← Bumalik sa Mateo 7 · Buong pahina ng pag-aaral ng Mateo 7
Paano nabuo ang konsensus para sa Mateo 7
Bawat hakbang ng proseso, eksakto kung paano ito tumakbo. Walang in-edit nang mano-mano rito: ang mga pagsasalin ay galing sa database ng app na ito, ang pagbasa ng bawat tradisyon ay na-generate sa mga isolated call na hindi nakikita ang isa't isa (pinipigilan ng isolation ang anchoring; hindi nito ginagawa ang mga ito na mga independent na saksi), at ang konsensus ay na-synthesize mula lamang sa mga pagbasang iyon.
- Model:
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview (high thinking) — every stage, v4 spec + Addendum B (claim-audited, cross-stage-checked)
- Na-generate:
- Oct 12, 2026, 1:37 AM UTC
- Method:
- claim-audited, source-language-based, family-weighted
Hakbang 1Basahin ang bahagi sa bawat public-domain na pagsasalin
7 translations, fed to every step. The AI-generated NCB is never a source.
WEB · World English Bible
KJV · King James Version
ASV · American Standard Version
YLT · Young's Literal Translation
Darby · Darby Translation
Webster · Webster Bible
DRC · Douay-Rheims (Challoner)
Hakbang 2Each eligible tradition reads the chapter — 12 voting profiles across 3 families
Mga naka-isolate na profile na binuo ng AI na hindi nakikita ang isa't isa. Nakakaalam sa genre, at tapat tungkol sa limitadong materyal.
Ancient Communions · The undivided-church and pre-Reformation episcopal traditions.
Catholicaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Roman Catholic tradition drawing on both Latin AND Eastern Catholic sources — and actually showing the Eastern dimension, not merely promising it: Scripture within Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium (the Catechism, the Latin Fathers, Augustine, Aquinas and the scholastics, the councils) together with the Eastern Catholic churches in communion with Rome and the Greek and Syriac Fathers they share. Sacramental and typological reading. Distinguish teaching shared across the whole Catholic communion from emphases specific to the Latin or to the Eastern Catholic churches.
Kagyat na kahulugan — In its immediate narrative context, Matthew 7 brings the Sermon on the Mount to its conclusion. Jesus delivers a series of eschatological warnings and ethical imperatives, moving from prohibitions against hypocritical judgment and the profanation of holy things, to encouragements for persistent prayer and the Golden Rule. The discourse culminates in a series of stark, binary choices: the narrow and wide gates, good and corrupt trees, true and false disciples, and the wise and foolish builders. The chapter ends with the narrative frame of the crowds being astonished, contrasting Christ's direct, inherent authority with the derivative teaching of the scribes.
Reception — The Catholic communion reads this chapter as a cornerstone for moral theology, sacramental discipline, and the doctrine of justification. Both Latin and Eastern Catholic traditions have historically interpreted the command to not give what is holy to dogs (v. 6) as an injunction protecting the sacraments; the Didache explicitly applied this to restricting the Eucharist to the baptized, a reading maintained in the Eastern liturgies' guarding of the mysteries. On justification, the Council of Trent drew heavily on Christ's warning that saying 'Lord, Lord' is insufficient without doing the Father's will (v. 21) to repudiate justification by faith alone, insisting that saving faith must be formed by charity and obedience. Regarding judgment (v. 1-5), Augustine and the Latin moral tradition distinguish between forbidden rash judgment of inner motives and obligatory fraternal correction. Furthermore, Eastern Fathers like John Chrysostom emphasize the narrow gate (v. 13-14) as the biblical mandate for rigorous asceticism and the monastic struggle, reading the 'fruits' of the false prophets (v. 15-20) as primarily moral and ascetical failures rather than merely doctrinal errors. The house built on the rock (v. 24-27) is widely received typologically as the Church built upon Christ's teachings, which withstands the floods of heresy and persecution.
Application — In practical application, this chapter grounds the Catholic Church's closed communion, ensuring the Eucharist is received only by those in full communion and a state of grace. It shapes ascetical practice, calling the faithful to embrace the 'narrow way' of fasting, prayer, and almsgiving rather than the broad way of secular culture. The verses on persistent prayer (v. 7-11) are utilized extensively in both Latin novenas and Eastern hesychastic spirituality to encourage unceasing reliance on the Father. Liturgically, these texts are read in the Ordinary Time of the Roman Rite and the post-Pentecost Sundays of the Byzantine Rite to instruct the faithful in the concrete demands of Christian discipleship.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Council of Trent — Decree on Justification · Apostolic Fathers — Didache · Augustine — Our Lord's Sermon on the Mount · John Chrysostom — Homilies on Matthew
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (4 na pag-check)
- ✓ The prohibition against giving holy things to dogs is a sacramental injunction r
- ✓ Entering the kingdom requires not just vocal faith but doing the will of the Fat
- ✓ The command against judging forbids assuming the evil intentions of others but d
- ✓ The narrow gate requires a life of disciplined asceticism contrary to the broad
Eastern Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Eastern Orthodox tradition: Scripture within Holy Tradition and the consensus of the Fathers (patristic consensus). Emphases on theosis, the liturgy, the Septuagint text, apophatic mystery over precise definition, and the seven Ecumenical Councils.
Kagyat na kahulugan — In its immediate context, Matthew 7 concludes the Sermon on the Mount, transitioning from internal dispositions to specific ethical injunctions and final eschatological warnings. Jesus instructs His disciples on the dangers of hypocritical judgment (verses 1-5) and the necessity of discerning to whom holy things should be given (verse 6). He encourages persistence in prayer (verses 7-11), formulates the Golden Rule as the summation of the Torah (verse 12), and issues a series of dualistic warnings: the narrow and wide gates (verses 13-14), false and true prophets recognized by their fruits (verses 15-20), and those who merely say 'Lord, Lord' versus those who do the Father's will (verses 21-23). The discourse closes with the parable of the two builders (verses 24-27), establishing the necessity of actionable obedience to His teachings. The chapter concludes by noting the crowds' astonishment at His unmediated, divine authority, distinguishing Him from the scribes (verses 28-29).
Reception — The Eastern Orthodox tradition receives Matthew 7 through deeply liturgical and ascetic lenses. Verse 6 ('Give not that which is holy to the dogs') is foundational to Orthodox sacramental discipline. From the earliest patristic era, recorded in the Didache, this verse was understood as a strict prohibition against giving the Eucharist to the unbaptized, establishing the practice of closed communion. In Orthodox ascetic theology, verses 1-5 (the mote and the beam) are heavily emphasized as the cornerstone of spiritual life. Ascetic fathers like St. Dorotheos of Gaza read this passage as an absolute command against condemning one's neighbor, demanding radical self-reproach and constant attention to one's own sins (the 'beam'). Furthermore, verses 21-27 are central to the Orthodox understanding of 'synergy' (synergeia)—the cooperative working of divine grace and human will. St. John Chrysostom emphasizes that crying out 'Lord, Lord' (mere belief or verbal confession) is insufficient for salvation without the active fruit of repentance and obedience to the commandments, rejecting any concept of salvation by faith alone that excludes transformational works.
Application — Orthodox application of this chapter is prominent in both the Divine Liturgy and daily ascetic practice. The injunction to protect 'that which is holy' (verse 6) is applied practically in the Liturgy's dismissal of the catechumens and the priest's exclamation 'The holy things are for the holy' before communion, safeguarding the Eucharist from those not fully integrated into the Church. In personal spiritual life, the command 'Judge not' (verses 1-5) is integrated into daily prayers (such as the Lenten Prayer of St. Ephrem the Syrian, which asks God to grant the believer the ability 'to see my own transgressions, and not to judge my brother'). The 'narrow gate' (verses 13-14) is embraced as the path of askesis (fasting, prayer, and almsgiving) required to uproot the passions. The tradition teaches that entering the Kingdom (verses 21-23) requires building one's life upon the rock of Christ through active, synergistic effort in the pursuit of theosis.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Didache — Didache (The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles) · St. John Chrysostom — Homilies on the Gospel of Saint Matthew · St. Dorotheos of Gaza — Discourses (Discourse 6: On Refusal to Judge)
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (5 na pag-check)
- ✓ The command not to give what is holy to dogs is a primary scriptural warrant for
- ✓ The warning against the hypocritical judgment of the mote and the beam forms the
- ✓ The rejection of those who merely say 'Lord, Lord' demonstrates that human syner
- ✓ The parable of the wise and foolish builders is interpreted as demonstrating tha
- ✓ Liturgical practice safeguards the mysteries based on verse 6, structurally rest
Oriental Orthodoxaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Oriental Orthodox tradition (Coptic, Ethiopian, Armenian, Syriac): Scripture within the tradition of the first three Ecumenical Councils and the miaphysite Fathers (Athanasius, Cyril of Alexandria, Severus of Antioch). Deeply liturgical, ascetic, and typological reading; some of these churches hold wider canons.
Kagyat na kahulugan — In this concluding chapter of the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus issues a series of ethical and spiritual imperatives. He warns against hypocritical judgment, commands the protection of holy things, promises answers to persistent prayer, and contrasts two paths, two types of prophets, and two foundations for building a life. The chapter demands total obedience to Christ's teachings, warning that charismatic invocation ('Lord, Lord') is insufficient without doing the Father's will.
Reception — The Oriental Orthodox tradition receives Matthew 7 as a foundational text for both liturgical discipline and monastic asceticism. The prohibition against giving 'holy things to the dogs' (7:6) is universally interpreted through a mystagogical and Eucharistic lens, establishing the boundary of closed communion. The early Syrian-Alexandrian text, the Didache, formally applied this to the unbaptized, an interpretation preserved in the strict liturgical fencing of the Coptic, Syriac, and Armenian rites. The 'narrow gate' (7:13-14) serves as the scriptural mandate for the Desert Fathers' ascetic rigor; Cyril of Alexandria interprets this gate as the difficult but necessary mortification of fleshly desires to attain life. During the Christological controversies, miaphysite defenders like Severus of Antioch applied the test of 'fruits' (7:15-20) to false teachers, arguing that Chalcedonian or Nestorian teachings produced the 'bad fruit' of dividing the one incarnate Word. The concluding parable of the wise builder (7:24-27) is central to Syriac asceticism; Aphrahat identifies the 'rock' directly as Christ himself, upon whom the believer builds a steadfast life of faith and rigorous self-denial.
Application — Practically, this chapter governs the liturgical life and spiritual discipline of the Oriental Orthodox communion. Matthew 7:6 informs the deacon's warnings in the Divine Liturgy and the historic practice of dismissing the catechumens, ensuring only those baptized and in orthodox communion partake of the holy mysteries. The command to 'ask, seek, knock' (7:7) animates the unceasing prayer of the desert monks and the daily recitation of the Agpeya (Coptic Book of Hours). Furthermore, verses 21-23 ('Lord, Lord') serve as a sobering caution in monastic spiritual direction: true holiness and spiritual authority are never measured by charismatic speech, prophesy, or miracles, but by humble obedience, repentance, and steadfast adherence to the Orthodox faith.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Didache (Teaching of the Twelve Apostles) — Didache · Cyril of Alexandria — Fragments on Matthew · Severus of Antioch — Cathedral Homilies · Aphrahat — Demonstrations
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (5 na pag-check)
- ✓ The command not to give what is holy to dogs applies directly to protecting the
- ✓ The narrow gate is understood as the ascetic path of self-denial and the mortifi
- ✓ The teaching to know false prophets by their fruits is used as a polemical tool
- ✓ Performing miracles or calling upon Christ's name is insufficient for salvation
- ✓ The rock in the parable of the builders is interpreted Christologically as Jesus
Reformation Traditions · The magisterial churches of the sixteenth-century Reformation.
Anglican / Episcopalaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Anglican tradition (including the Episcopal Church): Scripture read with tradition and reason (Hooker); the Book of Common Prayer and the Thirty-Nine Articles; a comprehensiveness spanning evangelical, anglo-catholic, and broad/progressive readings — name that spectrum where the passage has been read across it.
Kagyat na kahulugan — The concluding chapter of the Sermon on the Mount presents Jesus teaching with unique authority (vv. 28-29). He outlines ethical demands regarding non-judgmentalism, avoiding hypocrisy (vv. 1-5), and practicing the Golden Rule as the summation of the Law and the Prophets (v. 12). The discourse concludes with eschatological warnings requiring a decisive choice: entering the narrow gate (vv. 13-14), discerning true from false prophets by their fruits (vv. 15-20), doing the Father's will rather than offering mere verbal profession (vv. 21-23), and the culminating parable of the wise and foolish builders, which bases ultimate security on actively doing Jesus' words (vv. 24-27).
Reception — The Anglican tradition receives this chapter through its characteristic synthesis of scripture, tradition, and reason. The Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion draws directly on Jesus' botanical metaphor in Article XII ('Of Good Works'), stating that a lively faith is as evidently known by good works 'as a tree discerned by the fruit' (vv. 16-20). Richard Hooker views the Golden Rule (v. 12) as a primary dictate of reason and natural law, demonstrating the consonance of Christ's teaching with human rationality. The comprehensiveness of the tradition yields distinct emphases across its spectrum: Evangelical Anglicans frequently focus on the stark existential choices of the narrow gate (vv. 13-14) and the necessity of building one's life on the rock of Christ's revealed truth (vv. 24-27). Meanwhile, Broad Church, Anglo-Catholic, and progressive Anglicans heavily emphasize the injunction not to judge (v. 1) and the Golden Rule as foundational for social ethics and inclusivity, often following Charles Gore in reading these commands as a practical, corporate moral law for the Church's engagement with society.
Application — Liturgically, Matthew 7 is foundational for Anglican sacramental rites. Jesus' promise regarding prayer ('Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you', vv. 7-8) is explicitly quoted in the Book of Common Prayer's liturgy for the Public Baptism of Infants, framing the sacrament as a faithful claiming of God's promise to open the gate of grace to those who knock. Additionally, the parable of the two builders informs the tradition's homiletic and devotional life, praying for the grace not merely to hear the Word, but to be doers of it, anchoring the life of the believer and the Church upon the rock of Christ's teaching.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion — Article XII: Of Good Works · Richard Hooker — Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity · Charles Gore — The Sermon on the Mount · Thomas Cranmer — The Book of Common Prayer
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (6 na pag-check)
- ✓ The chapter outlines ethical demands including non-judgmentalism, avoiding hypoc
- ✓ Jesus' teaching on good and corrupt trees is used to affirm that good works are
- ✓ The Golden Rule is viewed as aligning perfectly with human reason and natural la
- ✓ Progressive and Broad Church readings emphasize the command against judging othe
- ✓ The promises of asking, seeking, and knocking are quoted in the baptismal liturg
- ✓ The parable of the wise and foolish builders is used devotionally to emphasize d
Lutheranaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Lutheran tradition (the Book of Concord): the law–gospel distinction, justification by faith alone, sola scriptura held with the ecumenical creeds, the theology of the cross, and sacramental realism.
Kagyat na kahulugan — Jesus concludes his Sermon on the Mount by giving discrete instructions on judgment, persistent prayer, and the Golden Rule, before shifting to eschatological warnings. He contrasts the narrow and wide gates, warns against false prophets who are known by their fruits, and contrasts those who merely say 'Lord, Lord' with those who do the Father's will. Finally, he illustrates the necessity of hearing and doing his words through the parable of the wise and foolish builders, leaving the crowds astounded at his direct authority.
Reception — In the Lutheran tradition, Matthew 7 provides a critical foundation for distinguishing between faith and works, particularly through the analogy of the good and bad trees (Matthew 7:16-19). Martin Luther, in 'The Freedom of a Christian', famously uses this passage to establish that works do not make a person good; rather, a good person does good works. The tree must first be made good by faith before it can produce good fruit. This is codified in the 'Formula of Concord' (Solid Declaration), which uses the tree imagery to articulate that true faith is never without good works, yet those works are the spontaneous result, not the cause, of justification. Additionally, Philip Melanchthon in the 'Apology of the Augsburg Confession' utilizes the warning against false prophets in sheep's clothing (Matthew 7:15) to address the reality of hypocrites within the visible church, emphasizing that teaching contrary to the Gospel is the evil fruit by which they are exposed. The Sermon's stringent ethical demands (such as the Golden Rule in Matthew 7:12) are characteristically read through the second use of the Law, functioning as a mirror to crush self-righteousness, while the promises to those who ask, seek, and knock (Matthew 7:7-11) are received as pure Gospel, assuring the terrified conscience of the Father's unmerited favor.
Application — Lutheran homiletics applies this chapter by driving hearers away from relying on their own moral performance (the sand) and toward reliance on Christ's alien righteousness (the rock). Pastors warn against the 'wolves' of works-righteousness and false doctrine. In pastoral care, verses 7-11 are used to encourage confident, persistent prayer, reminding believers that if sinful humans know how to give good gifts, the Heavenly Father will certainly give grace to those who ask. Ethical exhortation focuses on the Christian's vocation: because the believer has been made a good tree in Christ, they are freed to spontaneously bear good fruit for their neighbor in love, without calculating these works for their own salvation.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Martin Luther — The Freedom of a Christian · Formula of Concord — Solid Declaration · Philip Melanchthon — Apology of the Augsburg Confession
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (5 na pag-check)
- ✓ Jesus concludes his teaching by contrasting two ways, two trees, and two builder
- ✓ The analogy of the good and bad trees proves that a person must be justified by
- ✓ False prophets in sheep's clothing refer to hypocrites and false teachers in the
- ✓ Believers are encouraged to pray with confidence because God is a loving Father
- ✓ The wise builder builds on the rock of Christ's promises rather than the sand of
Reformed / Presbyterianaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Reformed tradition (Calvin; the Westminster Standards; the Heidelberg and Belgic confessions): the sovereignty of God and covenant theology, a redemptive-historical reading of Scripture, and the regulative principle.
Kagyat na kahulugan — In the conclusion of the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus issues a series of ethical commands and eschatological warnings. He forbids hypocritical judgment, assures his disciples of the Father's provision for those who ask, seek, and knock, and summarizes the Law and the Prophets in the Golden Rule. Jesus then contrasts two paths (the narrow and wide gates), warns against false prophets who are recognized by their fruit, and denounces false disciples who rely on outward professions and miraculous works rather than doing the will of the Father. He concludes with the parable of the two builders, illustrating the necessity of hearing and doing his words, leaving the crowds astonished at his authority.
Reception — The Reformed tradition reads Matthew 7 through the lenses of covenantal adoption, sovereign election, and the organic connection between justification and sanctification. First, Jesus’ exhortation to 'ask, seek, and knock' (vv. 7-11) anchors Reformed teachings on the necessity of prayer. The Heidelberg Catechism frames this passage as the basis for why Christians must pray: God gives His grace and Holy Spirit only to those who earnestly and continually ask Him. This reflects covenant theology, where God acts as a willing Father providing for His adopted children. Second, the arboreal metaphor—that a good tree produces good fruit (vv. 16-18)—is a central prooftext for the Reformed understanding of good works. The Westminster Confession of Faith and the Belgic Confession invoke this logic to insist that true faith cannot be idle. Good works do not merit salvation, but they are the necessary, visible fruits and evidences of a regenerate heart and a true, living faith. Finally, Jesus' terrifying warning to those who say 'Lord, Lord' (vv. 21-23) heavily informs Reformed ecclesiology and soteriology. John Calvin, in his *Institutes of the Christian Religion*, points to Christ’s words 'I never knew you' to distinguish between the visible church (which includes hypocrites with temporary faith) and the invisible church of the elect. In this redemptive-historical reading, Christ's 'knowing' is not mere cognitive awareness but electing, covenantal love. Those who practice lawlessness, regardless of their miraculous gifts or orthodox professions, demonstrate they were never truly united to Christ or foreknown in God's eternal decree.
Application — The Reformed tradition applies Matthew 7 by calling believers to rigorous self-examination. Pastors urge congregants not to rest their assurance on outward church membership, intellectual profession, or visible spiritual gifts, but to look for the fruit of sincere obedience to God's moral law. Believers are exhorted to build their lives exclusively on the Rock of Christ's Word, trusting in His sovereign grace while fervently praying for the Holy Spirit's assistance to walk the narrow path.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Zacharias Ursinus and Caspar Olevianus — Heidelberg Catechism · Westminster Divines — Westminster Confession of Faith · John Calvin — Institutes of the Christian Religion
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (4 na pag-check)
- ✓ Jesus' commands to ask, seek, and knock establish the necessity of prayer for re
- ✓ The metaphor of a good tree producing good fruit illustrates that good works are
- ✓ Christ's declaration 'I never knew you' reveals that true salvation is based on
- ✓ Believers are called to self-examination to ensure their faith manifests in hear
Free-Church & Revival Traditions · Believers'-church, revival, and restorationist movements.
Baptistaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Baptist tradition (e.g. the 1689 Second London Confession, the Baptist Faith & Message — note the range): believers' baptism, congregational polity, liberty of conscience, a memorial reading of the ordinances, and strong emphasis on personal conversion and biblical authority.
Kagyat na kahulugan — In the conclusion of the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus issues a series of directives regarding interpersonal relationships, prayer, and spiritual discernment. He warns against hypocritical judgment, encourages persistent reliance on the Father for good gifts, and summarizes the Law and the Prophets with the Golden Rule. The chapter concludes with a series of stark eschatological contrasts—the narrow and wide gates, good and bad trees, true and false disciples, and wise and foolish builders—emphasizing that mere verbal profession is insufficient without active obedience to His authoritative teaching.
Reception — The Baptist tradition receives Matthew 7 as a critical text for its doctrines of personal conversion, regenerate church membership, and biblical authority. The chapter's intense focus on examining internal reality versus external profession deeply informs the Baptist rejection of both state-church nominalism and pedobaptism. Verses 16-20 ('by their fruits ye shall know them') and the terrifying warning to those who cry 'Lord, Lord' but are rejected by Christ (vv. 21-23) are central to the Baptist insistence that church membership be restricted to those demonstrating credible evidence of salvation. John Gill, in his 'Exposition of the Old and New Testaments', emphasizes that the 'good tree' yielding 'good fruit' represents a person who has experienced an internal, regenerating work of grace, which must precede any valid outward religious profession or ordinance. Charles Spurgeon, in 'The Gospel of the Kingdom', draws heavily on the contrasts of the narrow gate (vv. 13-14) and the builders (vv. 24-27) to warn against the false assurance generated by merely participating in religious activities—even prophesying or doing mighty works—without a personal, saving knowledge of Christ ('I never knew you'). Furthermore, the opening instructions on removing the beam from one's own eye (vv. 1-5) instruct congregational polity, establishing that church discipline and mutual accountability must be rooted in humility and self-examination rather than hypocritical superiority.
Application — Baptists apply this chapter extensively in evangelistic preaching, using the 'narrow gate' to urge individuals toward personal repentance and conversion rather than resting on cultural Christianity. In the governance of the local church, the mandate to assess 'fruit' is practically applied when congregations or elders interview candidates for believers' baptism and church membership, looking for genuine evidence of a transformed life. The parable of the wise and foolish builders is regularly employed in discipleship to underscore that submitting to biblical authority means actively obeying Christ's commands, not merely hearing them in a church service.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:John Gill — Exposition of the Old and New Testaments · Charles Spurgeon — The Gospel of the Kingdom
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (6 na pag-check)
- ✓ Jesus commands his followers to avoid hypocritical judgment and instead practice
- ✓ The text concludes the Sermon on the Mount with eschatological warnings requirin
- ✓ The warning that false prophets are known by their fruit proves the necessity of
- ✓ The rejection of those who claim to have prophesied in Jesus' name without actua
- ✓ Congregations apply the standard of examining 'fruits' when interviewing candida
- ✓ The imagery of the narrow gate is used in evangelistic calls to emphasize the ne
Methodist / Wesleyan / Holinessaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Wesleyan-Holiness tradition: prevenient grace and free response, sanctification and entire sanctification / Christian perfection, the Wesleyan quadrilateral (Scripture primary, with tradition, reason, and experience), and warm-hearted practical piety.
Kagyat na kahulugan — Matthew 7 concludes the Sermon on the Mount, presenting a series of ethical commands and warnings. Jesus forbids hypocritical judgment, promises that God will give good gifts to those who ask, seek, and knock, and summarizes the Law and the Prophets in the Golden Rule. He then introduces a series of stark dualities: the narrow and wide gates, good and bad trees, true and false disciples, and wise and foolish builders. The chapter emphasizes that hearing Jesus' words is insufficient; they must be put into practice. The narrative concludes by noting the crowds' astonishment at Jesus' authoritative teaching.
Reception — In the Wesleyan-Holiness tradition, Matthew 7 is a central text for defending practical piety and refuting antinomianism. John Wesley, in his 'Sermons on Several Occasions' (specifically the discourses on the Sermon on the Mount), views this chapter as detailing the necessary outward manifestation of the inward holiness described earlier in the Sermon. The progression of 'ask, seek, knock' (vv. 7-8) is understood as an invitation to pursue prevenient, justifying, and sanctifying grace with increasing fervor, reflecting the tradition's synergism and emphasis on free response. Furthermore, Jesus' warning that only those who 'do the will of my Father' will enter the kingdom (v. 21) is historically read by Methodists as proof that present justification does not guarantee final salvation apart from a life of active obedience and fruit-bearing. The 'narrow gate' (v. 13) is interpreted as the rigorous path of universal holiness, contrasting sharply with the 'broad way' of nominal religion.
Application — The tradition applies Matthew 7 intensely in its structures of accountability and spiritual formation. The command to remove the beam from one's own eye (vv. 3-5) informed early Methodist class meetings, emphasizing self-examination before correcting others. The principle of knowing a tree 'by its fruits' (vv. 16-20) remains the primary diagnostic in the Wesleyan tradition for evaluating charismatic experiences, revivals, and personal claims of entire sanctification; subjective spiritual feelings must be validated by objective moral transformation and holy tempers. Preaching frequently exhorts believers to 'build upon the rock' (vv. 24-27) by translating warm-hearted piety into tangible works of mercy and piety, ensuring that their faith is not a mere intellectual assent but a transformative obedience that can withstand the storms of life and judgment.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:John Wesley — Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament · John Wesley — Sermons on Several Occasions
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (5 na pag-check)
- ✓ The command to ask, seek, and knock is an invitation to pursue grace with increa
- ✓ The narrow gate represents the rigorous and restricted path of inward and outwar
- ✓ Spiritual experiences and leaders must be evaluated 'by their fruits,' using obj
- ✓ Christ's rejection of those who call him 'Lord' without obedience proves that tr
- ✓ Building a house on the rock is the active practice of putting Christ's teaching
Anabaptist / Mennoniteaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Anabaptist tradition (Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite): a Jesus-centered reading with the Sermon on the Mount as normative, believers' baptism, nonviolence and nonresistance, simple living, communal discernment, and the church as a visible community distinct from worldly power.
Kagyat na kahulugan — Jesus concludes the Sermon on the Mount by giving practical and ultimate imperatives. He prohibits hypocritical judgment, warning that the measure used on others will be returned, and demands self-correction before correcting a brother (7:1-5). He warns against casting pearls before swine (7:6) and encourages persistent prayer to a good Father who gives good gifts (7:7-11). He summarizes the Law and the Prophets in the Golden Rule (7:12). The discourse concludes with a series of stark contrasts demanding a choice: the narrow gate versus the broad way (7:13-14), good trees producing good fruit versus corrupt trees yielding evil fruit (7:15-20), those who do the Father's will versus those who merely cry 'Lord, Lord' (7:21-23), and the wise builder who hears and obeys Jesus' words versus the foolish builder who hears but does not act (7:24-27). The crowds are astonished by his direct, intrinsic authority (7:28-29).
Reception — In the Anabaptist tradition, Matthew 7 is the culminating mandate for 'Nachfolge Christi' (discipleship), establishing that true faith is inherently visible, active, and obedient. The chapter fundamentally shapes the tradition's insistence on orthopraxy over mere orthodoxy. The 'Two Ways' paradigm (7:13-14) is a central theological lens: early leaders like Dirk Philips, in his 'Enchiridion', identified the 'broad way' with the magisterial state churches that relied on worldly power and coercion, while the 'narrow way' was walked by the nonresistant, suffering minority of the true, visible church. Furthermore, the injunction to know true prophets by their fruits (7:15-20) served as a primary critique of both Catholic and Magisterial Protestant reformers. Menno Simons, in his 'Reply to Gellius Faber', utilized this passage to argue that right doctrine cannot exist without the fruit of a transformed, peaceable life. Most crucially, verses 21-27 provide the Anabaptist counter-weight to purely forensic views of justification. For thinkers like Hans Denck, crying 'Lord, Lord' (7:21) without actually performing the ethical demands of the Sermon on the Mount constitutes building one's house on the sand (7:26); true belief requires literal obedience to Christ's teachings.
Application — The tradition applies Matthew 7 through radical adherence to Christian ethics, particularly nonresistance, simple living, and active communal discipleship. The command to 'judge not' (7:1) is applied structurally to forbid believers from participating in the coercive justice systems of the state, such as swearing oaths, wielding the sword, or serving as civil magistrates, while reserving loving, non-coercive discernment for the church community. The instruction to evaluate fruits (7:16-20) is practiced in communal discernment, where the selection of ministers prioritizes character, nonviolence, and moral integrity over academic theology or claims to charismatic gifts (7:22). Building one's house on the rock (7:24) is prayed and enacted as a commitment to nonconformity—the conscious choice to follow the narrow way (7:14) of Jesus' specific ethical teachings, anticipating that it will provoke cultural marginalization or persecution.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Menno Simons — Reply to Gellius Faber · Dirk Philips — Enchiridion · Hans Denck — Concerning True Love
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (5 na pag-check)
- ✓ The narrow gate and broad way describe the contrast between the persecuted, fait
- ✓ True prophets and authentic believers are verified not by right doctrine alone,
- ✓ Verbal confession or charismatic signs without active obedience to Jesus' ethica
- ✓ The prohibition against judging forbids believers from employing worldly, coerci
- ✓ Building one's house on the rock requires the literal, active practice of Jesus'
Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal tradition (Assemblies of God, Church of God, and kindred bodies): the present continuation of the gifts of the Spirit, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine healing, and expectancy of God's present action, read within Nicene Trinitarian faith. Do NOT attribute Word-of-Faith / prosperity or later neo-charismatic distinctives to classical Pentecostalism generally.
Kagyat na kahulugan — In the concluding chapter of the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus issues a series of direct commands regarding discipleship and the kingdom of God. He forbids hypocritical judgment (vv. 1-5), cautions against offering holy things to the unappreciative (v. 6), and exhorts his followers to persistent prayer, assuring them of the Father's good provision (vv. 7-11). He summarizes the ethical demands of the Law and Prophets in the Golden Rule (v. 12) and urges entrance through the narrow gate (vv. 13-14). Crucially, Jesus warns against false prophets, providing the test of 'fruit' to discern their true nature (vv. 15-20). He then delivers a sobering decree that spectacular spiritual works—including prophecy, exorcism, and miracles done in his name—are not proof of genuine relationship with him; only obedience to the Father's will suffices (vv. 21-23). The discourse concludes with the parable of the two builders, contrasting the ultimate fate of those who obey his words with those who merely hear them (vv. 24-27).
Reception — Classical Trinitarian Pentecostalism places immense weight on Matthew 7, utilizing it as the primary theological safeguard for a continuationist, Spirit-empowered worldview. Verses 7-11 ('Ask, and it will be given you') are received as the scriptural foundation for expectant prayer, particularly the practice of 'tarrying' for the Baptism in the Holy Spirit and spiritual gifts. Pentecostal pioneers read the promise that the Father will give 'good gifts' to those who ask (v. 11) as an absolute assurance that believers seeking the Spirit will not receive a counterfeit or demonic manifestation (Donald Gee, 'Concerning Spiritual Gifts'). However, the chapter's most critical function in Pentecostal reception is its boundary-setting regarding the charismata (spiritual gifts). Because Classical Pentecostalism anticipates the present operation of prophecy, exorcism, and miracles, it wrestles directly with Jesus' warning in verses 21-23. The tradition insists that charismatic manifestations do not equal divine approval, spiritual maturity, or even genuine salvation. Early leaders like William J. Seymour emphasized that spiritual gifts without holiness and divine love are ultimately rejected by Christ as 'iniquity' (William J. Seymour, 'The Apostolic Faith'). Discernment within the movement is thus governed by verses 15-20. A prophet or evangelist is validated not by their supernatural power, but by their moral and spiritual fruit. The tradition maintains a strict, functional distinction between the gifts of the Spirit (which can be misappropriated by those who practice lawlessness, v. 23) and the fruit of the Spirit (which alone confirms the presence of saving faith and obedience to the Father's will) (Stanley Horton, 'Systematic Theology: A Pentecostal Perspective').
Application — In Pentecostal worship and altar ministry, believers are exhorted to persistently 'ask, seek, and knock' (v. 7) for healing, deliverance, and the Baptism in the Holy Spirit, approaching God with the absolute confidence that He is a good Father (v. 11). Concurrently, pastoral application relies heavily on the 'fruit test' (v. 16-20) to evaluate purported revivals, prophetic utterances, or high-profile healing ministries, guarding the flock against charismatic abuses. The terrifying warning of verse 23 ('I never knew you') is frequently preached to instill the fear of the Lord, reminding the congregation that building one's house on the rock (v. 24) requires ongoing sanctification and obedience to Christ's moral teachings, not merely the enjoyment of Pentecostal phenomena.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Donald Gee — Concerning Spiritual Gifts · William J. Seymour — The Apostolic Faith · Stanley Horton — Systematic Theology: A Pentecostal Perspective
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (6 na pag-check)
- ✓ Jesus commands persistent prayer and promises that the Father gives good gifts,
- ✓ Jesus warns that miraculous works like prophecy, casting out demons, and mighty
- ✓ The promise of the Father giving 'good things' is read as an assurance against r
- ✓ Charismatic gifts do not guarantee salvation or divine approval; they must be ac
- ✓ True prophets and ministries within the church are to be discerned and evaluated
- ✓ Believers are encouraged to pray persistently for healing and spiritual gifts ba
Seventh-day Adventistaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Seventh-day Adventist tradition: the seventh-day Sabbath, the great-controversy theme, conditional immortality, sanctuary theology, and a historicist reading of prophecy.
Kagyat na kahulugan — Matthew 7 concludes the Sermon on the Mount with practical ethical instructions and a series of eschatological warnings. Jesus forbids hypocritical judgment (Matthew 7:1-5), encourages persistent prayer based on the Father's goodness (Matthew 7:7-11), and summarizes the Law and the Prophets in the Golden Rule (Matthew 7:12). The chapter closes with a series of stark dualisms requiring a definitive choice: the narrow and broad gates and ways (Matthew 7:13-14), true and false prophets known by their fruits rather than their appearances (Matthew 7:15-20), true and false disciples separated by their actual obedience to the Father's will rather than mere verbal profession (Matthew 7:21-23), and the wise and foolish builders whose foundations are tested by the storm (Matthew 7:24-27).
Reception — In Seventh-day Adventist theology, Matthew 7 is foundational for understanding the relationship between faith, obedience, and spiritual discernment. Ellen G. White's commentary in 'Thoughts from the Mount of Blessing' establishes that the 'strait gate' and 'narrow way' (verses 13-14) represent the path of self-denial and adherence to God's law, which contrasts sharply with the broad road of popular, accommodating religion. A distinctive Adventist reception centers on the great-controversy theme in verses 21-23. Adventists emphasize the underlying Greek word for 'iniquity' (anomia, meaning lawlessness). Ellen G. White, in 'The Great Controversy', utilizes these verses to describe end-time religious deception, where movements will perform apparent miracles ('cast out demons,' 'mighty works') while simultaneously rejecting the binding nature of the Ten Commandments—often pointing specifically to the rejection of the seventh-day Sabbath. Thus, 'fruits' (verses 16-20) are defined not by the presence of supernatural power, but by obedience to God's moral law and the reproduction of Christ's character.
Application — Adventists apply this chapter to urge a holistic, obedient faith over a merely professing one. It serves as a vital safeguard against spiritual deception; the church teaches its members that miracles, signs, and the endorsement of the majority are never reliable tests of truth. Instead, believers are called to test all spiritual claims, including purported prophetic voices, by their 'fruits'—their conformity to Scripture and God's law. In pastoral and evangelistic settings, the chapter is a call to build one's life securely on the 'rock' (verse 24) of Christ's word, which requires yielding to His transforming grace and keeping His commandments, even when it means walking the less popular, narrow path.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Ellen G. White — Thoughts from the Mount of Blessing · Ellen G. White — The Great Controversy
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (4 na pag-check)
- ✓ The broad and narrow gates represent the choice between popular, accommodating r
- ✓ The 'iniquity' (lawlessness) condemned by Jesus refers specifically to the disre
- ✓ Miracles and mighty works are not the true test of a prophet or a believer; rath
- ✓ Building on the rock signifies actively doing the words of Christ, thereby uniti
Restorationist / Churches of Christaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Restoration Movement tradition (Churches of Christ, Christian Churches — formally non-creedal): restore New Testament Christianity, 'speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where it is silent,' reading by direct command, apostolic example, and necessary inference; baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; the weekly Lord's Supper.
Kagyat na kahulugan — Matthew 7 concludes the Sermon on the Mount, presenting a series of ethical instructions and stark binary choices regarding the kingdom of heaven. The chapter moves from prohibitions against hypocritical judgment and the profane treatment of holy things, to assurances of God's provision for those who ask, seek, and knock. It culminates in a series of eschatological warnings: the narrow versus the wide gate, true versus false prophets known by their fruit, the insufficiency of merely verbal profession ('Lord, Lord') without active obedience, and the concluding parable of the wise and foolish builders, which grounds survival in the coming storm strictly on hearing and doing the words of Jesus.
Reception — Within the Restoration Movement (Churches of Christ), Matthew 7 is a pivotal text for articulating the absolute necessity of active obedience in salvation, serving as a primary counter-text to Protestant doctrines of 'faith only' (sola fide). Verses 21-23 are universally recognized in this tradition as foundational: saying 'Lord, Lord' is interpreted as intellectual assent or a mere verbal profession of faith (often explicitly identified with the 'Sinner's Prayer' of modern evangelicalism), which Jesus condemns if it is separated from 'doing the will of my Father.' This 'will' is understood to include obeying the specific commands of the New Testament pattern, notably repentance and baptism for the remission of sins. T.W. Brents utilized this passage extensively to argue that no amount of religious zeal or subjective experience can substitute for exact compliance with the Gospel plan. Similarly, the parable of the wise and foolish builders (vv. 24-27) reinforces the tradition's insistence on 'hearing and doing.' J.W. McGarvey's exegesis of the chapter also highlights the harmony of its commands; for instance, he argues that the command 'Judge not' (v. 1) is not a ban on moral or doctrinal discernment—which would contradict the immediate commands to identify 'dogs,' 'swine,' and 'false prophets' (vv. 6, 15)—but a prohibition against censorious, hypocritical judgment that ignores one's own faults (v. 5). The 'narrow gate' (v. 13-14) has historically resonated with the movement's early sectarian identity, representing the strict path of biblical restoration over and against the broad way of denominationalism and human creeds.
Application — Ministers in the Churches of Christ frequently preach from Matthew 7 to urge congregants to examine the scriptural authority for their religious practices. Sermons on verses 21-23 often emphasize the tragedy of being 'religiously wrong'—warning that sincere people who perform 'many mighty works' but fail to follow the authorized New Testament pattern will be rejected. Apologetically, the tradition frequently addresses verse 1 ('Judge not') to counter modern cultural relativism, teaching that Christians must exercise righteous judgment and inspect 'fruit' (v. 16) to expose false teaching while maintaining personal purity.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:J.W. McGarvey — Commentary on Matthew and Mark · T.W. Brents — The Gospel Plan of Salvation
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (6 na pag-check)
- ✓ The command 'Judge not' prohibits hypocritical and censorious judgment, but does
- ✓ The 'narrow gate' and 'strait way' are often associated with the strict adherenc
- ✓ Saying 'Lord, Lord' represents faith without works or a mere verbal profession,
- ✓ Doing 'the will of my Father' requires explicit obedience to the steps of salvat
- ✓ Religious sincerity and unauthorized good works will result in ultimate rejectio
- ✓ True discipleship requires both hearing the words of Jesus and actively performi
Inalis sa boto matapos bumagsak nang dalawang beses sa pagsusuri: academic. Muling kinwenta ang listahan ng mga kwalipikado nang wala sila.
Hakbang 3Mga panel na hindi bumoboto at pahambing na apendiks
Nagbibigay-impormasyon ang mga ito sa mga tala at sa pagsasalin, at iniulat dito, pero hindi kailanman binibilang sa boto.
Academic textual-historical analysisaudit ✗
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Academic textual-historical analysis: philology and the original-language text, textual criticism, ancient Near Eastern (and, for the NT, Greco-Roman) context, literary genre and form, composition and dating debates, and reception history. Describe scholarly positions and their evidence without confessional commitment. This panel informs the textual notes and the rendering; it is never a church vote.
Kagyat na kahulugan — Matthew 7 concludes the discourse known as the Sermon on the Mount, transitioning from specific ethical instructions to a series of summary maxims, warnings, and parables of judgment. Form-critically, the chapter employs a variety of wisdom and prophetic genres, including prohibitions (verses 1-6), a fortiori arguments (verses 9-11), agricultural metaphors (verses 16-20), and dualistic parables (verses 24-27). The text shifts from instructions on community relations—such as the warning against judging others and the esoteric command regarding 'dogs' and 'swine'—to assurances of divine provision, before closing with acute eschatological warnings. The concluding verses (verses 28-29) provide a narrative frame, contrasting the authority of Jesus with that of the local scribes.
Reception — Academic reception of this chapter focuses heavily on source criticism, literary structure, and the socio-historical reconstruction of the Matthean community. Source critics widely identify the bulk of the chapter as originating from the Q source, noting close parallels in Luke's Sermon on the Plain (Luke 6) and other Lukan contexts (Luke 11 and 13). Verse 6 (pearls before swine) is typically assigned to the M (special Matthean) tradition, which scholars like Ulrich Luz interpret as evidence of early Jewish-Christian boundary maintenance. Regarding literary structure, commentators such as W.D. Davies and Dale C. Allison observe that scholars frequently read verse 12 (the Golden Rule) as a deliberate redactional inclusio linking back to Matthew 5:17, structurally bracketing the central ethical demands of the Law and the Prophets. Furthermore, the warnings against 'false prophets' and 'workers of lawlessness' (anomian) in verses 15-23 are analyzed by scholars like Günther Bornkamm as reflections of intra-Christian polemics, suggesting the later Matthean community was distinguishing itself from antinomian or enthusiastic factions.
Application — In academic praxis, this chapter is applied as a primary text for teaching the methodologies of source and form criticism, particularly the Synoptic problem. It is also utilized in the historical reconstruction of early Christian social dynamics, demonstrating how emerging Jesus-movements negotiated community boundaries, authority, and the enduring role of the Jewish Law.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Ulrich Luz — Matthew 1-7 (Hermeneia) · W.D. Davies and Dale C. Allison — A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Matthew · Günther Bornkamm — Tradition and Interpretation in Matthew · Hans Dieter Betz — The Sermon on the Mount: A Commentary
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (5 na pag-check)
- ✓ The chapter concludes the discourse with narrative commentary highlighting the c
- ✓ Scholars identify the saying regarding dogs and swine as M material reflecting t
- ✓ Literary and redaction critics argue that the Golden Rule's mention of the Law a
- ✓ The polemic against those who cry 'Lord, Lord' but work lawlessness is historica
- ✗ The chapter is utilized in university settings as a foundational exercise for an — decorative authority
Jewish interpretationaudit ✓
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Jewish interpretation of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible books only; do not treat the New Testament as Scripture, and address it only historically if at all). Distinguish rabbinic (Talmud, Midrash), medieval (Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and the classical mefarshim), and modern (including critical and denominational) voices rather than presenting one uniform Jewish position. This panel informs, and is reported, but never a Christian church vote.
Kagyat na kahulugan — Jewish interpretation approaches Matthew 7 not as canonical Scripture, but as a historical document reflecting first-century Jewish ethical instruction and wisdom literature. The chapter, concluding the Sermon on the Mount, consists of maxims, agricultural metaphors, and parables characteristic of Second Temple Jewish pedagogy. Its immediate historical meaning is understood as the instruction of a Jewish teacher emphasizing interpersonal justice, authentic religious practice, and ethical reciprocity, utilizing the rhetorical exaggerations and vivid imagery common to the sages of his era.
Reception — Because the New Testament is not part of the Jewish canon, the reception of Matthew 7 is historically and comparatively focused rather than theological. For centuries, Jewish scholars have noted striking, often verbatim parallels between this chapter and classical Rabbinic literature, demonstrating that Jesus' teachings were firmly embedded in the Pharisaic Judaism of his day. The principle of reciprocity in 7:2 ('with what measure you mete') is identical to the foundational rabbinic concept of 'middah keneged middah' (measure for measure) found in Mishnah Sotah 1:7. The famous 'speck and beam' metaphor (7:3-5) appears as a popular proverb cited by Rabbi Tarfon in the Babylonian Talmud (Arakhin 16b). Most notably, the Golden Rule (7:12) is universally compared by Jewish scholars to Hillel's earlier negative formulation in Shabbat 31a: 'That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow.' Modern Jewish historians, such as Joseph Klausner, have argued that the ethical content of this chapter is entirely continuous with Pharisaic moral teaching. Consequently, modern Jewish scholars like Geza Vermes view the concluding verse (7:29), which claims Jesus taught 'not as the scribes,' as a later Matthean polemic. This editorial framing is seen as an artificial attempt to distance Jesus from his own Jewish context, masking the reality that he taught precisely like a Jewish scribe or sage.
Application — Matthew 7 has no liturgical, normative, or theological application in Judaism. Its application is strictly confined to historical Jesus studies and interfaith dialogue. Jewish readers and scholars utilize this chapter to demonstrate the shared ethical bedrock of Judaism and Christianity, actively pushing back against supersessionist claims that Jesus offered a fundamentally new or superior ethic compared to the Torah and the rabbinic tradition.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Rabbinic Tradition — Mishnah Sotah · Rabbi Tarfon — Babylonian Talmud, Arakhin · Hillel the Elder — Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat · Joseph Klausner — Jesus of Nazareth · Geza Vermes — The Religion of Jesus the Jew
pagsusuri sa antas ng claim (4 na pag-check)
- ✓ The standard of reciprocal judgment aligns directly with the rabbinic concept of
- ✓ The metaphor of the speck and the beam parallels a known Jewish proverb concerni
- ✓ The Golden Rule is a positive formulation of an ethical principle heavily emphas
- ✓ The description of Jesus teaching 'not as the scribes' is viewed as an anti-Jewi
Pahambing na apendiks — sa labas ng listahang Nicene-Trinitarian (Latter-day Saint, Jehovah's Witnesses)
Latter-day Saint
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Latter-day Saint reading (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints): the Bible read alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, with living prophets and continuing revelation, and the Joseph Smith Translation where relevant. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Kagyat na kahulugan — In this gospel narrative concluding the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus issues a series of ethical and spiritual directives: warnings against hypocritical judgment, commands to seek God persistently, the formulation of the Golden Rule, the metaphor of the narrow gate, the test for identifying false prophets by their fruits, and the parable of the wise and foolish builders to emphasize acting upon his words.
Reception — Latter-day Saint reception of Matthew 7 is fundamentally shaped by the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) and the parallel sermon in 3 Nephi 14 of the Book of Mormon. The JST significantly alters the opening prohibition against judging. Instead of an absolute 'Judge not,' the JST reads, 'Judge not unrighteously, that ye be not judged; but judge righteous judgment.' This forms a core theological distinction in the tradition between forbidden 'final judgments' and necessary 'intermediate judgments' of people and situations. Furthermore, the JST prefaces verse 6 with an instruction to the apostles to keep the 'mysteries of the kingdom' within themselves rather than casting them before those unprepared. Verses 15 through 20 regarding false prophets and their fruits serve as a primary apologetic text; theologians and leaders consistently point to the Book of Mormon, the pioneer heritage, and the modern Church organization as the 'good fruit' that validates Joseph Smith's status as a true prophet. Finally, verse 21 is a central prooftext against 'faith alone' soteriologies, read as demanding active obedience, partaking in ordinances, and keeping covenants to enter the kingdom of heaven.
Application — Application centers on the daily exercise of righteous discernment without condemning others' eternal standing. Members frequently invoke the 'fruits' test to evaluate spiritual claims, teachings, and their own personal discipleship. The command to 'ask, seek, and knock' is heavily applied to the process of receiving personal revelation, specifically reflecting Joseph Smith's own foundational quest for truth. The parable of the wise builder is widely used in teaching youth and families, heavily cross-referenced with Book of Mormon passages about building one's foundation on Jesus Christ to withstand the storms of life and the adversary.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Joseph Smith — Joseph Smith Translation · Dallin H. Oaks — 'Judge Not' and Judging (Ensign, 1999) · LeGrand Richards — A Marvelous Work and a Wonder · James E. Talmage — Jesus the Christ
Jehovah's Witnesses
Lens na ibinigay sa model:Jehovah's Witness reading (Watch Tower Society): attention to the divine name, God's Kingdom as a real government, conditional immortality, and a non-Trinitarian Christology. Presented for comparison only; outside the Nicene-Trinitarian roster.
Kagyat na kahulugan — In the conclusion of the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus issues a series of warnings and commands regarding daily discipleship and ultimate judgment. He cautions against hypocritical judgment of others (Matthew 7:1-5) and the careless sharing of holy things (verse 6). He guarantees that the heavenly Father will answer persistent prayer (verses 7-11) and provides the Golden Rule as a summary of the Law and Prophets (verse 12). The chapter closes with four stark contrasts that demand a decision: the narrow and broad gates leading to life or destruction (verses 13-14), true and false prophets known by their fruit (verses 15-20), true and false disciples distinguished by their obedience to the Father's will rather than mere verbal profession (verses 21-23), and the wise and foolish builders whose foundations are tested by storms (verses 24-27).
Reception — Jehovah's Witnesses read Matthew 7 as a foundational text for distinguishing true worship from false religion. The chapter heavily informs their non-Trinitarian theology and their doctrine of conditional immortality. In verse 21, Jesus clearly distinguishes himself ('Lord, Lord') from 'my Father who is in heaven' (Jehovah), establishing that entering the Kingdom—understood by Witnesses as a real heavenly government—requires active obedience to Jehovah's will, not just belief in Jesus. Furthermore, the 'destruction' at the end of the broad road (verse 13) is interpreted literally as eternal non-existence (annihilation), standing in direct opposition to Christendom's doctrine of hellfire. The Watch Tower Society identifies the 'false prophets' (verse 15) and 'workers of lawlessness' (verse 23) primarily with the clergy of Christendom, who claim to represent Christ but produce 'rotten fruit' (verses 16-20) such as political involvement, participation in wars, and unbiblical doctrines like the Trinity. True discipleship is therefore proven by producing the 'good fruit' of living by Jehovah's righteous standards and actively preaching the good news.
Application — Jehovah's Witnesses apply this chapter by emphasizing the absolute necessity of active obedience and separation from the world. Finding the 'narrow gate' (verses 13-14) is applied to the deliberate choice to join and remain within Jehovah's organization, despite it being a minority path. The requirement to 'do the will of my Father' (verse 21) is practically applied to the mandatory public preaching and disciple-making work. To 'build one's house on the rock' (verses 24-27), Witnesses are taught to diligently study the Bible and immediately apply its counsel, which prepares them to withstand the 'storms' of persecution, tests of faith, and the impending end of Satan's system of things.
Mga pinangalanang awtoridad:Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Jesus—The Way, the Truth, the Life · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — Insight on the Scriptures · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society — The Watchtower
Hakbang 4Itatag ang batayan sa orihinal na wika
Binuo ang pagsasalin mula sa orihinal na teksto, hindi mula sa nakararami sa Ingles.
Batayang tekstuwal — Public-domain Greek New Testament text (Nestle-Aland/SBLGNT tradition).
Banal na mga pangalan — Kyrios (Lord)
- v2: The Textus Receptus has ἀντιμετρηθήσεται ('measured back/again') instead of μετρηθήσεται ('measured').
- v13: The Greek here has εἰσέλθατε (aorist imperative); the Textus Receptus has εἰσέλθετε.
- v14: The text reads τί στενὴ ('how narrow!'); the Textus Receptus reads ὅτι στενὴ ('because narrow').
- v29: The text reads οἱ γραμματεῖς αὐτῶν ('their scribes'); the Textus Receptus reads οἱ γραμματεῖς καὶ οἱ Φαρισαῖοι ('the scribes and Pharisees').
- v1: (a) cognate: κρίνετε / κριθῆτε (judge / be judged).
- v2: (a) cognate / figura-etymologica: κρίματι κρίνετε (judgment you judge) and μέτρῳ μετρεῖτε, μετρηθήσεται (measure you measure, it will be measured).
- v3: (d) number shift: shifts from second-person plural in verses 1-2 to second-person singular (βλέπεις, σου) for the parable of the mote and beam.
- v4: (h) interjection: ἰδοὺ (behold), emphasizing the absurdity.
- v5: (d) number shift: continues the second-person singular address (ὑποκριτά, ἔκβαλε).
- v6: (d) number shift: reverts to the second-person plural (δῶτε, ὑμῶν, ὑμᾶς).
- v7: (b) assonance/rhyme: imperative verbs ending in -eite (Αἰτεῖτε, ζητεῖτε, κρούετε). (f) repetition: rhythmic triplet of ask/seek/knock.
- v8: (f) repetition: structurally applies and repeats the threefold ask/seek/knock promises of verse 7.
- v9: (d) number shift: moves from plural audience (ἐξ ὑμῶν) to singular subject (ἄνθρωπος, υἱὸς αὐτοῦ).
- v10: (f) repetition: exact syntactic parallel to verse 9 (requesting an item, giving a dangerous substitute).
- v11: (f) repetition: contrasts 'good gifts' (δόματα ἀγαθὰ) given by evil men with 'good things' (ἀγαθὰ) given by the Heavenly Father (a fortiori argument).
- v12: (e) inclusio: 'the law and the prophets' (ὁ νόμος καὶ οἱ προφῆται) links back to Matthew 5:17, bracketing the main body of the Sermon.
- v13: (c) definite-article patterns: τῆς στενῆς πύλης (the narrow gate).
- v14: (c) definite-article patterns: ἡ πύλη (the gate) and ἡ ὁδὸς (the way).
- v15: (c) definite-article / demonstrative: τῶν ψευδοπροφητῶν (the false prophets).
- v16: (e) inclusio / (f) refrain: 'ἀπὸ τῶν καρπῶν αὐτῶν ἐπιγνώσεσθε αὐτούς' (By their fruits you will know them) opens a pericope that closes identically in verse 20.
- v17: (f) repetition: syntactic parallelism contrasting good tree/fruit and corrupt tree/fruit.
- v18: (f) repetition: inverse parallel of verse 17, stating the impossibility of mixed natures.
- v19: (f) repetition: continues the tree/fruit imagery.
- v20: (e) inclusio / (f) refrain: repeats the exact phrase from verse 16. (h) particles: ἄρα γε (so then / therefore).
- v21: (f) repetition: κύριε κύριε (Lord, Lord). (g) divine-name: Kyrios.
- v22: (f) repetition: κύριε κύριε, and a threefold repetition of 'τῷ σῷ ὀνόματι' (in your name). (g) divine-name: Kyrios.
- v23: (f) repetition: completes the judgment formula against the false claimants.
- v24: (c) demonstrative: τοὺς λόγους τούτους (these words). (c) definite article: τὴν πέτραν (the rock, categorical).
- v25: (b) rhythmic repetition / polysyndeton: 'κατέβη ἡ βροχὴ καὶ ἦλθον οἱ ποταμοὶ καὶ ἔπνευσαν οἱ ἄνεμοι' (rain descended, and floods came, and winds blew).
- v26: (f) repetition: structured as an exact negative parallel to verse 24. (c) definite article: τὴν ἄμμον (the sand).
- v27: (a) cognate: ἔπεσεν ... πτῶσις (fell ... fall). (b) rhythmic repetition: repeats the exact storm imagery of verse 25.
- v28: (c) demonstrative: τοὺς λόγους τούτους (these words), anchoring the conclusion of the sermon.
- v29: (c) definite article: οἱ γραμματεῖς αὐτῶν (their scribes).
Hakbang 5Paghambingin ang mga salin, talata bawat talata
Inuri ang bawat pagkakaiba: tekstuwal · leksikal · gramatikal · interpretatibo · estilistiko (ang huli ay kung binabago lang ang kahulugan).
- grammaticalv1 translation of conjunction and clause structure — “not” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “so” (WEB)
- grammaticalv1 translation of the subjunctive mood and auxiliary verbs — “ye be not” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “may be” (YLT, DARBY) vs “you won’t” (WEB) vs “you may be” (DRC)
- grammaticalv2 translation of relative pronoun and preposition — “with what” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “whatever” (WEB) vs “in” (YLT)
- grammaticalv2 (vv 2, 7) choice of future tense auxiliary verb — “ye shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “you will” (WEB) vs “you” (DRC)
- grammaticalv2 phrasing of the relative clause and prepositions — “with what” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “whatever” (WEB) vs “in” (YLT) vs “the” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv2 translation of the verb for measuring — “ye mete it shall” (KJV, ASV, DARBY) vs “you measure will” (WEB) vs “measure” (YLT) vs “which give” (WEBSTER) vs “you” (DRC)
- lexicalv3 translation of the verb for seeing or beholding — “beholdest thou” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “do you see” (WEB) vs “dost behold” (YLT) vs “lookest on” (DARBY) vs “seest” (DRC)
- lexicalv3 (vv 3, 5) translation of the word for a small particle (mote vs speck) — “mote” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “speck” (WEB)
- grammaticalv3 (vv 3, 5) translation of the possessive modifier or definite article — “thy brother’s” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “your” (WEB) vs “the” (DARBY)
- lexicalv3 translation of the verb for considering or observing — “but considerest not” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “don’t consider” (WEB) vs “and” (YLT) vs “of thy brother observest” (DARBY) vs “and seest” (DRC)
- lexicalv4 translation of the verbs for allowing/letting and removing/casting out — “Let me pull out” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “cast” (ASV, DRC) vs “remove” (WEB) vs “Suffer I may cast” (YLT) vs “Allow I will cast” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv4 preposition choice and phrasing of the noun — “mote out of thine” (KJV, ASV) vs “from” (YLT, DARBY) vs “thy” (WEBSTER, DRC) vs “speck from your” (WEB)
- grammaticalv4 translation of the interjection and definite vs indefinite article — “behold a” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the” (WEB, DARBY) vs “lo the” (ASV, YLT)
- grammaticalv5 word order and explicit inclusion of the verb — “first” (ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “first cast out” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “remove” (WEB)
- grammaticalv5 translation of the future indicative verb or auxiliary — “shalt thou” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you can” (WEB) vs “shalt” (YLT) vs “wilt” (DARBY)
- lexicalv5 translation of the verb for removing or casting out — “cast out” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “remove” (WEB)
- grammaticalv6 phrasing of the negative imperative — “Give not” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “Don’t” (WEB) vs “Ye may give” (YLT)
- grammaticalv6 inclusion or omission of the definite article and preposition phrasing — “to” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto the” (KJV, ASV)
- lexicalv6 translation of the animal name and the negative conjunction (lest/haply/perhaps) — “swine lest” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “the pigs perhaps” (WEB) vs “the haply” (ASV) vs “the that” (YLT) vs “the” (DARBY) vs “perhaps” (DRC)
- lexicalv6 translation of the preposition (under, among, or with) — “under” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “among” (YLT) vs “with” (DARBY)
- interpretivev7 explicit addition of a subject noun ('the door') to clarify what will be opened — “it shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “will” (WEB) vs “the door” (WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv7 preposition choice — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “for” (WEB)
- interpretivev8 translation of the participle phrasing and explicit addition of 'the door' — “that knocketh it shall” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “who knocks will” (WEB) vs “who is knocking” (YLT) vs “knocks” (DARBY) vs “the door” (WEBSTER)
- stylisticv9 phrasing of the interrogative pronoun — “what man” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “who” (WEB)
- grammaticalv9 relative pronoun phrasing — “who” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “of” (YLT, DRC) vs “whom” (KJV)
- textualv10 variant reading of the conjunction ('and' vs 'or') — “Or” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “and” (YLT, DARBY)
- grammaticalv10 translation of the verb tense, mood, and associated prepositions — “ask” (KJV, DARBY) vs “asks for” (WEB) vs “shall for” (ASV) vs “may” (YLT) vs “shall” (WEBSTER) vs “shall him” (DRC)
- grammaticalv10 varying sentence structure and word order for the interrogative sentence — “fish” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “who” (WEB) vs “serpent” (YLT)
- grammaticalv11 translation of the inferential conjunction — “ye then” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “you” (WEB, DRC) vs “therefore” (YLT, DARBY)
- grammaticalv11 infinitive versus prepositional phrasing — “to” (WEB, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “unto” (KJV, ASV) vs “to give to” (YLT)
- lexicalv11 translation of the comparative adverb (more vs rather) — “more shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “will” (WEB, DRC) vs “rather” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv11 (vv 11, 21) singular vs plural translation of the noun for heaven — “heaven” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the heavens” (YLT, DARBY)
- grammaticalv11 (vv 11, 21) translation of the substantive participle — “them that ask” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “those who” (WEB) vs “those asking” (YLT) vs “of” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv12 translation of the subjunctive verb mood — “should do to” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “to” (WEB) vs “unto” (ASV) vs “may be doing” (YLT)
- grammaticalv13 preposition choice (at, by, or through) — “at” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “by” (WEB, ASV) vs “through” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv13 translation of the adjective (strait vs narrow) — “narrow” (WEB, ASV, DARBY, DRC) vs “strait” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER)
- grammaticalv13 translation of the present participle versus an indicative verb — “leadeth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “leads” (WEB, DARBY) vs “is leading” (YLT)
- stylisticv13 phrasing of the prepositional pronoun (thereat/thereby vs by/through it) — “by it” (WEB, WEBSTER) vs “thereat” (KJV, DRC) vs “through it” (YLT, DARBY) vs “thereby” (ASV)
- textualv14 variant reading of the conjunction ('because/for' vs 'how') — “How narrow” (WEB, DRC) vs “Because strait is” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “For narrow” (ASV, DARBY) vs “how” (YLT)
- textualv15 variant presence or absence of an adversative conjunction ('but') — “Beware” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “But take heed” (YLT) vs “But” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv15 translation of the genitive modifying noun (sheep's vs of sheep) — “sheep’s” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “the” (DRC)
- interpretivev16 supplying an explicit subject ('men' or 'you') for the impersonal verb — “men” (KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “you” (WEB)
- lexicalv16 translation of the preposition and explicit addition of a collective noun ('a bunch') — “from” (WEB, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “grapes of” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “a bunch grapes from” (DARBY)
- lexicalv16 preposition choice (from vs of) — “from” (WEB, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “figs of” (KJV, ASV, DRC)
- lexicalv17 (vv 17, 18) translation of the verb for producing or bringing forth — “bringeth forth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “produces” (WEB, DARBY) vs “doth yield” (YLT)
- lexicalv17 translation of the adjective for the bad tree (corrupt, evil, worthless) and clause structure — “the” (WEB, ASV) vs “fruit but a corrupt” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “fruits the bad” (YLT) vs “fruits the worthless” (DARBY) vs “and the evil” (DRC)
- lexicalv17 translation of the verb for producing and the adjective for evil/bad — “bringeth forth evil fruit” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “produces” (WEB) vs “doth yield fruits” (YLT) vs “produces bad fruits” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv18 singular vs plural translation of fruit — “fruit” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “fruits” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv19 translation of the verb for producing or growing in a negative clause — “that bringeth not forth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “doesn’t grow” (WEB) vs “yielding” (YLT) vs “producing” (DARBY)
- lexicalv19 translation of the verb for being cut down or hewn — “cut” (WEB, YLT, DARBY) vs “is hewn” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “shall be cut” (DRC)
- lexicalv19 translation of the verb for casting or throwing — “cast into the” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “thrown” (WEB) vs “is to” (YLT) vs “shall be” (DRC)
- grammaticalv20 future auxiliary choices and translation of the inferential particle — “ye shall” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER) vs “you will” (WEB) vs “then surely” (DARBY) vs “you” (DRC)
- lexicalv21 translation of the verb for entering or coming — “shall enter” (KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “will” (WEB) vs “come” (YLT)
- lexicalv22 translation of the verb for saying or telling — “will say to” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “tell” (WEB) vs “shall” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv22 translation of the verb tense — “done” (KJV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “do” (WEB, ASV) vs “and” (DRC)
- lexicalv22 translation of the noun for mighty works or miracles — “mighty” (WEB, ASV) vs “wonderful works” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “mighty things” (YLT) vs “of power” (DARBY) vs “miracles in thy name” (DRC)
- lexicalv23 translation of the verb for professing, acknowledging, or telling — “profess unto” (KJV, ASV, DRC) vs “will tell” (WEB) vs “will acknowledge to” (YLT) vs “avow” (DARBY) vs “to” (WEBSTER)
- lexicalv23 translation of the phrase for practicing lawlessness or working iniquity — “ye that work iniquity” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “you who” (WEB) vs “who are working lawlessness” (YLT) vs “workers of lawlessness” (DARBY) vs “you” (DRC)
- grammaticalv24 verb conjugation for 'does' or 'doeth' — “doeth” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “does” (WEB, DARBY) vs “doth do” (YLT) vs “doth” (DRC)
- lexicalv24 translation of the adjective for wise or prudent — “wise” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “prudent” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv24 translation of the definite versus indefinite article — “upon a” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “the” (ASV, YLT, DARBY) vs “on the” (WEB)
- lexicalv25 (vv 25, 27) translation of the verb for descending or coming down — “descended and” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “came down” (WEB, DARBY) vs “did descend” (YLT) vs “fell” (DRC)
- lexicalv25 (vv 25, 27) translation of the noun for floods or streams — “floods” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “streams” (YLT, DARBY)
- lexicalv25 translation of the verb for beating upon or falling on — “beat upon” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “on” (WEB) vs “they on” (YLT) vs “fell” (DARBY) vs “they” (DRC)
- grammaticalv25 translation of the negative aorist verb phrase — “fell not” (KJV, ASV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “didn’t fall” (WEB) vs “did fall” (DARBY)
- grammaticalv25 translation of the pluperfect verb tense (was vs had been) — “was” (WEB, KJV, ASV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “had been” (YLT, DARBY)
- grammaticalv25 preposition and article translation — “on the” (WEB, YLT) vs “upon a” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “the” (ASV, DARBY) vs “on” (DRC)
- grammaticalv26 translation of the present participle with a negative particle — “doeth them not shall” (KJV, ASV, WEBSTER) vs “doesn’t do will” (WEB) vs “is doing them” (YLT) vs “does do them he” (DARBY) vs “doth” (DRC)
- lexicalv26 translation of the verb for being likened to or being like — “to” (YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “like” (WEB, DRC) vs “likened unto” (KJV, ASV)
- lexicalv27 translation of the verb for beating upon or smiting — “beat upon” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “on” (WEB) vs “smote” (ASV) vs “they on” (YLT) vs “they” (DRC)
- stylisticv27 phrasing of the possessive pronoun relating to the fall — “was great” (WEB, YLT, DARBY) vs “of it” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “thereof” (ASV, DRC)
- lexicalv28 translation of the noun for words, sayings, or things — “words” (ASV, YLT, DARBY, DRC) vs “sayings” (KJV, WEBSTER) vs “things” (WEB)
- lexicalv28 translation of the noun for multitudes, crowds, or people — “multitudes” (WEB, ASV, YLT) vs “people” (KJV, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “crowds” (DARBY)
- lexicalv28 translation of the verb for being astonished or in admiration — “astonished” (WEB, KJV, ASV, YLT, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “in admiration” (DRC)
- lexicalv28 translation of the noun for teaching or doctrine — “doctrine” (KJV, DARBY, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “teaching” (WEB, ASV, YLT)
- grammaticalv29 translation of the periphrastic imperfect tense (taught vs was teaching) — “taught” (WEB, KJV, ASV, DARBY, WEBSTER) vs “was teaching” (YLT, DRC)
- textualv29 variant presence of the possessive pronoun (their scribes vs the scribes) — “as the” (KJV, YLT, WEBSTER, DRC) vs “their” (ASV, DARBY) vs “like” (WEB)
Hakbang 6Pagsamahin — mga atomic na claim, ayon sa pamilya, hindi sa bilang ng puwesto
Hinahati ang bawat pahayag sa pinakamaliit na masusuring claim; bawat kwalipikadong profile ay SUMASANG-AYON / TUMATANGGI / NAGLILINAW / TAHIMIK sa bawat isa.
Ang konsensus
While several traditions agree that good works are the necessary, inevitable evidence of a true faith and that charismatic gifts do not guarantee salvation without personal holiness, interpretations of Matthew 7 are characterized by significant theological divides. It is highly disputed whether building one's house on the rock requires the literal, active practice of the ethical demands of the Sermon on the Mount, and traditions disagree over whether the rock represents Christ himself and his promises rather than the merit of human obedience. The command to know false prophets by their fruits is also disputed, splitting traditions on whether this evaluation prioritizes visible moral transformation and peaceable living or serves primarily to discern and condemn heretical doctrine. Additionally, while several traditions maintain that the command 'Judge not' prohibits rash judgment but permits moral and doctrinal discernment, it is disputed whether entering the kingdom requires active human synergy alongside faith, which some argue refutes salvation by faith alone. Finally, some traditions uniquely apply the chapter to closed communion, pacifist nonresistance, or the assessment of credible regeneration for church membership, while a disputed view interprets the narrow gate as a literal call to rigorous physical asceticism.
Tukoy sa pamilya — katangian ng isang pamilya
The command 'Judge not' prohibits rash and hypocritical judgment but permits necessary moral and doctrinal discernment.
5 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 1 naglinaw · 6 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church SUPPORTkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (6)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Regarding judgment (v. 1-5), Augustine and the Latin moral tradition distinguish between forbidden rash judgment of inner motives and obligatory fraternal correction.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, the opening instructions on removing the beam from one's own eye (vv. 1-5) instruct congregational polity, establishing that church discipline and mutual accountability must be rooted in humility and self-examination rather than hypocritical superiority.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
“The command to remove the beam from one's own eye (vv. 3-5) informed early Methodist class meetings, emphasizing self-examination before correcting others.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The command to 'judge not' (7:1) is applied structurally to forbid believers from participating in the coercive justice systems of the state, such as swearing oaths, wielding the sword, or serving as civil magistrates, while reserving loving, non-coercive discernment for the church community.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Instead, believers are called to test all spiritual claims, including purported prophetic voices, by their 'fruits'—their conformity to Scripture and God's law.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“he argues that the command 'Judge not' (v. 1) is not a ban on moral or doctrinal discernment—which would contradict the immediate commands to identify 'dogs,' 'swine,' and 'false prophets' (vv. 6, 15)—but a prohibition against censorious, hypocritical judgment that ignores one's own faults (v. 5).”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The command not to give what is holy to dogs is a scriptural mandate for closed communion, restricting the Eucharist to the baptized.
3 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 0 naglinaw · 9 tahimikSinauna SUPPORTRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (3)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Both Latin and Eastern Catholic traditions have historically interpreted the command to not give what is holy to dogs (v. 6) as an injunction protecting the sacraments; the Didache explicitly applied this to restricting the Eucharist to the baptized, a reading maintained in the Eastern liturgies' guarding of the mysteries.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“From the earliest patristic era, recorded in the Didache, this verse was understood as a strict prohibition against giving the Eucharist to the unbaptized, establishing the practice of closed communion.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The prohibition against giving 'holy things to the dogs' (7:6) is universally interpreted through a mystagogical and Eucharistic lens, establishing the boundary of closed communion.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The analogy of the trees demonstrates that a person must first be justified by faith before they can produce works pleasing to God.
3 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 0 naglinaw · 9 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon SUPPORTFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (3)
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
“The tree must first be made good by faith before it can produce good fruit.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Good works do not merit salvation, but they are the necessary, visible fruits and evidences of a regenerate heart and a true, living faith.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“John Gill, in his 'Exposition of the Old and New Testaments', emphasizes that the 'good tree' yielding 'good fruit' represents a person who has experienced an internal, regenerating work of grace, which must precede any valid outward religious profession or ordinance.”
- Lutheran · AFFIRM
The good tree producing good fruit illustrates that good works are the necessary, inevitable evidence of a true, justifying faith.
6 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 1 naglinaw · 5 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon SUPPORTFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (7)
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“The Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion draws directly on Jesus' botanical metaphor in Article XII ('Of Good Works'), stating that a lively faith is as evidently known by good works 'as a tree discerned by the fruit' (vv. 16-20).” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“This is codified in the 'Formula of Concord' (Solid Declaration), which uses the tree imagery to articulate that true faith is never without good works, yet those works are the spontaneous result, not the cause, of justification.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Good works do not merit salvation, but they are the necessary, visible fruits and evidences of a regenerate heart and a true, living faith.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“John Gill, in his 'Exposition of the Old and New Testaments', emphasizes that the 'good tree' yielding 'good fruit' represents a person who has experienced an internal, regenerating work of grace, which must precede any valid outward religious profession or ordinance.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
“Furthermore, Jesus' warning that only those who 'do the will of my Father' will enter the kingdom (v. 21) is historically read by Methodists as proof that present justification does not guarantee final salvation apart from a life of active obedience and fruit-bearing.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“In the Anabaptist tradition, Matthew 7 is the culminating mandate for 'Nachfolge Christi' (discipleship), establishing that true faith is inherently visible, active, and obedient.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The tradition maintains a strict, functional distinction between the gifts of the Spirit (which can be misappropriated by those who practice lawlessness, v. 23) and the fruit of the Spirit (which alone confirms the presence of saving faith and obedience to the Father's will) (Stanley Horton, 'Systematic Theology: A Pentecostal Perspective').”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
Tukoy sa tradisyon — isang tradisyon lang
The command against judging and the Golden Rule serve as foundational mandates for corporate social inclusivity and ethics.
1 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 0 naglinaw · 11 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (1)
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Meanwhile, Broad Church, Anglo-Catholic, and progressive Anglicans heavily emphasize the injunction not to judge (v. 1) and the Golden Rule as foundational for social ethics and inclusivity, often following Charles Gore in reading these commands as a practical, corporate moral law for the Church's engagement with society.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
The prohibition against judging forbids believers from participating in coercive state justice systems or violence.
1 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 0 naglinaw · 11 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (1)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The command to 'judge not' (7:1) is applied structurally to forbid believers from participating in the coercive justice systems of the state, such as swearing oaths, wielding the sword, or serving as civil magistrates, while reserving loving, non-coercive discernment for the church community.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
The promise that the Father gives good gifts assures believers that they will not receive counterfeit or demonic spirits when seeking the Baptism in the Holy Spirit.
1 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 0 naglinaw · 11 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (1)
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Pentecostal pioneers read the promise that the Father will give 'good gifts' to those who ask (v. 11) as an absolute assurance that believers seeking the Spirit will not receive a counterfeit or demonic manifestation (Donald Gee, 'Concerning Spiritual Gifts').”
- Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
The Golden Rule aligns with and reflects the dictates of human reason and natural law.
1 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 0 naglinaw · 11 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (1)
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“Richard Hooker views the Golden Rule (v. 12) as a primary dictate of reason and natural law, demonstrating the consonance of Christ's teaching with human rationality.”
- Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
The narrow gate and broad way contrast the persecuted, nonresistant minority church against compromised, worldly state religions.
1 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 1 naglinaw · 10 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (2)
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“early leaders like Dirk Philips, in his 'Enchiridion', identified the 'broad way' with the magisterial state churches that relied on worldly power and coercion, while the 'narrow way' was walked by the nonresistant, suffering minority of the true, visible church.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
“The 'narrow gate' (v. 13-14) has historically resonated with the movement's early sectarian identity, representing the strict path of biblical restoration over and against the broad way of denominationalism and human creeds.”
- Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
The standard of examining 'fruits' mandates that local congregations assess the credible regeneration of candidates before admitting them to baptism and membership.
1 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 0 naglinaw · 11 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (1)
- Baptist · AFFIRM
“In the governance of the local church, the mandate to assess 'fruit' is practically applied when congregations or elders interview candidates for believers' baptism and church membership, looking for genuine evidence of a transformed life.”
- Baptist · AFFIRM
Doing the will of the Father requires explicit obedience to the authorized New Testament pattern of salvation, including baptism.
1 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 0 naglinaw · 11 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (1)
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“This 'will' is understood to include obeying the specific commands of the New Testament pattern, notably repentance and baptism for the remission of sins.”
- Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
The 'iniquity' or lawlessness condemned by Christ refers specifically to the transgression of the Ten Commandments.
1 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 0 naglinaw · 11 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (1)
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“Ellen G. White, in 'The Great Controversy', utilizes these verses to describe end-time religious deception, where movements will perform apparent miracles ('cast out demons,' 'mighty works') while simultaneously rejecting the binding nature of the Ten Commandments—often pointing specifically to the rejection of the seventh-day Sabbath.”
- Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
Nabanggit sa mga pamilya — sining-ayunan saanman sa bawat pamilya, walang nakararami — hindi pinagkaisahan
The rejection of those who perform miracles in Christ's name demonstrates that charismatic gifts do not guarantee salvation without personal holiness.
7 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 1 naglinaw · 4 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church SUPPORTkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (8)
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, verses 21-23 ('Lord, Lord') serve as a sobering caution in monastic spiritual direction: true holiness and spiritual authority are never measured by charismatic speech, prophesy, or miracles, but by humble obedience, repentance, and steadfast adherence to the Orthodox faith.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Those who practice lawlessness, regardless of their miraculous gifts or orthodox professions, demonstrate they were never truly united to Christ or foreknown in God's eternal decree.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“Charles Spurgeon, in 'The Gospel of the Kingdom', draws heavily on the contrasts of the narrow gate (vv. 13-14) and the builders (vv. 24-27) to warn against the false assurance generated by merely participating in religious activities—even prophesying or doing mighty works—without a personal, saving knowledge of Christ ('I never knew you').” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“The rejection of those who say 'Lord, Lord' but do not do the Father's will definitively refutes antinomianism and demonstrates that practical holiness is necessary for final salvation.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The instruction to evaluate fruits (7:16-20) is practiced in communal discernment, where the selection of ministers prioritizes character, nonviolence, and moral integrity over academic theology or claims to charismatic gifts (7:22).” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“Early leaders like William J. Seymour emphasized that spiritual gifts without holiness and divine love are ultimately rejected by Christ as 'iniquity' (William J. Seymour, 'The Apostolic Faith').” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The warning against those who perform miracles in Christ's name but work 'iniquity' foretells end-time religious deceptions that prioritize supernatural signs over obedience to God's commandments.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · QUALIFY
“Sermons on verses 21-23 often emphasize the tragedy of being 'religiously wrong'—warning that sincere people who perform 'many mighty works' but fail to follow the authorized New Testament pattern will be rejected.”
- Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
Pinagtatalunan — halo ang pamilya, o sumasang-ayon laban sa tumatanggi ang mga pamilya
The command against judging mandates an ascetic practice of radical self-reproach and a refusal to condemn one's neighbor.
1 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 1 naglinaw · 10 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (2)
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“Ascetic fathers like St. Dorotheos of Gaza read this passage as an absolute command against condemning one's neighbor, demanding radical self-reproach and constant attention to one's own sins (the 'beam').” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
“The command to remove the beam from one's own eye (vv. 3-5) informed early Methodist class meetings, emphasizing self-examination before correcting others.”
- Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
The commands to ask, seek, and knock emphasize human synergy and ascending fervency in the pursuit of grace.
1 sumang-ayon · 1 tumanggi · 0 naglinaw · 10 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon LEANING-CONTESTEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (2)
- Lutheran · DENY
“The Sermon's stringent ethical demands (such as the Golden Rule in Matthew 7:12) are characteristically read through the second use of the Law, functioning as a mirror to crush self-righteousness, while the promises to those who ask, seek, and knock (Matthew 7:7-11) are received as pure Gospel, assuring the terrified conscience of the Father's unmerited favor.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“The progression of 'ask, seek, knock' (vv. 7-8) is understood as an invitation to pursue prevenient, justifying, and sanctifying grace with increasing fervor, reflecting the tradition's synergism and emphasis on free response.”
- Lutheran · DENY
The narrow gate represents a literal call to rigorous physical asceticism and the mortification of earthly passions.
3 sumang-ayon · 0 tumanggi · 1 naglinaw · 8 tahimikSinauna SUPPORTRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (4)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, Eastern Fathers like John Chrysostom emphasize the narrow gate (v. 13-14) as the biblical mandate for rigorous asceticism and the monastic struggle, reading the 'fruits' of the false prophets (v. 15-20) as primarily moral and ascetical failures rather than merely doctrinal errors.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The 'narrow gate' (verses 13-14) is embraced as the path of askesis (fasting, prayer, and almsgiving) required to uproot the passions.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The 'narrow gate' (7:13-14) serves as the scriptural mandate for the Desert Fathers' ascetic rigor; Cyril of Alexandria interprets this gate as the difficult but necessary mortification of fleshly desires to attain life.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
“The 'narrow gate' (v. 13) is interpreted as the rigorous path of universal holiness, contrasting sharply with the 'broad way' of nominal religion.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
The teaching to know false prophets by their fruits is primarily a tool to discern and condemn heretical doctrine.
3 sumang-ayon · 3 tumanggi · 3 naglinaw · 3 tahimikSinauna MIXEDRepormasyon MIXEDFree-church MIXEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (9)
- Catholic · DENY
“Furthermore, Eastern Fathers like John Chrysostom emphasize the narrow gate (v. 13-14) as the biblical mandate for rigorous asceticism and the monastic struggle, reading the 'fruits' of the false prophets (v. 15-20) as primarily moral and ascetical failures rather than merely doctrinal errors.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“During the Christological controversies, miaphysite defenders like Severus of Antioch applied the test of 'fruits' (7:15-20) to false teachers, arguing that Chalcedonian or Nestorian teachings produced the 'bad fruit' of dividing the one incarnate Word.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Additionally, Philip Melanchthon in the 'Apology of the Augsburg Confession' utilizes the warning against false prophets in sheep's clothing (Matthew 7:15) to address the reality of hypocrites within the visible church, emphasizing that teaching contrary to the Gospel is the evil fruit by which they are exposed.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“Those who practice lawlessness, regardless of their miraculous gifts or orthodox professions, demonstrate they were never truly united to Christ or foreknown in God's eternal decree.” - Baptist · QUALIFY
“In the governance of the local church, the mandate to assess 'fruit' is practically applied when congregations or elders interview candidates for believers' baptism and church membership, looking for genuine evidence of a transformed life.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
“The principle of knowing a tree 'by its fruits' (vv. 16-20) remains the primary diagnostic in the Wesleyan tradition for evaluating charismatic experiences, revivals, and personal claims of entire sanctification; subjective spiritual feelings must be validated by objective moral transformation and holy tempers.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · DENY
“The instruction to evaluate fruits (7:16-20) is practiced in communal discernment, where the selection of ministers prioritizes character, nonviolence, and moral integrity over academic theology or claims to charismatic gifts (7:22).” - Seventh-day Adventist · QUALIFY
“Thus, 'fruits' (verses 16-20) are defined not by the presence of supernatural power, but by obedience to God's moral law and the reproduction of Christ's character.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Apologetically, the tradition frequently addresses verse 1 ('Judge not') to counter modern cultural relativism, teaching that Christians must exercise righteous judgment and inspect 'fruit' (v. 16) to expose false teaching while maintaining personal purity.”
- Catholic · DENY
The evaluation of 'fruits' prioritizes visible moral transformation and peaceable living over orthodoxy or supernatural displays.
4 sumang-ayon · 2 tumanggi · 1 naglinaw · 5 tahimikSinauna MIXEDRepormasyon MIXEDFree-church UNDETERMINEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (7)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“Furthermore, Eastern Fathers like John Chrysostom emphasize the narrow gate (v. 13-14) as the biblical mandate for rigorous asceticism and the monastic struggle, reading the 'fruits' of the false prophets (v. 15-20) as primarily moral and ascetical failures rather than merely doctrinal errors.” - Oriental Orthodox · DENY
“During the Christological controversies, miaphysite defenders like Severus of Antioch applied the test of 'fruits' (7:15-20) to false teachers, arguing that Chalcedonian or Nestorian teachings produced the 'bad fruit' of dividing the one incarnate Word.” - Lutheran · DENY
“Additionally, Philip Melanchthon in the 'Apology of the Augsburg Confession' utilizes the warning against false prophets in sheep's clothing (Matthew 7:15) to address the reality of hypocrites within the visible church, emphasizing that teaching contrary to the Gospel is the evil fruit by which they are exposed.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Pastors urge congregants not to rest their assurance on outward church membership, intellectual profession, or visible spiritual gifts, but to look for the fruit of sincere obedience to God's moral law.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“The principle of knowing a tree 'by its fruits' (vv. 16-20) remains the primary diagnostic in the Wesleyan tradition for evaluating charismatic experiences, revivals, and personal claims of entire sanctification; subjective spiritual feelings must be validated by objective moral transformation and holy tempers.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“The instruction to evaluate fruits (7:16-20) is practiced in communal discernment, where the selection of ministers prioritizes character, nonviolence, and moral integrity over academic theology or claims to charismatic gifts (7:22).” - Seventh-day Adventist · QUALIFY
“Thus, 'fruits' (verses 16-20) are defined not by the presence of supernatural power, but by obedience to God's moral law and the reproduction of Christ's character.”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Entering the kingdom requires active obedience and human synergy alongside faith, refuting the concept of salvation by faith alone.
4 sumang-ayon · 2 tumanggi · 2 naglinaw · 4 tahimikSinauna SUPPORTRepormasyon OPPOSEFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (8)
- Catholic · AFFIRM
“On justification, the Council of Trent drew heavily on Christ's warning that saying 'Lord, Lord' is insufficient without doing the Father's will (v. 21) to repudiate justification by faith alone, insisting that saving faith must be formed by charity and obedience.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“St. John Chrysostom emphasizes that crying out 'Lord, Lord' (mere belief or verbal confession) is insufficient for salvation without the active fruit of repentance and obedience to the commandments, rejecting any concept of salvation by faith alone that excludes transformational works.” - Lutheran · DENY
“This is codified in the 'Formula of Concord' (Solid Declaration), which uses the tree imagery to articulate that true faith is never without good works, yet those works are the spontaneous result, not the cause, of justification.” - Reformed / Presbyterian · DENY
“Good works do not merit salvation, but they are the necessary, visible fruits and evidences of a regenerate heart and a true, living faith.” - Baptist · QUALIFY
“John Gill, in his 'Exposition of the Old and New Testaments', emphasizes that the 'good tree' yielding 'good fruit' represents a person who has experienced an internal, regenerating work of grace, which must precede any valid outward religious profession or ordinance.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
“The rejection of those who say 'Lord, Lord' but do not do the Father's will definitively refutes antinomianism and demonstrates that practical holiness is necessary for final salvation.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“Most crucially, verses 21-27 provide the Anabaptist counter-weight to purely forensic views of justification.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“Within the Restoration Movement (Churches of Christ), Matthew 7 is a pivotal text for articulating the absolute necessity of active obedience in salvation, serving as a primary counter-text to Protestant doctrines of 'faith only' (sola fide).”
- Catholic · AFFIRM
Christ's declaration 'I never knew you' proves that ultimate salvation is grounded in God's sovereign electing love rather than outward profession.
1 sumang-ayon · 1 tumanggi · 1 naglinaw · 9 tahimikSinauna UNDETERMINEDRepormasyon UNDETERMINEDFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (3)
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Christ's declaration 'I never knew you' distinguishes the visible church from the elect, showing that 'knowing' refers to God's sovereign electing love.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
“The rejection of those who say 'Lord, Lord' but do not do the Father's will definitively refutes antinomianism and demonstrates that practical holiness is necessary for final salvation.” - Seventh-day Adventist · DENY
“The chapter closes with a series of stark dualisms requiring a definitive choice: the narrow and broad gates and ways (Matthew 7:13-14), true and false prophets known by their fruits rather than their appearances (Matthew 7:15-20), true and false disciples separated by their actual obedience to the Father's will rather than mere verbal profession (Matthew 7:21-23), and the wise and foolish builders whose foundations are tested by the storm (Matthew 7:24-27).”
- Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
The rock in the parable of the builders represents Jesus Christ himself and his promises, rather than the merit of human obedience.
2 sumang-ayon · 2 tumanggi · 5 naglinaw · 3 tahimikSinauna LEANING-CONTESTEDRepormasyon SUPPORTFree-church LEANING-CONTESTEDkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (9)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“The house built on the rock (v. 24-27) is widely received typologically as the Church built upon Christ's teachings, which withstands the floods of heresy and persecution.” - Eastern Orthodox · QUALIFY
“The tradition teaches that entering the Kingdom (verses 21-23) requires building one's life upon the rock of Christ through active, synergistic effort in the pursuit of theosis.” - Oriental Orthodox · QUALIFY
“Aphrahat identifies the 'rock' directly as Christ himself, upon whom the believer builds a steadfast life of faith and rigorous self-denial.” - Lutheran · AFFIRM
“Lutheran homiletics applies this chapter by driving hearers away from relying on their own moral performance (the sand) and toward reliance on Christ's alien righteousness (the rock).” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“Believers are exhorted to build their lives exclusively on the Rock of Christ's Word, trusting in His sovereign grace while fervently praying for the Holy Spirit's assistance to walk the narrow path.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · QUALIFY
“Preaching frequently exhorts believers to 'build upon the rock' (vv. 24-27) by translating warm-hearted piety into tangible works of mercy and piety, ensuring that their faith is not a mere intellectual assent but a transformative obedience that can withstand the storms of life and judgment.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · DENY
“Building one's house on the rock (7:24) is prayed and enacted as a commitment to nonconformity—the conscious choice to follow the narrow way (7:14) of Jesus' specific ethical teachings, anticipating that it will provoke cultural marginalization or persecution.” - Seventh-day Adventist · QUALIFY
“In pastoral and evangelistic settings, the chapter is a call to build one's life securely on the 'rock' (verse 24) of Christ's word, which requires yielding to His transforming grace and keeping His commandments, even when it means walking the less popular, narrow path.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · DENY
“...and the concluding parable of the wise and foolish builders, which grounds survival in the coming storm strictly on hearing and doing the words of Jesus.”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
Building one's house on the rock requires the literal, active practice of the ethical demands of the Sermon on the Mount.
10 sumang-ayon · 1 tumanggi · 1 naglinaw · 0 tahimikSinauna SUPPORTRepormasyon MIXEDFree-church SUPPORTkung sino ang nagsabi ng ano (12)
- Catholic · QUALIFY
“The house built on the rock (v. 24-27) is widely received typologically as the Church built upon Christ's teachings, which withstands the floods of heresy and persecution.” - Eastern Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The discourse closes with the parable of the two builders (verses 24-27), establishing the necessity of actionable obedience to His teachings.” - Oriental Orthodox · AFFIRM
“The concluding parable of the wise builder (7:24-27) is central to Syriac asceticism; Aphrahat identifies the 'rock' directly as Christ himself, upon whom the believer builds a steadfast life of faith and rigorous self-denial.” - Anglican / Episcopal · AFFIRM
“The discourse concludes with eschatological warnings requiring a decisive choice: entering the narrow gate (vv. 13-14), discerning true from false prophets by their fruits (vv. 15-20), doing the Father's will rather than offering mere verbal profession (vv. 21-23), and the culminating parable of the wise and foolish builders, which bases ultimate security on actively doing Jesus' words (vv. 24-27).” - Lutheran · DENY
“Lutheran homiletics applies this chapter by driving hearers away from relying on their own moral performance (the sand) and toward reliance on Christ's alien righteousness (the rock).” - Reformed / Presbyterian · AFFIRM
“He concludes with the parable of the two builders, illustrating the necessity of hearing and doing his words, leaving the crowds astonished at his authority.” - Baptist · AFFIRM
“The parable of the wise and foolish builders is regularly employed in discipleship to underscore that submitting to biblical authority means actively obeying Christ's commands, not merely hearing them in a church service.” - Methodist / Wesleyan / Holiness · AFFIRM
“Preaching frequently exhorts believers to 'build upon the rock' (vv. 24-27) by translating warm-hearted piety into tangible works of mercy and piety, ensuring that their faith is not a mere intellectual assent but a transformative obedience that can withstand the storms of life and judgment.” - Anabaptist / Mennonite · AFFIRM
“For thinkers like Hans Denck, crying 'Lord, Lord' (7:21) without actually performing the ethical demands of the Sermon on the Mount constitutes building one's house on the sand (7:26); true belief requires literal obedience to Christ's teachings.” - Classical Trinitarian Pentecostal · AFFIRM
“The terrifying warning of verse 23 ('I never knew you') is frequently preached to instill the fear of the Lord, reminding the congregation that building one's house on the rock (v. 24) requires ongoing sanctification and obedience to Christ's moral teachings, not merely the enjoyment of Pentecostal phenomena.” - Seventh-day Adventist · AFFIRM
“The narrow gate and building upon the rock represent the path of self-denial, strict adherence to God's law, and putting Christ's teachings into practical action.” - Restorationist / Churches of Christ · AFFIRM
“...and the concluding parable of the wise and foolish builders, which grounds survival in the coming storm strictly on hearing and doing the words of Jesus.”
- Catholic · QUALIFY
Hakbang 7I-render ang New Consensus Bible
Mula sa teksto sa orihinal na wika. Idinodokumento ng mga tradisyon ang pagtanggap; hindi sila bumoboto sa mga salita. Nakalista sa ibaba ang bawat pinagtalunang salita na inayos ng pagsasalin, hindi ito nakatago.
1“Do not judge, so that you may not be judged. 2For with whatever judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with whatever measure you measure, it will be measured to you. 3Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the beam that is in your own eye? 4Or how will you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye,’ and look, the beam is in your own eye? 5You hypocrite, first remove the beam out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother’s eye. 6“Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, or they will trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces. 7“Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. 8For everyone who asks receives, and the one who seeks finds, and to the one who knocks it will be opened. 9Or is there any man among you who, if his son asks him for bread, will give him a stone? 10Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? 11If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask him! 12“Therefore, whatever you want people to do to you, do also to them; for this is the Law and the Prophets. 13“Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter through it. 14How narrow is the gate, and restricted is the road that leads to life, and few are those who find it! 15“Watch out for the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. 16You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17So every good tree produces good fruit, but the rotten tree produces bad fruit. 18A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a rotten tree produce good fruit. 19Every tree that does not produce good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20So then, you will recognize them by their fruits. 21“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name cast out demons, and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’ 24“Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock. 25The rain came down, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they beat against that house, and it did not fall; for it had been founded on the rock. 26And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand. 27The rain came down, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and they struck against that house, and it fell; and great was its fall.” 28When Jesus had finished saying these words, the crowds were astounded at his teaching, 29for he was teaching them as one having authority, and not as their scribes.
Mga ginawang pagpili — bawat alitan na niresolba ng pagsasalin
| Talata | Pinagmulan | Mga Opsyon | Pinili | Bakit | Kat. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1 | Μὴ κρίνετε | “Judge not” (T) | “Don’t judge” (T) | “Do not judge” (S) | “Do not judge” | Provides a direct, dignified modern imperative without rendering it as an exclusively ascetic self-reproach, a position disputed among traditions. | interpretive |
| v1 | ἵνα μὴ κριθῆτε | “that ye be not” (T) | “so that you won’t be” (T) | “so that you may not be” (S) | “so that you may not be” | Translates the purpose clause literally and maintains the structural cognate with the main verb. | grammatical |
| v2 | ἐν ᾧ | “with what” (T) | “with whatever” (T) | “with whatever” | Uses contemporary English idiom for an indefinite relative clause. | grammatical |
| v2 | μετρεῖτε | “measure” (T/S) | “mete” (T) | “measure” | Maintains the repetition/cognate with the noun for measure. | lexical |
| v3 | βλέπεις | “beholdest thou” (T) | “do you see” (T) | “do you see” | Updates archaic phrasing; notes the source text shifts to a second-person singular which is flattened to plural-indistinguishable 'you' in modern English. | lexical |
| v3 | κάρφος | “mote” (T) | “speck” (T) | “speck” | Provides the universally recognized contemporary English equivalent for a small particle. | lexical |
| v4 | ἄφες ἐκβάλω | “Let me pull out” (T) | “cast” (T) | “remove” (T/S) | “remove” | Provides a natural contemporary rendering for extracting a small object from an eye. | lexical |
| v4 | ἰδοὺ | “behold” (T) | “lo” (T) | “look” (S) | “look” | Updates the archaic interjection per global guidelines. | grammatical |
| v6 | χοίρων μήποτε | “swine, lest perhaps” (T) | “the pigs, or they will” (S/A) | “pigs, or they will” | Updates vocabulary and renders the negative conjunction idiomatically for modern readers. | lexical |
| v7 | Αἰτεῖτε... ζητεῖτε... κρούετε | Translate as active condition conditional commands (S) | Translate to emphasize ascending synergism (T) | Translate as active condition conditional commands | Maintains the rhythmic triplet of imperatives without forcing an explicitly synergistic grid, which is disputed among traditions. | interpretive |
| v7 | ἀνοιγήσεται | “it shall” (T) | “the door” (T) | “it will” (S) | “it will” | Refrains from supplying the word 'door', leaving the impersonal passive construction as it is in Greek. | interpretive |
| v8 | ὁ ζητῶν | “he that seeketh” (T) | “the one who seeks” (S) | “the one who seeks” | Translates the substantive participle substantively and fluidly. | grammatical |
| v9 | τίς ἐστιν ἐξ ὑμῶν ἄνθρωπος | “what man is there of you” (T) | “who is there among you” (T) | “is there any man among you” (S) | “is there any man among you” | Flows more naturally while retaining the specific noun 'man' to reflect the singular shift. | stylistic |
| v10 | ἢ καὶ ἐὰν | “Or” (T) | “and” (T) | “Or if” (T) | “Or if” | Follows the variant reading combining the disjunctive 'or' and conditional 'if' smoothly. | textual |
| v10 | ὄφιν | “serpent” (T) | “snake” (S) | “snake” | Uses the standard contemporary English term. | lexical |
| v11 | τοῖς οὐρανοῖς | “the heavens” (T) | “heaven” (T/S) | “heaven” | Translates the plural Greek noun as a singular idiomatically expected in English, noting the flattening of the number. | grammatical |
| v12 | ὁ νόμος καὶ οἱ προφῆται | lowercase “the law and the prophets” (T) | capitalized “the Law and the Prophets” (A) | capitalized “the Law and the Prophets” | Capitalizes to denote the specific structural body of Hebrew scripture, creating a recognizable inclusio with chapter 5. | interpretive |
| v13 | στενῆς | “strait” (T) | “narrow” (T/S) | “narrow” | Uses contemporary vocabulary, avoiding explicit endorsement of literal rigorous physical asceticism, a view disputed among traditions. | interpretive |
| v14 | τί στενὴ | “Because strait is” (T) | “How narrow is” (T/S) | “How narrow is” | Follows the textual variant reading with 'how' (τί) over 'because/for' (ὅτι). | textual |
| v14 | τεθλιμμένη | “straitened” (T) | “restricted” (T) | “restricted” | Captures the sense of a pressed or constricted path in modern English. | lexical |
| v15 | Προσέχετε δὲ | “Beware of” (T) | “But take heed of” (T) | “Watch out for” (S/A) | “Watch out for” | Flattens the transitional particle δὲ for stylistic smoothness while conveying the warning idiomatically. | stylistic |
| v16 | καρπῶν | “fruits” translated neutrally (S) | interpretive rendering prioritizing orthodoxy or morals (A) | “fruits” translated neutrally | Maintains the agricultural metaphor exactly, as its prioritization (doctrinal vs moral) is disputed among traditions. | interpretive |
| v16 | συλλέγουσιν | “Do men gather” (T) | “Are grapes gathered” (S) | “Are grapes gathered” | Translates the impersonal active third-person plural verb as a passive to retain the generic sense without interpolating 'men'. | grammatical |
| v17 | σαπρὸν | “corrupt” (T) | “worthless” (T) | “rotten” (S) | “rotten” | Provides a highly fitting agricultural adjective for a bad or diseased tree. | lexical |
| v17 | καρποὺς | “fruits” (T) | “fruit” (T) | “fruit” | Translates the plural Greek noun as a singular collective English noun for natural idiom, flattening the morphological number. | grammatical |
| v21 | ὁ ποιῶν τὸ θέλημα | Translate literally as "does the will" (S) | Paraphrase to resolve synergism debate (A) | Translate literally as "does the will" | Leaves the necessity of human action transparent in the rendering without forcing a dogmatic resolution on whether it refutes faith alone, as this is disputed among traditions. | interpretive |
| v22 | δυνάμεις | “mighty works” (T) | “miracles” (S/A) | “miracles” | Reflects the common lexical meaning of dynameis in the context of exorcisms and prophetic feats. | lexical |
| v23 | οὐδέποτε ἔγνων | Render literal "I never knew you" (S) | Render as theological election (A) | Render literal "I never knew you" | Retains the exact relational verb without interpreting it explicitly as an abstract statement of sovereign election, a view disputed among traditions. | interpretive |
| v24 | ὁμοιωθήσεται | “will be likened to” (T) | “will be like” (S/A) | “will be like” | Translates the passive future indicative smoothly to convey the function of comparison. | grammatical |
| v24 | τὴν πέτραν | “a rock” (T) | “the rock” (T/S) | “the rock” | Retains the definite article exactly, remaining neutral on whether it typologizes Christ himself or points to obedience, as its reference is disputed among traditions. | interpretive |
| v25 | καὶ ἦλθον... καὶ ἔπνευσαν | Translate storm clauses with asyndeton (T) | Preserve rhythmic polysyndeton (S) | Preserve rhythmic polysyndeton | Keeps the continuous 'and... and... and' conjunctions to reflect the source text's dramatic pacing. | stylistic |
| v27 | προσέκοψαν | “beat upon” (T) | “struck against” (S) | “struck against” | Differentiates this verb (prosekopsan) from the slightly different compound (prosepesan) used in verse 25. | lexical |
| v28 | ἐξεπλήσσοντο | “astonished” (T) | “astounded” (S) | “astounded” | Uses a slightly stronger contemporary synonym to capture the force of exeplēssonto. | lexical |
| v29 | ἦν γὰρ διδάσκων | “taught” (T) | “was teaching” (T/S) | “was teaching” | Translates the periphrastic imperfect construction accurately. | grammatical |
| v29 | οἱ γραμματεῖς αὐτῶν | “the scribes” (T) | “their scribes” (T/S) | “their scribes” | Follows the text containing the plural possessive pronoun. | textual |
Mga limitasyong dapat malaman
- This is AI-generated and source-grounded, and it is approved by no community that holds these traditions.
- The readings were produced in isolated calls that do not see one another. Isolation prevents anchoring; it does not make them independent witnesses.
- The Nicene-Trinitarian boundary, and the decision not to seat non-denominational Evangelicalism separately (it is a cross-traditional movement already present within several voting profiles), are editorial choices.
- The roster, the grouping into three families, and the rule that families (not seat counts) carry consensus all shape the result. A different roster would produce a different synthesis.
- One profile cannot exhaust a tradition; the synthesis reflects what the profiles said, not everything the traditions hold.
- The non-voting panels (Academic, Jewish) never vote; LDS and Jehovah's Witness readings are a comparative appendix only.
- Any profiles excluded for this chapter after failing the audit are named on the page and removed from the eligible roster for it.
- The rendering is unreviewed by any tradition, and every contested wording it settled is listed in Choices Made — where the text forced a decision, the decision is documented rather than hidden behind a claim of preserved ambiguity.