← Voltar para João 21 · Página completa de estudo de João 21

Como o consenso para João 21 foi construído

Cada passo do processo, exatamente como foi executado. Nada aqui é editado manualmente: as traduções vieram do banco de dados deste aplicativo, a leitura de cada tradição foi gerada em chamadas isoladas que não veem umas às outras (o isolamento evita a ancoragem; não as torna testemunhas independentes), e o consenso foi sintetizado apenas a partir dessas leituras.

Modelo:: gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)
Gerado:: Oct 9, 2026, 1:03 AM UTC
Method:: claim-audited, source-language-based, family-weighted

Auditoria de consistência entre fases: aprovada — fatos de tradução, aritmética de níveis, vocabulário em prosa e justificativas de Escolhas Feitas verificados entre si e com os textos impressos.

Passo 1Ler a passagem em todas as traduções de domínio público

7 translations, fed to every step. The AI-generated NCB is never a source.

WEB · World English Bible

¹After these things, Jesus revealed himself again to the disciples at the sea of Tiberias. He revealed himself this way. ²Simon Peter, Thomas called Didymus, Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, and two others of his disciples were together. ³Simon Peter said to them, “I’m going fishing.” They told him, “We are also coming with you.” They immediately went out and entered into the boat. That night, they caught nothing. ⁴But when day had already come, Jesus stood on the beach; yet the disciples didn’t know that it was Jesus. ⁵Jesus therefore said to them, “Children, have you anything to eat?” They answered him, “No.” ⁶He said to them, “Cast the net on the right side of the boat, and you will find some.” They cast it therefore, and now they weren’t able to draw it in for the multitude of fish. ⁷That disciple therefore whom Jesus loved said to Peter, “It’s the Lord!” So when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he wrapped his coat around himself (for he was naked), and threw himself into the sea. ⁸But the other disciples came in the little boat (for they were not far from the land, but about two hundred cubits away), dragging the net full of fish. ⁹So when they got out on the land, they saw a fire of coals there, with fish and bread laid on it. ¹⁰Jesus said to them, “Bring some of the fish which you have just caught.” ¹¹Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land, full of one hundred fifty-three great fish. Even though there were so many, the net wasn’t torn. ¹²Jesus said to them, “Come and eat breakfast!” None of the disciples dared inquire of him, “Who are you?” knowing that it was the Lord. ¹³Then Jesus came and took the bread, gave it to them, and the fish likewise. ¹⁴This is now the third time that Jesus was revealed to his disciples after he had risen from the dead. ¹⁵So when they had eaten their breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon, son of Jonah, do you love me more than these?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I have affection for you.” He said to him, “Feed my lambs.” ¹⁶He said to him again a second time, “Simon, son of Jonah, do you love me?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I have affection for you.” He said to him, “Tend my sheep.” ¹⁷He said to him the third time, “Simon, son of Jonah, do you have affection for me?” Peter was grieved because he asked him the third time, “Do you have affection for me?” He said to him, “Lord, you know everything. You know that I have affection for you.” Jesus said to him, “Feed my sheep. ¹⁸Most certainly I tell you, when you were young, you dressed yourself and walked where you wanted to. But when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will dress you and carry you where you don’t want to go.” ¹⁹Now he said this, signifying by what kind of death he would glorify God. When he had said this, he said to him, “Follow me.” ²⁰Then Peter, turning around, saw a disciple following. This was the disciple whom Jesus loved, the one who had also leaned on Jesus’ chest at the supper and asked, “Lord, who is going to betray you?” ²¹Peter, seeing him, said to Jesus, “Lord, what about this man?” ²²Jesus said to him, “If I desire that he stay until I come, what is that to you? You follow me.” ²³This saying therefore went out among the brothers that this disciple wouldn’t die. Yet Jesus didn’t say to him that he wouldn’t die, but, “If I desire that he stay until I come, what is that to you?” ²⁴This is the disciple who testifies about these things, and wrote these things. We know that his witness is true. ²⁵There are also many other things which Jesus did, which if they would all be written, I suppose that even the world itself wouldn’t have room for the books that would be written.

KJV · King James Version

¹After these things Jesus shewed himself again to the disciples at the sea of Tiberias; and on this wise shewed he himself. ²There were together Simon Peter, and Thomas called Didymus, and Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, and two other of his disciples. ³Simon Peter saith unto them, I go a fishing. They say unto him, We also go with thee. They went forth, and entered into a ship immediately; and that night they caught nothing. ⁴But when the morning was now come, Jesus stood on the shore: but the disciples knew not that it was Jesus. ⁵Then Jesus saith unto them, Children, have ye any meat? They answered him, No. ⁶And he said unto them, Cast the net on the right side of the ship, and ye shall find. They cast therefore, and now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes. ⁷Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt his fisher’s coat unto him, (for he was naked,) and did cast himself into the sea. ⁸And the other disciples came in a little ship; (for they were not far from land, but as it were two hundred cubits,) dragging the net with fishes. ⁹As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread. ¹⁰Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now caught. ¹¹Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so many, yet was not the net broken. ¹²Jesus saith unto them, Come and dine. And none of the disciples durst ask him, Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord. ¹³Jesus then cometh, and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish likewise. ¹⁴This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his disciples, after that he was risen from the dead. ¹⁵So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. ¹⁶He saith to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my sheep. ¹⁷He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep. ¹⁸Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not. ¹⁹This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him, Follow me. ²⁰Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee? ²¹Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man do? ²²Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me. ²³Then went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die; but, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? ²⁴This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true. ²⁵And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.

ASV · American Standard Version

¹After these things Jesus manifested himself again to the disciples at the sea of Tiberias; and he manifested himself on this wise. ²There were together Simon Peter, and Thomas called Didymus, and Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, and two other of his disciples. ³Simon Peter saith unto them, I go a fishing. They say unto him, We also come with thee. They went forth, and entered into the boat; and that night they took nothing. ⁴But when day was now breaking, Jesus stood on the beach: yet the disciples knew not that it was Jesus. ⁵Jesus therefore saith unto them, Children, have ye aught to eat? They answered him, No. ⁶And he said unto them, Cast the net on the right side of the boat, and ye shall find. They cast therefore, and now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes. ⁷That disciple therefore whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is the Lord. So when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt his coat about him (for he was naked), and cast himself into the sea. ⁸But the other disciples came in the little boat (for they were not far from the land, but about two hundred cubits off), dragging the net full of fishes. ⁹So when they got out upon the land, they see a fire of coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread. ¹⁰Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now taken. ¹¹Simon Peter therefore went up, and drew the net to land, full of great fishes, a hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so many, the net was not rent. ¹²Jesus saith unto them, Come and break your fast. And none of the disciples durst inquire of him, Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord. ¹³Jesus cometh, and taketh the bread, and giveth them, and the fish likewise. ¹⁴This is now the third time that Jesus was manifested to the disciples, after that he was risen from the dead. ¹⁵So when they had broken their fast, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of John, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs. ¹⁶He saith to him again a second time, Simon, son of John, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Tend my sheep. ¹⁷He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of John, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep. ¹⁸Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not. ¹⁹Now this he spake, signifying by what manner of death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him, Follow me. ²⁰Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; who also leaned back on his breast at the supper, and said, Lord, who is he that betrayeth thee? ²¹Peter therefore seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man do? ²²Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me. ²³This saying therefore went forth among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not unto him, that he should not die; but, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? ²⁴This is the disciple that beareth witness of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his witness is true. ²⁵And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself would not contain the books that should be written.

YLT · Young's Literal Translation

¹After these things did Jesus manifest himself again to the disciples on the sea of Tiberias, and he did manifest himself thus: ²There were together Simon Peter, and Thomas who is called Didymus, and Nathanael from Cana of Galilee, and the <FI>sons<Fi> of Zebedee, and two others of his disciples. ³Simon Peter saith to them, `I go away to fish;' they say to him, `We go--we also--with thee;' they went forth and entered into the boat immediately, and on that night they caught nothing. ⁴And morning being now come, Jesus stood at the shore, yet indeed the disciples did not know that it is Jesus; ⁵Jesus, therefore, saith to them, `Lads, have ye any meat?' ⁶they answered him, `No;' and he said to them, `Cast the net at the right side of the boat, and ye shall find;' they cast, therefore, and no longer were they able to draw it, from the multitude of the fishes. ⁷That disciple, therefore, whom Jesus was loving saith to Peter, `The Lord it is!' Simon Peter, therefore, having heard that it is the Lord, did gird on the outer coat, (for he was naked,) and did cast himself into the sea; ⁸and the other disciples came by the little boat, for they were not far from the land, but as it were about two hundred cubits off, dragging the net of the fishes; ⁹when, therefore, they came to the land, they behold a fire of coals lying, and a fish lying on it, and bread. ¹⁰Jesus saith to them, `Bring ye from the fishes that ye caught now;' ¹¹Simon Peter went up, and drew the net up on the land, full of great fishes, an hundred fifty and three, and though they were so many, the net was not rent. ¹²Jesus saith to them, `Come ye, dine;' and none of the disciples was venturing to inquire of him, `Who art thou?' knowing that it is the Lord; ¹³Jesus, therefore, doth come and take the bread and give to them, and the fish in like manner; ¹⁴this <FI>is<Fi> now a third time Jesus was manifested to his disciples, having been raised from the dead. ¹⁵When, therefore, they dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, `Simon, <FI>son<Fi> of Jonas, dost thou love me more than these?' he saith to him, `Yes, Lord; thou hast known that I dearly love thee;' he saith to him, `Feed my lambs.' ¹⁶He saith to him again, a second time, `Simon, <FI>son<Fi> of Jonas, dost thou love me?' he saith to him, `Yes, Lord; thou hast known that I dearly love thee;' he saith to him, `Tend my sheep.' ¹⁷He saith to him the third time, `Simon, <FI>son<Fi> of Jonas, dost thou dearly love me?' Peter was grieved that he said to him the third time, `Dost thou dearly love me?' and he said to him, `Lord, thou hast known all things; thou dost know that I dearly love thee.' Jesus saith to him, `Feed my sheep; ¹⁸verily, verily, I say to thee, When thou wast younger, thou wast girding thyself and wast walking whither thou didst will, but when thou mayest be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another will gird thee, and shall carry <FI> thee<Fi> whither thou dost not will;' ¹⁹and this he said, signifying by what death he shall glorify God; and having said this, he saith to him, `Be following me.' ²⁰And Peter having turned about doth see the disciple whom Jesus was loving following, (who also reclined in the supper on his breast, and said, `Sir, who is he who is delivering thee up?') ²¹Peter having seen this one, saith to Jesus, `Lord, and what of this one?' ²²Jesus saith to him, `If him I will to remain till I come, what--to thee? be thou following me.' This word, therefore, went forth to the brethren that that disciple doth not die, ²³yet Jesus did not say to him, that he doth not die, but, `If him I will to remain till I come, what--to thee?' ²⁴this is the disciple who is testifying concerning these things, and he wrote these things, and we have known that his testimony is true. ²⁵And there are also many other things--as many as Jesus did--which, if they may be written one by one, not even the world itself I think to have place for the books written. Amen.

Darby · Darby Translation

¹After these things Jesus manifested himself again to the disciples at the sea of Tiberias. And he manifested [himself] thus. ²There were together Simon Peter, and Thomas called Didymus, and Nathanael who was of Cana of Galilee, and the [sons] of Zebedee, and two others of his disciples. ³Simon Peter says to them, I go to fish. They say to him, We also come with thee. They went forth, and went on board, and that night took nothing. ⁴And early morn already breaking, Jesus stood on the shore; the disciples however did not know that it was Jesus. ⁵Jesus therefore says to them, Children, have ye anything to eat? They answered him, No. ⁶And he said to them, Cast the net at the right side of the ship and ye will find. They cast therefore, and they could no longer draw it, from the multitude of fishes. ⁷That disciple therefore whom Jesus loved says to Peter, It is the Lord. Simon Peter therefore, having heard that it was the Lord, girded his overcoat [on him] (for he was naked), and cast himself into the sea; ⁸and the other disciples came in the small boat, for they were not far from the land, but somewhere about two hundred cubits, dragging the net of fishes. ⁹When therefore they went out on the land, they see a fire of coals there, and fish laid on it, and bread. ¹⁰Jesus says to them, Bring of the fishes which ye have now taken. ¹¹Simon Peter went up and drew the net to the land full of great fishes, a hundred and fifty-three; and though there were so many, the net was not rent. ¹²Jesus says to them, Come [and] dine. But none of the disciples dared inquire of him, Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord. ¹³Jesus comes and takes the bread and gives it to them, and the fish in like manner. ¹⁴This is already the third time that Jesus had been manifested to the disciples, being risen from among [the] dead. ¹⁵When therefore they had dined, Jesus says to Simon Peter, Simon, [son] of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He says to him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I am attached to thee. He says to him, Feed my lambs. ¹⁶He says to him again a second time, Simon, [son] of Jonas, lovest thou me? He says to him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I am attached to thee. He says to him, Shepherd my sheep. ¹⁷He says to him the third time, Simon, [son] of Jonas, art thou attached to me? Peter was grieved because he said to him the third time, Art thou attached to me? and said to him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I am attached to thee. Jesus says to him, Feed my sheep. ¹⁸Verily, verily, I say to thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst where thou desiredst; but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and bring thee where thou dost not desire. ¹⁹But he said this signifying by what death he should glorify God. And having said this, he says to him, Follow me. ²⁰Peter, turning round, sees the disciple whom Jesus loved following, who also leaned at supper on his breast, and said, Lord, who is it that delivers thee up? ²¹Peter, seeing him, says to Jesus, Lord, and what [of] this [man]? ²²Jesus says to him, If I will that he abide until I come, what [is that] to thee? Follow thou me. ²³This word therefore went out among the brethren, That disciple does not die. And Jesus did not say to him, He does not die; but, If I will that he abide until I come, what [is that] to thee? ²⁴This is the disciple who bears witness concerning these things, and who has written these things; and we know that his witness is true. ²⁵And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which if they were written one by one, I suppose that not even the world itself would contain the books written.

Webster · Webster Bible

¹After these things Jesus showed himself again to the disciples at the sea of Tiberias: and in this manner did he show [himself]. ²There were together Simon Peter, and Thomas called Didymus, and Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, and the [sons] of Zebedee, and two others of his disciples. ³Simon Peter saith to them, I go a fishing. They say to him, We also go with thee. They went forth, and entered into a boat immediately; and that night they caught nothing. ⁴But when the morning had now come, Jesus stood on the shore: but the disciples knew not that it was Jesus. ⁵Then Jesus saith to them, Children, have ye any victuals? They answered him, No. ⁶And he said to them, Cast the net on the right side of the boat, and ye shall find. They cast therefore, and now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes. ⁷Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith to Peter, It is the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt [on] his fisher's coat, (for he was naked) and cast himself into the sea. ⁸And the other disciples came in a little boat (for they were not far from land, but as it were two hundred cubits) dragging the net with fishes. ⁹As soon then as they had come to land, they saw a fire of coals there, and fish laid upon them, and bread. ¹⁰Jesus saith to them, Bring of the fish which ye have now caught. ¹¹Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great fishes, a hundred and fifty and three: and notwithstanding there were so many, yet the net was not broken. ¹²Jesus saith to them, Come [and] dine. And none of the disciples durst ask him, Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord. ¹³Jesus then cometh, and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish likewise. ¹⁴This is now the third time that Jesus showed himself to his disciples, after he had risen from the dead. ¹⁵So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon [son] of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith to him, Yes, Lord: thou knowest that I love thee. He saith to him, Feed my lambs. ¹⁶He saith to him again the second time, Simon [son] of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith to him, Yes, Lord: thou knowest that I love thee. He saith to him, Feed my sheep. ¹⁷He saith to him the third time, Simon [son] of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved, because he said to him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said to him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith to him, Feed my sheep. ¹⁸Verily, verily, I say to thee, When thou wast young, thou didst gird thyself and walk whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry [thee] whither thou wouldst not. ¹⁹This he spoke, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith to him, Follow me. ²⁰Then Peter turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved, following; (who also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, who is he that betrayeth thee?) ²¹Peter seeing him, saith to Jesus, Lord, and what [shall] this man [do]? ²²Jesus saith to him, If I will that he shall tarry till I come, what [is that] to thee? Follow thou me. ²³Then this saying went abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not to him, He shall not die; but, if I will that he shall tarry till I come, what [is that] to thee? ²⁴This is the disciple who testifieth of these things, and wrote these things: and we know that his testimony is true. ²⁵And there are also many other things which Jesus did, which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that would be written. Amen.

DRC · Douay-Rheims (Challoner)

¹After this, Jesus shewed himself again to the disciples at the sea of Tiberias. And he shewed himself after this manner. ²There were together Simon Peter, and Thomas, who is called Didymus, and Nathanael, who was of Cana of Galilee, and the sons of Zebedee, and two others of his disciples. ³Simon Peter saith to them: I go a fishing. They say to him: We also come with thee. And they went forth, and entered into the ship: and that night they caught nothing. ⁴But when the morning was come, Jesus stood on the shore: yet the disciples knew not that it was Jesus. ⁵Jesus therefore said to them: Children, have you any meat? They answered him: No. ⁶He saith to them: Cast the net on the right side of the ship, and you shall find. They cast therefore; and now they were not able to draw it, for the multitude of fishes. ⁷That disciple therefore whom Jesus loved, said to Peter: It is the Lord. Simon Peter, when he heard that it was the Lord, girt his coat about him, (for he was naked,) and cast himself into the sea. ⁸But the other disciples came in the ship, (for they were not far from the land, but as it were two hundred cubits,) dragging the net with fishes. ⁹As soon then as they came to land, they saw hot coals lying, and a fish laid thereon, and bread. ¹⁰Jesus saith to them: Bring hither of the fishes which you have now caught. ¹¹Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land, full of great fishes, one hundred and fifty-three. And although there were so many, the net was not broken. ¹²Jesus saith to them: Come, and dine. And none of them who were at meat, durst ask him: Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord. ¹³And Jesus cometh and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish in like manner. ¹⁴This is now the third time that Jesus was manifested to his disciples, after he was risen from the dead. ¹⁵When therefore they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter: Simon son of John, lovest thou me more than these? He saith to him: Yea, Lord, thou knowest that I love thee. He saith to him: Feed my lambs. ¹⁶He saith to him again: Simon, son of John, lovest thou me? He saith to him: Yea, Lord, thou knowest that I love thee. He saith to him: Feed my lambs. ¹⁷He said to him the third time: Simon, son of John, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved, because he had said to him the third time: Lovest thou me? And he said to him: Lord, thou knowest all things: thou knowest that I love thee. He said to him: Feed my sheep. ¹⁸Amen, amen I say to thee, when thou wast younger, thou didst gird thyself, and didst walk where thou wouldst. But when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and lead thee whither thou wouldst not. ¹⁹And this he said, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had said this, he saith to him: Follow me. ²⁰Peter turning about, saw that disciple whom Jesus loved following, who also leaned on his breast at supper, and said: Lord, who is he that shall betray thee? ²¹Him therefore when Peter had seen, he saith to Jesus: Lord, and what shall this man do? ²²Jesus saith to him: So I will have him to remain till I come, what is it to thee? follow thou me. ²³This saying therefore went abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die. And Jesus did not say to him: He should not die; but, So I will have him to remain till I come, what is it to thee? ²⁴This is that disciple who giveth testimony of these things, and hath written these things; and we know that his testimony is true. ²⁵But there are also many other things which Jesus did; which, if they were written every one, the world itself, I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written.

Passo 2Each eligible tradition reads the chapter — 12 voting profiles across 3 families

Perfis gerados por IA isolados que não veem uns aos outros. Cientes do gênero literário e honestos sobre material escasso.

Ancient Communions · The undivided-church and pre-Reformation episcopal traditions.

Catholicaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Roman Catholic tradition drawing on both Latin AND Eastern Catholic sources — and actually showing the Eastern dimension, not merely promising it: Scripture within Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium (the Catechism, the Latin Fathers, Augustine, Aquinas and the scholastics, the councils) together with the Eastern Catholic churches in communion with Rome and the Greek and Syriac Fathers they share. Sacramental and typological reading. Distinguish teaching shared across the whole Catholic communion from emphases specific to the Latin or to the Eastern Catholic churches.

Significado imediato — The narrative of John 21 serves as an epilogue to the Gospel, detailing a post-resurrection appearance of Jesus by the Sea of Tiberias. It features a miraculous catch of 153 fish by seven disciples acting under the direction of the unrecognized risen Christ. Upon recognizing the Lord, Peter swims to shore, where Jesus has prepared a breakfast of bread and fish over a charcoal fire. The narrative culminates in a direct dialogue between Jesus and Simon Peter, where Jesus asks him three times about his love and commands him to feed His sheep. The chapter concludes with a prophecy of Peter's martyrdom and clarifies a rumor concerning the Beloved Disciple's lifespan, explicitly affirming this disciple's witness as the source of the written Gospel.

Reception — The Catholic tradition reads this chapter as a cornerstone for ecclesiology, particularly concerning the Petrine ministry. Both Latin and Eastern Fathers recognize Jesus' threefold questioning of Peter (vv. 15-17) as a deliberate, medicinal reversal of his threefold denial during the Passion. Cyril of Alexandria and Augustine both teach that Peter's apostolic mandate is healed and restored through this repeated profession of love. For the Catholic communion, Jesus' commands to feed His lambs and sheep (vv. 15-17) form the scriptural foundation for the primacy of the Pope. The First Vatican Council explicitly cites these verses to define that Christ conferred upon Peter the jurisdiction of supreme shepherd over the whole flock. The Second Vatican Council reaffirms this Petrine primacy while integrating it with the collegiality of all bishops. Eastern Catholic churches affirm this Petrine ministry of unity, drawing on shared Greek Fathers like John Chrysostom, who notes that Christ entrusts Peter with the care and presidency of the brethren, though Eastern theology characteristically emphasizes that this primacy operates within a synodal framework. Furthermore, the miraculous catch of fish is read typologically. Augustine famously contrasts this catch with the one in Luke 5: there the nets tear, representing the Church in history mixed with good and bad; here, the net is unbroken (v. 11), symbolizing the perfect unity of the eschatological Church. Augustine mathematically allegorizes the 153 fish as the sum of integers from 1 to 17 (10 for the Decalogue, 7 for the Holy Spirit), representing the totality of the elect.

Application — Liturgically, the bread and fish laid on the coals by Jesus (vv. 9, 13) are read with deep Eucharistic resonance, echoing the earliest Christian iconography found in the Roman catacombs where fish and bread signify the Eucharist. Pastorally, the chapter provides a paradigm for the Sacrament of Penance, showing that Christ restores the fallen believer not with condemnation, but by eliciting love and renewing their mission. Furthermore, it models the exercise of authority in the Church: papal and episcopal power are fundamentally defined as pastoral service, feeding the flock out of love for Christ, which reminds the hierarchy that the sheep belong to Jesus, not to the shepherds.

Autoridades citadas:Cyril of Alexandria — Commentary on John · Augustine — Tractates on the Gospel of John · First Vatican Council — Pastor Aeternus · Second Vatican Council — Lumen Gentium · John Chrysostom — Homilies on the Gospel of St. John

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)

✓ Jesus' threefold questioning of Peter is a medicinal reversal of his threefold d
✓ Christ's command to feed His sheep establishes the supreme pastoral jurisdiction
✓ The unbroken net symbolizes the indestructible unity of the eschatological Churc
✓ Peter is entrusted with the presidency and care of the brethren, establishing a
✓ The meal of bread and fish prepared by Jesus carries Eucharistic significance.

Eastern Orthodoxaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Eastern Orthodox tradition: Scripture within Holy Tradition and the consensus of the Fathers (patristic consensus). Emphases on theosis, the liturgy, the Septuagint text, apophatic mystery over precise definition, and the seven Ecumenical Councils.

Significado imediato — The chapter recounts a post-resurrection appearance of Jesus to seven disciples at the Sea of Tiberias. After a night of fruitless fishing, Jesus directs them to a miraculous catch, leading the beloved disciple to recognize him. Jesus provides a meal of bread and fish cooked over charcoal. In a direct exchange, Jesus asks Simon Peter three times if he loves him, commanding him to 'feed my sheep' and predicting Peter's future martyrdom. The chapter concludes with Jesus' enigmatic comment about the beloved disciple's fate, an attestation of the beloved disciple's authorship, and a concluding reflection on the inexhaustible number of Jesus' deeds.

Reception — Eastern Orthodox tradition reads this chapter as deeply sacramental, ecclesiological, and apophatic. The meal of fish and bread prepared on coals (verses 9-13) is received as a demonstration of the physical reality of the bodily resurrection and as a profound Eucharistic symbol, prefiguring the eschatological banquet. The unbroken net holding one hundred fifty-three fish (verse 11) is commonly understood by Greek Fathers, such as Cyril of Alexandria, to symbolize the unity and catholicity of the Church, which gathers the fullness of the nations without being torn by schism. The threefold questioning of Peter (verses 15-17) is a central text for Orthodox ecclesiology. Read in the context of patristic consensus, the threefold confession of love is understood as the medicinal healing of Peter's threefold denial during the Passion. The command to 'feed my sheep' is received not as the conferral of exclusive, universal supremacy over the rest of the apostles (as in Roman Catholic papal claims), but as Peter's restoration to the apostolic college. Cyril of Alexandria and John Chrysostom both emphasize that this pastoral commission to shepherd the flock is shared equally by all the apostles and their successors, the bishops. Finally, the concluding verse (verse 25), which asserts that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written, serves as a scriptural anchor for Orthodox apophatic theology. It signifies that the mystery of the incarnate Word and His divine acts cannot be exhaustively comprehended by human intellect or confined to written text, thus necessitating the living Holy Tradition of the Church.

Application — Liturgically, this chapter is highly prominent in the Byzantine rite. It provides the texts for two of the eleven Resurrectional Matins Gospels (the Eothina): John 21:1-14 is read as the Tenth Eothinon, and John 21:15-25 is read as the Eleventh Eothinon, anchoring the Sunday morning celebration of the Resurrection. Ascetically and pastorally, Peter's grief and subsequent restoration serve as the ultimate paradigm for the mystery of repentance (metanoia) and the sacrament of confession, demonstrating that no fall is beyond the restorative grace of Christ.

Autoridades citadas:John Chrysostom — Homilies on the Gospel of John · Cyril of Alexandria — Commentary on John · Liturgical Tradition — Octoechos

auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)

✓ The meal of bread and fish provided by Jesus is interpreted as a Eucharistic sym
✓ The unbroken net is read as a symbol of the Church's indivisible unity even as i
✓ Peter's threefold affirmation of love is understood as a healing of his prior th
✓ The command to 'feed my sheep' is received as a pastoral mandate shared by all b
✓ The declaration that the world could not contain the books written about Jesus g
✓ The chapter is divided into the Tenth and Eleventh Eothina readings for Sunday M

Oriental Orthodoxaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Oriental Orthodox tradition (Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac): Scripture within the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils and the miaphysite Fathers (Athanasius, Cyril of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch). Deeply liturgical, ascetic, and typological reading; some of these churches hold wider canons.

Significado imediato — John 21 serves as an epilogue to the Gospel, detailing Jesus' third post-resurrection appearance to His disciples. Set at the Sea of Tiberias, it recounts a night of unsuccessful fishing that is reversed at dawn by Jesus' command to cast the net on the right side of the boat, resulting in a massive catch of 153 fish. Jesus then shares a breakfast of bread and fish with them, prepared over a charcoal fire. In the subsequent dialogue, Jesus asks Peter three times if he loves Him, countering Peter's earlier threefold denial, and commissions him to 'feed my sheep.' The chapter concludes with a prophecy of Peter's eventual martyrdom and a clarification regarding a rumor about the Beloved Disciple's longevity, affirming the truthfulness of the Gospel's witness.

Reception — The Oriental Orthodox tradition relies profoundly on the typological exegesis of Cyril of Alexandria to read this chapter. In his *Commentary on John*, the narrative is understood as a grand allegory of the Church's eschatological mission. The fruitless night of fishing represents the time before the Resurrection—or the labor of the prophets under the Law—which yielded little without Christ. The dawn and the command to cast the net on the 'right side' signify the post-Resurrection era, where the apostolic preaching gathers the righteous into the Kingdom. Cyril interprets the 153 fish numerologically: 100 represents the fullness of the Gentile converts (the perfect number indicating totality), 50 signifies the remnant of Israel saved by grace, and the number 3 points to the Holy Trinity, to whose glory the entire Church is gathered. The net that does not break, despite the immense catch, is a vital image demonstrating the indestructible, dogmatic unity of the one Church. The restoration of Peter is central to miaphysite pastoral theology. Cyril and later fathers like Severus of Antioch emphasize that Christ did not merely forgive Peter; He required a threefold confession of love to specifically and surgically heal the wounds of his threefold denial. This establishes that pastoral authority in the Church is fundamentally predicated on a tested, intense love for the Lord, and it confirms the complete restoration of fallen humanity through repentance.

Application — Liturgically, this chapter is highly prominent during the Paschal season (the Holy Fifty Days in the Coptic and Ethiopian rites), read to assure the faithful of the physical reality of Christ’s resurrected presence and to emphasize the ongoing apostolic mandate. Ascetically, Peter's restoration is constantly invoked as a paradigm of hope. Priests and believers are taught that no denial or sin is beyond repair if met with a sincere, threefold confession of love. Furthermore, the mysterious meal of bread and fish prepared on the charcoal fire is revered as an icon of the Eucharist, reminding the faithful that it is the risen Christ Himself who continually feeds His Church.

Autoridades citadas:Cyril of Alexandria — Commentary on John · Severus of Antioch — Cathedral Homilies

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)

✓ The night of fruitless fishing represents the era before the Resurrection, while
✓ The 153 fish typologically represent the fullness of the Gentiles (100), the rem
✓ The net remaining untorn despite the multitude of fish symbolizes the unbroken u
✓ Jesus' threefold questioning of Peter deliberately heals his earlier threefold d
✓ The chapter is read during the Paschal season to emphasize the reality of the Re

Reformation Traditions · The magisterial churches of the sixteenth-century Reformation.

Anglican / Episcopalaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Anglican tradition (including the Episcopal Church): Scripture read with tradition and reason (Hooker); the Book of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles; a comprehensiveness spanning evangelical, anglo-catholic, and broad/progressive readings — name that spectrum where the passage has been read across it.

Significado imediato — John 21 functions as an epilogue to the Gospel, detailing a post-resurrection appearance by the Sea of Tiberias. It features a miraculous catch of fish by seven disciples, a breakfast prepared by Jesus on the shore, the threefold restoration and pastoral commissioning of Peter ('Feed my sheep'), a prediction of Peter's martyrdom, and a clarification regarding the destiny of the Beloved Disciple. The chapter concludes by authenticating the Beloved Disciple's testimony as the source of the Gospel and acknowledging the inexhaustible nature of Jesus' deeds.

Reception — In the Anglican tradition, John 21 is a foundational text for understanding pastoral ministry, apostolic authority, and the sacraments. The threefold charge to Peter (vv. 15-17) is deeply embedded in the Book of Common Prayer's Ordinal, particularly in the ordering of Priests and consecration of Bishops, where it anchors the Anglican understanding of ordained ministry as a pastoral, self-sacrificial feeding of Christ's flock. Historically, English Reformers such as John Jewel engaged these verses to counter Roman Catholic claims of exclusive Petrine supremacy; they argued that Christ’s command to 'feed my sheep' was a universal apostolic commission shared by all faithful bishops and presbyters. Across the tradition's comprehensiveness, interpretations flourish: Evangelicals focus on the grace of Peter’s personal restoration following his earlier denials; Anglo-Catholics, such as William Temple, highlight the profound Eucharistic resonance of the meal of bread and fish (vv. 9-13) and the intimate link between love for Christ and the pastoral office; while Broad Church readers often view the unbroken net of 153 fish (v. 11) as signifying the Church's inclusive, global mission and its capacity to hold diversity in unity.

Application — Anglicans apply this chapter most visibly in ordination liturgies, where the Bishop charges ordinands to 'seek for Christ's sheep that are dispersed abroad.' Pastorally, Peter's restoration is utilized in the reconciliation of penitents, illustrating that human failure does not negate one's calling or Christ's grace. The differing trajectories of Peter and the Beloved Disciple (vv. 20-22) are frequently invoked in spiritual direction to emphasize that God calls individuals to diverse vocations—some to active leadership or suffering, others to contemplative witness—and that believers are commanded to 'follow me' rather than compare their paths with others.

Autoridades citadas:Thomas Cranmer (compiler) — The Book of Common Prayer (The Ordinal) · John Jewel — Apology of the Church of England · William Temple — Readings in St. John's Gospel

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)

✓ The command to 'feed my sheep' is the primary scriptural basis for the pastoral
✓ The charge to Peter is understood not as establishing a monarchical papacy, but
✓ The meal of bread and fish provided by Jesus on the shore is interpreted as havi
✓ The unbroken net containing a multitude of fish symbolizes the Church's inclusiv
✓ Jesus' differing words to Peter and the Beloved Disciple demonstrate that Christ

Lutheranaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Lutheran tradition (the Book of Concord): the law–gospel distinction, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura held with the ecumenical creeds, the theology of the cross, and sacramental realism.

Significado imediato — John 21 provides an epilogue to the Gospel, detailing Jesus' third post-resurrection appearance to the disciples by the Sea of Tiberias. The narrative describes a miraculous catch of fish, a breakfast prepared by Jesus on the shore, a poignant dialogue in which Jesus questions Peter's love three times and commands him to feed his sheep, a prediction of Peter's martyrdom, and a clarifying exchange regarding the future of the Beloved Disciple, concluding with a testimony to the Gospel's truth and the inexhaustibility of Christ's deeds.

Reception — Within the Lutheran tradition, the reception of John 21 is heavily concentrated on verses 15-17 due to their central role in ecclesiological controversies. Roman Catholic theology historically used Christ's command to Peter—'Feed my sheep'—to assert papal supremacy and universal jurisdiction. The Lutheran Confessions, specifically Philip Melanchthon in the 'Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope,' forcefully reject this interpretation. Melanchthon argues that 'feeding' simply means preaching the Gospel and ruling the church by the Word, a mandate given equally to all pastors, thereby denying that this text confers any unique temporal or spiritual monarchy upon Peter. Theologically, the passage is read through the law-gospel distinction: Peter's threefold denial under the terror of the Law is met with Christ's threefold question and mandate, delivering the Gospel of complete restoration. Furthermore, Martin Luther's homiletical reception of verses 21-22 emphasizes the doctrine of vocation. When Jesus tells Peter, 'What is that to thee? Follow thou me,' Luther reads a divine directive against comparing crosses; each believer is given a distinct calling and a specific cross to bear in following Christ.

Application — Lutheranism applies this chapter directly to the theology of the cross and the Office of the Holy Ministry. Verses 15-17 are frequently read at the ordination and installation of pastors, reminding them that their sole authority and duty is to feed Christ's flock with the pure Gospel, motivated by love for the Lord. Pastorally, the chapter is invoked to comfort those burdened by grave sin; it stands as a prime example of Christ seeking out the fallen to speak a word of absolution and restoration. Believers are also taught to apply Christ's words 'Follow me' to their daily lives, embracing their unique vocational stations without coveting the seemingly easier paths or different spiritual gifts granted to others.

Autoridades citadas:Philip Melanchthon — Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope · Martin Luther — Church Postil

auditoria em nível de alegação (3 verificações)

✓ The command 'feed my sheep' establishes the pastoral duty to preach the Word and
✓ Christ's threefold questioning restores Peter by applying the Gospel of forgiven
✓ Jesus' response regarding the Beloved Disciple's fate instructs believers to att

Reformed / Presbyterianaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Reformed tradition (Calvin; the Westminster Standards; the Heidelberg and Belgic confessions): the sovereignty of God and covenant theology, a redemptive-historical reading of Scripture, and the regulative principle.

Significado imediato — In the immediate narrative context of this epilogue, the resurrected Jesus appears to seven disciples by the Sea of Tiberias. He directs a miraculous catch of 153 fish, prepares a breakfast of bread and fish for them, and proves the physical reality of his resurrected body. Jesus then deliberately restores Peter, whose threefold denial is reversed by a threefold profession of love, accompanied by the command to feed Christ's sheep. Jesus foretells the manner of Peter's martyrdom and gently rebukes Peter for inquiring about the fate of the 'disciple whom Jesus loved.' The chapter closes by affirming the truthfulness of this disciple's testimony and stating that the complete deeds of Jesus are far too numerous to be contained in written books.

Reception — The Reformed tradition reads John 21 with a strong emphasis on the grace of restoration, the nature of pastoral ministry, the sovereignty of divine providence, and the sufficiency of Scripture. Historically, verses 15-17 ('Feed my sheep') served as a major battleground between Reformed theologians and Roman Catholic apologists. Where the latter interpreted this passage as establishing papal primacy and universal jurisdiction, John Calvin and subsequent Reformed divines argued that Christ was simply restoring Peter to the apostolic office he had jeopardized through his threefold denial. The threefold questioning corresponds symmetrically to the threefold denial, acting as a public rehabilitation. For the Reformed, the command to 'feed' is the fundamental mandate for all Christian pastors: to nourish the flock with the preached Word of God, rather than to exercise lordly dominion. Reformed interpreters also draw heavily on verses 21-22 regarding God's sovereign providence. When Peter questions what will happen to John, Jesus replies, 'What is that to thee? follow thou me.' The tradition sees here a profound instruction on divine sovereignty: God appoints different crosses, lifespans, and callings to different believers, and it is the duty of the Christian to submit to their own calling rather than inquiring into God's secret will for others. Finally, verse 25—the assertion that the world could not contain the books if all Jesus did were written—is received as an affirmation of the sufficiency of Scripture. Calvin argued that God accommodated His revelation to human capacity, purposefully omitting exhaustive details so that believers would have exactly what is sufficient and necessary for faith, avoiding both overwhelming volume and reliance on unwritten tradition.

Application — In application, Reformed pastors use this chapter to comfort fallen believers with the assurance that true repentance is met with Christ's restoring grace, no matter the severity of the failure. The passage forms a central part of Reformed ministerial training and ordination, emphasizing that the supreme duty of the pastor is to 'feed the sheep' through the faithful exposition of Scripture. Additionally, believers are counseled from Jesus' words to Peter in verse 22 to practice contentment with their own providential lot, focusing on their personal obedience ('follow thou me') rather than comparing their trials or blessings with those of other Christians.

Autoridades citadas:John Calvin — Commentary on the Gospel according to John · John Calvin — Commentary on the Gospel according to John · John Calvin — Commentary on the Gospel according to John

auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)

✓ Christ's threefold question to Peter was designed to restore him to the pastoral
✓ The command to 'feed my sheep' directs pastors to nourish the church with the Wo
✓ Believers are called to faithfully follow Christ in their own divinely appointed
✓ The vast number of unwritten deeds of Christ demonstrates that God provided a su

Free-Church & Revival Traditions · Believers'-church, revival, and restorationist movements.

Baptistaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Baptist tradition (e.g. the 1689 Second London Confession, the Baptist Faith & Message — note the range): believers' baptism, congregational polity, liberty of conscience, a memorial reading of the ordinances, and strong emphasis on personal conversion and biblical authority.

Significado imediato — John 21 records Jesus' third post-resurrection manifestation to his disciples by the Sea of Tiberias. The narrative details a miraculous catch of fish, a breakfast prepared by Jesus, and a focused dialogue with Simon Peter where Jesus asks three times about Peter's love and commissions him to feed the flock. Jesus then indicates the manner of Peter's future martyrdom and corrects a misunderstanding regarding the Beloved Disciple's lifespan, concluding with an affirmation of the written testimony's truth.

Reception — Reading canonically, the tradition connects Jesus' three-fold questioning of Peter (vv. 15-17) to Peter's three-fold denial recorded earlier in John 18, viewing this as a deliberate act of grace and pastoral restoration. Baptists strongly reject hierarchical interpretations of verses 15-17 that claim Peter was granted supreme jurisdictional authority over the universal church. Instead, expositors like John Gill read 'Feed my sheep' as establishing the model for local congregational ministry, where all true pastors are called to nourish the flock with the preached Word and the ordinances. Furthermore, the concluding verses (vv. 24-25) are received as an affirmation of biblical authority and sufficiency; while Christ's deeds were inexhaustible, the written testimony is entirely sufficient to establish true faith and practice.

Application — In Baptist pastoral theology, verses 15-17 are regularly applied to ministers, emphasizing that the primary qualification for undershepherds is a deep, personal love for Christ, and their primary duty is preaching the Word to the local congregation. For the individual believer, Jesus' rebuke in verse 22 ('what is that to thee? follow thou me') is frequently preached as a mandate for individual discipleship and personal accountability, urging believers to pursue their own obedience to Christ without undue comparison to the callings, blessings, or trials of others.

Autoridades citadas:John Gill — Exposition of the Old and New Testaments · Charles Spurgeon — Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)

✓ Jesus questions Peter's love three times and commands him to feed His lambs and
✓ The three-fold questioning corresponds to Peter's earlier three-fold denial in J
✓ The command to feed the sheep establishes the duty of local pastors to preach th
✓ Jesus' instruction to follow Him regardless of the Beloved Disciple's fate under
✓ The assertion that the world could not contain the books if everything were writ

Methodist / Wesleyan / Holinessaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Wesleyan-Holiness tradition: prevenient grace and free response, sanctification and entire sanctification / Christian perfection, the Wesleyan quadrilateral (Scripture primary, with tradition, reason, and experience), and warm-hearted practical piety.

Significado imediato — In the immediate narrative, John 21 recounts a post-resurrection appearance of Jesus at the Sea of Tiberias. After the disciples fish all night and catch nothing, the unrecognized Jesus directs them to a miraculous catch. Recognizing the Lord, they share a meal of fish and bread on the shore. Jesus then leads Simon Peter through a threefold profession of love, corresponding to Peter's earlier threefold denial, and commissions him to care for the flock ('Feed my sheep'). The chapter concludes with a prophecy of Peter's martyrdom and a clarification regarding the Beloved Disciple's distinct path, ending with an affirmation of the Gospel's truthfulness and the limitless nature of Jesus' deeds.

Reception — The Wesleyan tradition reads John 21 as a profound text on restoring grace and the nature of Christian love. John Wesley's 'Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament' sees Christ's questioning as a demand for a love of personal, warm attachment. Wesley distinguishes the pastoral commands: 'Feed my lambs' (v. 15) refers to the weak and young in faith, while 'Feed my sheep' (vv. 16-17) refers to adult, strong believers. Adam Clarke's 'Commentary on the Bible' famously highlights the transition in the Greek terms for love (agapao and phileo) in verses 15-17, observing that Peter, stripped of his former self-reliance, humbly responds with a word signifying deep affectionate friendship rather than claiming a superior, self-generated devotion. In the broader Holiness tradition, Peter's restoration here is viewed as the crucial intermediate step between his failure at the crucifixion and his subsequent sanctification, demonstrating prevenient and restoring grace preparing the heart for the fullness of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost.

Application — Within the tradition, this chapter inextricably links devotion to Jesus with warm-hearted practical piety. Love for Christ cannot remain an abstract feeling; it must be materialized in the active feeding and tending of his flock, driving the church's commitment to pastoral care, evangelism, and social service. Furthermore, Jesus' gentle but firm rebuke to Peter regarding the Beloved Disciple, 'What is that to thee? follow thou me' (v. 22), is frequently applied in Wesleyan preaching as a call to personal consecration. It warns believers against spiritual comparison and distraction, insisting that the primary duty of every Christian is to pursue holiness and follow Christ's distinct calling for their own lives.

Autoridades citadas:John Wesley — Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament · Adam Clarke — Commentary on the Bible · John Wesley — Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)

✓ Jesus' commands distinguish between caring for 'lambs' as those weak in faith an
✓ The difference in the Greek terms for love used by Jesus and Peter highlights Pe
✓ Peter's restoration in this chapter is viewed in Holiness circles as the necessa
✓ True love for Christ is inextricably bound to practical piety and active service
✓ Jesus' instruction to Peter not to worry about the Beloved Disciple is a call fo

Anabaptist / Mennoniteaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Anabaptist tradition (Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite): a Jesus-centered reading with the Sermon on the Mount as normative, believers' baptism, nonviolence and nonresistance, simple living, communal discernment, and the church as a visible community distinct from worldly power.

Significado imediato — The chapter functions as an epilogue to the Gospel, narrating Jesus' appearance to seven disciples at the Sea of Tiberias as they return to their former trade of fishing. Jesus directs a miraculous catch of 153 fish and hosts a lakeside breakfast of bread and fish for them. Following the meal, Jesus engages in a pointed, restorative dialogue with Peter, asking him three times about his love and commissioning him to 'Feed my sheep' and 'Tend my lambs.' Jesus then predicts the manner of Peter's death, indicating he will stretch out his hands and be led where he does not wish to go, concluding with the command, 'Follow me.' When Peter inquires about the fate of the Beloved Disciple, Jesus redirects him to his own personal mandate of discipleship.

Reception — In Anabaptist reception, this chapter provides foundational texts for two core theological themes: radical discipleship (Nachfolge) and the theology of the suffering church. The repeated command 'Follow me' (John 21:19, 22) is read as the defining characteristic of the Christian life, requiring personal obedience regardless of circumstances or the paths of others. Thieleman J. van Braght's 'Martyrs Mirror' extensively invokes Jesus' prediction of Peter being led where he does not wish to go (John 21:18-19) to frame Peter as a prototypical martyr, connecting the apostles' suffering to the persecution of nonresistant Anabaptists. Furthermore, Menno Simons utilized Jesus' charge to 'Feed my sheep' (John 21:15-17) to define the nature of true pastoral ministry. For Menno and early Anabaptists, authentic shepherds are motivated by a supreme love for Christ and employ spiritual care rather than the coercive power or worldly status claimed by state-church clergy.

Application — Anabaptist communities apply John 21 practically in their approaches to church discipline, leadership, and peacemaking. Jesus' threefold restoration of Peter, who had denied him three times, is viewed as a definitive model for restorative justice and reconciliation within the congregation. Rather than viewing discipline merely as punitive exclusion, the goal is the loving restoration of the erring member; contemporary commentators like Willard Swartley note that Jesus addresses failure with an invitation to renewed communal responsibility (John 21:15-17). The chapter is frequently utilized in ordination and commissioning services, reminding leaders that pastoral authority is rooted in sacrificial love and a willingness to follow the suffering Christ, rather than in institutional power.

Autoridades citadas:Thieleman J. van Braght — Martyrs Mirror · Menno Simons — Foundation of Christian Doctrine · Willard Swartley — Believers Church Bible Commentary: John

auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)

✓ Jesus appears to the disciples by the sea, orchestrates a miraculous catch, and
✓ Jesus restores Peter by questioning his love three times and commissioning him t
✓ Jesus' prediction of Peter's future is understood as a prophecy of martyrdom tha
✓ The command to feed the sheep establishes that true pastoral authority relies on
✓ Jesus' command 'Follow me' is the absolute mandate for Christian discipleship, p
✓ The interaction between Jesus and Peter serves as a practical model for restorat

Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal tradition (Assemblies of God, Church of God, and kindred bodies): the present continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine healing, and expectancy of God's present action, read within Nicene Trinitarian faith. Do NOT attribute Word-of-Faith / prosperity or later neo-charismatic distinctives to classical Pentecostalism generally.

Significado imediato — The immediate narrative of John 21 concludes the Gospel with a post-resurrection appearance at the Sea of Tiberias. Seven disciples, having caught nothing after a night of fishing, are directed by the unrecognized Jesus to cast their net on the right side, resulting in a massive catch. Recognizing him, Peter swims ashore to find Jesus has prepared a breakfast of fish and bread. Jesus then formally restores Peter through a threefold questioning of his love, directly countering Peter's threefold denial, and commissions him to feed his sheep. Jesus predicts Peter's eventual martyrdom and addresses Peter's distraction regarding the Beloved Disciple by emphasizing individual calling. The chapter ends with an editorial note validating the testimony and hyperbolically declaring that the world could not contain the books required to record all of Jesus' deeds.

Reception — Classical Pentecostal reception of this chapter emphasizes the dynamic, ongoing nature of Jesus' ministry. Verse 25 is often read not merely as historical hyperbole, but as a theological statement of continuationism. Pentecostal scholars have argued that the inexhaustible acts of Jesus described here set the trajectory for His continuing miraculous works through the Holy Spirit in the early church and the modern era. The restoration of Peter is also highly significant in Pentecostal pastoral theology. Peter's transition from devastating failure to the commissioned, Spirit-empowered preacher of Acts is viewed as the paradigm for grace and restoration. His threefold commissioning grounds all future charismatic ministry in a primary, foundational love for Christ rather than mere spiritual gifting. Furthermore, the miraculous catch is frequently interpreted as a model for evangelistic mission: human effort without divine direction yields nothing, but obedience to the present, speaking Jesus brings a miraculous harvest.

Application — In Pentecostal practice, this chapter is deeply pastoral and missional. Pastors frequently use verses 15-17 in altar calls focused on restoration, inviting those who have backslidden or failed in ministry to hear Jesus asking 'Do you love me?' and to receive fresh commissioning. The instruction to cast the net on the right side is applied to church planting and evangelism, encouraging congregations to listen for the present voice of the Spirit rather than relying on their own human strategies. Finally, verse 25 is invoked in testimonies and healing services to build expectancy; preachers will declare that Jesus is still writing his acts today, encouraging believers to expect signs, wonders, and divine interventions in their own lives just as he performed them in the Gospels.

Autoridades citadas:Jon Ruthven — On the Cessation of the Charismata · French L. Arrington — Life in the Spirit New Testament Commentary

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)

✓ Jesus directs the disciples to a miraculous catch of fish and provides them with
✓ Jesus restores Peter through a threefold inquiry of his love and commissions him
✓ The declaration that the world could not contain the books of Jesus' deeds serve
✓ Peter's restoration establishes the pastoral paradigm that past failures do not
✓ The command to cast the net is applied in missional practice to encourage relian

Seventh-day Adventistaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Seventh-day Adventist tradition: the seventh-day Sabbath, the great-controversy theme, conditional immortality, sanctuary theology, and a historicist reading of prophecy.

Significado imediato — In its immediate narrative context, John 21 recounts the risen Jesus appearing to seven disciples by the Sea of Tiberias. After a night of fruitless fishing, Jesus directs them to a miraculous catch, echoing their initial calling. During a shoreline breakfast, Jesus restores Peter, asking him three times about his love, counteracting Peter's previous threefold denial. Christ then commands Peter to tend His flock, predicts Peter's future martyrdom, and rebukes Peter's curiosity about John's fate by emphasizing personal discipleship and pointing toward His future coming.

Reception — Adventist reception, heavily shaped by Ellen G. White's 'The Desire of Ages', reads this chapter as a masterclass in restorative grace and gospel commission. The miraculous catch (John 21:3-6) is interpreted as a lesson that human effort, no matter how experienced, is useless in the gospel enterprise without Christ's explicit direction. The restoration of Peter (John 21:15-17) is viewed through the lens of character transformation—a crucial theme in the Adventist understanding of the great controversy. White notes that Peter's former self-sufficiency was broken; his threefold confession required him to rely entirely on Christ's reading of his heart, contrasting sharply with his earlier boasts. Furthermore, Christ's response concerning John (John 21:22-23) is understood as a vital reorientation from human comparison toward the literal Second Advent, a central pillar of Adventist eschatology, emphasizing that the believer's primary duty is to 'follow' Jesus regardless of the varied destinies of others.

Application — Adventists apply this chapter extensively in pastoral theology and church life. Christ's specific injunction to 'Feed my lambs' (John 21:15) is frequently utilized to underscore the church's sacred duty toward children, youth, and newly baptized converts, demanding that ministers prioritize their spiritual education and protection. Furthermore, Christ's gentle approach to the erring Peter is upheld as the definitive model for church discipline and reconciliation; leaders are taught to restore the fallen with tender, probing questions rather than harsh condemnation. The concluding command to 'Follow me' (John 21:22) is preached as a call to unconditional, individual obedience in the face of the imminent advent, warning believers against being distracted by the spiritual paths or perceived shortcomings of their peers.

Autoridades citadas:Ellen G. White — The Desire of Ages · Ellen G. White — The Desire of Ages · Ellen G. White — Gospel Workers · Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, Vol. 5 — Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary

auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)

✓ The disciples' failure to catch fish at night, followed by success at Christ's w
✓ Jesus interrogates Peter three times to match his three denials, drawing out a c
✓ The instruction to 'feed my lambs' mandates that the church give special priorit
✓ Christ's reference to His return redirects the disciple's focus from comparing e

Restorationist / Churches of Christaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Restoration Movement tradition (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches — formally non-creedal): restore New Testament Christianity, 'speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent,' reading by direct command, apostolic example, and necessary inference; baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; the weekly Lord's Supper.

Significado imediato — The narrative recounts Jesus' third post-resurrection appearance to his disciples at the Sea of Tiberias. It details a miraculous catch of fish, a breakfast prepared by Jesus, and his subsequent dialogue with Peter. Jesus questions Peter's love three times, corresponding to his prior denials, and commissions him to feed and tend his sheep, prophesying Peter's future martyrdom. When Peter asks about the fate of the Beloved Disciple, Jesus redirects him to personal discipleship, leading to a clarification by the author regarding a rumor of his own immortality. The chapter concludes by affirming the truthfulness of the testimony and the intentional selectivity of the written record.

Reception — In the Restoration Movement, this chapter is received with a strong focus on personal accountability and the sufficiency of the biblical text. John 21:22 ('what is that to thee? follow thou me') is a characteristic text in Restorationist thought for emphasizing individual obedience to Christ's commands regardless of the actions, traditions, or destinies of others. J.W. McGarvey and Philip Y. Pendleton, in 'The Fourfold Gospel', highlight this verse as Christ's rebuke of meddlesome curiosity, establishing that each believer's primary duty is strict personal adherence to the Master. Furthermore, the concluding verse (John 21:25) regarding the unwritten acts of Jesus is foundational for the tradition's doctrine of biblical sufficiency. B.W. Johnson, in 'The People's New Testament', argues that the Gospels are not exhaustive biographies but select testimonies containing everything necessary to produce faith and govern the church. Therefore, the tradition rejects speculative theology based on what Christ might have done, insisting on speaking only where the written text speaks. The command to 'feed my sheep' (John 21:15-17) is also canonically linked to the ongoing role of local elders (pastors) in overseeing the congregation, distinguishing the permanent work of local shepherding from the temporary apostolic office.

Application — Application in Churches of Christ frequently centers on Jesus' rebuke in verse 22, urging individuals during evangelistic appeals and sermons not to delay their own obedience (such as baptism) out of concern for unbaptized relatives or the differing practices of other denominations. The mandate is straightforward: 'Follow thou me.' Additionally, the chapter is used pastorally to assure believers that failure (like Peter's) can be met with restoration and renewed usefulness in the local church, provided there is a return to loving obedience. Finally, verse 25 is invoked in Bible classes to remind members to be content with the biblical pattern as given, resisting the urge to add to the silence of Scripture by inventing practices not explicitly authorized by the written word.

Autoridades citadas:J.W. McGarvey and Philip Y. Pendleton — The Fourfold Gospel · B.W. Johnson — The People's New Testament

auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)

✓ Jesus' redirection of Peter emphasizes that individual discipleship and obedienc
✓ The admission that not all of Jesus' deeds were written underscores the Restorat
✓ The command 'what is that to thee? follow thou me' is applied evangelistically t
✓ Peter's reinstatement is applied pastorally to demonstrate that repentance and l

Passo 3Painéis sem direito a voto e apêndice comparativo

Estes fundamentam as notas e a tradução, e são relatados aqui, mas nunca são contabilizados na votação.

Academic textual-historical analysisaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Academic textual-historical analysis: philology and the original-language text, textual criticism, ancient Near Eastern (and, for the NT, Greco-Roman) context, literary genre and form, composition and dating debates, and reception history. Describe scholarly positions and their evidence without confessional commitment. This panel informs the textual notes and the rendering; it is never a church vote.

Significado imediato — The text presents a post-resurrection narrative at the Sea of Tiberias. Jesus reveals himself to seven disciples, directs a miraculous catch of 153 fish, and shares a breakfast of fish and bread. Jesus then engages Simon Peter in a threefold dialogue, asking if Peter loves him and commanding him to feed and tend his sheep, followed by a prediction of Peter's eventual martyrdom. The narrative then addresses a rumor circulating among the brothers that the Beloved Disciple would not die, clarifying that Jesus only posed a hypothetical condition. The chapter concludes with a first-person plural attestation to the truthfulness of the Beloved Disciple's written testimony and a hyperbolic statement about the unwritten deeds of Jesus.

Reception — In academic historical-critical analysis, this chapter is overwhelmingly regarded as an appendix or epilogue added to the Gospel, which reaches a natural literary and theological conclusion at 20:30-31. Scholars such as Rudolf Bultmann have argued that the chapter was appended by an ecclesiastical redactor to rehabilitate Peter's authority and integrate Johannine and Petrine traditions. A major focus of historical reconstruction concerns verses 20-23. Raymond E. Brown posits that these verses function as a redactional apologetic to address a crisis in the Johannine community: the historical death of the Beloved Disciple before the Parousia, which seemingly contradicted a circulating belief based on a misunderstanding of Jesus's words. Thus, the text distinguishes between what Jesus actually said and the community's misinterpretation. Another significant philological debate centers on the threefold questioning of Peter and the shifting use of the Greek verbs for love (agapao and phileo) and tending (bosko and poimaino). While older exegetical traditions often drew sharp theological distinctions between these terms, modern scholars like D.A. Carson argue that this reflects a characteristic Johannine stylistic variation (synonymy) rather than a substantive semantic shift, noting that Peter's grief is provoked by the third repetition of the question itself. Furthermore, the plural attestation in verse 24 is critically analyzed as the voice of the Johannine community or editors validating the tradition, distinct from the primary author.

Application — Academic application primarily involves textual criticism and translation methodology. Lexicographers and translators apply the findings on Johannine synonymy to caution against over-translating the shift between agapao and phileo in modern versions, often treating them as functional equivalents in this context. Additionally, redaction critics use this chapter pedagogically to model how early Christian communities preserved, edited, and appended traditions to address unfolding historical realities, such as the delay of the Parousia and the passing of the apostolic generation.

Autoridades citadas:Raymond E. Brown — The Gospel According to John (XIII-XXI) · Rudolf Bultmann — The Gospel of John: A Commentary · D.A. Carson — The Gospel According to John

auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)

✓ The narrative details a post-resurrection appearance involving a miraculous catc
✓ Scholars widely classify the chapter as an epilogue or appendix added after the
✓ The clarification regarding the Beloved Disciple is historically reconstructed a
✓ The variation between the Greek verbs agapao and phileo is analyzed as character
✓ Translators apply philological analysis to avoid over-translating the lexical sh

Jewish interpretationmaterial escassoaudit ✓

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Jewish interpretation of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible books only; do not treat the New Testament as Scripture, and address it only historically if at all). Distinguish rabbinic (Talmud, Midrash), medieval (Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and the classical mefarshim), and modern (including critical and denominational) voices rather than presenting one uniform Jewish position. This panel informs, and is reported, but never a Christian church vote.

Significado imediato — In its immediate literary context, this chapter is recognized as the epilogue to the Gospel of John. It narrates a post-resurrection appearance of Jesus at the Sea of Galilee (Tiberias), a miraculous catch of fish, a breakfast shared with the disciples, the rehabilitation of Peter through a threefold questioning, and a concluding discussion regarding the varying fates of Peter and the Beloved Disciple.

Reception — Because the Gospel of John is part of the Christian New Testament, it is entirely outside the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) and holds no canonical, theological, or halakhic authority within Judaism. Historically, Jewish tradition has not engaged with this text except occasionally in medieval and early modern polemics. In contemporary times, however, modern Jewish historical scholarship examines the New Testament to understand first-century Jewish life and the early Jesus movement. For example, in *The Jewish Annotated New Testament*, Adele Reinhartz approaches John 21 from a literary and historical perspective. She highlights that the chapter is widely recognized by scholars as a later redactional addition appended to the original conclusion of the Gospel in chapter 20. She notes that its primary narrative functions are to rehabilitate Peter after his earlier denials and to explain the unexpected death of the Beloved Disciple, ensuring that his testimony remains the foundational authority for the Johannine community. The setting at the Sea of Tiberias and the details of the fishing economy are viewed as reflecting the historical realities of first-century Galilee.

Application — As a New Testament text, John 21 has no application, liturgical use, or role in Jewish religious life, prayer, or practice.

Autoridades citadas:Adele Reinhartz — The Jewish Annotated New Testament

auditoria em nível de alegação (2 verificações)

✓ The text is part of the New Testament and possesses no canonical, theological, o
✓ Modern Jewish historical scholarship understands the chapter as a later appendix

Apêndice comparativo — fora da lista niceno-trinitariana (Latter-day Saint, Jehovah's Witnesses)

Latter-day Saint

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Latter-day Saint reading (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints): the Bible read alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, with living prophets and continuing revelation, and the Joseph Smith Translation where relevant. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.

Significado imediato — The chapter recounts Jesus' third post-resurrection appearance to His disciples, occurring at the Sea of Tiberias. Following a miraculous catch of fish, Jesus shares a meal with them and questions Peter three times regarding his love, commissioning him to 'feed my sheep.' Jesus prophesies Peter's eventual martyrdom and gives an enigmatic response regarding the Beloved Disciple's fate, leading to a rumor that this disciple would not die. The Gospel concludes with an assertion of the text's truthfulness and a declaration that Jesus did many other unrecorded things.

Reception — In Latter-day Saint theology, this chapter is pivotal for understanding the doctrine of translated beings and the nature of apostolic calling. The exchange regarding the Beloved Disciple (John 21:22-23) is explicitly clarified in Latter-day Saint scripture. According to Joseph Smith in Doctrine and Covenants Section 7 (a revelation received when Smith and Oliver Cowdery inquired about this exact biblical passage), John asked for and was granted power over death. The tradition teaches he became a 'translated being,' permitted to tarry on earth to minister and bring souls to Christ until the Second Coming, a status similar to the Three Nephites in the Book of Mormon. Furthermore, Peter's decision to 'go a fishing' (John 21:3) and the subsequent dialogue (John 21:15-17) are read as a defining transition in Peter's ministry. Elder Jeffrey R. Holland has interpreted Peter's return to fishing as a temporary retreat to his former life because he lacked clear direction after the Resurrection. Christ's threefold questioning is viewed as the ultimate apostolic mandate, teaching Peter that true love for the Savior requires permanently forsaking earthly nets to preside over and shepherd the Church. Finally, John 21:25 is frequently cited as scriptural proof that the Bible is a fragmentary record, establishing the theological necessity for an open canon and continuing revelation. Bruce R. McConkie utilized this verse to demonstrate that the Bible was never intended to contain all of God's words or Jesus' earthly deeds.

Application — Latter-day Saints apply Christ's injunction to 'feed my sheep' as the foundational mandate for 'ministering' (the Church's localized, lay pastoral care program). Members are taught that the primary way to demonstrate love for the Savior is through practical, spiritual, and temporal service to their fellow congregants and neighbors. Additionally, Jesus' counsel to Peter regarding John—'what is that to thee? follow thou me' (John 21:22)—is frequently utilized in Church curriculum as a warning against comparing one's own spiritual journey, Church callings, or earthly trials with those of others, urging members to focus entirely on their own individual discipleship.

Autoridades citadas:Joseph Smith — Doctrine and Covenants (Section 7) · Jeffrey R. Holland — The First Great Commandment (2012 General Conference) · Bruce R. McConkie — Doctrinal New Testament Commentary

Jehovah's Witnesses

Lente fornecida ao modelo:Jehovah's Witness reading (Watch Tower Society): attention to the divine name, God's Kingdom as a real government, conditional immortality, and a non-Trinitarian Christology. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.

Significado imediato — In John 21, the resurrected Jesus appears to seven of his disciples at the Sea of Tiberias. After they spend a night of fruitless fishing, a man on the shore directs them to cast their net on the right side, resulting in a miraculous catch. Recognizing the man as the Lord through this miracle, the disciples come ashore to find breakfast prepared. Following the meal, Jesus specifically addresses Peter, asking him three times about his love and instructing him to feed and shepherd his sheep, thereby restoring him after his three previous denials. Jesus then predicts the manner of Peter's martyrdom and, when asked about the disciple whom Jesus loved, states that his will for John's future is not Peter's concern. The chapter concludes with a statement on the vastness of Jesus' unrecorded deeds.

Reception — Jehovah's Witnesses read this chapter as key evidence regarding the nature of Jesus' resurrection. Because their theology holds that Jesus was resurrected as a spirit creature (a doctrine primarily grounded in passages like 1 Peter 3) rather than in his physical human body, they teach that he materialized temporary fleshly bodies to make himself visible to his disciples. This framework is seen as resolving why the disciples did not initially recognize him on the shore (John 21:4) and why they 'dared not' ask who he was (John 21:12)—they recognized him by his characteristic actions, miracles, and demeanor, not by his physical facial features, which differed from his pre-death body ('Insight on the Scriptures'). The dialogue with Peter (John 21:15-17) is viewed as a loving restoration rather than the establishment of papal primacy. By allowing Peter to affirm his love three times, corresponding to his three denials, Jesus reinstates Peter to heavy responsibilities as a shepherd, while maintaining that all apostles were equal in the congregation. Furthermore, Jesus' statement about John remaining 'until I come' (John 21:22) is understood to have been fulfilled when John survived the other apostles to receive the visions of Revelation, which vividly depicted Jesus' future coming in Kingdom power.

Application — In application, Jehovah's Witnesses draw heavily on Jesus' command to 'feed my sheep' as the mandate for Christian overseers (elders). They teach that appointed men must show deep love for Jesus by tenderly caring for the congregation, serving as under-shepherds who protect and spiritually feed the flock ('The Watchtower'). Additionally, Jesus' humility in cooking and serving breakfast (John 21:9-13) is highlighted as a model for all Christians, especially those in positions of oversight, to perform lowly tasks for their spiritual brothers. The immense catch of fish is also used to encourage Witnesses in their evangelizing, reinforcing trust that Jesus directs and blesses the global preaching work even when human efforts initially seem unproductive.

Autoridades citadas:Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — The Watchtower

Passo 4Estabelecer a base no idioma original

A tradução é construída a partir do texto fonte, não da maioria em inglês.

Base textual — Greek New Testament (Critical text, SBLGNT/NA28 tradition)

Nomes divinos — Kyrios (Lord), Theos (God)

Variantes sinalizadas

v3: Some manuscripts read ἀνέβησαν (went up) instead of ἐνέβησαν (entered).
v15: Textus Receptus reads Ἰωνᾶ (Jonas) instead of Ἰωάννου (John). This applies to verses 16 and 17 as well.
v16: Some manuscripts read προβάτια (little sheep) instead of πρόβατα (sheep).
v25: Verse 25 was originally omitted by the scribe of Codex Sinaiticus, though added by a later corrector.

Características que a tradução deve preservar

v1: (c) Demonstrative 'Μετὰ ταῦτα' (After these things); (f) Repetition of 'ἐφανέρωσεν' (manifested) twice in the verse.
v2: (c) Definite article pattern distinguishing the group: 'ὁ λεγόμενος' (the one called), 'ὁ ἀπὸ' (the one from), 'οἱ τοῦ' (the ones of).
v3: (d) Number shift from singular 'ὑπάγω' (I go) by Peter to plural 'ἐρχόμεθα' (we come) by the disciples.
v4: (f) Repetition of the name 'Ἰησοῦς' (Jesus) framing the verse.
v5: (h) Interrogative particle 'μή' (expects a negative answer, e.g., 'you do not have..., do you?').
v6: (f) Repetition of the root verb for cast: imperative 'βάλετε' followed by narrative 'ἔβαλον'.
v7: (c) Demonstrative 'ὁ μαθητὴς ἐκεῖνος' (that disciple); (f) Refrain 'ὃν ἠγάπα ὁ Ἰησοῦς' (whom Jesus loved); (g) Divine name 'ὁ κύριός' (the Lord) repeated twice.
v8: (c) Diminutive definite article 'τῷ πλοιαρίῳ' (the little boat) contrasted with the larger boat in verse 3.
v9: (a) Cognate participle construction: 'κειμένην' (lying) and 'ἐπικείμενον' (lying upon).
v10: (c) Definite article 'τῶν ὀψαρίων' (the fishes), referring back to the specific type of fish in verse 9.
v11: (c) Definite article repetition 'τὸ δίκτυον' (the net).
v12: (h) Interjection 'δεῦτε' (Come); (g) Divine name 'ὁ κύριός' (the Lord).
v13: (c) Definite articles 'τὸν ἄρτον' (the bread) and 'τὸ ὀψάριον' (the fish), pointing back to the specific bread and fish of verse 9.
v14: (c) Demonstrative 'τοῦτο' (this); (f) Repetition of 'ἐφανερώθη' (was manifested), completing an inclusio (e) with verse 1.
v15: (a) Cognate 'ἠρίστησαν' (they breakfasted) linking to 'ἀριστήσατε' in verse 12; (f) Start of a three-part refrain structure; (b) Synonym play between 'ἀγαπᾷς' (do you love/agape) and 'φιλῶ' (I love/affection); (g) Divine name 'κύριε' (Lord).
v16: (f) Continuation of the three-part refrain ('δεύτερον'); (b) Continued synonym play 'ἀγαπᾷς'/'φιλῶ' and shift from 'ἀρνία' (lambs) to 'πρόβατά' (sheep); (g) Divine name 'κύριε' (Lord).
v17: (f) Conclusion of the refrain ('τὸ τρίτον'); (b) Climax of synonym play: Jesus shifts to 'φιλεῖς' matching Peter's 'φιλῶ', causing Peter's grief; shift from 'ποίμαινε' (shepherd) back to 'βόσκε' (feed); (g) Divine name 'κύριε' (Lord).
v18: (h) Interjection 'ἀμὴν ἀμὴν' (Amen, amen); (a) Cognate verb repetition 'ἐζώννυες' (you girded) and 'ζώσει' (will gird); (f) Contrast repetition 'ἤθελες' (you wished) and 'οὐ θέλεις' (you do not wish).
v19: (c) Demonstrative repetition 'τοῦτο' (this); (g) Divine name 'τὸν θεόν' (God); (f) Command refrain 'ἀκολούθει μοι' (follow me).
v20: (f) Refrain 'τὸν μαθητὴν ὃν ἠγάπα ὁ Ἰησοῦς' (the disciple whom Jesus loved); (g) Divine name 'κύριε' (Lord).
v21: (c) Demonstrative 'οὗτος' (this one); (g) Divine name 'κύριε' (Lord).
v22: (f) Repetition structure 'ἐὰν αὐτὸν θέλω μένειν ἕως ἔρχομαι, τί πρὸς σέ;' (If I will him to remain until I come, what to you?) and 'σύ μοι ἀκολούθει' (you follow me).
v23: (c) Demonstratives 'οὗτος ὁ λόγος' (this word) and 'ἐκεῖνος' (that [disciple]); (f) Phrase 'οὐκ ἀποθνῄσκει' (does not die) repeated three times, and verbatim repetition of Jesus' statement from verse 22.
v24: (c) Demonstrative grouping 'οὗτός' (this), 'τούτων' (these things), 'ταῦτα' (these things); (a) Cognate construction 'μαρτυρῶν' (witnessing) and 'μαρτυρία' (witness).
v25: (a) Cognate construction 'γράφηται' (should be written) and 'γραφόμενα' (being written); (h) Closing interjection 'ἀμήν' (Amen).

Passo 5Comparar as traduções, versículo por versículo

Cada diferença classificada: textual · lexical · gramatical · interpretativa · estilística (esta última apenas quando altera o sentido).

grammaticalv1 Translates the demonstrative pronoun as plural 'these things' versus singular 'this'. — “these things” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “did” (YLT) vs “this” (DRC)
lexicalv1 Different translations of the verb meaning to reveal, show, or manifest. — “shewed” (KJV, DRC) vs “manifested” (ASV, DARBY) vs “revealed” (WEB) vs “manifest” (YLT) vs “showed” (WEBSTER)
grammaticalv2 Different phrasing to describe origin ('of', 'from', or 'who was of/from'). — “of” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “who was” (DARBY, DRC) vs “from” (YLT)
grammaticalv2 Translates the genitive of location as 'in' versus 'of'. — “in” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “of” (YLT, DARBY, DRC)
stylisticv2 Modernized pluralization of 'other' versus 'others'. — “others” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “other” (KJV, ASV)
stylisticv3 (vv 3, 6, 10, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, 22) Different forms and tenses of the verb 'to say' and preposition 'to'. — “to” (YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “saith unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “said to” (WEB) vs “says to” (DARBY)
stylisticv3 Archaic versus modern expression for going fishing. — “I go a fishing” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “I’m going” (WEB) vs “away to fish” (YLT) vs “to fish” (DARBY)
stylisticv3 Different forms of the verb 'to say' or 'to tell' and preposition 'to'. — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “say unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “told” (WEB)
lexicalv3 Translates the verb of motion as 'come' or 'go'. — “come” (ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “also go” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “are coming” (WEB) vs “we also” (YLT)
stylisticv3 Archaic versus modern second-person pronoun and inclusion of conjunction. — “thee” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB) vs “And” (DRC)
stylisticv3 Translates the directional adverb as 'forth' versus 'out'. — “forth” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “out” (WEB)
lexicalv3 Translates the verb for catching fish as 'caught' or 'took'. — “they caught” (WEB, KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “took” (ASV, DARBY)
stylisticv4 Archaic versus modern phrasing of a negative verb. — “knew not” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “didn’t know” (WEB) vs “did know” (YLT) vs “however did know” (DARBY)
grammaticalv5 Different handling and placement of the conjunction 'therefore' and the verb of speaking. — “therefore said to” (WEB, DRC) vs “saith unto” (KJV) vs “therefore” (ASV) vs “therefore to” (YLT) vs “therefore says to” (DARBY) vs “to” (WEBSTER)
lexicalv6 Translates the directional preposition as 'on' versus 'at'. — “on” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “at” (YLT, DARBY)
lexicalv6 Translates the vessel as 'boat' versus 'ship'. — “boat” (WEB, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “ship” (KJV, DARBY, DRC)
stylisticv6 Archaic versus modern second-person pronouns and auxiliary verbs. — “ye shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “you will” (WEB) vs “will” (DARBY) vs “you” (DRC)
lexicalv6 Translates the preposition indicating cause as 'for', 'from', or 'in'. — “for” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “from” (YLT, DARBY) vs “in” (WEB)
stylisticv6 Pluralized form 'fishes' versus collective 'fish'. — “fishes” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “fish” (WEB) vs “the” (YLT)
stylisticv7 Different tenses and forms of the verb 'to say' alongside the preposition. — “said to” (WEB, DRC) vs “loved saith unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “was loving to” (YLT) vs “says to” (DARBY) vs “to” (WEBSTER)
lexicalv8 Translates the conjunction as 'And' versus 'But'. — “And” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “But” (WEB, ASV, DRC)
lexicalv8 Translates the vessel as a generic 'boat' or specifically a 'little ship' / 'small boat', with varying prepositions. — “the boat” (WEB, ASV) vs “in a little ship” (KJV) vs “by the boat” (YLT) vs “the small boat” (DARBY) vs “boat” (WEBSTER) vs “the” (DRC)
stylisticv8 Different expressions denoting approximation ('about' versus 'as it were'). — “about” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “as it were” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “somewhere about” (DARBY)
grammaticalv8 Different prepositional phrasing to describe the net containing fish. — “with fishes” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “full of fish” (WEB) vs “full of” (ASV) vs “of the” (YLT) vs “of” (DARBY)
grammaticalv9 Different English conjunctions and phrasing for the temporal clause. — “As soon then as” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “So when” (WEB, ASV) vs “when therefore” (YLT, DARBY)
lexicalv9 Translates the verb of disembarking as 'got out', 'came', or 'went out'. — “got out on the” (WEB) vs “were come to” (KJV) vs “got out upon the” (ASV) vs “came the” (YLT) vs “went out on the” (DARBY) vs “had” (WEBSTER) vs “came” (DRC)
lexicalv9 Different tenses and words for seeing or beholding. — “saw a fire of” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER) vs “see” (ASV, DARBY) vs “behold” (YLT) vs “hot” (DRC)
grammaticalv9 Different phrasing for the participle indicating the fish were placed on the fire. — “there and” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “lying a” (YLT, DRC) vs “with” (WEB)
grammaticalv10 Different ways of expressing the partitive idea ('some' versus 'of'/'from'). — “of” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “some” (WEB) vs “ye from” (YLT) vs “hither” (DRC)
lexicalv11 Translates the preposition denoting direction to the land. — “to” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “up on the” (YLT) vs “the” (DARBY)
stylisticv11 Differences in expressing the number 'one hundred' and phrasing of the nouns. — “a” (ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “one” (WEB, DRC) vs “great fishes an” (KJV, YLT)
lexicalv11 Translates the verb describing the net tearing as 'rent', 'torn', or 'broken'. — “was not rent” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “was not” (WEBSTER, DRC) vs “wasn’t torn” (WEB) vs “broken” (KJV)
lexicalv12 Translates the verb for eating the morning meal as 'dine', 'eat breakfast', or 'break your fast'. — “and dine And” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “eat breakfast” (WEB) vs “break your fast” (ASV) vs “ye” (YLT) vs “But” (DARBY)
stylisticv12 Archaic versus modern phrasing of 'are you'. — “art thou” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “are you” (WEB)
stylisticv13 Different tenses (past versus historical present) of the verb 'to take'. — “taketh” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “took the” (WEB) vs “the” (ASV) vs “take the” (YLT) vs “takes the” (DARBY)
stylisticv13 Different tenses (past versus historical present) of the verb 'to give'. — “and giveth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “gave it to” (WEB) vs “give to” (YLT) vs “gives it to” (DARBY)
stylisticv13 Translates the adverb as 'likewise' versus 'in like manner'. — “likewise” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “in like manner” (YLT, DARBY, DRC)
lexicalv14 Translates the adverb as 'now' or 'already'. — “now the” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “a” (YLT) vs “already” (DARBY)
lexicalv14 Translates the verb meaning to reveal or manifest. — “was manifested” (ASV, YLT, DRC) vs “was revealed” (WEB) vs “shewed himself” (KJV) vs “had been manifested” (DARBY) vs “showed” (WEBSTER)
grammaticalv14 Translates the article either literally as 'the' or possessively as 'his'. — “his” (WEB, KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the” (ASV, DARBY)
textualv15 (vv 15, 16) Textual variant and translation choices for the name of Peter's father (Jonas/Jonah vs John). — “Jonas lovest thou” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “John” (ASV, DRC) vs “Jonah do you love” (WEB) vs “dost love” (YLT)
stylisticv15 (vv 15, 16) Archaic versus modern expression of affirmation. — “Yea” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “Yes” (WEB, YLT, WEBSTER)
stylisticv15 (vv 15, 16, 18) Archaic versus modern second-person pronoun and verb tense. — “thou knowest” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you know” (WEB) vs “hast known” (YLT)
lexicalv15 (vv 15, 16) Translates the specific Greek verb for love with different nuances. — “love thee” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “have affection for you” (WEB) vs “dearly” (YLT) vs “am attached to” (DARBY)
lexicalv16 Translates the verb for tending a flock as 'tend', 'feed', or 'shepherd'. — “Tend” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “Feed” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Shepherd” (DARBY)
textualv16 Textual variant reading 'sheep' versus 'lambs'. — “sheep” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “lambs” (DRC)
stylisticv17 Different verbs or phrasing to introduce the spoken question. — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “said unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “asked” (WEB) vs “had to” (DRC)
stylisticv17 Archaic versus modern preposition 'to'. — “to” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto” (KJV, ASV)
lexicalv18 Translates the dual affirmation as 'Verily, verily', 'Most certainly', or 'Amen, amen'. — “Verily verily” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Most certainly” (WEB) vs “Amen amen” (DRC)
stylisticv18 Different verbs for speaking and modernization of pronouns. — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “say unto thee” (KJV, ASV) vs “tell you” (WEB)
stylisticv18 Archaic versus modern auxiliary verb ('shalt' versus 'will'). — “thou shalt” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you will” (WEB)
stylisticv18 Archaic versus modern possessive pronoun and adverbial phrasing. — “forth thy” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “out your” (WEB)
stylisticv18 Archaic 'gird' versus modern 'dress' and modernization of pronouns. — “shall gird thee” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “will dress you” (WEB) vs “will” (YLT)
grammaticalv19 Different auxiliary verbs for the future or conditional sense ('should', 'would', or 'shall'). — “should” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “would” (WEB) vs “shall” (YLT)
grammaticalv20 Different phrasing for the relative clause describing the beloved disciple. — “who” (ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the one who had” (WEB) vs “loved following which” (KJV) vs “was loving who” (YLT)
lexicalv20 Translates the verb describing the posture at the supper. — “leaned” (WEB, KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “back” (ASV) vs “reclined in the supper” (YLT) vs “at supper” (DARBY)
stylisticv20 Different verbs of speaking and translation of the title 'Lord' or 'Sir'. — “who” (ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “asked who” (WEB) vs “said Lord which” (KJV) vs “Sir who” (YLT)
lexicalv20 Different tenses and vocabulary for the act of betrayal. — “he that betrayeth thee” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “going to betray you” (WEB) vs “who is delivering up” (YLT) vs “it delivers up” (DARBY) vs “shall betray” (DRC)
grammaticalv21 Different ways of supplying verbs or prepositions for the elliptical question 'and what of this man?' — “shall” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “of” (YLT, DARBY) vs “about” (WEB)
grammaticalv22 (vv 22, 23) Different handling of the conditional or resultative clause structure. — “If” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “him” (YLT) vs “So” (DRC)
stylisticv22 Archaic versus modern second-person pronoun and imperative phrasing. — “thee follow thou” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you You” (WEB) vs “be following” (YLT)
grammaticalv23 Different word order and phrasing for the negative verb 'did not say'. — “did say to” (YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “said not unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “didn’t say to” (WEB) vs “to” (WEBSTER)
grammaticalv23 Different auxiliary verbs mapping the future tense. — “shall not” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “should” (ASV, DRC) vs “wouldn’t” (WEB) vs “doth” (YLT) vs “does” (DARBY)
stylisticv23 Archaic versus modern second-person pronoun. — “thee” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you” (WEB)
grammaticalv24 Translates the definite article as 'the' versus the demonstrative 'that'. — “the” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “that” (DRC)
lexicalv24 Different verb forms and prepositional phrases for testifying or bearing witness. — “who testifies about” (WEB) vs “which testifieth of” (KJV) vs “that beareth witness” (ASV) vs “who is testifying concerning” (YLT) vs “who bears witness concerning” (DARBY) vs “who” (WEBSTER) vs “who giveth testimony” (DRC)
grammaticalv24 Different tenses (past versus perfect) of the verb 'to write' and repetition of the relative pronoun. — “wrote” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “he” (YLT) vs “who has written” (DARBY) vs “hath written” (DRC)
lexicalv24 Translates the noun as 'testimony' versus 'witness'. — “testimony” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “witness” (WEB, ASV, DARBY)
grammaticalv25 Different mood or auxiliary forms for expressing a hypothetical condition. — “should be” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “were” (DARBY, DRC) vs “would all” (WEB) vs “may” (YLT)

Passo 6Sintetizar — alegações atômicas, por família, não por número de assentos

Cada declaração é dividida nas menores alegações testáveis; cada perfil elegível é AFIRMA / NEGA / QUALIFICA / SILENCIA sobre cada uma.

O consenso

Across all families, it is universally affirmed that Jesus questions Simon Peter's love three times, deliberately mirroring and healing his earlier threefold denial, and commands him to feed His lambs and sheep. It is broadly maintained that Jesus prepares and shares a breakfast of bread and fish with the disciples on the shore, and that His rebuke regarding the Beloved Disciple's fate commands believers to focus on their own individual discipleship rather than comparing vocations or destinies with others. The ecclesiological implications of Peter's restoration are disputed, dividing those who assert that the command to feed the sheep establishes the supreme pastoral jurisdiction and primacy of the Petrine office from those who argue it establishes a pastoral mandate shared equally by all bishops and ministers. Another dispute surrounds the final verse, dividing those who contend the inexhaustible nature of Jesus' unwritten deeds demonstrates the necessity of the living Holy Tradition alongside Scripture from those who assert the text affirms the written biblical record is bounded and entirely sufficient for faith and practice. Finally, several traditions interpret the narrative's details symbolically, viewing the meal of bread and fish as possessing deep Eucharistic significance, the unbroken net as representing the indestructible unity and catholicity of the Church, and the 153 fish as typologically representing the totality of the elect.

Pancristão — APOIO em todas as famílias elegíveis

Jesus questions Simon Peter's love three times.
12 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 0 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre SUPPORT
quem disse o quê (12)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “The narrative culminates in a direct dialogue between Jesus and Simon Peter, where Jesus asks him three times about his love and commands him to feed His sheep.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “In a direct exchange, Jesus asks Simon Peter three times if he loves him, commanding him to 'feed my sheep' and predicting Peter's future martyrdom.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “In the subsequent dialogue, Jesus asks Peter three times if he loves Him, countering Peter's earlier threefold denial, and commissions him to 'feed my sheep.'”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “The threefold charge to Peter (vv. 15-17) is deeply embedded in the Book of Common Prayer's Ordinal, particularly in the ordering of Priests and consecration of Bishops, where it anchors the Anglican understanding of ordained ministry as a pastoral, self-sacrificial feeding of Christ's flock.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
  “The narrative describes a miraculous catch of fish, a breakfast prepared by Jesus on the shore, a poignant dialogue in which Jesus questions Peter's love three times and commands him to feed his sheep, a prediction of Peter's martyrdom, and a clarifying exchange regarding the future of the Beloved Disciple, concluding with a testimony to the Gospel's truth and the inexhaustibility of Christ's deeds.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “Jesus then deliberately restores Peter, whose threefold denial is reversed by a threefold profession of love, accompanied by the command to feed Christ's sheep.”
- Baptist · AFFIRM
  “The narrative details a miraculous catch of fish, a breakfast prepared by Jesus, and a focused dialogue with Simon Peter where Jesus asks three times about Peter's love and commissions him to feed the flock.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
  “Jesus then leads Simon Peter through a threefold profession of love, corresponding to Peter's earlier threefold denial, and commissions him to care for the flock ('Feed my sheep').”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “Following the meal, Jesus engages in a pointed, restorative dialogue with Peter, asking him three times about his love and commissioning him to 'Feed my sheep' and 'Tend my lambs.'”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
  “Jesus then formally restores Peter through a threefold questioning of his love, directly countering Peter's threefold denial, and commissions him to feed his sheep.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “During a shoreline breakfast, Jesus restores Peter, asking him three times about his love, counteracting Peter's previous threefold denial.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
  “Jesus questions Peter's love three times, corresponding to his prior denials, and commissions him to feed and tend his sheep, prophesying Peter's future martyrdom.”
Jesus commands Peter to feed His lambs and sheep.
12 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 0 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre SUPPORT
quem disse o quê (12)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “For the Catholic communion, Jesus' commands to feed His lambs and sheep (vv. 15-17) form the scriptural foundation for the primacy of the Pope.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “In a direct exchange, Jesus asks Simon Peter three times if he loves him, commanding him to 'feed my sheep' and predicting Peter's future martyrdom.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “In the subsequent dialogue, Jesus asks Peter three times if he loves Him, countering Peter's earlier threefold denial, and commissions him to 'feed my sheep.'”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “It features a miraculous catch of fish by seven disciples, a breakfast prepared by Jesus on the shore, the threefold restoration and pastoral commissioning of Peter ('Feed my sheep'), a prediction of Peter's martyrdom, and a clarification regarding the destiny of the Beloved Disciple.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
  “The narrative describes a miraculous catch of fish, a breakfast prepared by Jesus on the shore, a poignant dialogue in which Jesus questions Peter's love three times and commands him to feed his sheep, a prediction of Peter's martyrdom, and a clarifying exchange regarding the future of the Beloved Disciple, concluding with a testimony to the Gospel's truth and the inexhaustibility of Christ's deeds.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “Jesus then deliberately restores Peter, whose threefold denial is reversed by a threefold profession of love, accompanied by the command to feed Christ's sheep.”
- Baptist · AFFIRM
  “The command to 'Feed my sheep' refers to the pastoral duty to nourish the local church with the Word and ordinances, rather than establishing universal papal primacy.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
  “Wesley distinguishes the pastoral commands: 'Feed my lambs' (v. 15) refers to the weak and young in faith, while 'Feed my sheep' (vv. 16-17) refers to adult, strong believers.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “Following the meal, Jesus engages in a pointed, restorative dialogue with Peter, asking him three times about his love and commissioning him to 'Feed my sheep' and 'Tend my lambs.'”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
  “Jesus then formally restores Peter through a threefold questioning of his love, directly countering Peter's threefold denial, and commissions him to feed his sheep.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “Christ then commands Peter to tend His flock, predicts Peter's future martyrdom, and rebukes Peter's curiosity about John's fate by emphasizing personal discipleship and pointing toward His future coming.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
  “Jesus questions Peter's love three times, corresponding to his prior denials, and commissions him to feed and tend his sheep, prophesying Peter's future martyrdom.”
Jesus' threefold questioning of Peter deliberately mirrors and heals his earlier threefold denial.
12 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 0 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre SUPPORT
quem disse o quê (12)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “Both Latin and Eastern Fathers recognize Jesus' threefold questioning of Peter (vv. 15-17) as a deliberate, medicinal reversal of his threefold denial during the Passion.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Read in the context of patristic consensus, the threefold confession of love is understood as the medicinal healing of Peter's threefold denial during the Passion.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Cyril and later fathers like Severus of Antioch emphasize that Christ did not merely forgive Peter; He required a threefold confession of love to specifically and surgically heal the wounds of his threefold denial.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “Across the tradition's comprehensiveness, interpretations flourish: Evangelicals focus on the grace of Peter’s personal restoration following his earlier denials;”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
  “Theologically, the passage is read through the law-gospel distinction: Peter's threefold denial under the terror of the Law is met with Christ's threefold question and mandate, delivering the Gospel of complete restoration.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “The threefold questioning corresponds symmetrically to the threefold denial, acting as a public rehabilitation.”
- Baptist · AFFIRM
  “Reading canonically, the tradition connects Jesus' three-fold questioning of Peter (vv. 15-17) to Peter's three-fold denial recorded earlier in John 18, viewing this as a deliberate act of grace and pastoral restoration.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
  “Jesus then leads Simon Peter through a threefold profession of love, corresponding to Peter's earlier threefold denial, and commissions him to care for the flock ('Feed my sheep').”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “Jesus' threefold restoration of Peter, who had denied him three times, is viewed as a definitive model for restorative justice and reconciliation within the congregation.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
  “Jesus then formally restores Peter through a threefold questioning of his love, directly countering Peter's threefold denial, and commissions him to feed his sheep.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “Peter's threefold questioning was deliberately designed by Christ to parallel his threefold denial, testing his transformation from self-confidence to humble dependence.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
  “Jesus questions Peter's love three times, corresponding to his prior denials, and commissions him to feed and tend his sheep, prophesying Peter's future martyrdom.”
Peter's restoration demonstrates that past failures do not permanently disqualify a believer from pastoral ministry.
9 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 2 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre SUPPORT
quem disse o quê (10)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “Pastorally, the chapter provides a paradigm for the Sacrament of Penance, showing that Christ restores the fallen believer not with condemnation, but by eliciting love and renewing their mission.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Ascetically and pastorally, Peter's grief and subsequent restoration serve as the ultimate paradigm for the mystery of repentance (metanoia) and the sacrament of confession, demonstrating that no fall is beyond the restorative grace of Christ.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Priests and believers are taught that no denial or sin is beyond repair if met with a sincere, threefold confession of love.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “Pastorally, Peter's restoration is utilized in the reconciliation of penitents, illustrating that human failure does not negate one's calling or Christ's grace.”
- Lutheran · QUALIFY
  “Pastorally, the chapter is invoked to comfort those burdened by grave sin; it stands as a prime example of Christ seeking out the fallen to speak a word of absolution and restoration.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “Where the latter interpreted this passage as establishing papal primacy and universal jurisdiction, John Calvin and subsequent Reformed divines argued that Christ was simply restoring Peter to the apostolic office he had jeopardized through his threefold denial.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “The chapter is frequently utilized in ordination and commissioning services, reminding leaders that pastoral authority is rooted in sacrificial love and a willingness to follow the suffering Christ, rather than in institutional power.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
  “Pastors frequently use verses 15-17 in altar calls focused on restoration, inviting those who have backslidden or failed in ministry to hear Jesus asking 'Do you love me?' and to receive fresh commissioning.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “Furthermore, Christ's gentle approach to the erring Peter is upheld as the definitive model for church discipline and reconciliation; leaders are taught to restore the fallen with tender, probing questions rather than harsh condemnation.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
  “Additionally, the chapter is used pastorally to assure believers that failure (like Peter's) can be met with restoration and renewed usefulness in the local church, provided there is a return to loving obedience.”

Amplo — APOIO em todas as famílias, exceto uma, sendo esta indeterminada

Jesus prepares and shares a breakfast of bread and fish with the disciples on the shore.
8 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 3 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (9)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “Upon recognizing the Lord, Peter swims to shore, where Jesus has prepared a breakfast of bread and fish over a charcoal fire.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Jesus provides a meal of bread and fish cooked over charcoal.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Jesus then shares a breakfast of bread and fish with them, prepared over a charcoal fire.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “It features a miraculous catch of fish by seven disciples, a breakfast prepared by Jesus on the shore, the threefold restoration and pastoral commissioning of Peter ('Feed my sheep'), a prediction of Peter's martyrdom, and a clarification regarding the destiny of the Beloved Disciple.”
- Lutheran · QUALIFY
  “The narrative describes a miraculous catch of fish, a breakfast prepared by Jesus on the shore, a poignant dialogue in which Jesus questions Peter's love three times and commands him to feed his sheep, a prediction of Peter's martyrdom, and a clarifying exchange regarding the future of the Beloved Disciple, concluding with a testimony to the Gospel's truth and the inexhaustibility of Christ's deeds.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “He directs a miraculous catch of 153 fish, prepares a breakfast of bread and fish for them, and proves the physical reality of his resurrected body.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
  “Recognizing the Lord, they share a meal of fish and bread on the shore.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “Jesus directs a miraculous catch of 153 fish and hosts a lakeside breakfast of bread and fish for them.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
  “Recognizing him, Peter swims ashore to find Jesus has prepared a breakfast of fish and bread.”
Jesus' rebuke regarding the Beloved Disciple's fate commands believers to focus on their own individual discipleship rather than comparing vocations or destinies with others.
9 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 3 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre SUPPORT
quem disse o quê (9)
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “The differing trajectories of Peter and the Beloved Disciple (vv. 20-22) are frequently invoked in spiritual direction to emphasize that God calls individuals to diverse vocations—some to active leadership or suffering, others to contemplative witness—and that believers are commanded to 'follow me' rather than compare their paths with others.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
  “When Jesus tells Peter, 'What is that to thee? Follow thou me,' Luther reads a divine directive against comparing crosses; each believer is given a distinct calling and a specific cross to bear in following Christ.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “Additionally, believers are counseled from Jesus' words to Peter in verse 22 to practice contentment with their own providential lot, focusing on their personal obedience ('follow thou me') rather than comparing their trials or blessings with those of other Christians.”
- Baptist · AFFIRM
  “For the individual believer, Jesus' rebuke in verse 22 ('what is that to thee? follow thou me') is frequently preached as a mandate for individual discipleship and personal accountability, urging believers to pursue their own obedience to Christ without undue comparison to the callings, blessings, or trials of others.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
  “It warns believers against spiritual comparison and distraction, insisting that the primary duty of every Christian is to pursue holiness and follow Christ's distinct calling for their own lives.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “When Peter inquires about the fate of the Beloved Disciple, Jesus redirects him to his own personal mandate of discipleship.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
  “Jesus predicts Peter's eventual martyrdom and addresses Peter's distraction regarding the Beloved Disciple by emphasizing individual calling.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “Furthermore, Christ's response concerning John (John 21:22-23) is understood as a vital reorientation from human comparison toward the literal Second Advent, a central pillar of Adventist eschatology, emphasizing that the believer's primary duty is to 'follow' Jesus regardless of the varied destinies of others.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
  “John 21:22 ('what is that to thee? follow thou me') is a characteristic text in Restorationist thought for emphasizing individual obedience to Christ's commands regardless of the actions, traditions, or destinies of others.”

Específico de família — característico de uma família

True pastoral authority relies on spiritual care and love rather than coercive institutional or state power.
3 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (3)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
  “Verses 15-17 are frequently read at the ordination and installation of pastors, reminding them that their sole authority and duty is to feed Christ's flock with the pure Gospel, motivated by love for the Lord.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “The command to 'feed my sheep' requires ministers to faithfully nourish the church with the Word of God, not to assert earthly dominion.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “For Menno and early Anabaptists, authentic shepherds are motivated by a supreme love for Christ and employ spiritual care rather than the coercive power or worldly status claimed by state-church clergy.”
The distinction between feeding 'lambs' and 'sheep' differentiates pastoral care for the young or weak in faith from that for mature believers.
2 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 10 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (2)
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
  “Wesley distinguishes the pastoral commands: 'Feed my lambs' (v. 15) refers to the weak and young in faith, while 'Feed my sheep' (vv. 16-17) refers to adult, strong believers.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “Christ's specific injunction to 'Feed my lambs' (John 21:15) is frequently utilized to underscore the church's sacred duty toward children, youth, and newly baptized converts, demanding that ministers prioritize their spiritual education and protection.”
The meal of bread and fish possesses deep Eucharistic significance.
4 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 8 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (4)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “Liturgically, the bread and fish laid on the coals by Jesus (vv. 9, 13) are read with deep Eucharistic resonance, echoing the earliest Christian iconography found in the Roman catacombs where fish and bread signify the Eucharist.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “The meal of fish and bread prepared on coals (verses 9-13) is received as a demonstration of the physical reality of the bodily resurrection and as a profound Eucharistic symbol, prefiguring the eschatological banquet.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Furthermore, the mysterious meal of bread and fish prepared on the charcoal fire is revered as an icon of the Eucharist, reminding the faithful that it is the risen Christ Himself who continually feeds His Church.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “Anglo-Catholics, such as William Temple, highlight the profound Eucharistic resonance of the meal of bread and fish (vv. 9-13) and the intimate link between love for Christ and the pastoral office;”
The physical eating of the meal demonstrates the bodily reality of Christ's resurrection.
3 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (3)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “The meal of fish and bread prepared on coals (verses 9-13) is received as a demonstration of the physical reality of the bodily resurrection and as a profound Eucharistic symbol, prefiguring the eschatological banquet.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Liturgically, this chapter is highly prominent during the Paschal season (the Holy Fifty Days in the Coptic and Ethiopian rites), read to assure the faithful of the physical reality of Christ’s resurrected presence and to emphasize the ongoing apostolic mandate.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “He directs a miraculous catch of 153 fish, prepares a breakfast of bread and fish for them, and proves the physical reality of his resurrected body.”
The unbroken net symbolizes the indestructible unity and catholicity of the Church.
3 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 8 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (4)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “Augustine famously contrasts this catch with the one in Luke 5: there the nets tear, representing the Church in history mixed with good and bad; here, the net is unbroken (v. 11), symbolizing the perfect unity of the eschatological Church.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “The unbroken net holding one hundred fifty-three fish (verse 11) is commonly understood by Greek Fathers, such as Cyril of Alexandria, to symbolize the unity and catholicity of the Church, which gathers the fullness of the nations without being torn by schism.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “The net that does not break, despite the immense catch, is a vital image demonstrating the indestructible, dogmatic unity of the one Church.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · QUALIFY
  “while Broad Church readers often view the unbroken net of 153 fish (v. 11) as signifying the Church's inclusive, global mission and its capacity to hold diversity in unity.”
The 153 fish typologically represent the totality of the elect gathered into the Church.
2 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (3)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “Augustine mathematically allegorizes the 153 fish as the sum of integers from 1 to 17 (10 for the Decalogue, 7 for the Holy Spirit), representing the totality of the elect.”
- Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
  “The unbroken net holding one hundred fifty-three fish (verse 11) is commonly understood by Greek Fathers, such as Cyril of Alexandria, to symbolize the unity and catholicity of the Church, which gathers the fullness of the nations without being torn by schism.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Cyril interprets the 153 fish numerologically: 100 represents the fullness of the Gentile converts (the perfect number indicating totality), 50 signifies the remnant of Israel saved by grace, and the number 3 points to the Holy Trinity, to whose glory the entire Church is gathered.”
The disciples' success after a night of failure demonstrates that evangelistic mission is fruitless without the present direction of Christ.
3 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (3)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “The fruitless night of fishing represents the time before the Resurrection—or the labor of the prophets under the Law—which yielded little without Christ.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
  “Furthermore, the miraculous catch is frequently interpreted as a model for evangelistic mission: human effort without divine direction yields nothing, but obedience to the present, speaking Jesus brings a miraculous harvest.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “The miraculous catch (John 21:3-6) is interpreted as a lesson that human effort, no matter how experienced, is useless in the gospel enterprise without Christ's explicit direction.”

Específico de tradição — apenas uma tradição

The shift in the Greek words for love used by Jesus and Peter highlights Peter's newfound humility and loss of self-reliance.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (1)
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
  “Adam Clarke's 'Commentary on the Bible' famously highlights the transition in the Greek terms for love (agapao and phileo) in verses 15-17, observing that Peter, stripped of his former self-reliance, humbly responds with a word signifying deep affectionate friendship rather than claiming a superior, self-generated devotion.”
Peter's restoration represents a necessary stage of preparatory grace before the subsequent infilling of the Holy Spirit.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (1)
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
  “In the broader Holiness tradition, Peter's restoration here is viewed as the crucial intermediate step between his failure at the crucifixion and his subsequent sanctification, demonstrating prevenient and restoring grace preparing the heart for the fullness of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost.”
The night of fruitless fishing signifies the era of the Law before the Resurrection, while the morning catch represents the post-Resurrection apostolic mission.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (1)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “The fruitless night of fishing represents the time before the Resurrection—or the labor of the prophets under the Law—which yielded little without Christ. The dawn and the command to cast the net on the 'right side' signify the post-Resurrection era, where the apostolic preaching gathers the righteous into the Kingdom.”
Jesus' statement 'till I come' is designed to redirect believers' focus toward preparation for the literal Second Advent.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “Jesus' statement 'till I come' points directly to the Second Advent, redirecting the believer's focus from idle curiosity to personal preparation and discipleship.”
Jesus' prediction of Peter being led where he does not wish to go establishes a paradigm for the suffering, nonresistant church.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (1)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “Thieleman J. van Braght's 'Martyrs Mirror' extensively invokes Jesus' prediction of Peter being led where he does not wish to go (John 21:18-19) to frame Peter as a prototypical martyr, connecting the apostles' suffering to the persecution of nonresistant Anabaptists.”
The declaration of Jesus' inexhaustible deeds implies that His miraculous works are continually ongoing in the present through the Holy Spirit.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (1)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
  “Pentecostal scholars have argued that the inexhaustible acts of Jesus described here set the trajectory for His continuing miraculous works through the Holy Spirit in the early church and the modern era.”
The chapter provides the texts for the Tenth and Eleventh Eothina readings at Sunday Matins.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (1)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “It provides the texts for two of the eleven Resurrectional Matins Gospels (the Eothina): John 21:1-14 is read as the Tenth Eothinon, and John 21:15-25 is read as the Eleventh Eothinon, anchoring the Sunday morning celebration of the Resurrection.”

Mencionado entre as famílias — afirmado em alguma parte de cada família, sem maioria — não é consenso

A proven, intense love for Christ is the fundamental prerequisite for holding pastoral authority.
6 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 6 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (6)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “Furthermore, it models the exercise of authority in the Church: papal and episcopal power are fundamentally defined as pastoral service, feeding the flock out of love for Christ, which reminds the hierarchy that the sheep belong to Jesus, not to the shepherds.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “This establishes that pastoral authority in the Church is fundamentally predicated on a tested, intense love for the Lord, and it confirms the complete restoration of fallen humanity through repentance.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “Anglo-Catholics, such as William Temple, highlight the profound Eucharistic resonance of the meal of bread and fish (vv. 9-13) and the intimate link between love for Christ and the pastoral office;”
- Baptist · AFFIRM
  “In Baptist pastoral theology, verses 15-17 are regularly applied to ministers, emphasizing that the primary qualification for undershepherds is a deep, personal love for Christ, and their primary duty is preaching the Word to the local congregation.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “For Menno and early Anabaptists, authentic shepherds are motivated by a supreme love for Christ and employ spiritual care rather than the coercive power or worldly status claimed by state-church clergy.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
  “His threefold commissioning grounds all future charismatic ministry in a primary, foundational love for Christ rather than mere spiritual gifting.”

Em disputa — uma família é mista, ou famílias afirmam vs. negam

Jesus directs the disciples to a miraculous catch of fish after a night of fruitless fishing.
8 afirmam · 0 negam · 2 qualificam · 2 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre SUPPORT
quem disse o quê (10)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “It features a miraculous catch of 153 fish by seven disciples acting under the direction of the unrecognized risen Christ.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “After a night of fruitless fishing, Jesus directs them to a miraculous catch, leading the beloved disciple to recognize him.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Set at the Sea of Tiberias, it recounts a night of unsuccessful fishing that is reversed at dawn by Jesus' command to cast the net on the right side of the boat, resulting in a massive catch of 153 fish.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “It features a miraculous catch of fish by seven disciples, a breakfast prepared by Jesus on the shore, the threefold restoration and pastoral commissioning of Peter ('Feed my sheep'), a prediction of Peter's martyrdom, and a clarification regarding the destiny of the Beloved Disciple.”
- Lutheran · QUALIFY
  “The narrative describes a miraculous catch of fish, a breakfast prepared by Jesus on the shore, a poignant dialogue in which Jesus questions Peter's love three times and commands him to feed his sheep, a prediction of Peter's martyrdom, and a clarifying exchange regarding the future of the Beloved Disciple, concluding with a testimony to the Gospel's truth and the inexhaustibility of Christ's deeds.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · QUALIFY
  “He directs a miraculous catch of 153 fish, prepares a breakfast of bread and fish for them, and proves the physical reality of his resurrected body.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
  “After the disciples fish all night and catch nothing, the unrecognized Jesus directs them to a miraculous catch.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “Jesus directs a miraculous catch of 153 fish and hosts a lakeside breakfast of bread and fish for them.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
  “Seven disciples, having caught nothing after a night of fishing, are directed by the unrecognized Jesus to cast their net on the right side, resulting in a massive catch.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “After a night of fruitless fishing, Jesus directs them to a miraculous catch, echoing their initial calling.”
Jesus' command to feed His sheep establishes the supreme pastoral jurisdiction and primacy of the Petrine office.
1 afirmam · 7 negam · 0 qualificam · 4 silenciamAntiga MIXEDReforma OPPOSEIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
quem disse o quê (8)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “The First Vatican Council explicitly cites these verses to define that Christ conferred upon Peter the jurisdiction of supreme shepherd over the whole flock.”
- Eastern Orthodox · DENY
  “The command to 'feed my sheep' is received not as the conferral of exclusive, universal supremacy over the rest of the apostles (as in Roman Catholic papal claims), but as Peter's restoration to the apostolic college.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
  “Historically, English Reformers such as John Jewel engaged these verses to counter Roman Catholic claims of exclusive Petrine supremacy; they argued that Christ’s command to 'feed my sheep' was a universal apostolic commission shared by all faithful bishops and presbyters.”
- Lutheran · DENY
  “Melanchthon argues that 'feeding' simply means preaching the Gospel and ruling the church by the Word, a mandate given equally to all pastors, thereby denying that this text confers any unique temporal or spiritual monarchy upon Peter.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
  “Where the latter interpreted this passage as establishing papal primacy and universal jurisdiction, John Calvin and subsequent Reformed divines argued that Christ was simply restoring Peter to the apostolic office he had jeopardized through his threefold denial.”
- Baptist · DENY
  “Baptists strongly reject hierarchical interpretations of verses 15-17 that claim Peter was granted supreme jurisdictional authority over the universal church.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · DENY
  “For Menno and early Anabaptists, authentic shepherds are motivated by a supreme love for Christ and employ spiritual care rather than the coercive power or worldly status claimed by state-church clergy.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
  “The command to 'feed my sheep' (John 21:15-17) is also canonically linked to the ongoing role of local elders (pastors) in overseeing the congregation, distinguishing the permanent work of local shepherding from the temporary apostolic office.”
The command to feed the sheep establishes a pastoral mandate shared equally by all bishops and ministers.
4 afirmam · 1 negam · 1 qualificam · 6 silenciamAntiga MIXEDReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
quem disse o quê (6)
- Catholic · DENY
  “The First Vatican Council explicitly cites these verses to define that Christ conferred upon Peter the jurisdiction of supreme shepherd over the whole flock.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Cyril of Alexandria and John Chrysostom both emphasize that this pastoral commission to shepherd the flock is shared equally by all the apostles and their successors, the bishops.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “Historically, English Reformers such as John Jewel engaged these verses to counter Roman Catholic claims of exclusive Petrine supremacy; they argued that Christ’s command to 'feed my sheep' was a universal apostolic commission shared by all faithful bishops and presbyters.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
  “Melanchthon argues that 'feeding' simply means preaching the Gospel and ruling the church by the Word, a mandate given equally to all pastors, thereby denying that this text confers any unique temporal or spiritual monarchy upon Peter.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “For the Reformed, the command to 'feed' is the fundamental mandate for all Christian pastors: to nourish the flock with the preached Word of God, rather than to exercise lordly dominion.”
- Baptist · QUALIFY
  “Instead, expositors like John Gill read 'Feed my sheep' as establishing the model for local congregational ministry, where all true pastors are called to nourish the flock with the preached Word and the ordinances.”
The command to feed the sheep defines pastoral ministry primarily as preaching the Word and administering the sacraments.
0 afirmam · 0 negam · 3 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
quem disse o quê (3)
- Lutheran · QUALIFY
  “Melanchthon argues that 'feeding' simply means preaching the Gospel and ruling the church by the Word, a mandate given equally to all pastors, thereby denying that this text confers any unique temporal or spiritual monarchy upon Peter.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · QUALIFY
  “For the Reformed, the command to 'feed' is the fundamental mandate for all Christian pastors: to nourish the flock with the preached Word of God, rather than to exercise lordly dominion.”
- Baptist · QUALIFY
  “Instead, expositors like John Gill read 'Feed my sheep' as establishing the model for local congregational ministry, where all true pastors are called to nourish the flock with the preached Word and the ordinances.”
The threefold questioning publicly restores Peter to the apostolic office he had jeopardized.
6 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 5 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
quem disse o quê (7)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
  “Cyril of Alexandria and Augustine both teach that Peter's apostolic mandate is healed and restored through this repeated profession of love.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “The command to 'feed my sheep' is received not as the conferral of exclusive, universal supremacy over the rest of the apostles (as in Roman Catholic papal claims), but as Peter's restoration to the apostolic college.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “Peter's threefold confession of love is the definitive paradigm for the efficacy of repentance, demonstrating that the fallen can be completely restored to grace and ministry.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “It features a miraculous catch of fish by seven disciples, a breakfast prepared by Jesus on the shore, the threefold restoration and pastoral commissioning of Peter ('Feed my sheep'), a prediction of Peter's martyrdom, and a clarification regarding the destiny of the Beloved Disciple.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
  “Theologically, the passage is read through the law-gospel distinction: Peter's threefold denial under the terror of the Law is met with Christ's threefold question and mandate, delivering the Gospel of complete restoration.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “The threefold questioning of Peter's love corresponded to his threefold denial, serving to publicly restore him to the apostolic office rather than conferring unique primacy.”
- Baptist · QUALIFY
  “Reading canonically, the tradition connects Jesus' three-fold questioning of Peter (vv. 15-17) to Peter's three-fold denial recorded earlier in John 18, viewing this as a deliberate act of grace and pastoral restoration.”
The interaction between Jesus and Peter provides a model for restorative congregational discipline rather than punitive condemnation.
3 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 8 silenciamAntiga LEANING-CONTESTEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (4)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
  “Pastorally, the chapter provides a paradigm for the Sacrament of Penance, showing that Christ restores the fallen believer not with condemnation, but by eliciting love and renewing their mission.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
  “Pastorally, Peter's restoration is utilized in the reconciliation of penitents, illustrating that human failure does not negate one's calling or Christ's grace.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “Rather than viewing discipline merely as punitive exclusion, the goal is the loving restoration of the erring member; contemporary commentators like Willard Swartley note that Jesus addresses failure with an invitation to renewed communal responsibility (John 21:15-17).”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “Furthermore, Christ's gentle approach to the erring Peter is upheld as the definitive model for church discipline and reconciliation; leaders are taught to restore the fallen with tender, probing questions rather than harsh condemnation.”
The command 'follow me' requires immediate obedience to the gospel, disregarding the actions or differing traditions of others.
3 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 8 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINED
quem disse o quê (4)
- Lutheran · QUALIFY
  “Believers are also taught to apply Christ's words 'Follow me' to their daily lives, embracing their unique vocational stations without coveting the seemingly easier paths or different spiritual gifts granted to others.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
  “The repeated command 'Follow me' (John 21:19, 22) is read as the defining characteristic of the Christian life, requiring personal obedience regardless of circumstances or the paths of others.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
  “The concluding command to 'Follow me' (John 21:22) is preached as a call to unconditional, individual obedience in the face of the imminent advent, warning believers against being distracted by the spiritual paths or perceived shortcomings of their peers.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
  “Application in Churches of Christ frequently centers on Jesus' rebuke in verse 22, urging individuals during evangelistic appeals and sermons not to delay their own obedience (such as baptism) out of concern for unbaptized relatives or the differing practices of other denominations.”
The assertion that the world could not contain the books of Jesus' deeds affirms that the written biblical record is bounded and entirely sufficient for faith and practice.
3 afirmam · 2 negam · 0 qualificam · 7 silenciamAntiga LEANING-CONTESTEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre MIXED
quem disse o quê (5)
- Eastern Orthodox · DENY
  “It signifies that the mystery of the incarnate Word and His divine acts cannot be exhaustively comprehended by human intellect or confined to written text, thus necessitating the living Holy Tradition of the Church.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
  “Finally, verse 25—the assertion that the world could not contain the books if all Jesus did were written—is received as an affirmation of the sufficiency of Scripture.”
- Baptist · AFFIRM
  “Furthermore, the concluding verses (vv. 24-25) are received as an affirmation of biblical authority and sufficiency; while Christ's deeds were inexhaustible, the written testimony is entirely sufficient to establish true faith and practice.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · DENY
  “John 21:25 indicates that the works of Jesus are meant to be seen as ongoing and inexhaustible, supporting a continuationist theology against cessationism.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
  “B.W. Johnson, in 'The People's New Testament', argues that the Gospels are not exhaustive biographies but select testimonies containing everything necessary to produce faith and govern the church.”
The inexhaustible nature of Jesus' unwritten deeds demonstrates the necessity of the living Holy Tradition alongside written Scripture.
1 afirmam · 3 negam · 0 qualificam · 8 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTED
quem disse o quê (4)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
  “It signifies that the mystery of the incarnate Word and His divine acts cannot be exhaustively comprehended by human intellect or confined to written text, thus necessitating the living Holy Tradition of the Church.”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
  “Calvin argued that God accommodated His revelation to human capacity, purposefully omitting exhaustive details so that believers would have exactly what is sufficient and necessary for faith, avoiding both overwhelming volume and reliance on unwritten tradition.”
- Baptist · DENY
  “Furthermore, the concluding verses (vv. 24-25) are received as an affirmation of biblical authority and sufficiency; while Christ's deeds were inexhaustible, the written testimony is entirely sufficient to establish true faith and practice.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
  “Therefore, the tradition rejects speculative theology based on what Christ might have done, insisting on speaking only where the written text speaks.”

Passo 7Renderizar a New Consensus Bible

A partir do texto no idioma original. As tradições documentam a recepção; elas não votam na formulação. Toda formulação contestada que a tradução resolveu está listada abaixo, não oculta.

¹After these things, Jesus revealed himself again to the disciples by the Sea of Tiberias; and he revealed himself in this way: ²Gathered together were Simon Peter, and Thomas the one called Didymus, and Nathanael the one from Cana of Galilee, and the ones of Zebedee, and two others of his disciples. ³Simon Peter says to them, "I am going fishing." They say to him, "We also are coming with you." They went out and immediately entered into the boat, and in that night they caught nothing. ⁴But when morning had already come, Jesus stood on the shore; yet the disciples did not know that it was Jesus. ⁵Therefore Jesus says to them, "Children, you do not have any fish, do you?" They answered him, "No." ⁶And he said to them, "Cast the net on the right side of the boat, and you will find some." Therefore they cast it, and now they were not able to haul it in from the multitude of fish. ⁷Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved says to Peter, "It is the Lord!" Therefore Simon Peter, having heard that it is the Lord, tied his outer garment around himself, for he was naked, and threw himself into the sea. ⁸But the other disciples came in the little boat—for they were not far from the land, but about two hundred cubits away—dragging the net of fish. ⁹So when they got out onto the land, they see a charcoal fire lying there, and fish lying upon it, and bread. ¹⁰Jesus says to them, "Bring some of the fish that you have just caught." ¹¹Therefore Simon Peter went up and hauled the net to the land, full of one hundred fifty-three large fish; and though there were so many, the net was not torn. ¹²Jesus says to them, "Come, have breakfast." Now none of the disciples dared to ask him, "Who are you?" knowing that it is the Lord. ¹³Jesus comes and takes the bread and gives it to them, and the fish likewise. ¹⁴This was now the third time Jesus was revealed to his disciples after he was raised from the dead. ¹⁵So when they had breakfasted, Jesus says to Simon Peter, "Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?" He says to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I have affection for you." He says to him, "Feed my lambs." ¹⁶He says to him again a second time, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" He says to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I have affection for you." He says to him, "Shepherd my sheep." ¹⁷He says to him the third time, "Simon, son of John, do you have affection for me?" Peter was grieved because he said to him the third time, "Do you have affection for me?" And he says to him, "Lord, you know all things; you know that I have affection for you." Jesus says to him, "Feed my sheep. ¹⁸Amen, amen, I tell you: when you were younger, you girded yourself and walked where you wished; but when you grow old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will gird you and carry you where you do not wish." ¹⁹Now this he said, signifying by what kind of death he would glorify God. And having said this, he says to him, "Follow me." ²⁰Peter, turning around, sees the disciple whom Jesus loved following, who also had leaned back on his chest at the supper and had said, "Lord, who is the one betraying you?" ²¹Therefore Peter, seeing this one, says to Jesus, "Lord, and what about this one?" ²²Jesus says to him, "If I wish him to remain until I come, what is that to you? You follow me." ²³Therefore this word went out among the brothers that that disciple does not die. Yet Jesus did not say to him that he does not die, but, "If I wish him to remain until I come, what is that to you?" ²⁴This is the disciple witnessing concerning these things, and the one who wrote these things; and we know that his witness is true. ²⁵But there are also many other things that Jesus did, which, if they should be written one by one, I suppose that not even the world itself would have room for the books being written. Amen.

Escolhas feitas — cada disputa que a tradução resolveu

Versículo	Fonte	Opções	Escolha	Motivo	Cat.
v1	Μετὰ ταῦτα	(T) After these things, (T) After this, (S) After these things	After these things	Preserves the plural demonstrative pronoun.	grammatical
v1	ἐφανέρωσεν	(T) shewed, (T) manifested, (T) revealed, (S) revealed	revealed	Provides a clear modern translation of the verb while preserving its repetition.	lexical
v2	ὁ λεγόμενος... ὁ ἀπὸ... οἱ τοῦ	(T) called... of... sons of, (S) the one called... the one from... the ones of	the one called... the one from... the ones of	Preserves the distinct definite article pattern grouping the disciples.	grammatical
v3	ὑπάγω / ἐρχόμεθα	(T) I go / we come, (T) I'm going / we are coming, (S) I am going / we are coming	I am going / we are coming	Preserves the grammatical number shift using contemporary progressive aspect.	grammatical
v4	Ἰησοῦς	(T) Jesus ... it, (T) Jesus ... Jesus, (S) Jesus ... Jesus	Jesus ... Jesus	Preserves the repetition of the proper name framing the verse.	textual
v5	μή τι προσφάγιον ἔχετε	(T) have ye any meat, (T) have you anything to eat, (S) you do not have any fish, do you?	you do not have any fish, do you?	Accurately reflects the interrogative particle that grammatically expects a negative answer.	grammatical
v6	βάλετε / ἔβαλον	(T) Cast / cast, (S) Cast / cast	Cast / cast	Preserves the repetition of the root verb for casting the net.	lexical
v7	ὁ μαθητὴς ἐκεῖνος	(T) That disciple, (T) Therefore that disciple, (S) that disciple	that disciple	Retains the explicit demonstrative pronoun.	grammatical
v7	ὃν ἠγάπα ὁ Ἰησοῦς	(T) whom Jesus loved, (T) whom Jesus was loving	whom Jesus loved	Standard rendering of the beloved disciple refrain.	stylistic
v7	ὁ κύριός	(T) the Lord ... the Lord, (S) the Lord ... the Lord	the Lord ... the Lord	Preserves the repetition of the divine title Kyrios.	interpretive
v8	τῷ πλοιαρίῳ	(T) the little boat, (T) a little ship, (T) the boat, (S) the little boat	the little boat	Preserves the diminutive definite article contrasting with the larger boat.	lexical
v9	κειμένην / ἐπικείμενον	(T) laid ... laid, (T) lying a ... lying on, (S) lying ... lying upon	lying ... lying upon	Preserves the cognate participle construction describing the scene.	grammatical
v10	τῶν ὀψαρίων	(T) of the fishes, (T) some of the fish, (S) the fish	the fish	Reflects the definite article pointing back to the specific fish.	grammatical
v11	τὸ δίκτυον	(T) the net ... the net	the net ... the net	Preserves the repetition of the definite article.	stylistic
v11	οὐκ ἐσχίσθη	(T) was not rent, (T) wasn't torn, (A) Undamaged unity	was not torn	Translates the physical intactness literally, permitting the ecclesiological symbolism embraced by several traditions.	interpretive
v12	δεῦτε ἀριστήσατε	(T) Come and dine, (T) Come and eat breakfast, (T) Come, have breakfast, (S) Come, have breakfast	Come, have breakfast	Modernizes the meal term and maintains the direct interjection.	lexical
v13	τὸν ἄρτον / τὸ ὀψάριον	(T) bread / fish, (T) the bread / the fish, (S) the bread / the fish	the bread / the fish	Retains the definite articles pointing to the specific meal, accommodating symbolic Eucharistic interpretations maintained by several traditions.	interpretive
v14	τοῦτο / ἐφανερώθη	(T) This / was manifested, (T) This / was revealed, (S) This / was revealed	This / was revealed	Retains the demonstrative and matches the verb repetition completing the inclusio with verse 1.	lexical
v15	Ἰωάννου	(T) Jonas, (T) Jonah, (T) John, (A) John	John	Adopts the textual variant reading for Peter's patronymic favored by modern critical texts.	textual
v15	ἀγαπᾷς / φιλῶ	(T) lovest / love, (T) love / have affection, (A) love / have affection	love / have affection	Preserves the synonym play between the distinct Greek verbs.	lexical
v16	ποίμαινε τὰ πρόβατά	(T) Feed my sheep, (T) Tend my sheep, (T) Shepherd my sheep	Shepherd my sheep	Reflects the lexical shift to 'poimaino'.	lexical
v17	φιλεῖς / φιλῶ	(T) lovest / love, (T) have affection / have affection, (A) have affection / have affection	have affection / have affection	Preserves the climax of the synonym play where Jesus adopts Peter's verb.	lexical
v17	βόσκε τὰ πρόβατά μου	(T) Feed my sheep, (A) Asserts Petrine jurisdiction, (A) Asserts shared pastoral mandate	Feed my sheep	Maintains literal phrasing, leaving the ecclesiological mandate unresolved as it is disputed among traditions.	interpretive
v18	ἀμὴν ἀμὴν	(T) Verily, verily, (T) Most certainly, (T) Amen, amen, (S) Amen, amen	Amen, amen	Retains the precise Hebrew loanword used as an interjection.	lexical
v18	ἐζώννυες / ζώσει	(T) girdedst / gird, (T) dressed / dress, (S) girded / gird	girded / gird	Preserves the cognate verb repetition.	grammatical
v18	ἤθελες / οὐ θέλεις	(T) wouldest / wouldest not, (T) wanted / don't want, (S) wished / do not wish	wished / do not wish	Preserves the contrastive repetition of the root verb for willing.	lexical
v19	τοῦτο / ἀκολούθει μοι	(T) This / Follow me, (S) this / Follow me	this / Follow me	Retains the demonstrative repetition and the precise command refrain.	stylistic
v20	ὃν ἠγάπα ὁ Ἰησοῦς / κύριε	(T) whom Jesus loved / Lord, (S) whom Jesus loved / Lord	whom Jesus loved / Lord	Retains the explicit refrain and the divine name.	interpretive
v21	οὗτος	(T) this man, (T) this one, (S) this one	this one	Retains the demonstrative pronoun without supplying an extraneous noun.	grammatical
v22	ἐὰν αὐτὸν θέλω μένειν ἕως ἔρχομαι... σύ μοι ἀκολούθει	(T) If I will that he tarry... follow thou me, (T) If I desire that he stay... you follow me, (S) If I wish him to remain until I come... you follow me	If I wish him to remain until I come... you follow me	Retains the emphatic personal command, reflecting the focus on individual discipleship broadly maintained among traditions.	interpretive
v23	οὗτος ὁ λόγος / ἐκεῖνος	(T) this saying / that disciple, (S) this word / that disciple	this word / that disciple	Retains the explicit demonstratives.	grammatical
v23	οὐκ ἀποθνῄσκει	(T) should not die / shall not die / doth not die, (T) wouldn't die / didn't say, (S) does not die	does not die	Preserves the exact present tense phrasing repeated three times in the verse.	grammatical
v24	οὗτός... τούτων... ταῦτα	(T) This... of these things... these things, (S) This... concerning these things... these things	This... concerning these things... these things	Preserves the specific demonstrative grouping defining the testimony's scope.	stylistic
v24	μαρτυρῶν / μαρτυρία	(T) testifieth / testimony, (T) bears witness / witness, (S) witnessing / witness	witnessing / witness	Preserves the cognate construction between the verbal participle and the noun.	grammatical
v25	γράφηται / γραφόμενα	(T) should be written / should be written, (T) written / written, (S) should be written / being written	should be written / being written	Preserves the cognate construction mapping the subjunctive verb and the participle.	grammatical
v25	χωρῆσαι τὰ γραφόμενα βιβλία	(T) the world itself could not contain the books, (A) Affirms written sufficiency, (A) Demonstrates necessity of Holy Tradition	not even the world itself would have room for the books being written	Translates the hyperbole literally, leaving the debate on the sufficiency of Scripture unresolved as it is disputed among traditions.	interpretive

Limites que vale a pena conhecer

This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.