← Voltar para Mateus 16 · Página completa de estudo de Mateus 16
Como o consenso para Mateus 16 foi construído
Cada passo do processo, exatamente como foi executado. Nada aqui é editado manualmente: as traduções vieram do banco de dados deste aplicativo, a leitura de cada tradição foi gerada em chamadas isoladas que não veem umas às outras (o isolamento evita a ancoragem; não as torna testemunhas independentes), e o consenso foi sintetizado apenas a partir dessas leituras.
- Modelo:
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)
- Gerado:
- Oct 11, 2026, 11:33 PM UTC
- Method:
- claim-audited, source-language-based, family-weighted
Passo 1Ler a passagem em todas as traduções de domínio público
7 translations, fed to every step. The AI-generated NCB is never a source.
WEB · World English Bible
KJV · King James Version
ASV · American Standard Version
YLT · Young's Literal Translation
Darby · Darby Translation
Webster · Webster Bible
DRC · Douay-Rheims (Challoner)
Passo 2Each eligible tradition reads the chapter — 12 voting profiles across 3 families
Perfis gerados por IA isolados que não veem uns aos outros. Cientes do gênero literário e honestos sobre material escasso.
Ancient Communions · The undivided-church and pre-Reformation episcopal traditions.
Catholicaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Roman Catholic tradition drawing on both Latin AND Eastern Catholic sources — and actually showing the Eastern dimension, not merely promising it: Scripture within Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium (the Catechism, the Latin Fathers, Augustine, Aquinas and the scholastics, the councils) together with the Eastern Catholic churches in communion with Rome and the Greek and Syriac Fathers they share. Sacramental and typological reading. Distinguish teaching shared across the whole Catholic communion from emphases specific to the Latin or to the Eastern Catholic churches.
Significado imediato — In Matthew 16, Jesus faces the Pharisees and Sadducees, denying them a sign from heaven except the 'sign of Jonah' (verses 1-4). He subsequently warns his disciples against the 'leaven'—the corrupting teaching—of these religious leaders (verses 5-12). In the region of Caesarea Philippi, Jesus asks his disciples about his identity. Simon boldly declares Jesus to be the Christ, the Son of the living God. In response, Jesus renames him Peter (Petros, Rock), declaring that upon this rock he will build his Church, which the gates of Hades will not overcome. He grants Peter the 'keys of the kingdom of heaven' and the authority to bind and loose (verses 13-19). Following this summit of revelation, Jesus immediately predicts his suffering, death, and resurrection. When Peter rebukes him for this, Jesus sharply rebukes Peter in return, calling him 'Satan' for prioritizing human concerns over God's (verses 21-23). The chapter concludes with Jesus defining true discipleship as a path of self-denial and taking up one's cross, warning of the final judgment when the Son of Man comes in glory (verses 24-28).
Reception — Matthew 16 is arguably the most foundational chapter for Catholic ecclesiology, serving as the primary locus for the doctrine of the Papacy. The First Vatican Council (*Pastor Aeternus*) infallibly defined that verses 18-19 confer upon Peter a primacy of true and proper jurisdiction over the whole Church. The 'keys' (verse 19) are understood typologically against the backdrop of the Davidic kingdom (as seen in Isaiah), representing the prime minister's supreme dynastic authority beneath the King. At the same time, the Catholic tradition holds a rich, multifaceted understanding of the 'rock' (verse 18). While Latin theology heavily emphasized the person and office of Peter, Eastern Catholic sources and Greek Fathers, notably John Chrysostom (*Homilies on the Gospel of Saint Matthew*), emphasized that the rock is the *faith* of Peter's confession. St. Augustine (*Retractations*) noted that the rock could be understood as Christ himself, whom Peter confessed, or as Peter himself. The Magisterium synthesizes these streams: the Church is built upon Peter the person precisely because of the enduring, objective reality of his orthodox confession (verse 16), which flesh and blood did not reveal (verse 17). Furthermore, the authority to 'bind and loose' (verse 19) is received as the juridical and doctrinal authority to govern the Church, teach infallibly, and explicitly, to absolve sins—a power the Council of Trent (*Decree on the Sacrament of Penance*) formally rooted in this passage.
Application — In Catholic application, this chapter permeates both liturgy and sacramental life. The Church celebrates the Feast of the Chair of Saint Peter to honor the pastoral authority Christ bestowed in verses 18-19. When a Pope is elected or teaches *ex cathedra*, he exercises the Petrine charism of the 'rock' established here. The power of the keys and binding/loosing (verse 19) is applied practically in the Sacrament of Reconciliation, where priests, participating in apostolic authority, pronounce absolution of sins. Finally, verses 24-25 heavily inform Catholic asceticism; 'taking up the cross' is applied to the daily sacrifices of the Christian life, the vows of religious life, and the endurance of martyrdom, uniting the believer's sufferings to the paschal mystery Christ predicts in verse 21.
Autoridades citadas:First Vatican Council — Pastor Aeternus · John Chrysostom — Homilies on the Gospel of Saint Matthew · Augustine of Hippo — Retractations · Council of Trent — Decree on the Sacrament of Penance (Session 14)
auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
- ✓ Jesus establishes Peter's primacy and the perpetual papal office by naming him t
- ✓ The 'rock' represents both the person of Peter and the orthodox faith of his Chr
- ✓ The authority to bind and loose is the foundation for the Church's disciplinary,
- ✓ True discipleship requires active participation in Christ's suffering through se
Eastern Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Eastern Orthodox tradition: Scripture within Holy Tradition and the consensus of the Fathers (patristic consensus). Emphases on theosis, the liturgy, the Septuagint text, apophatic mystery over precise definition, and the seven Ecumenical Councils.
Significado imediato — In the narrative of Matthew 16, Jesus rejects the Pharisees' and Sadducees' demand for a sign, warning His disciples against their 'leaven' (false teaching). The turning point of the Gospel occurs at Caesarea Philippi, where Peter confesses Jesus as the Christ, the Son of the living God. Jesus blesses Peter, declaring that upon 'this rock' He will build His assembly and grants him the keys to the kingdom to bind and loose. Immediately after, Jesus redefines His messiahship in terms of impending suffering and death, rebuking Peter for resisting this divine plan, and sets forth the radical cost of discipleship: denying oneself, taking up the cross, and losing one's life to save it. The chapter concludes with a promise that some present will see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.
Reception — Eastern Orthodox reception of Matthew 16 is foundational for its conciliar ecclesiology and ascetic theology. The interpretation of Christ's words to Peter (verses 18-19) is a central locus of distinction between Orthodox and Roman Catholic traditions. The patristic consensus, prominently voiced by John Chrysostom, identifies the 'rock' (petra) not as the individual person of Peter (Petros), but as the orthodox confession of faith itself—the acknowledgment of Christ's divinity. The Church is built upon this true confession, which Peter was the first to vocalize. Origen extends this by teaching that every believer who authentically makes this confession becomes a 'rock' and a 'Peter' within the Church. The authority to 'bind and loose' (verse 19) is understood as the grace of the priesthood and the sacramental authority of the episcopate. The tradition maintains that this authority was given to Peter as a prefigurement, but was bestowed equally upon all the apostles (as seen in Matthew 18 and the Gospel of John), and thus resides collegially in all bishops who maintain the orthodox faith, rather than exclusively in the Bishop of Rome. Verse 28, where Jesus states that some standing there will not taste death until they see His kingdom, is universally read by the Eastern Fathers as a direct prologue to the Transfiguration in the following chapter. Theologians like Gregory Palamas emphasize that the 'kingdom' seen by the apostles on Mount Tabor was the uncreated light and glory of God, revealing the eschatological reality of theosis.
Application — Liturgically, this chapter provides key readings for major feasts. Verses 13-19 are read on the Feast of Saints Peter and Paul (June 29), celebrating their shared apostolic labor and the foundational confession of faith. Verses 24-28 are appointed for the Sunday after the Exaltation of the Holy Cross, reinforcing that the theology of the cross is a lived ascetic reality. The call to 'take up his cross' (verse 24) is heavily emphasized in Orthodox spirituality as the daily 'podvig' (spiritual struggle) required to purify the heart of passions and progress toward theosis. Furthermore, the phrasing of 'binding and loosing' (verse 19) is integrated into the prayers of absolution within the sacrament of Confession, particularly in the Slavic tradition, affirming the priest's delegated authority to forgive sins.
Autoridades citadas:John Chrysostom — Homilies on Matthew · Origen — Commentary on Matthew · Gregory Palamas — Homilies
auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
- ✓ The 'rock' (petra) refers to Peter's confession of faith rather than his individ
- ✓ Every believer who makes the true confession of faith spiritually becomes a 'roc
- ✓ The power of the keys and of binding and loosing is seen as a sacramental author
- ✓ The vision of the Son of Man coming in His kingdom is interpreted as a prophecy
- ✓ The command to take up the cross grounds the Orthodox ascetic tradition of daily
- ✓ The authority of binding and loosing is invoked by the priest during the sacrame
Oriental Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Oriental Orthodox tradition (Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac): Scripture within the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils and the miaphysite Fathers (Athanasius, Cyril of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch). Deeply liturgical, ascetic, and typological reading; some of these churches hold wider canons.
Significado imediato — Matthew 16 presents a pivotal transition in Christ's ministry. Jesus rejects the Pharisees and Sadducees' demand for a sign, offering only the 'sign of Jonah' (16:1-4), and warns His disciples against their false teaching, metaphorically termed 'leaven' (16:5-12). At Caesarea Philippi, Jesus questions the disciples about His identity. Peter confesses Jesus as 'the Christ, the Son of the living God' (16:13-16). Jesus blesses Peter, declaring that upon the 'rock' of this divinely revealed confession, He will build His assembly (Church), granting the keys of the kingdom to bind and loose (16:17-19). Immediately after, Jesus foretells His suffering, death, and resurrection. When Peter objects, Jesus rebukes him sternly (16:21-23). The chapter concludes with the radical call to discipleship: taking up the cross, denying the self, and following Christ, in light of the coming judgment (16:24-28).
Reception — In the Oriental Orthodox tradition, this chapter is central to Christology, ecclesiology, and typology. Peter's confession (16:16) is heralded by Miaphysite Fathers as the bedrock of orthodox faith. Because Jesus asks about the 'Son of Man' (16:13) and Peter confesses the 'Son of the living God' (16:16), Severus of Antioch and others emphasize that the same subject is simultaneously human and divine, affirming the one incarnate nature of God the Word without separation. The declaration 'upon this rock I will build my church' (16:18) is definitively interpreted apart from Roman papal claims. Cyril of Alexandria and the wider Oriental tradition insist that the 'rock' is not Peter's person, but the unshakeable, orthodox faith of his confession. The 'keys of the kingdom' (16:19) represent the authority of the priesthood to bind and loose sins, an authority shared by all the apostles and their successors who hold to the orthodox faith. Additionally, the 'sign of Jonah' (16:4) is heavily emphasized as a perfect type of Christ’s three-day entombment and resurrection, a connection drawn early on by Syriac writers like Ephrem.
Application — The tradition applies Matthew 16 robustly in its liturgical, sacramental, and ascetic life. The typological 'sign of Jonah' (16:4) is physically commemorated in the Fast of Nineveh (Jonah's Fast), a strict three-day fast observed by the Syriac, Coptic, and Ethiopian churches a few weeks before Great Lent, preparing the faithful for the paschal mystery through repentance. The authority of the keys (16:19) is actualized in the sacrament of Repentance and Confession; the priest recites the prayer of absolution, trusting that what is loosed on earth is loosed in heaven. Finally, Christ’s command to 'deny himself, and take up his cross' (16:24) is the defining mandate of Oriental Orthodox spirituality. It animates the extensive monastic movements of Egypt, Syria, Armenia, and Ethiopia, where ascetics take up the 'cross' of lifelong self-denial. It is also deeply felt in the continuing legacy of martyrdom across these communions, where believers literally forfeit their earthly lives (16:25) for Christ's sake, trusting they will find true life in the resurrection.
Autoridades citadas:Cyril of Alexandria — Commentary on Matthew (Fragments) · Severus of Antioch — Cathedral Homilies · Ephrem the Syrian — Commentary on Tatian's Diatessaron
auditoria em nível de alegação (8 verificações)
- ✓ Jesus gives the sign of Jonah as the only sign to an evil generation.
- ✓ The sign of Jonah typifies Christ's death, descent, and resurrection.
- ✓ The sign of Jonah is commemorated liturgically in the three-day Fast of Nineveh.
- ✓ Peter confesses Jesus as the Christ, the Son of the living God.
- ✓ Peter's confession demonstrates the indivisible unity of Christ as one incarnate
- ✓ The 'rock' on which the Church is built is the orthodox faith of Peter's confess
- ✓ The keys of the kingdom grant the priesthood the authority to bind and loose sin
- ✓ Christ's command to take up the cross grounds the tradition's deep commitment to
Reformation Traditions · The magisterial churches of the sixteenth-century Reformation.
Anglican / Episcopalaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Anglican tradition (including the Episcopal Church): Scripture read with tradition and reason (Hooker); the Book of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles; a comprehensiveness spanning evangelical, anglo-catholic, and broad/progressive readings — name that spectrum where the passage has been read across it.
Significado imediato — The narrative begins with Jesus rejecting the Pharisees' and Sadducees' demand for a sign, offering only the 'sign of Jonah,' and subsequently warning his disciples against the 'leaven' (teaching) of these religious leaders. The chapter then pivots to the pivotal encounter at Caesarea Philippi. When asked about his identity, Peter confesses Jesus as 'the Christ, the Son of the living God.' Jesus blesses Peter, declaring him the 'rock' upon which the church will be built, and grants him the keys of the kingdom to bind and loose. Immediately following this high point, Jesus predicts his coming passion and death. When Peter objects, Jesus sharply rebukes him as a stumbling block setting his mind on human things. The chapter concludes with Jesus defining true discipleship as requiring self-denial, cross-bearing, and a willingness to lose one's life for his sake.
Reception — Matthew 16:18-19 has been a major locus of theological controversy and reflection within Anglicanism. In the context of the English Reformation, the text was heavily utilized to dismantle Roman Catholic claims of universal papal jurisdiction. Reformers like John Jewel argued that the 'rock' upon which the Church is built is either Christ himself or Peter's confession of faith, not Peter's person as an absolute monarch. Jewel and others insisted that the 'keys' were not exclusive to Peter but were granted to all the apostles and their successors for the preaching of the Gospel. Richard Hooker situated the power of 'binding and loosing' within the Church's broader ministry of spiritual discipline, jurisdiction, and the pronouncing of absolution. Over time, the Anglican tradition has exhibited a comprehensive spectrum of readings. Evangelicals have maintained the Reformers' emphasis on the confession of faith as the foundation of the Church and the priesthood of all believers. Conversely, later Anglo-Catholics and ecumenical dialogues, such as the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC), have reappraised the Petrine ministry, acknowledging Peter's special role in the New Testament as a potential model for a universal ministry of unity, provided it operates conciliarity rather than by absolute supremacy.
Application — The authority to 'bind and loose' (verse 19) is practically applied in the Book of Common Prayer through the pronounced Absolution in the Daily Office and Holy Communion, where the priest acts as the authorized minister of the keys, declaring God's forgiveness to the penitent. It also historically undergirds the Ordinal's conferring of authority upon priests to remit and retain sins. Furthermore, the command to 'take up his cross' (verse 24) profoundly shapes Anglican baptismal theology—where the newly baptized is signed with the cross—and informs the ascetical practices of self-denial emphasized during Lent and in the daily rhythm of the Christian life.
Autoridades citadas:John Jewel — An Apology of the Church of England · Richard Hooker — Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity · Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC) — Authority in the Church
auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
- ✓ Jesus rejects the religious leaders' demand for a sign and warns the disciples o
- ✓ Peter confesses Jesus as the Christ, and Jesus names him the rock, granting him
- ✓ Jesus predicts his suffering, rebukes Peter for his worldly opposition, and defi
- ✓ The 'rock' is traditionally interpreted as Christ or the confession of faith rat
- ✓ The power to bind and loose is understood as the ecclesiastical authority of dis
- ✓ The command to take up the cross informs the baptismal rite and the ascetical pr
Lutheranaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Lutheran tradition (the Book of Concord): the law–gospel distinction, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura held with the ecumenical creeds, the theology of the cross, and sacramental realism.
Significado imediato — In Matthew 16, Jesus confronts the religious authorities, rejecting their demand for a sign and warning his disciples against the 'leaven'—the false teaching—of the Pharisees and Sadducees (16:1-12). The chapter reaches a turning point at Caesarea Philippi, where Peter confesses Jesus as the Christ. Jesus declares that this truth was revealed by the Father, names Peter the rock upon which the church is built, and grants the keys of the kingdom (16:13-20). Immediately, Jesus foretells his suffering, death, and resurrection. When Peter objects, Jesus severely rebukes him for savoring the things of men over God, and he proceeds to teach that true discipleship requires self-denial, cross-bearing, and a willingness to lose one's life (16:21-28).
Reception — Matthew 16 is a foundational text in the Lutheran confessional documents, functioning as a primary battleground over ecclesiology, papal authority, and the nature of the gospel. Over against Roman Catholic claims of papal primacy, the Book of Concord heavily exegetes verses 18-19. Philip Melanchthon, in the 'Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope', argues that Peter speaks as a representative for the entire apostolic assembly. Therefore, the keys are granted to the whole church, not to a singular bishop. Furthermore, the 'rock' upon which the church is built is not Peter's person or an institutional office, but rather the confession of faith that Jesus is the Christ. The chapter also serves as a crucial narrative anchor for the 'theology of the cross' (theologia crucis). The tradition identifies Peter’s attempt to steer Jesus away from suffering (16:22) as the ultimate expression of the 'theology of glory'—humanity's fallen desire to find God in power, triumph, and fleshly reasoning rather than in suffering and sacrifice. Justification by faith alone is seen as implicitly affirmed when Jesus declares that Peter's confession relies entirely on divine revelation, not 'flesh and blood' (16:17).
Application — The Lutheran tradition directly incorporates this chapter into its liturgical and pastoral life through the Office of the Keys and Confession and Absolution. The power to 'bind and loose' (16:19) is practically exercised by called ministers acting on behalf of the congregation. Martin Luther's 'Small Catechism' instructs believers that this is the peculiar church power given by Christ to forgive the sins of penitent sinners (loosing) and to withhold forgiveness from the unrepentant as long as they do not repent (binding), which is as valid and certain in heaven as if Christ dealt with them Himself. In daily piety, verses 24-25 are applied as a call to vocational cross-bearing, wherein Christians expect suffering and the mortification of the flesh rather than worldly success, trusting that in losing their lives for Christ's sake, they find true life in the gospel.
Autoridades citadas:Philip Melanchthon — Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope · Martin Luther — Small Catechism
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ The 'rock' upon which Christ builds his church is the confession of faith that J
- ✓ The keys of the kingdom and the authority to bind and loose belong to the entire
- ✓ Peter's rejection of Christ's impending suffering and death typifies the false '
- ✓ The authority to bind and loose is exercised practically in the pastoral act of
- ✓ True discipleship involves vocational cross-bearing and self-denial, anticipatin
Reformed / Presbyterianaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Reformed tradition (Calvin; the Westminster Standards; the Heidelberg and Belgic confessions): the sovereignty of God and covenant theology, a redemptive-historical reading of Scripture, and the regulative principle.
Significado imediato — In this narrative, Jesus confronts the unbelief of the Pharisees and Sadducees, who demand a sign but cannot read the 'signs of the times.' He warns his disciples against their corrupt teaching, which he likens to leaven. At Caesarea Philippi, Jesus asks his disciples about his identity, leading to Peter's foundational confession that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God. Jesus declares that this insight was revealed by the Father, names Peter as a rock, promises to build his indestructible church, and gives the keys of the kingdom for binding and loosing. Jesus then predicts his suffering, death, and resurrection, rebuking Peter for his worldly opposition. The chapter concludes with Jesus defining true discipleship as self-denial and cross-bearing, warning of the final judgment when the Son of Man comes in his glory.
Reception — The Reformed tradition approaches Matthew 16 as a central text for ecclesiology, epistemology, and discipleship. Verse 17 is heavily emphasized as a proof of sovereign grace and total depravity; Calvin argues that Peter's confession relies entirely on divine illumination, as 'flesh and blood' is fundamentally blind to spiritual truth. Verses 18 and 19 are historic battlegrounds against Roman Catholic claims. In Reformed covenant theology, the 'rock' upon which the church is built is not Peter as an individual or a papal monarch, but rather the truth of Peter's confession—Christ himself. The 'keys of the kingdom' and the power to bind and loose (v. 19) are understood to establish the spiritual government of the church. The Westminster Confession of Faith and the Heidelberg Catechism identify these keys as the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of church discipline by appointed officers. Opening and shutting the kingdom is achieved not by a singular vicar, but by ministers declaring God's forgiveness to the penitent and elders applying censures to the impenitent. Finally, verses 24-25 heavily inform the Reformed doctrine of the Christian life, which Calvin characterizes fundamentally as a life of self-denial and union with Christ in his suffering.
Application — Reformed application of this chapter focuses primarily on church polity and personal piety. Presbyteries and kirk sessions operate on the conviction that they hold the 'keys of the kingdom' to exercise church discipline, which the Belgic Confession identifies as a mark of the true church. This discipline is applied for the reclamation of the sinner and the purity of the church, trusting that judgments made on earth according to the Word are bound in heaven. Personally, the tradition calls believers to recognize their absolute dependence on God the Father for spiritual understanding. Furthermore, it calls the Christian to practice daily mortification of the flesh ('deny himself') and joyful submission to providential hardships ('take up his cross'), trusting that losing one's life for Christ's sake is the only path to true life.
Autoridades citadas:John Calvin — Institutes of the Christian Religion · John Calvin — Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists Matthew, Mark, and Luke · Westminster Divines — Westminster Confession of Faith · Zacharias Ursinus and Caspar Olevianus — Heidelberg Catechism · Guido de Brès — Belgic Confession
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ Peter's confession was impossible by natural human intellect and required sovere
- ✓ The 'rock' is the doctrinal confession of Christ as the Son of God, not the pers
- ✓ The 'keys of the kingdom' confer authority upon church officers to administer th
- ✓ True discipleship requires active self-denial and the mortification of the flesh
- ✓ The formal application of church discipline by elders is a necessary practice of
Free-Church & Revival Traditions · Believers'-church, revival, and restorationist movements.
Baptistaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Baptist tradition (e.g. the 1689 Second London Confession, the Baptist Faith & Message — note the range): believers' baptism, congregational polity, liberty of conscience, a memorial reading of the ordinances, and strong emphasis on personal conversion and biblical authority.
Significado imediato — In Matthew 16, Jesus rejects the Pharisees' and Sadducees' demand for a sign, offering only the sign of Jonah (vv. 1-4), and warns His disciples against their teaching, which He metaphorically calls leaven (vv. 5-12). At Caesarea Philippi, Jesus questions His disciples about His identity, leading to Peter's declaration that He is the Christ, the Son of the living God (v. 16). Jesus blesses Peter, noting that this knowledge came by divine revelation (v. 17). Jesus then declares that upon 'this rock' He will build His church, granting the keys of the kingdom and the authority to bind and loose (vv. 18-19). Following this, Jesus plainly predicts His suffering, death, and resurrection. When Peter rebukes Him, Jesus sharply dismisses Peter as a stumbling block (vv. 21-23) and concludes by outlining the severe, individual cost of discipleship: self-denial, taking up the cross, and losing one's life to find it (vv. 24-28).
Reception — The Baptist reception of Matthew 16, particularly verses 16-19, fundamentally shapes the tradition's congregational ecclesiology and its doctrine of regenerate church membership. Rejecting readings that establish a papal or episcopal hierarchy, Baptists historically argue that the 'rock' (v. 18) refers to the substance of Peter's confession or to Christ Himself as the foundation. John Gill, in his 'Exposition of the Old and New Testaments', forcefully insists the rock is Christ, whom Peter confessed, rather than Peter's person. The blessing upon Peter for receiving direct, internal revelation from the Father (v. 17) is viewed as the paradigm for all believers, anchoring the Baptist insistence on a regenerate church composed only of those who have personally experienced divine illumination and conversion. Furthermore, Baptists democratize the 'keys of the kingdom' and the authority to bind and loose (v. 19). While spoken to Peter here, this authority is understood across the tradition to belong to the local, gathered congregation. John L. Dagg, in his 'Manual of Church Order', articulates that the local church exercises these keys when it admits members upon a credible profession of faith or excludes them through church discipline, effectively binding and loosing on earth what aligns with the gospel from heaven. While the 'Second London Baptist Confession of Faith' (1689) applies Christ's promise that the gates of hell shall not prevail (v. 18) to the invincibility of the universal church, a distinct minority movement known as Landmarkism has historically interpreted this verse as a promise of the unbroken, historical succession of local Baptist congregations from the time of Christ.
Application — In Baptist life, Matthew 16 is applied directly to congregational governance, evangelism, and the requirements of personal discipleship. The 'keys' (v. 19) are exercised practically in congregational business meetings where the local body votes to receive new believers into membership (usually following believers' baptism, which acts as the outward sign of Peter's confession in v. 16) or to excommunicate unrepentant members. The individual mandate in verses 24-25 is heavily emphasized in Baptist preaching and invitations as a call to voluntaristic, costly faith. It reinforces the tradition's rejection of nominal, state, or inherited religion by insisting that true faith requires a personal, conscious decision to deny oneself and follow Christ.
Autoridades citadas:John Gill — Exposition of the Old and New Testaments · John L. Dagg — Manual of Church Order · Second London Baptist Confession of Faith — 1689 Second London Baptist Confession of Faith
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ The 'rock' refers to Christ or the truth of Peter's confession, opposing any int
- ✓ The 'keys of the kingdom' and the authority to bind and loose belong to the loca
- ✓ Peter's divinely revealed confession serves as the necessary paradigm for regene
- ✓ Discipleship requires personal, voluntary self-denial and cross-bearing, reinfor
- ✓ The exercise of the keys happens practically in congregational meetings through
Methodist / Wesleyan / Holinessaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Wesleyan-Holiness tradition: prevenient grace and free response, sanctification and entire sanctification / Christian perfection, the Wesleyan quadrilateral (Scripture primary, with tradition, reason, and experience), and warm-hearted practical piety.
Significado imediato — In this narrative chapter, Jesus refuses the religious leaders' demand for a sign, warns his disciples against the corrupt teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees, elicits Peter's confession of him as the Christ, and predicts his own suffering. Following Peter's rebuke and Jesus's sharp correction, the chapter concludes with Jesus outlining the stringent cost of discipleship and his future return to judge all according to their deeds.
Reception — The Wesleyan-Holiness tradition reads this chapter with a strong emphasis on practical piety and the conditions of ongoing sanctification. Against deterministic soteriologies, early Methodists like John Fletcher highlighted verse 27 as a key prooftext for final justification by works, demonstrating that while initial salvation is by faith alone, the final judgment evaluates the believer's subsequent fruits. In his Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament, John Wesley interpreted the rock in verse 18 as either Christ himself or Peter's confession, firmly rejecting papal supremacy, and understood the keys as the authority to preach the gospel and exercise church discipline. Furthermore, Wesley viewed the sharp transition from Peter's divine revelation in verse 17 to his satanic stumbling block in verse 23 as a warning against spiritual pride and the false security that previous grace guarantees future faithfulness.
Application — Methodists apply Jesus's command to deny oneself and take up the cross in verse 24 as the non-negotiable daily practice of Christian perfection. It is not viewed merely as a call to initial conversion, but as the enduring mechanism for mortifying the flesh and removing the inward leaven of sin. Warm-hearted practical piety requires believers to intentionally choose the cross, engaging in works of mercy and piety even when contrary to natural desires, thereby ensuring they do not forfeit their life as warned in verse 26.
Autoridades citadas:John Wesley — Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament · John Wesley — Sermons on Several Occasions · John Fletcher — Checks to Antinomianism
auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
- ✓ The rock upon which the church is built is Christ or the confession of faith, no
- ✓ The transition from Peter's confession to his rebuke demonstrates the danger of
- ✓ Self-denial and taking up the cross are perpetual, daily requirements for ongoin
- ✓ The Son of Man's future judgment based on works validates the Wesleyan doctrine
Anabaptist / Mennoniteaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Anabaptist tradition (Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite): a Jesus-centered reading with the Sermon on the Mount as normative, believers' baptism, nonviolence and nonresistance, simple living, communal discernment, and the church as a visible community distinct from worldly power.
Significado imediato — In Matthew 16, Jesus confronts the demand for signs from the religious establishment and warns his disciples against their corrupting teaching, referring to it as leaven. Arriving in Caesarea Philippi, Jesus elicits Peter's confession that he is the Christ. Jesus blesses this revelation, declaring he will build his assembly on this rock and granting the keys of the kingdom to bind and loose. Immediately following this establishment of his community, Jesus predicts his own suffering and death. When Peter rebukes him, Jesus harshly dismisses Peter's worldly aversion to suffering ('Get behind me, Satan') and teaches that true discipleship requires self-denial, taking up one's cross, and losing one's life to save it.
Reception — The Anabaptist tradition receives Matthew 16 as a foundational text for its ecclesiology and its theology of discipleship (Nachfolge). Christ's granting of the 'keys of the kingdom' (v. 19) is radically democratized and localized. Rather than viewing the keys as establishing a clerical or papal hierarchy, early Anabaptist leaders like Balthasar Hubmaier, in 'On the Christian Ban', argued that the authority to bind and loose belongs to the visible, local congregation of baptized believers. This authority is exercised through communal discernment and church discipline to maintain a pure community distinct from worldly power. Furthermore, Jesus' rebuke of Peter (v. 23) is read as a definitive rejection of political, coercive messiahship. Taking up the cross (v. 24) is not spiritualized as general human hardship but is understood as the literal persecution expected for following Christ's nonviolent teachings. Menno Simons, in 'The Cross of the Saints', emphasized that cross-bearing is the inevitable result of righteous living in a wicked world. The call to lose one's life for Christ's sake (v. 25) became a core text for Anabaptist martyrology, prominently framing the accounts in Thieleman J. van Braght's 'Martyrs Mirror'.
Application — In practice, Anabaptist and Mennonite communities apply this chapter by emphasizing discipleship as a daily, visible commitment to the way of the cross. To 'take up the cross' (v. 24) is applied as a call to nonresistance, simple living, and the willingness to suffer rather than to inflict harm or conform to the world's reliance on the sword. The 'keys' (v. 19) are applied locally through congregational meetings where church discipline, fraternal admonition, and communal discernment are practiced, often alongside readings from Matthew 18. Believers are called to reject the 'leaven' of worldly religious and political power (v. 6), trusting that the church built upon the confession of Christ (v. 16-18) will endure against the gates of Hades precisely through its faithful, nonviolent witness.
Autoridades citadas:Balthasar Hubmaier — On the Christian Ban · Menno Simons — The Cross of the Saints · Thieleman J. van Braght — Martyrs Mirror
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ The keys of the kingdom and the power of binding and loosing belong to the local
- ✓ Jesus' rebuke of Peter represents a rejection of worldly, coercive power in favo
- ✓ Taking up the cross refers to the literal suffering and persecution that believe
- ✓ Losing one's life for Christ's sake is a foundational call to faithful martyrdom
- ✓ Discipleship requires a daily, visible commitment to nonresistance, simple livin
Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal tradition (Assemblies of God, Church of God, and kindred bodies): the present continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine healing, and expectancy of God's present action, read within Nicene Trinitarian faith. Do NOT attribute Word-of-Faith / prosperity or later neo-charismatic distinctives to classical Pentecostalism generally.
Significado imediato — Matthew 16 functions as a critical turning point in the Gospel narrative. Jesus rejects the Pharisees' and Sadducees' demand for a sign from heaven, offering only the sign of Jonah (vv. 1-4). He warns his disciples against the 'leaven'—the corrupt teaching—of these religious leaders (vv. 5-12). At Caesarea Philippi, Peter confesses Jesus as the Christ, the Son of the living God, prompting Jesus to declare that this revelation came from the Father and that upon this rock He will build His church, granting it the keys of the kingdom and the authority to bind and loose (vv. 13-19). Jesus immediately introduces the necessity of His suffering, death, and resurrection. When Peter rebukes Him, Jesus sharply corrects him (vv. 21-23) and issues a universal call to self-denial, taking up the cross, and losing one's life to find it (vv. 24-28).
Reception — Classical Pentecostalism reads this chapter through its emphases on supernatural revelation, the authority of the Spirit-empowered church, and the necessity of personal consecration. The Pharisees' demand for a sign (vv. 1-4) is viewed not as a blanket prohibition against miraculous signs—which Pentecostals expect to accompany the preaching of the gospel—but as a rebuke of skeptical, unbelieving demands that refuse to submit to God. Peter's confession (vv. 16-17) is received as the paradigm for spiritual epistemology: knowing Jesus truly as the Christ requires direct, supernatural revelation from the Father, bypassing mere 'flesh and blood' intellect. The declaration to build the church upon the 'rock' (v. 18) is generally interpreted by Pentecostal scholars like Stanley M. Horton as pointing to the divine revelation of Jesus Himself as the Christ, rather than the person of Peter. Furthermore, the 'gates of Hades' and the keys for 'binding and loosing' (v. 19) are deeply significant in Pentecostal theology. Theologians such as J. Rodman Williams interpret these verses as the delegation of spiritual authority to the church, authorizing believers to engage in spiritual warfare and overcome demonic strongholds.
Application — In Pentecostal practice, this chapter heavily influences prayer, evangelism, and discipleship. The language of 'binding and loosing' (v. 19) is a standard feature of Pentecostal intercessory prayer. Believers actively 'bind' demonic influences, sickness, and spiritual opposition, and 'loose' healing, deliverance, and the power of the Holy Spirit. The promise that the gates of Hades will not prevail (v. 18) is invoked to encourage a militant, advancing posture in global missions, expecting the church to triumph over dark spiritual forces. Additionally, the call to take up the cross and deny oneself (vv. 24-25) is preached as the essential prerequisite for operating in the Spirit's power. True Pentecostal vitality is seen as inseparable from absolute surrender to the lordship of Christ and a willingness to embrace the cost of discipleship.
Autoridades citadas:Stanley M. Horton — Matthew · J. Rodman Williams — Renewal Theology
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ The refusal to provide a sign to the Pharisees is understood as a rebuke of skep
- ✓ True knowledge of Jesus' identity requires direct, supernatural revelation from
- ✓ The rock upon which the church is built is primarily identified as the revelatio
- ✓ The authority to bind and loose is applied directly to intercessory prayer and s
- ✓ Self-denial and taking up the cross are viewed as essential prerequisites for sp
Seventh-day Adventistaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Seventh-day Adventist tradition: the seventh-day Sabbath, the great-controversy theme, conditional immortality, sanctuary theology, and a historicist reading of prophecy.
Significado imediato — The narrative marks a pivotal transition in Jesus' ministry. It begins with Jesus refusing to provide a sign to the religious leaders and warning His disciples against their corrupt teaching ('leaven'). At Caesarea Philippi, Jesus elicits Peter's confession of His identity as the Christ. Jesus blesses Peter, declares He will build His church, and then immediately predicts His impending suffering, death, and resurrection. When Peter rebukes Him for this, Jesus delivers a severe counter-rebuke. The chapter concludes with Jesus outlining the severe cost of discipleship—taking up one's cross—and promising a future glorious return to reward humanity according to their works.
Reception — Seventh-day Adventist theology approaches Matthew 16 through robustly Protestant hermeneutics, amplified by its great-controversy and eschatological frameworks. Verses 18–19 are foundational to Adventist ecclesiology, read in direct opposition to papal claims of primacy. Noting the Greek distinction between 'Petros' (a rolling stone) and 'petra' (a bedrock), Adventists hold that the church is built solely upon Christ, the 'Son of the living God.' Ellen G. White emphasizes in 'The Desire of Ages' that the 'keys of the kingdom' do not represent ecclesiastical authority vested in a human hierarchy to forgive sins, but rather the words of Christ—the Holy Scriptures—which bind and loose by declaring the divine terms of salvation. The confrontation in verses 22–23 is heavily emphasized as a manifestation of the great controversy between Christ and Satan. White asserts that Satan actively used Peter's misplaced affection to tempt Jesus away from the cross. Thus, the rebuke, 'Get behind me, Satan,' was addressed directly to the adversary speaking through the disciple. Verse 26 ('lose his own soul') is understood through the lens of conditional immortality. Adventists maintain that the Greek word 'psuche' here does not refer to a naturally immortal entity that survives the body, but to the holistic life or existence of a person, which can be permanently destroyed if not secured in Christ. Finally, verse 27 ('the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father... and then he shall reward every man according to his works') is a crucial text for Adventist eschatology. The 'Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary' points out that because Christ brings His rewards with Him at the Second Advent, a judgment must necessarily take place beforehand to determine what those rewards will be, indirectly supporting the doctrine of the pre-Advent (or investigative) judgment occurring in the heavenly sanctuary.
Application — In Adventist practice, Matthew 16 is frequently preached to frame the cost and the hope of the Christian life. The call to 'take up his cross' (verse 24) is often applied to the real-world sacrifices required by fidelity to distinctive biblical truths—such as keeping the seventh-day Sabbath—which can invite economic loss or social alienation. The warning against the 'leaven' of the Pharisees (verses 6-12) is invoked to encourage vigilance against human traditions that compromise Scripture. Verse 27 serves as a focal point for the 'blessed hope,' animating the church's global evangelistic mission with the promise that Christ will soon return visibly to render justice and bestow eternal life.
Autoridades citadas:Ellen G. White — The Desire of Ages · Ellen G. White — The Desire of Ages · Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, vol. 5 — Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary
auditoria em nível de alegação (5 verificações)
- ✓ The 'rock' of the church is Christ, not Peter, and the 'keys' represent the life
- ✓ Peter's rebuke of Jesus was a direct temptation orchestrated by Satan to prevent
- ✓ The term 'soul' refers to the whole person's life and existence, which is mortal
- ✓ The distribution of rewards at the Second Coming points to the necessity of a pr
- ✓ Taking up the cross is applied to the sacrifices necessary for adhering to disti
Restorationist / Churches of Christaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Restoration Movement tradition (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches — formally non-creedal): restore New Testament Christianity, 'speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent,' reading by direct command, apostolic example, and necessary inference; baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; the weekly Lord's Supper.
Significado imediato — Jesus rebukes the Pharisees' and Sadducees' demand for a sign, offering only the sign of Jonah, and warns his disciples against their teaching, comparing it to leaven. At Caesarea Philippi, Peter confesses Jesus as the Christ, the Son of the living God. Jesus declares this revealed truth to be the rock upon which he will build his future assembly (church), granting Peter the keys of the kingdom to bind and loose. Jesus then explicitly predicts his suffering, death, and resurrection, rebukes Peter for opposing this divine necessity, and sets the terms of discipleship as self-denial and cross-bearing. He concludes by stating that some standing there will not taste death before seeing the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.
Reception — Within the Restoration Movement (Churches of Christ and Christian Churches), Matthew 16 is a paramount text defining ecclesiology, eschatology, and the requirements for Christian unity. Peter's statement (verse 16) is universally identified as 'the Good Confession.' Early movement leaders like Alexander Campbell argued that this singular confession of faith—rather than complex human creeds—was the only legitimate and necessary basis for Christian fellowship and church membership. Christ's statement 'upon this rock I will build my church' (verse 18) is exegetically foundational. Commentators such as J.W. McGarvey stress two points here: first, the 'rock' is not Peter, but the truth Peter confessed; second, the future tense ('I will build') demonstrates that the church did not yet exist in the Old Testament or during John the Baptist's life, but was to be established later at Pentecost. Furthermore, verse 28 ('shall not taste of death') serves as a primary pillar for the tradition's amillennial eschatology. Theologians and debaters like Foy E. Wallace Jr. utilized this verse extensively to refute Premillennialism, insisting that the kingdom is synonymous with the church and was established with power in the first century, rather than being postponed due to Jewish rejection.
Application — Congregations apply this chapter most visibly in the practice of baptism. Before a candidate is immersed for the remission of sins, they are asked to publicly make 'the Good Confession'—repeating the substance of verse 16, affirming that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God. The phrase 'my church' (verse 18) is frequently invoked in preaching to defend the use of the designation 'Church of Christ' (alongside Romans 16:16), pointing to Christ's exclusive ownership and ownership as a mark of the true New Testament pattern over denominational names. The 'keys of the kingdom' (verse 19) are understood to have been used by Peter on the Day of Pentecost to unlock the gospel to the Jews, and later to the Gentiles at Cornelius's house, linking this chapter inextricably to the plan of salvation taught in Acts.
Autoridades citadas:Alexander Campbell — The Christian System · J.W. McGarvey — Commentary on Matthew and Mark · Foy E. Wallace Jr. — God's Prophetic Word
auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
- ✓ Peter's declaration that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, constitutes the 'G
- ✓ The 'rock' upon which the church is built is the foundational truth that Jesus i
- ✓ The phrase 'I will build' indicates that the church was a future institution at
- ✓ The promise that some present would not taste death before seeing the kingdom ar
- ✓ Candidates for baptism are required to vocally repeat Peter's confession of fait
- ✓ Christ's possessive phrasing 'my church' is used to identify the scriptural name
Passo 3Painéis sem direito a voto e apêndice comparativo
Estes fundamentam as notas e a tradução, e são relatados aqui, mas nunca são contabilizados na votação.
Academic textual-historical analysisaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Academic textual-historical analysis: philology and the original-language text, textual criticism, ancient Near Eastern (and, for the NT, Greco-Roman) context, literary genre and form, composition and dating debates, and reception history. Describe scholarly positions and their evidence without confessional commitment. This panel informs the textual notes and the rendering; it is never a church vote.
Significado imediato — Academic analysis approaches Matthew 16 through the lenses of textual criticism, redaction criticism, and philology. Textually, verses 2b-3 (the saying about the red sky) are absent from the earliest Alexandrian manuscripts (Sinaiticus, Vaticanus) and are widely considered a later interpolation, likely assimilated from oral tradition or Luke 12. Geographically, the setting at Caesarea Philippi (v. 13)—a center of imperial and Pan worship—is seen by historians as providing a stark, deliberate contrast for the declaration of Jesus' messianic identity. Redaction critics note that Matthew heavily edits his source (Mark 8). Where Mark has Jesus warn against the 'leaven of the Pharisees and of Herod', Matthew alters it to 'the Pharisees and Sadducees', explicitly defining 'leaven' not as hypocrisy but as 'teaching' (v. 12), reflecting the later Matthean community's specific polemical boundary-drawing against emergent Rabbinic Judaism. The confession (vv. 16-19) contains material unique to Matthew (M). Philologically, the famous wordplay between 'Peter' (Petros) and 'rock' (petra) is central. The use of the word 'church' (ekklesia) in verse 18 is highly significant, occurring only here and in Matthew 18 within the canonical Gospels. The 'keys of the kingdom' and the authority of 'binding and loosing' (v. 19) draw heavily on ancient Near Eastern administrative imagery (akin to the vizier in Isaiah 22) and, more directly, on rabbinic halakhic terminology, where 'binding' meant to forbid an action and 'loosing' meant to permit it. Finally, verse 28 presents a prime example of early Christian imminent eschatology, presenting a timeline where the Son of Man's coming was expected within the lifetime of the bystanders.
Reception — The historical and canonical reception of Matthew 16, particularly verses 17-19, has been dominated by the 'Wirkungsgeschichte' (history of effects) concerning papal primacy. However, critical scholarship focuses on the historical origins of the logion. Form critics, most notably Rudolf Bultmann, argued that verses 17-19 could not have been spoken by the historical Jesus, interpreting the passage as a post-Easter retrojection created by the early Palestinian church to legitimize Peter's authority over the community. Conversely, scholars like Oscar Cullmann suggested that the saying might trace back to an authentic post-resurrection tradition that Matthew relocated to the ministry of the historical Jesus at Caesarea Philippi. Scholars such as Ulrich Luz emphasize that while later centuries received this text as establishing a succession of Roman pontiffs, its original historical reception within the Matthean community was likely about Peter's foundational role as a guarantor of Jesus' tradition and his supreme halakhic teaching authority for a Jewish-Christian group navigating its break from the synagogue.
Application — In academic application, Matthew 16 functions as a foundational pedagogical text for teaching critical methodologies. Textual critics apply verses 2b-3 to demonstrate the principles of manuscript evaluation and the tendency of scribes to harmonize texts. Redaction critics apply the chapter to reconstruct the sociological and theological landscape of the Matthean community, using Jesus' instruction to 'beware the teaching of the Pharisees' (v. 12) to trace the historical parting of the ways between early Christianity and formative Judaism. Furthermore, scholars use the apocalyptic timeline in verse 28 to anchor discussions regarding the 'historical Jesus' and the imminent eschatological expectations of the earliest Jesus movement, analyzing how later Gospel traditions had to continually reinterpret delayed parousia.
Autoridades citadas:Bruce M. Metzger — A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament · W.D. Davies and Dale C. Allison — A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew · Rudolf Bultmann — History of the Synoptic Tradition · Oscar Cullmann — Peter: Disciple, Apostle, Martyr · Ulrich Luz — Matthew 8-20: A Commentary
auditoria em nível de alegação (6 verificações)
- ✓ Verses 2b-3 are widely considered a later textual interpolation absent from the
- ✓ Matthew explicitly alters Markan source material to redefine the 'leaven' as the
- ✓ The terms 'binding' and 'loosing' denote rabbinic halakhic authority to forbid o
- ✓ Form critics frequently argue that the blessing of Peter and the establishment o
- ✓ The apocalyptic prediction regarding the Son of Man's arrival reflects early Chr
- ✓ Scholars apply this chapter pedagogically to demonstrate the methodology of reda
Jewish interpretationmaterial escassoaudit ✓
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Jewish interpretation of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible books only; do not treat the New Testament as Scripture, and address it only historically if at all). Distinguish rabbinic (Talmud, Midrash), medieval (Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and the classical mefarshim), and modern (including critical and denominational) voices rather than presenting one uniform Jewish position. This panel informs, and is reported, but never a Christian church vote.
Significado imediato — In reading Matthew 16 as a first-century historical source, modern Jewish readers observe a narrative that reflects intra-Jewish debates of the Second Temple period. The chapter's initial pairing of 'Pharisees and Sadducees' (vv. 1, 6) asking for a sign is often viewed by Jewish historians as a later literary construct, given that these two sects held deeply opposed theological, social, and political positions. The narrative uses familiar Jewish didactic forms, such as testing a teacher, demanding signs, and employing pedagogical metaphors like leaven to represent teaching or the evil inclination.
Reception — Because Judaism does not recognize the New Testament as Scripture, this chapter possesses no classical rabbinic, medieval, or normative theological reception history. It is entirely absent from Jewish liturgy and halakhah. However, modern Jewish historians and critical scholars of early Christianity extensively analyze the chapter for its preservation of First-Century Jewish idioms. For example, Jesus' warning against the 'leaven' (v. 12) mirrors classical rabbinic metaphors where chametz (leaven) symbolizes corrupting influences or the yetzer hara (evil inclination). When Jesus asks about the 'Son of Man' (v. 13), Jewish scholars debate whether this reflects the apocalyptic figure of Daniel 7 or merely an Aramaic idiom (bar nasha) meaning 'a person' or serving as a circumlocution for 'myself.' The most prominent Jewish feature of the chapter is the commission to Peter (v. 19). The terms 'bind' and 'loose' are recognized as direct translations of the rabbinic Hebrew and Aramaic legal terms asar (to prohibit) and hittir or shere (to permit). Jewish scholars note that Jesus is portrayed here as conferring halakhic (legal/interpretive) authority upon Peter, a concept deeply rooted in early rabbinic thought regarding legislative authority.
Application — As a non-canonical and non-authoritative text, Matthew 16 is neither read, prayed, nor applied in Jewish religious life. Its application is strictly academic and dialogical, utilized by Jewish historians to reconstruct the diverse sectarian landscape of first-century Galilee and Judea, and to trace the Jewish halakhic language retained within the early Jesus movement.
Autoridades citadas:Claude Montefiore — The Synoptic Gospels · Geza Vermes — Jesus the Jew · Amy-Jill Levine and Marc Zvi Brettler — The Jewish Annotated New Testament
auditoria em nível de alegação (4 verificações)
- ✓ The depiction of Pharisees and Sadducees operating together against Jesus is his
- ✓ The term 'Son of Man' can be understood through its Aramaic linguistic backgroun
- ✓ The authority to 'bind and loose' represents the transfer of halakhic authority
- ✓ The text has no religious or liturgical application in Judaism, as it falls outs
Apêndice comparativo — fora da lista niceno-trinitariana (Latter-day Saint, Jehovah's Witnesses)
Latter-day Saint
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Latter-day Saint reading (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints): the Bible read alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, with living prophets and continuing revelation, and the Joseph Smith Translation where relevant. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Significado imediato — In the narrative of Matthew 16, Jesus confronts the Pharisees and Sadducees who demand a sign, subsequently warning His disciples to beware of their 'leaven,' which He identifies as their teaching. Journeying to Caesarea Philippi, Jesus questions His disciples about His identity. Simon Peter confesses Jesus as the Christ, the Son of the living God. Jesus declares Peter blessed, affirming that this truth was revealed to him by God the Father, not by flesh and blood. Jesus then announces that He will build His church upon 'this rock,' promises Peter the keys of the kingdom of heaven to bind and loose, and commands the disciples to keep His identity secret. Following this, Jesus plainly prophesies His impending suffering, death, and resurrection. When Peter rebukes Him, Jesus severely rebukes Peter in turn. Jesus concludes by laying out the strict terms of discipleship: self-denial, taking up the cross, and losing one's life to find it, anticipating the future coming of the Son of Man in glory.
Reception — Matthew 16:13-19 forms a critical foundation for Latter-day Saint ecclesiology and epistemology. When Jesus states that 'flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father' (verse 17) and 'upon this rock I will build my church' (verse 18), the Latter-day Saint tradition understands the 'rock' not as Peter himself, nor merely his confession, but as the underlying principle of continuing divine revelation. Joseph Smith taught explicitly that the Church is built upon the rock of revelation, meaning that a true witness of Christ comes only through the Holy Ghost. Furthermore, the 'keys of the kingdom' promised in verse 19 are interpreted as literal priesthood authority to govern the Church and administer its ordinances. Latter-day Saints teach that these keys—including the sealing power to 'bind on earth' and 'bind in heaven'—were given to Peter, James, and John, who later returned as resurrected beings to restore this same Melchizedek Priesthood authority to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery (recorded in Doctrine and Covenants 27). Additionally, the tradition relies on the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) for verse 24, which expands the text to define the cross: 'And now for a man to take up his cross, is to deny himself all ungodliness, and every worldly lust, and keep my commandments.'
Application — Latter-day Saints apply this chapter by seeking their own personal revelation to obtain a firm testimony that Jesus is the Christ, striving to build their faith upon that 'rock' rather than on human intellect or tradition. The priesthood keys promised to Peter are revered as currently active upon the earth, held by the President of the Church and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. The authority to bind on earth and in heaven is actively practiced in Latter-day Saint temples, where the sealing power is utilized to unite couples and families for eternity. Finally, believers are exhorted to 'take up their cross' by explicitly striving to deny themselves of ungodliness and worldly lusts, applying the specific definition provided by the Joseph Smith Translation.
Autoridades citadas:Joseph Smith — Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Joseph Smith · Joseph Smith — Doctrine and Covenants · Joseph Smith — Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible
Jehovah's Witnesses
Lente fornecida ao modelo:Jehovah's Witness reading (Watch Tower Society): attention to the divine name, God's Kingdom as a real government, conditional immortality, and a non-Trinitarian Christology. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Significado imediato — In Matthew 16, Jesus confronts the Pharisees and Sadducees, refusing them a sign from heaven except the sign of Jonah. He warns his disciples against the 'leaven' or teachings of these religious leaders. The chapter shifts to Caesarea Philippi, where Jesus asks his disciples about his identity. Peter accurately identifies him as 'the Christ, the Son of the living God.' Jesus blesses Peter, declaring that he will build his congregation on 'this rock' and gives Peter the 'keys of the Kingdom of Heaven.' Afterward, Jesus clearly predicts his impending suffering and death. When Peter attempts to dissuade him, Jesus strongly rebukes Peter for thinking the thoughts of men rather than of God. Jesus concludes by laying out the terms of discipleship, requiring self-denial and the carrying of one's cross or stake, and promises that some standing there will see the Son of Man coming in his Kingdom.
Reception — Jehovah's Witnesses understand Peter's confession in verse 16 as evidence of a non-Trinitarian Christology: Jesus is the Son of God, a distinct and subordinate being to Jehovah, not God himself. Regarding verse 18, they teach that the 'rock' (petra) upon which the congregation is built is Jesus Christ, while Peter (petros) is merely a 'piece of rock.' This interpretation explicitly rejects the Catholic doctrine of papal primacy. The 'keys of the kingdom' in verse 19 are understood as the privilege given to Peter to unlock the knowledge and opportunity for entering the heavenly kingdom to three distinct groups: the Jews at Pentecost 33 C.E., the Samaritans shortly after, and the Gentiles starting with Cornelius in 36 C.E. In verses 25 and 26, the term often translated 'soul' (psyche) is read through the lens of conditional immortality, representing the person's physical life rather than an immortal entity that survives death. Verse 28's promise that some will see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom is understood to have been fulfilled in the Transfiguration, which occurs immediately afterward in the narrative, serving as a preview of Christ's future glorious kingdom rule.
Application — Witnesses apply verse 24 as a call to Christian dedication and baptism, emphasizing that disciples must 'disown' themselves, submitting entirely to Jehovah's will, and be willing to bear the reproach associated with following Christ. They actively heed the warning against the 'leaven' of the Pharisees by strictly separating themselves from the teachings and practices of Christendom, which they view as modern-day false religion. Peter's well-meaning but misguided rebuke in verse 22 serves as a pastoral warning against allowing human sentimentality to compromise one's obedience to God's purpose, urging believers to always maintain a spiritual perspective focused on the real government of God's Kingdom.
Autoridades citadas:Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Jesus—The Way, the Truth, the Life
Passo 4Estabelecer a base no idioma original
A tradução é construída a partir do texto fonte, não da maioria em inglês.
Base textual — Provided Greek text (public domain, reflecting standard critical editions).
Nomes divinos — Theos (God), Kyrios (Lord)
- v2: The weather saying in 2b-3 ('When it is evening... signs of the times') is omitted in several major early manuscript traditions.
- v4: Some manuscripts omit the phrase 'the prophet' after 'Jonah'.
- v20: Some manuscripts omit 'Jesus' and read only 'that he is the Christ'.
- v1: (c) Definite article pattern: 'οἱ Φαρισαῖοι καὶ Σαδδουκαῖοι' (the Pharisees and Sadducees) uses a single article to group both factions together as a unified testing force.
- v2: (b) Assonance/Repetition: 'πυρράζει' (is red/fiery) is introduced here to set up the parallelism with the next verse.
- v3: (b) Wordplay/Repetition: 'πυρράζει' is repeated; (c) Definite article/demonstrative contrast: 'τὸ μὲν πρόσωπον τοῦ οὐρανοῦ' (the face of the sky) versus 'τὰ δὲ σημεῖα τῶν καιρῶν' (the signs of the times).
- v4: (f) Repetition: The word 'σημεῖον' (sign) is repeated three times in this single verse to emphasize the rebuke.
- v5: (f) Repetition: 'ἄρτους' (breads/loaves) introduces a key repeated motif for the upcoming dialogue.
- v6: (a) Cognate/Synonym pairing: 'ὁρᾶτε καὶ προσέχετε' (see and beware); (f) Refrain: 'τῆς ζύμης τῶν Φαρισαίων καὶ Σαδδουκαίων' (the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees).
- v7: (f) Repetition: 'ἄρτους' (breads/loaves); (h) Particle: 'ὅτι' functioning causally or as recitative.
- v8: (a) Cognate relation: 'διαλογίζεσθε' (reason) echoes 'διελογίζοντο' from verse 7; (h) Interjection/Vocative: 'ὀλιγόπιστοι' (little-faiths).
- v9: (d) Number matching/Assonance: 'πέντε ἄρτους τῶν πεντακισχιλίων' (five loaves of the five-thousand).
- v10: (d) Number matching: 'ἑπτὰ ἄρτους τῶν τετρακισχιλίων' (seven loaves of the four-thousand).
- v11: (f) Refrain: The exact phrase 'τῆς ζύμης τῶν Φαρισαίων καὶ Σαδδουκαίων' is repeated from verse 6 as the resolution of the instruction.
- v12: (c) Article pattern/Contrast: 'τῆς ζύμης τῶν ἄρτων' (the leaven of the breads) contrasted symmetrically with 'τῆς διδαχῆς τῶν Φαρισαίων καὶ Σαδδουκαίων' (the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees).
- v13: (f) Repetition: 'τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου' (the Son of Man) appears as a key titular phrase.
- v14: (f) Repetition structure: 'οἱ μέν... ἄλλοι δέ... ἕτεροι δέ' (some... others... still others) sets up the varying opinions of men.
- v15: (d) Pronoun shift/emphasis: 'ὑμεῖς δὲ' (But YOU [plural]) shifts the focus emphatically from the crowds to the disciples.
- v16: (c) Definite article pattern: 'ὁ χριστὸς ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ζῶντος' (the Christ, the Son of the God, the living [one]) is highly articular; (g) Divine name: Theos (God) appears here.
- v17: (b) Idiom/Wordplay: 'σὰρξ καὶ αἷμα' (flesh and blood); (d) Pronoun shift: moves to the singular 'σοι' (to you); (c) Article pattern: 'ὁ πατήρ μου ὁ ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς' (my Father, the [one] in the heavens).
- v18: (b) Wordplay/Assonance: 'Πέτρος' (Petros/Peter) and 'πέτρᾳ' (petra/rock); (c) Definite article: 'τὴν ἐκκλησίαν' (the assembly/church).
- v19: (a) Cognate/Participle match: 'δήσῃς' (might bind) paired with periphrastic future perfect 'ἔσται δεδεμένον' (will be having-been-bound), and 'λύσῃς' (might loose) paired with 'ἔσται λελυμένον' (will be having-been-loosed); (e) Chiasm/Parallelism: bind earth -> bound heavens / loose earth -> loosed heavens.
- v20: (c) Definite article: 'ὁ χριστός' (the Christ).
- v21: (c) Article pattern: 'ἀπὸ τῶν πρεσβυτέρων καὶ ἀρχιερέων καὶ γραμματέων' uses a single definite article covering three distinct plural groups.
- v22: (h) Interjection: 'ἵλεώς σοι' (Mercy to you / God be gracious to you); (g) Divine name: Kyrios (Lord) appears here.
- v23: (f) Repetition/Contrast: 'τὰ τοῦ θεοῦ ἀλλὰ τὰ τῶν ἀνθρώπων' (the things of God but the things of men); (g) Divine name: Theos (God).
- v24: (c) Structural pattern: Three sequential aorist imperatives 'ἀπαρνησάσθω... ἀράτω... ἀκολουθείτω' (let him deny... take up... follow).
- v25: (e) Chiasm/Parallelism: save life -> lose it, lose life -> find it; (a) Cognate usage: 'ἀπολέσει' (will lose) and 'ἀπολέσῃ' (might lose).
- v26: (f) Repetition: 'ἄνθρωπος' (man) and 'ψυχὴν' (soul/life); (b) Parallelism: gaining the whole world vs forfeiting the soul.
- v27: (c) Article/Preposition pattern: 'ἐν τῇ δόξῃ τοῦ πατρὸς αὐτοῦ μετὰ τῶν ἀγγέλων αὐτοῦ' (in the glory of his Father with his angels); (f) Repetition: 'ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου' (the Son of Man).
- v28: (h) Interjection/Particle: 'Ἀμὴν' (Amen/Truly); (f) Repetition: 'τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου' (the Son of Man).
Passo 5Comparar as traduções, versículo por versículo
Cada diferença classificada: textual · lexical · gramatical · interpretativa · estilística (esta última apenas quando altera o sentido).
- grammaticalv1 Syntactic phrasing of the request — “asked him to show” (WEB, ASV) vs “to” (DARBY, DRC) vs “that he would shew” (KJV) vs “to to” (YLT) vs “show” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv1 Preposition choice for from heaven — “from” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the” (YLT) vs “out of” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv2 Syntactic handling of the time phrase and pronoun — “ye” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB, DRC) vs “having come” (YLT) vs “is come” (DARBY)
- lexicalv2 (vv 2, 3) Word choice for the celestial sphere — “sky” (WEB, KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “heaven” (ASV, YLT)
- lexicalv3 Word choice for the look of the sky — “face” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “appearance” (WEB)
- lexicalv4 Word choice and order for describing the generation — “A wicked” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “An evil” (WEB, ASV) vs “generation evil” (YLT)
- grammaticalv4 Verb phrasing for seeking — “generation seeketh after” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “seeks” (WEB, DARBY) vs “doth seek” (YLT) vs “for” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv4 Phrasing of the negative concerning the sign — “there shall no” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “a” (YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “will be” (WEB)
- grammaticalv4 Phrasing of the passive verb for giving the sign — “be given unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “shall not to” (YLT, DARBY) vs “to” (WEB) vs “been to” (WEBSTER) vs “shall not” (DRC)
- lexicalv4 (vv 4, 10) Conjunction choice — “but” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “except” (WEB, YLT) vs “save” (DARBY)
- lexicalv4 Word choice and phrasing for Jesus leaving — “and departed” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “went away” (DARBY, DRC) vs “he went away” (YLT)
- grammaticalv5 Tense and verb choice for arriving — “came” (WEB, ASV) vs “were come to” (KJV, DARBY) vs “having” (YLT) vs “had” (WEBSTER) vs “over” (DRC)
- lexicalv6 Translation of the command to be careful — “Take heed and beware” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Beware and” (YLT) vs “See” (DARBY)
- lexicalv6 (vv 6, 11, 12) Word choice for the fermenting agent — “leaven” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “yeast” (WEB)
- lexicalv7 Word choice for the disciples' internal discussion — “reasoned among” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “were reasoning in” (YLT) vs “thought within” (DRC)
- lexicalv7 Verb choice and tense for bringing bread — “have taken” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “took” (ASV, YLT) vs “brought” (WEB)
- lexicalv8 Verb choice and participle versus finite verb for Jesus' awareness — “perceiving it” (WEB, ASV) vs “perceived he” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “knowing it” (DARBY, DRC) vs “having known” (YLT)
- stylisticv9 Phrasing of the negative interrogative — “Do ye not” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Don’t you” (WEB) vs “you” (DRC)
- lexicalv9 Verb choice for comprehending and conjunction — “understand neither” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “nor” (YLT, DARBY) vs “perceive or” (WEB) vs “perceive” (ASV) vs “do you” (DRC)
- lexicalv9 (vv 9, 10) Preposition connecting the loaves and the people — “of the” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “for” (WEB) vs “among” (DRC)
- lexicalv9 Word choice for the type of baskets — “baskets ye” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB, DRC) vs “hand-baskets” (YLT, DARBY)
- grammaticalv11 Syntactic rendering of the indirect statement — “But” (WEB, ASV) vs “that ye should beware” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “I said to you” (DARBY, DRC) vs “to take heed” (YLT)
- lexicalv12 Preposition choice following beware — “of” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “against” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv12 Word choice for instruction — “doctrine” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “teaching” (WEB, ASV, YLT)
- lexicalv13 Transition conjunction — “Now” (WEB, ASV) vs “When” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “And” (YLT, DRC) vs “But” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv13 Tense and phrasing for Jesus' arrival — “came into” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “having come to” (YLT) vs “was come” (DARBY)
- lexicalv13 Word choice for the region — “parts” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “coasts” (KJV) vs “borders” (WEBSTER) vs “quarters” (DRC)
- lexicalv13 Spelling of the region and verb choice for asking — “Caesarea” (WEB) vs “Cesarea Philippi he asked” (KJV) vs “Cæsarea” (ASV) vs “Caesarea was asking” (YLT) vs “Caesarea-Philippi demanded of” (DARBY) vs “Phillippi” (WEBSTER) vs “and” (DRC)
- grammaticalv13 Case of the interrogative pronoun — “Who” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Whom” (KJV, DRC)
- lexicalv14 Name spellings and minor connectors — “Jeremiah” (WEB, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “Jeremias” (KJV, DRC) vs “Elijah and others Jeremiah” (YLT) vs “again” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv15 Verb tense and presence of explicit subject for saying — “He saith unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “to” (YLT, WEBSTER) vs “said to” (WEB) vs “says to” (DARBY) vs “Jesus to” (DRC)
- grammaticalv17 (vv 17, 26) Auxiliary verb choice — “hath” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “has” (WEB, DARBY) vs “did” (YLT)
- grammaticalv17 Phrasing of the direct object and recipient — “to” (DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “revealed it unto thee” (KJV, ASV) vs “this to you” (WEB) vs “reveal to” (YLT)
- grammaticalv17 Relative pronoun choice — “who” (WEB, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “which” (KJV)
- grammaticalv17 (vv 17, 19) Singular versus plural for heaven — “heaven” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the heavens” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv18 Phrasing of the verb for telling — “to” (WEBSTER, DRC) vs “tell you” (WEB) vs “say also unto thee” (KJV) vs “say” (ASV) vs “say to” (YLT) vs “I say” (DARBY)
- interpretivev18 Translation of the name Peter as a rock versus transliteration — “thou art Peter” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you are” (WEB) vs “a rock” (YLT)
- stylisticv18 (vv 18, 19) Preposition choice — “upon” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “on” (WEB, DARBY)
- lexicalv18 Word choice for the gathered body of believers — “church” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “assembly” (WEB, YLT, DARBY)
- stylisticv19 Pronoun phrasing — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto thee” (KJV, ASV) vs “to you” (WEB)
- grammaticalv19 Phrasing of the indefinite relative pronoun — “whatsoever thou shalt” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “whatever you” (WEB) vs “whatever mayest” (YLT) vs “mayest” (DARBY) vs “whatever” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv19 Verb tense for binding on earth and heaven — “shall be” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “will have been” (WEB) vs “having been” (YLT) vs “it” (DRC)
- grammaticalv19 Verb tense and phrasing for loosing on earth and heaven — “shall be loosed” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “will have been released” (WEB) vs “having been” (YLT) vs “it also” (DRC)
- lexicalv20 Word choice for instructing the disciples — “commanded the” (WEB) vs “his” (KJV) vs “the” (ASV) vs “charge” (YLT) vs “enjoined on” (DARBY) vs “charged” (WEBSTER) vs “commanded” (DRC)
- grammaticalv20 Verb choice and mood for speaking — “should tell” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “may say to” (YLT) vs “say to” (DARBY)
- lexicalv20 Word choice for no one — “man” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “one” (WEB, YLT, DRC)
- stylisticv21 Spelling and phrasing of showing — “to” (YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “show” (WEB, ASV) vs “shew unto” (KJV) vs “show to” (WEBSTER)
- stylisticv21 Preposition choice for going to Jerusalem — “to” (WEB, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “away to” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv21 Preposition for the source of suffering — “from” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “of” (KJV, ASV)
- lexicalv21 Phrasing of execution — “killed” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “put to death” (YLT, DRC)
- lexicalv22 Degree and phrasing of negation — “shall not” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “will never” (WEB) vs “never” (ASV) vs “in no wise” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv22 Preposition and verb phrasing — “unto thee” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “to” (YLT, WEBSTER) vs “done to you” (WEB)
- grammaticalv23 Syntactic handling of turning — “But he turned and” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “and having” (YLT) vs “turning round” (DARBY) vs “Who turning” (DRC)
- lexicalv23 Translation of setting the mind or savoring — “you are” (WEB) vs “for thou savourest” (KJV) vs “mindest” (ASV) vs “dost” (YLT) vs “thy mind is” (DARBY) vs “savorest” (WEBSTER) vs “because” (DRC)
- grammaticalv23 Syntactic phrasing of the objects of the mind — “the things” (ASV, YLT) vs “on the things” (WEB) vs “those that be” (KJV) vs “on the things are” (DARBY) vs “are” (WEBSTER) vs “the things are” (DRC)
- lexicalv24 Word choice for the volition to follow — “any man will” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “anyone desires to” (WEB) vs “would” (ASV) vs “one doth to” (YLT) vs “one desires to” (DARBY)
- lexicalv25 Word choice for the volition to save life — “whoever desires to” (WEB) vs “whosoever will” (KJV) vs “would” (ASV) vs “whoever may to” (YLT) vs “shall desire to” (DARBY) vs “whoever” (WEBSTER) vs “he that” (DRC)
- stylisticv25 Auxiliary verb choice — “shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “will” (WEB)
- grammaticalv25 Pronoun and conjunction phrasing — “whoever” (WEB, WEBSTER) vs “and whosoever will” (KJV) vs “shall” (ASV) vs “whoever may” (YLT) vs “but shall” (DARBY) vs “he that shall” (DRC)
- grammaticalv26 Verb tense and syntax for profiting — “is” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “will it profit” (WEB) vs “shall” (ASV) vs “does” (DARBY) vs “doth it profit” (DRC)
- lexicalv26 Word choice for losing or forfeiting the soul — “and lose” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “suffer the loss of” (DARBY, DRC) vs “forfeits” (WEB) vs “forfeit” (ASV) vs “but of” (YLT)
- interpretivev26 Translation of psyche as soul versus life — “soul” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “life” (WEB, ASV, YLT)
- grammaticalv27 Tense phrasing for the Son of Man's coming — “shall” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “will” (WEB, WEBSTER) vs “is about to” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv27 Word choice for actions — “works” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “deeds” (WEB, ASV) vs “work” (YLT) vs “doings” (DARBY)
- lexicalv28 Translation of Amen — “Verily” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “Most certainly” (WEB) vs “Amen” (DRC)
- lexicalv28 Verb phrasing for speaking — “say unto” (KJV, ASV, DARBY) vs “to” (YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “tell” (WEB)
- stylisticv28 Phrasing of the time conjunction — “till” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “until” (WEB) vs “at all until” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv28 Verb tense and mood for seeing — “see” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “may” (YLT) vs “shall have seen” (DARBY) vs “shall” (WEBSTER)
Passo 6Sintetizar — alegações atômicas, por família, não por número de assentos
Cada declaração é dividida nas menores alegações testáveis; cada perfil elegível é AFIRMA / NEGA / QUALIFICA / SILENCIA sobre cada uma.
O consenso
The vast majority of traditions agree that the 'rock' refers to Peter's orthodox confession of faith or Christ Himself, rather than establishing Peter's person or office as an exclusive monarchical foundation. It is broadly affirmed that Jesus' command to take up the cross requires the daily mortification of the flesh and ongoing sanctification, while some traditions emphasize that Peter's initial confession required sovereign, divine illumination impossible by natural human intellect. Despite agreement on the confession itself, Peter's specific role is fiercely disputed, with one tradition affirming that the promise of the 'rock' establishes a unique primacy of jurisdiction and a perpetual papal office, a claim the other traditions deny. Furthermore, the meaning of the 'keys of the kingdom' and the power to bind and loose remains heavily disputed, dividing groups over whether this authority establishes the sacramental power of the ordained priesthood to forgive sins, equips representative church officers to exercise discipline, belongs strictly to the local congregation for membership matters, or merely represents the declarative authority of Scripture.
Pancristão — APOIO em todas as famílias elegíveis
The 'rock' refers to Peter's orthodox confession of faith or Christ Himself, rather than establishing Peter's person or office as an exclusive monarchical foundation.
11 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 0 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre SUPPORTquem disse o quê (12)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“The Magisterium synthesizes these streams: the Church is built upon Peter the person precisely because of the enduring, objective reality of his orthodox confession (verse 16), which flesh and blood did not reveal (verse 17).” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The patristic consensus, prominently voiced by John Chrysostom, identifies the 'rock' (petra) not as the individual person of Peter (Petros), but as the orthodox confession of faith itself—the acknowledgment of Christ's divinity.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Cyril of Alexandria and the wider Oriental tradition insist that the 'rock' is not Peter's person, but the unshakeable, orthodox faith of his confession.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Reformers like John Jewel argued that the 'rock' upon which the Church is built is either Christ himself or Peter's confession of faith, not Peter's person as an absolute monarch.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, the 'rock' upon which the church is built is not Peter's person or an institutional office, but rather the confession of faith that Jesus is the Christ.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“In Reformed covenant theology, the 'rock' upon which the church is built is not Peter as an individual or a papal monarch, but rather the truth of Peter's confession—Christ himself.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Rejecting readings that establish a papal or episcopal hierarchy, Baptists historically argue that the 'rock' (v. 18) refers to the substance of Peter's confession or to Christ Himself as the foundation.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“In his Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament, John Wesley interpreted the rock in verse 18 as either Christ himself or Peter's confession, firmly rejecting papal supremacy, and understood the keys as the authority to preach the gospel and exercise church discipline.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“Believers are called to reject the 'leaven' of worldly religious and political power (v. 6), trusting that the church built upon the confession of Christ (v. 16-18) will endure against the gates of Hades precisely through its faithful, nonviolent witness.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The declaration to build the church upon the 'rock' (v. 18) is generally interpreted by Pentecostal scholars like Stanley M. Horton as pointing to the divine revelation of Jesus Himself as the Christ, rather than the person of Peter.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Adventists hold that the church is built solely upon Christ, the 'Son of the living God.'” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Commentators such as J.W. McGarvey stress two points here: first, the 'rock' is not Peter, but the truth Peter confessed; second, the future tense ('I will build') demonstrates that the church did not yet exist in the Old Testament or during John the Baptist's life, but was to be established later at Pentecost.”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
Amplo — APOIO em todas as famílias, exceto uma, sendo esta indeterminada
The command to take up the cross requires the daily mortification of the flesh and ongoing sanctification.
7 afirmam · 0 negam · 1 qualificam · 4 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (8)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Finally, verses 24-25 heavily inform Catholic asceticism; 'taking up the cross' is applied to the daily sacrifices of the Christian life, the vows of religious life, and the endurance of martyrdom, uniting the believer's sufferings to the paschal mystery Christ predicts in verse 21.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The call to 'take up his cross' (verse 24) is heavily emphasized in Orthodox spirituality as the daily 'podvig' (spiritual struggle) required to purify the heart of passions and progress toward theosis.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“It animates the extensive monastic movements of Egypt, Syria, Armenia, and Ethiopia, where ascetics take up the 'cross' of lifelong self-denial.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, the command to 'take up his cross' (verse 24) profoundly shapes Anglican baptismal theology—where the newly baptized is signed with the cross—and informs the ascetical practices of self-denial emphasized during Lent and in the daily rhythm of the Christian life.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“In daily piety, verses 24-25 are applied as a call to vocational cross-bearing, wherein Christians expect suffering and the mortification of the flesh rather than worldly success, trusting that in losing their lives for Christ's sake, they find true life in the gospel.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, it calls the Christian to practice daily mortification of the flesh ('deny himself') and joyful submission to providential hardships ('take up his cross'), trusting that losing one's life for Christ's sake is the only path to true life.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Methodists apply Jesus's command to deny oneself and take up the cross in verse 24 as the non-negotiable daily practice of Christian perfection. It is not viewed merely as a call to initial conversion, but as the enduring mechanism for mortifying the flesh and removing the inward leaven of sin.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · QUALIFY
“Taking up the cross (v. 24) is not spiritualized as general human hardship but is understood as the literal persecution expected for following Christ's nonviolent teachings.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Específico de tradição — apenas uma tradição
Jesus' refusal to provide a sign to the Pharisees is a rebuke of skeptical unbelief rather than a blanket denial that miraculous signs accompany faith.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The Pharisees' demand for a sign (vv. 1-4) is viewed not as a blanket prohibition against miraculous signs—which Pentecostals expect to accompany the preaching of the gospel—but as a rebuke of skeptical, unbelieving demands that refuse to submit to God.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
The 'sign of Jonah' typifies Christ's death, descent into Hades, and resurrection.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The sign of Jonah is a direct type of Christ's descent into Sheol and resurrection on the third day.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
The 'sign of Jonah' is commemorated liturgically through a three-day fast of repentance.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The typological 'sign of Jonah' (16:4) is physically commemorated in the Fast of Nineveh (Jonah's Fast), a strict three-day fast observed by the Syriac, Coptic, and Ethiopian churches a few weeks before Great Lent, preparing the faithful for the paschal mystery through repentance.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
Peter's confession affirms the indivisible unity of Christ as one incarnate nature, being simultaneously Son of Man and Son of God.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Because Jesus asks about the 'Son of Man' (16:13) and Peter confesses the 'Son of the living God' (16:16), Severus of Antioch and others emphasize that the same subject is simultaneously human and divine, affirming the one incarnate nature of God the Word without separation.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
Peter's divinely revealed confession serves as the necessary paradigm for regenerate church membership, requiring personal spiritual illumination.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Baptist · AFFIRM
“The blessing upon Peter for receiving direct, internal revelation from the Father (v. 17) is viewed as the paradigm for all believers, anchoring the Baptist insistence on a regenerate church composed only of those who have personally experienced divine illumination and conversion.”
- Baptist · AFFIRM
Peter's confession constitutes the singular foundational creed required for Christian unity and baptism, replacing human theological systems.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Early movement leaders like Alexander Campbell argued that this singular confession of faith—rather than complex human creeds—was the only legitimate and necessary basis for Christian fellowship and church membership.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
Every believer who makes the true confession of faith spiritually becomes a 'rock' within the Church.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Origen extends this by teaching that every believer who authentically makes this confession becomes a 'rock' and a 'Peter' within the Church.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
The future tense 'I will build' indicates that the church was a future institution at the time of Christ's earthly ministry, established later at Pentecost.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Commentators such as J.W. McGarvey stress two points here: first, the 'rock' is not Peter, but the truth Peter confessed; second, the future tense ('I will build') demonstrates that the church did not yet exist in the Old Testament or during John the Baptist's life, but was to be established later at Pentecost.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
Christ's possessive phrasing 'my church' dictates the scriptural name and non-denominational nature of the true church.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“The phrase 'my church' (verse 18) is frequently invoked in preaching to defend the use of the designation 'Church of Christ' (alongside Romans 16:16), pointing to Christ's exclusive ownership and ownership as a mark of the true New Testament pattern over denominational names.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
The authority to bind and loose authorizes believers to engage in intercessory prayer and spiritual warfare against demonic forces.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The language of 'binding and loosing' (v. 19) is a standard feature of Pentecostal intercessory prayer. Believers actively 'bind' demonic influences, sickness, and spiritual opposition, and 'loose' healing, deliverance, and the power of the Holy Spirit.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
Peter's rejection of Christ's impending suffering typifies the false 'theology of glory' that opposes the 'theology of the cross'.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“The tradition identifies Peter’s attempt to steer Jesus away from suffering (16:22) as the ultimate expression of the 'theology of glory'—humanity's fallen desire to find God in power, triumph, and fleshly reasoning rather than in suffering and sacrifice.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
The transition from Peter's confession to his rebuke demonstrates the danger of spiritual pride and the possibility of falling from grace.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, Wesley viewed the sharp transition from Peter's divine revelation in verse 17 to his satanic stumbling block in verse 23 as a warning against spiritual pride and the false security that previous grace guarantees future faithfulness.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
Peter's rebuke of Jesus was a direct temptation orchestrated by Satan to prevent the atonement.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“White asserts that Satan actively used Peter's misplaced affection to tempt Jesus away from the cross.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
Jesus' rebuke of Peter represents a definitive rejection of worldly, coercive political power in favor of a suffering path.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, Jesus' rebuke of Peter (v. 23) is read as a definitive rejection of political, coercive messiahship.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
Taking up the cross involves the specific sacrifices necessary for adhering to distinctive biblical truths, such as the seventh-day Sabbath.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The call to 'take up his cross' (verse 24) is often applied to the real-world sacrifices required by fidelity to distinctive biblical truths—such as keeping the seventh-day Sabbath—which can invite economic loss or social alienation.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
Self-denial and taking up the cross are essential prerequisites for operating in the supernatural power of the Holy Spirit.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Additionally, the call to take up the cross and deny oneself (vv. 24-25) is preached as the essential prerequisite for operating in the Spirit's power.”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
The term for 'soul' or 'life' in verse 26 refers to the whole person's mortal existence, which can be permanently destroyed, rather than a naturally immortal entity.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Adventists maintain that the Greek word 'psuche' here does not refer to a naturally immortal entity that survives the body, but to the holistic life or existence of a person, which can be permanently destroyed if not secured in Christ.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
The Son of Man's future judgment based on works establishes the doctrine of final justification by works.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Against deterministic soteriologies, early Methodists like John Fletcher highlighted verse 27 as a key prooftext for final justification by works, demonstrating that while initial salvation is by faith alone, the final judgment evaluates the believer's subsequent fruits.”
- Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
The distribution of rewards at the Second Coming implies the necessity of a pre-Advent investigative judgment.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The 'Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary' points out that because Christ brings His rewards with Him at the Second Advent, a judgment must necessarily take place beforehand to determine what those rewards will be, indirectly supporting the doctrine of the pre-Advent (or investigative) judgment occurring in the heavenly sanctuary.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
The promise that some would not taste death before seeing the kingdom proves that the kingdom was historically established in the first century.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 11 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (1)
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Verse 28 proves that the kingdom was established during the lifetime of the apostles, explicitly refuting Premillennial claims of a postponed earthly kingdom.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
Mencionado entre as famílias — afirmado em alguma parte de cada família, sem maioria — não é consenso
Peter's confession requires sovereign, divine illumination and is impossible by natural human intellect.
5 afirmam · 0 negam · 0 qualificam · 7 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (5)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The Magisterium synthesizes these streams: the Church is built upon Peter the person precisely because of the enduring, objective reality of his orthodox confession (verse 16), which flesh and blood did not reveal (verse 17).” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Justification by faith alone is seen as implicitly affirmed when Jesus declares that Peter's confession relies entirely on divine revelation, not 'flesh and blood' (16:17).” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Verse 17 is heavily emphasized as a proof of sovereign grace and total depravity; Calvin argues that Peter's confession relies entirely on divine illumination, as 'flesh and blood' is fundamentally blind to spiritual truth.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Jesus blesses Peter, noting that this knowledge came by divine revelation (v. 17).” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Peter's confession (vv. 16-17) is received as the paradigm for spiritual epistemology: knowing Jesus truly as the Christ requires direct, supernatural revelation from the Father, bypassing mere 'flesh and blood' intellect.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Em disputa — uma família é mista, ou famílias afirmam vs. negam
The promise of the 'rock' establishes a unique primacy of jurisdiction for Peter and a perpetual papal office.
1 afirmam · 11 negam · 0 qualificam · 0 silenciamAntiga MIXEDReforma OPPOSEIgreja Livre OPPOSEquem disse o quê (12)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The First Vatican Council (*Pastor Aeternus*) infallibly defined that verses 18-19 confer upon Peter a primacy of true and proper jurisdiction over the whole Church.” - Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“The tradition maintains that this authority was given to Peter as a prefigurement, but was bestowed equally upon all the apostles (as seen in Matthew 18 and the Gospel of John), and thus resides collegially in all bishops who maintain the orthodox faith, rather than exclusively in the Bishop of Rome.” - Oriental Orthodox · DENY
“The declaration 'upon this rock I will build my church' (16:18) is definitively interpreted apart from Roman papal claims.” - Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
“The 'rock' refers to Christ or Peter's confession of faith, and the keys are given to all ministers for preaching and reconciliation, denying exclusive papal supremacy.” - Lutheran · DENY
“Furthermore, the 'rock' upon which the church is built is not Peter's person or an institutional office, but rather the confession of faith that Jesus is the Christ.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“In Reformed covenant theology, the 'rock' upon which the church is built is not Peter as an individual or a papal monarch, but rather the truth of Peter's confession—Christ himself.” - Baptist · DENY
“Rejecting readings that establish a papal or episcopal hierarchy, Baptists historically argue that the 'rock' (v. 18) refers to the substance of Peter's confession or to Christ Himself as the foundation.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · DENY
“In his Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament, John Wesley interpreted the rock in verse 18 as either Christ himself or Peter's confession, firmly rejecting papal supremacy, and understood the keys as the authority to preach the gospel and exercise church discipline.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · DENY
“Rather than viewing the keys as establishing a clerical or papal hierarchy, early Anabaptist leaders like Balthasar Hubmaier, in 'On the Christian Ban', argued that the authority to bind and loose belongs to the visible, local congregation of baptized believers.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · DENY
“The declaration to build the church upon the 'rock' (v. 18) is generally interpreted by Pentecostal scholars like Stanley M. Horton as pointing to the divine revelation of Jesus Himself as the Christ, rather than the person of Peter.” - Seventh-day Adventist · DENY
“Verses 18–19 are foundational to Adventist ecclesiology, read in direct opposition to papal claims of primacy.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“Commentators such as J.W. McGarvey stress two points here: first, the 'rock' is not Peter, but the truth Peter confessed; second, the future tense ('I will build') demonstrates that the church did not yet exist in the Old Testament or during John the Baptist's life, but was to be established later at Pentecost.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The 'keys of the kingdom' and the authority to bind and loose establish the sacramental power of the ordained priesthood to forgive sins.
4 afirmam · 5 negam · 1 qualificam · 2 silenciamAntiga SUPPORTReforma MIXEDIgreja Livre OPPOSEquem disse o quê (10)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“The power of the keys and binding/loosing (verse 19) is applied practically in the Sacrament of Reconciliation, where priests, participating in apostolic authority, pronounce absolution of sins.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, the phrasing of 'binding and loosing' (verse 19) is integrated into the prayers of absolution within the sacrament of Confession, particularly in the Slavic tradition, affirming the priest's delegated authority to forgive sins.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The 'keys of the kingdom' (16:19) represent the authority of the priesthood to bind and loose sins, an authority shared by all the apostles and their successors who hold to the orthodox faith.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“It also historically undergirds the Ordinal's conferring of authority upon priests to remit and retain sins.” - Lutheran · QUALIFY
“The power to 'bind and loose' (16:19) is practically exercised by called ministers acting on behalf of the congregation.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“Opening and shutting the kingdom is achieved not by a singular vicar, but by ministers declaring God's forgiveness to the penitent and elders applying censures to the impenitent.” - Baptist · DENY
“Furthermore, Baptists democratize the 'keys of the kingdom' and the authority to bind and loose (v. 19). While spoken to Peter here, this authority is understood across the tradition to belong to the local, gathered congregation.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · DENY
“Rather than viewing the keys as establishing a clerical or papal hierarchy, early Anabaptist leaders like Balthasar Hubmaier, in 'On the Christian Ban', argued that the authority to bind and loose belongs to the visible, local congregation of baptized believers.” - Seventh-day Adventist · DENY
“Ellen G. White emphasizes in 'The Desire of Ages' that the 'keys of the kingdom' do not represent ecclesiastical authority vested in a human hierarchy to forgive sins, but rather the words of Christ—the Holy Scriptures—which bind and loose by declaring the divine terms of salvation.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“The 'keys of the kingdom' (verse 19) are understood to have been used by Peter on the Day of Pentecost to unlock the gospel to the Jews, and later to the Gentiles at Cornelius's house, linking this chapter inextricably to the plan of salvation taught in Acts.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The 'keys of the kingdom' confer authority upon representative church officers to administer the gospel and exercise church discipline.
4 afirmam · 2 negam · 0 qualificam · 6 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma SUPPORTIgreja Livre MIXEDquem disse o quê (6)
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Richard Hooker situated the power of 'binding and loosing' within the Church's broader ministry of spiritual discipline, jurisdiction, and the pronouncing of absolution.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“The power to 'bind and loose' (16:19) is practically exercised by called ministers acting on behalf of the congregation.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“The Westminster Confession of Faith and the Heidelberg Catechism identify these keys as the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of church discipline by appointed officers.” - Baptist · DENY
“While spoken to Peter here, this authority is understood across the tradition to belong to the local, gathered congregation.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“In his Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament, John Wesley interpreted the rock in verse 18 as either Christ himself or Peter's confession, firmly rejecting papal supremacy, and understood the keys as the authority to preach the gospel and exercise church discipline.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · DENY
“Rather than viewing the keys as establishing a clerical or papal hierarchy, early Anabaptist leaders like Balthasar Hubmaier, in 'On the Christian Ban', argued that the authority to bind and loose belongs to the visible, local congregation of baptized believers.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
The 'keys of the kingdom' and the power of binding and loosing belong to the local congregation for the purposes of membership and discipline.
2 afirmam · 4 negam · 1 qualificam · 5 silenciamAntiga OPPOSEReforma LEANING-CONTESTEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (7)
- Catholic · DENY
“The First Vatican Council (*Pastor Aeternus*) infallibly defined that verses 18-19 confer upon Peter a primacy of true and proper jurisdiction over the whole Church.” - Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“The authority to 'bind and loose' (verse 19) is understood as the grace of the priesthood and the sacramental authority of the episcopate.” - Oriental Orthodox · DENY
“The 'keys of the kingdom' (16:19) represent the authority of the priesthood to bind and loose sins, an authority shared by all the apostles and their successors who hold to the orthodox faith.” - Lutheran · QUALIFY
“The power to 'bind and loose' (16:19) is practically exercised by called ministers acting on behalf of the congregation.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“The Westminster Confession of Faith and the Heidelberg Catechism identify these keys as the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of church discipline by appointed officers.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“John L. Dagg, in his 'Manual of Church Order', articulates that the local church exercises these keys when it admits members upon a credible profession of faith or excludes them through church discipline, effectively binding and loosing on earth what aligns with the gospel from heaven.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The keys of the kingdom (v. 19) grant the local congregation, rather than a clerical hierarchy, the authority to exercise church discipline and communal discernment.”
- Catholic · DENY
The 'keys of the kingdom' represent the declarative authority of Scripture rather than human ecclesiastical power.
1 afirmam · 5 negam · 1 qualificam · 5 silenciamAntiga OPPOSEReforma OPPOSEIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (7)
- Catholic · DENY
“Furthermore, the authority to 'bind and loose' (verse 19) is received as the juridical and doctrinal authority to govern the Church, teach infallibly, and explicitly, to absolve sins—a power the Council of Trent (*Decree on the Sacrament of Penance*) formally rooted in this passage.” - Eastern Orthodox · DENY
“The authority to 'bind and loose' (verse 19) is understood as the grace of the priesthood and the sacramental authority of the episcopate.” - Oriental Orthodox · DENY
“The 'keys of the kingdom' (16:19) represent the authority of the priesthood to bind and loose sins, an authority shared by all the apostles and their successors who hold to the orthodox faith.” - Anglican / Episcopal · DENY
“Richard Hooker situated the power of 'binding and loosing' within the Church's broader ministry of spiritual discipline, jurisdiction, and the pronouncing of absolution.” - Lutheran · DENY
“Martin Luther's 'Small Catechism' instructs believers that this is the peculiar church power given by Christ to forgive the sins of penitent sinners (loosing) and to withhold forgiveness from the unrepentant as long as they do not repent (binding), which is as valid and certain in heaven as if Christ dealt with them Himself.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · QUALIFY
“The 'keys of the kingdom' and the power to bind and loose (v. 19) are understood to establish the spiritual government of the church.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Ellen G. White emphasizes in 'The Desire of Ages' that the 'keys of the kingdom' do not represent ecclesiastical authority vested in a human hierarchy to forgive sins, but rather the words of Christ—the Holy Scriptures—which bind and loose by declaring the divine terms of salvation.”
- Catholic · DENY
Taking up the cross entails a commitment to literal martyrdom and nonresistance against worldly power.
1 afirmam · 0 negam · 2 qualificam · 9 silenciamAntiga LEANING-CONTESTEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre UNDETERMINEDquem disse o quê (3)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“Finally, verses 24-25 heavily inform Catholic asceticism; 'taking up the cross' is applied to the daily sacrifices of the Christian life, the vows of religious life, and the endurance of martyrdom, uniting the believer's sufferings to the paschal mystery Christ predicts in verse 21.” - Oriental Orthodox · QUALIFY
“It is also deeply felt in the continuing legacy of martyrdom across these communions, where believers literally forfeit their earthly lives (16:25) for Christ's sake, trusting they will find true life in the resurrection.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“Taking up the cross (v. 24) is not spiritualized as general human hardship but is understood as the literal persecution expected for following Christ's nonviolent teachings.”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
The promise that some would not taste death before seeing the kingdom refers to the revelation of uncreated light at the Transfiguration.
1 afirmam · 1 negam · 0 qualificam · 10 silenciamAntiga UNDETERMINEDReforma UNDETERMINEDIgreja Livre LEANING-CONTESTEDquem disse o quê (2)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The promise that some would not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom refers to the uncreated light witnessed at the Transfiguration.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“Theologians and debaters like Foy E. Wallace Jr. utilized this verse extensively to refute Premillennialism, insisting that the kingdom is synonymous with the church and was established with power in the first century, rather than being postponed due to Jewish rejection.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
Passo 7Renderizar a New Consensus Bible
A partir do texto no idioma original. As tradições documentam a recepção; elas não votam na formulação. Toda formulação contestada que a tradução resolveu está listada abaixo, não oculta.
1And the Pharisees and Sadducees came to him, and testing him, they asked him to show them a sign from heaven. 2But he answered and said to them, "When evening comes, you say, 'It will be fair weather, for the sky is red.' 3And in the morning, 'It will be stormy today, for the sky is red and threatening.' Hypocrites! You know how to discern the face of the sky, but you cannot discern the signs of the times! 4An evil and adulterous generation seeks a sign, and no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah." And leaving them, he departed. 5And when his disciples came to the other side, they had forgotten to take loaves. 6And Jesus said to them, "See and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." 7And they reasoned among themselves, saying, "It is because we took no loaves." 8But Jesus, knowing this, said to them, "Why do you reason among yourselves, you of little faith, because you have no loaves? 9Do you not yet understand, nor remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets you took up? 10Nor the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets you took up? 11How is it that you do not understand that I did not speak to you concerning loaves? But beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." 12Then they understood that he did not tell them to beware of the leaven of the loaves, but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees. 13Now when Jesus came into the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, "Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?" 14And they said, "Some say John the Baptist; and others, Elijah; and others, Jeremiah, or one of the prophets." 15He says to them, "But you, who do you say that I am?" 16Simon Peter answered and said, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." 17And Jesus answered and said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. 18And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my assembly, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. 19I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will have been loosed in heaven." 20Then he commanded his disciples that they should tell no one that he was Jesus the Christ. 21From that time Jesus Christ began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and on the third day be raised. 22And Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him, saying, "Mercy to you, Lord! This will never happen to you." 23But turning, he said to Peter, "Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me, for you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of men." 24Then Jesus said to his disciples, "If anyone wishes to come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. 25For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it, but whoever might lose his life for my sake will find it. 26For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, but forfeits his life? Or what will a man give in exchange for his life? 27For the Son of Man is about to come in the glory of his Father with his angels, and then he will reward each according to his deeds. 28Truly I say to you, there are some standing here who will by no means taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom."
Escolhas feitas — cada disputa que a tradução resolveu
| Versículo | Fonte | Opções | Escolha | Motivo | Cat. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | οἱ Φαρισαῖοι καὶ Σαδδουκαῖοι | (T) the Pharisees also with the Sadducees, the Pharisees and Sadducees, (S) the Pharisees and Sadducees | the Pharisees and Sadducees | Preserves the single definite article uniting the two groups. | grammatical |
| v1 | ἐπιδεῖξαι αὐτοῖς | (T) desired him that he would shew them, asked him to show them, did question him to shew to them, (S) asked him to show them | asked him to show them | Contemporary English syntax for the infinitive complement. | grammatical |
| v2 | ὀψίας γενομένης | (T) When it is evening, Evening having come, When evening is come, (S) When evening comes | When evening comes | Natural rendering of the genitive absolute. | grammatical |
| v3 | τὸ μὲν πρόσωπον τοῦ οὐρανοῦ | (T) the face of the sky, the face of the heavens, the appearance of the sky, (S) the face of the sky | the face of the sky | Preserves the literal prosōpon to maintain the structural contrast. | lexical |
| v3 | verses 2-3 omission | (T) Include verses 2-3, (A) Exclude verses 2-3 as later interpolation | Include verses 2-3 | Follows the provided source-language text despite critical academic omission. | textual |
| v4 | σημεῖον οὐ δοθήσεται αὐτῇ | (T) there shall no sign be given unto it, a sign shall not be given to it, (S) no sign will be given to it | no sign will be given to it | Clear contemporary passive formulation of the third repetition of sign. | grammatical |
| v4 | καταλιπὼν αὐτοὺς | (T) he left them, having left them, (S) leaving them | leaving them | Resolves the aorist participle into a contemporary English active participle. | grammatical |
| v5 | ἄρτους | (T) bread, loaves | loaves | Translates the plural noun literally to establish the ongoing motif. | lexical |
| v6 | ὁρᾶτε καὶ προσέχετε | (T) Take heed and beware, Beware and take heed, See and beware, (S) See and beware | See and beware | Directly matches the two distinct imperatives horaō and prosechō. | lexical |
| v6 | ζύμης | (T) leaven, yeast | leaven | Matches the broader theological metaphor better than literal yeast. | lexical |
| v7 | ὅτι | (T) We took no loaves, It is because we have taken no bread, Because we took no loaves, (S) It is because we took no loaves | It is because we took no loaves | Treats hoti as causal based on the context of their misunderstanding. | grammatical |
| v8 | ὀλιγόπιστοι | (T) O ye of little faith, ye of little faith, you of little faith, (S) you of little faith | you of little faith | Standard rendering of the vocative adjective oligopistoi. | stylistic |
| v11 | οὐ περὶ ἄρτων εἶπον ὑμῖν | (T) I did not speak to you concerning bread, I spake it not to you concerning bread, (S) that I did not speak to you concerning loaves | that I did not speak to you concerning loaves | Literal rendering of the indirect statement retaining the plural loaves. | grammatical |
| v12 | τῆς ζύμης τῶν ἄρτων | (T) the leaven of bread, the leaven of the bread, (S) the leaven of the loaves | the leaven of the loaves | Preserves the plural and the definite article pattern contrasting with teaching. | grammatical |
| v13 | τίνα με λέγουσιν οἱ ἄνθρωποι εἶναι τὸν υἱὸν τοῦ ἀνθρώπου | (T) Who do men say that the Son of man is, Who do men say that I the Son of man am, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am, (S) Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am | Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am | Includes the accusative pronoun 'me' present in the source text. | textual |
| v15 | ὑμεῖς δὲ τίνα με λέγετε εἶναι | (T) But whom say ye that I am, And ye--who do ye say me to be, But who do you say that I am, (S) But you, who do you say that I am | But you, who do you say that I am | Emphasizes the fronted pronoun hymeis in the Greek syntax. | grammatical |
| v16 | θεοῦ | (T) God, (S) God | God | Capitalization of the divine name Theos. | interpretive |
| v17 | σὰρξ καὶ αἷμα οὐκ ἀπεκάλυψέν σοι | (T) flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, flesh and blood has not revealed it to thee, (A) sovereign divine illumination | flesh and blood has not revealed this to you | Uses the modern auxiliary 'has', supplies 'this' for the implied object, and affirms some traditions' emphasis on sovereign divine illumination against natural intellect. | interpretive |
| v18 | σὺ εἶ Πέτρος καὶ ἐπὶ ταύτῃ τῇ πέτρᾳ οἰκοδομήσω | (T) thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build, you are Peter and on this rock I will build, thou art a rock and upon this rock I will build, (A) historical origins and original historical reception within the Matthean community | you are Peter, and on this rock I will build | Retains transliteration to reflect the Greek wordplay; a broad reception sees the rock as Peter's confession, while it remains disputed among traditions if this establishes a unique papal primacy. | interpretive |
| v19 | ὃ ἐὰν δήσῃς ... ἔσται δεδεμένον | (T) whatsoever thou shalt bind ... shall be bound, whatever you bind ... will have been bound, (A) rabbinic halakhic terminology of forbidding and permitting | whatever you bind ... will have been bound | Precisely renders the periphrastic future perfects; the meaning of the keys is disputed among traditions over sacramental priesthood, representative officers, local congregation, or declarative authority. | interpretive |
| v21 | Ἰησοῦς Χριστὸς | (T) Jesus, (S) Jesus Christ | Jesus Christ | Reflects the full name as written in the provided Greek text. | textual |
| v21 | ἀπὸ τῶν πρεσβυτέρων καὶ ἀρχιερέων καὶ γραμματέων | (T) of the elders and chief priests and scribes, from the elders, and chief priests, and scribes, (S) from the elders and chief priests and scribes | from the elders and chief priests and scribes | Preserves the single article covering the three distinct groups. | grammatical |
| v22 | ἵλεώς σοι | (T) Far be it from you, Be it far from thee, Be kind to thyself, God be favourable to thee, (S) Mercy to you | Mercy to you | Direct literal rendering of the interjection idiom hileōs soi. | lexical |
| v22 | κύριε | (T) Lord, (S) Lord | Lord | Capitalization of the divine title Kyrios. | interpretive |
| v23 | τὰ τοῦ θεοῦ | (T) the things of God, (S) the things of God | God | Capitalization of the divine name Theos. | interpretive |
| v24 | ἀπαρνησάσθω ... ἀράτω ... ἀκολουθείτω | (T) let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me, let him deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me, (A) daily mortification of the flesh | let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me | Preserves the chain of imperatives; a broad reception affirms daily mortification, while it is disputed among traditions if it entails literal martyrdom and nonresistance. | interpretive |
| v25 | ἀπολέσει ... ἀπολέσῃ | (T) shall lose ... shall lose, will lose ... will lose, shall lose ... may lose, (S) will lose ... might lose | will lose ... might lose | Differentiates between the future indicative apolesei and the aorist subjunctive apolesē. | grammatical |
| v26 | ψυχὴν | (T) soul, life | life | Preserves the same translation of psuchē from verse 25 to maintain the internal logic and wordplay. | lexical |
| v27 | μέλλει ... ἔρχεσθαι | (T) shall come, will come, is about to come | is about to come | Precise rendering of the imminent phrasing mellei erchesthai. | grammatical |
| v28 | Ἀμὴν | (T) Verily, Most certainly, Amen, (S) Truly | Truly | Standard modern equivalent for the particle Amēn. | lexical |
| v28 | οὐ μὴ γεύσωνται θανάτου | (T) shall not taste of death, will in no way taste of death, shall in no wise taste of death, (S) will by no means taste death | will by no means taste death | Contemporary phrasing for the emphatic negative; it is disputed among traditions if this promise refers to the revelation of uncreated light at the Transfiguration. | interpretive |
Limites que vale a pena conhecer
- This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
- The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
- The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
- The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
- One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
- The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
- Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
- The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.