 12, 2026, 12:22 AM UTC
- Method:
- claim-audited, source-language-based, family-weighted
Passo 1Ler a passagem em todas as traduções de domínio público
7 translations, fed to every step. The AI-generated NCB is never a source.
WEB · World English Bible
KJV · King James Version
ASV · American Standard Version
YLT · Young's Literal Translation
Darby · Darby Translation
Webster · Webster Bible
DRC · Douay-Rheims (Challoner)
Passo 2Each eligible tradition reads the chapter — 12 voting profiles across 3 families
Perfis gerados por IA isolados que não veem uns aos outros. Cientes do gênero literário e honestos sobre material escasso.
Ancient Communions · The undivided-church and pre-Reformation episcopal traditions.
Catholicaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Roman Catholic tradition drawing on both Latin AND Eastern Catholic sources — and actually showing the Eastern dimension, not merely promising it: Scripture within Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium (the Catechism, the Latin Fathers, Augustine, Aquinas and the scholastics, the councils) together with the Eastern Catholic churches in communion with Rome and the Greek and Syriac Fathers they share. Sacramental and typological reading. Distinguish teaching shared across the whole Catholic communion from emphases specific to the Latin or to the Eastern Catholic churches.
Significado imediato — Acts 2 narrates the dramatic outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the disciples at Pentecost, manifested by a mighty wind and divided tongues of fire. Empowered by the Spirit, they speak in diverse languages, drawing a bewildered crowd of diaspora Jews. Peter stands with the Eleven to deliver the inaugural Christian proclamation: the phenomenon fulfills Joel's prophecy of the Spirit's outpouring in the last days. Peter preaches the crucifixion, the resurrection, and the exaltation of Jesus of Nazareth, arguing that Davidic psalms concerning the Holy One not seeing corruption were fulfilled not in David, who died and was buried, but in Christ. The crowd, cut to the heart, asks what to do. Peter commands them to repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit. About three thousand are baptized, forming a new community characterized by steadfast adherence to apostolic teaching, communal fellowship, the breaking of bread, and prayers, alongside a radical sharing of material possessions.
Reception — Catholic tradition receives Acts 2 as the public manifestation of the Church, animated by the Holy Spirit. Latin and Eastern Fathers alike contrast Pentecost with the Tower of Babel. Irenaeus and Augustine read the multiplicity of tongues not as confusion, but as the Spirit gathering divided nations into the unity of the one Catholic Church. The Byzantine liturgy encapsulates this typologically: as God once descended to confuse tongues at Babel, He now distributes tongues of fire to call all to unity, a theme prominent in the Kontakia of Romanos the Melodist. The sacramental economy is heavily drawn from this chapter. Peter's command to repent (translated in the Vulgate and Douay-Rheims as 'do penance') and be baptized grounds the Catholic understanding of Baptism and the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins, while the subsequent 'gift of the Holy Spirit' is seen as the biblical basis for the Sacrament of Confirmation. Verse 42 is dogmatically foundational: 'the breaking of bread' is universally recognized by commentators like Bede the Venerable as the Eucharistic sacrifice, anchoring the Church's liturgical life. Furthermore, verses 24 and 27 are crucial for Catholic Christology; Thomas Aquinas cites Peter's use of Psalm 16 to affirm Christ's descent into Hades (the limbo of the Fathers) to deliver the just prior to His resurrection, noting that His flesh did not suffer corruption. John Chrysostom and later Catholic social teaching point to the believers holding all things in common as the ideal of Christian charity and the universal destination of goods.
Application — The Church applies Acts 2 centrally in the Solemnity of Pentecost, one of the highest feast days of the liturgical year. The period of waiting before Pentecost is modeled in the Church's tradition of the Novena to the Holy Spirit. The chapter is continually referenced in the Rite of Confirmation, where the bishop prays for the same outpouring of the Holy Spirit that the apostles received. Furthermore, Acts 2:42 serves as a perpetual blueprint for Catholic parish life and ecclesial renewal, emphasizing that true community requires adherence to the Magisterium (apostolic teaching), the Eucharist (breaking of bread), and liturgical prayer. The radical generosity of the first Christians in verses 44 and 45 is invoked in Catholic Social Teaching and monastic traditions to encourage almsgiving, the preferential option for the poor, and detachment from worldly wealth.
Autoridades citadas:Irenaeus — Against Heresies · Romanos the Melodist — Kontakia · Bede the Venerable — Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles · Thomas Aquinas — Summa Theologiae · John Chrysostom — Homilies on the Acts of the Apostles
auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
- ✓ The gift of tongues at Pentecost reverses the curse of Babel, uniting humanity i
- ✓ The phrase 'breaking of bread' denotes the Eucharistic sacrifice which is centra
- ✓ Christ's soul descended into hell (Hades) to deliver the righteous dead while Hi
- ✓ Peter's exhortation to repent and be baptized establishes the normative sacramen
- ✓ The communal sharing of property serves as a moral imperative for Christian char
- ✓ Acts 2:42 provides the foundational blueprint for Catholic parish life encompass
Eastern Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Eastern Orthodox tradition: Scripture within Holy Tradition and the consensus of the Fathers (patristic consensus). Emphases on theosis, the liturgy, the Septuagint text, apophatic mystery over precise definition, and the seven Ecumenical Councils.
Significado imediato — Acts 2 narrates the coming of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost. The disciples, gathered in one place, experience a sound like a rushing wind and see divided tongues of fire resting upon them. Filled with the Spirit, they speak in diverse languages, drawing a bewildered crowd of diaspora Jews in Jerusalem. Peter preaches to the multitude, interpreting the event as the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy of the Spirit's outpouring in the last days. He proclaims Jesus of Nazareth, whom the people crucified, as the Messiah resurrected by God. Peter proves this by quoting David's Psalms regarding the Christ's escape from Hades and physical decay. He concludes that the exalted Jesus has poured out the Spirit. Cut to the heart, the crowd asks how to respond; Peter commands repentance and baptism for the remission of sins and the gift of the Spirit. About three thousand are baptized, forming a community characterized by steadfast adherence to apostolic teaching, the breaking of bread, prayer, and the radical sharing of possessions.
Reception — In the Eastern Orthodox tradition, Acts 2 is the definitive narrative of the Church's full manifestation in history. The descent of the Holy Spirit (verses 1-4) is not viewed as a one-time historical event, but as the inauguration of the continuous Pentecost that sustains the Church's sacramental life, pouring out uncreated divine energies to make theosis (deification) possible for the faithful. The miracle of speaking in tongues is celebrated as the reversal of the Tower of Babel; as St. Gregory of Nazianzus articulates, whereas God once confused the languages to divide arrogant humanity, the Spirit now distributes tongues to unite the nations in the confession of God's glory (verses 4-11). Orthodox Christology draws heavily on Peter's sermon, particularly his reliance on the Septuagint (LXX) text of Psalm 15 (Masoretic 16). Peter argues that David prophesied the Messiah's soul would not be left in Hades and His flesh would not see 'corruption' (verses 27, 31). St. John Chrysostom emphasizes that this specific Greek term, diaphthora (corruption), anchors the reality of Christ's bodily resurrection and His victorious descent into Hades, demonstrating that death could not hold the Author of Life. The ecclesiology of the chapter is profoundly sacramental and liturgical. Peter’s instruction to be baptized and receive the 'gift of the Holy Spirit' (verse 38) is received as the scriptural pairing of Baptism and Chrismation, where Chrismation functions as the personal Pentecost of every believer. Furthermore, the early church's commitment to 'the breaking of bread and prayers' (verse 42) is identified unequivocally with the Eucharistic Liturgy, the core of Orthodox worship. The radical sharing of goods (verses 44-45) is highlighted by Chrysostom as a model of voluntary poverty and detachment, which became the foundational paradigm for Orthodox monasticism and a perpetual call to almsgiving for all believers.
Application — The narrative of Acts 2 shapes the liturgical peak of the Pentecostarion season. On the Feast of Pentecost, Orthodox parishes are traditionally decorated with green branches and grass, symbolizing the Holy Spirit as the 'Giver of Life.' Following the Divine Liturgy of Pentecost, the Church immediately celebrates the Kneeling Vespers. During this service, the faithful kneel for the first time since Pascha, breaking the festal standing posture to hear profound prayers attributed to St. Basil the Great, which invoke the Holy Spirit for guidance, forgiveness, and rest for the departed (verses 1-4). Additionally, Pentecost marks the return of the ancient prayer 'O Heavenly King, Comforter, the Spirit of Truth' to personal and liturgical use, having been omitted since Pascha. In the continuous sacramental life of the Church, Acts 2 is applied at every initiation; each Chrismation involves the anointing of the newly baptized with the words 'The seal of the gift of the Holy Spirit,' echoing Peter's promise in verse 38 and directly integrating the believer into the Pentecostal reality.
Autoridades citadas:Gregory of Nazianzus — Oration 41 (On Pentecost) · John Chrysostom — Homilies on the Acts of the Apostles · Basil the Great — Kneeling Prayers of Pentecost
auditoria em nível de alegação (7 verificações)
- ✓ The outpouring of the Holy Spirit communicates uncreated divine energies to the
- ✓ The miracle of diverse languages is the antitype and reversal of the Tower of Ba
- ✓ Peter's use of the Septuagint term 'corruption' (diaphthora) demonstrates Christ
- ✓ The command to be baptized and receive the gift of the Holy Spirit establishes t
- ✓ The early community's devotion to the 'breaking of bread and prayers' is underst
- ✓ The radical sharing of possessions functions as a foundational paradigm for Chri
- ✓ The Feast of Pentecost features Kneeling Vespers, where the faithful kneel for t
Oriental Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Oriental Orthodox tradition (Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac): Scripture within the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils and the miaphysite Fathers (Athanasius, Cyril of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch). Deeply liturgical, ascetic, and typological reading; some of these churches hold wider canons.
Significado imediato — Acts 2 describes the arrival of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, manifesting as a violent wind and tongues of fire, which empowers the disciples to speak in diverse languages (vv. 1-4). This attracts a multinational Jewish crowd (vv. 5-13). Peter explains the event as the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy regarding the outpouring of the Spirit (vv. 14-21). He then preaches that the crucified Jesus has been resurrected and exalted by God, fulfilling Davidic prophecy, and is declared both Lord and Christ (vv. 22-36). The crowd's repentance leads to mass baptism, and the chapter concludes by describing the new community's devotion to apostolic teaching, the breaking of bread, prayer, and the communal sharing of all possessions (vv. 37-47).
Reception — The Oriental Orthodox tradition receives this chapter as the inauguration of the Church's sacramental and mystical life, and reads its Christological statements strictly through the lens of the miaphysite Fathers. Acts 2:36 ('God has made him both Lord and Christ') was a crucial battleground during the early Christological controversies. Cyril of Alexandria, in works such as *That Christ is One*, vigorously defends this verse against interpretations that would divide Christ into a human who was 'made' Lord and a divine Word who was eternally Lord. Cyril insists that the title refers to the one incarnate Word in his economic condescension; it is the single, undivided hypostasis of the incarnate Christ who is exalted. Furthermore, Severus of Antioch, in his *Cathedral Homilies*, emphasizes the pneumatological action of Pentecost. He reads the tongues of fire (vv. 3-4) typologically as the divine reversal of the Tower of Babel: where pride once divided human languages, the Holy Spirit now distributes tongues to unite the disparate nations into the one orthodox Church. The 'breaking of bread' (v. 42) is unequivocally received as the Eucharistic sacrifice, marking the enduring center of the Church's communion.
Application — Liturgically, Acts 2 governs the Feast of Pentecost across the Oriental Orthodox communions. In the Coptic and Syriac rites, the chapter provides the foundation for the Prostration (or Kneeling) Prayers performed on Pentecost afternoon, which ritualize the reception of the Holy Spirit and the resumption of kneeling (which is forbidden during the fifty days of Easter). Ethically and ascetically, the description of the early believers in Acts 2:44-45 ('had all things common... sold their possessions') serves as the biblical charter for coenobitic (communal) monasticism. Pachomius, in his *Precepts*, consciously modeled the Egyptian monastic koinonia on this Jerusalem community, transforming the apostolic practice of shared goods and continuous prayer (v. 42) into the enduring ascetic ideal of the Oriental Orthodox monastic tradition.
Autoridades citadas:Cyril of Alexandria — That Christ is One · Severus of Antioch — Cathedral Homilies · Pachomius — Precepts
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ Acts 2:36 refers to the one incarnate Word in his economic condescension, avoidi
- ✓ The distribution of tongues of fire represents the Holy Spirit uniting the natio
- ✓ The 'breaking of bread' is unequivocally identified as the Eucharistic sacrifice
- ✓ The events of Pentecost provide the liturgical foundation for the Prostration (K
- ✓ The communal sharing of possessions by the early believers forms the biblical ch
Reformation Traditions · The magisterial churches of the sixteenth-century Reformation.
Anglican / Episcopalaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Anglican tradition (including the Episcopal Church): Scripture read with tradition and reason (Hooker); the Book of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles; a comprehensiveness spanning evangelical, anglo-catholic, and broad/progressive readings — name that spectrum where the passage has been read across it.
Significado imediato — Acts 2 narrates the fulfillment of the promise of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. The chapter begins with the disciples gathered together when a violent wind and tongues of fire descend upon them, filling them with the Spirit and enabling them to speak in unlearned languages (vv. 1-4). This attracts a diverse crowd of diaspora Jews in Jerusalem, who are bewildered to hear the mighty works of God declared in their native tongues (vv. 5-13). Peter stands to interpret the event, refuting charges of drunkenness and identifying the phenomenon as the eschatological outpouring of the Spirit prophesied by Joel (vv. 14-21). He then preaches the first Christian sermon, proclaiming that Jesus of Nazareth, whom they crucified, was raised by God and exalted as Lord and Messiah, fulfilling Davidic prophecies from the Psalms (vv. 22-36). Pierced to the heart, the crowd asks how to respond, and Peter calls them to repent and be baptized for the forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit, noting the promise is for them and their children (vv. 37-40). Three thousand are baptized, and the chapter concludes with a summary of the nascent church's common life: devotion to the apostles' teaching, fellowship, the breaking of bread, prayers, and the radical sharing of material possessions (vv. 41-47).
Reception — The Anglican reception of Acts 2 reflects the tradition's defining comprehensiveness, with various wings of the church drawing heavily on different facets of the chapter. For the Anglican mainstream and the ecumenical movement, verse 42 ('the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers') is foundational. William Reed Huntington identified these four elements as the primitive, irreducible marks of the Catholic Church, a vision that directly shaped the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral as the Anglican basis for global Christian unity. Broad Church theologians like F.D. Maurice read the Pentecost narrative (vv. 1-11) as the theological constitution of a universal human fellowship, arguing that the Spirit's descent and the gift of tongues reversed the fragmentation of Babel and established a spiritual kingdom meant to encompass all nations. Evangelical Anglicans, such as John Stott, place strong emphasis on Peter's sermon and the resulting conversions (vv. 14-41), reading Acts 2 as a model for Word-and-Spirit ministry where apostolic doctrine directly produces vibrant, repentant communities. Meanwhile, the Anglo-Catholic wing and Anglican Christian Socialists have historically highlighted the communal economy of the early church (vv. 44-45). They view the selling of possessions and distribution according to need not as a temporary historical anomaly, but as a binding critique of modern capitalist individualism and a mandate for Christian social action. Finally, verses 38-39 are traditionally marshaled in Anglican apologetics to defend the practice of infant baptism; the assurance that the promise is 'unto you, and to your children' aligns with Article XXVII of the Thirty-Nine Articles, which maintains that the baptism of young children is agreeable with the institution of Christ.
Application — Acts 2 is primarily applied through the liturgical calendar and the rites of Christian initiation. It provides the central appointed readings for the Feast of Pentecost (Whitsunday) in the Book of Common Prayer, celebrating the birth of the Church and the empowering of the Holy Spirit. Most distinctively, verse 42 is enshrined in the liturgical life of the modern Episcopal Church and other Anglican provinces as the heart of the Baptismal Covenant. Candidates (or their sponsors) are explicitly asked, 'Will you continue in the apostles' teaching and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in the prayers?' By turning this descriptive verse into a prescriptive vow, the tradition applies the earliest portrait of the Jerusalem church as the normative baseline for the ongoing daily life of every baptized Anglican.
Autoridades citadas:William Reed Huntington — The Church-Idea: An Essay Towards Unity · F.D. Maurice — The Kingdom of Christ · John Stott — The Message of Acts · The Episcopal Church — The Book of Common Prayer (1979)
auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
- ✓ The gift of tongues at Pentecost establishes a universal spiritual fellowship th
- ✓ Peter's sermon establishes that true Spirit-filled revival is inextricably linke
- ✓ The promise of the Holy Spirit to 'your children' provides scriptural warrant fo
- ✓ The early church's fourfold devotion is the irreducible framework for Catholic a
- ✓ The communal sharing of wealth in the early church serves as a mandate for Chris
- ✓ The description of the early church's common life is used as the foundational vo
Lutheranaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Lutheran tradition (the Book of Concord): the law–gospel distinction, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura held with the ecumenical creeds, the theology of the cross, and sacramental realism.
Significado imediato — The narrative of Acts 2 records the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. The Spirit's descent is marked by the sound of a rushing wind and the appearance of divided tongues of fire, enabling the apostles to speak in unlearned foreign languages to the bewildered diaspora Jews gathered in Jerusalem. Peter addresses the crowd, interpreting the event as the fulfillment of Joel’s eschatological prophecy. He preaches the life, crucifixion, and resurrection of Jesus, utilizing Psalms 16 and 110 to prove that Jesus is the prophesied Messiah and exalted Lord. Convicted by this preaching, the crowd asks what they must do. Peter commands them to repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit, extending this promise to them and their children. About three thousand are baptized. The chapter concludes by describing the life of the nascent Christian community, characterized by steadfast devotion to the apostles' teaching, the breaking of bread, prayers, and a voluntary, radical sharing of possessions.
Reception — Lutheran reception of Acts 2 is profoundly shaped by the tradition's emphasis on the distinction between Law and Gospel, the means of grace, and sacramental realism. First, Peter’s sermon is viewed as the paradigm for preaching. C.F.W. Walther highlights verses 37–38 to demonstrate how the Law must be applied in its full severity—accusing the hearers of murdering the Messiah to the point that they are 'cut to the heart' (producing terrores conscientiae, or terrors of conscience)—before the sweet Gospel of grace and remission of sins can be offered. Second, the explicit pairing of Baptism with the forgiveness of sins and the Holy Spirit in verse 38, combined with the promise extending to 'your children' in verse 39, serves as a primary confessional locus for infant baptism. Philip Melanchthon, in the Apology of the Augsburg Confession, argues that because this promise of grace belongs to infants, they too must be baptized to receive it. Third, against 'enthusiasts' who seek the Holy Spirit apart from external means, Lutheran theology points out that the Spirit does not work independently of the Word; the Spirit's descent immediately yields the external, preached Word, and the three thousand receive the Spirit specifically through the external sacrament of Baptism. Finally, the description of the early church in verse 42—gathered around the apostles' teaching and the breaking of bread—informs the Lutheran understanding of the marks of the Church (Word and Sacrament). The communal sharing of goods (vv. 44-45) is understood as a voluntary exercise of Christian love in one's vocation, rather than a divine mandate abolishing private property or elevating communal monasticism.
Application — In application, Acts 2 is the central text for Pentecost Sunday, directing the congregation's focus to the Holy Spirit's ongoing work through the external 'means of grace.' Pastors are taught to model their preaching strictly after Peter’s: delivering the Law to crush self-righteousness, followed immediately by the pure Gospel of Christ's forgiveness. In catechesis and pastoral care, verses 38–39 are frequently utilized to assure parents of the baptismal regeneration of their infants. Furthermore, verse 42 shapes the Lutheran understanding of parish life and liturgy, emphasizing that the local church is not a mere social organization, but an assembly constituted by and gathered around the pure preaching of the Word and the right administration of the Lord’s Supper.
Autoridades citadas:C.F.W. Walther — The Proper Distinction Between Law and Gospel · Philip Melanchthon — Apology of the Augsburg Confession · Martin Luther — Church Postil
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ Peter's sermon exemplifies the proper distinction of Law and Gospel, where accus
- ✓ The promise of the Holy Spirit extending to children mandates the baptism of inf
- ✓ The early church's devotion to the apostles' teaching and the breaking of bread
- ✓ The sharing of possessions among believers was a voluntary act of Christian love
- ✓ The Holy Spirit works to create faith not through internal enthusiasm, but throu
Reformed / Presbyterianaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Reformed tradition (Calvin; the Westminster Standards; the Heidelberg and Belgic confessions): the sovereignty of God and covenant theology, a redemptive-historical reading of Scripture, and the regulative principle.
Significado imediato — In its immediate narrative context, Acts 2 records the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost, marked by wind, fire, and the miraculous speaking of unlearned languages. Peter delivers the first major apostolic sermon, interpreting these events as the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy regarding the last days. He proclaims that Jesus of Nazareth, though crucified by wicked men, was delivered up by God's set plan, resurrected as prophesied by David, and exalted to the right hand of God as Lord and Christ. Struck to the heart, the crowd asks how to respond, to which Peter commands repentance and baptism, resulting in three thousand converts. The chapter concludes by describing the vibrant, communal life of the early church, characterized by devotion to apostolic teaching, fellowship, breaking of bread, prayer, and shared resources.
Reception — The Reformed tradition reads Acts 2 through several foundational lenses, making it one of the most heavily cited chapters in Reformed theology. First, through a redemptive-historical lens, Pentecost is understood not as a repeatable paradigm for individual spiritual experience (a 'second blessing'), but as a unique, epochal event in salvation history inaugurating the new covenant era. Richard Gaffin's 'Perspectives on Pentecost' emphasizes this once-for-all transition. Second, the chapter is a cornerstone for Reformed compatibilism and the sovereignty of God. John Calvin, in his 'Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles', and the Westminster Confession of Faith (Chapters 3 and 5) rely heavily on verse 23 to demonstrate that God's 'determinate counsel and foreknowledge' ordains whatsoever comes to pass, even the sinful crucifixion of Christ, without God becoming the author of sin or violating the will of the 'lawless men' who executed it. Third, covenant theology anchors its defense of paedobaptism (infant baptism) on verse 39. The declaration that 'the promise is to you and to your children' is seen as an explicit New Testament continuation of the Abrahamic covenant principle, where the children of believers are included in the visible church and are rightful recipients of the covenant sign, a doctrine enshrined in the Westminster Confession (Chapter 28) and the Heidelberg Catechism. Finally, the regulative principle of worship and Reformed ecclesiology look to verse 42 as the normative blueprint for corporate worship. The elements listed—the apostles' teaching (preaching of the Word), fellowship, the breaking of bread (sacraments), and prayers—are identified as the ordinary means of grace around which the church is to be structured.
Application — In application, Reformed pastors frequently invoke Acts 2:23 in pastoral care to offer comfort in the face of tragedy or evil, assuring congregants that God remains sovereign over the darkest events, just as He was over the crucifixion. Acts 2:39 is liturgically woven into baptismal services; ministers explicitly recite it when baptizing infants to assure parents and the congregation of God's covenantal faithfulness across generations. Acts 2:42 serves as the practical template for church planting and weekly liturgy, reminding churches to prioritize the ordinary means of grace—Word, sacraments, and prayer—over novel or pragmatic methods of church growth.
Autoridades citadas:John Calvin — Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles · Westminster Assembly — Westminster Confession of Faith · Richard Gaffin — Perspectives on Pentecost · Westminster Assembly — Westminster Confession of Faith
auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
- ✓ The crucifixion of Christ was executed by lawless men who are culpable for their
- ✓ The promise of the Holy Spirit and salvation is extended covenantally to believe
- ✓ The normative practices of the gathered church consist of devotion to the Word,
- ✓ The outpouring of the Spirit with tongues of fire was the fulfillment of Joel's
Free-Church & Revival Traditions · Believers'-church, revival, and restorationist movements.
Baptistaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Baptist tradition (e.g. the 1689 Second London Confession, the Baptist Faith & Message — note the range): believers' baptism, congregational polity, liberty of conscience, a memorial reading of the ordinances, and strong emphasis on personal conversion and biblical authority.
Significado imediato — The narrative describes the descent of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, marked by the sound of a rushing wind and divided tongues of fire. The disciples speak in unlearned foreign languages, drawing a bewildered crowd of diaspora Jews. Peter preaches a sermon contextualizing the event as the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy. He indicts the crowd for crucifying Jesus, whom God raised from the dead and exalted as Lord and Christ, fulfilling Davidic psalms. Cut to the heart, the crowd asks how to respond. Peter commands repentance and baptism in the name of Jesus for the remission of sins. About three thousand receive the word, are baptized, and form a radically new community devoted to the apostles' teaching, fellowship, the breaking of bread, prayer, and mutual provision.
Reception — In the Baptist tradition, Acts 2 is a cornerstone text for ecclesiology and the ordinances. Verses 38 through 41 are universally heralded as the biblical mandate for credobaptism (believers' baptism) and regenerate church membership. The sequence in verse 41—receiving the word, being baptized, and then being added to the church—is read as the normative pattern for Christian initiation and local church polity. The 1689 Second London Confession relies on this sequence to argue that visible churches are composed strictly of visible saints who have professed personal faith. Baptists historically engage in vigorous polemics over verse 39. Where pedobaptist traditions read the promise to 'children' as a continuation of the Abrahamic covenant justifying infant baptism, Baptist theologians like John Gill stress the concluding clause, 'even as many as the Lord our God shall call.' Thus, the promise is restricted to the elect who experience effectual calling, regardless of physical parentage. Furthermore, Baptists firmly reject baptismal regeneration in verse 38; theologians argue that 'for the remission of sins' means 'with reference to' or 'because of' the remission of sins already granted upon repentance, guarding the doctrine of justification by faith alone.
Application — Baptists apply this chapter as the definitive blueprint for the local church and evangelistic mission. Peter's sermon serves as a model for gospel proclamation: Christ-centered, scripturally saturated, and demanding a personal response of repentance. In local church practice, Acts 2:42 provides the foundational elements for gathered worship: expository preaching, covenant fellowship, the Lord's Supper, and corporate prayer. Pastors frequently appeal to this chapter to exhort new believers to obey the command to be baptized immediately as a public profession of faith, and to challenge congregations to maintain the evangelistic zeal and sacrificial generosity characteristic of the first church in Jerusalem.
Autoridades citadas:John Gill — Exposition of the New Testament · Second London Baptist Confession — 1689 Second London Baptist Confession of Faith · Mark Dever — Nine Marks of a Healthy Church
auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
- ✓ The Holy Spirit descends at Pentecost, enabling the disciples to speak in unlear
- ✓ Peter preaches that Jesus' death and resurrection fulfill Davidic prophecy, lead
- ✓ The normative pattern for entering the visible church is personal reception of t
- ✓ The promise given to 'children' is explicitly conditioned by the phrase 'as many
- ✓ Baptism is performed as a memorial and public testimony of the remission of sins
- ✓ The local church is to structure its gathered life around biblical teaching, fel
Methodist / Wesleyan / Holinessaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Wesleyan-Holiness tradition: prevenient grace and free response, sanctification and entire sanctification / Christian perfection, the Wesleyan quadrilateral (Scripture primary, with tradition, reason, and experience), and warm-hearted practical piety.
Significado imediato — Acts 2 narrates the descent of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost (vv. 1-4), causing the disciples to speak in diverse languages (vv. 5-13). Peter preaches to the bewildered crowd, framing the event as the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy regarding the Spirit's outpouring (vv. 14-21) and proclaiming the crucified and resurrected Jesus as Lord and Christ (vv. 22-36). The crowd's deep conviction leads to the baptism of three thousand (vv. 37-41), who subsequently form a devoted community characterized by apostolic teaching, fellowship, shared possessions, and joyful worship (vv. 42-47).
Reception — The Wesleyan and Holiness traditions view Acts 2 as a foundational text for pneumatology, ecclesiology, and the doctrine of entire sanctification. John Wesley, in his Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament, saw the crowd being 'pricked in their heart' (v. 37) as the quintessential operation of awakening grace, leading to repentance and justification. Furthermore, Wesley viewed the communal life described in verses 42-47 not as a temporary economic experiment, but as the enduring model for 'social holiness,' directly inspiring the Methodist class meetings and bands aimed at mutual accountability and practical piety. John Fletcher, in his Checks to Antinomianism, made a critical theological maneuver by identifying the Pentecostal baptism of the Holy Spirit (vv. 1-4) with the believer's subsequent experience of entire sanctification, arguing that believers must seek their own personal 'Pentecost' to be cleansed from inward sin and empowered for holy living. Later, in the 19th-century Holiness movement, Phoebe Palmer utilized Peter's quotation of Joel in verses 17-18 ('your daughters shall prophesy') in her work The Promise of the Father to fiercely defend the right of women to preach, arguing that the Pentecostal outpouring permanently removed gender barriers to public ministry. The tradition notably emphasizes the sanctifying power of the Spirit over the charism of glossolalia, distinguishing its reading from later Pentecostalism.
Application — The tradition applies Acts 2 by continually calling believers to seek a personal 'baptism with the Holy Spirit' for entire sanctification and empowerment for witness. In church governance and practice, verses 17-18 are actively invoked to support the ordination and public ministry of women. The description of the early church in verses 42-47 is applied through the maintenance of small-group structures for intense spiritual fellowship, accountability, and the shared distribution of resources to care for the poor, reflecting the warm-hearted practical piety and social holiness demanded by the passage.
Autoridades citadas:John Wesley — Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament · John Fletcher — Checks to Antinomianism · Phoebe Palmer — The Promise of the Father
auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
- ✓ The conviction of the crowd demonstrates the initial work of awakening and preve
- ✓ The early church's devotion to fellowship and shared life serves as the blueprin
- ✓ The outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost represents the paradigm for a bel
- ✓ The prophetic outpouring upon 'daughters' and 'handmaidens' provides the biblica
Anabaptist / Mennoniteaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Anabaptist tradition (Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite): a Jesus-centered reading with the Sermon on the Mount as normative, believers' baptism, nonviolence and nonresistance, simple living, communal discernment, and the church as a visible community distinct from worldly power.
Significado imediato — Acts 2 narrates the descent of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, enabling the disciples to speak in diverse languages. Peter explains this event as the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy and preaches the crucified and resurrected Jesus as Lord and Christ. The crowd's conviction leads to the baptism of about three thousand people. The chapter concludes with a summary of the early church's life, characterized by devotion to apostolic teaching, shared meals, prayer, and a radical economic solidarity where believers held all things in common to care for anyone in need.
Reception — The Anabaptist tradition receives Acts 2 as a foundational blueprint for ecclesiology, particularly concerning believers' baptism and the socio-economic nature of the church. Acts 2:38 is a primary text against infant baptism; historical Anabaptist leaders like Menno Simons argued that Peter's sequence—preaching, hearing, conviction, repentance, and finally baptism—establishes a normative chronological order that requires a conscious, mature response. Furthermore, the description of the early church in verses 42-47 is viewed not as a temporary phase but as the permanent, visible manifestation of the Spirit's work. The Hutterite branch, articulated by Peter Riedemann, reads verses 44-45 as a mandate for the absolute community of goods, arguing that true spiritual unity necessitates the abolition of private property among believers. Meanwhile, other Anabaptist groups (Mennonites, Brethren) read these same verses as a binding ethic of mutual aid, where private ownership remains but is entirely subordinated to the needs of the community. Peter's exhortation to be saved from a 'crooked generation' (verse 40) anchors the tradition's emphasis on the church as an alternative, non-conformed society separate from worldly powers.
Application — Anabaptist communities apply Acts 2 by structuring church life around voluntary adult commitment and material sharing. Baptismal candidates undergo instruction and are baptized only upon a public confession of faith and repentance, mirroring the conscious response of the Pentecost crowd. Economically, the text is literally applied by Hutterite and Bruderhof communities through communal living, shared purses, and the rejection of private property. In Mennonite and Brethren congregations, verses 44-47 are applied through extensive mutual aid networks, healthcare sharing ministries, disaster relief programs, and a commitment to simple living. The 'breaking of bread' (verse 46) is practiced both in the Lord's Supper and through frequent fellowship meals, reinforcing the egalitarian and peaceable nature of the gathered body.
Autoridades citadas:Menno Simons — Foundation of Christian Doctrine · Peter Riedemann — Account of Our Religion, Doctrine and Faith · Michael Sattler — Schleitheim Confession
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ The sequence of hearing, feeling conviction, repenting, and being baptized estab
- ✓ The command to save oneself from a crooked generation defines the church as a vi
- ✓ The early church's practice of selling possessions to distribute to those in nee
- ✓ Hutterite and Bruderhof communities literally practice the pooling of all posses
- ✓ Baptism is administered only to those who consciously and gladly receive the pre
Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal tradition (Assemblies of God, Church of God, and kindred bodies): the present continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine healing, and expectancy of God's present action, read within Nicene Trinitarian faith. Do NOT attribute Word-of-Faith / prosperity or later neo-charismatic distinctives to classical Pentecostalism generally.
Significado imediato — Luke narrates the fulfillment of the promised Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. The chapter describes an atmospheric theophany—a sound like a mighty rushing wind and divided tongues like fire—culminating in the disciples being filled with the Holy Spirit and speaking in unlearned languages as the Spirit gives utterance (Acts 2:1-4). This phenomenon draws a diverse diaspora crowd. Peter interprets the event not as drunkenness, but as the inauguration of the eschatological 'last days' prophesied by Joel, wherein the Spirit is democratized across all flesh, transcending age, gender, and social status (Acts 2:15-21). Peter roots this outpouring in the life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus of Nazareth (Acts 2:22-32). Exalted to God’s right hand, the vindicated Christ receives the Spirit from the Father and pours it out (Acts 2:33). Convicted by this proclamation, the crowd asks how to respond. Peter commands repentance and baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, promising that they too will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit, a promise extending to all future generations (Acts 2:38-39). The chapter concludes with the formation of a radically generous, unified community devoted to apostolic teaching, fellowship, breaking of bread, prayer, and the ongoing manifestation of apostolic signs and wonders (Acts 2:42-47).
Reception — For Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalism, Acts 2 is the foundational scriptural locus for its theological identity. The tradition centers on Acts 2:4, reading the event not merely as unrepeatable salvation-history, but as the normative paradigm for all believers. The experience of being 'filled with the Holy Spirit' is understood as distinct from and subsequent to the regenerating work of the Spirit in salvation (the doctrine of subsequence). Furthermore, speaking in tongues is identified as the 'initial physical evidence' of this baptism. Early Pentecostal pioneers, such as Charles Parham and William J. Seymour, saw Acts 2 as proof that the apostolic faith was being restored in the modern era. The quotation of Joel (Acts 2:16-21) provides the tradition's eschatological framework: the church operates in the 'latter rain' of the last days, expecting universal prophetic empowerment across gender, race, and class lines. The tradition strictly reads the chapter through a Nicene Trinitarian lens, frequently utilizing Acts 2:33 to emphasize the distinct yet unified operations of the Godhead: the Father promises, the exalted Son mediates, and the Holy Spirit is poured out. Pentecostal theologians like Roger Stronstad and Stanley Horton have utilized Acts 2 to argue that Luke possesses his own distinct pneumatology—one of vocational empowerment for mission—that must not be collapsed into Pauline soteriology. While there is internal debate regarding whether speaking in tongues is the *exclusive* initial evidence (with some European Pentecostals and newer charismatic groups allowing for other prophetic signs), classical bodies like the Assemblies of God and the Church of God remain firmly anchored to the Acts 2:4 paradigm.
Application — In Pentecostal practice, Acts 2 dictates the expectation that God acts directly and miraculously in the present day. Believers are actively encouraged to 'tarry' or seek the baptism in the Holy Spirit, anticipating that they will speak in tongues just as the disciples did (Acts 2:4). Pastors preach Acts 2:38-39 as a guarantee that the Pentecostal experience was not confined to the apostolic age but is available 'to you and to your children, and to all who are far off.' The chapter also serves as the blueprint for the local church. Pentecostal ecclesiology strives to replicate the community of Acts 2:42-47, holding an expectancy that 'many wonders and signs' (Acts 2:43) will accompany the preaching of the Word. Divine healing, deliverance, and exuberant, Spirit-led worship are pursued as the natural continuation of the Acts 2 community's daily life.
Autoridades citadas:Charles Fox Parham — Kol Kare Bomidbar: A Voice Crying in the Wilderness · William J. Seymour — The Apostolic Faith · Assemblies of God General Council — Statement of Fundamental Truths · Stanley M. Horton — The Book of Acts · Roger Stronstad — The Charismatic Theology of St. Luke
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ The disciples speaking in tongues as the Spirit gave utterance establishes the n
- ✓ The fulfillment of Joel's prophecy inaugurates the 'last days,' marked by a demo
- ✓ The outpouring of the Spirit is a Trinitarian event wherein the exalted Son rece
- ✓ The promise of the Holy Spirit is not limited to the first century but is explic
- ✓ The early church community models the expected normal Christian life, which incl
Seventh-day Adventistaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Seventh-day Adventist tradition: the seventh-day Sabbath, the great-controversy theme, conditional immortality, sanctuary theology, and a historicist reading of prophecy.
Significado imediato — Acts 2 describes the descent of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost, manifesting as a rushing wind, divided tongues of fire, and the miraculous ability to speak foreign languages. Peter preaches to the bewildered Jewish diaspora, framing the event as the fulfillment of Joel's end-times prophecy. He interprets Jesus' resurrection and exaltation through the psalms of David, proving that Jesus is both Lord and Christ. The chapter concludes with the conviction of the crowd, three thousand baptisms, and a depiction of the early church's devotion, unity, and shared communal life.
Reception — The Seventh-day Adventist tradition reads Acts 2 through several of its distinctive theological lenses, particularly conditional immortality and a historicist approach to prophecy. Foremost is its support for the unconscious state of the dead (soul sleep). In 'The Great Controversy', Ellen G. White highlights Peter's explicit statements that David 'is both dead and buried' and 'is not ascended into the heavens' (Acts 2:29, 34) to forcefully refute the doctrine of the natural immortality of the soul, arguing that the righteous wait in the grave until the resurrection. Furthermore, Peter's citation of Joel regarding celestial signs—the sun turning into darkness and the moon into blood (Acts 2:19-20)—is read historicistically. White and Adventist pioneers mapped these exact signs to the Dark Day of May 19, 1780, and the subsequent appearance of the moon as blood, viewing them as fulfilled historical milestones heralding the approaching Second Advent. Additionally, the Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary utilizes Acts 2:4-11 to define the biblical gift of tongues strictly as the miraculous speaking of actual, unlearned human languages for cross-cultural evangelism, establishing a safeguard against modern charismatic movements that promote ecstatic utterances.
Application — Adventists apply Acts 2 as a vital template for eschatological expectation and mission. Drawing on Ellen G. White's 'The Acts of the Apostles', the tradition views the Pentecostal outpouring as the 'early rain' of the Holy Spirit. Consequently, the church applies this chapter by actively praying for and anticipating a corresponding 'latter rain' of the Spirit to empower the final global proclamation of the three angels' messages before Christ's return. Peter's call to 'repent, and be baptized' (Acts 2:38) is heavily featured in evangelistic crusades. Finally, the communal devotion, generosity, and unity of the early believers (Acts 2:42-47) are consistently held up as the standard for local Adventist congregations seeking to reflect the character of Christ amid the great controversy.
Autoridades citadas:Ellen G. White — The Great Controversy · Ellen G. White — The Acts of the Apostles · Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, Volume 6 — Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ Peter's assertion that David is dead, buried, and has not ascended into the heav
- ✓ The prophetic signs of the sun turning to darkness and the moon to blood were hi
- ✓ The manifestation of tongues at Pentecost consisted of intelligible, known human
- ✓ The Pentecostal event constitutes the 'early rain' of the Holy Spirit, which the
- ✓ The early church's practice of holding all things in common and dedicating thems
Restorationist / Churches of Christaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Restoration Movement tradition (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches — formally non-creedal): restore New Testament Christianity, 'speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent,' reading by direct command, apostolic example, and necessary inference; baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; the weekly Lord's Supper.
Significado imediato — Acts 2 narrates the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the apostles on the day of Pentecost, manifesting in speaking in unlearned languages. Peter preaches the first gospel sermon, explaining this event as the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy and David's psalms. He proclaims that Jesus, whom the crowd crucified, has been resurrected and exalted as Lord and Christ. When the convicted crowd asks how to respond, Peter commands them to repent and be baptized for the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit. About three thousand are baptized, forming a new community characterized by steadfast devotion to the apostles' teaching, fellowship, the breaking of bread, prayer, and mutual care, with the Lord continually adding the saved to their number.
Reception — In the Restoration Movement tradition, Acts 2 is arguably the most defining chapter in scripture, frequently described as the 'hub of the Bible' or the 'Jerusalem starting point.' It is read as the historical establishment of the New Testament church and the kingdom of God on earth. The tradition places paramount importance on Acts 2:38, reading the Greek preposition 'eis' ('for' or 'unto' the remission of sins) as prospective, indicating that baptism by immersion is the precise moment when God forgives sins. J.W. McGarvey championed this grammatical and theological reading against Protestant interpretations that viewed baptism as merely symbolic of an already-achieved salvation. Walter Scott utilized the sequence of Acts 2:38 to formalize a logical 'plan of salvation' that became a hallmark of the movement's evangelism. Acts 2:42 is interpreted through the hermeneutic of 'apostolic pattern' or 'approved example.' Alexander Campbell and subsequent leaders argued that 'breaking of bread' refers to the Lord's Supper, and the disciples' steadfast continuation establishes the binding precedent for weekly observance. Furthermore, Acts 2:47 heavily informs Restoration ecclesiology: T.W. Brents and others emphasized that God Himself adds the saved to the universal church, thereby precluding the concept of 'joining' human denominations.
Application — The Churches of Christ apply Acts 2 as the definitive blueprint for both individual conversion and congregational life. Evangelistic sermons almost invariably culminate in the commands of Acts 2:38, calling listeners to faith, repentance, and immediate baptism by immersion for the forgiveness of sins. In worship, congregations trace their practice of weekly communion and autonomous fellowship directly back to the pattern established in Acts 2:42. The chapter is appealed to constantly to justify the goal of restoring New Testament Christianity by 'speaking where the Bible speaks,' aiming to replicate the purity, structure, and terms of admission of this original Pentecost church.
Autoridades citadas:J.W. McGarvey — Original Commentary on Acts · Walter Scott — The Gospel Restored · Alexander Campbell — The Christian System · T.W. Brents — The Gospel Plan of Salvation
auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
- ✓ The church and the kingdom of God were formally established on the day of Pentec
- ✓ Baptism is a necessary condition prior to receiving the forgiveness of sins and
- ✓ The 'breaking of bread' refers to the Lord's Supper, and its inclusion in the ap
- ✓ Church membership is not a secondary choice but is granted simultaneously with s
- ✓ Evangelistic invitations must instruct sinners to repent and be baptized in orde
- ✓ Local church assemblies must include teaching, fellowship, communion, and prayer
Passo 3Painéis sem direito a voto e apêndice comparativo
Estes fundamentam as notas e a tradução, e são relatados aqui, mas nunca são contabilizados na votação.
Academic textual-historical analysisaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Academic textual-historical analysis: philology and the original-language text, textual criticism, ancient Near Eastern (and, for the NT, Greco-Roman) context, literary genre and form, composition and dating debates, and reception history. Describe scholarly positions and their evidence without confessional commitment. This panel informs the textual notes and the rendering; it is never a church vote.
Significado imediato — Scholars classify Acts 2 as Hellenistic historiography, featuring a dramatic narrative followed by an extensive, programmatic speech. The setting is the Jewish festival of Pentecost. The phenomena of wind and fire draw on ancient Near Eastern theophanic imagery (vv. 2-3). The catalogue of nations (vv. 9-11) functions as an ethnographic map of the known world, which scholars note closely parallels ancient astrological and geographical lists. Philologically, the narrative explicitly describes xenolalia, speaking in recognizable foreign languages (vv. 4, 6, 8), differentiating it from the unintelligible glossolalia described elsewhere in early Christian literature. Peter's speech is widely analyzed as a composition by the author, fitting the Thucydidean model of historiography where speeches articulate the theological meaning of events. The exegesis in the speech relies heavily on the Septuagint. For instance, the use of Psalm 16 in verses 25-28 turns on the Greek word diaphthora (corruption or decay), whereas the underlying Hebrew text refers to a pit or grave. This Greek-based wordplay indicates that the speech was composed in Greek rather than being a transcript of an Aramaic original.
Reception — In critical scholarship, the Pentecost narrative is primarily understood as the author's theological etiology for the church and the Gentile mission. Historical-critical analysis frequently explores the tradition history behind the narrative. Scholars identify major conceptual backgrounds for the text, most notably Jewish traditions surrounding the giving of the Law at Sinai. Later rabbinic and Hellenistic Jewish traditions describe the Sinai event as being promulgated with visible fire and voices distributing into the languages of the world. While earlier scholarship often viewed the narrative purely as a reversal of Babel, modern textual analysis emphasizes these early Jewish festival traditions. Scholars generally view the chapter as a highly developed theological construct reflecting a late first-century context, blending Jewish apocalyptic eschatology (as seen in the modification of Joel's prophecy in verses 17-21) with Hellenistic literary forms.
Application — In academic practice, this chapter is utilized to reconstruct the social, historical, and linguistic realities of early Christianity, as well as the ideological agenda of the text's author. The summary of the early community in verses 42-47 is heavily scrutinized by social historians. The description of having all things in common is frequently analyzed as an adaptation of Greco-Roman utopian and Pythagorean ideals, synthesized with Jewish traditions of almsgiving and community solidarity. Scholars debate the historical reality of this economic arrangement, with many viewing it as an idealized summary meant to portray the early church as the fulfillment of both Jewish ethical demands and Hellenistic philosophical ideals of true friendship, noting its rapid disappearance in the broader historical record of the early Jesus movement.
Autoridades citadas:Stefan Weinstock — The Geographical Catalogue in Acts II, 9-11 · Ernst Haenchen — The Acts of the Apostles · Craig S. Keener — Acts: An Exegetical Commentary · Hans Conzelmann — Acts of the Apostles
auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
- ✓ The catalogue of nations resembles ancient astrological and geographical lists m
- ✓ Peter's speech relies on the Greek Septuagint translation, notably the word diap
- ✓ The narrative of fire and distributed languages draws on Jewish traditions of th
- ✓ The communal sharing of property reflects Greco-Roman utopian and Pythagorean id
Jewish interpretationaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Jewish interpretation of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible books only; do not treat the New Testament as Scripture, and address it only historically if at all). Distinguish rabbinic (Talmud, Midrash), medieval (Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and the classical mefarshim), and modern (including critical and denominational) voices rather than presenting one uniform Jewish position. This panel informs, and is reported, but never a Christian church vote.
Significado imediato — Acts is a New Testament text and therefore holds no canonical status in Judaism. Historically, Jewish readers approach Acts 2 as a first-century document describing a Jewish sectarian community during Shavuot (Pentecost), one of the three major biblical pilgrimage festivals. The text's catalog of nations (vv. 9–11) is recognized by modern Jewish historians as a valuable record of the geographic extent and linguistic diversity of the Jewish Diaspora and proselytes in the late Second Temple period. The hermeneutical methods the text attributes to Peter—reinterpreting prophetic and poetic texts to apply to contemporary events and figures—are seen as analogous to the pesher interpretations found in the Dead Sea Scrolls and early rabbinic midrash, though applied toward conclusions that normative Judaism rejected.
Reception — Because Acts 2 relies heavily on quotations from the Hebrew Bible to validate its claims, the chapter became a focal point for medieval Jewish-Christian polemics. Jewish exegetes actively refuted the Christological readings of the Tanakh presented in the speech. Regarding the quotation of Joel (vv. 17–21), Jewish commentators such as David Kimhi (Radak) maintained that the promised outpouring of the Divine Spirit is strictly an eschatological event belonging to the future Messianic era, which will be characterized by universal peace and the restoration of Israel—conditions they argue were not met in the first century. Furthermore, the speech's use of Psalm 16 to argue for a resurrected Messiah whose flesh does not see corruption (vv. 25–31) was explicitly countered. Radak and other polemicists argued that Psalm 16 is a psalm of David expressing his personal trust that God would protect him from premature death and physical harm, rather than a prophecy about a messiah dying and rising. Similarly, the use of Psalm 110 to depict Jesus ascending to the right hand of God (vv. 34–35) was rejected. Classical Jewish commentators, including Rashi, interpreted the 'lord' in Psalm 110:1 as referring either to Abraham (drawing on rabbinic tradition in the Talmud) or to King David himself, rather than to an exalted messianic deity in heaven.
Application — As a New Testament text, Acts 2 has no liturgical, theological, or devotional application within Judaism. It is engaged almost exclusively by Jewish historians reconstructing the origins of the early Jewish Jesus-movement, and by apologists and polemicists defending traditional Jewish readings of the Hebrew Bible against Christian supersessionist claims.
Autoridades citadas:David Kimhi (Radak) — Commentary on Joel · David Kimhi (Radak) — Commentary on Psalms · Rashi — Commentary on Psalms
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ The narrative setting of the chapter reflects the Jewish pilgrimage festival of
- ✓ Jewish commentators reject the claim that Joel's prophecy was fulfilled at Pente
- ✓ Medieval Jewish polemicists countered the Christological reading of Psalm 16, ar
- ✓ The application of Psalm 110 to an exalted heavenly Lord is refuted by Jewish ex
- ✓ The chapter is not considered Scripture and has no liturgical or devotional use
Apêndice comparativo — fora da lista niceno-trinitariana (Latter-day Saint, Jehovah's Witnesses)
Latter-day Saint
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Latter-day Saint reading (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints): the Bible read alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, with living prophets and continuing revelation, and the Joseph Smith Translation where relevant. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Significado imediato — Acts 2 narrates the events of Pentecost, where the Holy Spirit descends upon the apostles, manifesting as cloven tongues of fire and empowering them to speak in foreign languages. This miracle draws a diverse Jewish crowd. Peter delivers a sermon identifying this outpouring as the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy and declaring Jesus of Nazareth, whom the people crucified, as the resurrected Lord and Christ prophesied by David. When the crowd is convicted and asks how to respond, Peter commands them to repent and be baptized for the remission of sins to receive the Holy Spirit. Three thousand are baptized, and the new community lives in unity, sharing all their possessions.
Reception — In Latter-day Saint theology, Acts 2 is a cornerstone for several foundational doctrines. Peter's sermon in Acts 2:37-38 is read as the definitive New Testament articulation of the first principles and ordinances of the gospel: faith in Jesus Christ, repentance, baptism by immersion for the remission of sins, and the laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost. James E. Talmage emphasizes that the receipt of the Holy Ghost mentioned here refers to the permanent endowment of the Spirit following authorized baptism, distinguishing it from temporary spiritual manifestations. Furthermore, the quotation of Joel in Acts 2:17-21 is understood to have a latter-day fulfillment. Joseph Smith recorded that the angel Moroni quoted these verses, declaring they were not yet fully realized but would soon be fulfilled in the dispensation of the fulness of times. Finally, the economic unity described in Acts 2:44-45 is interpreted by authorities like Bruce R. McConkie as an ancient living of the Law of Consecration, mirroring the establishment of a Zion society where believers are of one heart and mind with no poor among them.
Application — Latter-day Saint missionaries heavily utilize Acts 2:38 to invite individuals to enter the covenant path through baptism and confirmation. The chapter's model of community life in Acts 2:44-45 is applied practically through the church's welfare program, fast offerings, and the law of tithing, which members view as preparatory to living the full Law of Consecration. Additionally, the manifestation of spiritual gifts, such as tongues and prophecy described in Acts 2:1-4 and 17-18, are actively expected and recognized in modern church practice as signs following true believers.
Autoridades citadas:Joseph Smith — Joseph Smith-History · James E. Talmage — The Articles of Faith · Bruce R. McConkie — Doctrinal New Testament Commentary
Jehovah's Witnesses
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Jehovah's Witness reading (Watch Tower Society): attention to the divine name, God's Kingdom as a real government, conditional immortality, and a non-Trinitarian Christology. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Significado imediato — Acts 2 records the historic events of Pentecost 33 C.E., when the holy spirit was miraculously poured out upon the disciples, enabling them to speak in foreign languages. Peter delivers a public discourse explaining this phenomenon through the prophecies of Joel and Psalms, arguing that Jesus of Nazareth has been resurrected and exalted by God. The chapter concludes with the baptism of about three thousand individuals and the establishment of a unified, active Christian community.
Reception — For Jehovah's Witnesses, Acts 2 is a foundational text that provides scriptural backing for several core, distinct doctrines, particularly regarding the nature of the holy spirit, non-Trinitarian Christology, the divine name, and the state of the dead. First, Watch Tower publications emphasize that the holy spirit is not a person but God's active force; they point out that it is described in this chapter as something that can be 'poured out' (vv. 17, 18, 33) and that individuals can be 'filled' with (v. 4), language incompatible with a person. Second, regarding Christology, the tradition highlights the clear distinction Peter draws between God and Jesus. In verses 34 and 35, Peter quotes Psalm 110 to show Jehovah speaking to Jesus, and verse 36 states that God 'made him' both Lord and Christ, which Witnesses read as absolute proof that Jesus is subordinate to and created by the Almighty. Third, the quotation of Joel 2:32 in Acts 2:21 ('whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved') is a primary scriptural warrant for the New World Translation's restoration of the divine name 'Jehovah' into the Christian Greek Scriptures, asserting that salvation requires explicitly invoking the Father's name. Finally, Peter's argument regarding David is central to the tradition's mortalist anthropology. Because Peter states David is still in his tomb (v. 29) and 'did not ascend into the heavens' (v. 34), Witnesses teach that humans do not possess an immortal soul that survives death to go to heaven. Likewise, Jesus' soul being in 'Hades' (vv. 27, 31) is taught to mean he was completely dead in the common grave of mankind, from which God resurrected him.
Application — In their global ministry, Jehovah's Witnesses frequently use Acts 2:21 to urge people to learn and use God's personal name, Jehovah, as a requirement for salvation. Acts 2:38 is utilized to outline the scriptural steps for dedication: repentance, conversion, and water baptism in recognition of Jesus' role. The portrait of the early congregation in verses 42-47—marked by unified teaching, fellowship, and daily spiritual activity—is frequently held up as the organizational and spiritual model that the modern Witness community strives to replicate.
Autoridades citadas:Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — What Does the Bible Really Teach? · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — The Divine Name That Will Endure Forever · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Bearing Thorough Witness to God's Kingdom
Passo 4Estabelecer a base no idioma original
A tradução é construída a partir do texto fonte, não da maioria em inglês.
Base textual — The provided Greek text (reflecting Byzantine/TR readings in several places, e.g., v.30, v.31, but aligning with critical texts like NA28 elsewhere, e.g., omitting the TR addition in v.43).
Nomes divinos — Theos (God), Kyrios (Lord)
- v1: 'homou' vs TR 'homothymadon'
- v7: includes 'pros allēlous' which NA28 omits
- v23: includes 'labontes' typical of TR, omitted in NA28
- v30: includes 'to kata sarka anastēsein ton christon' found in Byzantine/TR, omitted in NA28
- v31: includes 'hē psychē autou' found in TR, omitted in NA28
- v33: 'ho nyn hymeis' vs NA28 '[ho] hymeis [kai]'
- v37: 'tēn kardian' (accusative) vs NA28 'tē kardia' (dative)
- v43: omits TR addition 'en Ierousalēm, megas te phobos ēn epi pantas'
- v1: (b) alliteration in 'pentēkostēs ēsan pantes'; (e) inclusio 'epi to auto' linking with vv.44, 47; (h) particle 'Kai' beginning the narrative.
- v2: (b) assonance/alliteration in 'ēchos hōsper... holon ton oikon hou'; (c) article-noun-relative construction 'ton oikon hou'.
- v3: (d) number shift from plural feminine subject 'glōssai' to singular verb 'ekathisen' (it sat upon each).
- v4: (c) definite-article shift from anarthrous 'pneumatos hagiou' to arthrous 'to pneuma'; (f) repetition of 'pantes' from v1.
- v5: (d) appositional number agreement 'Ioudaioi, andres eulabeis'.
- v6: (b) alliteration with syn- prefix 'synēlthen... synechythē'; (d) number shift from singular collective 'to plēthos' and singular verbs to plural verb 'ēkouon' and singular distributive 'heis hekastos'; (f) refrain 'tē idia dialektō' repeated in v8.
- v7: (h) interjection 'ouch idou' (not behold); (b) assonance in 'hapantes... lalountes... Galilaioi'.
- v8: (d) number shift from plural 'hēmeis akouomen' to singular distributive 'hekastos'; (f) repetition of 'tē idia dialektō' from v6.
- v9: (c) selective definite article usage grouping 'tēn Mesopotamian... Ponton kai tēn Asian'.
- v10: (c) stacked definite articles 'ta merē tēs Libyēs tēs kata Kyrēnēn'.
- v11: (g) divine name 'tou theou'; (f) thematic repetition 'tais hēmeterais glōssais'.
- v12: (f) repetition of 'existanto de pantes' from v7; (h) idiomatic interrogative particle construction 'ti an thelei touto einai'.
- v13: (b) alliteration 'diachleuazontes... gleukous'.
- v14: (h) address 'andres Ioudaioi'; (d) number contrast 'Statheis' (sg) with 'tois hendeka' (pl).
- v15: (h) negative and emphatic pronoun 'ou gar hōs hymeis'.
- v16: (c) arthrous prophet 'dia tou prophētou Iōēl'.
- v17: (a) figura etymologica 'enypniois enypniasthēsontai' (dream with dreams); (f) refrain 'ekcheō apo tou pneumatos mou... prophēteusousin' repeated in v18; (g) divine name 'ho theos'.
- v18: (h) emphatic particles 'kai ge'; (f) exact repetition of outpouring refrain from v17.
- v19: (e) spatial chiasm 'ouranō anō' and 'gēs katō'; (f) 'terata kai sēmeia' introduced, recurring in v22, 43.
- v20: (g) divine name 'hēmeran kyriou'; (c) arthrous adjectives 'tēn megalēn kai epiphanē'.
- v21: (d) singular generalizing pronoun 'pas hos an... sōthēsetai'; (g) divine name 'onoma kyriou'.
- v22: (e) inclusio bounding the core speech with v36; (g) divine name 'tou theou... ho theos'; (f) repetition of 'dynamesin kai terasin kai sēmeiois' from v19.
- v23: (c) single article binding two nouns 'tē hōrismenē boulē kai prognōsei tou theou'; (a) cognate thematic echo 'ekdoton... prospēxantes'.
- v24: (g) divine name 'ho theos'; (a) idiom 'lysas tas ōdinas' (loosing the pangs).
- v25: (g) divine name 'ton kyrion'; (e) chiastic spatial phrasing 'enōpion mou / ek dexiōn mou'.
- v26: (f) threefold structural repetition with 'mou' (kardia, glōssa, sarx).
- v27: (f) exact phrase quoted 'enkataleipseis tēn psychēn mou eis hadēn, oude dōseis ton hosion sou idein diaphthoran' which is repeated in third person in v31; (c) article balance 'tēn psychēn mou... ton hosion sou'.
- v28: (c) anarthrous construct 'hodous zōēs'.
- v29: (h) address 'Andres adelphoi'; (d) paired singular verbs 'eteleutēsen kai etapha'.
- v30: (a) figura etymologica 'horkō ōmosen' (swore with an oath); (g) divine name 'ho theos'.
- v31: (f) structural repetition and third-person adaptation of v27 'oute enkataleiphthē hē psychē autou eis hadēn oute hē sarx autou eiden diaphthoran'.
- v32: (g) divine name 'ho theos'; (f) inclusive refrain 'hou pantes hēmeis esmen martyres'.
- v33: (c) arthrous construction 'tē dexia oun tou theou'; (f) 'execheen' (poured out) echoing the Joel prophecy from v17.
- v34: (g) double divine name 'ho kyrios tō kyriō mou'.
- v35: (a) figura etymologica 'hypopodion tōn podōn' (footstool of feet).
- v36: (e) inclusio with v22 (Jesus, God, Israel); (g) dual titles 'kyrion... christon... ho theos'.
- v37: (a) striking idiom 'katenygēsan tēn kardian' (pierced to the heart); (h) interrogative interjection 'ti poiēsōmen, andres adelphoi'.
- v38: (d) number shift from plural imperative 'metanoēsate' to singular imperative 'baptisthētō' with singular distributive subject 'hekastos'; (g) divine name 'onomati Iēsou Christou'.
- v39: (g) divine name 'kyrios ho theos hēmōn'; (d) expanding plural scopes 'hymin... teknois... pasin'.
- v40: (c) demonstrative sandwich pattern 'tēs geneas tēs skolias tautēs'.
- v41: (d) transition to massive plurality 'psychai hōsei trischiliai'.
- v42: (c) repeated definite articles with polysyndeton 'tē didachē... kai tē koinōnia, kai tē klasei... kai tais proseuchais'.
- v43: (d) singular universal 'pasē psychē' contrasting with plural 'polla terata'; (f) repetition of 'terata kai sēmeia' from v19, 22.
- v44: (e) inclusio phrase 'epi to auto' returning from v1.
- v45: (d) number shift from plural 'pasin' to singular condition 'kathoti an tis chreian eichen'.
- v46: (b) alliteration/assonance 'agalliasei kai aphelotēti'; (f) daily temple persistence.
- v47: (g) divine names 'ton theon... ho de kyrios'; (e) final inclusio 'epi to auto' closing the chapter's narrative arc.
Passo 5Comparar as traduções, versículo por versículo
Cada diferença classificada: textual · lexical · gramatical · interpretativa · estilística (esta última apenas quando altera o sentido).
- grammaticalv1 differing translations of the introductory conjunction/preposition phrase — “And when” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Now” (WEB) vs “in” (YLT)
- textualv1 differing singular/plural based on underlying text traditions — “day” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “days” (DRC)
- lexicalv1 differing translations of the verb for 'accomplished' or 'fulfilled' — “was fully come” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “had” (WEB) vs “now” (ASV) vs “being fulfilled” (YLT) vs “now accomplishing” (DARBY) vs “were accomplished” (DRC)
- grammaticalv3 differing translations of the distributive phrase — “upon each” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “one” (ASV, DARBY) vs “on” (WEB) vs “also one” (YLT) vs “every one” (DRC)
- lexicalv4 (vv 4, 38) differing historical synonyms for the Holy Spirit — “Spirit” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Ghost” (KJV, DRC)
- lexicalv4 (vv 4, 11) differing translations of the term for tongues/languages — “with other tongues” (KJV, ASV, DARBY) vs “languages” (WEB) vs “according” (YLT) vs “in languages” (WEBSTER) vs “divers according” (DRC)
- grammaticalv4 differing handling of the verb 'gave' and the Spirit's title — “Spirit gave” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “was giving” (YLT) vs “to” (DARBY) vs “Holy Ghost” (DRC)
- lexicalv4 differing translations of the verb for inspired speech — “utterance” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “the ability to speak” (WEB) vs “to declare” (YLT) vs “to speak forth” (DARBY) vs “to speak” (DRC)
- grammaticalv5 differing translations of the conjunction — “Now” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “And” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv5 (vv 5, 19, 29) differing prepositions for location — “at” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “in” (WEB, YLT)
- lexicalv5 differing translations of the adjective for religious reverence — “devout” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “pious” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv5 differing prepositions indicating origin — “from” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “out of” (KJV, DRC)
- lexicalv5 differing translations of the term for the heavens/sky — “heaven” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the sky” (WEB) vs “the” (YLT)
- lexicalv6 differing translations describing the spread of the sound/report — “was noised abroad” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “sound heard” (WEB, ASV) vs “having come” (YLT) vs “having spread” (DARBY)
- lexicalv6 differing translations of the verb for confusion — “were confounded” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “bewildered” (WEB) vs “was” (YLT) vs “in mind” (DRC)
- grammaticalv6 (vv 6, 11) differing verb forms (participle vs infinitive) — “speaking” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “speak” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
- lexicalv6 differing translations of the term for language/dialect — “own language” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “proper dialect” (YLT) vs “dialect” (DARBY) vs “tongue” (DRC)
- lexicalv7 differing synonyms for marveling — “marveled” (WEB, WEBSTER) vs “marvelled” (KJV, ASV) vs “wondered” (DARBY, DRC) vs “did wonder” (YLT)
- grammaticalv7 differing relative clauses and participle translations — “who” (WEB, WEBSTER) vs “which speak Galileans” (KJV) vs “that Galilæans” (ASV) vs “who are speaking” (YLT) vs “who are speaking Galilaeans” (DARBY) vs “that” (DRC)
- grammaticalv8 (vv 8, 21, 39) differing auxiliary verbs — “do” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “hear” (KJV, ASV) vs “have” (DRC)
- grammaticalv8 differing phrasing for hearing individually — “every man in” (KJV, ASV) vs “hear everyone” (WEB) vs “hear each” (YLT) vs “hear them each” (DARBY) vs “hear” (WEBSTER) vs “heard” (DRC)
- grammaticalv9 (vv 9, 14) differing translations of the participle for inhabitants — “the dwellers in” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “people from” (WEB) vs “those dwelling” (YLT) vs “those who inhabit” (DARBY) vs “inhabitants of” (DRC)
- lexicalv10 differing translations of the preposition indicating proximity — “about” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “around” (WEB) vs “that are along” (YLT) vs “which adjoin” (DARBY)
- interpretivev11 differing arrangement or verse division of the people groups — “Cretans” (WEB, ASV, DARBY) vs “Cretes” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “Jews also and proselytes” (DRC)
- lexicalv11 differing translations of the term for great deeds — “wonderful works” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “mighty” (WEB, ASV) vs “great things” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv12 differing synonyms for amazement — “amazed” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “astonished” (DRC)
- lexicalv12 differing translations of the verb for perplexity — “were in doubt” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “perplexed” (WEB, ASV) vs “perplexity” (DARBY) vs “wondered” (DRC)
- grammaticalv12 differing prepositions — “one to” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “one” (WEB) vs “unto” (YLT)
- grammaticalv12 differing auxiliary verbs for the question — “meaneth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “would” (YLT, DARBY) vs “does” (WEB)
- grammaticalv13 use of pronoun vs supplied noun — “They” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “These men” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC)
- lexicalv13 differing translations of the term for new/sweet wine — “full of new” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “filled with” (WEB, ASV) vs “sweet” (YLT)
- lexicalv14 differing translations of the verb for speaking boldly — “spoke out to” (WEB) vs “said unto” (KJV) vs “spake forth” (ASV) vs “declared to” (YLT) vs “spoke forth to” (DARBY) vs “to” (WEBSTER) vs “spoke to” (DRC)
- lexicalv14 differing translations of the term for Jews/Judeans — “of Judea” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Judæa” (ASV) vs “Jews” (YLT) vs “Judaea” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv14 differing formulations of the imperative — “be” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “let” (WEB, YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv14 differing translations of the verb for listening — “hearken to” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “listen” (WEB) vs “give ear unto” (ASV) vs “harken” (YLT) vs “give heed” (DARBY) vs “with your ears receive” (DRC)
- lexicalv15 differing translations of the verb for drunkenness — “are not drunken” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “aren’t” (WEB) vs “full of wine” (DARBY) vs “drunk” (DRC)
- lexicalv15 differing translations of the verb for supposing/assuming — “ye suppose seeing” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB, DRC) vs “take” (YLT) vs “for” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv16 differing tense and relative pronoun structures — “that which was” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “hath been” (ASV, YLT) vs “what has been” (WEB)
- grammaticalv16 differing prepositions for agency — “through” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “by” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “of” (DRC)
- lexicalv17 differing translations of the future verb — “shall come to pass” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “be” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “will be” (WEB)
- textualv17 differing divine title (God vs Lord) based on underlying texts — “saith God” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “says that” (WEB) vs “that” (DARBY) vs “the Lord” (DRC)
- lexicalv17 differing translations of the term for old men/elders — “old men shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “will” (WEB) vs “elders” (DARBY)
- lexicalv18 differing translations of emphatic conjunctions — “And on” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “Yes” (WEB) vs “Yea” (ASV) vs “also upon” (YLT) vs “yea even upon” (DARBY) vs “upon” (DRC)
- lexicalv18 differing translations of the term for servants/slaves — “servants” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “men-servants” (YLT) vs “bondmen” (DARBY) vs “indeed” (DRC)
- lexicalv19 differing translations of the verb to give/show — “show” (WEB, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “shew” (KJV, DRC) vs “give” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv19 differing translations of the term for heaven/sky — “the” (ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “heaven” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “the sky” (WEB)
- lexicalv19 differing synonyms for underneath — “beneath” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “below” (DARBY)
- lexicalv19 differing translations of the term for vapor/smoke — “vapour” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “vapor” (ASV, WEBSTER) vs “billows” (WEB)
- lexicalv20 differing translations of the verb for turning/changing — “turned into” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “to” (YLT) vs “changed to” (DARBY)
- lexicalv20 differing translations of the adjective for notable/manifest — “that great and notable” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “the glorious” (WEB) vs “the” (ASV) vs “the coming of the” (YLT) vs “the gloriously appearing” (DARBY) vs “the manifest” (DRC)
- lexicalv22 differing translations of the title Nazarene/of Nazareth — “of Nazareth” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the Nazarene” (YLT) vs “the Nazaraean” (DARBY)
- lexicalv22 differing translations of the verb for approved/attested — “approved of” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DRC) vs “by” (WEB, WEBSTER) vs “borne witness to by” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv22 differing prepositions for location/dative case — “among” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “to” (WEB, DARBY) vs “unto” (ASV)
- lexicalv22 differing translations of the term for powerful deeds — “mighty works” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “miracles” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “works of power” (DARBY)
- lexicalv22 differing verbs and prepositions for agency — “did by” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “through” (YLT) vs “wrought” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv23 differing phrasing and pronoun structures for the delivery of Jesus — “up” (WEB, ASV) vs “Him being delivered” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “this one” (YLT) vs “given up” (DARBY) vs “This same up” (DRC)
- lexicalv23 differing forms of the adjective for determined — “determinate” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “determined” (WEB)
- lexicalv24 differing translations of the verb for loosing/freeing — “loosed” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “freed him from” (WEB)
- lexicalv24 differing translations of the term for pangs/birth pains — “pains” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “agony” (WEB) vs “pangs” (ASV) vs “sorrows” (DRC)
- textualv24 differing nouns (death vs hell) based on underlying texts — “death because” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “the” (YLT) vs “inasmuch as” (DARBY) vs “hell as” (DRC)
- grammaticalv24 differing translations of the passive verb and agency — “held by” (WEB, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “holden of it” (KJV, ASV) vs “held by its power” (DARBY) vs “by” (DRC)
- grammaticalv25 differing prepositions/phrasing for speaking about someone — “speaketh concerning” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “saith” (ASV, DRC) vs “says” (WEB) vs “saith in regard to” (YLT) vs “says as to” (DARBY)
- lexicalv25 differing translations of the verb for foreseeing/seeing — “foresaw” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “saw” (WEB, WEBSTER) vs “beheld” (ASV)
- lexicalv25 differing translations of the phrase for 'before my face' — “my face for” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “me because” (YLT, DARBY) vs “because” (DRC)
- grammaticalv25 (vv 25, 34) differing prepositions for position — “on” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “at” (DARBY, DRC)
- grammaticalv25 differing auxiliary verbs for purpose — “should” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “may” (YLT, DARBY, DRC)
- lexicalv26 differing translations of the verb for rejoicing — “was glad” (WEB, ASV) vs “rejoice” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “cheered” (YLT) vs “rejoiced” (DARBY) vs “hath been glad” (DRC)
- textualv26 variant reading or possible typographical error in translation source — “my” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “any” (DRC)
- lexicalv26 differing translations of the conjunctions and verb for exulting — “rejoiced” (WEB, ASV) vs “was glad moreover also” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “and yet” (YLT) vs “exulted yea more” (DARBY) vs “hath rejoiced” (DRC)
- lexicalv26 differing translations of the verb for resting/dwelling — “shall rest in” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “also dwell” (ASV, DARBY) vs “also will dwell” (WEB) vs “also on” (YLT) vs “also” (DRC)
- grammaticalv27 differing causal conjunctions — “Because thou wilt” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you will” (WEB) vs “for” (DARBY)
- lexicalv27 differing synonyms for corruption/decay — “corruption” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “decay” (WEB)
- grammaticalv28 differing verb forms for second person — “Thou hast made” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “You” (WEB) vs “madest” (ASV) vs “didst make” (YLT)
- grammaticalv28 differing verb structures — “thou shalt make” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “You will” (WEB) vs “fill” (YLT) vs “wilt fill” (DARBY) vs “wilt” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv28 differing translations of the term for joy/gladness — “full of joy” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “gladness” (WEB, ASV) vs “with” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv28 differing translations of the term for face/presence — “thy countenance” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “your presence” (WEB)
- grammaticalv29 differing prepositions/adverbs — “concerning” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “freely” (WEB, ASV) vs “of” (KJV, DRC)
- grammaticalv29 (vv 29, 40) differing verb aspects — “died” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DRC) vs “is both dead” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “has died” (DARBY)
- lexicalv29 differing translations of the term for tomb — “tomb” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “sepulchre” (KJV, DRC) vs “monument” (DARBY) vs “sepulcher” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv30 (vv 30, 40) differing verb forms (participle vs finite) — “knowing” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “knew” (DRC)
- lexicalv31 differing translations of the term for the underworld (Hades/Hell) and conjunctions — “did” (WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Hades and” (WEB) vs “in hell neither” (KJV) vs “unto Hades nor did” (ASV) vs “to hades nor did” (YLT) vs “hades nor” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv33 differing participle arrangement and phrasing — “Therefore being by” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “therefore exalted” (WEB) vs “therefore” (ASV) vs “at” (YLT) vs “Having been exalted” (DARBY) vs “exalted therefore” (DRC)
- grammaticalv33 differing prepositions and verb choices — “received of the Father” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “from” (WEB, WEBSTER) vs “been exalted also” (YLT)
- lexicalv33 differing translations of the verb for pouring out — “has poured out” (WEB, DARBY) vs “hath shed forth” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “poured” (ASV, DRC) vs “was shedding” (YLT)
- grammaticalv34 differing verb tenses and prepositions — “to” (WEB, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “said unto” (KJV, ASV, DARBY) vs “saith to” (YLT)
- grammaticalv37 differing translations of the temporal clause vs participle — “Now when they” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “And having” (YLT, DARBY) vs “had” (DRC)
- grammaticalv37 differing verb structures and conjunctions — “to” (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “and said unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “they say also to” (YLT)
- lexicalv37 differing translations of the term for the rest/others — “rest of the” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “other” (DARBY)
- interpretivev38 differing theological translations of the command to repent — “Repent” (WEB, KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “ye” (ASV) vs “Reform” (YLT) vs “Do penance” (DRC)
- grammaticalv38 differing distributive pronouns — “baptized every one” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “each” (YLT) vs “baptised each” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv38 differing pronoun/auxiliary structures — “ye shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “you will” (WEB) vs “will” (DARBY) vs “you” (DRC)
- grammaticalv39 differing relative clauses for distance — “that are afar” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “who far” (WEB) vs “those” (YLT) vs “who” (DARBY) vs “far” (DRC)
- grammaticalv40 passive vs middle/reflexive interpretation of the verb — “Save yourselves” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Be saved” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv40 differing translations of the adjective for crooked/perverse — “perverse” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “crooked” (WEB, ASV) vs “untoward” (KJV)
- lexicalv42 differing translations of the verb for persisting/continuing — “steadfastly” (WEB, WEBSTER) vs “continued stedfastly” (KJV, ASV) vs “were continuing” (YLT) vs “persevered” (DARBY) vs “were persevering” (DRC)
- grammaticalv43 differing verb choices and prepositions — “came upon” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “on” (WEB, YLT) vs “was” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv43 differing expressions of agency — “were done by” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “through” (WEB, ASV) vs “being through” (YLT) vs “took place through” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv44 differing relative clauses vs participles — “that believed” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “who” (WEB) vs “those believing” (YLT) vs “they” (DRC)
- lexicalv45 differing translations of the term for possessions/goods — “goods” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “the they were selling” (YLT) vs “substance” (DARBY) vs “they sold” (DRC)
- lexicalv45 differing translations of the verb for distributing — “parted” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “distributed” (WEB, DARBY) vs “were parting” (YLT) vs “divided” (DRC)
- grammaticalv45 differing inclusion of supplied noun — “according” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “men” (KJV, WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv45 differing indefinite pronouns and phrasing — “every man had” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “anyone” (WEB) vs “any” (ASV) vs “any one” (YLT) vs “any one might have” (DARBY) vs “one” (DRC)
- lexicalv46 differing translations of the term for simplicity/sincerity — “singleness” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “simplicity” (YLT, DARBY, DRC)
Passo 6Sintetizar — alegações atômicas, por família, não por número de assentos
Cada declaração é dividida nas menores alegações testáveis; cada perfil elegível é AFIRMA / NEGA / QUALIFICA / SILENCIA sobre cada uma.
O consenso
Broadly, Christian traditions affirm that the early church's devotion to the apostles' teaching, fellowship, the breaking of bread, and prayers provides the normative elements for corporate worship and the irreducible basis for church unity. Several traditions also emphasize that the gift of tongues at Pentecost reverses the linguistic division of Babel and understand the 'breaking of bread' as denoting the Eucharistic sacrifice. However, the chapter's instructions regarding baptism are highly disputed; traditions sharply divide over whether water baptism is an instrumental necessity to obtain the remission of sins or merely a public memorial of salvation already received, as well as whether the sequence of hearing and repenting precludes infant baptism or if the promise extending to 'your children' warrants it. The theological implications of Pentecost itself are similarly disputed, with groups disagreeing on whether the event is a unique, unrepeatable milestone in redemptive history or a normative paradigm for believers to seek a subsequent 'Spirit baptism' accompanied by tongues. Finally, the early believers' communal sharing of possessions is disputed, as traditions disagree over whether this practice was a voluntary act of love that did not abolish private property, a binding mandate for Christian social justice, or the biblical charter for coenobitic monasticism.
Amplo — APOIO em todas as famílias, exceto uma, sendo esta indeterminada
The early church's devotion to the apostles' teaching, fellowship, breaking of bread, and prayers provides the normative elements for corporate worship and the irreducible basis for church unity.
5 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 6 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (6)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, Acts 2:42 serves as a perpetual blueprint for Catholic parish life and ecclesial renewal, emphasizing that true community requires adherence to the Magisterium (apostolic teaching), the Eucharist (breaking of bread), and liturgical prayer.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“About three thousand are baptized, forming a community characterized by steadfast adherence to apostolic teaching, the breaking of bread, prayer, and the radical sharing of possessions.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“William Reed Huntington identified these four elements as the primitive, irreducible marks of the Catholic Church, a vision that directly shaped the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral as the Anglican basis for global Christian unity.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, verse 42 shapes the Lutheran understanding of parish life and liturgy, emphasizing that the local church is not a mere social organization, but an assembly constituted by and gathered around the pure preaching of the Word and the right administration of the Lord’s Supper.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · QUALIFY
“Finally, the regulative principle of worship and Reformed ecclesiology look to verse 42 as the normative blueprint for corporate worship.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“In local church practice, Acts 2:42 provides the foundational elements for gathered worship: expository preaching, covenant fellowship, the Lord's Supper, and corporate prayer.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Específico de família — característico de uma família
The gift of tongues at Pentecost reverses the linguistic division of Babel, uniting humanity into a universal spiritual fellowship.
3 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 8 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (4)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Irenaeus and Augustine read the multiplicity of tongues not as confusion, but as the Spirit gathering divided nations into the unity of the one Catholic Church.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The miracle of speaking in tongues is celebrated as the reversal of the Tower of Babel; as St. Gregory of Nazianzus articulates, whereas God once confused the languages to divide arrogant humanity, the Spirit now distributes tongues to unite the nations in the confession of God's glory (verses 4-11).” - Oriental Orthodox · QUALIFY
“He reads the tongues of fire (vv. 3-4) typologically as the divine reversal of the Tower of Babel: where pride once divided human languages, the Holy Spirit now distributes tongues to unite the disparate nations into the one orthodox Church.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Broad Church theologians like F.D. Maurice read the Pentecost narrative (vv. 1-11) as the theological constitution of a universal human fellowship, arguing that the Spirit's descent and the gift of tongues reversed the fragmentation of Babel and established a spiritual kingdom meant to encompass all nations.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The prophetic outpouring upon 'daughters' and 'handmaidens' provides biblical validation for women's public preaching and ministry.
2 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 10 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (2)
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Phoebe Palmer utilized Peter's quotation of Joel in verses 17-18 ('your daughters shall prophesy') in her work The Promise of the Father to fiercely defend the right of women to preach, arguing that the Pentecostal outpouring permanently removed gender barriers to public ministry.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The quotation of Joel (Acts 2:16-21) provides the tradition's eschatological framework: the church operates in the 'latter rain' of the last days, expecting universal prophetic empowerment across gender, race, and class lines.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
Christ's soul descended into Hades to deliver the righteous dead while His physical body was preserved from corruption in the tomb.
2 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 10 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (2)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Thomas Aquinas cites Peter's use of Psalm 16 to affirm Christ's descent into Hades (the limbo of the Fathers) to deliver the just prior to His resurrection, noting that His flesh did not suffer corruption.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“St. John Chrysostom emphasizes that this specific Greek term, diaphthora (corruption), anchors the reality of Christ's bodily resurrection and His victorious descent into Hades, demonstrating that death could not hold the Author of Life.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The phrase 'breaking of bread' denotes the Eucharistic sacrifice.
3 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (3)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Verse 42 is dogmatically foundational: 'the breaking of bread' is universally recognized by commentators like Bede the Venerable as the Eucharistic sacrifice, anchoring the Church's liturgical life.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, the early church's commitment to 'the breaking of bread and prayers' (verse 42) is identified unequivocally with the Eucharistic Liturgy, the core of Orthodox worship.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The 'breaking of bread' (v. 42) is unequivocally received as the Eucharistic sacrifice, marking the enduring center of the Church's communion.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The events of Pentecost provide the liturgical foundation for the Prostration or Kneeling Prayers marking the resumption of kneeling after the Paschal season.
2 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 10 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (2)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Following the Divine Liturgy of Pentecost, the Church immediately celebrates the Kneeling Vespers. During this service, the faithful kneel for the first time since Pascha, breaking the festal standing posture to hear profound prayers attributed to St. Basil the Great, which invoke the Holy Spirit for guidance, forgiveness, and rest for the departed (verses 1-4).” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“In the Coptic and Syriac rites, the chapter provides the foundation for the Prostration (or Kneeling) Prayers performed on Pentecost afternoon, which ritualize the reception of the Holy Spirit and the resumption of kneeling (which is forbidden during the fifty days of Easter).”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
Específico de tradição — apenas uma tradição
The manifestation of tongues at Pentecost consisted exclusively of intelligible, known human dialects given for cross-cultural evangelism.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Additionally, the Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary utilizes Acts 2:4-11 to define the biblical gift of tongues strictly as the miraculous speaking of actual, unlearned human languages for cross-cultural evangelism, establishing a safeguard against modern charismatic movements that promote ecstatic utterances.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
The Pentecostal outpouring constitutes the 'early rain' of the Holy Spirit, foreshadowing an eschatological 'latter rain' prior to the Second Coming.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Drawing on Ellen G. White's 'The Acts of the Apostles', the tradition views the Pentecostal outpouring as the 'early rain' of the Holy Spirit. Consequently, the church applies this chapter by actively praying for and anticipating a corresponding 'latter rain' of the Spirit to empower the final global proclamation of the three angels' messages before Christ's return.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
The outpouring of the Holy Spirit communicates uncreated divine energies to the Church, enabling theosis.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The descent of the Holy Spirit (verses 1-4) is not viewed as a one-time historical event, but as the inauguration of the continuous Pentecost that sustains the Church's sacramental life, pouring out uncreated divine energies to make theosis (deification) possible for the faithful.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
The fulfillment of Joel's prophecy inaugurates the 'last days,' marked by a democratized outpouring of the Spirit on all believers regardless of gender, age, or social status.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Peter interprets the event not as drunkenness, but as the inauguration of the eschatological 'last days' prophesied by Joel, wherein the Spirit is democratized across all flesh, transcending age, gender, and social status (Acts 2:15-21).”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
Peter's assertion that David is dead and has not ascended into heaven demonstrates that the souls of the righteous wait unconsciously in the grave rather than entering heaven immediately at death.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“In 'The Great Controversy', Ellen G. White highlights Peter's explicit statements that David 'is both dead and buried' and 'is not ascended into the heavens' (Acts 2:29, 34) to forcefully refute the doctrine of the natural immortality of the soul, arguing that the righteous wait in the grave until the resurrection.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
The declaration that God made Jesus 'both Lord and Christ' refers to the one incarnate Word in his economic condescension, avoiding a division of Christ into two separate subjects.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Cyril insists that the title refers to the one incarnate Word in his economic condescension; it is the single, undivided hypostasis of the incarnate Christ who is exalted.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
The crucifixion of Christ was executed by culpable, lawless men, yet was simultaneously ordained by the exact predetermined counsel and foreknowledge of God.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“John Calvin, in his 'Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles', and the Westminster Confession of Faith (Chapters 3 and 5) rely heavily on verse 23 to demonstrate that God's 'determinate counsel and foreknowledge' ordains whatsoever comes to pass, even the sinful crucifixion of Christ, without God becoming the author of sin or violating the will of the 'lawless men' who executed it.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
The prophetic signs of the sun turning to darkness and the moon to blood were historically fulfilled by literal cosmic events in the eighteenth century.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“White and Adventist pioneers mapped these exact signs to the Dark Day of May 19, 1780, and the subsequent appearance of the moon as blood, viewing them as fulfilled historical milestones heralding the approaching Second Advent.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
Peter's exhortation to repent, be baptized, and receive the Holy Spirit establishes the normative sacramental initiation sequence of Baptism, Penance, and Confirmation or Chrismation.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 10 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (2)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Peter's command to repent (translated in the Vulgate and Douay-Rheims as 'do penance') and be baptized grounds the Catholic understanding of Baptism and the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins, while the subsequent 'gift of the Holy Spirit' is seen as the biblical basis for the Sacrament of Confirmation.” - Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
“Peter’s instruction to be baptized and receive the 'gift of the Holy Spirit' (verse 38) is received as the scriptural pairing of Baptism and Chrismation, where Chrismation functions as the personal Pentecost of every believer.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The promise given to 'children' is strictly conditioned upon God's effectual call, excluding any guarantee of salvation based on physical parentage.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Baptist · AFFIRM
“Thus, the promise is restricted to the elect who experience effectual calling, regardless of physical parentage.”
- Baptist · AFFIRM
The conviction of the crowd, being 'cut to the heart,' demonstrates the initial work of awakening and prevenient grace.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“John Wesley, in his Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament, saw the crowd being 'pricked in their heart' (v. 37) as the quintessential operation of awakening grace, leading to repentance and justification.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
Peter's sermon exemplifies the proper distinction of Law and Gospel, where accusing the crowd produces contrition before the Gospel of remission is offered.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“C.F.W. Walther highlights verses 37–38 to demonstrate how the Law must be applied in its full severity—accusing the hearers of murdering the Messiah to the point that they are 'cut to the heart' (producing terrores conscientiae, or terrors of conscience)—before the sweet Gospel of grace and remission of sins can be offered.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
The Holy Spirit works to create faith strictly through the external means of the preached Word and the sacraments, rather than through direct internal enthusiasm.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Third, against 'enthusiasts' who seek the Holy Spirit apart from external means, Lutheran theology points out that the Spirit does not work independently of the Word; the Spirit's descent immediately yields the external, preached Word, and the three thousand receive the Spirit specifically through the external sacrament of Baptism.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
The call to save oneself from a crooked generation mandates that the church function as a visible, alternative society separated from worldly systems.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The call to save oneself from a perverse generation (Acts 2:40) requires the visible separation of the true church from worldly and coercive systems.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
The outpouring of the Spirit is a Trinitarian event wherein the exalted Son receives the Spirit from the Father and sheds it forth.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Exalted to God’s right hand, the vindicated Christ receives the Spirit from the Father and pours it out (Acts 2:33).”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
Em disputa — uma família é mista, ou famílias afirmam vs. negam
Speaking in tongues as the Spirit gives utterance establishes the normative initial physical evidence for the baptism in the Holy Spirit.
1 afirmam · 2 negam · 0 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre MIXEDquem disse o quê (3)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“The events of Pentecost in Acts 2 are a unique, unrepeatable epochal milestone in redemptive history rather than a normative pattern for individual 'Spirit baptism' today.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · DENY
“The tradition notably emphasizes the sanctifying power of the Spirit over the charism of glossolalia, distinguishing its reading from later Pentecostalism.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, speaking in tongues is identified as the 'initial physical evidence' of this baptism.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
The events of Pentecost are a unique, unrepeatable milestone in redemptive history rather than a normative paradigm for subsequent believers to expect a similar 'Spirit baptism'.
1 afirmam · 4 negam · 0 qualificam · 7 silenciamAntiga LEANING-CONTESTEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTEDquem disse o quê (5)
- Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“The descent of the Holy Spirit (verses 1-4) is not viewed as a one-time historical event, but as the inauguration of the continuous Pentecost that sustains the Church's sacramental life, pouring out uncreated divine energies to make theosis (deification) possible for the faithful.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“The events of Pentecost in Acts 2 are a unique, unrepeatable epochal milestone in redemptive history rather than a normative pattern for individual 'Spirit baptism' today.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · DENY
“John Fletcher, in his Checks to Antinomianism, made a critical theological maneuver by identifying the Pentecostal baptism of the Holy Spirit (vv. 1-4) with the believer's subsequent experience of entire sanctification, arguing that believers must seek their own personal 'Pentecost' to be cleansed from inward sin and empowered for holy living.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · DENY
“The tradition centers on Acts 2:4, reading the event not merely as unrepeatable salvation-history, but as the normative paradigm for all believers.” - Seventh-day Adventist · DENY
“Consequently, the church applies this chapter by actively praying for and anticipating a corresponding 'latter rain' of the Spirit to empower the final global proclamation of the three angels' messages before Christ's return.”
- Eastern Orthodox · DENY
The outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost represents the theological paradigm for a believer's subsequent reception of entire sanctification.
1 afirmam · 1 negam · 0 qualificam · 10 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (2)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“First, through a redemptive-historical lens, Pentecost is understood not as a repeatable paradigm for individual spiritual experience (a 'second blessing'), but as a unique, epochal event in salvation history inaugurating the new covenant era.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“John Fletcher, in his Checks to Antinomianism, made a critical theological maneuver by identifying the Pentecostal baptism of the Holy Spirit (vv. 1-4) with the believer's subsequent experience of entire sanctification, arguing that believers must seek their own personal 'Pentecost' to be cleansed from inward sin and empowered for holy living.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
Water baptism is a necessary condition performed in order to obtain the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit.
4 afirmam · 1 negam · 0 qualificam · 7 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre MIXEDquem disse o quê (5)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Peter commands them to repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Peter commands repentance and baptism for the remission of sins and the gift of the Spirit.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Philip Melanchthon, in the Apology of the Augsburg Confession, argues that because this promise of grace belongs to infants, they too must be baptized to receive it.” - Baptist · DENY
“Baptists firmly reject baptismal regeneration in verse 38; theologians argue that 'for the remission of sins' means 'with reference to' or 'because of' the remission of sins already granted upon repentance, guarding the doctrine of justification by faith alone.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“The Greek preposition 'eis' in verse 38 is prospective, meaning baptism is performed 'in order to obtain' the remission of sins, not because sins have already been remitted.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Baptism is a memorial and public testimony of a remission of sins that has already been received, rather than the instrumental cause of salvation.
1 afirmam · 4 negam · 0 qualificam · 7 silenciamAntiga OPPOSEReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre MIXEDquem disse o quê (5)
- Catholic · DENY
“Peter's command to repent (translated in the Vulgate and Douay-Rheims as 'do penance') and be baptized grounds the Catholic understanding of Baptism and the Sacrament of Penance for the remission of sins, while the subsequent 'gift of the Holy Spirit' is seen as the biblical basis for the Sacrament of Confirmation.” - Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“Peter commands repentance and baptism for the remission of sins and the gift of the Spirit.” - Lutheran · DENY
“In catechesis and pastoral care, verses 38–39 are frequently utilized to assure parents of the baptismal regeneration of their infants.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Baptists firmly reject baptismal regeneration in verse 38; theologians argue that 'for the remission of sins' means 'with reference to' or 'because of' the remission of sins already granted upon repentance, guarding the doctrine of justification by faith alone.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“J.W. McGarvey championed this grammatical and theological reading against Protestant interpretations that viewed baptism as merely symbolic of an already-achieved salvation.”
- Catholic · DENY
The normative sequence of hearing, repenting, and being baptized establishes the necessity of believers' baptism and precludes the baptism of infants.
2 afirmam · 3 negam · 0 qualificam · 7 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma OPPOSEIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (5)
- Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
“Finally, verses 38-39 are traditionally marshaled in Anglican apologetics to defend the practice of infant baptism; the assurance that the promise is 'unto you, and to your children' aligns with Article XXVII of the Thirty-Nine Articles, which maintains that the baptism of young children is agreeable with the institution of Christ.” - Lutheran · DENY
“Second, the explicit pairing of Baptism with the forgiveness of sins and the Holy Spirit in verse 38, combined with the promise extending to 'your children' in verse 39, serves as a primary confessional locus for infant baptism.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“The declaration that 'the promise is to you and to your children' is seen as an explicit New Testament continuation of the Abrahamic covenant principle, where the children of believers are included in the visible church and are rightful recipients of the covenant sign, a doctrine enshrined in the Westminster Confession (Chapter 28) and the Heidelberg Catechism.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Verses 38 through 41 are universally heralded as the biblical mandate for credobaptism (believers' baptism) and regenerate church membership. The sequence in verse 41—receiving the word, being baptized, and then being added to the church—is read as the normative pattern for Christian initiation and local church polity.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“Acts 2:38 establishes that repentance and hearing the word must chronologically precede baptism, thereby precluding the baptism of infants.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
The promise of the Holy Spirit extending to 'your children' provides scriptural warrant for the inclusion of infants in the covenant community through baptism.
3 afirmam · 2 negam · 0 qualificam · 7 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTEDquem disse o quê (5)
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Finally, verses 38-39 are traditionally marshaled in Anglican apologetics to defend the practice of infant baptism; the assurance that the promise is 'unto you, and to your children' aligns with Article XXVII of the Thirty-Nine Articles, which maintains that the baptism of young children is agreeable with the institution of Christ.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Second, the explicit pairing of Baptism with the forgiveness of sins and the Holy Spirit in verse 38, combined with the promise extending to 'your children' in verse 39, serves as a primary confessional locus for infant baptism.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Acts 2:39 provides New Testament warrant for the inclusion of believers' children in the covenant community and the administration of baptism to them.” - Baptist · DENY
“Where pedobaptist traditions read the promise to 'children' as a continuation of the Abrahamic covenant justifying infant baptism, Baptist theologians like John Gill stress the concluding clause, 'even as many as the Lord our God shall call.' Thus, the promise is restricted to the elect who experience effectual calling, regardless of physical parentage.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · DENY
“Acts 2:38 establishes that repentance and hearing the word must chronologically precede baptism, thereby precluding the baptism of infants.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
The church and the kingdom of God were formally established on the day of Pentecost.
2 afirmam · 0 negam · 2 qualificam · 8 silenciamAntiga LEANING-CONTESTEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (4)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“Catholic tradition receives Acts 2 as the public manifestation of the Church, animated by the Holy Spirit.” - Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
“In the Eastern Orthodox tradition, Acts 2 is the definitive narrative of the Church's full manifestation in history.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“It provides the central appointed readings for the Feast of Pentecost (Whitsunday) in the Book of Common Prayer, celebrating the birth of the Church and the empowering of the Holy Spirit.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“It is read as the historical establishment of the New Testament church and the kingdom of God on earth.”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
God adds individuals directly to the universal church upon their salvation, demonstrating that membership in human denominations is unnecessary.
1 afirmam · 1 negam · 0 qualificam · 10 silenciamAntiga LEANING-CONTESTEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (2)
- Catholic · DENY
“Furthermore, Acts 2:42 serves as a perpetual blueprint for Catholic parish life and ecclesial renewal, emphasizing that true community requires adherence to the Magisterium (apostolic teaching), the Eucharist (breaking of bread), and liturgical prayer.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Verse 47 demonstrates that the Lord adds individuals directly to the church upon their salvation, proving that membership in human denominations is entirely unnecessary and unbiblical.”
- Catholic · DENY
The 'breaking of bread' refers to the Lord's Supper, and its inclusion in the apostolic pattern mandates its weekly observance.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 2 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga LEANING-CONTESTEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (3)
- Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
“Furthermore, the early church's commitment to 'the breaking of bread and prayers' (verse 42) is identified unequivocally with the Eucharistic Liturgy, the core of Orthodox worship.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · QUALIFY
“Acts 2:42 serves as the practical template for church planting and weekly liturgy, reminding churches to prioritize the ordinary means of grace—Word, sacraments, and prayer—over novel or pragmatic methods of church growth.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Alexander Campbell and subsequent leaders argued that 'breaking of bread' refers to the Lord's Supper, and the disciples' steadfast continuation establishes the binding precedent for weekly observance.”
- Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
The early believers' communal sharing of possessions serves as the biblical charter for coenobitic monasticism.
2 afirmam · 1 negam · 1 qualificam · 8 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (4)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“The radical generosity of the first Christians in verses 44 and 45 is invoked in Catholic Social Teaching and monastic traditions to encourage almsgiving, the preferential option for the poor, and detachment from worldly wealth.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The radical sharing of goods (verses 44-45) is highlighted by Chrysostom as a model of voluntary poverty and detachment, which became the foundational paradigm for Orthodox monasticism and a perpetual call to almsgiving for all believers.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Ethically and ascetically, the description of the early believers in Acts 2:44-45 ('had all things common... sold their possessions') serves as the biblical charter for coenobitic (communal) monasticism.” - Lutheran · DENY
“The communal sharing of goods (vv. 44-45) is understood as a voluntary exercise of Christian love in one's vocation, rather than a divine mandate abolishing private property or elevating communal monasticism.”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
The communal sharing of wealth in the early church serves as a binding mandate for Christian social justice and a critique of economic individualism.
1 afirmam · 1 negam · 2 qualificam · 8 silenciamAntiga LEANING-CONTESTEDReforma MIXEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (4)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“John Chrysostom and later Catholic social teaching point to the believers holding all things in common as the ideal of Christian charity and the universal destination of goods.” - Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
“The radical sharing of goods (verses 44-45) is highlighted by Chrysostom as a model of voluntary poverty and detachment, which became the foundational paradigm for Orthodox monasticism and a perpetual call to almsgiving for all believers.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“They view the selling of possessions and distribution according to need not as a temporary historical anomaly, but as a binding critique of modern capitalist individualism and a mandate for Christian social action.” - Lutheran · DENY
“The communal sharing of goods (vv. 44-45) is understood as a voluntary exercise of Christian love in one's vocation, rather than a divine mandate abolishing private property or elevating communal monasticism.”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
The early believers' sharing of possessions was a voluntary act of Christian love that did not abolish private property.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 2 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTEDquem disse o quê (3)
- Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
“The radical sharing of goods (verses 44-45) is highlighted by Chrysostom as a model of voluntary poverty and detachment, which became the foundational paradigm for Orthodox monasticism and a perpetual call to almsgiving for all believers.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“The communal sharing of goods (vv. 44-45) is understood as a voluntary exercise of Christian love in one's vocation, rather than a divine mandate abolishing private property or elevating communal monasticism.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
“The Hutterite branch, articulated by Peter Riedemann, reads verses 44-45 as a mandate for the absolute community of goods, arguing that true spiritual unity necessitates the abolition of private property among believers.”
- Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
The apostolic practice of holding all things in common mandates the absolute community of goods and the rejection of private property for all believers.
0 afirmam · 2 negam · 1 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga LEANING-CONTESTEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTEDquem disse o quê (3)
- Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“The radical sharing of goods (verses 44-45) is highlighted by Chrysostom as a model of voluntary poverty and detachment, which became the foundational paradigm for Orthodox monasticism and a perpetual call to almsgiving for all believers.” - Lutheran · DENY
“The communal sharing of goods (vv. 44-45) is understood as a voluntary exercise of Christian love in one's vocation, rather than a divine mandate abolishing private property or elevating communal monasticism.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
“Meanwhile, other Anabaptist groups (Mennonites, Brethren) read these same verses as a binding ethic of mutual aid, where private ownership remains but is entirely subordinated to the needs of the community.”
- Eastern Orthodox · DENY
Passo 7Renderizar a New Consensus Bible
A partir do texto no idioma original. As tradições documentam a recepção; elas não votam na formulação. Toda formulação contestada que a tradução resolveu está listada abaixo, não oculta.
1And when the day of Pentecost was fulfilled, they were all together at the same place. 2And suddenly there came from heaven a sound like a violent rushing wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting. 3And divided tongues as of fire appeared to them, and it rested upon each one of them. 4And they were all filled with holy spirit and began to speak in other languages, as the Spirit gave them to declare. 5Now there were dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, devout men from every nation under heaven. 6And when this sound occurred, the multitude surged together and was stunned, because they were hearing, each one, them speaking in his own dialect. 7And they were all amazed and marveled, saying to one another: "Look, are not all these who are speaking Galileans? 8And how do we hear, each one in our own dialect in which we were born? 9Parthians and Medes and Elamites, and the inhabitants of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and the Asia, 10both Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya that are around Cyrene, and the visiting Romans, 11Cretans and Arabians—we hear them speaking in our languages the mighty works of God!" 12And they were all amazed and perplexed, saying one to another: "What might this wish to be?" 13But others, sneering, said, "They are steeped in sweet wine." 14But Peter, having stood up with the eleven, lifted his voice and declared to them: "Men, Jews, and all you inhabiting Jerusalem, let this be known to you, and give ear to my words. 15For not as you suppose are these men drunk, for it is the third hour of the day; 16but this is what was spoken through the prophet Joel: 17'And it will be in the last days, says God, I will pour out from my Spirit upon all flesh, and your sons and your daughters will prophesy, and your young men will see visions, and your old men will dream with dreams. 18And indeed, upon my male servants and upon my female servants in those days I will pour out from my Spirit, and they will prophesy. 19And I will give wonders in the heaven above and signs on the earth below: blood, and fire, and vapor of smoke. 20The sun will be turned into darkness and the moon into blood, before the great and manifest day of the Lord comes. 21And it will be, everyone whoever calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved.' 22"Men, Israelites, hear these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested by God to you by works of power and wonders and signs, which God did through him in your midst, just as you yourselves know— 23this one, given over by the determined plan and foreknowledge of God, you took, and by the hand of lawless men, fastening him to a cross, you killed; 24whom God raised up, loosing the pangs of death, because it was not possible for him to be held by it. 25For David says concerning him: 'I foresaw the Lord before my face continually, because he is at my right hand, so that I may not be shaken; 26therefore my heart was glad and my tongue exulted; moreover also my flesh will dwell in hope. 27because you will not abandon my soul into Hades, nor will you give your Holy One to see corruption. 28You made known to me ways of life; you will fill me with gladness with your presence.' 29"Men, brothers, it is permitted to speak with boldness to you concerning the patriarch David, that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is among us until this day. 30Therefore, being a prophet, and knowing that God swore with an oath to him, out of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, to raise up the Christ to sit upon his throne, 31foreseeing this, he spoke concerning the resurrection of the Christ, that neither was his soul abandoned into Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption. 32This Jesus God raised up, of which we all are witnesses. 33Therefore, having been exalted by the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he poured out this which you yourselves now both see and hear. 34For David did not ascend into the heavens, but he says himself: 'The Lord said to my Lord, "Sit at my right hand, 35until I make your enemies a footstool of your feet."' 36Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God made him both Lord and Christ—this Jesus whom you crucified." 37Now upon hearing this, they were pierced to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles: "What should we do, men, brothers?" 38And Peter said to them: "Repent, and let each one of you be baptized upon the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39For the promise is to you, and to your children, and to all those far away, as many as the Lord our God will call to himself." 40And with many other words he testified and exhorted them, saying, "Be saved from this crooked generation." 41So then, those who gladly received his word were baptized, and there were added on that day about three thousand souls. 42And they were persisting in the teaching of the apostles and in the fellowship, and in the breaking of the bread and in the prayers. 43And fear came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were taking place through the apostles. 44And all those believing were together at the same place, and had all things in common; 45and they were selling their possessions and goods, and were distributing them to all, according as anyone had need. 46And daily persisting with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, they were partaking of food in gladness and sincerity of heart, 47praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord was adding those being saved daily together at the same place.
Escolhas feitas — cada disputa que a tradução resolveu
| Versículo | Fonte | Opções | Escolha | Motivo | Cat. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | Καὶ ἐν τῷ | (T) And when, (T) Now, (T) in, (S) And as | And when | accurately renders the temporal phrase introduced by kai. | grammatical |
| v1 | ἡμέραν | (T) day, (T) days | day | matches singular accusative hēmeran in the source text. | textual |
| v1 | συμπληροῦσθαι | (T) was fully come, (T) had, (T) now, (T) being fulfilled, (T) now accomplishing, (T) were accomplished, (S) was fulfilled | was fulfilled | reflects the completion nuance of symplērousthai. | lexical |
| v1 | πεντηκοστῆς ἦσαν πάντες | (T) flattened, (S) Pentecost arrived, all were present | Pentecost arrived, all were present | attempts to preserve some p-alliteration from the Greek sequence pentēkostēs ēsan pantes. | stylistic |
| v1 | ἐπὶ τὸ αὐτό | (T) in one place, (T) at the same place, (S) together at the same place | together at the same place | establishes the exact inclusio phrase that returns in verses 44 and 47. | stylistic |
| v2 | ἦχος ὥσπερ φερομένης πνοῆς βιαίας | (T) flattened, (S) swept from heaven like a violently rushing wind | swept from heaven like a violently rushing wind | captures the auditory impact of the Greek assonance. | stylistic |
| v2 | τὸν οἶκον οὗ | (T) flattened, (S) the house where | the house where | accurately tracks the article-noun-relative construction ton oikon hou. | grammatical |
| v3 | ἐφ᾽ ἕνα ἕκαστον | (T) upon each, (T) one, (T) on, (T) also one, (T) every one, (S) upon each one | upon each one | reflects eph hena hekaston fully. | grammatical |
| v3 | ἐκάθισεν | (T) flattened, (S) preserved singular verb with plural subject | preserved singular verb with plural subject | accurately tracks the singular verb following a plural subject. | grammatical |
| v4 | πνεύματος | (T) Spirit, (T) Ghost | Spirit | uses contemporary standard terminology for pneuma. | lexical |
| v4 | ἑτέραις γλώσσαις | (T) with other tongues, (T) languages, (T) according, (T) in languages, (T) divers according, (S) in other languages, (A) in recognizable foreign languages | in other languages | emphasizes xenolalia as recognized foreign languages. | lexical |
| v4 | ἐδίδου | (T) Spirit gave, (T) was giving, (T) to, (T) Holy Ghost | gave | standard rendering of the imperfect edidou as a simple past narrative. | grammatical |
| v4 | ἀποφθέγγεσθαι | (T) utterance, (T) the ability to speak, (T) to declare, (T) to speak forth, (T) to speak, (S) to declare | to declare | captures apophthengesthai as a weighty, inspired declaration. | lexical |
| v4 | πνεύματος ἁγίου... τὸ πνεῦμα | (T) flattened capitalization, (S) holy spirit... the Spirit | holy spirit... the Spirit | deliberately records the grammatical shift from anarthrous to arthrous. | interpretive |
| v5 | δὲ | (T) Now, (T) And | Now | marks narrative transition appropriately for the postpositive de. | grammatical |
| v5 | εἰς | (T) at, (T) in | in | renders eis indicating dwelling within. | grammatical |
| v5 | εὐλαβεῖς | (T) devout, (T) pious | devout | contemporary standard English for eulabeis. | lexical |
| v5 | ἀπὸ | (T) from, (T) out of | from | renders apo clearly. | grammatical |
| v5 | τὸν οὐρανόν | (T) heaven, (T) the sky, (T) the | heaven | fits the apocalyptic/cosmic scope of the narrative. | lexical |
| v6 | γενομένης δὲ τῆς φωνῆς | (T) was noised abroad, (T) sound heard, (T) having come, (T) having spread, (S) when this sound occurred | when this sound occurred | tracks genēsomenēs tēs phōnēs directly. | lexical |
| v6 | συνεχύθη | (T) were confounded, (T) bewildered, (T) was, (T) in mind, (S) stunned | stunned | renders synechythē with visceral impact. | lexical |
| v6 | λαλούντων | (T) speaking, (T) speak | speaking | translates the participle lalountōn. | grammatical |
| v6 | ἰδίᾳ διαλέκτῳ | (T) own language, (T) proper dialect, (T) dialect, (T) tongue, (S) own dialect | own dialect | translates dialektō literally. | lexical |
| v6 | συνῆλθεν... συνεχύθη | (T) flattened, (S) surged together and was stunned | surged together and was stunned | approximates the syn- prefix alliteration. | stylistic |
| v7 | ἐθαύμαζον | (T) marveled, (T) marvelled, (T) wondered, (T) did wonder | marveled | standard contemporary spelling and register. | lexical |
| v7 | οἱ λαλοῦντες | (T) who, (T) which speak Galileans, (T) that Galilæans, (T) who are speaking, (T) who are speaking Galilaeans, (T) that | who are speaking | accurately renders the participial phrase hoi lalountes. | grammatical |
| v7 | ἰδοὺ | (T) Behold, (T) Lo, (S) Look | Look | maintains the interjection idou without using archaic vocabulary. | stylistic |
| v8 | ἀκούομεν | (T) do, (T) hear, (T) have | do | standard English question formation. | grammatical |
| v8 | ἕκαστος τῇ | (T) every man in, (T) hear everyone, (T) hear each, (T) hear them each, (T) hear, (T) heard, (S) each one in | each one in | directly translates hekastos distributive structure. | grammatical |
| v9 | οἱ κατοικοῦντες | (T) the dwellers in, (T) people from, (T) those dwelling, (T) those who inhabit, (T) inhabitants of | inhabitants of | solid English rendering of hoi katoikountes. | grammatical |
| v9 | τὴν Μεσοποταμίαν... Πόντον καὶ τὴν Ἀσίαν | (T) flattened, (S) the Mesopotamia... Pontus and the Asia | the Mesopotamia... Pontus and the Asia | records the precise article grouping from the source text. | grammatical |
| v10 | κατὰ | (T) about, (T) around, (T) that are along, (T) which adjoin | around | natural contemporary idiom for kata. | lexical |
| v10 | τὰ μέρη τῆς Λιβύης τῆς κατὰ Κυρήνην | (T) flattened, (S) the parts of Libya that are around Cyrene | the parts of Libya that are around Cyrene | clarifies the stacked definite articles in the underlying Greek. | grammatical |
| v11 | Κρῆτες | (T) Cretans, (T) Cretes, (T) Jews also and proselytes | Cretans | follows the verse boundary provided in the explicit source text. | interpretive |
| v11 | τὰ μεγαλεῖα | (T) wonderful works, (T) mighty, (T) great things, (A) mighty works | mighty works | conveys the grandeur of megaleia. | lexical |
| v12 | ἐξίσταντο | (T) amazed, (T) astonished | amazed | consistent with rendering in verse 7. | lexical |
| v12 | διηπόρουν | (T) were in doubt, (T) perplexed, (T) perplexity, (T) wondered | perplexed | captures diēporoun. | lexical |
| v12 | ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον | (T) one to, (T) one, (T) unto, (S) one to another | one to another | standard English rendering of allos pros allon. | grammatical |
| v12 | τί ἄν θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι | (T) meaneth, (T) would, (T) does, (S) might this wish to be | might this wish to be | preserves the idiomatic ti an thelei construction. | grammatical |
| v13 | εἰσίν | (T) They, (T) These men | They | accurate to the supplied subject rather than introducing a noun. | grammatical |
| v13 | γλεύκους | (T) full of new, (T) filled with, (T) sweet | sweet wine | accurate translation of gleukous. | lexical |
| v13 | διαχλευάζοντες | (T) flattened, (S) sneering... sweet wine | sneering... sweet wine | maintains partial alliteration mirroring the Greek. | stylistic |
| v14 | ἀπεφθέγξατο | (T) spoke out to, (T) said unto, (T) spake forth, (T) declared to, (T) spoke forth to, (T) to, (T) spoke to | declared to | fits apophthengomai, reflecting inspired, weighty speech. | lexical |
| v14 | Ἰουδαῖοι | (T) of Judea, (T) Judæa, (T) Jews, (T) Judaea | Jews | translates the formal address vocative exactly. | lexical |
| v14 | ἔστω | (T) be, (T) let | let | natural English framing for third-person imperative. | grammatical |
| v14 | ἐνωτίσασθε | (T) hearken to, (T) listen, (T) give ear unto, (T) harken, (T) give heed, (T) with your ears receive, (S) give ear to | give ear to | captures enōtisasthē closely. | lexical |
| v14 | Σταθεὶς... σὺν τοῖς ἕνδεκα | (T) flattened, (S) having stood up with the eleven | having stood up with the eleven | reflects singular participle grouping Peter with the plural eleven. | grammatical |
| v15 | μεθύουσιν | (T) are not drunken, (T) aren't, (T) full of wine, (T) drunk | drunk | standard modern idiom. | lexical |
| v15 | ὑπολαμβάνετε | (T) ye suppose seeing, (T) you, (T) take, (T) for, (S) suppose | suppose | clear translation of hypolambanete. | lexical |
| v15 | οὐ γὰρ ὡς ὑμεῖς ὑπολαμβάνετε | (T) flattened, (S) For not as you suppose are these men drunk | For not as you suppose are these men drunk | maintains the word order emphasis on 'you'. | stylistic |
| v16 | τὸ εἰρημένον | (T) that which was, (T) hath been, (T) what has been, (S) what was | what was | clear English rendering. | grammatical |
| v16 | διὰ | (T) through, (T) by, (T) of | through | standard for dia with genitive of agency. | grammatical |
| v17 | ἔσται | (T) shall come to pass, (T) be, (T) will be | will be | standard contemporary future translation. | lexical |
| v17 | λέγει ὁ θεός | (T) saith God, (T) says that, (T) that, (T) the Lord | says God | matches ho theos in the underlying source text. | textual |
| v17 | οἱ πρεσβύτεροι | (T) old men shall, (T) will, (T) elders | old men | maintains symmetry with young men. | lexical |
| v17 | ἐνυπνίοις ἐνυπνιασθήσονται | (T) flattened, (S) dream with dreams | dream with dreams | strictly preserves the figura etymologica from the source text. | stylistic |
| v18 | καί γε ἐπὶ | (T) And on, (T) Yes, (T) Yea, (T) also upon, (T) yea even upon, (T) upon, (S) And indeed, upon | And indeed, upon | captures kai ge emphatic particles. | lexical |
| v18 | τοὺς δούλους | (T) servants, (T) men-servants, (T) bondmen, (T) indeed, (S) male servants | male servants | disambiguates gender clearly alongside female servants. | lexical |
| v19 | δώσω | (T) show, (T) shew, (T) give | give | translates dōsō directly. | lexical |
| v19 | τῷ οὐρανῷ | (T) the, (T) heaven, (T) the sky | heaven | maintains cosmic register. | lexical |
| v19 | κάτω | (T) beneath, (T) below | below | pairs well with above. | lexical |
| v19 | ἀτμίδα | (T) vapour, (T) vapor, (T) billows | vapor | more literal rendering of atmida. | lexical |
| v19 | ἐν τῷ οὐρανῷ ἄνω... ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς κάτω | (T) flattened, (S) heaven above... earth below | heaven above... earth below | maintains the spatial chiasm from the Greek. | stylistic |
| v20 | μεταστραφήσεται | (T) turned into, (T) to, (T) changed to | turned into | classic apocalyptic imagery for metastraphēsetai. | lexical |
| v20 | μεγάλην καὶ ἐπιφανῆ | (T) that great and notable, (T) the glorious, (T) the, (T) the coming of the, (T) the gloriously appearing, (T) the manifest, (S) great and manifest | great and manifest | represents epiphanē accurately. | lexical |
| v21 | πᾶς ὃς ἂν | (T) flattened, (S) everyone whoever | everyone whoever | preserves the singular generalizing pronoun string. | stylistic |
| v22 | τὸν Ναζωραῖον | (T) of Nazareth, (T) the Nazarene, (T) the Nazaraean | the Nazarene | translates the title ton Nazōraion directly. | lexical |
| v22 | ἀποδεδειγμένον | (T) approved of, (T) by, (T) borne witness to by, (A) attested by | attested by | strong contemporary verb for apodedegmenon. | lexical |
| v22 | εἰς ὑμᾶς | (T) among, (T) to, (T) unto | to | reflects eis hymas. | grammatical |
| v22 | δυνάμεσιν | (T) mighty works, (T) miracles, (T) works of power | works of power | reflects dynamesin. | lexical |
| v22 | δι᾽ | (T) did by, (T) through, (T) wrought | did through | corresponds to dia. | lexical |
| v23 | τοῦτον... ἔκδοτον λαβόντες | (T) up, (T) Him being delivered, (T) this one, (T) given up, (T) This same up, (S) this one, given over | this one, given over | clearly identifies the object touton. | grammatical |
| v23 | ὡρισμένῃ | (T) determinate, (T) determined | determined | uses modern adjectival form. | lexical |
| v23 | τῇ ὡρισμένῃ βουλῇ καὶ προγνώσει | (T) flattened, (S) the determined plan and foreknowledge | the determined plan and foreknowledge | captures the single definite article binding the two nouns. | grammatical |
| v24 | λύσας | (T) loosed, (T) freed him from, (S) loosing | loosing | maintains the participial syntax and idiom. | lexical |
| v24 | ὠδῖνας | (T) pains, (T) agony, (T) pangs, (T) sorrows | pangs | fits the birth imagery in ōdinas. | lexical |
| v24 | θανάτου | (T) death because, (T) the, (T) inasmuch as, (T) hell as | death | renders thanatou from the explicit source text. | textual |
| v24 | κρατεῖσθαι αὐτὸν ὑπ᾽ αὐτοῦ | (T) held by, (T) holden of it, (T) held by its power, (T) by | held by it | clear translation of krateisthai auton hyp' autou. | grammatical |
| v25 | λέγει εἰς αὐτόν | (T) speaketh concerning, (T) saith, (T) says, (T) saith in regard to, (T) says as to, (S) says concerning | says concerning | renders legei eis auton smoothly. | grammatical |
| v25 | προορώμην | (T) foresaw, (T) saw, (T) beheld | foresaw | translates proorōmēn appropriately in context of prophecy. | lexical |
| v25 | ἐνώπιόν μου διὰ παντός | (T) my face for, (T) me because, (T) because, (S) before my face continually | before my face continually | strictly renders enōpion mou dia pantos. | lexical |
| v25 | ἐκ δεξιῶν | (T) on, (T) at | at | idiomatic for ek dexiōn. | grammatical |
| v25 | ἵνα μὴ | (T) should, (T) may | may | correct subjunctive formulation for purpose clause. | grammatical |
| v26 | ηὐφράνθη | (T) was glad, (T) rejoice, (T) cheered, (T) rejoiced, (T) hath been glad | was glad | direct rendering of ēuphranthē. | lexical |
| v26 | μου | (T) my, (T) any | my | matches the Greek pronoun mou. | textual |
| v26 | ἠγαλλιάσατο | (T) rejoiced, (T) was glad moreover also, (T) and yet, (T) exulted yea more, (T) hath rejoiced, (S) exulted | exulted | gives proper weight to ēgalliasato. | lexical |
| v26 | κατασκηνώσει | (T) shall rest in, (T) also dwell, (T) also will dwell, (T) also on, (T) also | will dwell | translates kataskēnōsei literally. | lexical |
| v26 | καρδία μου... γλῶσσά μου... σάρξ μου | (T) flattened, (S) my heart, my tongue, my flesh | my heart, my tongue, my flesh | preserves the threefold repetition of mou. | stylistic |
| v27 | ὅτι | (T) Because thou wilt, (T) you will, (T) for, (S) because you will | because you will | translates hoti causally. | grammatical |
| v27 | διαφθοράν | (T) corruption, (T) decay | corruption | maintains the Greek-based wordplay on diaphthora highlighted by scholars. | lexical |
| v27 | τὴν ψυχήν μου... τὸν ὅσιόν σου | (T) flattened, (S) my soul... your Holy One | my soul... your Holy One | maintains the structural article balance. | stylistic |
| v28 | ἐγνώρισάς | (T) Thou hast made, (T) You, (T) madest, (T) didst make, (S) You made | You made | modern standard English. | grammatical |
| v28 | πληρώσεις | (T) thou shalt make, (T) You will, (T) fill, (T) wilt fill, (T) wilt, (S) you will fill | you will fill | accurate to the future plērōseis. | grammatical |
| v28 | εὐφροσύνης | (T) full of joy, (T) gladness, (T) with | gladness | accurate for euphrosynēs. | lexical |
| v28 | μετὰ τοῦ προσώπου σου | (T) thy countenance, (T) your presence | your presence | accessible rendering of meta tou prosōpou. | lexical |
| v29 | μετὰ παρρησίας πρὸς ὑμᾶς περὶ | (T) concerning, (T) freely, (T) of, (S) with boldness to you concerning | with boldness to you concerning | precise representation of meta parrēsias and peri. | grammatical |
| v29 | ἐτελεύτησεν | (T) died, (T) is both dead, (T) has died | died | direct translation of aorist eteleutēsen. | grammatical |
| v29 | μνῆμα | (T) tomb, (T) sepulchre, (T) monument, (T) sepulcher | tomb | contemporary standard. | lexical |
| v29 | ἐτελεύτησεν καὶ ἐτάφη | (T) flattened, (S) died and was buried | died and was buried | preserves paired singular verbs connected by kai. | stylistic |
| v30 | εἰδὼς | (T) knowing, (T) knew | knowing | translates eidōs as circumstantial participle. | grammatical |
| v30 | ὅρκῳ ὤμοσεν | (T) flattened, (S) swore with an oath | swore with an oath | preserves the requested figura etymologica. | stylistic |
| v31 | εἰς ᾅδην | (T) did, (T) Hades and, (T) in hell neither, (T) unto Hades nor did, (T) to hades nor did, (T) hades nor, (S) into Hades | into Hades | accurately renders the location. | lexical |
| v33 | ὑψωθεὶς | (T) Therefore being by, (T) therefore exalted, (T) therefore, (T) at, (T) Having been exalted, (T) exalted therefore, (S) Therefore, having been exalted by | Therefore, having been exalted by | clear mapping of the aorist participle. | grammatical |
| v33 | παρὰ | (T) received of the Father, (T) from, (T) been exalted also | from | standard English for para. | grammatical |
| v33 | ἐξέχεεν | (T) has poured out, (T) hath shed forth, (T) poured, (T) was shedding, (S) poured out | poured out | preserves lexical echo with verse 17. | lexical |
| v34 | εἶπεν | (T) to, (T) said unto, (T) saith to, (S) said to | said to | accurate tense and modern preposition. | grammatical |
| v35 | ὑποπόδιον τῶν ποδῶν | (T) flattened, (S) footstool of your feet | footstool of your feet | preserves requested source feature. | stylistic |
| v37 | Ἀκούσαντες | (T) Now when they, (T) And having, (T) had, (S) Now upon hearing this | Now upon hearing this | renders the participle cleanly. | grammatical |
| v37 | εἶπόν τε πρὸς | (T) to, (T) and said unto, (T) they say also to, (S) and said to | and said to | coordinates the narrative verbs naturally. | grammatical |
| v37 | τοὺς λοιποὺς | (T) rest of the, (T) other | rest of the | corresponds to tous loipous. | lexical |
| v37 | κατενύγησαν τὴν καρδίαν | (T) flattened, (S) pierced to the heart | pierced to the heart | preserves the striking source idiom. | stylistic |
| v38 | μετανοήσατε | (T) Repent, (T) ye, (T) Reform, (T) Do penance | Repent | disputed among traditions, but is the majority rendering. | interpretive |
| v38 | βαπτισθήτω ἕκαστος ὑμῶν | (T) baptized every one, (T) each, (T) baptised each, (S) let each one of you be baptized | let each one of you be baptized | maps the singular distributive third person imperative with plural context. | grammatical |
| v38 | λήμψεσθε | (T) ye shall, (T) you will, (T) will, (T) you | you will | modern standard for future tense. | grammatical |
| v39 | τοῖς εἰς μακράν | (T) that are afar, (T) who far, (T) those, (T) who, (T) far, (S) to all those far away | to all those far away | translates tois eis makran cleanly. | grammatical |
| v40 | σώθητε | (T) Save yourselves, (T) Be saved | Be saved | correctly registers the passive voice. | grammatical |
| v40 | σκολιᾶς | (T) perverse, (T) crooked, (T) untoward | crooked | standard meaning of skolios. | lexical |
| v42 | προσκαρτεροῦντες | (T) steadfastly, (T) continued stedfastly, (T) were continuing, (T) persevered, (T) were persevering, (S) were persisting | were persisting | strong durative translation for proskarterountes. | lexical |
| v43 | ἐγίνετο | (T) came upon, (T) on, (T) was | came upon | common expression for egeneto... phobos. | grammatical |
| v43 | διὰ... ἐγίνετο | (T) were done by, (T) through, (T) being through, (T) took place through, (S) were taking place through | were taking place through | emphasizes ongoing imperfect action with dia. | grammatical |
| v44 | οἱ πιστεύοντες | (T) that believed, (T) who, (T) those believing, (T) they | those believing | renders the participial hoi pisteuontes. | grammatical |
| v45 | ὑπάρξεις | (T) goods, (T) the they were selling, (T) substance, (T) they sold | goods | clear modern equivalent for hyparxeis. | lexical |
| v45 | διεμέριζον | (T) parted, (T) distributed, (T) were parting, (T) divided, (S) were distributing | were distributing | matches imperfect tense and context. | lexical |
| v45 | καθότι | (T) according, (T) men | according | avoids unnecessarily supplied words. | grammatical |
| v45 | τις | (T) every man had, (T) anyone, (T) any, (T) any one, (T) any one might have, (T) one, (S) anyone | anyone | accurately maps kathoti an tis. | grammatical |
| v46 | ἀφελότητι | (T) singleness, (T) simplicity, (S) sincerity | sincerity | captures aphelotēti smoothly in modern English. | lexical |
Limites que vale a pena conhecer
- This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
- The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
- The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
- The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
- One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
- The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
- Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
- The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.